ML20097C050
| ML20097C050 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/12/1984 |
| From: | Alin P, Bares J, Baur C, Blennan M, Coughlin W, Coughlin W, Davies G, Dawson H, Dawson S, Divadeenam M, Ehler P, Falco A, Falco M, Fitzgerald J, Fusco E, Jehle H, Jehle J, Mcknight D, Mcknight T, Mclane V, Morris M, Pardo W, Podstupba A, Russo R, Santos S, Setlow J, Setlow R, Beverly Smith, Thornhill E, Wanderer P, Weisenbloom J, Wellen C, Williams E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, OPEN SHOREHAM, SAVE SUFFOLK (FORMERLY OPEN, INC.) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| OL-4, NUDOCS 8409140246 | |
| Download: ML20097C050 (62) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:WE j
. Q Q , 7/. ,U V. ll 7 %
u- f @ lffY
'm str12 r26 b ok r! 7T #'O ' \
i(; km -- n :.
%, 'tuj. . . . .
- ." .5.? ?. 9 A - Y m y % SEP B k LO, cw J :
l! D NE j Sf. , h.dbt.Af &*
.A p.s a k % A A..A 4~
l %AwGm 6.,b,1%,x A f M. #
;MY h /Y -
l, h~ % LwAfp Y
- b N
- _
a y ,n 8 a - K 77. .c.,. A h h a ~ h W /
- h Wy f h Ah. 3/M .Lu~ay f bel k h a~p.w f w
& M ~ $U*bl$k .st ALs.*
f f- .k & f .o.1%,>chof a~ y .
~
h$& Mh) h < 1 h M O 9 h W ~ R m & f M .u M dA k .4U MaM - 8409140246 040812
- PDR ADOCM 05000322 Cf . .
G PDR
I O eta na Q+ w x,AJun k an 7w - . ax. e
~
r i
!I '~
i
~ e' 9
6 i & t G e 4
- ? S912 P3:3'c
.,, a . !s.
4i coc:- r F'a' - , $.d. 3. 2.- 2,. g
. *r.;'. M g J p,
**,/ 'y// ,17yf,
/
!? , i c:P ,7,
., I A: icu b w el M P C .
<. c , ,
.- i i
Tt/ , D,.wc 43 %., . r Mc
. c to urt ,
n /2,. &- y 2< h .Am% w c % p 'a s - l; A M, _. He % Q ~ 2LL f JR p,m h a >w & - i! j.w~ J-k a~L W
%wwn As w o c
we nc
% & u d a a, L -
/
uwi_ Ml S Ma.b d- w - f'a s, t 7 a a ~ - 1 c
%w cSJuwd b A ffli La p'qm Ay (L
px, h Qbl. p -- 1. = :. n~ p --.\--. , -. . , . . , - - - - , , , , - - - - - - - - ,-+--n,- ----.a,
h h ' s aennen . . $. .'.. ..
. . , _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . .. ..y 1,u . . . . . . . ._. ..m:.: -- _ . . . m. . :. - - + - .
..._1.._... .e . - : w..
w It ' 99 E 'E &$ I
&....S
~-
4&4i
~~**~~~
O ' f n, l l Al n 41./~ A 5E555 h n
,t tw
, 44M.fw&M4
- CAs2, -
was.x nnan. e m C .. .. . . Y '
/ ammmes t ,1 ) M M
. t-muumas i j6 _ w.= M o
. EE
+ M EE
. b ge ut&4ebe.
!55!!
M
!!!n!F M
M
.w.m
- n. -
aranuaw
&&114F
- . =a 6.Menue
.h suaan.*
M assausau N&ueVe "w*1'50,31
. arm 4 & ,
adel JN 6 M assasaans M aane bdeM M/.l*JE aw M!M
* :4mstas M
4wwara
- men?.
- Am
'Neu e
. ins des 4M si.eG.aes.
n comamm 6e
- - . - - - - - ~ -
F-i t ~,-
, .s
*: e n-- . . , ..
- e. .. .
.,5, ,
9 . i J '. a f. y
',e ,
.t r i
,~,n ,%.- ? / / < > ~
~
$ f,.p , . s ~ .,f .
<? . - - --
/
1 O --; s - ,J. i
.f 4* s. m-,
t f 9 o 0 l /* *W4-**$ - *W: /J ', w . . r d[a s - 4 ,/M. - -> %, e a.-r s \, ,a % ,./ 5 g%
- 8 *
.. -.- g<
e' . a g
-. : Gn . t.. -m.e4 e .
n
/ / i a-sss W- . .
. i
. t j .<-(s e s r'- .r.u ..
s
- a
,. r, a
/-- * " ~ ~ . '..
a
........, g s
. a
. (L,.*~rss=*=*%*~&w.- .pm*
;j . ,.,
s*****
- f. .g a-a
. , 4 7 ,, K, y o r
* *'? g r, ,/[. -/h / .' . . '
vi. * * . /s . g , ,, , . a a a Yg h g.m .# " *:4 e ' e ~ ~
- w.. $s ..o m
. a t , .
=
.L~* .. o ' : *; . s o. sY.'.l . , ,d= , (,
* *.*/
s I $ v.
.4 i*.,,..,..., d*'/. rf,,,r! . ,,-
m
. /
esRApp J. DAVfES m
'R
=an Sf a
Y4' en k
e
'6 ,
e e e
.e.4 .,..,g.... g . ..m.;;, g;;ggg
...y.. . . . . .
..............,g.,."g".
~-
...g .. ..g..
=a
.. .u;a;; - - . . .gwu
. . .,aam.,,.;g . . . . , . .
. . mm. - . .
,g... . . w,uuuy . .
. . wgme. -
-..g.....,,.,..v..... .m..
,,gg.mamg . ,. . u u r .. .n g. . .
...q. .
*
- k&4%d4.~.a.u ggy . ,,
g... a wwm;u .. . .uuuu - - - - 'u.usau - ' - - ' ' 4issscma..uuu ~ sw -
. . . . . . . . . . ....aaaua.uantu ass.w.u ..
'2-'
.....u&u'v'
... ean * '
uus m uuawn" 44u 4 g
E
-..m...
aw JJ* **""
#p ,. .
'.:*a..t.:;;.;.*=..'/..,".."__*.".-
g.., . . . .
, j 9 .g.,.m g...
; i j
-.GQ t
gt
/ 9 f 4g.,..-..
...uy3;ug..
%Y
^
/tM.' eta &vsA"*
l-... .. . . . . . . _ . . . . . W a -"eem.
/
,[w g } w sna..ly,.am'as anssmususa.&&es" _ __ _';ususuaz-"
Y l J . , .
~ . -
us,;,,ss-. - ~
'Te, W 6 [ g
.**'"assan *stanatmusu
. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ..gggg g y . ,
7- . . . . - . . . - . . gg ggg, , g,g.-... l f. -.
. . . - . . . . .gg t .
j
. . .;;2 g.,;g.g.
. . . . . . . . ..-.. .. g.g. .g.gg 2a _
......y'* g
=
. . , y
, - -- -4 e W . . . . . . - . . . . . - . .
. . . u.g
. _ . . e . . . ...gggg.g f
. . . . ...yu;ng.
'T.?gw*;JJJ#Av
}' 1 f, 4m m_ % . _ . . . .
6 . - . . . . . . . - . . . . .a
. . . ..g;g, 4 . . . . . .
I CEEARD DAVIES . . - . . . . . . ll m m M m M.Y.
..uu uu 2 It?M y;;;. n;g; .
...g...
. ..;g w
sa::=::;uuuzuuusue:n" "-wsusuur-O E"..,
. . . .;,.uuga .u. m. . . . . . . . . .k
'-.- .n;g;y.~ . . . g;gg. . . . -
E.
.. .g;;;g. , . . . . . .
L
..my
.!... . . . p.gyggg
.g... .7...... ---
. . . . . . . . . '...&.*.I.:._._.
. ...g;;ggggs
. . . . , . ~ , . ..,,e~....ggg vgj o . -:;g;;;;ggs
.., . . .ygg;y. .
n... .._e
. . . . . . .g.u.. ..g
. . .myg . .,,
P2 g # yg F"
. ~ . , . . . . . . . . . .
-* :a;A' m,......... ' i.e.4.Lu:.Gu..u..si.*as.s,84e5
.. _._ggg
~ . ~ . ~
.......y.. . . . g.. .y,.gyga gg.g g.gg
.y;g, .;;;4s,uggg;
......,..u;.,
u
.- rugs.ggyp;m.,,.a.;., .. ..
-,.yuay. . ,,, , _,, ,
.-..,n ....w.,m.. g. . . . _ _ _
44 ages.gg,a. g,4,,,;;;mm. -- - w' r
; 7 y__--
---wws' - *- ' wM.4W' -_ , ,"' -
*"'"44M.4'.. . - - . . . _ , ,,
m.g.a.,',,,
> * . ~
g ,, ,ggggf. 1,.;gggggg; g.g u".h. +d - ^ -.......u.m....g* _ gg.g...
, , , _fgeagg..
. - .og . .........o..... ._.y;g m._...
.. .. ...,.g... ..g;....
mw;ugg
~.
. mmgga ma n a ra m .o.. ogasmuusgs ~ *=" "a.> ~ g:g;;; +3;3-
- asuuuugw v -
" auum" " " - " " """-
;,;,,,,gg;;ggg,,
. _a asaaneesssas-" -* * " - - - --M.44asswu.c.a.,g u a&.ta.f,-*= .. y g.._
'cauw.u..suusunmMW ' c b.g .
r-Jt:ma.,g.6W.'.;, ,_
. ___,._ g g
.. y 4.w A.u.A w ./#t.t dg.ww'.wAvsniswAwe.s.a.s.uw
_ . . - - gg2 _. ea.. i. wast s
. . . u_
'444n.ausea,assusaka 4 6L.htu.DeuNwat:Jua o % e. ;6.ia.JM .M6Euis.a&,' e.b.tusav - * * - ' "--. ' .~ .':,uT.
- .a
, '.a'an's.wnst.uuure;4se o' *'\' ~askusw.vavA
--kA*~..... -w M.*H12* E?*" ' "" * "*" ** "*"d*.611' M1S*.**:aL*1T
"""a"1.& &&tM:*tW
..!9. T!*!Ei.e. " - 4.44.5s ' ' *"C" ' ' -
'*f;.".....u.. . .-"4wahasse;uuaeantstu
. .. . ... .: ?!!e3 ;.as.43" .
""444 " '".4Aw ha&N6hs'.W..J.Na.U4 MNuau" * " ~ ' '"Jo&'EE**""*** "W4*N.T.*41*1".si".1*.I'/.7.O'1?
-rustruttu.W . .faluft - ~
*' 4*ll.*A*/.i*"
"-.'A"'--
~ -
.....................o..
4?f*?U?III'.*!*'*." ..; . m".*.*.IElliislEE1"*"" "m aliE Al3*.e'.** "***"*
Sa.,322 y g ..:.:
'81 SP 12 o'4 :-'.i
^'
55.,_. .. . zt
/f/1/h
/!& 2, % 1L..a.: d/
/.
t r,% j ,; ,. / A/Pr Asds A%, /+ /"ns b .
#n * &,/l u _. /:/E h+, bm.
A / W a // A L st s~ J ,L 2'.242 J :Af.
" w&
i
</ g J , -
, JL.A -
M # x drzco J21 -
-S4 % ~rr~/ Arm /
k . d /:b;..//u'jlad a2eo ya _4 s,b/ 9_w 4 A 7 4/~/ b A.4 1~g & dd'rWN n,J.pps.-. -a
& [ fA,,//addd'e~ &
.& 4A a =ag a .&d-.#
hd ch.JA .u Abf.u ..d,, w dZrJ,u f n a d A u X.A m/a 4/d 2mmM w .d? a.u n. , A A / re-~>
e o *e D
..o . . . . . . . ...--o
. . . . . . ...u,s- . wssasg
.y . . 27,77.. .-- . a;,sau, sgggsrurg
...g.- . . . . . . . . . . . gua_,. . . . . .g;g .,
g... . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . j,gg . . . . gsgg. . . . .gg.g;;ggg.,g.. . .. .;g;;g;;gy;g4g;;;g,_g..g. -. - .4g -
u... .. . . .. . . . . .
;;, a - u.4 a&&aaelataaa&&a&au..h A se 64.s&44 J.J."Ja .J *44Js4.44J.*4 .w;'
*:3. . . .
. . .;;u.. . . . . .
, . .,,u;;u;. ...,... saus;a;;.. - ; assay;,,y;;;;ua.. .. g;s.;.u;;x".. ..- . .
. - = - - . .
. . . . . . . , . . - ga;6224.a. - .
u.,g.csg,,u,
,u.. .. ..s,,,a . ugg;s:a4;;gs;,- '..ss;. .:;,,:a. ;,.;;;u;;u;sgsaga ;
~ ..~ - .
;ggag . . . . , . ,.g 5 4 . . . .
*?.~.'.*4*N.~.:.~*.;
.. .. .g s . . . .
4.u n
.'.'...a..a..
/ 4 .gg... . 3ggg
^
gw ss (? _#_. ,- y
..a.. *:.*.~a;;,usw , - :::.~ :w. . .
.._=,
. .m
?*-- **
2.. U. :.:.: .:.g..
.. . ..;*41.". .ya ;;y,g;;;,;;;
. .g;;;;,..
-.e..
9 -"
" ' wsaawtuatiaski
...;g,... ...
g
...y=
...gg..
.*Jt ' -"auattsumtual. ate.
. . . . . . + . . .eegg ~.
f8 , . . . . , . . . . - . ..-.. . 3 -
. . .ug;au,,
Ef df
= * *sts.
,,, ..* 448H&M4.
.. 45MMM13 e . . . . .
~
. - anas'
- b. . . . . . ...ggg..
o -,g... g.
.n.. ggy
. . .ggggg;;44
....,,,..g.,. ..g y ..ggggy,,, . r e. .ygyggg
. . . . . . . . . . . ggg.
w.-
..1 1;x% 'u.*;;N;3aN.MwvN.'::e.sur$%'.4%a 61u:6'.sGS6sssus.aust. *L:.su.stJ;tands.4dio.
n& ' ' ' * '. sued.HedUs.: .~'.'
. 4 4;,.5353643:st ;a.N;N:st'!i *;stol "4de ' 't.aa.duuuns a.ui ' 4Lus46&&a*4"daa&t......mn.
6
.&gsg4uy ;4.guttsgudig/Ji * - ' ' e" " a&&&&s ta sa443:JJ:.e2.de ' *"' ".
~44 ' '..... '
- M5ut LuinsstiM '
i 6taL3'*'
*tS *sia ba.ast:
'W.und.'wd.v X.*/Wiawauu.udstsam:15;a4. '". . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
''.~'.L
' ' 'JtMs.t " '
- lam &e.4144J.4H4.E.4.&.4.n;4. .
p=
"'as&as " * - dman.umtht.
fas4445&&&4.444&44141.4&a&JJ4444tt&MAIMi.*Jddi/J " '.ha.*.a &a&&5544&s44.6' '"l.Jd4
' %ua.uhkuC&u 6 ' ' ' &.ded*4Je Q;gg . . .
.y. . .ggu_g nl.d se .as.edd " " 4 LE4ba.a.4&&4a&&et;IS;4.44.J.ek A *Jbde/442.W4.%%'4.* !
. . . . . . . . .- = ;gg - ' < asA..g g ,n - .44st e t, 1;;;;.;
" atsnue&1&&&a*.*.ag " "*44e&gsu4ngs&3&&*.;a;' ' ' ' ap.M&46.' ' *. d.&i 3 4e6 41&""
dd. VIM.da .8dM" 'MT 1414: ' 'deC d 4 ugg,gggga . 2-.
. ';giguy.gg.a.-
.a;;;,4;D;414;,.J;ng 4 / /.v
-.....e.
. g,gg. gga .
t.g-
.o mo.Ja; *
*2288.,....
. 't:sttdedittio ^ ' ' ':. eau %W.nu? * '42" m* u t e t:3424.":si;& sma.i&he44Sasuki' ' ' '.MdisanNI.tJ. '
. . ~ -.
'ai;tstSit:a..t ...t
..e..... . . > . . .
' ' aw - '%.*
'"Jwa%44E4ti.J4 - ~ *44.JMad& desaM;&4a: ' 6 ..md.
944.HJJJJ44J4J4 " . . . .. ' t . an g. ; ; ,:.;;14:4;3/4s3.
"424.
.. ...pggggn;ggrag r - .rn-- n ssassgu - .::ggessyssagg , . . 4,;;;gg; -
- . . - . . ='. - -
-. . .a,;;;g - - ; t,\ sgg:w.ga ga..* :,3;,;, g, g ,syg,y.33,
.ug ..
u....., . . . . ,, kweend.us.uMC datu * * 'u
- n * ' n '"~ ** *4estMiadi ' ' ' ~%'.sdida 6; da.d G ' ' ' *244214.u...44.6 * ' *u;g t,.L;; bas
..;........l.:.............. .. :::"
.:.W ...g.musag,;;,ug..sys;.764;assus 4 a ~. .. . . . . .. ... .. .- -. .-. .. .~.. -. . .-. .. ~
..~
,;.s" ag.'u;,,,gsaaeugasusua . . . - y;uu--.u. . ,u nugu.gga, g.a smasanum . . . . . . . ..u;;;; . . ;g,.;g;uus.;yss.;;;z -- . .r.;g
- .*! . .................;.....* . . . . . . . ...~.
' ' ' ' ' - .-~..n.--...
Am.'i.........
.4w 's -- #.44eges #4sss4ussaats4444.U;&.44;saa. esp.. * . .ut.. . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . - . . . #. . N4
. . . . . . - . . =44444 W ~4.t d ' '. . ~ . . ' ...~.~-e=~..**~==~'.-**~WMmNtuh444at
'.A"^" '~ . ~* .'. ' %mu.at.1: . . + . ..um
- .'::L*.7l.Va..'.................... e6545ssua6uS%4d.do 444............~.....................'JJ."JJ.
.........'.au.misa.eMe . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . ,
~&suna.n:;;;i4.4.,
l
.'."l v snsa,ws cs.msessensasssuss..au.usussucunaseseasesusuassnussssenn
^ ^--^ nux au.4;.:t..:enwasaezas sa
. .d -. . ~ ~ . . . ~ . . . . . . - . ~ . -
- 3.~.uut* ' ' ' ' ' ' '
e.
-- .6Latssessua;6;;;44 e;.::.w.asu
w . 56-322 o L - Y
. i. .
!! E :2 % ._
j g --^ ..... ... . .. .. , . . . yn
. .tqq : < . /-
}sw h. sabg, e'
l La a w tA w c du 'diswefL d Ah%ia ,scye-A 6 w n-
, &, sin hid$lw ' cWO $Lb 'u -
l i i
/
sazim. 4Jelaee .2,we &&./ ass &/
,/
<. a f J u 1 w i t e. l . s , t A c . s c s > c t 6-r
&)
Amtfcuy. b ,(& n g w , t A v A lit.' c ice & dicLu.c fu. l4:~.cA ..<nu 46-.cc y
, 1 ,Y f p
W g?fl, = ,, fr-f $ $$ A.L h-Q Y' ** ,
/ , ."f
~
l/$*.Lc/ h.u.b./ ti.>.wi. hyb .b.,u ')b.c !.*-)v. : L
%zav. r<.' c i
~
fa e e e g i se. . 3.2. 2. . .o. 4 - Y ,4 '* ~l: r *tm' e' e
- 2 N /
.ii :. l.: 9 2- ca.: ,i.r :1 . > m c . , ,~ 7t 4.... .. -
..f .- ..- -
. p i,. ., . , ,
! ; ~ * ~ ~!**
U %' f * * .'s , b . ,,,,,A +* Ar% i %- f
* / g,,
[ '*" -*
/'
{ G.f/ t;'s,4 t' e'a /0 V'L .G f_[ [ y,f [
'l
- V hf 4:' c /t .?c/y enje: eve,/s/ j.a c~ n y e of T b aa rc43./
{ ^~
<mx em. / <a.e Ae/ cdM o
i "f d c l// w and % A lt c u CL/ he g C,p l/ f* ct,, -r- d OhhA/u,<c)e17 lX i
# A ' ~ "' '
cred 4y p ,/, tie <, - t .i G Ax h%. L~ y
/?.'r sit ca. - enc &. ~77 < ,. / ~
- e a ~ is e f/*- c/iee.jy o , A ,:.c h / ,
aTYcrf /= > :< d'.L7
~'
i .b* be cx y cy i/ent.t Z' xeyw .,f ' fi, <./ y
- .,,, n ,
-/'$e p/ap/- /f,a /: e i j e t ,:,. ! /*.en .3 l *~
/ /
- s. ,s **) a s ,,
* ' ' f. s ,
- l$ f.' tl' - !) a. .'.* *h
/v * <, .,- c r. . o . / . n-
GRAWGMG J 9. WILUAMS ' ~~ f 79~ d-L-= G GAIL WILLIAMS 9 h N Y ii7:3 g si: 12 ? ? :D n -, :,,,a .i. - August 1,1984
- w. . c.
' 50.3N 9- ,
To the Secretary of the Nuciaar Regulatory Co=:nission: (Attention: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board) S:.i . e. m _ ,,a
., Sirs:
re: low power testing hearings " This is to affirm that, as a resident of Suffolk County, m I am in unreserved favor of the opening and full operation ~ of the Shoreham nuclear power plant.
, Sincerely, t
b \ + r - s s(x, A
\/. e .
1[ E. Gail Williams 6
.S~6 . . 3. . c'). D. . 0. l~ ~ Y
..4 s
I - g-4,cmeaae- e: c.a. .,+-m i samuwespesaspelmsusessoust. W.'seMelin.:
* .= w 4 --sMi%.m.is.i..R< -- .w .M.MF;[.,su+.*M..,%si.*mk is . , a..,..
r :M.=ss.:
- , . .a;;.;.; ~ .
?..Efd4,~ . ,.c2* e: Masi.. ;..s.:.a~. ._.. .- ...
.- M NMYM*.3,M=Nk,. . N((4'.Dh. .Ms # p.. .
. 5.*a",. .E ? O-1
.ae m u.ea. 4 c ,e w . u -.
- ~
n+.sw. .+ne.s.w osu-raw.s=,n:.c,w:.:,w.a 7 g m.'.':w 2 c:.s ayS,.u .
..> vAsfa . : 1 m. +. ->
- -I .
- G -t N*w P**J: " .. V.' :~.* xM 8.
h.w->w.'t.?. M,w.s.kr.*:w:wcnn*1:r.:M'
.@. . M, .s.?i.'.f.'$4.. . 4Ud.. ? M.'.98.*.8K.
~:n.~.-: W.
wm.u%.n.w~- .'W2 Y. .:J+.ES. v . .. :c.a .
.. '.'d~. . . . p.%
;. . . , ;.. .u . . ;. yin . . .,, .,:.. ;. . . .,., y . . ~. .
. . .. . ,:.?. y' . 2+ '-4 . .
l
- w. y ~ww. w :-_ - _ . .. .,,,,,,
, . . x
. . . . .. ., . . + + . . ., . . . , .. . . . .. ,
..;;. w ,.,. . . . . ...3 w.
F.c.$%.,u'~
%y ,
td 3.sm. Min 8-wM$b .*.sHi Mbb , ..e. w%M:w.w 4
~_. - 2O.-
s .s ; m ~,:. - * :.$.c.4. :::&- ~&.~.: c. :Wh w ;. s -
. ' -- ur . . . , .- , . .~-. , .
t
~p.u
- h. -
- o .- m-@+ ~ : 1 '"h. =.r. .'.n.;..:..s '. -*-=n x.w a t=""*?%%%'.4MMWiMC'F.s:
, s. w,e: .s. a .4. N,..W .--SM ' "3'u, SE' 2' 'A' " F,19'30n'.'.r;. . . . ~ ,
wm ^ v> w : m .m. w
. .Mh
- e.s: e Lf.,c &p.m;ek i
, g.
waw,m,e. kT' ys ! -i
,l s -1, ..# ; *A I~ ~
~
.h 'k-s
' ' a -
1 Mw:*y%'sg: AA.G.kM'.gy) 9 g,a.
.St$..
.. d ' &< A- ..' %.,%,. ..;s~ ~ . ..%. . , ,W .
n n*' ;y r- *' 41a. M.M ~ av D t
= ';.~**.
4.I; . %p^=n's i. .~ 14.p's. .. i.t ' s.*y m.i,Q.?.9'.ate...:
*8f7 ..
- d8
>+ ..,. J.#$c
. ^j
^ . . .^ .. .
^
_,,;- .__.v
$ .. %s .4 ,
-. * * *#.%Je erwN 9
.R' Y f f*] ? * * *****
.:i,rP'MiT E :~s..... I.. . ..
..... T,.yd2. . . . . . . .. -. ~ ?s .
l fyi.L*G?.
- .-A. "ll;i~3*fXT ?9:Q'.;*d'3.?lss
~~ ~NQs W
,i
.u,p
,h".C e c- .3}.u:Ur a."v"@c"4f
" Qg.q a.R h n.*i ,.?f.$
+y .. . ~ .
.v*).'*:f .e nc ysmajLf.
jWp & n. . r^:l. % _,a.w/
.e 'j '. 4 * *V 7s3r .A.
r* t * .:.o...,;l..
. . :.e w.:,~t:r Sah. ".gs ,
- f. 4.
suly^ - s l s. w+.4%e.RCM.-A.,v.f.:;? 4 e . h .:y/.78 3h})
' " fQ ' ~ l w ?y,l.r 7 $. kph.k.~.~f.kh. w
***q.ht:.
e"' n g g._y . w .'. u h:rQ 1
- y. -
W $9&y?&s.kctnbhxW:m. j l N G $ ihl'k'O.N @%' M M.': D Ed '":Mt d9 d*.y:$5hd' " l l l I 1 i
; s .
s -
?A e.u t ') on.;
/
j ' 379 Broadway 1 . S. . o. . . .3.. 2 2. . . o. . f. - p P et Jefferson Station, q . NY 11776 August 1,19%
,. ,. 5 ';'. . . . . * -
*2
~'
To the Secretary of the Nuclear j Regulatory Consission
+,
Attention: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board -- 4 Dear Sirt
;. re low power testing hearings '+' '- ,d >f ' This is to affirm that, as a resident of Suffolk County, I an unreservedly in favor of the opening and i full operation of the Shoreham nuclear power plant.
b 5 -k. Y W ? " 9 hithE.Thornhill e 1 I r
p p-- 2 s .,sc 1 s g h. , e i
- 3 Qj
*? , *, j. I s s
' " ~
%.322. . . 9.< - y in . . . . , ,
. <j 1
, %, "1.1 sh j ') p it b
s. (-* ,t p
, ,- 3Rii.C.:.
l8 . . f/ .
.c..,
y, ,-1, , ,, w-...-s ..s
- f, * -y'
*l* ' , y { ._
.,, . . ~
(
. .:f , s u
.,p m ';
)" ~~' ' '
i*
,4- , ,. i .
p ,# a. .
~
Ad a. a
/
o e4 , > s+ ,. 3 y + h6 b ca G S.- }'%,,1c,'u b, ^-~'g
, j4 6 ,
W / V' '
"l. )< ,
_c u, , ( g^ - (fl -
... d,' . .f,yfQ:
.y.
AN ) ' c]c..g ,)' % 28f '
;x-s y f1,.c f}eJsv. - ti .
i p+3 s d.,a.;/tew4c-Q9{z4-" 9,'" o, e
-y a 6a. owe e"V"
.o . . . c,- u y.
c tb p,9 ~ c-s. ,r wue g ( -
.- n .- .
s s5 v/,
" (! /
*< gA '"*
v
'.s.-
.s
,) g.wd d
I*
.s *. _,~ /<- A c,C/ C'~) /1
( f '? *.' e
,"**t
...~.-t s.
=
{_-/o / p .' -
..v"a ' pa ""
. y'[.,b #- I
'~ - --
L, I, ) . ,. .
- %' /,,.,
;i{I
( s!., v .4 C '* 6 i , t, f.< s
)j s sq/ /_c.,
8 s.%
' (
) *n ' ! ! , 9, ..,I n, y,, ',' i '2. 4 '-r_ ! '.~ '
7 i P
\
s. Q.. ' l. _f~. y,-j *
,: . , ',, ( T~
- L t
g T. 3
.'_'% J' ,d s
,/
,,[ & f
-U I
-u '
-Y$ ,., .- - _ - _ - _ - - - - - - .
s .
. . :.e. .
~ 9. . 3. . 2.1. .( < "C
'4} pn Vd p oqgjC Ticonderoga Ct.
Ridge, N. Y. 11961 August 3, 1984 t.- Secretary of the NRC Attn. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
-.I'
Dear Sirs:
er, "f~ c . . I am writing this letter in support of the opening of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. I believe, very strongly, that enormous amounts.of taxpayers money has been wasted on an issue that has now become purely political. -- I believe that the power station is a safe generating station, that the nuclear power industry has an excellent safety record and that we - 11 have more to lose by continuing these hearings and postponing the licensing. . I also believe that the development of an adequate.. evacuation plan is feasible and that I as a local citizen will do what I can to enable ~ any evacuation to proceed in an orderly and expedient manner. t-Therefore, I urge you toapprove the request for a low power operating license and to allow the Shoreham Nuclear Pcwer Station to begin 1 operation. 4 Cordially, . p
- f . .. . '.,
Dr. Melvyn Morris bi Q - s L - I
- , - , , --,,-,.,-,.-n,.,- , -- . .. ,,- ,,, , - . . . , . - - - - - - . - - - - . - . - - - - - - - . . ... , -
s .
- ~-
58 322 oz-y y, En o c :??
/ : .. ..,... . . ~
a'<.u;CP
/VN3a.. L aL bl ha-ubM h.L) i!Ha
'r .19. .;
%j . . , ,i ,
;% s u u ,
fhEs . , _ _ 19A.' .uk.fg78SQ$~2 Y tep.u- w u d i! b g ' Lp. o .+ yy # f .#, &_. w
~^ ~~ '
; @ w n is o'nh a.- .c i.ww .
& p uM l 'I A-gsn2~L
^- .y /
J
//
- 2d /
e-
's .
Luu.i:,in ~'-J. : '**
?'" -
.$.b -6.. .2. 2. . O. L ~ Y
, '94 F017 P3:35 3 Liv .<.'i - R W ..; .
'I : ,c c -
,/ >
y.. . . . -.--- . . . _ . . ... y..,, ,
~
.. ! l I C&HL .* Lg.y./p f / % (.
i& J Ex w % ~ A w d - w t. i % ,... - i ,,,.,..-- T u a , y a t bI',;.. b4si G / ll., . h.4 CL <Wbu/ c.d abuhn. i a e-A a.zw,4faa a,ss.- ce .-w...- -. k ..
!i.
-.fALA &nAexuaA cyx. A.E/ - . . . . -
-]
Olu. e w ,J. w l Q .- -- g,p a
' . .s nn ~
x
;, a$np. a A -. M z / L 4 M A . p / ,e y G e p/ p ,.e A u s .
p&. a l % AL adedsg-.. m , x -. c- an,s.p .+J ca .aa n.u , ,/
\. Enymq... 7 ..._.
. . . . .. .. .. - _ .. . m ,. _
op 4 .e .....s _ =-%.,_ . .. gp/ g i n e-aaw l Oczbe , h'f //7f6 i I 4 N% /
3 . l
~
so.s.n o3-n .. ~ > . . ~
. . _ . ~ , . . .
fQTt*tffQQ
~
. -. . .c I
- ,e ,,, July 31, 1984 a S.,., - .c c :. .
t
-} j i, s.... . - -
F Secretary of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Re: Shoreham Low Power Licensing I wish to express my strong support for the licensing of low power for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. {
. I live in Miller Place but am convinced that the plant poses no hazard to the inhabitants of the immediate area. It is in the best interests of both Long Island and LILCO that the 4
IH plant can begin producing electricity as soon as possible. I furthermore urge you to resist the pressures from the various groups and individuals, who have joined in an unprecedented attempt to block the completion and operation of this power plant and who refuse to look at the energy situation in a wider perspective. Nuclear-generated electicity must belong to the future of Long Island, New York State, the United States as well as the rest of the world. This country, a leading industrial nation, cannot turn its back on a source of energy, which has shown itself to be far safer, both for individuals and the environment, than any other.. e
. nce rs ',
/ q -1%'g ,
Per A[in
' 8
/ .,
Box 468, Miller Place, NY 11764
,, e-,---- yy,,wyy +g--.y- e y-'vr -->m-a gr v e %---w-w e--
4 f .
- ,4 C *9 O1 7~ C
' '~
so-Jp2 2. 4 4 - M
.. ........a . . .
.j y 3.:;.9 --
i
'l i
TO: SECRETARY OF THE NU' CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATTENTION: ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
, RE: LOW POWER LICENSE FOR SHOREHAM --- -
e
-'. ! For the past 24 years I have earned my living on eastern JI Long Island. A portion of that time was spent at-the. -:.
. Brookhaven National Laboratory. I now have my own:busi- .- . :
ness within 8 miles of the Shoreham Nuclear Plant. I am .. .::. confident that the plant can operata safely if the-local -- - --- :._-- communities cooperate with the licensing authoritys .I...: :::::- : i t hereby state that I an in favor of granting a low power- . I license to the Shoreham Nuclear Plant and I urge.you to do i just that! . l !hnh W 4 1 William M. Coughlin (. 39 Highland Down
- i. Shoreham, N. Y. 11786 l
t . 1 t l' 1 o
~
g 3 22 9L-4 v, e-.. . ,
. s :- . y . . ,, --
e . c August 2, 19c4 .: ;; t,,c ' - 1.uclear aerule. cry wcn.issir. cecratary
~ Atomic cefety. ?nd Licensinc 2 card _,
- - . . . _ _ . . . .i
.uear cir, c.a ;.rici ;;, ues . . . .u.c - :: , s, c: c ;.; . iiu
- ithin 0::c tiles cf the a?.crd an ..uclear cYer .lau ,
'I ar. not afraid of it opening. .- To cy knowlese the possibility of an accident requiring any~ evacuation off site is less then the posribility
/ of.a ceteor cutting a swath through Long Island. Probabilities N that are that low do not concern me. I am much more concerned with the 24 increased death
. rate of people living near coal fired plants. For I.uclear Power Plants it is only .004%. I am very concerned n that if this completed nuclear power plant is not aIowed to open. I will be subjected to the increased death rate associated with living in the vicinity of a coal fired plant.
. In any event as there is not even the possibility of an~ evacuation being n eded while low power testing is being conducted I can see no reason for denying LILCO a license for low power testing.
?
Sincerely,
. , 5 c . %.
P.rs. Jack .leisenbloca
m ,
- l
- i. -: -
}
L 50-3 2.2 Q L Y -
- ecu ..ei enti .r ~:*
- c. ., ,- ? P 3 :3 7 6 ::c r r e n s'r i n 2.orehe=, ... .. ..;..
- u. . . . .
i August'2, 1984 ' '" T-
- t
!.uclear P.egulatory Corr:ission decretary '._ . ~~' " , , .,
Attention - atomic dafety and iicensing Scard ' -II
- atr air.
_ ^The thcusht of not e.11owing the dherehan .uclerr rover lle.nt to open 9.t this st?.; e er its c :r:tructi:-
. (being completed but not tested), sho.:s ver; . lit:ic sense. 'ne reesons that I heer for net o;eni g it
; are weak and naive.
- l. 1:.
ip dincerely,
-b p 1 .
[, . .-' ' ' , . s,% s,
., * . T '\
of p,
'~
Hr. Jack Weisenbloon 1 a P.S.- I live within two niles of the Shorehan Euclear Power Plant, d.f .
+
t n b
? $,
e t . -
;f t
- e 4
-v 0 4
)
e
-v^-** ~
v v , -,,, ,,.,--n .
e' . t . I SETLOW 57 VALENTINE ROAD SHOREHAM , LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11788 k ~ i ;' P _7 . .07 Aunst 2, Ica
- fo- $2 2 CL . <. ;; . u-1 ,; - iecretary of the 'iuclear Regulatory Co= mission !
Attention: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
~
J--
Dear Sirs:
'le are C193e n91ghDor3 of the 3hCr3h3r nn0192r .00'0r plant. We fesl that the dangers of opening the plant are nerlirible, and that opening the plant would benefit Iong Island. Thus we urge that lov level testing of the Shorehan plant be per=itted at this time.
j,j Sincerely yours, i? .
$() , 5
- !- .4 4 ;T~
1l Richard 3. Setlow r i-e .- ,,
; ,fd.w K 'y& J Jane K. Setlow
( +. i
~
5 ~0 . 3.2.,2,, d. L ' M
. : u --- ,
~
c-- e.)2LJ-l % a (n:sQy
)i.:.ct.c.,,./.a.n J..w.a ,. .
I s
?4 S7.? 12 p3:3y ,. ;
~. ~
! <<.~, ,.u
,. - -y -
** j
*"."es-* =6'
. . ..C h etf. .J .
/J V
. ,s '
7'**'Dll.d D i & N,i/ s i3 T3134
# - iRMCh SEih.. ;., , cv g- ,3 p ,w
?)w w L C U n t'<. Q l E c. x /
s
//
0 sh:. w $ I . h{ . li;. P -
, A.
/ M4 8AA.
g 4 h ~
'"--r. .
.*I 8'
w 'mm
;. 1 N .
s . . , . _~ ' L : e} Q f . [. 2 9 *. . g . ) , i , a ,.
., s 0 j>[.,e l
.h w;p i
*L -
a e w 4:
~ ~
4 . ~ j 6 c . ,;~ 's -
+
t lt t r*
+
.= d 4
- j ;
s h .,,,,M. , f J - i ' i
'( (. (,,,4+
ff L;u.-
/
s e t
i e . 1 ALPHCNSE PAUL FALCO. M. D. sa:AncLarr moAo f. 0 - OOK M) A SMORENAM. NEW YORK f f 788 7tLaPMon 744-2773 {. ,
..n,>...
,q , 3, jyy -
4<e~tm,^).n.a. 1%: AM~ '~ A4 wag Ag %
$ hk J m u SW
& % % e- % q w
; 4w~ ek. t ~ am w 4u m&- .
w p% % sp ,wk.
^ ^
w s' w u m t~' J u u fp N N fW kh% oLL% fL M M % b q~
/ edL n j .
4 .s-W (f . % ' s 5 M;/ NEafw
by cf . M -- ..--- fiq E hi: . i NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE FOR 'o * (m to o ? :s ( JOBS AND ENERGY INCEPENDENCE 3 Suite 2507 One Huntington Quadrangle . Melville. New York 11747 ("1d) 293 5112
, Caminnen 5 Peter J. Brennen Esecudve Director or. Thomme J. wm I'~ .k. .# } & ** Y C
g C T.'.
- c. . i y* ,DV tu, g w r>
' 1 TO: JEl MEMBERSHIP FROM: PETER J. BRENNAN DATE: JULY 19, 1984 y . ._ _..SU8 JECT: "ENERGlZE NEW YORK RALLY"
'l
~l t
.i I have enclosed a reprint from the Niagara Mohawk News which highlights our May 2nd " Energize New York Day." Rally at the State Capitol.
Aptly titled " Nuclear Solidarity," the article describes the broad based citizen support for-Nine Mile Two, Shoreham and the Practsville Hydroelectric.. Plant. As you well know, JEI and the New York State Building and Construction
, Trades Council (AFL-CIO) co-sponsored this highly successful rally which clearly demonstrated that our constituents demand a rational energy policy for the Empire State. We shall continue send ing th is message to our elected officials to make certain New York has a secure energy future.
I hope you enjoy this memento and I wish you a very enjoyable summer. Best'regards. 4 l PJB:baq 9@ Capaal Office 74 Slam Strew . Suae 906 . Albany, N. Y.12207 )
gay (k@h ,4. l m -
"a ' NIAGARA MOHAWK p % ? $. [.(y A
b Q ' o [M!Ei, e === e c .. : J,. M = c 2.r ,. ea w. h.
' N- -C-h=-?@45I
--- u.
~
E M Wd }LIf.i [E_ ; , , g l . g s ~ /iw T w= . ~ ~~
-A
= I;E
=
~'
M AY 1'984 L-v u - t m ;.gkt** n . m==g c = .,= . , g - l C w is:5 '4"_- m t -1 - .
.-e==glsm l%g ,
T Rd
- w. css, ;3.== r -~
~
jgjg \p 7' . w*
,- .. . . . g~~ _e r _ ._ . 3
., m yy
, eery,iiieasi#iQQ.a s
c
Q7, ansn6hiN T 2 5 Z M 5C:E.h Pd H _ -fx:Nhms.pr5CEF&ia. Ar.G .
l
- _-=jqiL--hq& & h? Sg Q h " R2k&fQQ)y
_ m .- _ . .
, . a,-5[_'"^' ' " "R ' _1& f = f n N_
#& -w. .
e 16 acu36 gas A? h-l ;;J - V
' ^
U CA 4~ *W-~
- j'_- : ~~
i. s.y. . . TM_ Q, owen - , t OfEg i v
.e Q::?! s
%g **.
e , Ql I
+
' SUPPORTS --
SME2 m 9 4 1 """
% e4KP=M m - 2h .,
.T 9/
j t _ .v
,.s . A r ' + f .,'_,
~ i '
+
. . Q ~ - ;;Q :l /,, ,5
.Ytip" is %
m . +.g. , . Ld . ,i - I ~., t - a t
' : . g'
*.h 4
'TO 5,000 w i
gN W g"g THE FUTURE IS NUCTFAR' * . Jb6 "They came in 87 buses. They traveled in s jeeps, pickup trucks, on foot and by train. %Ts " " ;si i . . NH31 l l %%7(; ' { ) 4 *C:::7d .'W:3 "They came from Syosset and Ig h - , - 3 '30PP$
,9 g 73[ $ 'Vii' age.
1 -~
" Syracuse, Rockland and Roches-ter, Glens Falis and Greenwich
, g! ""*y
,, -y
[ IN '
<M
., "They wore hard hats and 'p' h i i tm M '
~""'
g 3%g, n.otorcycle jackets.hu3inen 3uit3 {
~ ' ~ '
p j g , y 9.<dg, g g and fedoras. And they were led by 2
# police motorcade and a marching b,,g.g9 . - - -
m i P 2 %. .: O. band down Washington Avenue- % 4 D 7j j Tfj the largest protest rally in Albany s e th days of the Vietnam War, ( h P^"'-" f: _ -
"f '" '[ ,
. , g "About 5,000 of them-utility 1 workers, electricians, carpenters,
.i[*
comtnon laborers, engirieers, %. M., scientists, pipefitters, iron- -
!'" I # workers, their wives, husbands
' IS[
r I
% l and children-Wednesday l
{ brought the highly charged issue p- of nuclear power to the steps of ville hydro plant in the Catskills. the State Capitol." ' The demonstration was or. 4
.a ! ~
king' That was the description used byAlbany Thnes-Union staff ganized by the state Building and Construction Trades Council f-u writer Sal Paolantonio in report-ing the banner. waving throng headed by Peter Brennan, former U.S. labor secretary. Included in n that gathered in Albany on Stay 2 the group were 1,600 NM work-
. to show their unified support for ers from across the System who
- continued construction of Nine either took a vacation day or a
?
5 tile 2, as well as for the opening day without pay.
, of Long Island Lighting's Shore. According to news reports, al-ham Nuclear Station, and con-
.g ~ ..
though workers said they did not a ' struction of the proposed Pratts- think the Nine Stile 2 project will g ' i.- h be cancelled. they felt it was im. k p r ",/ - i. g<% - . portant to show state leaders how they feet N;->A . k [h 2
,, . p' [/4 Jack Webb, head of the Os-
. y .
.4 wego building trades council 3 ._ y y ,,. . f . ", ' said "Nine Stile Point is going to t J~ . ,' -
Q, be built. Power means business j .. .< r.lq 4 moving back to New York and
- v , ,- . .- -
f . j that means jobs,and that's wh
- L- , we're here for."
- M - Assemblyman Angelo Orazio, a i
5 V LongIsland Democrat 2nd ! gg
~
l ' n{ ". " - chairman of the Assembly Energy Ccmmittee told the crowd "For
' A. e '-f, us to say in 1984 that we are
p -m -. 2 "'" : l 1
'TO 5,000 THE KTERE LS NUCmAR' lh~2W4:@
C: igJ L. w "They came in 87 buses. They traveled in c-:' .jg-SM. :: jeeps, pickup trucks, on foot and by train. .
,g" *vg d Agr.
gQ3M/..:' ?
'?
'e
, W' .a 'iN "They carne frorn Syosset and '
*Q Ig Eli.A,. iS&PSTgI $ %'% Syracuse, Rockland and Roches- , <, 4 /
*GsM: Sg a. - ter, Glens Falls and Greenwich "- 1 Ml 1 a-
, "'Ih
@gi motorcycle jackets, business suits wore hard hats and h yer';i
**' * ~
. C g*
, g p(g%p and fedoras. And they were led by a , ,,.
4; g'% . police motorcade ar.d a marching .
-g O -
.. . D'"j band down thelargestWashington protest rally in Avenue- Albany M'N 3
s a"' since the days of the Vietnam War, police said.
,,a ; "About 5,000 of them-utility ,
* + --
... workers, electricians, carpenters. . .
%v
;- cornmon laborers, engineers, 'd$. . i['
g .s ;, scientists, pipefitters, iron. g'~' g e *- _ , 3 # workers, their wives, husbands t . u m. ; and children-Wednesday I# ~ MDbq i d brought the highly charged issue i4 35 of nuclear power to the steps of ville hydro plant in the Catskills. the State Capitol" The demonstration was or. That was the description used ganized by the state Building and wT _ k50;t_ byAlbany Times. Union staff Construction Trades Council L headed by Peter Brennan, former
,y g4 '6J$ writer ing theSal Paolantoniothrong banner-waving in report. U.S. labor secretary. Included in y , Tr> 4n that gathered in Albany on May 2 the group were 1,600 NM work.
-3 /
_1 l ' s[ o, to show their unifiedsupport for ers from across the System who
- % continued construction of Nine either took a vacation day or a
-' s 3 3 ' y~ Mile 2, as well as for the opening day without pay.
l *"N ,, of Long Island Lighting's Shore. According to news reports,21 l .b ' J ham Nuclear Station, and con. though workers said they did not l I , , struction of the proposed Pratts- think the Nine Mile 2 project will i 8 y-g .- y be cance!!ed, they felt it was im-W ;a portant to show state leaders
. . . 6 F" how they feet i f 6I A
, E ,, . Jack Webb, head of the Os.
,. wego building trades council f
y __
-W l
"- I
$,F M" .
i said "Nine Mlle Point is going to l =--- -' be built. Power means business b[{s'T@
~
i r ,d'", moving back to New York and gg gA jCr that means jobs, and that's what we're here for."
, Assemblyman Angelo Orazio, a l
e s ', Long Island Democrat and (. , ? -
, chairman of the Assembly Energy
'!* 'I y -
Committee told the crowd "For
- La B .*., f. , us to say in 1984 that we are
= E~E n- ni49 a .= ...M='R/"%-5 ow@PC4892SF4351;EaseM6fHe3HEEb.mq= .. ~0V?:=sar u -9W~ a G23WM' p ~
_ n4A+.m=4%m%Qw
~
--WMd G - - -- e
- g. g..____
3;_g-C.~.!
?' Qq-"t " f ~ ,a %~ M G h d . %QQg&
i tbut aa . % W Q yp.s . M& f ,+. W a G W 4%
'P~Nr tt t LB.E.W. ,h. h YE ,
,g, -
_ M)g ~g.,g~., .y-
% q. .. g eQ. g, 3 .
1 W.h ;&r wy
- he;yJ :,.:a5mw f c- cwc:.a ,1m.w..:.s
., Chy q.(0:t::rwf,h,eG:.,:d. a. .s. __.w , . . . -c.-r tie a-. 3. . .. . .9
=- ---
.~ .---- .4 ~5 - - -
. c.a9h,e%=fe.7W_ . y. ., a mrv g U.. g .,g.,r e.o H.t, H.'.::, w.
, % .>rf m - . - . _ . . .
. . _ac. _ , .
a ; . . g- Q, ( k 4n gw
- L - k< enyma&. L.. gZ 2%$Gg %-R @ymu m - +@@s f
.'. s $ E
.N "WY . Wh? Ym. S E O ~ Y $scrwN. Y. siG0s 'NUh ,
SAVE
.i.D U h . ,.
8 D{O r.:==*m ".-~WSET __I .,
.c - + , - -
,_ D5.iP WJ 5
s , - w :q
)
going to walk away from nuclear power . . is a formula for y
\
disaster." C l J - A number ofother speakers [ f bj , N, supported the nuclear projects. including construction workers. housewivo, and labor leaders. _ [Q gH '., pl --
'g,._'_g
- . Ln -g In a footaote to the rally,less M. b ""? r<w e
-d'"
. Yi" *
- UNbY[. ,I ,
than a week after the 31ay 2 2m - demonstration. Gov. 31ario f E~ad5& M -J-Cuomo issued a statement that &- ~-m Z N_i1D -~. R'MWaA
., T , b'M_Js#_"A M~g,. "7 ;'
he wants Nine Stile Point 2 com. . 3 ~ _hM
" E N [A W c.. '"Yiff A F*f, taE% _ h.lTA,"'"7, !*)d@$^-
pleted, one of the points in a series oflegislative proposals he - '
-I- ,
advanced to help state utilities - best by problems involving nu-clear power projects. .
\
The photos on these pages 'i, graphically summarize the sen-timents and solidarity of those ( -N _
~~
a . 9..,j' eit. 4 4;t--"TL ! y ,,, who attended the Albany rally.C :~~~ . . Y .- . L 4.
