ML20100B731

Intervenor Exhibit I-MOSBA-252,consisting of Audit Finding Rept Safety Audit & Engineering Reivew Re Plant Units 1 & 2 QA Audit of Radwaste Control

ML20100B731
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	09/15/1995
From:	Williams J GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
References
OLA-3-I-MOS-252, NUDOCS 9601220234
Download: ML20100B731 (1)

Text

Z~-/MOSA/9 - U2- @RK NAL.

~

Audit Finding Report Safety Audit and Engineering ReviaW Responsible Partyt t-R.

L. LeGrand AFR No.

['i ' > 7 (j Tracer No.

OP05-89/15 #322 Reconfirmed Previous Finding No.

OQA-89-109 Company / Organization Georgia Power Company oq re-m o e on Project /Ac tMty Plant Vogtle - Units 1 & 2 - QA Audit of Radioactive Waste Control Auditor (s)

(j t 7, Q U

p pgy J.

L.

Willcox

[W E i n ' <

.V:T b t' a N L r1

%noture*

hs Dateh / 9 -1 hll / A Q m

REFERENCE / REQUIREMENTS Title

10CFR50, Appendix B,

Criterion

VII,

" Control of Purchased

Material, Equipment, and Services" states in part that purchased

material, equipment, and services whether purchased directly or through contractors and subcontractors conform to the precurement documents.

These measures shall include provisions, as appropriate for:

a Source evaluation and selection.

b.

Objective evidence of quality furnished by the contractor or subcontractor, c.

Inspection at the contractor or subcontractor source, and d.

Examination of products upon delivery.

Documentary evidence that material and equipment conform to the procurement requirements shall be available at the power plant prior to its installation or use.

This documentary evidence shall be 4

sufficient to identify the specific requirements,such as

codes, standards, or specifications, met by the purchased material and equipment.

FINDING Contrary to the above reference, a filter system manufactured by FAVA Control

System, Inc.

was placed in service in the Liquid Waste Processing System without undergoing the normal procurement process.

This action resulted in the equipment not meeting the above listed requirements.

RECOMMENDED ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.

Determine root cause.

2.

State actions to correct this item.

3.

State actions to prevent recurrence.

CCRRECTIVE ACTION REVIEW / VERIFICATION Tc as w~ se ro r,**s mNosHs,, m o,sa, re s Trose r *V0W"6 re !;due"c- ""**'UT*'u T" * *

%d Wou ra. d Aor.u.sv %sreve

>=o s. a c o st s A *Ja A % L CD A CJ ro.a.

Atoc arso nsu 4..,.r m 4 o s. a,n.:,, r m.,. r.o s, =,-

-r o m.

N.ec eso se,e v, ce >,

COJsM car ~r*MAy sons un woedR,t1 Potoc.artzo HA s OceN vinr<,rg oar oo: sc ar a,eg, j

Arneo Signature:

k/dM fh 8I.

m Date:

HV l

9601220234 950915 PDR ADOCK 05000424 l

0 PDR AamAi t

f 8

k-t V

b i

t

?

e I

i I

i e

.s -

+

l I

i i

n I

' NUCt. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Docket No. 50-4241425-Ot.A-3 '

EXHIBIT NO. T ' 7i V in ihe maner of poornia Poww co. et 4. voas. Un!ts 1 a 2 O statt O 4.:acent rgnerv== 0 Otar

- O Identmed Mved ' O R$chd Reportw fP

.Om 4/IfI9< 'www __ Zock 4et O-

>