ML20097D683
| ML20097D683 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 06/02/1992 |
| From: | Black S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20097D689 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9206110082 | |
| Download: ML20097D683 (7) | |
Text
1
},.
f"%,
[ " Ts N.
UNITED STATES i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$k
,[f WASHINoToN D.C. 20666
\\..
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXAS DOCKET NO. 50-498 EQUTH TEXAS PROJECT. UNIT _1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSJ s
Amendmant No. 37 License No. NPF-76 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The applicatien for amendment by Houston Lighting &. Power Company *
(HL&P) acting on behalf of itself and for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio (CPS), Central Power and Light Company (CPL),
and City of Austin, Texas (C0A) (the licensees) dated May 20, 1992, complies with the standardt and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter _I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rule., and regCations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance:
(i) that the~ activities authorized
)
by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health d
and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements'have been satisfied.
- Houston Lighting & Power Company is authorized to act for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Central Power and Light Company' and City of Austin, Texas and has exclusive responsibility and control over the physical construction, c;eration and maintenance of the facility.
9206110002 920602 PDR ADOCK 05000498 P
PDR 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Iechnical Specifi-cations as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and Paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-76 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.
Technical Soecifica lgni The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 37, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are heraby incorporated in the license.
'The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specificatians and the Environmental Protection Plan.
3.
The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (gtM(.
CA-Suzann( C. Black, Director Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:
June 2, 1992 4
i
ps 't%q Ig 6
32 " xY e
UldlTED STATES 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "ok m [jf W AbHINoToN, D.C. 20566 s
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CITY Of AUSTIN. TEXAS DOCKET NO. 50-499 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. VE1L2 AMENDMENT TO FACIlllY OPERAriNG LICENSE Amendment No. 28 License No. NPF-80 1.
The Nuclee.r Regulatory Commisuon (the Comission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Houston Lighting & Pcwer Company *
(HL&P) acting on behalf of itself and for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio (CPS), Central Power and Light Company (CPL),
and City of Austin, Texas (COA) (the licensees) dated May 20, 1992, complies with the standards and requirements of the. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; n
C.
There is reasonable assurance:
(i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 cf the Commission's regulations anC all applicable requirements,,a e
been satisfied.
- Houston Lighting & Power Company is authorized to act for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Central Power and Light Company and City of Austin, Texas and has exclusive responsibility and control over the physical constructior., operation and maintenance of the facility.
i:
I
.g.
2.-
Accordingly, the license is amended by i.._nges to the Technicai 5pecifi-cations as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and Paragraph 2.C.(2) of-Facility Operating License No. NPF-80 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.
Technical Specifications 4
The Tech,iical Specifications contained:in Appendix A, as revised 28 = and the Environmental Protection Plan through Amendment Ne..
contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license.
The licensee shall operate the fa'ility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
3.
The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.
'FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Xq',c.94. b34 L
1-Suzanne' C'. Black, Director I
Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reacter Projects-III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l
Attachment:
Cleanges to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:
June 2, 1992 l
l t:
4 t
y
-y
,, ewe w
- - - - m
-y y
~
m
,.m
-..v,
,r- - - - -
+,e
3.
3-
[
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NOS. 37 AtlD - 28 FACILITY OPEPATING LICENSE NOS. NPF-76 AND NPF-80 DOCKET N L _50-498'AND 50-499-j Replace the following page of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the e
attached page.
The revised rage _:is identified be amendment number and.
contains vertical lines' indicating the areas of change. The corresponding.
i overleaf page is also provided to maintain-document completeness.
REMOVE' INSERT 3/4 3-15' 3/4 3-15 I
i 4
i m e..
4
--,e
+,
l l
TABLE 4.3-1 (Continuad).
TABLE NOTATIONS (Continued)
(10)
Setpoint verification is not applicable.
J-(11) The TRIP ACTUATING DEVICE OPERATIONAL TEST shall independently verify the OPERABILITY of the undervoltage and shunt trip attachments of the Reactor Trip Breakers.
(l') OPERABILITY shall be verified by a check of memory devices, input ac-curacies, Boron Dilution Alarm setpcints, output values, and software futictions.
(13)
(Not used)
- (14) The TRIP ACTUATING DEVICE OPERATIONAL TEST shall independently verify the l
OPERABILITY of the undervoltage and shunt trip circuits for the Manual Reactor Trip Function. The test shall also verify the OPERABillTY of the Bypass Bret.ker trip circuit (s).
(15)
Local manual shunt trip prior to-placing breaker in service.
(16) Automatic t arvoltage trip.
(17)
Each channel shall be tested at least every 92 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS.
(18) The surveillance frequency and/or MODES specified for these channels in Table 4.3-2 are more restrictive and, therefore, arglicable.
- Complete verification of operability of the shunt trip-relay circuitry shall be initially implemented for each unit prior to the affected unit's-startup from the first planned or unplanned shutdown occurring after May 19, 1992.
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS-l & 2 3/4 3-15 Unit 1 - Arrendment No. 37 Unit 2 - Amendment No. 28
INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.2 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES ACTUATION SYSTEM-INSTRUMENTATYON LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION'
-3.3.2 -The Engineered Safety Features Actuation System (ESFAS) instrumentation-channels and interlocks shown in Table:3.3-3 'shall be-OPERABLE vith-their Trip Setpoints set consistent with the values shown in the Trip;Setpoint column of Table 3.3-4 and with RESPONSE TIMES as-sheen in Table 3.3-5.
1 APPLICABILITY; As shown in' Table 3.3-3.
ACTION:
s a.
With an ESFAS 'Instrumt.1tation or: Interlock Trip Setpoint trip less conservative than the value shown in the Trip:Setpoint column but more. conservative than the value shown-in the Allowable:Value enlumn of Table 3.3-4, adjust the Setpoint consisteht with the Trip Setpoint
- value, b.
Witn an ESFAS Instrucentation or Interlock Tr*:p Setpoint less conserva-tive than the:value shown-in the Allowable Value column of Table
- 3. 3-4, either:
1.
Adjust the Setpoint consistent with the-Trip Setpoint value of
)
Table 3.3-4, and determine within'12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> that Equation 2.2-1 was satisfied for the affected channe't; ori 2.
Declare the channel inoperable and' apply the applicable ACTION a
statement requirements of Table 3.3--3 until.the channel is restored to OPERABLE status with its Setpoint adjusted consistent with the Trip Setpoint value; Equation 2.2-1 Z +.R +-S < TA' Where:
Z = The:value from Column I of Table 3.3-4 for the affected
-channel, R = The "as-measured" valae (in percent span);of rack error forj the affected channel, 5 : Fither the "as measured" value.(in percent spar) of '.he-sensor error, or the.value from Column S (Sensor Error) of
' Table 3.3-4 for the-affected channel,'and TA = The value from Column TA (Total Allowance) of-Table 3.3-4 3
for the affected channel.
c.
With'an ESFAS instrumentation channel or interlock' inoperable, take the ACTION shown.in. Table 3.3-3.
' SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS'1 & 2 3/4 3-16 4
1