ML20099K987

Forwards Jan & Feb 1985 Monthly Rept,Per 730323 Memorandum & Order ALAB-106 & Amend 1 of Cp.Rept Includes Bechtel Nonconformance Repts,Quality Action Requests,Mgt Corrective Action Repts & Quality Audit Findings

ML20099K987
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	03/15/1985
From:	Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	Deyoung R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
32201, ALAB-106, NUDOCS 8503200438
Download: ML20099K987 (41)

Text

~

Consumers Power i Presid

- Projects, Engineering and Construction General Offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, MI 49201 e (517) 788 0453 March 15, 1985 Director of Office of Inspection and Enforement Att Mr Richard C DeYoung US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 MIDLAND PROJECT - ALAB-106 MONTHLY REPOR1 FOR JANUARY & FEBRUARY, 1985 DOCKET NOS 50-329 AND 50-330 FILE:

0.4.6 SERIAL

32201

Reference:

1) Letter, J W Cook to H R Denton, Miscellaneous Licensing Issues, Serial 31655, dated September 11, 1984

2) Letter, D G Eisenhut to J W Cook, Request for Deferral of Miscellaneous Licensing Matters During Construction Shutdown, dated February 5, 1985 In accordance with Condition of Memorandum and Order ALAB-106, dated March 23, 1973, and Amendment No 1 of the Midland Plant Construction Permit, enclosed are five copies of the following documents written or closed during the month; Bechtel Nonconformance Reports, Quality Action Requests, Management Corrective Action Reports, Quality Audit Findings; Babcock & Wilcox Reports of Nonconformity; Consumers Power Company Nonconformance Reports, Audit Finding Reports, Quality Action Requests, Corrective Action Reports, and Management Corrective Action Requests / Reports.

Reference 1 requested that the requirement to submit ALAB reports be deferred until such time as the project is restarted. We acknowledge that Reference 2 advises us that relief from this reporting requirement should be pursuant to a 10 CFR 50.90 filing. Until such time a filing is made or other relief is grated, we will continue to send the reports, a m s /*' M JWC/WRB/lr CC JGKeppler, USNRC Region III (w/ enc) 9 OC0385-0027A-MP02 8 i

m m-s INDEX OF ATTACHMENTS ALAB-106 MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 1985 Bechtel Nonconformance Reports '- None Bechtel-Quality Action Requests - None Bechtel-Management Corrective Action Reports - None Bechtel Quality Audit Findings - None Babcock & Wilcox Reports of Nonconformity - None

Consumers Power Company Nonconformance Reports - Q-00001, Opened 1/4/85 Q-00002, Opened 1/14/85 Q-00004, opened 1/23/85 Consumers Power Company Audit Finding Reports - None Consumers Power Company. Quality Action Requests - None Consumers Power Company Corrective Action Reports - None LConsumers Power Company Management Corrective Action Request / Reports - None

~

W 9

f OC0385-0027A-MP02

r

~

rJ INDEX OF ATTACHMENTS ALAB-106 MONTHLY REPORT FEBRUARY 1985 Bechtel Nonconformance Reports - None

~ 1Bechtel Quality Action Requests - None

__Bechtel Management Corrective Action Reports - None

-Bechtel Quality Audit Findings - None Babcock &-Wilcox Reports of Nonconformity - None Consumers Power Company Nonconformance Reports - Q-00003, Opened 2/15/85 Q-00005, Opened 2/11/85 Q-00006, Opened 2/11/85 Q-00007, Opened 2/11/85 Q-00008, Opened 2/12/85 Q-00009, Opened 2/12/85 Q-00011, Opened 2/26/85 Q-00012, Opened 2/26/85 Q-00004, closed 2/6/85 Q-00010 Closed 2/20/85 Consumers Power Company Audit Finding Reports - None

. Consumers Power Company Quality Action Requests - None Consumers Power Company Corrective Action Reports - None Consumers Power Company Management Corrective Action Request / Reports - None e

m OC0385-0027A-MP02

a am waus- - -4 w

a-4 A-as a-au-e me--s

w-aa-A s a- < 4-W 4s - di -

,s

.s,-,5-,,, -. w a b m u x s, sam a-a 4

t e

a L

4

' I

-l e

l 4 '

i 4 -

r i

I h.

7 i

4 I

i.

k i

I 4

f t -

F 4

[

t L

t

+

I i,

Opened January 1985 i

)

6 i

?

i e

t l

I i

l.

I s

p I

i.

l' h

k t

15 NCR NO.

17 REV 0-00001 0

QUALITY ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION 1/4/85 NONCONFORMAhCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1

0F 2

QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION Warehouse #1, Level "A" Storage 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 PAltT NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

N/A N/A 9-82-004 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION

~ Q-G ?%.*: '[L?

,..- r,,.n n.; 7

r~a "

8u Jad k' *' " -'

Bendix Hydro-thermograph

j., y g5

<.e2 Model #594 Bechtel Power Corporation Instrument #4223 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED QAPP for the Shutdown Phase N/A N/A of the Midland Energy Center, Policy 12 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION SM-1.70 2

Warehouse and Salvage 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

YES X

NO N/A 12 REQUIREMENT QAPP for the. Shutdown Phase of the Midland Energy Center - Policy #12, " Control of Measuring and Test Equipment," Section 1.0 requires that measuring and test equipment used to establish conformance to criteria are identified, controlled, calibrated and adjusted to maintain accuracy, i

13 NONCONFORMANCE The Bendix Hydro-thermograph in Warehouse #1, Level "A" Storage area is out-of-calibration as of 1/3/85.

l 14 NCR ORIGINATED BY k/

f

/- d-b DATE I

D A Nott 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X

NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED ARE ITEM SECREGATED YES X

NO N/A 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVIE B,Y:

M4 7 b'I REPORTABILITY gg YES X NO 3

l DATE:

/- - 8 S' 22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD ASSURANCE ENGINEERING l

DATE:

N/A QA-6 Rev 0 1

1

M JJS d-nnco/

e v v

26 CAUSE 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED I

lYES l

l NO 28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION l

l REWORK l

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

l YES l

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

...,, u n 5,- m a r m ; y c%4 mUa

[g

.._.s 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE l

l ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN l

33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l

l ACCEPTABLE I

l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER l

A.N.I.

(ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0

15 NCR NO.

17 REV

~

QUALITY-Q-00002 0

ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION January 14, 1985 NONCONPORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 2

QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION N/A.

2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

N/A N/A N/A 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Procedures for the Shutdown Phase of the Midland Energy Center:

EN-002

" Corrosion Monitoring" CD-001

" Requirements for Soils Remedial Work" EN-003

" Configuration Control" CD-002

" Material Storage and Handling" EN-004

" Classification of Structures, PR-002

" Procurement" Systems and Components"

-6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED Quality Assurance Program g

N/A

-Plan (QAPP) 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION JAMooney, MEC Site; e nard, Qua M y Assurances N/A RJErhardt, Engineering 4

11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

3 pgj Tgy n 3 A yvtp '! p: v.y//

4 YES X NO s

J hr.

w. aa... - s u...:.. a n.c 12 REQUIREMENT QAPP, Policy 5. " Instructions, Procedures and Drawings" Section 1.1 requires: " Activities affecting quality are accomplished in accordance with documented instructions."

QAPP, Introduction, Section 5.0 requires: "This QAPP is implemented on October 1, 1984 with full compliance by January 1, 1985."

13 NONCONFORMANCE Contrary to the above, the subject procedures were not approved as of Jcnuary 11, 1985.

These procedures address safety related activities that are ongoing 4

during the Shutdown Phase of the Midland Energy Center.

It is recognized that there have been extenuating circumstances such as:

limited resources, slow response time during comment cycle, and higher priority for Shutdown activities that affect the Company's financial condition.

It is also recognized that these procedures will document, not change, the methods by which these activities are parformed.

This condition is, however, in 14 R ORIGIN TED BY l

noncompliance with the QAPP and action needs to j

/p b,

/

b2 taken to correct the condition on a priority f44:

basis.

/DATE I

19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED YES X NO N/A 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 R, VI (

f REPORTABILITY g -

[

DATE:

/

b 22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION READ, ASSURANCE 'ENG EERING N/A N/A p,) -

DATE:

QA-6 Rev 0 I

i 1

NcR Q-00002 P g, 2 f-g g 26 cAusg 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l

l YES l

l NO 28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION I

l REWORK l

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

l YES l

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE E5GINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l

l ACCEPTABLE l

l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.

