ML20099G815

Applicant Exhibit A-92,consisting of Responding to Notice of Violation in NRC Re Insp Rept 50-352/77-02 from Insp on 770308-11

ML20099G815
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	05/07/1984
From:	Boyer V PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
OL-A-092, OL-A-92, NUDOCS 8411270446
Download: ML20099G815 (7)

Text

n

. f.._..f -_.

l.

@L. EU qq

.gF[L C~

f-e kEF:&

%jc I

n s v-

s ty eb a<

p g ",

p

.e s

s i

m 4

i

&n # 9h.

J 4

>en, i r(h D

• g ([8

-.J)!

)*7 13r.19'ti i.f..tg ('4*lh'f..

.s.

s.,.

.r

\\

lb. J 4.sta s P. O!,P.t. illy. 1 f recre r s,.

[f.?

Unit ctd S t a t'ec nucleret ):cquistory Occ:sission Office et )ncpection tend inforc u ent, 1:e ;'i o n I.-

.i,.'

C 631 Tarh' Avenue

. '5' k*ing of 1russis, Pn.

19406

r.,

v 197/

..yR,..

Dubjecri Uf" rip C 11 : T Lt:t t.c t'ai ed byril 7 2 i

'h 9 la.:

!:$ t c-I n p+.c. t i on of 1(r:r ch 0- 11, 19 7 7 Insparet 2 on.1:e. cort Ho. 5 0

.*t T,7./ 7 7 - 0 2 TO'.

,..[M Li::( ri r.h Gen er c ti:p'. G r o tio n 1:ni t 1 g

N )*ile QliAL I-2-2.-) (77-D')

.;j.-

4

'.*q.'4

,C

~

r;g>

. -)

\\

.r -

\\

a., n=. o'aeinyi

(

. m

(

s

2 1.?e o f f e r th se f oll tmint; - r e sp on u c a to the cubject 2.e : t e:-

i..

regarding it er.s :0 dent.if ied <!stric k t h e 11hc *.*idi t t o 't,is e r ick.. '" I "

':Ej Generating fication - I?ud t J eh'Mr,rch 6 11, 1977 for ~

h.:

inspection of' corint r o(.t.t c,n tactivi ticts (.uthorized by lir.C License

, ;gi

!!o, CPPR-107.

d.i s,

).

. /.t tra chcien t 3-ut nienn een t.o 7tc.sr. A of Appendi=~A

., J.

%,f r31 c u bj t.c t )ntgar.

g.,

/. t t a chtit:n t 11 i us;pounc-t.o X.tti: D' t.1 Ap p'<sud1= A b"

% of c. v 1. 'u c t lutic r.

s A t t t: c hir. <::i t.

u T.

. v t npon n e t o 7 : w. e o f. Api. en dix A e

of ta vl,j e c t. )uttar.

c.':

4hou24 you ht.vc any querriona c o n n 6 r n i u r., chase irans, we

.qi..:

,vou.14 he p)eenied t.o diaeuss ther, with you.

1 Sanctersly.

4 1/sy

• n'

'h,,' p6-y-

.)

V

/.

s

4. t',r..Ge;,g.,

.g f.4

" ig-n G

} c.-4r.c::hnents 8411270446 040507

.t 4

b ', y.

PDRADOCK05000g

}'

2:clera o

.C o); y tv:

V.S. Loy :

y' g,,

j, y r. d 1,..,

. ['

• A. Mu.[: a r.d U'

.f' g'.

J.

F.u= par

r..

,s -

Wi i ^8h /I'~C"l'. File, N'

3' 7

0,. U b ', '.. t A+

7(1*""

)

t

.o.

: 1..,. "

.~

~

• I f

t',.

AT~1"91-7 I c e.

Ranonse to io==di c i - Hetice of Vicistien I: fraction:

7

~

1.

Criterion V of Appendix -B of 10 CF?. $O states. -in part,. that:

" Activities affecti=g quality shall be prescribed by docume=tsd -

i:st=:tiosa, pro:s42 ras, or drawings, of a t7pe appropriate to the ciren= stances n=d chall b4 accomplished in accordance with thess insts:tions, proemiures, or drawings." Tae Licarick

?*1R Appendix D.1 and D.4, including A:swar to Question #17, describes the application of this criterion and others to site subcontractora and vendors.

Eachtel drawing C-236, P.47. 6, establinhas 3/16-inch as fillet weld size for volding carben steel stiffeners to stainless steel liner plate of the spent fuel pool ntncture. Snbcontractor procedure CTT-01, Eev. O, establishes vi:nal inap-action requirements.for such weP%g,

" Fillet valda shall be of the specified si:s with full-hat and legs of unifor= size."