>- < D. --- :JM ~~ ' - .-
l
1.
. : .-h s, Sif ,31.2. . .O L- h c. ege, !
OPEN, INC. POSITION \ PAPER
,fy.; - % sf. A'ft' . . ._ __..
c-T08 . .- d=*~- ; (25;52 . d p r/.t~ ('.d c. w h d w Y d . FROM: OPEN, INC. * * ' RE: y , _p
. THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - M Toldt M W ' ; 1, DATE:
F gfg -; OPEN, ..... INC. State.of-New York. is a non-profit group registered with the A number -of and the purpose of expressing and came together and organized forresidents of Wading River communities Shoreham Nuclear supporting an opinion on the Power Plant. Our membership is open to
', anyone now havewho wishes members to join us in expressing our opinion. We from other areas of Suffolk, Nassau, and from upstate New York. from OPEN, INC. is: The opinion of ; ,?.
1i THAT.THE SHOREHAM PLANT SHOULD OPEN IF THE NUCLEAR ][ :.- REGULATORY BE OPERATED SAFELY. COMMISSION DETERMINES THAT THE PLANT CAN d four important issues.This opinion is based on a thoughtful consideration of i: as-follows: This consideration can be summarized I. POLTTICAr,- We believe that an ill conceived short sighted, and politically New York, by expedient the decision was made in Suffolk County, County Executive with regard Shoreham Power Plant. to the the effect of . preventing The rigidity of this position has had a reasonable and moderate consideration strongly believe of.thethat Shoreham question in Suffolk County. We the State and Federal government should become
- Shoreham question. actively involved in the resolution of the II. SAFETY-We.believe that the issue dangerously high emotional tone. The of safety has assumed a e the effect of preventing emotionality has had a rational and scientific consideration of the SAFETY issue. We believe unjustified fears have been aroused in a purposeful attempt that to support the ill conceived position of Suffolk County '
against the opening of the shoreham plant. g 0 3~- - - e * *w- - - - r e --,-,--c, - , -.,,w.w,..,---.-w.-. e~r,.- -- ,s-r--w-.-..,--e.----.-----w---,,.- -,m--e-,,---,.-,,,,ww--m %,we,---+ , = - , .
i l P! III. ECONOMIC-We believe that the abandonment of Shoreham will have disastrous econc=ic consequences for Suffolk County and for all of Long Island, i8 IV. SOCTAL/EMOTTONAL-il We believe that a climate of fear, anger, and anxiety has been created by the opponents of the Shoreham plant. This climate has had the effect of inhibiting the expression of rights and opinions in the public forum. The climate of f ear, anger, and anxiety has also prevented the proper consideration of a great body of scientific experience and knowledge. F
!! WE URGE YOU TO SUPPORT CUR POSITION i BY HELPING TO FACILITATE THE ADOPTION OF f AN EMERGENCY PLAN AND BY SUPPORTING THE ORDERLY l'^ -
CONTINUATION OF THE NRC LICENSING PROCESS ii
'=
i l's D 9 4 l t t i i I f C:
t . .
- l' THE CASE FOR SHOREHAM OR SHOREHAM SHOULD OPEN, IF ! - Shoreham and Wading River are two small communities on
- I SuffolkLCounty's North Shore whcse residents have been caught in the swirl of controversy which surrounds the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Some of us in these communities have come together for the purpose of attempting
,- to communicate our opinions to those people who are, or will y be involved _in making decisions about the fate of the - -
Shoreham Plant. ;
~ .g . It took a while for us to come together. We gathered j in a rather spontaneous manner. We had been witnessing a ,
j." series of events which wod1d have a huge impact on our lives and the lives of our children. We had experienced feelings of frustration, anger, and worst of all, helplessness. We had seen political posturing and political petulance. We had heard about conclusions based upon fear and anxiety factors. .We came together and decided that we were fed up . with what was happening to us. Since we came together, we have formulated an opinion on the Shoreham Plant. Our opinion is: that the shoreham Plant should onen if the Nuclear Reaulatory Ca==inaion
. dete rminen that the olant can be emerated safelv.
In the processoof formulating this opinion, we r
. _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ ..-..__ _ . ._ . _ . _ . _ __ _ __ _ .._ _ __ _ _ .. . _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ ____ _. _ .
carefully considered four important issues. These were:
- i. Political, Safety, Economic, and the Social / Emotional issues. These issues are interwoven in the complex of the Shoreham controversy. Since political decisions have been
(! made, and will continue to be made regarding the Shoreham i plant, we began with the Political issue. When a person seeks to be elected, or re-elected to 1 public office, he or she attempts to convince the voting public that he or she is the most worthy. Toward that end, ,;[ public' office seekers employ what they perceive to be the
;} _ most effective means. We believe that our County Executive, :
- f.
Mr. Cobalan, seized upon the Shoreham Nuclear Plant controversy and took a position against the plant which he felt would help him to be re-elected. We do not believe
! that he carefully considered the long term impact of his position. Although Mr. Cohalan won the election, his hoped.
for landslide did not occur. His relatively narrow margin of victory should have alerted him to the fact that his U stance against Shoreham was not as popular as he had hoped. Instead of rethinking the Shoreham question, he continued to
, plunge ahead without sufficient regard for the consequences.
4 As a result, we believe that he has been responsible for spending millions of taxpayers' dollars in an effort to justify and boir,ter his position. He has painted himself into a political corner and dragged the taxpayers of Suffolk County with him. We strongly feel that the people of
---,,%.,...--...._-._,.._._-.,,_,,_,ew , _ . . . . . . . - _ _ . , _ . , _ ~ _ . . - . . - _ ..e 3.__m...,w_ , , ,, , . . . , _ , _ , , , , , , ,,_w%.,-me,---.,_ _ w.-,-
Suffolk deserve, and should demand, a more prudent and judicious approach to this serious situation. Our sense of outrage has been heightened by the behavior of Mr. Cohalan's deputy, Mr. Jones. We did not j l elect Mr. Jones but he apparently feels that election is not a necessary condition for his wielding of power. We are thus f aced with a sorry state of affairs on the County level f of government. Any sincere attempt at meaningful discussion about the Shoreham plant on the Suffolk County level is met . with a series of patronizing quips and one-liners and , sometimes followed by the expenditure of more taxpayer dollars for the purpose of creating or sustaining more . obstacles or delays to the resolution of the Shoreham situation. Any person or group that disagrees with the 7 Cohalan position is likely to be described as a tool of a 7 LILCO. (In the 3/29/84 issue of Newsday, there is a story on page three entitled "NRC Chief Urges Speedup On "It i Shoreham." Mr. Frank Jones is quoted as follows: concerns us deeply to find the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission talking about the quote - need - to Nxpedite hearings on Shoreham. We would ask Chairman . Palladino, whose need? LILCO's or the public's?") This is l-an example of what Mr. Jones apparently thinks is a clever response. We can cite many other examples of Mr. Jones' I It is also an example flippant and irresponsible quotes. of the shoddy practice of attacking responsible people. The l L
Chairman of the NRC is in effect described as a lackey of LILCO. Mr. Cohalan has not proved to be equal to the task of political leadership. He has violated one of the best
- l traditions of the American political system - the tradition of flexibility and compromise. Fortunately for us, we do have recourse. Our ancestors anticipated the problem of political rigidity and poor leadership. They developed a multi-level system of government. Another level of
'[ government can be looked to, by the victims. It is possible to correct, or compensate for, the mistakes of lesser men. --
We can look to our State government where the spirit of
; compromise and common sense is still alive and well. -
We appeal to the Governor and our State Legislature to address the Shoreham controversy. The State level of i governaent should, and must, respond to the Shoreham question. They cannot stand by and watch the debacle at the
. County level.
i .
, The Federal Government must also be more involved in a l
judicious and prudent approach to the Shoreham question. l ,
. Shoreham is not a state's rights problem that can be ignored on the grounds that Federal involvement would be intrusive.
The Nuclear Regulatory Comission is already part of the Federal Government. Our elected officials on the Federal l- level must become actively involved in the Shoreham l question. I L _4 t 5
Our consideration of the Political issue has convinced us that an ill conceived and politically expedient decision has had the effect of preventing a reasonable and j' moderate consideration of the shoreham question in Suffolk County. Millions of dollars of taxpayers' money have been expended to support this shortsighted and ill conceived decision. One does not have to expend large sums of money to support a position based upon reason, facts, and common
; sense. Unfortunately for us, Mr. Cohalan did not take such ; a position. )) We believe that a consideration of the safety issue, the - .. - issue, and social / Emotional-issue will demonstrate that the active involvement of State ~and ' -
Federal government is both needed and appropriate. l We are all concerned about the safetv issue. Our group does not support the opening of the Shoreham plant if the Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not rule that the plant can be operated safely. We are confident that the ruling will be based upon a. thoughtful consideration of the facts. We are very concerned about those who would attempt
'e to influence the Commission ruling with rhetoric, unjustified speculations, or with arguments based on fear and anxiety. We do not believe that the adequacy of an evacuation plan is a necessary part of a deliberation on plant safety. We will first address the safety issue and then discuss the question of an evacuation plan.
The first nuclear power station in the United States opened in the late 1950's. There are over 70 nuclear power plants in the United States with operating licenses and about 300 worldwide. Our neighbors across Long Island Sound and in the rest of New England have learned that nuclear power is safe and reliable. A large percentage of the electric power in New England is generated by nuclear power. France and Japan seem determined to secure their nations' energy independence through the development of nuclear 3 power. 11
<1 Yet, Mr. Cohalan has chosen to ignore the positive -
aspects of the nuclear power record. Instead, he has concentrated on the fearful images of nuclear catastrophe -
~
l thereby creating widespread concern. Other opponents of the Shoreham plant also seek to maintain a high level of fear in the public mind. What are the consequences of a nuclear aceident? It is very important to make it clear that a power
- j. ,
plant:~ nuclear accident would not result in a Hiroshima or l Nagasaki type explosion. We believe that there are people who think that a devastating explosion is a possible result ! of a nuclear power plant accident. Responsible officials l should make it clear that this is not the case. If public [ officials do not make this clear, they'are not being honest L or responsible. F l-i The most serious consequence would be the escape of r i i
~. . . .
radiation into the surrounding area. The escape of radiation resulting from a power plant nuclear accident is justifiably perceived as potentially dangerous. For this
, reason, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission has assigned field staff to monitor the construction and operational procedures at the Shoreham facility. These "on site" people must report to the Commission. Certainly their assessments are as reliable, and expert, as the theories and charges of those who contend that safety has not been a priority in the construction of the Shoreham plant.
ti s.p Despite findings based on Nuclear Regulatory - - -
- t Commission staff assessments, opponents of Shoreham have
! constantly clamored about alleged hidden con:truction flaws t-or other defects. These allegations have been based upon word of mouth stories and rumors. Mr. Cohalan and other ,
opponents have chosen to base their concern about safety on charges which'have already been found to be. false by the 1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission. How can this be? The answer is quite simple, Mr. Cohalan and other Shoreham opponents simply dismiss any opinion which is not in agreement with w their own. Another safety related aspect is related to the question of risk. Many studies estimating the probability of a serious accident at a nuclear plant site have been made. All of these studies indicate that the likelihood of a nuclear plant accident which would result in death to d W W
People as the' result of high radiation levels is extremely low. Even the consultants hired by Suffolk County estimated this risk to be about one in a million per year. This is about the same as the risk of having a meteorite fall on us and strike us dead. We do not believe that this is the type of risk factor that should lead us to abandon an electrical generating station which could be so important to Long Island. In spite of this low risk factor, Mr. Cohalan and other Shoreham. opponents insist on absolute safety. This is
.; t 4] nonsense. Safety cannot be guaranteed in any activity that we engage in. Mr. Cohalan cannot guarantee absolute safety gp -- to himself or other people working in his office building. -
The building could collapse or be attacked by fire. All of - us-live with risks and accept them because we know that they are unlikely. If the Nuclear Regulatory Commission rules that the Shoreham plant can be operated safely, it will have t' l* determined that there.is minimal risk to any of us-living in L , Shoreham, Wading River or elsewhere.