(ASME)

DATE l

IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0

CR Q-0000h This NCP was opened 1/23/85 and closed 2/6/85

.Tt is contained with the closed items in February's recort.

c.-

9 i

4 Opened February 1985

15 NCR NO.

17 REV QUALITY n-nnnn1

/ -*- N2 ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION

- ; 7 -;n at u./w 7,//s'/Af NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1

0F' 9 QAD FORM 1 1

ITEM LOCATION Auxiliary Building, Floor F9, Area 3, Elevation 685 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 FART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

OVE-63B N/A N/A 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Make up Air Electric Heating Coil 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED OGLH M-485, Revision 22 N/A 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION N/A N/A Maintenance Department 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

YES X

NO N/A L2 REQUIREMENT Mechanical Equipment list in Tech. Spec. M-485, Revision 22 identifies QVE-63B as being Q-listed.

p g.7,,,.3 b [a ',) /,

• C ^.i. % s', 1J.

L-13 NONCONFORMANCE Maintenance Order 0-AHV-22400699-9 identified the equipment as non-Q.

Due to equipment being designated as such, the M.O. was not routed to QAD for review and inclusion of cny witness / hold points.

C# x p ati

-o.-L -a; r fm..

J i;Lvvi QA" Lmios uv i i f i mL.

t f,

l'ffer 14 NCR ORIGINATED BY This NCR supersedes NCR A-00282 g

gg gf

'D A"r E 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X

NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED YES X

NO N/A 7

VIgBY: ~

21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 2

R REPORTABILITY fwc;c.

g's ml$ s

.o YES Y No

}

1lg g i

22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE.

25 SECTION HEAD, AS 'URANCE EAGINEERING DATE:

__ /_

/ f QA-6 Rev 0

/

[f'

/ /

Q-00003 pega 2 of 2 26 CAUSR

.t.

1 l

27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRE I

IYES l

l NO 28 REC 000 ENDED DISPOSITION I

IREWORK I

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

l USE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

l YES l

l NO CR NO.

30 -ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

-31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEEAING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN k

t I

33 METNOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY l

j RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION ACCEPTABLE I

l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE ACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0

d2 - 0 0 0 0 S A'N qngtzz ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED V/$

DIVISION

-:,0

/ - F S win NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE l

OF 1 QAD FORM 1 1

ITEM LOCATION WAREHOUSE 1 AE 2 DRAWING 0R PART NO. AND REV.

3 PART NJNE 4 SERIAL NO. 4081Tl NGRif2' 3

R05EM0tlNT 808355,uoaggs,nos,s7, N. /A TRAN56MTTERS

• es7&v.uoa7cs. aca76i. Nos767 3

tum DESCRIrTION

\\l53 5ERIES B TRAN5MIT TE KS CPC0 PU RCHh5E ORDERS *, Solo-SC6?-QA SQQ-5402-GA, SoID-53iB-QA BECHTEL PURCHASE ORDERS: 7220- T-2N5AC; ITEM M.5; 2FT-O440 A' B,C Z D AED # 2I71S' 6

ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED N/A GA-G REV.0 No 10 CTION ORGANIZATION FAditiTtE5 AND MATERIAL 5 D/ VISION 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV N/A 11 ACTIVITY HOLD RE UIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER H0.

YES NO 12 REQUIREMENT $((JlQg y,2,2 gf fgQ({pyR{ QA.6 REEC STATE 5 IN f

i PART:'WHEN A NONG0NFoRMANCE 15 REPORTED TO OR DETECTED '

1 BY QAD PERSONNEL, QAD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:

d. DOCUMENTING NONCONFORMANCE OR A NCR LAPPENDIX A)"

g y,,,3

. a u w u u u..

u.,

i 13 NONCONFORMANCE A COPY OF A PART 21 NOTICE WA5 RECEl t/E D BY CPC0 FROM ROSEMoUNT INC.

INDlLATING A POTENTIAL LEAK PA TH IN THE SEAL OF THE THREA DS BETWEEN THE SENSOR MBBULE AND THE ELECT RONICS HouslNG ON II53

\\

SERIE5 8 TRAhl5MITTERS MANUFACTURED AND SHIPPED l

A F TE R.

JA N UA RV lo l'1SH.

THESE UN IT.5 A RE IDENTIFIED

ASoVE, (REFERENCE, PAGES 2-G OF L4 NCR ORIGINATED BY THI5 NCR.)

f fetY d - $ h a.n u r

DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREJATED 1 YES NO WAREHOUSE 2

HOLD A REAg 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 N REVIEW EPORTABILI t--

NO:

g 0

/v2~

t

,,g YES l

22 DL INED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAIV SS

'E,ENGINEE l

YES N0 sa

</

4 N' ' M" 7'/ K,

./

DATE w,

n

/ / c[e4 7'#

04-Thts (^JM (2specm To mG US o

7 PROCESS CORRICTIVE ACTION REQUIRED I

l YES l

l NO 8 RECCISIIND E DISPOSITION I

IREWORK I

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REFAIR I

l USE AS IS 9 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEED E l

lYES I

l NO CR NO.

O ADDITIONAL INisiMATION 1 DISTRIBUTION CONCumA BCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURADCE DATE DCINEERINC DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 2 DISPOSITION ACTION TARB 1 -hain0D OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATL ACCEFTABLE, REFE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N. I. ( ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED

. Rev 0

23 m -+ ;t = -2 u

(.\\..

g TCiordine, P24-608,.3dQ aa e aiy ao Cgism Date october 1s, 19s' OCTI 01!84 COMPANY Subject WCWCONFORMING MATERIAL NUCMAR UCEH54HG Internal Correspondence TCS 84-21 CC Tf2mMolph, J1 Tope, DCC: A200-73*10*02 DNaadeWalle 73*20*06 l

The attached letter from Rosemont to our Purchasing Department identifies a l

potential problem with 1153 Series B transm itters shipped after January 10, 1984. A previous letter, dated September 1 0, 1984 specified that there is a possibility that a leak path through the ti ansmitter tm ains could cause the instrument to stop functioning during postulated accident conditions. Please verify that nonconforming material reports have been initiated for those 1153 series 3 transmitters received via th a referenced purchase orders.

i o-ae-e

~ a u w&s W%

% 0.) reca,W

& a 90 was

.302o, Qm ML

/& g/ s & M 72<.

sr>,A a W L

/MidH.

c n w w do u cm, Lt a De&4, a a <+ndLJ w recerwl + q u mA-a, sehr/w C.'d

?~ ?...... _ -,

J

.i s w & J-IC10854060A-NLO4

- a e.

(

lll" ""' '"' *"' - o u...

minsei som I _

TWK ete 876 3tel TELEX 3D e183 l.

i i

l Rosemount-l r

~

et l

October 2. 1984 l

Purchasing Agent Consumers Power Co.

1 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson. MI 49201 1

l

Subject:

10 CFR Part 21 Notification Letter dated September 10, 1984 gs.-

.:s-- '

Reference:

1)YourPurchaseorderNumber

. 5010,5.3.19. -5402, -5569..1005-3030

2) Rose nount Order Number 413589. 413588. 41358f,~416456 74 Gentlemen:

This is a follow-up to the above notification which will provide j

you with the serial numbers / tag num%rs of those transmitters that may be affected by this potential problem.

The enclosed listing identifies the 1153 Series 8 transmitters which were manufactured and shipped after January 10, 1984.

I Again, the notification applies to only those 1153 Series 8 transmitters manufactured after January 10. 1984, and those units installed in an environment subject to a LOCA or HELB.

Currently we are in an extensive evalu'ation and test program tn determine the esuse cf the let.h path.

Again, en:c the cause is identified, a corrective action will be established.

We expect the results of our testing to be available in approximately two weeks. Another status letter will be sent to you at that time.

p...s

'a

.~'

m-ar

. t w. 2, w '.

..,;,:.> g,

Jd

.,,t 1.:

u.. a

,M j

Very truly yours, l

('- t f*$.

y R.C. LaSell v

/

Manager ik h

$?Eh l DCT c,gg{g4

/njk 5

JAC!:so t.-

Enclosurepgp x p'r clie AE. A!'d*Tf.

PUncl.pa,l,~

e-x-M ge: n.I]ndo/pA (4)

.%&:.h *r.

Q "

J..zefass,2 x

~

,, ci (,,<.ch

ATTACHMENT A P.O. #

H.O. #

Yao i Serial #

5010-5569-QA 413587 N/A 408951 5010-5402-QA 413588 N/A 408952 413588 W/A 408953 5010-5318-QA 413589 N/A 408955 413589 N/A 408956 A15589 5/A 408957

~

3005-3030-QA 416456 N/A.

