ML20099H125
| ML20099H125 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1984 |
| From: | Boyer V PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| OL-A-103, NUDOCS 8411280033 | |
| Download: ML20099H125 (3) | |
Text
$^-
,. ;.2 I@ j
- gy h, lOS -
4 Y
Qq,. G
,, ~
Q cC s
n
.L e', $3 7
U,e t, #%
.e s
x q%,Q ~,\\k)
=
e
)/,g. T{
n., g
.. to e as m 1
u i:, f
~
- .. 3:7ce Grier, Diro c:o r Unt:ed 5:s:es l'ucles: 7.e s ula:e rv Ccarission office of Inspe::1on and Inforcemen:, Region I 631 is h Avenue Kin of ?:us412
?A 19106
.Subjec::
US!i?.C II; I La::a: dated January 31, 1979
?.E: S1:e Inspection of Decenbe: 26-29, 1973 and Janunty 2, 1979 Inspection 7.epor: tio. 50-352/73-12 & 50-352/78-03 Lincrick Centrating Sta:1on - tinits 1& 2 File: qCAL 1-2-2 (352/75-12 and 353/75-06)
Oca: !!;., C ri s :
In respt'nse to the subject le::a: rega rdin;: an 1:en identified in,spac:1on of construe:1 n ac:1ti:1es au:horised gjm{.duria;thecutjcc:
t')
f:ll: vin :
by ::..C License :*os. CT7?.-100 and -1C7, va ::ansni: herevi:h the A::acd=en: I - Re s p o r.s e :o Ap p end t:: A Should you ha se any ques:%ss concerning this 1:en, va L4ould be pleased to discuss than with you.
el'
/.. tv,1\\,*
.t k i
g.}p */ [t.ifU Sinceraly, i
kN'5
- 1../ j Qm V.
S. 3cya
]
. !*,J *. / g A::achasu:
bee R. H. Elins, 3ech: 1
- 2. R.
Klossir., 3ach: 41 J. 3. Kaspar I. J. 3:sdiay G. Whi:a
!. C.
Kistne H. R. k*s t : a r s / *.e c a l T il a ()
J.'J.
Clarev
~
l.
)-
K.A. !! a l ! c d
(
v i W. 11. Car:oran Projec: Tila (2)
.. T.
hah [oh[h N
O P
4 s
g
,u.-
s.
4.,,. '..;.
(#..
n.. c.. s.. _.i.n,.. _
a u
n.;-
a
.L. ).
- i. :. :. w.. 5 =_. o
- n.,. r... v....
.s m
. (~ -
!:e= ef ':ene: elian:a 10'CF?. 50, A;pendia 3 Criterien 7, s:a:es, in part, tha::
A::ivi:ies affecting quali:y shall be prescribed by docunented-
~,
' ins::uctions, p roc edures,.o drawings and shall be a::c=plished-in accordance vi:h these instrue: ions. precedures, or drawings."
The L1= trick ? SAP., A;;endix D, Quality-Assurance ?:ogra=, Para-graph D.6.4, s:a:es, in part, tha::
"(Zachtel) quali:y con::el engineers... are. responsible fc _ preparing.inspec:1on plans in accordance.vi:h the Field Inspec: ion Manual, (and),Perforcing Quality con::cl Insp,eccions."
Each:e1 ?:oj ect Special ? rov'isions
? ocedure G-6.1 s:ates in See:1on 3.1.5 :ha: "an inspeccion ?cin:
(I)Lin :he Quality Control Ins::ue: ion (QCI) is a =andatory inspection point beyond which vork shall no proceed past the poin: where the designated ac:1vi y is no longer inspec:able".
Con::ary :o the above, on Dece=ber'2, 1978, the velding of a two
~
inch nippl'a onto pipe spool. piece FSK-I33-129-3/9 had proceeded
-beyond the point where so=a of the designa:ed =andatory inspec:icns could not be perfor=ed.
I Re'sooese to-Ita= cf Nonec=cliance The required inspe c tions have. b e er. -p erf or=e d and do cunen:ed.
A review of c:her open inspec:ica plans indica:es that no c:her Quality C.on::al hold points'have been bypassed.
In any,even:, if hold points areL=1ssed they : e iden:ified prior to the s:ar: of final'inspecticas as a =atter of routine, since in-process inspections are reviewed for co=pleteness prio:
=c the star: of final ~1nspections.
In order to avoid fur:her 1:e=s of.ncacem-pliance, the Field S:aff Engineering and Area Supervision vere re-ins::ue:ed a: a =ee:ing on January 2, 1979, on : heir cuali:y related re,spensibili:tes concerning-hold poin:s.
4 Discussion be-re:lassified
- :is reques:ed tha: :his item of noncompliance
.as-an unresolved i:e= since the Quali:y Con::cl Ins: rue:1casien iden:ify missed inspec: ions
,the Limerick projec: are designed :o idep. ify-or hold pBints.
We do'no: consider 1: appropria:e :o this as an 1.:e= of nonco=pliance since-reviews of the in-process inspec:icas and final inspec:1ons v'hich follow veuld h:ve iden:ified the condition.
t I-1/1 y
50-352/73 (
o 50-353/7S-0S
' '-i '. k
-w
.L i
....... - ~ -
,_.a._.,
,,---,,,n.
,,--,..n-,~,,
-,.