,, , When one considers the safety of the Shoreham plant, j ,
'* it is legitimate to ask questions about what would be done to protect people who live in close proximity to the plant L f 11 there were a dangerous and life threatening nuclear accident. Provisions for protection and/or evacuation
(:- 'certainly must be considered. The question of an evacuation i plan has been perhaps the most controversial of any of the 1 l l
.g_
i l
. .. i l
l questions about the Shoreham nuclear power plant. We do not belive that it is impossible to develop an adequate evacuation plan for Shoreham. The County's
- d. approach, After Mr. Cohalan's decision to oppose the t
}. Shoreham plant, has been to declare that all Long Island would be in danger. This is not true! If a serious accident occured at Shoreham, only those people living a few miles from the plant would have to be evacuated. Others in the emergency planning zone (a ten mile radius from the
, plant) should stay in their homes with the doors and windows
,i .-
11 closed until the emergency is over. Other people on Long
' Island could go about their business. The risk falls off u u very quickly as the distance from the plant increases. The . -
main point is that we simply do not have to evacuate Long
' Island or suffolk County. -
Since opponents of the plant do not seem to be concerned with scientific data and fact, they ignore the evidence and persist in trying to convince the public that a mass evacuation would be necessary in the event of a serious accident at the Shoreham plant. They then employ the I transparent reasoning that the area's " unique geography" , makes a large scale evacuation impossible. This is nonsense! If Suffolk County was interested in seriously developing an evacuation plan based upon the erroneous contention that a large scale plan was necessary, such a 5 _g_
. . . - -- -= - -- . . .
Plan could of course be developed.
~
Such a plan would lead the. County to request the involvement of the resources of New York State and the Federal Government. , It is difficult to accept the premise that a country
.. with our technological capacity and resources could not ii t
- - develop and implement a plan which could quickly move a large number'of people a distance of ten miles. As this is being written, the television news is reporting that Governor Kane of New Jersey is calling out the National Guard to help evacuate people from areas of the Jersey shore
] .who are being threatened by a severe storm. There have been -
many instances of National Guard units being mobilized a during disasters. Obviously an adequate evacuation plan - - should include the many resources available , such as the National Guard or other reserve military units. m Sometime back a person wrote to Newsday and dese,ribed
, the British evacuation of Dunkirk in May, 1940, as an j ,
example of an evacuation which was successfully completed because those planning and executing it had the will and determination to do it. If 350,000 people could be
, a
'. evacuated by sea under heavy attack during bad weather in 1940, then it is certainly conceivable that people living
. within a ten mile radius of Shoreham could be moved, or directed to move, in a successful evacuation in 1984. The evacuees would certainly not be disciplined military units but they certainly would be able to follow a nell organized t t
, .----,.--,-n-.--,-wnn- w._w-, ,--,-.,.-n-en-,-we,w,em,,.,---,-v,wm .+m._,,---w,o,--, ,---w,vmw w,,,wwyr,---,--
- ~ , , -
s .
- q. , ,.
1 and well staffed plan. 4 In summary, the Safety issue has been distorted by Suffolk County and o$her Shoreham opponents. Facts and substantive data have been ignored and replaced by 2, N r\l questionable arguments which appeal to fear and anxiety. The next-issue to be considered is the Economic issue. There certainly are Economic consequences, and serious ones, involved in the Shoreham controversy. There has been a great deal of discussion with regard to the
- d, i~
Economic impact of the abandonment of the Shoreham nuclear ll dl Power plant. Mr. Cohalan would have us believe that the
. .c.
economic Japact would not tre very serious. Various numbers s ( '> have been bandied about, sometimes in an almost jocular __ fashion. The quipsters in. Hauppauge had been rather blase - about the issue, until quite recently. Now the residents
^
and elected officials of the entire Town of Brookhaven are
- faced with the harsh reality of a 28% loss in taxable prop-
'd erty.If the plant is abandoned, Town taxes will have to be increased 40% to make up for the tax loss. The other alternative will be drastic program cuts which means the
+k-
- loss of many jobs. All of the residen*4 of Suffolk County will soon be faced with the Lsam: -re.
. facts. Suffolk County will lose 8% of its present r e v = u e., s . Mr. Cohalan has to prepare a budget for. the next fiscal year. For a number of reasons, a large deficit sit ttion is very likely.
The_? disastrous financial plight of the Southwest Oswer t T . 1
'b l a
District is one reason. (Mr. Cohalan used the issue of the Southwest Sewer District to gain the nomination, and to subsequently run for County Executive. That political ii- decision of expediency has apparently not translated into
~
; the leadership necessary for the resolution of the Southwest
' Sewer District problem.) The fact remains that because of fiscal commitments which must be kept, the Suffolk County Government is faced with the prospect of levying a substantial tax increase on its already over-taxed citizens.
;;. The-prospect even looms of Suffolk County becoming the owner
't
']- of an abandoned nuclear plant which had previouslysgenerated - a significant amount of tax revenue. Mr. Cohalan must now . spend more of the taxpayers money to pay for the: legal costs _ ._ _ :: incurred-in the effort to obtain the withheld-tax revenue from LILCO. This issue is so serious that the State of New York has also entered the legal battle to obtain the . money. - It is-quite revealing to us that Mr. Cohalan did not antici-pate the possiblity of such a situation. After all, an effective elected official should be expected to have some sense of the long term effects of his or her positions and
. ' policies. This is not too much to ask. Suffice it to say the loss of tax revenue from the Shoreham nuclear plant will have a disastrous effect on the people of Suffolk County who are already among the most highly taxed in the nation.
The impact of the Shoreham plant in terms of electric
; rates has also been the subject of a great deal of n - - - -- __-+
discussion. The abandonment of Shoreham will result in increased costs to ratepayers in Nassau, Suffolk and part of Queens. The13aanitude of the increased costs is really the ~ I. 2nig contested issue. The bottom line is that all of [ us served by LILCO will pay more, if Shoreham is abandoned. Opponents of Shoreham have recently come up with some rather strange figures which suggest that rate increases will be less if Shoreham is abandoned. Can anyone seriously be expected to believe that LILCO could reduce rates after sustaining an investment loss of over 4 billion dollars? 1
- j. Opponents of Shoreham claim that we could substitute
" cheap hydro-electric power" from up north for the expensive LILCO . power. One should ask about the practical ,' implications of such a possibility. Apparently the supporters of the substitution of " cheap hydro-electric power" would have us believe that ,such power would be magically available when needed. Would it really be cheap?
Would the construction of transmission lines be
- automatically approved by those communities which would have
^
these lines passing through their midst? What safety
-* voltage transmission lines?
factors are involved with high Is the state of transmission line technology advanced enough to prevent significant power loss over long distance? Can anyone seriously believe that the people of upstate New York and their elected officials would support the diversion of hydro-electric power to an area which has a brand new
-1 -,--egs-w------7 .e-e
,.---p.w.ve+-. .sewee--.y ----.-ve.my, -v--my w- -ec---,-e a--w. +--w%m. w --w,w ev-.y-%m w e +v -,. e - - - -,,w - - , , , . ... -,
..,e ',
nuclear generating plant sitting idle? Mr. Cohalan and Shoreham opponents apparently believe this, but they are not in the habit of considering the facts, reason, and common 4 sense. one very real possibility is also the bankruptcy of LILCO. -Some say that this would be acceptable and even desirable. Why? The stockholders would certainly be hurt. We' would ask about the problem a family.might have if they planned their retirement in such a way that their LILCO [ stock would constitute an important source of income. We do not believe that the demographic profile of LILCO i stockholders wenld indicate uniformly great wealth. LILCO is apparently seeking sources of funds.- Should _ LILCO be " bailed out" by some public sector scheme? We do not know' the answer to that question. We do know that New York City was " bailed out." We know that the Chrysler Corporation was " bailed out." The reasoning for these " bail out" precedents involved the impact that bankruptcy would have on the local economies involved and also the impact on the national economy. 'The efficiency of management was
'e certainly not the primary consideration. Perhaps a person of the caliber of a Felix Rohatyn might be available to l
formulate and help implement a financial plan which would provide for LILCO solvency. A
- Big Mac" type of scheme might be developed.
We are not ardent admirers of LILCO. The company must 1
~ '
.t ,
t get its corporate house in order and operate on a more efficient and effective basis. We also do not believe that LILCO bankruptcy is a desirable, or productive goal at this
;, time.
l One final economic consideration involves the question 1 of national energy policy as it might relate to Shoreham. At the present time, oil is plentiful and relatively cheap. Will this situation prevail into the forseeable future? The situation in the Middle East is hardly conducive to a great sense of security about the long term availability and price
,l i
stability of oil. Shoreham should be viewed in the context 7 of national energy policy. - :
- j. What about the economic effect of Shorehan's y
9 abandonnent on human beings in the local area?_There is a i 1: real possibility that small businesses will fail, that homeowners will lose their homes, that children will be hurt. Is this supposed to be a desirable go:1 for anyone? The final issue which we wish to address is the
$1 social /rmational issue. We feel that this issue is extremely important in the context of the Shoreham nuclear
. power plant controversy.
We believe that there exists a very distorted and negative Social / Emotional climate with regard to Shoreham. We, as residents of the communities of Shoreham and Wading River are outraged by this climate. Because we have derived economic benefit from tax revenues, we have been attacked
e O and ridiculed. Other communities derive tax revenues from t large industries and commercial properties. Our- community has no such resources. We are described as " fat cats" who are reaping benefits at the expense of other residents of 3, Long~ Island. In fact, we are a largely middle class 5 g community who want the best for our children, just like everyone else. Most of us work hard, and many of our i families have both parents working. We have not been kind to Mr. Cohalan in our considerations but he has made decisions and taken positions which we feel were wrong. What did we do to hurt anyone? done If.we choose, and we have so, t'o express our views on lh - Shoreham, we are dismissed because our motivation must i
,' surely be suspect. "Oh, they are just looking out for their -
tax revenues, they can't be taken seriously." We did not
- come together for the exclusive purpose of protecting our pocketbooks. We came together because to our amazement, it appears that the Shoreham ' controversy might be resolved on the basis of er.otional factors alone. The atmosphere of fear and anxiety'is staggering. Facts and reason have taken a back seat. Ther are several examples of this in social
. and esotional terms.
i the evacuation question. The first example involves One of the factors that has had a bearing on this question 1 is the possible behavior of emergency personnel in the event of disaster. In spite of a long national history of l 1 l
- . _ . . , . . . . - . _ - . . . . . . .___-_.__.._...._...._._.,.____,.._,.___.,,_....._.._..m.__,, _..._m,_.__.-,- , , - _ _ , _ _ . . _ . ,
effective commmunity response to disaster and crisis, we are now supposed to be convinced that designated emergency l personnel would cut and run if there were a nuclear accident 7; emergency. We are to be convinced that it would be every 5 person for himself, that a howling, panic stricken mob would il be fleeing in total disarray in the event of a serious emergency situation. Is the frightening stealth of escaping radiation so mind boggling that people would be at their worst?- People are capable of giving their best, not their f worst. Is the escaping radiation more frightening than a l .,; howling hurricane, a relentless flood, a large' explosion, or
- t-being in a fox hole at Bastogne in 19447 If it is, it is because of fear of the unknown. It can't be seen, it can't
,i; be smelled. It can be measured, medications are available c: j, to make its effects less serious, it can be responded to in a crisis. : - Another example has already been mentioned. This ..- involves social divisiveness, hostility and selfishness. Proponents of the Shoreham plant are simply dismissed l because they are lackeys of LILCO, because they are
' motivated by monetary factors, because they are selfish.
+
If one lives in Shoreham and Wading River and is a proponent of the shoreham plant, one's credibility is at best dismissed, I and at worst attacked, or both. Even an internationally l renowned institution, Brookhaven National Laboratory, has l _ fallen victim to the emotional climate which exists and 5
-17_
.c .
o, 7 , which is sustained. There is a tremendous concentration of nuclear expertise and scientific knowledge at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Scientists there are known and i respected all over the world because of their expertise. In the view of Shoreham opponents, any person who works at Brookhaven National Laboratory and who is a proponent of the Shoreham plant, is dismissed as " pro nuclear." We have witnessed the incredible spectacle of technological expertise and scientific knowledge being dismissed in the Shoreham controversy. The opponents of Shoreham have .' I purposely created a climate of fear and anxiety to suit ~ their purposes. Their tactics dictate that they must try to . dimeredit anyone who opposes them.
~
They know'that i they cannot rely on facts, reason, and common sense. We will be involved in the debate from now on. We are not second class citizens who do not have the right to be heard. We will not go away and be quiet any longer. We will work hard to communicate our opinion to others. It took a while-for us to come together, but together we are. OPEN, INC. 4/10/84 .. f f (kl N 'bI g, p & H3 p lac b > l 0 , E* =l
// 7'/oL
-in-
3 . gb-3.2.2;.9J ~ Y
;- . = -r -
u .. .: . . g gLt 12 - P 3%9 20 aarvard Rd. Shoreham, N.Y. 11786 August 2, 1984
.. . 35
' r; 7. -
. Nuclear Regulatory Connaissiou
'!!' Atomic Safety and Licensing Board for the Shoreham Nuclear Reactor ,
- {t ,__.. . c- 7 ' '
Gentlemen: 2- -~~~ I regret that I am unable to appear personally at your hearing in Riverhead N.Y. on Saturday August 4 due to a prf.or engagement. I as submitting this letter instead. I am a resident of Shoreham and not a LILCO employee. I am unable 4 . to offer a techtical opinion on whether the LILCO plan for emergency
~[ power meets NRC requirements. I do wish to inform you that I, and many .