408972 416456 N/A 408973 416456 N/A 409189 0

N "

• E

'}

s g

j{

N'.

• U df k A

' } [

u,

..L is ib**n

6. u ' 27 s

s Q L 6atL ' 4 4 J-S3 a scGL A s__ a q

D* N-% %g h.

u 3

r h' OCT ' E' i

I?.)

f I4

~~

'E),

CDs N

i

~

13g01 was Fem guest V

seen puun.uwesosen sassa u.s.A.

7319129418085 TWR 91m3143 TELEX 3D 0183 "I4. wood 6 iG v Ff Rosemount-October 2. 1984 Mr. V.A. Anderson. Director of Purchasing Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201

Subject:

10 CFR Part 21 Notification. Letter dated September 10. 1984

Reference:

1) Your Purchase order Number 7220-J-245-AC l

2) Rosemount Order Number 410965 Gentlemen:

l

\\

\\

l This is a follow-up to the above notification which will provide you with the serial numbers / tag numbers of those transmitters i

that may be affected by this potential problem.

The enclosed j

listing identifies the 1153 Series B transmitters which were manufactured and shipped after January 10. 1984.

Again, the notification applies to only those 1153 Series B i

transmitters manufactured after January 10. 1984 and those units installed in an environment subject to a LOCA or HEL8.

Currently we are in an extensive evaluation and test program to detemine the cause of the leak path. Again, once the cause is identified, a corrective action will be established.

We expect the results of our testing to be available in approximately two weeks. Another status letter will be sent to you at that time.

l Very truly yours.

'[

~~9 I '~' V

~

' ~ '

.-a.

,c..

f./. ob, s y R.C. LaSell u

Manager I

/njb Enclosure cc: Mr. R.C. Bauman 1

t

y_ _ _

..o.

I l

ATTAQ8Elli A t

Purchase Order flo. 7220-J-245-AC i

llosemount Order flo. 410965 t

r i

Tae ilumber Serial Ilumber 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-0440A 408764 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-04408 408765 7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-0440C 408766 i

7220-J-245AC; Item 4.5;2FT-04400 408767 I

l I

I L

t l

l f

9 T;; P C;,., v,5 " '"~ "- 1

, [r, ~ #

,3.

I. J w

i '/,,

v'":

+>

w

.3.

I i

l l

t

\\

I l

f i

E

'15 NCR NO.

17 REV Qt'ALITY 0-00006 0

ASSURANCE =

16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION 2-11-85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 1 QAD F0EM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION Auxiliary Building - Elevation 646'-0 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

NA Nitrogen Pressure Gages NA 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Auxiliary Building Safeguard Chiller Units IVM-59A, IVM-59B, 2VM-59A and 2VM-598 Nitrogen Pressure Cages i

i l

6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 RzrznENCE DOCiinr.m 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED i

Quality Assurance Program Pla s NA MO-00580 rev 0 NA l

i l9 INSFECTION l'LAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION I

MO-00580 0

Operations & Maintenance Division i

11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

l YES X

NO l

12 REQUIREMINT 1.

Quality Assurance Program Plan Policy #12 rev 0, Paragraph 2.5 states in part,

" Measuring and test equipisent is calibrated at specified intervals."

j t

.v, m.or q mm+

b. m p p o r'd sM U.a h.4 ' i:\\ 5 o w MS O

L 13 NONCONFORMANCE NOTE: Reference MPQAD NCRs C-05727 & C-0528 Contrary to the above the labels attached to each of the four gages shows the gages to

[

have an expired calibration due date.

Equip. ID Serial #

Cal. Due Date IVM-59A BPC-1358 11-9-84 l

IVM-59B BPC-1365 11-9-84

[

2VM-59A BPC-1353 11-9-84 1

NCR IGINArmu BY t

2VM-595 BPC-1437 11-9-84

<W Z-it-66 i

lQ-DATE 19 BOLD TAGS AFFLIED l YES NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TACS OR SEc8?cATED AREA i

f ITEM SECREGATE YES 1 N0 c....

21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 N Rzy B

gM O

REPORTABILITY l

$5 AB 25 SECTION H

, AS CE ENGm ING i

DETERMINED TO BE REFY01 22 A

g/g n

Mw Dm, QA-6 Rev 0 I

i

0-00006 rev 0 name 2 of 2 12 6 CAUSE i

i i

27 FROCRSS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRE I

lTES l

l NO 28 RRCG01END E DISPOSITION l

l REWORK I

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

lUSE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

lTES I

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCUREDCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURADCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TALD 33 METE S OF DISPOSITION ACTION FERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION ACCIFTABLE UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE ACCIFTABLE, RE SUPERS EING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED Qh-6 Rev 0

'15 NCR NO.

17 REV QUALITY 0-00007 0

ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION 2-11-85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 2

QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION MEC onsite M&TE Calibration lab t

2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

MP-1 Mini-Pulser 433 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Mini-Pulser Cal. ID #8325-01198 J

6 ITEM STARTUF SYSTEM NO.

7 RarznENCE DOGinmal 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED i

i NA IS-I-27 rev 1-A NA I9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTI63 C.U.*NIZATION NA y & LS.S. Woodby 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITT HOLD ORDER NO.

j YES 3 NO IIA 12 REQUIRDENT Equipment MP-1 is supposed to generate a pulse height of 10 volts.

t!psq.s'f D G T." [h 7.7, T ] [:"('O T I du w 3 o :k:.. - :. t s 3' "

U i

13 NONCONFORMANCE Equipment MP-1 is generating a pulse height of 10 millivolts.

NOTE: M&TE usage record page one for 8325-01198 shows no Q activities performed with this equipment.

14 ACR ORIGINATE BY i

f DEE W// C 19 EOLD TAGS APPLIED YES 1 NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SECREGATE AREA ITEM SECREGATE 1 YES NO j

w rr 1.h 21 NEE TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR R EU REPORTABILITY f

f YES 2 No 3

/

DATE:

M" 8 #

fING 22 Dzamari1NE TO BE REF6miABLE 25 SECTION HEAD. ASS C

C TES NO MA

) / P' /

l 1

DATE:J/"//TU / //

I i

QA-6 Rev 0 i

l

. - - - - - - - - -.. ~.. -.., _,,. _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Q-00007 rav 0 pean 2 of 2 12 6 CAUSE 1

27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED I

I TES I___

l NO

" ' ~

25 REC 000lIND E DISPOSITION l

IRINDRE I

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l RDAIR l

lUSE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEED E l

lTES I

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISTRIBUTI0ll CONCURRENCE ACTI(El ORGANIZATI0ll DATE QAD CONCURRMCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTIO11 TAK5 33 naam00 0F DISPOSITICII ACTION vamIFICATIGl NCR CLOSED BT RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION YERIFICATION i

kCCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE ACCEPTABLE. RR SUPERS E ING NCR NUMBER A.N.I. (ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRE QA-6 Rav 0 e

}

( *,,.

l

'15 NCR NO.

17 REV i

QUALITY 0-00008 0

l ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSDED DIVISION 2-12-85 t

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 4",

QAD FORM 1 US#

d 1 IT M LOCATION Warehouse #2 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

P.O. 5008-3634-OA Item 11 Studs Heat #8095577 5 IT M DESCRIPTION l

3 h - 8x24" SA193 B7 A/T Studs, Quantity-4 Trace letter H21 NOTE: The attached customer certification identified the stude as 26" long. This length was listed erroneously on the attached C of C.

(Per Marlene Davis of Cardinal's QA department.)

6 ITEM STARTUF SYSTEM NO.

7 RzrzmDCE DOCITnr.m 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRE 1

l NA QA-6 Revision 0 No 9 INSFECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA Facilities and Materials Division 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

TES 1 NO 12 REQUIREMENT i

Section 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 Revision 0 states in part:

"When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible fors... d. Documenting nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"

7 -..

4..,, -,, p

.z.,_,,,,,

.u c.u J w

" L'

.. u. 2:.u :: :.

13 NONCONFORMANCE 4

A copy of A Part 21 Notice was received by CPCo from Cardinal Industrial Products Corporation indicating that four of thirty two studs received on the above P.O.

