|
---|
Category:FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MONTHYEARML20098F0851984-09-28028 September 1984 Response to Case 840909 Proposed Findings of Fact on Welding Issues.Stiner Allegations Not Reflective of Systematic Breakdown in Qa/Qc Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098F0781984-09-28028 September 1984 Response to NRC 840907 Proposed Findings of Fact on Welding Issues.Five Open Items Identified ML20097B7241984-09-0909 September 1984 Proposed Findings of Fact on Welding Issues.Aslb Must Hear Ring of Truth in Testimony of Stiners.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096H1801984-09-0707 September 1984 Proposed Findings of Fact in Form of Partial Initial Decision Re Welding Issues.Stiner Allegations Do Not Reflect Systematic Breakdown in Qa/Qc Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096D0401984-09-0404 September 1984 Prehearing Proposed Findings of Fact Re Allegations of Harassment,Intimidation & Threats of QC Inspectors. Intervenor Failed to Demonstrate Breakdown of Qa/Qc Program. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080N7991984-02-16016 February 1984 Expected Findings of Fact for 840220-24 Hearings Re Welding Issues.Findings Summarize Principal Arguments & Give Fair Notice of Position.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080M8011984-02-16016 February 1984 Expected Findings of Fact Re Independent Assessment Program to Be Raised During 840220-24 Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080M6531984-02-16016 February 1984 Expected Findings of Fact Re Welding Issues to Be Raised During 840220-24 Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024E9931983-09-0606 September 1983 Reply to Citizens Assoc for Sound Energy Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law on Walsh/Doyle Allegations Re Pipe Support Design.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076F0741983-08-22022 August 1983 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Walsh/Doyle Allegations.Errata Sheet & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024E3181983-08-0505 August 1983 Proposed Findings of Fact in Form of Partial Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071B9541983-02-25025 February 1983 Proposed Findings of Fact in Form of Partial Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071B7861983-02-24024 February 1983 Provisional Proposed Findings of Fact.Certificate of Svc Encl 1984-09-09
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20196G4021999-06-18018 June 1999 Comment on FRN Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy NUREG-1600, Rev 1 & Amend of 10CFR55.49.Concurs with Need to Provide Examples That May Be Used as Guidance in Determining Appropriate Severity Level for Violations as Listed ML20206H1881999-05-0606 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App K Re ECCS Evaluation Models. Commission Grants Licensee Exemption ML20206M5111999-04-30030 April 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e). Recommends That Listed Approach Be Adopted for Changes to Documents Incorporated by Ref CY-99-007, Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-0071999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-007 TXX-9825, Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps ML20154C4101998-09-30030 September 1998 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Comanche Peak Electric Station Endorses NEI Comment Ltr & Agrees with NEI Recommendations & Rationale ML20216E1051998-04-0707 April 1998 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1029 Titled Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-related Instrumentation & Control Sys ML20217H3611998-03-26026 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft GL 97-XX, Lab Testing of Nuclear Grade Charcoal, Issued on 980225.Advises That There Will Be Addl Implementation Costs ML20198Q4851998-01-16016 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane That Requests NRC Amend Regulations Re Emergency Planning to Require Consideration of Sheltering,Evacuation & Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20211A4871997-09-12012 September 1997 Changes Submittal Date of Response to NRC RAI Re Proposed CPSES risk-informed Inservice Testing Program & Comments on NRC Draft PRA Documents ML20149L0311997-07-21021 July 1997 Comment on Draft Guides DG-1048,DG-1049 & DG-1050.Error Identified in Last Line of DG-1050,item 1.3 of Section Value/Impact Statement.Rev 30 Should Be Rev 11 ML20140A4871997-05-27027 May 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Safety Conscious Work Environ.Util Agrees W/Nuclear Energy Inst Comment Ltr ML20133G5411996-12-0505 December 1996 Transcript of 961205 Meeting in Arlington,Tx Re Comanche Peak Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers. Pp 1-111 ML20135B7881996-11-29029 November 1996 Order Approving Corporate Restructuring of TU to Facilitate Acquistion of Enserch Corp ML20128M8011996-10-0303 October 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations ML20097D7321996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re CPSES Request for Amend to Its Regulations Dealing W/Emergency Planning to Include Requirement That Emergency Planning Protective Actions for General Public Include Listed Info ML20094Q6421995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for RM PRM-50-62 Re Amend to Regulation Re QAPs Permitting NPP Licensees to Change Quality Program Described in SAR W/O NRC Prior Approval If Changes Do Not Potentially Degrade