O Contrary to the shove, on Mard 11,*1977, f'" et velds at Q

several locations on the 'lizer plate wars -less than the s;ecified' 3/16-ind si:s and hai less than full throat. The welding aM subsequent quality inspection hai nct bees rc= mplished in accor6 arcs with applicable drawings a d pro:ecurs.s. 7:e msasures established to control special processes, a:d the program for 4.s;4ction of linar/stiffe:sr welding, Mich wara estahlished to co: ply with Criteria II aind I of Appendiz. 3 of 10 CFP. 50, vers not effectively i=plemented.

F.4 s.m:e I

A non-co'ufor-= ce report issued to pr: ride egr; active action for the -

condition identified above has resulted in Y:e fo2.lowi.gr 1 ~. Correcti e Stam.

j i

All co:pleted weles have.een rains;/:ted at the site to assure that their si:o is in accordanes with drawing require =sats.

1:7 u:isrsicsd usIds have bess repaired s.:A reinspected.

2.

A-ties to trave.t reeu-m s.

u Tha vendor Plant and Field Su;4rists: dents hav, bass r.einstru:tse.

]

to asnues that velds uset drawing require =4:ts.

"hs Pisst and Site C_

Q.i. Depart: ants have b4en rainstructed in the drsair_g rsquire=esu cr.d vill verify coup 1hnco with t:s requirs:s:tr dcrl:g us vie.'-J.,

i:spectio: of the wolds.

.~.

110

.L Y.e3 Y 77-02

.1 '.

4.f-,,.

m

\\

t

.. s*.

~

' ca,ec:.te :. acop I.upcetor assig:sd t.s the ti=ari::h-work at ths vesds 's pla.st u well as other stop ics;e tors with sidiar usi_c=ects, ware re=i=ded of their su:-rei.11s ce reccire.-e:ts

. with rega.-d to wold si:ss 1:d a,cb.:k un :ade to u'sure shop inspectora h.a.*e veld fillet gau;;es, if their usig.=a:2t requires sues.

~ ~~

- = ~

4 9

e t

9 6

0 1

e 4

e ae-

=..

e 4

k 9,

S E

3 i

e b

e e

t g

e e

.5

~

eed G

~

m-a =- - -. < ~

e-,.e-

.,._r,.

y,y

_7 y,., -

~

.. o.-

.a -.*v*

i j,

1 v m 1 L v

.(

r*10."Ei! II Ees o-oe to A tmti: A - Sties of Vidatior.

2:!ractica.

~

3.-

Critarien XIII of Asps: dix. 3,cf'10 CFF. 50 states, in part, that: " Measures shall be'e,),tablished to control the handling

.... and preservation of r.storial and equipment in secorda==e

}

with work and ir.apection instructions to prevent damage or deterioratics." The Li=arick PSAR, pr.rsgraph D.h.9, states, is part, that:

"Ve:dars shall have writtaa i=.structics to g=vsr=

the ha-M 42... sr.d preservatics of the ite=s under contract ao as to prevent degradation of quality...." The Bechtel Technical Specification 6031-0 L5 for the Spent Fuel Pool I.isar requiras, in paragrapha -7, 9,14 and 16, that:

" Tbs applicatics of haat to.... aastonitic stainless otsol is not per=ittai

~

.... (and) Iron contacitation of stainless steel shall be prevented.... Handling.... proceduras shall includs measures to protset liner: arfaces.... froc da= age."

Contrary to the at-sve, on March 8,1977, the following co=ditic=s existed during field erection of the Spent Fuel Pool Li=ars - (1)

Stainless steel exterior surfacas had been cont =-bated with the

(('C.:

slasjironresiduefro: a ther-a metal cutting process. Several 7 aream exhibited large accuddhsticus of fired slagiron depcsits which indicate that the base nstal was subjected to u=centrolled elevated ta:peratures and iron cont = l atics. This cc=ditice had not been prevented by control =sasras.

(2) Stainlesa steel interier surfacss had been contasir.ated by an u: identified residue

' whic!}, had apparently been deposited in the presence of high heat which had burned a sheeting material in contact with the stul at aoveral locations and of neveral square feet aras-1cis co~"tice had not been prevented by contro'c maasuras.

~

t

. Reseemse.

Nonconfor=ance reports have been issued to provide corrective action for the conditions idsntified above which has resultad in the fc11owing:

(1)

Corrective _ Steer.

