ML20097G169

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Approval of Encl Proposed Change to QA Program, Revising Section 1B.1, Corporate Organization & Specific Responsibilities
ML20097G169
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/1992
From: Creel G
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9206160334
Download: ML20097G169 (5)


Text

_. _ _ - _ -

A DALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRI 1650 CALVERT CtJFFS PARKWAY LUSBY, MARYLAND 20657 4702 Gromot C CntcL vies enconocest WCtsam [tethov t..on. -....

June 12,1992 U. S. N lcar Regulatory Corumission Washington,DC 20555 ATI ENTION:

Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Calvert Ci4Ts Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. i & 2: Docket Nos.50 317 & 50-318 Proposed Chance to Ouality Assurance Procram Gentlemen:

l l

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3), Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BO&E) hereby requests approval of a proposed change to the Quality Assuranca (QA) Program for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. I and 2. The proposed change would revise Section IB.1, Corporate Organization and Specific Responsibilities pages 5 and 9 of 55, of the Quality Assurance Policy. We propose to change the program as reaccted in the description shown on the attachment. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approvalis required prior to implementation of this change since the change can be viewed as constituting a reduction in the quality assurance program commitments as l

previously accepted. This portion of the program is also described in the Updated Final Sa cty r

Analysis Report (UFSAR), Chapter IB, Section 1, and Chapter 12, Section 5. 'Ihe UFSAR will be I

revised as part of the annual update.

The proposed change will give the Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Unit the responsibility for evaluating industry events for their applicability at Calvert Cliffs and dissolve the Plant Operating Experience Assessment Committee (POEAC) which currently - has that responsibility. The IOER Unit members have a diverse background in nuclear energy production related fields. They will work full time on evaluating industry events to provide better ownership and a more focussed review of individual issues. This change is designed to improve our review of Industry Operating Experience and was described in the BG&C Performance Improvement Plan,

-which has been provided to the NRC for resiew. Issues identified will be processed using Issue Reports which are part of a corrective action system at Calvert Cliffs. For the past year, IOER has screened industry information and presented their results to POEAC.

Their results have demonstrated that IOER can effectively identify and coordinate required responses without committee review. Their results have also demonstrated an improved timeliness in action.

Considering the above information, we conclude that the propw,:d change to our Quality Assurance Program will increase the effectiveness of the process for evaluating industry events for their applicability at Calvert Cliffs. Plant operation n accordance with the proposed change would continue to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. The Calvert Cliffs Off Site Safety Review Committee reviewed this proposed change ar d on Ma

'/

9206160334 920612

@/h/d/7/I PDR ADOCK 050003:7

-/

,M,,

I f/

sh#

DN g

i Document Control Desk June 12,1992 Page 2 the proposed change does not constitute a significant safety hazard.11ccause substitution of the full-time IOER Unit for the current committee method of handling industry operating event evaluation could be considered a reduction in the quality assurance program commitments as previously l

acce pted, NRC approval is requested. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, we will

-l be p: cased to discuss thern with you.

Very truly yours,

(/

/

[

j[

OCC/JV/jv/bjd

Attachment:

htarkup of QA Policy, Revision 28 i

cc:

D. A. Brune, Esquire

/

J. E. Silberg. Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. O. hicDonald, Jr., NRC T. T. hf artin. NR C P. R. Wilson, NRC l

R.1. hicLean, DNR J.11. Walter, PSC s

l l

___,....-._..;..u_,

v..

c m..

s QUA1Iry ASSURANCE POLICY Revision 30 Cormrate Oreanization and Specific Responsibilities ne Cor rate Organization Chart of the Baltimore Oas and Electric Company (BGAE)is shown in

[

Figure 1

1. Persons responsible for the principal elements of the Company's Quality Assurance (OA) Program are as follows:(1)

Chairman of the Board Vice Chairman Vice President Nuclear Energy Division (NED)

Plant General Manager Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Department (CCNPPD)

Manager Nuclear Engineering Department (NED)

Manager Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD)

Manager Nuclear Safety & Planning Department (NSPD)

Manager Nuclear Support Services Department (NSSD)

/

Manager Nuclear Outage & Project Management Department (NOPMD)

In addition to these individuah, the Vice Presidents of the Fossil Energy Division (FED), Electric Interconnection and Transmission Division (EITD), General Services Division (GSD), and the Management Services Dhision (MSD), as well as the Managers of the Electric Test Department (ETD), Purchasing & Materials Management Department (PMMD), Information Systems Department (ISD), Generation Maintenance Department (GMD), Fossil Engineering Department (FFD), and the Safety and Medical Services Department (SMSD) are assigned support responsibilities. (1) ne above Managers coastitute the Nuclear Program Managers who are assigned responsibilities within the QA Program.

Also, two advisory groups perform quality related functions for plant operations. Dese are the Plant Operations and Safety Review Committee (POSRC) and the Off Site Safety Review Committee (OSSRC) whose makeup and responsibilities ate described in the *I3s for CCNPP.