Safety or Change TSs ML20094H4801995-11-0808 November 1995 Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Proposed Rules 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste ML20091M6441995-08-25025 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Believes That NRC Should Reconsider Need for Ipap or SALP in Light of Redundancy ML20086M7921995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Process for Changes to Security Plan Without Prior NRC Approval ML20084A0181995-05-19019 May 1995 Comment Suporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Containment Leakage Testing.Supports NEI Comments ML20077M7311994-12-30030 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20077L8711994-12-22022 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,55 & 73 Re Reduction of Reporting Requirements Imposed on NRC Licensees ML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20058E0561993-11-10010 November 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule Re Staff Meetings Open to Public. Believes That NRC Has Done Well in Commitment to Provide Public W/Fullest Practical Access to Its Activities ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20045D8321993-06-11011 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Update Submittals. ML20044F3271993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp, Fr Vol 58,Number 52.NRC Should Use EPRI Definitions for Critical Characteristics ML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056C1881993-03-17017 March 1993 Order.* Directs Util to Respond to Motion by COB 930319 & NRC to Respond by COB 930322.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930317 ML20128D9651993-02-0303 February 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Stay Request Filed by Petitioners Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930203 ML20128F6221993-02-0303 February 1993 Transcript of 930203 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Public Meeting in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-2.Related Info Encl ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D3461993-01-29029 January 1993 NRC Staff Notification of Issuance of OL for Facility.* Low Power License May Be Issued by 930201.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D6321993-01-29029 January 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Citizens for Fair Util Regulation for Fr Notice Hearing on Proposed Issuance of OL for Facility.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930129 ML20127L9321993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Re Architzel Re Thermo-Lag Installation at Testing for Unit 2.* Statement of Prof Qualifications Encl ML20128D6111993-01-26026 January 1993 Joint Affidavit of I Barnes & Ft Grubelich Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Discusses Issues Re Borg-Warner Check Valves Raised by Cfur & Adequacy of Actions Taken by TU Electric ML20127L9181993-01-26026 January 1993 NRC Staff Reply to Cfur Request for Publication of Proposed Action Re Licensing of Unit 2.* Cfur Request That Notice Re Licensing of Unit 2 Be Published Permitting Parties to Request Hearings Should Be Denied ML20127L9661993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Rl Pettis Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Statement of Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127L9091993-01-25025 January 1993 Tx Util Electric Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Request of 930113.* Request Fails to Raise Worthy Issue & Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127L8891993-01-21021 January 1993 Order.* License Should File Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Ltr Requesting That Commission Issue Fr Notice Providing for Opportunity for Hearing Re Issuance of OL by 930125.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930122 ML20127G9191993-01-19019 January 1993 Order.* Grants Petitioners Extension of Time Until 930122 to File Brief.Replies to Petitioners Brief Shall Be Filed on or Before 930208.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930119 ML20127G9441993-01-19019 January 1993 TU Electric Brief in Opposition to Petitioners Appeal of ASLB Memorandum & Order.* Requests That Petitioners Appeal Be Denied & Licensing Board 921215 Memorandum & Order Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G8041993-01-15015 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Appeal of Licensing Board Decision Denying Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Filed by Bi & Di Orr.* Board 921215 Decision Should Be Upheld.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127G7451993-01-14014 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Motion of Petitioners RM Dow & SL Dow, (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station),For Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7941993-01-12012 January 1993 Opposition of TU Electric to Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station) & RM Dow.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A5931993-01-0808 January 1993 Brief in Support of Petitioner Notice of Appeal.Aslb Erred by Not Admitting Petitioner Contention & Action Should Be Reversed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A6371993-01-0707 January 1993 Notice of Appeal.* Appeal Submitted Due to 921215 Memo Denying Petitioner Motion for Rehearing & Petition for Intervention & Request for Hearings.Proceedings Were Terminated by Aslb.W/Certificate of Svc 1999-06-18
[Table view] |
Text
.
00LKETED U3NHC
'84 001 -1 A9 :29 September 28, 1984 (FF1Ecr d - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 00MEIj'[{f.[f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
) Docket Nos. 50-445 and TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC ) 50-446 p[g g COMPANY, et al.
-- -~
)
) (Application for (Comanche Peak Steam Electric ) Operating Licenses)
Station, Units 1 and 2) )
APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO THE NRC STAFF'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT ON WELDING ISSUES I. INTRODUCTION On September 7, 1984, Texas Utilities Electric Company, et al. (" Applicants") and the Nuclear Legulatory Commission ("NRC")
Staff filed proposed finding of fact regarding welding issues raised by Citizens Association for Sound Energy (" CASE") in the captioned proceeding.1 CASE filed proposed findings on these issues on September 9, 1984.2 During the conference call of 1 " Applicants' Proposed Findings of Fact In the Form of a Partial Initial Decision"(September 7, 1984)(" Applicants Proposed Findings"); "NRC Staff Proposed Findings of Fact on Weld Fabrication"(September 7, 1984)(" Staff Proposed Findings").
2 " CASE's Proposed Findings of Fact on Welding Issues" (September 9, 1984)(" CASE's Proposed Findings").
8410020293 840928 PDR ADOCK 05000445 p.5o.1
b -
's September 5, 1984, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ("Licen-sing Board") stated that all parties could file responses by September 28, 1984 (Tr. 4,269).
While Applicants have not reviewed in detail the Staff Proposed Findings, from a cursory review Applicants concur in large measure with the Staff's efforts. However, Applicants' are concerned regarding the Staff's characterization that there may be five "possible" open items, viz., "(i) welders making sub-jective determinations as to whether the preheat requirement of Procedure 11032 has been satisfied, (ii) the significance of the alleged failure of welders at CPSES to use temperature indicating equipment to verify interpass temperatures; (iii) undocumented repair welds on . . . hangers in the north cable spread room discovered by the Staff; (iv) pipe support H-CC-1-SB-038-010-3, alleged by Mr. Stiner to contain a downhill weld; and (v) the alleged failure of OC to verify welder symbols on Class 5 hangers." Staff's Proposed Findings at 58. These issues are adCressed below.
A. Interpass Temperature In its proposed findings (at p. 26), the Staff states that Mr. and Mrs. Stiner made allegations in their prefiled testimony (at p. 11) regarding checking interpass temperature and preheat using temperature indicating crayons. Applicants note that this testimony was stricken at Tr. 9,960. However, the subject of interpass temperature as it applies to heat input regarding weave
r .a --
L ', i
)
welds was an issue in'this case. (See e.g., Staff Proposed Finding at 23-30; Applicants Proposed Findings at 31-35.)
Further, whether.or not Mr. Stiner_ preheated welds was an issue
-in-the' case. (See-e.g., Staff Proposed Findings at 30-32; Applicants' Proposed Findings at 72-77.)
With regard to the issue of use of temperature indicating crayons, although it was not admitted as an issue in this pro-ceeding, 'the Board directed the Staff to look into the issue and make a report to the Board on whether an investigation was war-ranted. Tr._9,959. However, the fact that the Board asked for a report from the Staff does not raise a concern to the level of an
- open issue ~ subject to findings. Indeed, this is contrary to the Board's direction that when testimony is stricken "it is not a
. subject for findings." (Tr. 10,480.)
