ML20100B734

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-MOSBA-255,consisting of Re Summary of Discussion W/A Mosbaugh
ML20100B734
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/15/1995
From: Lyon W
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OLA-3-I-MOS-255, NUDOCS 9601220250
Download: ML20100B734 (1)


Text

..-

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Docket No. 50 424/425 OLA-3 EXH:BITNO. *ii 76 f-yM OS /M-2 55 in,,,,,,,,,, o,,,,,,,,,,c,.,o.y,,,m omm,,,

O Staff O Applic

[Nnterwnor O Otner 00CX N O O 'd'"*

  • ind O Rejechd Reporter 6'O o.= C / r M f witn.

Foc e H eu>

gg

/

'95 DCT 20 P4 :41 June 20, 1990 ThismornMjl%5d(v5f[hkd by Allen Mosbaugh.

The following I

summarizennoorPdiscussion.

B!<ANth Allen first inquired into Legs 1' Councils involvement.

He opened by stating, that in earlier times with the Quality Concern Program Legal Council was involved in the Steering Committee, but this had been discontinued; why then were they looking at his issue!

I told Allen that Legal Council had not been totally removed and the option for their use is still in the QCP procedure, that they periodically review concerns.

As an example I told him that although we have closed our investigation, that many cases were still being fought through the courts system and because of this Troutman - Sanders will periodically want a file.

Also as with his case we both know that the NRC are involved and it's normal for Troutman - Sanders to also get involved, such may be the case with his.

He also wanted to know if there was any new developments with his concern.

I told him that the only things I was aware of was, his June memos and George Bockhold request for me to follow-up on his March 15, 1990 commitments, of which I was currently in the process of doing.

Allen stated that as far as he knew, no one ever wrote the REA for an adequate safety evaluation on the ARB.

I told him that this wasn't completely true.

In discussions with Cliff Miller and John Quinn some study work has been done, but he was right and there was no REA.

Allen said that he was surprised by this because George had committed to the NRC to perform the study.

He said that Corporate took on this responsibility.

The NRC like himself were concerned about the design of the ARB.

Allen also commented about Yhe inadequacy of an earlier study.

He did not feel comtortable with it because of the lack of independence.

According to Allen the original ARB study was performed by Paul Hushton and Mark Ajulina.

Both Paul and Mark were aided by George in their placement in SONOPCO.

Their friendship goes way back and they will basically cater to Bockholds needs.

Another problem is that neither Paul or Mark have the knowledge or experience needed for Rad Waste.

He did feel that Lue Long was an expert in this field, but, his assessment of the ARB is tainted because it's based on Rushtons old study.

Allen concluded by saying that he feels that he's having no success in getting this issue resolved; it's as if they (Bockhold) have committed to.something and can't turn around.

9601220250 950915

, h, k Q

PDR ADOCK 05000424 O

PDR