ML20097C255
| ML20097C255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1992 |
| From: | Mcgranery J DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON, SHOREHAM-WADING RIVER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NY |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| CON-#292-12957, CON-#292-12958, CON-#292-12959, CON-#292-12960 DCOM, OLA, OLA-2, OLA-3, NUDOCS 9206080164 | |
| Download: ML20097C255 (2) | |
Text
-
' ' [2. 9ff 7 coCKETNUMBER
, g 95y PROD. L UTIL FAC.&322 ~ dM. Af041-2lM.3l 4
i g ggy DOW, LOllNES & ALBERTSON g
ATTORN EYS AT L AW g;g 1256 TWENTY THIRo STREET USNC WASHINGTON. D. C. 20037 92 JLN -3 P5 :36 June 3, 1992
- *
- 7Tr43'!/3,$'7,$,
veue owc troei esnes*
DO@y- }'. l' VP.i e
i
.e. % w.
The liS[o$able Samuel J.
Chilk The Secretary of the Commission Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 at Long Island Lighting Company, (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Unit 1) Docket No. 50-322
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 55 2.701 and 2.708 (1990), I hereby submit for filing in th.a appropriate sub-dockets of the above-captioned matter an original and two (2) copies of each of the following documents on behalf of the Shoreham-Wading River Ce:itral School District (" School District") and Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energy, Inc. ("SE ")I 2
(1)
Petitioners' Consented Motion to Dismiss Their
-Joint Opposition to Issuance of Decommissioning Order Prior to Hearing (Docket No. 50-322-DCOM);
(2)
Petitioners' Consented Motion to Dismiss their Appeals (Docket No. 50-3 2 2-OLA) ;
(3)
School District Consented Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Docket No. 50-322-OLA-2);
(4)
SE Consented Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 50-2 322-OLA-2);
(5)
Petitioners' Consented Motion to Dismiss (ASLBP No. 91-622-10-OLA-3); and (6)
Petitioners' Consented Motion to Dismiss (ASLDP No. 91-660-01-DCOM)
(7)
SE Letter Withdrawing Opposition to Relief 2
Requested by LSNRC-1936 (April 16, 1992)
"i 1 Office of the Ge.neral Counsel of the Commission has R
informed
.asel for the Long Island Power Authority and undersigaod counsel for the School District and SE, that the 2
Commission wishes to review the Agreement among the Long Island
)bp) 9206080164 920603 PDR ADOCK 05000322 G
~
Tho Honorcblo Senual J. Chilk June 3, 1992 Page Two Power Authority, the County of Suffolk, the Town of Brookha.en and the Shorinem-Wading River Central School District, and the Settlement Agreement among the Long Island Power Authority, the School District and SE (effective dated June 1, 1992) in 2
connection with Commission consideration of the motions to dismiss identified above.
Please find copies of the Agreement and the Settlement Agreement attached to each motion per the Commission's request.
SE has also asked me to convoy to the Commission and 2
the Licensing Board SE 's deep regret in having to abandon its 2
principled participation in these NRC proceedings.
- However, government officials of the County of Suffolk have represented that the Long Island Power Authority ("LIPA") would withhold approximately $41 million of funds due the County, the Town of Brookhaven, and the School District on June 1, 1992 unless SE2 agreed to file all necessary papers to seek dismissal of these proceedings with prejudice.
And those officials further represented tt tt the withholding of such funds would cause the County's bond rating to be reduced to " junk bonds" and result in the equivalent of the County's bankruptcy with ensuing great harm to the residents of Suffolk County.
In these circumstances, SE 2 considered that its larger civic obligations to the general welfare of the community should take precedence over its more narrow educational energy policy objectives which are intended only to promots that general welfare.
Thus, SE$ agreed to move to dismiss these proceedings in return for LIPA s assurance in the Agreements including LIPA's assurance that it will make payments due to the County, Town and School District, at least for a limited period of time, so that those entities have some security in future budgetary planning while a final and enforceable resolution of LIPA's duties is pursued along parallel paths.
SE wishes to assure the Commission that SE Will 2
2 participate in future NRC proceedings, as it has in the past, to urge the making of decisions which SE considers beneficial to 2
the public welfare.
0
-6 msu7itted, Rg,spectfull 7
ames P. McGr: 'ery,-
r.
JPM:jmb Enclosure cc:
Service List
..