ML20101B770
| ML20101B770 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/03/1995 |
| From: | Saggio J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| FOIA-95-364, FOIA-95-A-20 NUDOCS 9603150037 | |
| Download: ML20101B770 (2) | |
Text
-
Joseph A. Sqjo Attomey and Counselor at law e
24500 Center RK p Road Suifx 1T>
Wedlake. Oluo 44145 Telephone (216) 858200 ru (216} 8nsn1 October 3,1995 APPEAL.0F R!ESL FO!A DtOm0ff 95-4 -ato E bs-34h Executive Director for Operations P-v.)al. I o - t * -M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Re: Appeal for an Initial FOIA Decision FOIA Request 95-364
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is a copy of my FOIA request and the response dated September 26,1995 from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. As you can see, my request is for the latest and all versions in effect during 1995 of the Perry Nuclear Plant Security Plan. Your response denies my request on the basis of Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act.
Without admitting the correctness ofyour position, I am aware that the Commission would have some sensitivity in disclosing security plans. It was not my intent to receive information mganling the means by which nuclear power plants maintain their security. Rather, I wish to determine the procedures that the Perry Nuclear Plant provide for in its security plan to resolve issues regarding admission to the plant. Pursuant to Section 73.56 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, each applicant for a licenso is required to submit an access authorization program within its security plan. It is this physical security plan about which I wish to obtain information.
I would be entirely satisfied if you were to provide me only that part of the security plan that describes the access authorization plan. In particular I wish to know to what extent the Perry Nuclear Plant has provided for review procedures as required by 10 CFR Section 73.56(e).
It would appear to me that disclosure of the due process requirements as required by Commission Regulations would not compromise security for the Perry Nuclear Plant. I am trying to be as accommodating as possible with the 9603150037 951003 PDR FOIA SAGGIO95-A-20 PDR
2 understanding that you have a fair need to maintain security. I hope you agree with me that individuals should be allowed to know what procedures the Commission has mandated on its licensees for the resolution of due process considerations.
V f truly yours, ph A. Sa Enclosure ec:
Rex Brown JAS: ems j
i i