ML20100B763

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-MOSBA-97,consisting of Case Number 90-ERA58 Transcript Re Deposition of K Mccoy
ML20100B763
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/11/1995
From:
LABOR, DEPT. OF
To:
References
OLA-3-I-MOSB-97, NUDOCS 9601230124
Download: ML20100B763 (3)


Text

_

'~ '

f- ///p58/9 -V7 Exhibitb1,page \\ of)

DOCKETED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USNRC BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF g Og ALLEN MOSBAUGH,

)

0FFICE OF SECRETAR'

)

00CKETING & EERVIC:~

COMPIAINANT,

)

NO. 90-ERA 58 BRANCH

)

vS.

)

)

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

)

)

RESPONDENT.

)

DEPOSITION OF KENNETH MCCOY taken by Counsel for the Complainant before Judy S. Burnett, Certified Court Reporter at Plant Vogtle, Waynesboro, Georgia on Wednesday, September 12, 1990, commencing at 1:45 p.m.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL 4

FOR THE COMPLAINANT:

FOR THE RESPONDENT:

Mr. Michael D. Kohn Mr. Jesse P. Schaudies, Jr.

KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMAN

& ASHMORE 577 Florida Avenue, NW 127 Peachtree Street, NE Washington, D.C.

Atlanta, Georgia 30313-1810 CULPEPPER REPORTING SI!:RVICE, INC.

551 GREENE STREET - PATIO LEVEL AUGUSTA, GEORGIA 30901 (404) 722-3746 NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSION Docket No. 50-424!425-OLA-3 EXHlBITNO. 7 9601230124 9S1011 in the matter of Georata Power Co. et al.. Voade Units 1 & 2 PDR ADOCK 0500 4

O staff O AppHeant 31Enervonor 0 0ther O identified GReceived O Rejected Reporter D osm2o /n l'W witnee.

Exhibit 2,page 1of 3

)

1 including engineering licensing folks and that sort of thing.

But I think it was ultimately resolved in the 2

1 3

quality concern program.

4 Q.

Doesn't the quality concern program require the 5

resolution to notification to go to the person involved in 6

quality concern?

7 A.

Yes, that's the standard program.

To see if the concern, the person that expressed the concern, was satisfied.

8 9

Q.

If that notice wasn't sent down, then the quality 10 concerns department hadn't finished their investigation.

i 11 Is that what you're saying?

12 A.

'Either that or they've had an oversight in their 13 regular program.

But that's the normal functioning of that 14 program.

I would not know about that notice.

]

15 Q..

Did Mr. Mosbaugh tell you in April of 1990 that he 16 believed there were false statements made in the corrective 17 action letters sent to the NRC?

j 18 A.

I do not remember him directly telling me that.

I 19 was told, I believe, by Bill Shipman that Allen Mosbaugh had 20 expressed that concern.

That's my recollection.

21 Q.

What did you do after you learned about that 22 concern?

23 A.

Actually I think I was out of town of something at 24 the time that was raised and that Bill Shipman and George 25 Hairston responded to that including revising the LER and t

88 -

t CULPEPPER REPO G SERVICE, INC.

l

,page2 of 3 Exhibit 1

ordering a QA audit to be sure that it was completely accurate.

2 Q.

I'm talking about the corrective action letter, not i

3 the LER.

There's a corrective action letter and an LER.

Do 4

you remember learning that there were false statements 5

contained in the corrective action letter?

p 6

A.

What I understand is that Allen brought this up to 7

Bill Shipman.

That he felt that what was in the corrective 8

action letter was in error.

And what was in the LER that was

}'

/):

9 being submitted was also, he thought, in error.

p 10 So as a result of that, they did a QA audit to 11 verify that the LER was correct and we made a statement as I 12 recall in th'e transmittal that said that we wanted to clarify 13 our position on the original letter because there was confusion i

14 about the terms used and that sort of thing.

And so that was 15 attempted to be clarified by the LER.

That's my recollection 16 of it.

17 Q.

Was there ever an investigation as to how false i

18 information got into the corrective action letter or the LER?

t 19 A.

Yes, the QA audit reviewed all of that and i

20 concluded that there were several factors that led to that.

4 21 Q.

Where are the QA audit results?

Were they turned 22 over to the NRC?

t 23 A.

Yes, and we have a QA audit report that they were t

24 provided to the NRC team that investigated that allegation.

25 Q.

That's quality assurance audit?

i f CULPEPPER REPORTING SERVICE, INC.

l l

h

- - -