ML20099L265

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Applicant Exhibit A-171O,consisting of LER Text Continuation
ML20099L265
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/1995
From:
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
References
OLA-3-A171O, NUDOCS 9512200261
Download: ML20099L265 (2)


Text

u....... w.

  • f*6D- @ V y'25 - CLA 3 b / 7/ Q 4h.. a./45

' ~ u ~~u LlcENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI

$e"*,'.',*,o't*cM,U".!lff,',, *?"",J,' '.".".,'."'!

TEXT CONTINUATION

!?,7A*.ST.'.*f5?J*!'d!"c"',M'i Sf!

00CKETED

.O..M....W. ~'N...n'.O.. 'dc,.! P, # 'a. !.'a V

i.

..,.~.a,

u.....

VEGP - UNIT 1

'95 0CT 20 P3 :00

  • C 1

0 $ ! d,

' o ls l o l o l o l4 l2 g4 9l0 0 p l6 0%

0l6 or rw,,-.

, e w

.nm OF ICE (

SECRFTARY E=

Durin REs enfatest run of the DG on 3-30-90, one of the Eg switc es (TS firipWdandwouldnotreset. This appeared to be an intermitt nt a ilure >ecause it subsequently mechanically reset.

This switch and the leaking switch (TS-19112) were replaced with new switches. All subsequent testing was conducted with no additional problems.

A test of the jacket water system temperature transient during engine starts was conducted. The purpose of this test was to determine the i

actual jacket water temperature at the switch locations with the engine in a normal standby lineup, and then followed by a series of starts without air rolling the engine to replicate the starts of 3-20-90. The test showed that jacket water temperature at the switch location decreased from a standby temperature of 163 degrees F to approximately 156 degrees F and remained steady.

Numerous sensor calibrations (including jacket water temperatures),

special pneumatic leak testing, and multiple engine starts and runs /b '8N#N were performed under various conditions. After th: 3--20 90 rient,(the vere ' control systems of both engines + hr/e 6:Or subjected to a comprehensive test program. -Eut::quent t; t'+.h--tett pr;; rem, 001 A :nd 0010 h:= 5::n started :t -lea:t--!! ti :: :::h :nd n: failur : cr pr:51::: S:n

urred dur "; any ef there st: rte.

!= additten, :n underveltage si;rt-test with;ut-tir rell was conducted n 4-0 00 ;nd 001A -sterted

nd ?::ded proper?y.'

M4er-cornp/ch of the confo/ foyiG

+cet se.p ence, a n u n de r vo Hag 6 -fe.sf Was pedorm ed,.

fnc.luding 4he undervoMage feds e.ach enyne has been j

.suc. cess-Tully.S}arled eleven hes wNh no skri

-failures.

Based on the above facts, it is concluded that the jacket water high temperature switches were the most probable cause of both trips on i

3-20-90.

E.

ANAL.YSIS OF EVENT 4

The loss of offsite power to Class lE bus IBA03 and the failure of DG1A to start and operate successfully, coupled with DGlB and RAT IB being out of i

service for maintenance, resulted in Unit I being without AC power to both Class 1E busses. With both Class 1E busses deenergized, the RHR System i

could not perform its required safety function. Based on a noted rate of rise in 'the RCS temperature of 45 degrees F in 36 winutues, the RCS water would not have been expected to begin boiling until approximately I hour and 36 minutes after the beginning of the event.

I Restoration of RHR and closure of the containment equipment hatch wed completed well within the estimated I hour and 36 minutes for the projected onset of boiling in the RCS. A review of inforsation obtained from the l

Process and Effluent Radiation Monitoring System (PERMS) and grab sample analysis indicated all normal values. As a result of this event, no increase in radioactive releases to either the containment or the

,l environment occurred.

l 9512200261 950906 PDR ADOCK 05000424 92 PRCUECT 057495 0

PDR y

i

_,'6 gh f il l4 y a3 s

Q:{

ll'Aa eq, t=g iff :]$

L a.t

-