- ij other residents of Shoreham, would support the low power testing of
- jrg the Shoreham reactor if you find that it meets NRC requirements. ,_ . .-
i The power from the Shoreham reactor is needed now to help LILCO
.. seet mini == scate requirements. There has already been one brownout ;j - (voltage reduction) this suunner. If the NRC judges that the plant i; meets safety requirements, my neighbors and I are in favor of' bringing "
- i['
it on line at the earliest possible date. . u! S cerely yours, Peter Wanderer
'i f L, e
B
- t. .
T S. .o. . .3. 4.-3. P 4 - N a' _
/ W e :2 pi._ .. o.
- 'wes 959aa qc . a- (2 ,,
pui~xtn s 6.a,. ,,,,, ,,g/ trun'e - + [ 'f
.c,. .. , c . 2 -
cat-0 I e
+ +
CONGRATULATIONS! You were all great. We want to thank you for showing your support this past Tuesday night at the CPEN meeting. We were fortunate to have Dr. Catacosinos who did an outstanding job cf infor ing us.of the Shcreham power plan:
, situation.
f. CPEN needs your continued support to work for the opening of ii Shoreham. We need to educate others and to let our legislators hear our OPEN opinions. We need to reach out to our families and friends in other communities. You can help! Please call one of the foll number if you can help in any ways.7 4 -7732 during the day or 7 -876$ 'or 929'67M in the~ evening.
~
There are s'everal things that you can do to help:
- 1. Give us the names of friends or relatives who would be willing to have small discussion groups in their homes or who would be interested in joining CPEN. ,
i /
- I
- 2. We need money. Please make another contribution to the cause so that we can continue to " publicly spread the word."
- 3. Write a letter to Suffolk County Executive- Peter Cohalan express-your support for Shoreham, asking/for an evacuation plan, and opposing the. huge amounts of money the c6unty.is wasting ih +
/'
~
fighting Shoreham. Mr.~ Peter;.Cohalan. County Executive Suffolk County Offices Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 *
- 4. Write to members of the Public' Service commission (PSC). The current strategy of the antinukes is to flood them with letters opp.osing Shoreham. We have to do the same in support of Shoreham.
Chairman Paul Gioia Public Service Commission Commissioner Harold Jerry Agency Bldg. 3, Empire Stata Plaza Comm. Anne Mead Albany, N.Y. 12223 ' Comm. Richard Schuler
- 5. Attend a meeting of the various legislatures with us. We rec 11y need help on this. .
l Doing any or all of the above would te a great help! Please call and become more involved. Just 2 hours a week of your time can help open the safe nuclear power station.
. Thanks again. You were marvelous!
CPEN. Inc 7M-7732[ day) 73 -8765 (evening) 929-674 (evening)
m h ", M .h. -- pj sco t') P 3 .* April 6, 1984 - N : A special meeting of the Boar of'TNskees was convened at the Mayor's
>+ residence on Sunday April 1,1984 at 4 PM for the purpose of discussing the
- Board's position on the opening of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant.
Those present were: Mayor J. Jehle Trustees: J. Abata G. Beatty J. Be11 port T. Sc'ionti The Board met on this subject due to the potentially significant financial
-{ . impact to local taxpayers should the Plant not go on line, and its concern
_; that a 4 billion dollar resource may go unused. _ ' 4' ; After some discussion, a motion was made by Trustee Beatty and seconded by
' Trustee Abata that "The Village Board supports the opening of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station if the Plant can fully meet all safety requirements '! as set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory. Comission, and providing tht an ;! emergency preparedness plan is adopted." Motion passed unanimously..
It was the feeling of the Board that the energy and economic interests of the entire Comunity will be better served if the Plant can be effectively completed and safely operated with as little further delay as possible. In this regard the Board encourages full cooperation between the County and State governments toward developing an energency response plan. Recorded by: J. C. Jehle, Mayor L (7 /It .W. &l , h.n'. k yyy f
% dj & & Jjdya AnCO ,e fn,,a .h cp4 % >ha%=
!? n k S u. f h - f a ) J a c g.v.s a . -
!blu' .CMuv,' ?%'# ?,
, a.;; A
,/'#
'y yw&
. h _
4.
* . '/ ... .
e h
# 'm u. '[ e , 4 [ .-
.~. .
. -,4.- '/. '
- p.; p
'a
- D 7 Cl
.:- SG. ;w 1s "?
56-32.2 OL- % . . . w_ a
- f - f Y l.
j , , ,
*,'~
g w-' . *",' I' f] U 5= 4 S *yf*.*
- s
,'r *$* /
%, ,.YE }' &$ / w h
- c*
h' [ p M b , ' **s
- o s.
/ (, , , ..- .
'* # g ,* &
b
# ><* g.
= L
% Qg l & y
/ *M
,
- e
.. ' - /
/
' ~
' h j'
"")
f W & b T4 C'S'L G N' b Rd-f5 -
&/4 o
- )Y 4,h I % M ,i ? 'k & Y 4 . f (Vgci ,g ix)g ., . .
<& f$w 4
/-
/
^
J SA A$
, l'Qh .
e' e ,
'l . ~
f / *
./ /
g, g g.g w TE G / O.
/
p f.,'
> s- af j' , ** _ , ;
v
%z.C & %. .
e 9 , m O O O O 8 9 , O
r*
f }}{,OD
'*= .
*4...~,
To: Secretary of NRC - . UI SE? T ? p 3 . , Re: Shoreham Low Power Licensing 'i I would appreciate your considering my point of vieves,C'.. regarding the licensing of the Shoreham Plant. I feel the plant should be given its low power license. The people of Long Island are being caught in a.7elitieni gare. We need to have power for our homes and businesses. 111thout
,, the plant, we will continue to be energy deficient. I would like to see Lilco have the ppportunity to get the plant on line. The low license is the first step. This ;n will enable Long Island to have the appropriate feul o
l necessary for our future development without having to go
- to out side sources.
Sincerely, U Es her Fusco, Ph.D. .i 24 Hopewell Drive Stony Brook, New York 11780
SECRETARY, NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSICH 'p .: , c.3' ._ ATINI ATOMIC SAEETY LICENSING BOARD -
' f- F 3 :31 REEl SHOREHAM LOW-POWER TESTING LICENSE DATEL AUGUST 3,1984 ,, .,
H
':lc? '
h I AM IN SUPP10RI OE NUCLEAR POWER AND BELIEVE THAT THERE IS NO DANGER IN ISSUING THE LOW-POWER TESTING LICENSE k) Thkh!,,d?d."h IO SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION THAT IS READY TO G0 GN LINE A5 SGCN AS Int PCLIII*IAN5 COME IU IERn3 '.IIn I!. I AM A PHYSICIST WORXING AT BROCKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY. THERE IS NO CAUSE EOR ALARM REGARDING RADIATION DURING THE LOW-POWER TESTING OE THE SHOREHAM POWER STATION. AS A i; MATIER DE EACT I AM A RESIDENT DE SHOREHAM LIVING WITHIN
=t TWO MILES GE THE POWER STATION. ! THE SHOREHAM POWER STATION HAS BECOME A POLITICAL ISSUE I RATHER THAN A TECHNICAL PROBLEM. ! I AM IN SUFFORT OE OPENNING THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POUER STAION.
- l 4
SINCERELY, Ydi&# % M. DIVADEENAM
, 7 REYNOLDS ROAD SHOREHAM N. Y.
t f i L
.g . .a.
- e e
ir. -
'84 SE? l2 P 3 :51 60-312 03-e;.s
- 6
.:; 6 CIRCLE DRIVE, box 653 " SHOREHAM, N.Y. 11786 AUGUST 3, 1984 SECRETARY NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ..
- t. .1 ATTN:
'q" ' Im et.,_
ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING BOARD
- RE: SHOREHAM LOW-POWER TESTING LICENSE I AM A RESIDENT OF SHOREHAM, A PHYSICIST AT BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY AND ALSO A PARENT, AND 1 URGE THE BOARD TO APPROVE A
! LOW-POWER TESTING LICENSE FOR THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION.
1 1 *BELIEVE THAT NUCLEAR POWER IS THE CHEAPEST, CLEANEST, SAFEST' FORM OF NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION. THE MAJORITY OF THOSE OF US WHO LIVE WITHIN A THREE-MILE RADIUS ___ OF THE PLANT BELIEVE THAT IT CAN BE OPERATED SAFELY AND THAT IT IS ONLY POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHICH 'ARE DELAYING ITS OPERATION.
. c'
/e .t VICTORIA MCLANE e
- _ - - .,._.y-, ---.--_,_,-.,.__....-,,-.,--e,._., _- - .,,_...__,___._-,.e, - . - . . , , , , , . , , - , , - , , ,
e
- e. ys p y *...e,_. . .. . . ,.r . .
*
- n.
. r m.s .. . . - ~ 4..*,.,r.*' _ . . .r y. . e ... .
%g
; .* a .s .L..'. d.... -
. ., f- qi ehr. . y. s s ,. d 9.'",,...7.,, ~ y .~ .. . P.
.M. i.$..;*'.t IA, .dit .,.N. .'U.- ..
nonp(d.322~ x...
- L,r .
-:.\. ; :p:.;y.:p.
.~..:.i.W S. t:t.d,%.. :.3 .g,
- . n g a ............-e
.. . . ,y. - DCV2m
. < .r 5.:.,, .~ ~r . ' c;.:x- ' . a. 4-? -a. ~ ;
-. , - .. , tdMC .
w . . e, 'w :
+
.y E y C
.oh .,,, f""'
, sr . .,c- s
. s .,.= ~ 3,,.g.aw ,.y .
.a.... . . -i + - .. . . .... .
.u . eca g ,
vu - ep (. ne ,e, ,. i *b g.e-T # *.
- p a. .au..~.... .e u s e . .. As . . .w v . +. m. ,
.,.y 7 .. . m....n..~,-.,..,.m...w. .
-.....e.
s
.. - p, , m.
. , ., s. w.t 2 -de. .:
n .. c.,.... w .. ,,.n . ,..,..... a..;. . . ~ ~ w -- ~ - * - ' ~ '
,*r s.~, . . # R - r /
.- _ - - _ - . ._ _2 - -w m .~ . . . - - - -- -.
3 ., . - - . tsunesc.,e.n.sw<d
., _ , - - - _ _ _a.bW. 5ees.r .
p.mo e
* . . -e ., .w .
. s.-. .. ... .
~ ~ e .n .. .eens m . e -c:r m_
. ' werf.
n.3W+mw,,,e<,n -- ~3 . ., has,f %=r,'.a.:p$
. h . ,.~- f' (.
.~--."i' .: . a. . . . .,f..&.'
.a .* . w d . .< a e - *4 awe.,o.o.- = - ^ *~
f .? par t4 m.- 6-) .,m,,ng$,,' =.p,*?{- < * - -
* ,,**w. e. e
_. , Qe.186. 4. -w ; ...
*i A t' w ='*ss*.*%+w-t::a w es ,
.a.tn..'.e Mue'ame %- ' .. o s .
1, s.. v. n ,
*.;r
. - ' - ...=4 ' '* * ' +
4
.w
*,,,.; 6.q;4new r o.", W ** k r.%,W%te .sh *f G s (: . . 4 ,- . .,, ;; .a.c . .s<.. ea
** $ f .,*t .M F .. . s =g,,. .
- A h ' b , r . .'
df ?&,ed, '
, b.*b'*.'l *[* ' # ' * &TQ:. , . .M' %' ,
' '* . ':Qil[ ;
- n' ,' ),f* %. v'. '
s~* _
= ~ ** l ~ ~ ~:'$
fjk , ~ ' ,
' N ,o=
j* , g, _ _ e
} Q '.* -
._l
, ' . ,,' <.- .< - . - - ~.. .
o
*g.
,e.. . .
s s*.* v W *- % - * :e,. a~ = www
-4 xmNa..q .- .
