ML20099E698

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response Supporting TMI Alert Motion for Directed Certification on Exclusion of Testimonies of Former Commissioners P Bradford & V Gilinsky Re Restart Remand on Mgt.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20099E698
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/1984
From: Weiss E
HARMON & WEISS, UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
To:
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
CON-#484-269 SP, NUDOCS 8411260025
Download: ML20099E698 (5)


Text

w-

't-1-

f.

i L*i k

. November 21~,'1984 t'

000KETED Jt gr-Ay l'

'M OV 23 A11;38 T

BEFORE Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND. LICENSING APPEAL BOARD

.m -- g_p G:

b:

60'

)-

t

. j.

In the Matter of

)

METh0POLITAN-EDISON COMPANY

)

Docket No.' 50-289 j1

)-

(Restart Remand'on 1-(Three Mile Island Nuclear

).

Managemen t).

I Station, Unit No. 1)

)

.;i

)

li' a

d-UNION-OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS

'l RESPONSE TO TMIA'S MOTION FOR DIRECTED.

CERTIFICATION ON EXCLUSION OF TESTIMONY OF FORMER NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONERS PETER BRADFORD AND VICTOR GILINSKY 1

.i

I The Union of Concerned Scientists supports TMIA's motion and

.I 3

urges the Appeal Board to accept certification of the questions presented and to direct the admission of the evidence in i

if question.

We believe the following arguments are most

'I persuasive:

1.

Given the ambiguity of NRC reporting requirements, the i

Commissioners are the best, if not the only, source of I

information on the materiality or the information conveyed and

.I

-i not conveyed by Mr. Dieckamp to the contemporaneous decisions i

taken and contemplated by the Commission.

There is no other

!i it

!~

credible source of evidence on this subject.

e 2.

Dr. Gilinsky's conversation with Mr. Dieckamp j.

]

indisputably prompted the mailgrua.

His testimony is clearly j.

relevant to Dicckamp's state of mind, which is one of tne central 1

1 issues presented.

)

l}

A h

\\go

~

8411260025 841121 4

PDR ADOCK 05000289

~

3 q:

't.]

3.

.GPU has presented opinion evidence on many of the same 5

[

subjects,'particularly-the interpretation which " experts" placed or.would have placed on the:information available during the accident. -(See TMIA Memorandum of Points and Authorities, pp.

S' 19-21)

The obvious purpose of the GPU testimony is to argue that' A.-l the data on the1 pressure spike'would have_been of no value to the f

)

Commission in its deliberations and hence was-not material.

The former Commissioners are in a position to rebut this claim.

It a

l is manifestly unfair.to allow GPU to present this evidence but-to i

deny TMIA an opportunity to meet it.

4.

The NRC rules specifically permit the subpoenaing of 3

I witnesses whose testimony has relevance but who cannot or will not provide prefiled testimony as a witness for a party.

1..u s,

j the argument that this would be unfair is unpersuasive.

Moreover, GPU has Mr. Bradford's deposition, could have ' deposed Dr. Gilinsky and clearly has the resources and ability to fully mitigate any surprise.

Indeed, the Zebroski and vanwitbeck testimonies are substantially pre-emptive rebuttal of the a

Bradford and Gilinsky cvidence.

5.

The Ethics in Government Act is inapplicable to the i

Sworn testimony of facts within the personal knowledge of the 1

individual and to opinions derived therefrom.

(Id. at 23) j_

Respectfully submitted,

'[

c e

2 a

U Ellyn R. Weiss General Counsel Union of Concerned Scientists Harmon, Weiss & Jordan 2001 S Street, N.W.

Suite 430 Washington, D.C.

20036 (202) 328-3500 a

r

c DC: O T' November 21, 198'4 UMEC il

'24' NOV 23 - All :39

).

1 BEFORE. Tile ATOMIC SAFETY OFFLE 7 HCRE # -

d 5 SLRN-UCCdiy?,ANCH AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD t

t I

)

i In the Matter of

)

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY

)

Docket No. 50-289

,l.

)

(Restart Remand on (Three Mile Island Nuclear

)

Management)

J Station, Unit No. 1)-

)

-j

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE tt I hereby certify that copies of the UCS' RESPONSE TO TMIA'S MOTION FOR DIRECTED CERTIFICATION ON EXCLUSION OF TESTIMONY OF 1

j FORMER NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONERS PETER BRADFORD'AND VICTOR GILINSKY, were served on those-indicated on_the accompanying

.p Service List.

Service was made by deposit in The United States i

mail, first class, postage prepaid, on November 21, 1984, except those indicated by an asterisk were delivered by hand.

.i j

1, Ellyn R. Weiss i

k'

7

c...

1 v

4 UNITED STATES OFLAMERICA t-

' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS(0N BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARb

In the Matter.of

.)

P

)

N METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY

,)'

Docket No.- 50-289

}'

)

(Restart Remand on:

};

..(Three-Mile. Island Nuclear

).

_ Management) j; Station, Unit Jh). 1)

)

y

)

1;

!s SERVICE-LIST f p.- Administrative Judge *-

Jack R.

Goldberg, Esq.

'! Gary.J..Edlec,-Chairman Office of the Executive. Legal Dir.

ii Atomic' Safety & Licensing Appeal Bd.

d'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

. j 'Wasning ton,

D.C.

.20555 Washington, D.C.. 20555 4

Administrative Judge o

Ernest L.

Blake,-Jr. Esquire Jonn H.

Buck

,'Atomte Safety & Licensing Appeal Bd.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1800 M Street, N.W.

Wasnington, D.C.

-20555

-Washington, D.C.

20036 Administrative Judge H Christine N.

Kon1 Ms. Louise Bradford Atomic Saf ety & Licensing Appeal Bd.-

TMI Alert U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1011 Green Street Wasnington, D.C.

20555 Harrisburg, PA 17102 Administrative Judge Ivan W.

Smith, Chairman Joanne Doroshaw, Esquire Atomic. Safety & Licensing Board The Christic Institute U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1324 North Capitol Street

. Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20002 Administrative Judge Sneldon J. Wolfe Mr. and Mrs. Norman Aamodt Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Bd.

R.D.

5 U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission Coatesville, PA 19320 aWashington, D.C.

20555 p-Indministrative Judge Lynne Bernabei, Esq.

-Gustave A.

Linenberger, Jr.

Government Accountability Project Atomic Safety & Licensing Board 1555 Connecticut Ave.

-U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory-Commission Washington, D.C.

20009 Washington, D.C.

.20555

- Docketing and: Service Section Michael F.

McBride, Esq.

.; Office of the' Secretary LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

U.S.; Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1333 New Hampshire Ave, N.W.
  1. 1100 (Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20036 S.

W" e

A

+

.i

( -

'J

'3

- - A =1 g liichnol W'..'Mr.upin h,dsqul l

- j-JI ' ' Hunton - E-Willican,

707.: Cast Main Street

. i. :-

--P.O.

Box ~.1535

'T Richmond,-VA~ 23212

..i. -

.I; Thdmas '. Y. - Au,. Esq..

Office.of-Chief. Counsel O[

'Copartment--of Environmental Resources

,1 ;

'505. Executive' Houses T

.P.O.

Box 2357:

1. -

~ j :.

Ila r r isbu rg e-PA :17120.

4-

6

~p:

-* Hand Delivered fh-a

,.1

.t,

I'

'j.

5 1 %

<4

.y. _e iI.

a

.I' b

f*

i*

r sl. '...

x

.?k

. n

..c

'4I

  • g4

.I '

e..

.. o.

a-p r.* '