(item 11) may not have received the required ultrasonic examination.

l 14 NCR ORIGINATE BY D

2-//- f~5

/

DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIG YES 1 NO 20 LOCATION OP HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATE AREA ITEM SEGREGAT E 1 YES NO Unrahaume #2 Hold Area 21 NE S TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR EVI,5W BFj REPORTABILITY John

/02 -

~

, //, g y YES NO o

s Ernie W. Coold [ y[v SECTION HEAD,' ASS E

Gin 22 DETERMIN E TO BE REPORTABLE 25 v YES NO DATE:

Y QA-6 Rev 0 o

0-00008 came 2 of 5 12 6 CAUSE i

i 27 PROCESS CORRECTIYR ACTI0tt REQUIRED l

lYES l

l NO 28 REC 009 ENDED DISPOSITION I

l REWORK I

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

lUSE AS IS 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

l YES l

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31 DISIKrnUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED l

32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN l

l 1

l 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l

l ACCEPTABLE l

l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.

(ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0

Ps 'z er$1/s

%p

.e-.

L. a r ciire a e

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION PAGE 1

e as -

s ve.as ao

-. e e cnaaeo. u.ses.o.toJ'Ine e, es..e..m e, w rm sooe.-

rats: m

r-aw a w v -. b.1-CUSTOMER CERTIFICATION CUSTOMER NO.- 7882006 e

CONSUMERS POWER CORP CERT NO. : 0020969 MIDLAND PLANT OPERATIONS CERT DATE: 03/16/03 SHPD DATE 03/16/93 3500 E.

MILLER ROAD C. I. NO. : 0029794 MIDLAND. MICH 40640 CUST. P.O.NO.

5008-3634-GA C. I. P. ITEM NO. : 011 GTY ORDERED:

32 CUST PO ITEN NO. 011

a.......................... =... =... =................... G T Y Sl# D :

4

........c......

CER TIFICATION FOR ITEM: 3 1/2-8X26" SA193 87 A/T STUDS HEAT NO: 8095577 TR ACE. LTR. : H21 oo........................................................-

j CHEMISTRY LISTING

/

.C

.410 Cr

.990*

Mn

.92d' Mo

.200' P

.009

.S1

. 240

S

.022 '

'...........u.............sm.........................

.se....

......e

• • PHYSICALS **

<< SUB SIZE >>

TENSILE STRENGTH: 137000 PSI /

YIELD STRENGTH:

114000 PSI'

% ELONGATION: 20.

IN 2 INCHES,,

. =......................................

... /. R DC T N OF AR E A : 56.1 /

.* HARDNESS **

ENDING HARNDE 285.

BHN ar d.....

............SS...................r...................sr.ur..ar(

• • HEAT TREAT DATA **

TEMPER TEMP 1100 p TIME MIN. TEMP.

MEDIA

• • CHARPY IMPACT DATA **

q 68.

F IMPACT STRENCTH MILLS LTRL EXPAN.

7. SHEAR AREA

-}

TEST 1 62.

41.

33 TEST ?

63.

30.

3 TES' ?

73.

50.

20 AVERAGE 66.

4 19 v..=.re,s--,,,.......-......,...... 3,

CNT!NUFD to pAGE 2

Pc, ZafgN j.sn l

s

= O w S

• 4 f A L PR ODt.C T S CORPOR A TION

""U d

'.':,.'1IN* E ::

y,;

., y per

.m.

g.i @@ L a a2. uuud U bef W I

CUSTOMER CERTIFICATION CERT NO.. 0028969 CVS*OMER NO. 7802586 CONSUMEGS POWER CORD CERT DATE: 03/16/03 FIDLAND P.ANI UPERATIONS SHPD DATE- 03/16/83 t

3500 E.

MittER ROAD C. I. NO. 0028796 41 CL ANO, MICH 48640 C.I.P. ITEM NO. 011

/'. D. O. NO.

SOO9-3634-GA GTY ORDERED

• 32 GTY SHPD-4 a - -

• r v s z a a 3, s u r a m m m m m m m mmmm mmmm m mmmm m mmmmmm mmmm mm mmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwammemou CtkTIFICATION FOR ITEM 3 1/2-8X26" SA193 B7 A/T STUDS HEAT NO.

8095577 TRACE LTR.H21

=w=rs============================ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmag PER CPC SPEC. AC QUALITY ASSURANCE INGU!RY NO. 04346 DEW ASME B A, PV CODE SECTION III, CLASS 1, 1980 EDITION THRU WINTER 1981 ADDENDA.

10CFR21 APPLIES.

HEAT TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATION.

SA614, PARAGRAPHS RU. RW AND RZ ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS ORDER.

THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTED AND ULTRASONIC INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION V, ARTICLE 7 (FOR MAGENTIC PARTICLE) AND SECTION V.

ARTICLE 5 (FOR ULTRASONIC) OF THE ASME D 4 PV CODE AND FOUND ACCEPTADLE TO SA-614. PARAGRAPHS RW AND RZ.

INSPECTOR CERTIFIED TO ASNT-TC-A1, LEVEL II.

rHIS MATERIAL WAS SUPPLIED AND PRODUCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DATED

'ANUARY 22, 1982, REV.

3.

WHICH MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF

. ' A -3000 r ANSI N45 2.

4 AK'sE ARODUCT HA3 BEEN SUPPLIED PER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF 4 :~A'*ICAL ENGINEERS.

l 1.b L-11/

$.h.---------

AUTNORIZED AGENT.

b5 EC! n N

m ----

-,. o r. _

ogi ! E. tard l

l

Mi37cI f Q"($

(,"

CF 17.2 i)Ro. file REPORTING DEFECTS /NON-CONFORMANCES g

10CFR PART 21 7rq xwmr

.YgMgp3.....Y* Q* [* * * = * = =

kN k

Customer..

No. [ N."3 h.t.T.h.k LineItem#(s)....N.............

P. O.

C.I. No... M.D b.........

Line Item # (s).....I.'.............

Na teria1 Deseri e tion. 3.'/O.B. X. M.".. S&.t9.3. 89. het.Sh4s.

. An.k..?. 6A 9. 55.1.7...T.w.. L f.c..U.&J...Cr.vk. *. ?A M.

..Rt.f.. +......T. ei A>. l.. er.h.e. t... u.i t..s.. 3.2,..................

oe f ee t No ted...H).s.. p.tv.. m b.l.c...+.o.. huh..+.M...l.4rm.c e-u

.h sk.. rmrk..lHx)...br..+.W.e...t. p.tw.. >.4..t.4 e..

.GthR..h..ok.. pap.ct!..k1hk..au:4..Ae..M w. 6!..t.k.<..

I

.fak...@.t.s. p sv.%. <. ?.l.*.m..w.c.e.g.. f.o.s.r...npp)?.e.a. ??.o.n 54 his e u

of ac%

We should kko.

Disposition:

Reportable i

To Customer:

Yes.......No.......

/

si s n ed... %wia. C... JJv......... oa t e...S ep.t.d4J.tB.t

. N. b

.f........

If rerortable, mailed to:.....08SS.Tf[.5...

f

....M.r. k.h.. & k.PMt.*.4.o.v........

....M92.L..Mt!b?..k.?..t.o.8.!D.3 M

hu 3 h J, m A. +u+o The above material has been shirred to vou on vour referenced P. O.

number.

We have noted a defect which could rossibiv be's safety hazard.

Will vou riease evaluate this noted condition in accoedance with IOCFR21 Parasrarh 21.21 (a) (1) (ii) and (b) (1).

.'P l eaFe a dv i s e u s o f a c t i o n ta k en.

h 1

d.

r-g l

l

=

i f15 NCR NO.

17 REV QUALITY n-nnnno n

ASSURANCE 16 IIATE ISSUED DIVISION 9_39 ng NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 4 QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION Diesel Generator Building, Engine Control Panels 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REY.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

Norgren P.O. 7220-M-18 Air Filter Bowls NA i

5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Air Filter Bowls located in Engine Control Panels 1C-111, 2C-111, 1C-112, 2C-ll2 t

6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED NA QA-6 revision 0 NA 1

l9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA Eneineerine Technical Suonort 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

j YES X

NO NA l

12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of procedure QA-6, revision 0 states in part:

"When a nonconformance is i

reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible for:... d. Documenting l

nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"

[

. '. (.$1[*7.v a*t u r-A :.4 s, e,,, y" /A $I ' ," ;I. ',"

.y y ]

n

.. w:

13 NONCONFORMANCE A copy of a part 21 notice was received by CPCa from Transamerica Delaval Inc.

[

indicating a potential problem with the air filter in the Engine Control Panel, specifically polycarbonate transparent bowls.

Reference attached part 21 notifi-i cation letter from Transamerica Delaval.