4 app bili si t

Chairman of the Board and Vice Chairman of the Company BG&E's QA Program fo nuclear power plants is established under the authority of the Chairman of the Bosrd and the Vice Charman of the Company, who are responsible for establishing the overall QA Policy. ney assign project responsibilities to the organizations shown in heavy lined boxes in 3

Figure 1B 1. (1)

]

The Chairman of the Board assigns authority throeth the Vice Chairman to the Vice President.

Nuclear Energy Division. Primary responsibilities for developing, implementing, and maintaining the QA Program are assigned to Department Managers by the Vice President-Nuclear Energy Division.

Managers deley ae their authority as required to implement their responsibilities. (1)

Page S of 55

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Revision 30 Develo 3 ment and integration of programs necessary to operate Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power ?lant up to and beyond its current licensed lifetime; reliability engineering; and documentation and maintenance of plant design bases.

I Manacer. Nuclear Outag,e and Project Manseement Dengtment The Manager.NOPMD is responsible for directing the efforts of personnel and providing 1

resources necessary to support site integrated scheduling, outage management and project management for assigned projects. He organization of NOPMD is shown in Chapter 12 of the UFSAR. The Manager.NOPMD delegates responsibilities for accomplishing tbc following actMtles:

Developing, implementing and maintaining a site integrated schedule which schedules all s!gnificant plant related activities at CCNPP.

i i

i Managing the planning. scheduling and performing of all outages at CCNPP.

Providing overall project management for engineering, procurement, construction and testing of nuclear power plant modification for CCNPP.

i Manacer. Nuclear Safety and Plannine Department ne Manager.NSPD is responsible for dirating licensing activities, independent safety evaluation activities, strategic planning and emergency plann ng.

ne organization of NSPD is shown in Chapter 12 of the UFSAR. The Manager-NSPD delegates responsibilities for accomplishing the following activities:

Providing licensing services including preparation and review of nuclear safety, accident and transient analysis; coordination and operation of various industry information exchange systems; evaluation of plant events and conditions adverse to quality for reportability to the NRC and other agencies, assisting in the investigation and evaluation of events, and preparation of the reports; coordination of tracking and 4

resolution of company commitments to the NRC; research and preparation of responses to NRC letters, bulletins, circulars and information notices; UFSAR research and revision control; maintenance and revision of the current licensing basis for nuclear power plants; cocedination of all compliance related communications with external agencies including assistance in ensuring their consistency with existing licensing basis commitments; and coordination of regulatory inspections and visits and company prescatations to the NRC.

Directing investigations of significant events to determine root cause, recommending -

correctrve action, and generating appropriate reports to document the investigation res#.s; directing a program for identifying trends within the corrective action systems.

k Directing the efforts of BG&E personnelinvolved in emergency planning activities.

Development of the aant'al Strategic plan for the Nuclear Encrgy Division including the Nuc! car Program Plan.

Directing the efforts of personnel under the Nuclear QA Program to develop, implement and coordinate the industrial saferv and fire protection program for the CCNPP, and to plan, schedule, and monitor activities directly related to safety, fire protection, and prevention.

ing reviews of the operating experience of other bility of significant events with respect to CCNPP. ( l L) plants of similar design to d Page 9 of 55

'#) ;,'7 QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY

'. J~' -

Revhion 23

..s; ATTACHMENTA BASES FOR QA POLICY REVISIONS (1)

Entry PRF.Q No.

A

. Bases for Revision (s) 1.

771 Procedure Uncrade Action Plan fPUAP). per LB. Russe 111etter 120-89.

2.

783 10 CFR Part 21 recuirements.

3.

797 NRC Insoection #8916S9-17 fletter from R. E Denton to R. P. Heibel dated fulv 13.1989.)

4 824 NRC letter from M. W. Hodres to G. C. Creel dated March 13.1990.

5.

844 Procurement Procram Project unnade. Performance Imorovement Plan fPTP) Action Plan #5.3.1 and OAU Audit Findint 8713-01 6.

8 14 1B.15 and 1Bd6 revised to clearly establish crorram anolicability and controls. consistent terininotory. orranizational responsibilities and focused sooroach towards develooine and imolementine an intecrated Manarement Sntem.

7.

891 PTP Action Plan 5.3.1 Follow On Activity.

8.

894 1B.15 and 1B.16 revised to clarify reouirements which will oermit imolementstion of the issues Mansrement Svstem - PIP item 4.10.0.

9.

854 S 07 G. C. Creel letter to the NRC dated 7/26S1 which discussed modifications to.

and accentance of. chances to the OA Poliev invoMnr OA wmoliance revieva of OAPs and Directfves.

10.

81 5 G. C. Creel letter to the NRC dated 10/3/90 discussino temocrarv chances not affectino "Accroved Procedure Intent

  • and the relievino of the Administrative Burden on ShNt Suoervisors.

11.

887 Audit Findine No.

9026 01 ilmolementation of Survoittance Recuirements).

'\\S3 PP inh %Twa

.:nw 4. t 12.

nuo uu ggt., _

Ac.Tyo,Q pup y Q~4W (TMCPketTbo Pt au ktuotend (TkM I.C. 5

  • Ps.ac cevite Fof. Fns!U<.tc cP OGesth7'IW kW.mR.It.vt2 3

9 Pt Auf' STAPP ".

Page 54 of 54 l

l I