ML20098C835

Application for Amend to License DPR-50,consisting of Tech Spec Change Request 140 to Allow Better Radiation Monitoring Equipment Inventory Control

ML20098C835
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	09/24/1984
From:	Hukill H GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20098C823	List: ML20098C821 ML20098C835 ML20098C846
References
NUDOCS 8409270229
Download: ML20098C835 (4)

Text

-

s METROPOLITAN EDIS0N COMPANY JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Technical Specification Change Request No. 140 This Technical Specification Change Request is submitted in support of Licensee's request to change Appendix A to Operating License No.

DPR-50 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. As a part of this request, proposed replacement pages for Appendix A are also included.

GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION BY

' lirect6r, TMI-1 Sworn and Subscribed to before me this n day of A m a.aii, 1984.

h _a .s m.2 % . . -

Nothy Public 4 DAptA flA8 8IRRY. motAuf PMIC m;D0ttIOWN B000. DAUPHIA C0 gell NY C0eutt$104 f!PIRIS JUNI 17.1945 speber Peentytvania Anocataa of Netwes O h9 PDR l

l

c UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF DOCKET NO. 50-289 LICENSE NO. DPR-50 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION This is to certify that a copy of Technical Specification Change Request No 140 to Appendix A of the Operating License for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1. has, on the date given below, been filled with executives of Londonderry Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources.

Bureau of Radiation Protection, by deposit in the United States mail, addressed as follows:

Mr. Jay H. Kopp, Chairman Mr. John E. Minnich, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Board of County Commissioners Londonderry Township of Dauphin County R. D. fl. Geyers Church Road Dapuhin County Courthouse Middletown, PA 17057 Harrisburg, PA 17120 Mr. Thomas Gerusky, Director Pa. Dept. of Environmental Resources Bureau of Radiation Procection P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA. 17120 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORA ION BY Direct 6r, TMI-1 DATE: september 24, 1984

~. ___ _ - -__ - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

P .

I. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 140 The' Licensee requests that the attached revised page replace the following page of the existing Technical Specifications.

Replace page 6-21 II. REASON FOR CHANGE This change is requested in an effort to provide consistency in the TMI-l and Oyster Creek Technical' Specifications. It will also allow a better radiation monitoring equipment inventory control. Worker productivity will be-increased and radiation exposure thereby reduced by allowing radiation dose rates to be measured by an individual for the group.

III. SAFETY EVALUATION JUSTIFYING CHANGE The individual (s) entering a high rddiation-area are required to wear a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and self-reading pocket dosimeter in order to record the radiation dose received. The Technical Specification requirement is an administrative requirement to ensure personnel are aware of the dose rate and to assure exposure limits are not exceeded in High Radiation. Areas. The dose of record is obtained from an individual's TLD. Other exposure control measures are taken for high radiation area entry. These are stay-time determinations, pre-job

-radiation surveys, and pre-job briefings. It is therefore believed that the additional administrative requirements are satisfactory if applied to a group as well as to the individual. In this discussion, " group" refers-to individuals entering a small area to work together. Due to the above, this Technical Specification change' does not reduce the margin of safety to personnel.

IV. NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION The proposed changes provide enhanced administrative controls, are administrative in nature-and:

1) do not affect plant design or operation and, therefore, would not involve a signifiant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated

2) do not involve modifications to plant equipment and, therefore, would not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated

3) :do not involve changes which would affect the safety analysis of the plant, and, therefore, would not involve a significant reduction in a

.c margin of safety.

S

• T V. IMPLEMENTATION It is requested that this amendment become effective upon issuance.

_ AMENDMENT FEE (10 CFR 170.21)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 170.21, a check for $150.00 will be sent under separate cover for this submittal.

a