B. Preheat
-In;its proposed findings (at p. 30), the Staff states that the Board struck page 9 of CASE Exhibit 919 and directed the
. Staff to. report to the Board regarding the issue of preheat.
(The Staff,.in any event, proposed f'ndings i regarding this issue (Staff Proposed Findings at'30-32).) Applicants note that when they-first moved that this testimony be stricken (Tr. 9,947-8),
the Board stated that either the issue would be' addressed on the record or the Staff would be required to investigate the allega-tion and report to the Board (Tr. 9,949). In view of the options, Applicants chose to withdraw the motion to strike in
_ - _ . _ _ _ . , - . _ . _ ._ _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ , - . . - _ . _ ~ .
.yr R,
,4
~
order to handle the issue in the proceeding (Tr. 9,949-50). In
.short, the testimony was not stricken and, apparently there was no need for the Staff to provide a report to the Board on this
~
issue. Indeed, testimony was presented by all parties (see e.g.,
Staff's Proposed Findings at 30-32; Applicants' Proposed Findings at 72-77; CASE chose not to file proposed findings on this issue). Accordingly, Applicants question whether the Staf f is correct in stating that the Board directed it to provide a report on this issue (see note 4, p. 32 of the Staff's Proposed Findings).3 C. Downhill Welding In its proposed findings, the Staff states that there may
-possibly be an open item associated with this issue because the Staff had requested a report from Applicants on the structural adequacy of one hanger which Mr. Stiner alleged contained one downhill weld. Staff Proposed Findings at 37 and 58.
Significantly, whether-the support is structurally adequate does E
not even address the issue of whether a downhill weld was or was 3 In this regard, Applicants submit that contrary to the Staff's Proposed Findings, there is no allegation in the record made by either Mr. or Mrs. Stiner "that welders do not check to make certain that the temperature prior to welding is at g least 60 F for materials less than 1 1/4" thick and 200 F for materials more that [ sic] 1 1/4" in thickness." -Staff Proposed Findings at 32. Perhaps the Staff was loosely referring to Mr. and Mrs. Stiner's testimony in this regard which was stricken (CASE Exhibit 919 at 11-12, stricken at Tr. 9,960).
".o 1
F
.not-made. For the reasons set forth in Applicants ' Proposed Findings at 42, Applicants maintain that this is not an "open item" subject to findings.
D. Weld Symbols on Class 5 Hangers In its proposed findings, the Staff correctly notes that although the Board struck Mrs. Stiner's testimony regarding weld symbols on hangers which have been cut down, the Board directed the Staff to provide a report on the issue. Staff Proposed Findings at note 7, pp. 45-6. As with the issue of interpass temperature, Applicants note the Board's direction that issues stricken from the record are not subject to findings (Tr.
10,480).
E. Weld Repair of Misdrilled Holes
.The Staff states that in view of its request to Ipplicants to provide information on three supports containing misdrilled holes, this issue may be a possible open item. Staff Proposed Findings at 57 and 58. As set forth in Applicants' Proposed Findings at 60-72-(particularly 72), Applicants disagree.
III. CONCLUSION From the foregoing and Applicants Proposed Findings, Applicants maintain that the allegations raised by Mr. and Mrs.
Stiner'(i.e., weave welding, welding of misdrilled holes, down-hill welding, weld rod control and preheat) are not reflective of
s-
-a significant.or systematic breakdown in the OA/QC program. In addition,' Applicants maintain that there is reasonable assurance that!these allegations are not reflective of any condition that could adversely impact the safe operation of the plant.
Respectfully submitted, W
Nicholas S'. Keynolds Malcolm H. Philips, Jr.
William A. Horin BISHOP, LIBERMAN, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 857-9800
, Counsel for Applicants September 28, 1984 k
t b
, - - - - , , . , , . - - , . -- ,--+.-,-n,,-,, -
-nar ,,,-.nn -- -,,, , - + , - , - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - , , , ~ . - ,--