14 NCR ORIGINATED BY tM.

W/ A%:~

MCButterfie DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED X

YES NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM L'EGREGATED YES 1 NO and 2C-112 Eneine Control Panels 1C-111, 2C-111, 1C-112 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVIEW B j /J REPORTABILITY g

, ; fy 2 YES NO

[

~~ '

v DATE: A// 4 6

l 22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD ASSURANpE INE DATE:

QA-6 Rev 0

0-00009 nace 2 of 4 12 6 CAUSE e

\\

l i

I 27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l

IYES l

l NO l

28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION l

l l REWORK l

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

l USE AS IS 1

29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

lYES l

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION l

31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE l

l ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE l

ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN l

33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION 1

l l

l ACCEPTABLE I

l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UN4CCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A.N.I.

(ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rav 0

gg

'15 NCR N0.

17 REV QUALITY 0-00011 0

ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED D8 VISION 2-26-85 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1

0F 7 QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION l

Soil beneath and around Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage Tanks 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

Soil Boring Logs NA B1, B2, B3 & B4 NA I

5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Data recorded in Soil Boring Logs B1, B2, B3 and B4 m.q j '3,C, ;'?" !} u[..)u ~.

[.~

bud b h

• af' n 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED QA-6 revision 0 no NA l9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION

)

i l

NA Engineering Technical Support gli ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

YES NO y

12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 revision 0 states in part:

"When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible fort...d.

Documenting nonconformance on a NCR (Appendix A)"

l 13 NONCONFCRMANCE l

It was determined that soil boring logs B1, B2, B3 and B4 may be invalid because of an j

error that occurred during the submittal of boring data obtained by the subcontractor-Raymond Company. This data was used in the evaluation that determined the potential for soil liquefaction of the sand layer at elevations 600.5' and 603', which is now determined to be inconclusive.

Reference the attached letter of notificatien.

14 NCR ORIGINATED BY N ik $ &

2-2(,- 85 DATE RLBishop NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA l

19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES y

l TTEM SECREGATED YES NO NA r

y 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCRREVIEWBY\\

REPORTABILITY O

YES NO y

DATE:

8-26-85

~

22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE EN E WING 2 YES NO o.4.9.104 QA-6 Rev 0

Q-000ll page 2 of 7 j26 CAUSE i

ke-27' PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l

lTES l

l NO l

28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION l

l l REWORK l

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

l USE AS IS l

l 29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

l YES I

l NO CR NO.

l 30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I

l I*

31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE l

ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED I

32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN f

l l

i j'

33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION l

l ACCEPTABLE l

l UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER A. N. I. (ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0 1

r v

i ORIGINAL i

'15 IJCR NO.

17 REV QUALITY o-onni?

O ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION 9_n_gs NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1 0F 7

QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION Installed *hroughout HVAC systems and in HVAC storage building at the Midland Energy i

Center 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

i Model IBD-21, IBD-23 NA Ruskin Fire Osmpere and NIBD-23 i

5 ITEM DESCRIPTION i

Ruskin Fire Dampers. Model IBD-21 IBD-23, and NIBD-23 (interlocking blade type that i

were supplied with closure springs.)

l 6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N.I. REQUIRED All HVAC systems QA-6 revision 0 no g

l9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION NA Engineering Technical Support 11 ACTIVITT HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

YES y

NO l

12 REQUIREMENT Section 4.2.2 of Procedure QA-6 revision 0 states in part: "When a nonconformance is reported to or detected by QAD personnel, QAD is responsible fors...d.

Documenting l

nonconforniance on a NCR (Appendix A)"

Q QC f I? 5 .h K i D ' 55 (t w u?W,?

I e34 w z ;.4 w 4

. E s--/u a

13 NONCONFORMANCE A copy of a Part 21 Notice was received by Consumers Power Company from Ruskin Manufacturing indicating a potential problem with the fire dampers models referenced ebove.

Specifically, the dampers may not cycle properly under normal system duct pressures.

(Reference the attached notification.)

l 14 NCR ORIGINATED BY

&W 2-2&8$

RLBishop

/

DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES g NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED TES g NO NA-Tagging of these items will occur for I

anu 4Pama t'h a e fm41 t a a P 4 n e /\\

m 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCRREVIEWBY:]

g REPORTABILITY YES NO O

y DATE:

8.-8/,-65 22 DarannimiD TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE "'^ 3 s tuc X-TES NO 0.4.9.105 DATE:7 5

QA-6 Rev 0

^

o-nnn19 n.. 9 nr,

l 26 CAUSE

'(

i l1 i f i

i i

P l

27 FROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED l

lYES l

l NO l

L 28 RECateGNDE DISPOSITION l

l l

l REWORK l

l SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l

lUSE AS IS r

29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDE l

lYES l

l NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION i

I 31 DISTRIBUTION C0tiCURRENCE i

i.

l ACTION ORGANIZATION DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED 32 DISPOSITION ACTION l'AKEN l

I l

t t

I i

I 33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIPICATION NCR CLOSE BY I

l RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION ACCEPTABLE W UNACCEPTABLE QAD DATE ACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEING NCR NUMBER

~

~'

A.N.I. (ASMI)

DATE l

IF REQUIRED 4

e-6 Rev 0 l

I I

_~ _

. _ _. -. -..- _~.

[.

r,.

e-t

?

[

t t

-i h -

i 3

s t

t, c

6 r

t,

),

t, r

i I

L

?

Closed i

i 5

f February 1985 6

i i

. I r

I i

P h

l I

6 t

L t

b P

\\

I t

i-r I

f

(

I i

[

i i

?

P m

Un3Q4dAL 15 NCR NO.

17 REV 0

QUALITY o-00010 ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION

?-to-as NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE 1

0F 2

QAD FORM 1 1 ITEM LOCATION N/A 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

N/A N/A N/A 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Vision examination of all QAD inspection personnel.

6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DOCUMENT 8 ASME A.N. I. REQUIRED 0^~

N/A N/A Inspection Personnel 9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTION ORGANIZATION N/A Quality Assurance Division

. 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

YES X

NO N/A 12 REQUIREMENT Appendix B (Vision Examination Record) of the above referenced document contains a near vision exam which specifies the foilowing acceptance criteria:

" Natural or corrected ability to read J-1 letters on a standard,Jaeger's test chart at a mimimum of 15 inches."

13 NONCONFORMANCE Contrary to the above, from 1/9/85 through 1/31/85 nine inspection personnel had been tested for distance vision using the J-2 letters on a standard Jaeger's test chart. The J-2 criteria is not as stringent as the J-1 letters.

[ A(t.:~j 77f } i s c; u C,'

"s 5 m ' ' 7.p p 4,.q t n.,.

61o U

.4 d

.m g.,, y j 14 NCR ORIGINAT BY h Zv9 eT w

e

/

(

DATE 19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES X N0 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA ITEM SECREGATED YES X NO N/A 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REVIEW BY)

/

REPORTABILITY

/ ff YES X NO O

'"M DATE: A R f5 22 DETERMINED 10 BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD ASSURANCE GINEERING N/A b N/A If DATE:

QA-6 Rev 0

@ cooto I

s Pcga 2 of 2

26 CAUSE The individual responsible for administering the examination mistakenly used the i

wrong letters on the near distance vision exam test chart as acceptance criteria.

27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED I X l YES l

1 NO 28 REcoleGNDED DISPOSITION I

IREWORK l

l SCRAP /RF. JECT l

l REPAIR l

l USE AS IS j

29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

lYES W NO CR NO.

30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None.

7 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE I

ys)c 2-20-65~

Ol S y

LACTION ORGANIZ~ATIO(

DATE QAD CONCURRENCE DATE hiQ NP NNac ENGINEERING DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED l

32 DISPOSITION ACTION TAKEN The individual responsible for administering the vision examination has been re-instructed to use the correct acceptance criteria.

All nine certified inspection personnel have been re-examined for near distance vision using the correct (J-1 letters) acceptance criteria of a standard Jaeger's test chart.

All nine examinees have passed the correct acceptance criteria, resulting in no concern for inspector qualification of past inspections.

33 METHOD OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION NCR CLOSED BY RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION

/> / /

1. /

/

(

hw/&/(ariwYW

@ ACCEPTABLE l_

l UNACCEPTABLE.

v'QAD /

U DATE 4F UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR NUMBER

~

A.N.I.

(ASME)

DATE IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rav 0 l

nr e..a,3 *. ~.

• i f t**

.:. u..

s.

15 NCR NO.

17 REV QUALITY

/l - o o o o 4 O

ASSURANCE 16 DATE ISSUED DIVISION

/.P.:7,c.::r NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 18 PAGE

/

OF g QAD FORM 1 1

ITDi LOCATION LDarabsusa #2 2 DRAWING OR PART NO. AND REV.