The Vendor has subeitted SDD2-fLD-3 requesting acceptance of arass of conta:ination within the Isak chases which was cceepted. Tca em:creto side of the liner plats, except within tha leak chase, will be cleaned in nucordance vi.h Vendors Clesning Procedura CP-1 i

l to net tho clea=11 ness of Article l e, per Addition N. 9 to apccification 5031 ", k5 Revisios 4

.~

II-1/2 4

-,,,-.-~--mw,-,-,-.w-w-w..,.,,,

,,w,,,,,

,3,.--.,,,ww.

.,-,-,,--.--c..w%,,wm-,,.---w%,

,.,,, - -. +, -,..

v.

,.,_,,-,-o

.w,-c-,, - - -,,

z.

.,.. o - -

s -,.

.s s

~.

D.

U

letion hs to havan: P.eeu--suce.

Tne 7endor has instructed thsir Plant sad Field Superi= er,dants to use pieces of scrap stainless, wood, or sabestoa to shield th.e*

stainless steel surfa:es fro: iron contamic.stion during

• cur =i=g.

grint.ing, and wlding operaiiicca when contamication ec oce.,u.

Tcis activity is bei:g-a.snitored by Vendor 8s ?last and Si.4 Q, A.

Depart =act.-

(2)

Corre:tive Stees, Tha Ve: dor Site Q.i. %: agar-initiated a: - I -inseri=g Corrective A: ica ?equest (ICa?.) a:d deasribed tha co:confor=asce. Tne Eas, was suhe.itted to Vendor hoject X:gineer in ac:ordancs with Section 6.0 of the Ve: dor Q.A. )G pal. Ar. approved Corrective Action w'nich specified that the.s.rea fobe cleaned in accordece.with Vendor Cisas; Procedes CF-1 a:9hs=ised f= accords:ca with Liquid Penetract I:-

ape: tion hoebiura,0FI-01 to. fi d say hidden stress cerrosion cracks that =sy have oc:cred was.impy "s,ented.

v 1 tion Teso to hsv.st R4eurre::..

Paper will o:1y be ussi for-shippi g a=d storags and will be r s J.4 p

before field f:hrication. In aidition the rs= oval of the paper prlor

- r" *.

to field fabrication wilhelimissta the possibility of. co=t +. tie:

rs =ranca.

O es esp eep p

e mo me ee+***

e8D e

t l

t pauma r-s.

S r,

4D

.[

f~

o./;.==

.e t

fs s_J

< ' ~ - -

ATTAc*4MEM-IIT Reseces= to I:e= C of Artendix f Deficianev Criterio: V of Appendix 3 of 10 CTR 50 requires, in part, char: " Activities affecting qvality shall be

~

acco=plished in accordance wich'thesa

.....proceduras."

The L1=erick PSAF., Appendia D, parasraph D.1 stacas, in part, that: "(Philadelphia Electri:) is responsibia for coorainating the_(quality Assurance) program to assure that all necessary control _raquire=ents and proceduras followed...... LechtelcJob pule C-5 for Design are Document Control, paragrdph 4.2.3.4,-directs that "Upon receipt from Project Engineari=g of an acceptable Quality Assurance Manual (and chatges thereco) it is forwarded to Document Contro.1 for logging.....".

Contrary to the a* cove, en March 8, 1977, the latest-i

/*

approved amend = ants (Nos.'I'and 4) to Testing and-k' Inspectidn Procedure 3.20.A.1.-were not entered in two controlled volumes of the Peabody Testing Quality Assursnce Plan at separate on-sita locations.

I s

'Reseosse The Bechtel controlled copies of Peabody's Manual have been reviewed and updated cz neesssary.

To prevent a recurrence of this, Job Rula C-5 for Design l.

Document Control has been revised to = ora clearly describe t

the process of controlling Eachtal copies of field sub-contractors' QA manuals.

PDM is the only subco= tractor on site working on safety related equip = ant.besides

~

?mabody, at the present time.

Eachtel ecpias of PDM's QA Hanual'arv being reviewed and will be updated if necesecry within 30 days from the data of this letter.

f 3echtel copies of other site subcontractor QA ennuals will-L be reviewed and ravised if necessary, prior to the time L

vhen the subcontractors arrive or return to the site.

I t

fs op

,,,pp as

1. *W'We*W uto <

h e

e m.'=.

..... _ _. _,,,. _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _,..... ~. _ _.... _ _ _., _.. _ _. _ _ _... _,.