ML20098E760
| ML20098E760 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 09/24/1984 |
| From: | Woolever E DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 2NRC-4-151, NUDOCS 8410010361 | |
| Download: ML20098E760 (4) | |
Text
a
'Af 4 2 78 4i (412) 923-1960 Nuclear Construction Divisi^n Robinson Plaza. Building 2. Suite 210 Telecopy (412) 787-2629 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 September 24, 1984 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch 3 Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Electrical Separation R.G. 1.75 Information Gentlemen:
The status of the BVPS-2 program to achieve compliance with its commitment to Regulatory Guide 1.75 Rev. 2 and IEEE-384-74 was presented to the NRC during a site meating on August - 30, 1984.
Copies of the conference notes and presentation slides were submitted to the NRC with our letter 2NRC-4-143 dated September 14, 1984.
During the August 30 meeting, NRC representatives requested a des-cription of the relationship between our implementation sc ope and plan for consequential work and future test program results, future licens ing (FSAR) submittals and future vaikdowns of electrical separation within panels.
The attached flow chart ( Atta :hment 1) has been developed to identify the rela-tionships among these to or (4) ef forts.
It should be noted, as shown on Attachment 1, that " Case 1" is the consequential work scope and schedule that was discussed at our August 30, 1984 meeting and was included in our September 14, 1984 s ubmit tal. Case 1 is based upon the consequential work details presented during our December 20, 1983 meeting.
" Case 2" consequential work scope and schedule, as shown on Attach-ment 1, will be based upon implementation of the additional types of conse-quential work details that have already been found acceptable to the NRC.
" Case 3" consequential work scope and schedule, as shown on Attach-ment 1, will be based on test results that substantiate the bases for NRC acceptance of further reductions in the quantity of consequential work.
\\
8410010361 840924 PDR ADOCK 05000412 A
PDR I
I
i United States Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Page 2.
Since we have already established that Case I can be accommodated within the existing plant sch edule, and since Cases 2 and 3 will reduce the quantity of consequential work required to be performed, we believe that the attached flow cart describes a positive system for resolution of the elec-trical separation issue that is in our mutual best interest to complete.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
/
By E. 3. Woolever Vice President HMS/nm1
. Attachment cc:
Mr. C. Anderson, Region 1 (3) (w/ attachment)
Mr. J. Knox (w/ attachment)
Ms. M. Ley, Project Manager (w/ attachment)
Mr. G. Walton, Resident Inspector (w/ attachment)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA )
)
SS:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
)
I
, /((
, before me, a On this
,_,2 day of
~
/
m Notary Public in and for said Commonwealth and County, personally appeared E. J. Woolever, who being duly sworn, deposed and said that (1) he is Vice Pres ident of Duquesne Light, (2) he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing Submittal on behalf of said Company, and (3) the statements set forth in the Submittal are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.
s /&
Notary Public ANITA ELAINE REITER, NOTARY PUDLIC ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 20,1986
ATTACHMENT I FLOW CH ART wALKDOwM OF PANELS
" CASE 1" k " CASE l* CONSEQUENTIAL WORK FOR SEPARATON CONSEQUENTIAL WORM SCHEDULE START QUTSIDE PROBLEMS SCOPE & SCHEDULE
- MANMOLES IS t
S-IS 84 8 30 84 S-8S I
l x
W 9
DISCUSS " CASE 2" 06 CUSS TEST PROGRAM CONSEQUENTI AL WORK L EXPECTED RESULTS DETAILS wlTH NRC WITH NRC 9 26-84 S-26 83 INCORPORATE NRC INCDRPOR ATE NRC COMMENTS IN COMMENTS IN DE T AILS TEST PROGRAM AMEND g
FSAR i
t PERFORM TESTING START ll 184 DEVELOP SOLUTIONS
" CASE 2 END 12-30 84 FCR SEPARATION CONSEQUENTA. WORK PROBLEMS FOUND IN SCOPE & SCMIOVLE g
1-FINAL TEST REPORT g
I 2*28-85 ISSU R EwCM CONSEQUENTIAL NEMA Ng 13 h
,g WORK GREATER TMAN y
CISCUSS REPORT RESULTS 12-15-8 4 SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS
& REDUCTION OF CONSEQ FOR CASE 2 WORK elTH NRC IMPLEMENTATON 3.gg ROx S-85 N
INCCRPORATE NRC CCWWENTS IN DETAILS IMPLEMENT CASE 2 3-85 SCOPE OF
==
CONS EQUENTI AL WCRM
^
8ASE00N TEST G NRC 4
WEETING CECIDE ON IM P LEMENTATION OF TEST RESULTS Y
AMEND FSAR I
" CASES
- CONSEQUENTI AL WORs SCOPE & SC400LE IMPLEMENT CASE S CONSEQUENTIAL WORM
_-_m.__.
. United States. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. George lW. Knighton, Chief Page 3 HMS/nal L NR/NRC/ REG /175 Attachment bec: ' W. T. Wardzinski (w/o/ attachment)
C. E. Ewing T. D. Jones R. E. Dougher E.-F. Kurtz, Jr..
J..H. Latshaw T. P. Noonan J. A. Rocco
~
H. M. Siegel
~
R. J. Swiderski G. L. Beatty E.-T. Eilmann K. M. Holcomb J. F.' Konkus fJ. Lee, Esq..
R. E. Martin S. L. Pernick.Jr.
T. lJ. Zog1mann D. E. Burke (CEI)
R. G. Schuerger (CEI)
E. A..Licitra (NRC)
G. Walton (NRC)'
W. T. Keller (NUTEC)
B.'M. Miller (2) (OEC)
,J. Silberg (SPPT)
D. Chamberlain (S&W)
T. J. Lex (W)
~
J. J. Carey (w/ attachment)
E. J. Wooiever J. A. Hultz P. RaySircar (S&W)
C. R. Bishop (S&W)
NCD File'
.