3 PART NAME 4 SERIAL NO.

NA

/6rsoss.

NA

_., GF 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION

c. A c'

.c&

Z,ransa Mobi%x - 2 l4 og tiiha.

Sfo d.

No ll-Do5/o9

-Q

\\

6 ITEM STARTUP SYSTEM NO.

7 REFERENCE DO iT

' 8' ASME A.N. I. REQUIRED CPC ^~'

NA

/ P t.3'-H Tc2 s

!vD

^!

9 INSPECTION PLAN REV 10 ACTICN ORGANIZATION Es-oooot o

Matsn~ol Ssnicas 11 ACTIVITY HOLD REQUIRED:

ACTIVITY HOLD ORDER NO.

E N P O R f91.A T m ha c 'a v 12 REQUIREMENT Sfs/ss In aukri a.d.' part h/D I, CPc Spac

'D b P.xv i

.%hs+ifufron.s a rs E, L P 13-412s slaIs.1 in ri "Moleilux -2 14 o 3 tubs.

.5/u.k No

//-o sto9."

13 NONCONFORMANCE Makrkt rscalvad was not as ordarad.

t V4ndix solo.sfitufa.d "Msbila&EPe 14 og fishi

.5fm:.k No ll-o o s 7 7."

}NCR GINATED BY

\\.

0 l-22 -A.S DATE

"~

19 HOLD TAGS APPLIED YES

% NO 20 LOCATION OF HOLD TAGS OR SEGREGATED AREA brdbdSa O

I'/o[Q A/d ITEM SECREGATED g YES NO 21 NEED TO REVIEW FOR 23 TREND CODE 24 NCR REV BY REPORTABILITY YES

1. NO b

E j. i,. -.

'UATE: /,f.7 d df -

t' 22 DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE 25 SECTION HEAD, ASSURANCE ENGINEERING YES NO DATE:

QA-6 Rev 0

Sy S oh 0 0 "OObb 26 CAUSE YMMA

& 4 S 77 r1R-GD /br66 4 f.

~

c09

• b g%l

. c>

7 p#

27 PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION RE l

l YES l 4-l NO 28 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

,I l

l REWORK l

b1 SCRAP / REJECT l

l REPAIR l el USE AS IS

.29 CONDITIONAL RELEASE NEEDED l

lYES l Vl NO CR NO.

' 30 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION fSt.e O N O 3 us E 73 + /D WO 3 %

56&

Mr7~GCHip

/Jerrsk c

SexMt C 5 C.- 1?'l 5 2.

n 31 DISTRIBUTION CONCURRENCE I

I

$ ~ h - VY L-

'E ~l'o-2:6 l

AC OR IZATION DATE

@ RRENCE DATE mi m m a-ga

/JA ENGINTE1QNG DATE A.N.I.

(ASME) IF REQUIRED l

33 DISP 0 ITION ACTION TAKEN Ebc k W:>

l Ma trid placed

m. o Cf c_o sbc.k_.

7do.

I1-co5 7 7 33 METHOD OF DIS OS TION ACTION VERIFICATION CR CLOSED BY 90< C4 m M %

lk Q T

RESULTS OF DISPOSITION ACTION VERIFICATION

,I I VI ACCEPTABLE l

l UNACCEPTABLE QQ DATE

'1 IF UNACCEPTABLE, REFERENCE SUPERSEDING NCR bb

!i NUMBER A.N.I.

(ASME)

DATE l'l, IF REQUIRED QA-6 Rev 0

~ ~

to m aristy, ntoieno r.nsegy cent.er From RLOlivar/ PEP:

u, Mid1ced En2rgy Cantor CONSUMERS

'~

POWER Date January 31, 1985 COMPANY Subject MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER Internal DISPOSITION OF NCR Q-00004 Correspondence File: 0460.3 UFI: 73*10*03 Serial: CSC-8132 CC JLWcod, MEC RLBull, MEC DJVokal, NEC PJGroves, MEC GWRowe, MEC EWGoold, MEC i

The subject NCR was generated during Receipt Inspection of a shipment of a grease product manufactured by Mobil Oil Corporation. The specification required grease designated as Mobilux 2 to be shipped while the actual shipment contained Mobilux EP-2 grease.

Mobilux 2 and Mobilux EP-2 are lithium soap based gresses of the same grade.

EP-2 also contains an additive that makes it suitable for use in " Extreme Pressure" applications.

Based on the industrial products brochure describing the Mobilux 2 and the Mobilux EP-2 lubricants and discussions with Mobil Oil personnel, we have concluded that in all cases where Mobilux 2 grease is i

specified, Mobilux EP-2 may be substituted.

If you have any questions, please contact us.

r i

..e>

~; 4 s

M m

p I

(

[

i l

l 4,,"

t 3

f f4 5 e

c

, x,e e y d

5

,ys f

y-y ;a f f, >$.*yl I L, ' *J t

l l

l IC0185'-0001D-CN04 l

)

i r

P e

'e

{g,.,

g]

Q-00012 page 3 of 7 i :.. - -

, "" W l Box 129 i 3 Ex, oranoview, uissouri e403o s

. Phone 616 7617476 L

h DMason of Phines Industrie' TELEX 42 4192 G MA

~

Factories: Parsons and Great Bend Kansas; Anaheim, California; Minden, Loulstena; and Bronx, New York i

Representatives in sliMajor Cities November 6, 1984 l

Director, Office of In'spection and Enforcement

$ E d " - U,L " "4,

',4 n m F7"6 E 9". ".

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.s

~

Washington, D. C.

10555 Sir:

In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 21. Ruskin Manufacturing l

l Company, located at 3900 Dr. Greaves Road, Grandview, Missouri 64030, is herewith reporting that we have discovered a deficiency with equipment furnished by Ruskin Manufacturing Company for Nuclear Power Plant application.

On August 7,1984 Ruskin received a letter from The Waldinger Corporation addressing seven (7) fire dampers failure to close under normal duct pressure at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.

On August 13, 1984 Ruskin visited the jobsite to inspect dampers. The results of the insoection revealed damper condition to exhibit bent blades, bent blade tracks, rust and zine rich paint on springs.

On August 20, 1984 after Engineering review of inspection results, Ruskin again visited the jobsite for Engineering review of above referenced damper conditions.

As a result of this review Ruskin recommended that the blade packages be replaced i

iti the effected fire dampers.

On October 30, 1984, Ruskin was notified, by The Waldinger Corporation, that the new blade packages had been installed and tested. The fire dampers with the newly installed blade packages would still not cycle under normal duct pressure.

Ruskin Engineering immediately began lo evaluate the problem to determine the cause of the daipers failure to close under air flow.

Results of this evaluation.

indicated the test methods originally utilized to test dampers under flow may not accurately depict actual installed conditions.

Ruskin fire dampers were tested in accordance with AMCA 500, test figure 5.5, counted on the face of the test tunnel.

Actual installed condition, in ductwork, may not result in proper performance as tested to AMCA.

Ruskin, on November 2, I

and 51984, performed air flow tests in accordance with AMCA 500 with damper mounted on face of tunnel as well as with damper mounted in ductwork.

The results of this test indicated that face mounted damper would close at much higher static pressure than the damper which was installed in'ductwork.

,, r i d[N yGs t LOUVERS BACKDRAFT DAMPERS FIRE DAMPERS CONTROL DAMPERS t atC0 0'v$0N. Lau cevtS80N. WAL1a DevtteON. W ANUF ACTURED t*OU5iNG'atCRE Af eOhat vtMecit Gnoup. Ystug eeveting. nietsew rwvitenw

~

_~

Q-00012 pags 4 of 7 j

t November 6, 1984 U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission t

Page 2 i

I since no facility exists to properly test dampers under flow that would simulate all field installed conditions, and relationship between face mounted damper and damper installed in ductwork cannot be accurately calculated, Ruskin recommends

[

that fire dampers supplied with closure springs, which require closure 'under air flow conditions, be tested to verify proper operation. This condition affects only interlocking blade fire dampers Model IBD-21,1B0-23 and NIBD-23 supplied with closure springs by Ruskin.

l Ruskin is currently researching methods to modify fire dampers to ensure closure i

under air flow.

y Attachment I to this letter identifies the affected jobsites by location and the l

number of units sug-plied to each.

In closing, please find enclosed a copy of the letter describing the situation,

i contained in this '4etter, which will be sent to each affected site.

If further questions should arise, please cont'act us at once.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely.

l RUSKIN UFACTURING DI 15 Thomas D'.

