ML20099H992
| ML20099H992 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/13/1984 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20099H984 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-55029, TAC-55030, NUDOCS 8411280415 | |
| Download: ML20099H992 (2) | |
Text
_.
/
UNITED STATES j
y p,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION 1-
- 5 E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 s
l
/
jj
' SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION 1
f.
. RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 53 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-2 AND AMENDMENT NO. 44 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-8
'~
4:
n
~
j ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
~
l JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT-NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-348 AND 50-364 Introduction o
a Alabama Power Company (APCo), the licensee of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear j
Plant Units 1 and 2, proposed changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) of Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8 in a letter written to the j
Comission dated May 14, 1984. This amendment request consists of aaministrative changes to TSs 6.1.2, Figure 6.2-1, 6.2.3.4, 6.5.1.8, 6.5.2.2., 615:-3.1.d,~6.6.1 and 6.7.1.b and d, for both units. Our discussion and evaluation follows.
~
Discussion and Evaluation The TS changes as proposed would reflect the current corporate organizational change of placing the Vice President Nuclear Generation in a o
F Senior Vice President position. This action would increase senior APCo management involvement in nuclear operations. The portions of the TSs j
involved are included in Section 6, Administrative Controls, as listed above.
Sumary 1
!i We conclude that the proposed changes are administrative in nature, update the TS for Units 1 and 2 to agree with the current corporate organizational structure and are acceptable.
Environmental Consideration 3
!~
This amendment involves a change in the administrative procedure and requirements. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibilit for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Section 51.22(c)(y criteria
- l.
10).
Pursuant p
to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental 9
assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
- 1
${
Yii Okoo$fe
(
- i. '.
._.-_... _ [. _._
~
N
~
2-Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1)' there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the.
- public will not ~be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the A_
Connission's regulations and the ~ issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and 4
safety of the public.
Dated: November 13, 1984 Principal Contributor:
G. Pick (Region II) 1 1
e ~~. -
e l
j 1
9 4 1 4
5 i
4 j
[
i t
e og.
~w e.
q-w. -- -.
c
_ _. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _