ML20097B021

Amended Final Deficiency Rept,Item 88 Re Questionable Qualification of Certain Lk Comstock QC Personnel.Initially Reported on 830311.Resumes Rewritten to Provide Detailed Prior Work Experience

ML20097B021
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	08/27/1984
From:	Jens W DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
88, EF2-69701, NUDOCS 8409130468
Download: ML20097B021 (2)

Text

r-e W;yng H Jens 0 We Predart hfoar Crotabors

"~

Detroit _ . n - ..~

Newpt>rt. M @g30 481%

ISOn 0958+m August 27, 1984 EF2-69701 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen.Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Deat Mr..Keppler:

Referencet (1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 (2) Letter, D. A. Wells to J. G. Keppler, April 20, 1983, EF2-62623

Subject:

Amended Report of 10CFR50. 55(o) Item 88

" Questionable Qualification of Certain L. K. Comstock O. C. Personnel."

This letter amends Detroit Edison's final report of Item 88, "Questionablo Qualifications of Certain L. K. Comstock Company Q. C. Personnel." Item 88 was originally reported as a potential deficiency on March 11, 1983, and was documented in a final report (Reference 2) which indicated Detroit Edison does not consider this item reportable under 10CPH50.55(e).

A change in the certifications of twenty-four inspection personnel had resulted in those individuals being declared unqualified for the work they had been performing. This letter is written to clarify the number of inspections involved and the amount of reinspection performed.

Detroit Edison's Project Quality Assurance (POA) Department conducted a review of the certification files to determine if there was evidence,to substantiate the initini levels of certification. Four of the twenty-four individuals were in training and had not performed any inspections. One of the twenty-four was not certified to inspect anything and had not signed off a permanent plant document. Of the remaining nineteen, the POA review identified four individuals whose ability to meet ANSI N45.2.6 Level'1 qualification require-ments was questionable based on the available documentation.

AUG 31 084 B409130460 840027 PDR ADOCK 05000341 y --#do/

.S , , PDR

. O

e a O

Mr. James G. Keppler August 27, 1984 EF2-69701 Page 2 The L. K. Comstock Company then conducted a minimum 30%

sample reinspection of the hardware inspected by the four individuals. Their results revealed that all sampled inspections were properly conducted and documented. The remaining fifteen individuals plus the four individuals whose work was 30% sampled / inspected had 25% of their documentation checked. The L. K. Comstock Company results revealed that all sampled inspections were properly conducted and documented.

Summary of Data 4 In training, performed no inspections 1 Did not perform any inspections

, 4 Questionable qualifications - 30% reinspec-tion of hardware performed, plus 25% of documentation reviewed.

15 Qualifications complied with ANSI N45.2.6 -

25% of documentation was reviewed.

24 Total The corrective action taken was to rewrite resumes as necessary to provide greater detail in the area of prior work experience.

If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Lewis P. Dregni, (313) 506-5083.

Sincerely,

,I f

cc Mr. P. M. Byron 'I Mr. R. C. DeYoung .

Ilk s

.- N Mr. R. C. Knop

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . -