ML20100F483
| ML20100F483 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 02/16/1996 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9602210349 | |
| Download: ML20100F483 (5) | |
Text
.
Southern Nuclear Operating Company Post Ome) Bc;1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 T;lephone (205) 868-5131 Southern Nudear Operating Company o... uerey Nr*eIN$!e*c"t February 16, 1996 10 CFR 26.71 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364
'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six-month reporting period, July 1995 through December 1995, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). The data is summarized in the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
RespecGy submitted,
/d D. N. Morey DNM/JMG : FFD Performance Data Sheets : Southern Nuclear FFD Program Summary cc: (See next page) ng22;ggg ggggge R
21015j lph l\\
o
\\
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 l
cc: Southern Nuclear Operatine Company Mr. R. D. Hill, General Manager - Plant Farley l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatorv Commission. Washington. DC Mr. B. L. Siegel, Licensing Project Manager - Farley I
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Region II l
Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr. T. M. Ross, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley l
l l
l E
i i
f l
\\
ENCLOSURE 1 Page 1 of 2 l
1 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 1
l Southern Nuclear Operating Company 12/31/95 cauweer e Mw es Eneme J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant and Corporate Headquarters l
Lo meen Elizabeth A. McDougal (205) 868-5707 con:aa Name pe ne onause wee ano.)
Cutoffs: ScreervConfirmation (ng/ml)
Gil Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines
/
/
C caine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
l Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number witt Unescorted Access 1293 75 204 l
Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre Access 5
0 24
.0 944 21 k
Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 el Observed behavior 7
0 0
0 2
0 l
aMom 352 0
18 0
56 0
Follow-up 8
0 0
0 15 0
Other Safety & Health retest. return to wh 31 0
0 0
1 1
Total 403 0
42 0
1018 22 REV.1/92
2
(
f 2
g 2
o 2
o ge P
5 4
3 2
1 lat s s e uT f
o o
0 0
e o Rt 1
E lo R
a h
U e
o S
c lc o
o 2
2 O
L n
A C
a N
t E
s
-ye b
cn u
cd i
S
%l o
o 0
0 ic i
c if i
- s c
e e e
h n pi p
mm o
o 1
1 S
Af a ro f
se t
s a
t i
s p
o o
0 0
e O
Te e
v m
i a
t c
i o
o o
4 4
s C
o P
an d
a e
u j
5 5
m i
o o
1 1
ra r
M ifn s
s o
r r
C s
o o
t e
c c
t f
e a
a o
y r
r t
u tn n
- p o
o n
i C
C r
w iE o
m m
e r
r d
e e
e k
s T-T-
a n
g r
t l
e e
n o
a c
t o
h o
r O
L S
T B
.~
e ENCLOSURE 2 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant and Southern Nuclear Operating Company Support Personnel Fitness For Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness For Duty (FFD) program from July 1995 through December 1995 has been reviewed and analyzed. The data reflected in this report covers the following personnel: 1) workers, including contract personnel of the Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant; 2) Southern Nuclear Operating Company employees located at corporate headquarters in Birmingham, Alabama; and 3) Southern Nuclear Operating Company support employees located at Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.
The random pool contains not only those badges for unescoded access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the testing pool while on site. Testing during this time period was performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends, and holidays. During this testing period, the rate of testing was equal to 50% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the FFD program, it should be emphasized that the incidents of confirming positive tests were very low. Consequently, management actions relative to determination of FFD have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken.
There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period.
Monthly quality control checks of the Fitness for Duty random pool revealed no major discrepancies from July through October. A computer programming error caused all badged contractors at Farley Nuclear Plant to be dropped from the FFD random testing pool for up to six weeks from 11/06/95 to 12/11/95. The situation was discovered on 12/15/95 and thoroughly investigated. It should be noted that the Continual Behavior i
Observation Program activities were still active during this time. The contractors who were not in the random pool for this period did not have the knowledge that they could not be selected; therefore, the deterrent for substance abuse remained. The programming error was corrected and new procedures put into place to prevent recurrence. As a courtesy, Farley management notified the NRC resident inspector of the error on 12/29/95.
L
- - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - -