ML20100C986
| ML20100C986 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop, Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1985 |
| From: | Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| GO1-85-0055, GO1-85-55, GO3-85-0153, GO3-85-153, NUDOCS 8504010038 | |
| Download: ML20100C986 (4) | |
Text
.
c 1 Y
' ' y - 6., I ',
1 K
4 EcavEn F
Washington Public Power Supply System
. P.O. Box 968 3000GeorgeWashingtonWay Richland, Washington 99352 (509)372-5000 March 20, 1985 E 5 I M 2 2 M' '
.r G01-85-0055 i
G03-85-0153-DOCKET NOS. 50'-460 and 50-508 Mr. J. B. Martin Regional Adninistrator U. S. NRC - Region-V 1450 Marta Lane,' Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Subject:
SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT NOS.1 AND 3 READINESS REVIEWS i
i
References:
- 1) Letter G01-85-0027/G03-85-0057, dated January 31, 1985, same subject.
During the February 15, 1985, meeting at the NRC Region V offices we were requested to submit a tentative schedule of activities and milestones that would encompass the initial phase of the Readiness Reviews at WNP-1 and WNP-3.
We were also asked to make a firm coamitment to the completion of the
- Readiness Reviews.
The commitment and the schedule were needed by the NRC in order to budget appropriate personnel to accomplish the reviews necessary for-c
-the acceptance of the work accomplished to date, at both projects.
The - schedule - of our activities for the next several months is enclosed as
- well as an outline of the expected milestones for the Readiness Reviews.
As _ for our comitment to perform Readiness Reviews at WNP-1 and WNP-3, the i
Supply System fully intends to complete the initial phase of the Readiness i:
Reviews prior to restart of construction.
Our FY-1986 budget contains planning and engineering manpower and expenses for our WNP-3 project, and planning manpower is in the WNP-1 budget since its Readiness Review will not commence until mid-1986.
The budget is based on current knowledge and an understanding of the need to revise the budget as more knowledge is gained, L
as to the extent of manpower and expenses needed to accomplish the reviews.
h i
Two important events will occur in the next six to eight months that have a f
bearing upon the future of the WNP-1 and WNP-3 projects.
One is the Northwest Power. Planning Council's latest revision of the Regional Energy Pl an.
This plan is due for public comment in mid 1985.. The 1983 Energy Plan showed the two plants as available future energy resources.
The Bonneville g
l Power Administration has recently reconmended that restart of construction be delayed for at least two more years.
The Council must now consider these l
plants to be potential resources and is in the process of determining if the L
projects remain a
cost effective future source of
- power, if.that reccamendation is carried out. The Supply System is working with the Council I-l I
A PDR i
M L
v.
t Mr. "J. B. Martin
. Regional Administrator.
- U.-S. NRC - Region V Readiness Reviews-
!Page 2~
and :is providing. cost l. data and addressing the issues of preservation,
- regulatory changes' and other
- inputs used in economic modeling.
The Supply System believes that no concern raised to date will change the 1983 Energy Plan - and that the Council will continue to find.that the projects are required sources of future power.
The -other eventi is. the. BPA Electric Load Forecast which is scheduled to be published, in final form in September, 1985.-
The results of these two studies, we believe, will only result in a better definition of the timing of-the restart.of. construction.
Even if the projects are further _ delved the need - for Readiness Reviews is still. valid,-'since the knowledge that.the 1
projects are acceptable enhances our preservation programs.
[
G. - C.
ensen, Manager Regulatory Programs
Enclosures:
- 1) Near Term Activities
- 2) Readiness Review Schedule cc: Mr. ' J. A. Adams, NESCO Mr. W.. L. Bryan, Washington Water Power Company Mr. T. Kenyon,'NRC - Bethesda, M)
Mr. G. W. Knighton, NRC - Bethesda, MD
- Mr. J. R. Lewis, BPA Mr. R. V. Myers, Pudget Sound Power & Light Company Mr. B. K. Singh, NRC - Bethesda, MD Mr. W. L.:Weislogel, Pacific Power & Light Company Mr. B. D. Withers, Portland General Electric Company Mr. N. S. Reynolds - Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell and Reynolds
I I
_ [h ENCLOSURE 1 NEAR TERM ACTIVITIES April 1985 Meetings e
Preservation Program o
Engineering and Design Review Program Discussion Mgy 1985 Meeting - Walnut Creek Subjects:
e Discussion of Draft Preservation Program e
Initial Draft Engineering and Design Review June 1985 Satsop Meeting e
Present Final Preservation Plan June 1985 Final Draft - Engineering and Design Review Program Submitted to NRC for Comment
' July 1985 Final Preservation Plan Accepted by NRC July 1985 Meeting Subjects:
e Engineering and Design Program Submitted e
Construction and Records Review Program Discussion July 1985 Final Engineering and Design Review Program Accepted by NRC' lt
+
E
o :f k,_ ""
.w ENCLOSURE 2 READINESS REVIEW SCHEDULE Construction and Record' Review
.There will be approximately 13 review packages in construction and records covering-such subjects as:
el Reinforced Concrete e.
- Containment Building e
~ Structural Steel e
Mechanical Equipment Installation o
Piping Systems e
Piping Supports o'
.HVAC e
Cable Installation o
Cable Tray / Conduit Supports
- e-Instrumentation.-- Tubing / Supports and Instruments e
Electrical Equipment Installation e.
- Miscellanous - NDE, Coatings, Soils and Fasteners
-e NSSS
-July' 1985 -. January 1986 Planning o
Develop Sample Selection Criteria e
Gather Inspection Criteria e
Select _ Samples January 1986 - May 1986 Assembly of. Inspectors Inspections of Samples Begin May 1986 Results of first inspection
-package submitted to NRC, Region V.
. August 1986 Results-of the second inspection
' package submitted to NRC, Region V.
Remainder of 1986 & 1987 Submittal of review packages at approximately 1-1/2 to 2 month interval s.
. Engineering and Design There will be a series of reviews conducted covering a cross-section of
. design work that has been accomplished to date.
July 1985 First sample selected for design review.
Review Begins January 1986 Results of first review submitted to NRC, Region V.
Each additional package to be submitted to NRC, Region V at three month intervals.
. ~.
.