Hill President j

Enclosures:

Attachment I Notification Form Letter NOTE:

For further discussions, questions, or concerns on this matter, please f

contact:

Richard J. Yarges Ruskin Manufacturing Division (816) 761-7476 i

l l

b j

i i

Q-00012 psgs 5 of 7 Attachment I Page 1 of 3 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Maine Yankee Atomic Power Tennessee Valley Authority.

Maine Yankee 400 West Summit Hill. Drive R.R. 2 Box 3270 Knoxville, Tennessee 27902 Wiscusset, Maine 04578 11 Units 20 Units Sequoyah Nuclear Plant.

Diablo Canyon Tennessee Valley Autboirty Pacific Gas and Electric See Above 77 Beal St.

64 Units San Francisco, California 94106 19 Units Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Hope Creek Tennessee Valley Authority BechtelConstructionpInc.

See Above P.O. Box 3965 m f' n.

344 Units San Francisco',5 California 94119 p93fnfts3" Bellefonte Nuclear Plant

. d Ib clinton Tennessee Valley Authority a$dh9 Zack Company See Above y-4600 W. 12th Place i

144 Units Chicago, Illinois 60650 l

262 Units Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Midland Tennessee Valley Authority Zack Company See'Above See Above 204 Units 366 Units Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station LaSalle The W41dinger Corporation Zack Company i

P.O. Box 215 See Above Buckeye, Arizona 85326 106 Units 963 Units Turkey Point Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Florida Power and Light Waldinger-Young & Bertke P.O. Box 3088 2601 Bell Avenue i

Florida City, Florida 33034 Des Moines, Iowa 50321 2 Units 5 Units W.P.P.S.S. Unit 1 Waterford #3 Bechtel Power Corporation Louisiana Power and Light i

P.O. Box 650 142 Delaronde St.

L Richland, Washington 99352 New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 l

j 303 Units 26 Units l

l l

i l

l.

i

_,e__~~__.,.

Q-00012 pegs 6 of 7 Attachment i Page 2 of 3 i

Quad Cities D. C. Cook l

Zack Company American Electric Power Service Corp.

I 4600 W. 12th Place P.O. Box 16631 i

Chicago, Illinois 60650 Columbus, Ohio 43216 19 Units 22 Units Morrison Construction Catawba Nuclear i

I P.O. Box 1130 Bahnson Service Hammond, Indiana 46320 P.O. Box 384

- 4 Units Clover, South Carolina 29710 i

421 Units l

Perry Nuclear Millstone Robert Irsay Stone and Webster l

P.O. Box 205 P.O. Box 345 i

Perry, Ohio 44081 Waterford, CT.

06385 i

520 Units 17 Units i

Susquehanna Duane Arnold j

Peabody and Wind Eng. CO.

Iowa Electric Light and Power 275 Geiger P.O. Box 351 Philadelphia, PA.

19115 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406 1

95 Units 22 Units j

t Arkansas Nuclear One Byron Nuclear j

Arkansas Power and Light American Warming & Ventilating i

t P.O. Box 551 1310 Indian Wood Circle l

Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Maumee, Ohio 43537 144 Units 51 Units Monticello Braidwood Nuclear AZCO Inc.

American Warming & Ventilating c/o Northern States Power See Above P.O. Box 655 51 Units Monticello, Minnesota 55362 30 Units Comanche Peak Farley Nuclear Texas Utilities Alabama Power P.O. Box 1002 P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Glen Rose, Texas 379 Units 72 Units South Texa's Project Callaway Intermech, Inc.

Bechtel Power P.O. Box 2279 15740 Shady Grove Rd.

Bay City, Texas 77414 Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-1454 153 Units 375 Units Indian Point #3 Wolf Creek Power Authority of the State of New York Bechtel Power,

P.O. Box 215 See Above Buchanan, New York 10511 355 Units 2 Units l

L

~~

Q,00012 pass 7 of 7

~

Attachment I' Page 3 of 3

' Davis Besse W.P.P.S.S. #2 Toledo Edison W.P.P.S.S.

300 Madison Avenue P.O. Box 968 Toledo, Ohio 43652 Richland, Washington 99352 2 Units 14 Units l

Zion E. I. Hatch f

Commonwealth Edison Bechtel Power P.O. Box 767 15740 Shady Grove Rd.

Chicago, Illinois 60690 Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-1454 6 Units 1 Unit C

Oconee River Bend j

Mill Power Supply Stone and Webster i

P.O. Box 32307 P.O. Box 5200 Charlotte, North Carolina 28232 Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034 2 Units 98 Units Oconee McGuire 1

.Bahnson Service Bahnson Service Company P.O. Box 159 P.O. Box 57 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Corneliur., North Carolina 28031,

i 26 Units 11 Units l

,.,3 r.B Ij

ps; w -

y _?

_z t

r; S..

i l u ' ~'/. '

t i

l I

F i

Transamenca

"*""Z7%';*i.?o.....n o

,3au y t. c.

Delaval

""4W" o-oooo9 o

Oektnd. Cahfornb 94621 HIS) 577 7400 156889 1.5.6890 January 22, 1965 Director, Office of Inspecticrs & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory canniasion Washington, D.C.

20555

c. z - -.

, - - e.y

. h, p.,,,,, n):.. L. V.. &

1 Wh ' 2 3

Dear Sir:

In accordance with the requirements of Title 10,' Chapter 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, Transmarica Delaval, Inc., here-by notifies the canniasion of a potential defect in a companant of a DSR or DSRV Standby Diesel Generator. 1here could exist a tial problan with the Air Filter in the hine Ccritrol Panel.poten-At Cleveland Electric Perry Nuclear Station, it was recently dis-covered that the Air Filter for the Engine Control Panel had a polycarbonate transparent bowl. On November 5,1978 the Filter purchase specification taas changed from the polycarbonate trans-parent towl to a metal bowl. The polycarbonate bowl is ficiFrated 150 psig at 125'F and the metal bowl is rated 250 ps at! 175'F.

Een the specification was originally issued, the V rated the posycarbonate bowl at 250 psi. The air pressure idtich the Filter will see in operation cycles between 200 and 250 at room tenparature.

New metal bowl Filters have been sent to Cleveland Electric to re-place the polycarbonate bowls.

We will send copies of this letter to all sites tdiere we furn4=h=A the Engine Control Panel with a s4=414=* Filter so that the sites can verify that the Filter has a metal bowl.

Tranamnwrica Delaval has supplied the DSR and DSRV Engine with Engine Control Panels to the following sites:

Utility Site Serial No.

Model Middle South Energy Grandgulf 74033/36 DSRV 16 Gulf States Utilities River Bend 74039/40 DSR 48

. Carolina Power & Light Shearon Harris 74046/49 DSRV 16 Duka Power Ccapany Catawba 75017/20 DSRV 16 Southern California Edison San Onofre '- -

75041/42' DSRV 20 Cleveland Electric Illtan.

Perry 75051/54 DSRV 16 i

TVA Bellefonte 75080/83 DSRV 16 Washington Public Power WPPSS 1 75084/85 DSRV 16 Washington Public Power WPPSS 4 76031/32 DSRV 16 Texas Utilities Services Comanche Peak 76001/04 DSRV 16 Georgia Power Vogtle 76021/24 DSRV 16 L

Consumers Power Midland 77001/04 DSRV 12 i

TVA Hartsville/Phipps Bend 77024/35 DSRV 16 SMUD Rancho Seco 81015/16 DSR 48 y,nofro!%v [f i

rv-

gggg pfge 4 of 4 Q-00009 iS6889 156890 Page 2 January 22, 1985 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory C * =sion 1he Filter is marufactured by the C. A. Nororen Co. of Littleten, Colorado.

Tranammerier laval.The Filter is installad in the Engine Control Panel by Our raccrmr ion to eliminate the potential rol Panel and to replace the po yearbonate Filterlen is to inspect the Engine w i

bowl with a metal bowl, if the Filter does not have a metal bowl.

A visual inspection can easily determine if the Filter bowl is transparent polycarbonate.