9.n.r. e. p. .+,m 9 m . . % f 4~*s.dm.Lv,py;!.'ver.se .. ,f . * ".4.&see:.v:'an s c. -
., . . . . .. . .O
' < '.#.ey M. pdna @.VE- If5M.~NM:b 7 $.N.Nd.N8/'*N' ' i* 's
~
-~ '
~ ' * ;P
- b*N wn.x,:L . t% .- n~.~ v~:~ ~=v* : c:,' a:.~ r% m; n + . *r~": -f m'*.- . ' '* +.;~*~..t n wnamMs,.,* .
*~
- w.t-&.ch:W *
= vmma**ayn.m* ' . ~: - - -
m.
' ene m, . . 4me,Jn .,er,+,nsg" -
~r .a w.s. :.w am,mm+ M:",m** '.m,.**%,' p,,.,. v!**71.*,*.,**** ,,w;tr+ .u-
,,.,,,,,,y "'**ke'd
.s y ' " L*' ' ~ ,
-..*g'
,r.,. c . . 6 C
M.5" . .1.-.,."
. f.,
' f.yg
,,w , s.,y i, .. .
}\'~ gef' }l & -.c..... .f.p. >';m.'Qf , ,.. .,n.
,_ f,
.i 2 m.gp ,,r'ah*a*. p.p '
. P.y. mb,s
.ue+-9.w.#A,,/&g$).7tE*."!"
'W
,f.
M.' '-
;U h .%"*Y' J ,.Y. .
~ ' ~- e,,. .r ~.w,. .. ng v-f -
-(.p~nf~.* ;' m
- s. m.w w .p- ..
s ,y $<e :AA.& *m-O:~v
< #4; r.p. r a .
s- i
.e, 9
- gW$$ u Q:g -
- n. 'N A . A* . *
}l w.:M,[. v.&,eMM.yW.. jut."* fy L, . ".
vw. v m -isan+2m s e6 ..'.Mi
~
~ h .% & &;i k? %g iN?$jk$$. %r+ M:%'w$ 7 3%$hS MQWiWMN#cNMi?$-Q 'M
- n. .
- w ,,, ..-
se Q*. . . hs L 2 M.g w 7 m Wm. a.n..@. . ew,. .. n. a. ~m.
'sm. , r .
. n. .., .,t;fp; 4yg. g,: gu.ps
,g, .
w.e .s .. ~ww.m ni. en.s us-s -p.s.w-*p. . ~.a.: ,.
. , m ..gq. w...v ff, . %
Mene>JJ ^v , - . - @.e n6w **W.*<*
- WM
- I*a w- 1=M "
*t5ss,M t,,.W:%,p ,:9 .:.*g%.s.*2;, .hlm VtgM.e
,c.~ p '.fW e.".,' A4n:.e?*
r, ,-%..W.'.VM q- DNO:M .h.**.3.* U M t-as M e *. q,% .*. *1.r% . .',-*ze e. %W'* 4. ,. 2 u: ep_r.u.aan.;.aq' ._:x th . Aa. web b.as, su ~ y g;g.Qh.l W' q*z.g.y;% 9 Q. 4 JM'MCMp46%i"b.
. bM 'na._ a .
M .5 y :.MmmlW._s-s.p M .v%.gg% s9 j = Qygy'@, o
.f -%.eW.}'M
- .'.g qq *4t~W;m,.*.,t M
*MJen:'kar e 'M,*.
.m m.. oAqm S;m: .
.- w . ~ L,.wL; , nw. -
-Y~*T . tY . =4A=WW[=> *T
*;. ~ v 7
~ m*::.'p. :armc *.* nw;1---- z.
T*aw~~' m ?'t**'*;*h?y% t m.s 2. v . , L
,~# r.
,'r,
- - * * * * * ' * * * * ~ * * **'*-'..'.'.'.,~~.~;t -
*s m.-sg..,.p*w@r.v -v. n hyw 2.r .;~*%v':ges% . ~-,m:,r:w":",y '?M.? >+e-tv*~ ,*. '.w+a.-c;.n
.s .** *. em ~..:.. n'~ %. .
- .+
- .
- vf'""2 JiL"*:**T*J'd.:
wamart**m*43'W3-M,MM.wy"" M iq. rc+@ TSP :d'W.P **"g?%p. . -M.*.*+-S* : .' "I ** % " .4. . .'.
* ~ ' '
=. g . => s m *r-Wen .i un g .p*m " .
r i k- - :* .. .' ?. s. .a'. $ m s...
* ~
'y g '. '- g t:.:.m.
.g g g g ch t 4.
.]*
* ~
, .% . .M4:. -%G.W.-* k. Q .*u'. -w~-- M @h ,.'. %.s,. . ./f; . .'. ;U _S.:.V.. ;.M ., u a 4 s
' MMT c f. @hr.% .Y *g.<.%%wed.H s
M ,:w JN .eMd * ..h'kkp..h N 'P.5-
~
k,
~
gr.N= M' *&.mt s.W.J>ma.,,e% aeM-ow r a
.ew s,s rwh.**x a,4
' .my~c
" .a -^ en * -*= .
. s,A<de %
-s p Miram%n-s M w .w L.e~'%. 6.-<. v -~u
**p p
.* r c G L
.* m.*
s.e n ~ w 3-
.~:
~
- v.
- 3,i.*'
- e
. . : W
.*2
+
a
%,g hDY v:-n*M
/ Db, 4 s[d%,d.?* ..e. l ' **D'+W v,' . ~ .N m " 'b" .. .
,M,W.i. -
.k. x? *'.<'.?. NN*
. . J *I*- h h*%
.,m 3 C - * ? ' * * *'3' M %%* . 4. h :
- T'2,')h . . .**>.:
' . . w" * ->p.
. !am#f** ' A.;'4 .- - ..*
Qp.?,*A syT.c4*> w M ai~ n.J.br" **b. . -~ r'. * ~s$.v =.AL:ca@ro'*..**0. - e 7-d* .- ,. . M.-e..,.g,J *.* *%w.' fis."*s 9 #', h p. .* ' an s
- 1.Q,* v. .
i k b .b ' th '~~.
- .*?.
W&.'zy.-:.;,, p.v.MQF:.-wn ; 9 L w r. - .:
^
W .:..NW*%-.., hkAY?$N5= cam.fh.hik?$pr.; k bYj$ mg y yh.Y:mm'?$e': .z 4 W ^ .*W'Y. s-*t n.w,, &*.s.w%~,s,.&. .n c-=3&e%%e. ~.m:.~. ,.W%. : % '4:~w~. = . N. . ..% .w,.e p@.uw?$$s%....% 4
.*'f.p.._ %en
_4 g 2m e& :- ptgm-w . n$ w - m,A. p.s,,+w. s
..
- e n.
--.re..
.s ,
w
.v.-- W .. x *== s: wC*.
-~
. 1i h*"'dk;%,,.'n,>~~vh t
"s '
?' #
k* i N hh. n. . m . m. " k' .. j . ., .' 8, n, w.w, .A.~yhk n. : .,8 -
.co .a.,.
- m. .- v, c.=4, ? -..e %. a.-~.. c.... .r. e, y,,.
-w.er m -
~. - w.:.w. -~ m. :.
m,-
. m,...-~: . . .'-m g,% ***
- a. . +. 7. <Wsw *%g W"* *$.
r*,.s **p'J.@ f ),=. .;.)
.%:W *4 l, .f. %'<v %. r :v*..)4..:. .
- 2'?m e e** - 4'.w .a ,19V. .,c.
?.e r., k .e. gen g*.'4 g.,.
. ,.~~*:' r u
*.f .s'
- t.' * ( * - -
.. * '*-.g.6: . def[ p'.T:a.ip i k* . *
.** ""'-8%
w, ,- g%f*(*. . ,
.e- w.. - ,,.--pg,.--,.--w-, .+ ry.,. ng,.--,--%,,-y-9 p,-.pywp,-,.p9. 7g.,7,,-- _
-g g.---.__.9%n-.e.4---.-g-m-r*ywie,.+-.y yvg -.w- w----erv +
- g. . 3. . 2. 2. . .ot. - V
~
, m,,
,. m. . . t. '). c. 2 T. a..
I
% . 3
. 9
,s.
l' *
....i . ,s 6 1..(..~. , ,
.- , - '. 1
'n
.r -
t '
,, c: >- r:. -L~. _ .. a...
- m. . < _.
/ a
*i k..\ Eyo s. Cu .* ... et.A .. s ,( (,1 L' a <s
\
I Tw cw.1-t, t i
.g s e +, , u .s % d' . k i.) '. ^' ' ' *' - 's "'
t i #
- l s # f
)' l
,f
. t.43 g, r; s hb b d h v'n, 'J' A d I 'i% ~
' ' N- M' t
- M bk k g Yggh g ,e g,* . g I O*h . 4 (". . k ,% ( , , . 'A (\, g ( g g, . ,
g.
,. ) J t
.e A .A. ,
d *
.k g s)?
sr is ~.t v r.J.. vvst {. . 4J'.
.d % %t,u.
3 3 ( j -
- Ye * *e=\ # h %\ b%M
(, g' T . (eman ( g
=- e.. . ,._ w c . . M t v,.
n .. .. . b l- c. t* e . .s. d. I t< \ i ut.- t .u.
., 4ii , , .
g I. o . ..;
, t
. 4 .,.!. ' h :n. 3wc._ c. .. u,,1.. , em vi a, , 'tl. , .
,,,,,\, g, c , ,, ,, ~
. . .\ .
(,, (3 .*(, ka% **
. *:G v.o.\. h% . c a b. ._ . _c n 9 q_ . , .
\ ,
1 , .. . e c,m .-
.o .,,.,,.,1 .
L. .
,1 .
- s. ,
\ .
a
, J t 3 s\*s.\ 4%
- F '( a .. A ,5s g .* w.
, y _
,\
\ . .
. b
.e.s ..s ...v, o., c . .- c ,% .
u .J _t. ,n . t.....
..-(
?
; t %A f *g \- e
?
a . m
' ~ '
. . . . . Go.32L. . . .,.-o L. - 4
. u.s
'34 SEP 12 P3 32 August 2, 1984 klaar BeguL1ttory Ccarission 9.3.::cu
Dear Sirs,
- ., ;.. .. . . -- }
I am a resident of Wading River. I am in total agreement that the Ieng Island plant in Shoreham should be opened, even under low power. I have been y - a resident for sexteen years in Wading River. Pimaa lish to the reshu i d of the two towns idio reside r Tr===t to the facility. .i sincerely, .
;l dJ//.Z au-l Sp .< s 1 Len
> )M6 W -
s .
,o - ~ . y ,y -
4 s , g' y 7y .0
i s August 2,1984
. . . m 1 ") D --
'2 ,C?
,4 a s u.
,t
Dear Sirs,
C #-
- 09' ~ ~ --,
.. 9. . .,. .3 ....
21, . -c. 4 ) As a resident of Meding River for the past sixteen years and knowing a relaar plant was to be built I am in favor of tFm plant opening under l a power end hopefully under full in the near future. i Henry A. Dawson
._7 M re <P". 4'I244 f ~s d '1 W Rd. RR 4]
- Wading River, NY.))792
- l
.5 l e 8
1 u
. . P.O. Box 2ss
~: .
Hcuny% S9s , X.4. n 9% AuS. 2 tcts4 m p q 03g i
& So - 322 0 4 - V t
C.bh'ir-men - ok -4he. Nucloa-Te3. u.1'Comm'Mec.' h7 - 't I
'but +o c. r e o ; o u s. corne.4 men 4 r arn u.nek %
thnd +h s kedn3 but 1 woJJ hep 4'd 4R s ider u s, u b e. S e e n + k t erome c.ons,dtr'dton hs ,6 A ce re. yre.sto4 'in gemn . I eAron3 \ sw e4- & caen',n .i % re.hwrn nuc.k'<. power ykn+ hbc8 I. 4h q ce._c eq !! noe 4e 3can4 A.i Id o d. lc>w oower coerk4tn3
\;u.nse. kcn L.bd e r.s uiII'leok bhck in
- ! -u m t 'and 4dnk t oy.{ec ke'n3 h knew \tdy e
w bhrnmkr.s. s S+ 4u d o +R,s . o n h corn M & e. Wow h3-ed\ hs. I dc %4 4hc. olan4 is c u'i de. -t
% ,.a h e b h n d Len
.s o wh ollArs & n d + h e setv.et.qczne I yn4-0 h . y M uses.4e u. M o-C'ohsk.c4.I A .q s\4-0 Ard u ou o li o Ies e. k4 redsen and +he._
4&c_4 s preu'a.il e d do ns- boco +o h p r-edsu.* 4 poG4ics .iyoruner.or-hqs4e r'ik .
.%aa\n ,
0, '
.}}