All parts required to replace the bowl will be furnished as re-quired, en request, and in accordance with each individual contract.

i Since action is required by others, we cannot estimate dun the corrective action will be empleted.

i Our evaluation on this potential problan was empleted on January 21, 1985.

t Very truly yours, i

i gt&

h v.-

R. E. Bo i

Manager,yerQuality Assurance DIN L

t

Q-00011 page 3 of 7

@ Consumers Power James W Cook Vice Presidens - Projects, Engine &ng and Construction General omses: 1945 West Pernell Reed, Jocknen. MI 49201 * (517) 78s 0453 December 21, 1984 84-17 #1 Mr J G Keppler, Regional Administrator US Nuclear Regulatory Commission "1 M'3,E O' S_'_,

~,'

'A*J #

'~

l Region III

~

l 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 l

MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT DOCKET NOS 50-329 AND 50-330 DIESEL FUEL OIL TANK SOILS BORINGS FILE: 0.4.9.104 SERIAL:

32097

References:

1) Letter, R J Erhardt to H R Denton, Serial 32090, dated l

November 21, 1984

2) Letter, J E Brunner to ASLB Members, dated December 6, 1984 l

3) Letter, J A Mooney to H R Denton, Serial 16881, dated May 3, 1982 On November 21, 1984, Consumers Power Company (CP Co) notified your staff of a reportable condition concerning records of soils Borings B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4.

References 1 and 2 provided additional information on this subject.

Pending resolution of our request to waive the requirement to submit a written 30-day 50.55(e) report during the project shutdown, we have prepared this interim report on the above subject.

I Description of Concern It has been determined that the data for Borings B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4 submitted to the NRC by references 3 and 4, presented in the Midland FSAR and in the response to 50.54(f) questions, do not represent the actual borings l

which were taken at the diesel generator fuel oil tank location.

Reference 2 is attached to provide a description of the situation and the concern raised as to the potential effect on analysis of liquefaction potential of the soils beneath the diesel fuel oil tanks.

Safety Impact l

The se,le technical issue potentially affected by the invalidity of the previously submitted boring logs B-1 through B-4 relates to the potential G 4 yo I /B NOL >3 I

I g,. tp.- r -

OC1284-050$A-MP02

.9 Q-000ll page 4 of 7 2

Serial 32097 84-17 #1 liquefaction of the sand layer between elevations 600.5' and 603' indicated in boring DF-5.

It is our conclusion based on a conservative assessment of available information that the analysis of the liquefaction potential of the soils beneath the diesel fuel oil tanks is inconclusive.

Root Cause It appears that a combination of events occurred which allowed the use.of incorrect boring logs.

1.

In June and July of 1977 respectively, the same company (Raymond) made the actual diesel fuel oil tank borings and the borings which were erroneously submitted. The borings which were mistakenly submitted related to an AT&T Project in Midland County that had no relationship to Bechtel or Consumers Power Company. The actual B-1 through B-4 borings at the Midland jobsite were taken to obtain soil samples at the proposed location of the diesel fuel oil tanks.

I 2.

Both boring series were labeled B-1 through B-4 and the soil types, boring depths and taking of Shelby tube samples for the AT&T borings were, in general, similar to other borings taken at the Midland site. The AT&T i

borings listed the job address as Midland, Michigan.

3.

During the Site-wide soils investigation in the spring of 1979, it was determined that boring data was required in the area of the diesel generator fuel oil tanks. Bechtel personnel then recalled that borings i

had been made there in the summer of 1977. The Bechtel Geotechnical l

Engineering Group (Geotech), which was not involved in the 1977 borings, asked Project Engineering to provide the boring logs. Project Engineering believed that no drilling logs had been made for the B-1 through B-4 l

borings at the Midland Site. However, their response to Geotech apparently l

did not clearly convey this but rather it was understood by Geotech that l

Project Engineering didn't have any logs and not that they didn't exist.

l Bechtel speculates that the handwritten drilling logs taken for the AT&T project may have been supplied by the drilling contractor (Raymond) in response to a request by Geotech for logs of the B-1 through B-4 borings taken at the Midland jobsite.

(

4.

In March of 1982 the handwritten B-1 through B-4 drilling logs again surfaced in conjunction with the design of the site dewatering system.

The recent Bechtel investigation indicates that one Bechtel employee believed that the handwritten driller's logs did not record borings taken l

in the area of the diesel fuel oil storage tanks and that there may have been discussions within Bechtel's Geotech group on this matter. Apparently a decision was made based on the available data to include these driller's l

logs as input to the liquefaction analysis for the buried diesel fuel oil tanks. Subsequently, Consumers Power submitted the handwritten driller's l

logs to NRC informally and then via reference 3.

5.

Bechtel prepared typewritten boring logs from the handwritten driller's logs for inclusion in the June 1982 FSAR submittal. This limited further j

opportunity to detect from the original driller's logs that they were incorrect l

l nt t m L _n to s a. wpm

Q-00011 page 5 of 7 3

Serial 32097 84-17 #1 as to the Midland site location since the original driller's logs were now back in the files. The typed boring log profiles include additional information which is believed to have been obtained from the test records of the borings actually taken at the Midland jobsite, such as the boring coordinates.

It is normal practice for a handwr'itten boring log to be produced at the time a boring is made. These logs are produced by the technical person overseeing the drilling operation. Information concerning boring locations is entered in the logs by such technical personnel, and thus can be directly traced to the Midland jobsite.

In the case of Borings B-1 through B-4, the erroneous logs (ie, the logs of the AT&T borings) contained no location coordinates or other information directly indicating the location of the borings. Instead, the location information obtained from testing data concerning the onsite B-1 through B-4 borings was assumed to be applicable to the logs of the offsite borings. As previously stated, this confusion resulted in logs of the incorrect borings being submitted to the NRC.

The absence of location information on the drilling logs traceable to the Midland site is a circunstance unique to Borings B-1 through B-4.

A review of all Bechtel borings incuded in Section D.1.4 of the Soils 50.54(f) response indicates that borings B-1 through B-4 are the only borings cade from a driller's log. All the other borings were produced from handwritten boring logs by a Bechtel Geotechnical Engineer assigned to the t

drilling. The nomal practice of involvement by Geotech personnel would l

preclude any generic repetition of the unique circumstances of this l

particular situation.

l

\\,; n - s

<.QT h.

l Corrective Action

~

g

, 1. < D e u*"

1 The controls in place at the time of the Project shutdown were adequate to prevent a recurrence of this problem, thus no process corrective action is necessary.

Part corrective action required includes correcting the affected documentation l

and determining if additional analysis or additional field information is l

necessary to address the issue of potential liquefaction of soils below the diesel fuel oil tanks.

Because of the Project shutdown, these corrective actions will not be pursued and no further reports on this subject will be made unless the Midland Energy Center is reactivated. This item will be entered in our Correspondence and Commitment Management System for long-term tracking.

4 JWC/JLW/ksa CC: Document Control Desk, NRC EAdensam, NRC Office of NRR Washington, DC Bethesda, MD INPO Records Center OC1284-0505A-MP02

Q-00011 page 6 of 7 4

Serial 32097 84-17 #1 OM/0L SERVICE LIST Mr Frank J Kelley Atomic Safety & Licensing Attorney General of the Appeal Board State of Michigan U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hs Carole Steinberg Washington, DC 20555 Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Mr C R Stephens (3) 720 Law Bui'...ng Chief, Docketing & Services Lansing, MI 48913 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary Washington, DC 20555 Mr Myron M Cherry, Esq Suite 3700 Ms Mary Sinclair Three First National Plaza 5711 Summerset Street Chicago, IL 60602 Midland, MI 48640 Mr Wendell H Marshall Mr William D Paton, Esq RFD 10 Counsel for the NRC Staff Midland, MI 48640 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr Charles Bechhoefer, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission East-West Towers, Room E-413 Washington, DC 20555 Bethesda, MD 20014 Ms Barbara Stamaris Dr Frederick P Cowan 5795 North River Road 6152 N Verde Trail Rt 3 Apt B-125 Freeland, MI 48623 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Dr Jerry Harbour Mr Fred C Williams Atomic Safety & Licensing Isham, Lincoln & Beale Board Panel 1120 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 840 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20036 East-West Towers, Room E-454 Bethesda, MD 20014 Mr James E Brunner, Esq Consumers Power Company Mr M I Miller, Esq 212 West Michigan Avenue Isham, Lincoln & Beale Jackson, MI 49201 Three First National Plaza 52nd Floor Chicago, IL 60602 n-,*er nenca.unne

Q-00011 page 7 of 7 5

Serial 32097 84-17 #1 Mr Steve Cadler, Esq Mr John Demeester, Esq 2120 Carter Avenue Dew Chemical Building St Paul, MN 55108 Michigan Division Midland MI 48640 Mr P Robert Brown Clark, Klein & Beaumont Ms Lynne Bernabei 1600 First Federal Bldg Covernment Accountability Project Woodward Ave 1901 Q Street, NW Detroit, MI 48226 Washington, DC 20009 7

Ff* P '.d

""" '7 T '

r- < s ' n 's.'

r>

,Y $:

's-;

1**

~,

x.

l l

l 1

OCl284-0505A-MP02

_ _ -.