ML20096F958
| ML20096F958 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1992 |
| From: | Williams J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20096F961 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9205220088 | |
| Download: ML20096F958 (8) | |
Text
_ _.
7590-01 91111[D STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 50-269 NOTICE OF r
'10 ERAT 10N OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDBElillQ
=
FACILITY OPERATlhm CENSE. PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HA7RM
[fl{1] DERAT 10N DETERMINATION. AND CPPOR10N11Y FOR HEARitiQ The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering issuance of an amendment to facility Operating License No. DPR-52 issued to the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) for operation of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 2 located in Limestene County, Alabama.
The proposed amendment would revise Technical Specifications Table 3.2.C and Technical Specification 3.5.K/4.5.K to allow continued power operation when the Rod Block Honitor (RBM) is inoperable and the Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) is within specified limits.
Technical Specification Bases section 3.2 would also be revised to describe the basis for the proposed change.
The proposed amendment is a temporary change which will expire at the end of the current Browns Ferry Unit 2 fuel cycle.
Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Comission's regulations.
The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously 9205220088 920518 PDR ADOCK 05000260 P
(
i evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
1.
The proposed amendment does not cause a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The purpose of the Rod Block Monitor (RBM) system is to ensure that the Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) does not decrease below the fuel integrity safety limit during a rod withdrawal error event.
accomplishes this by terminating an erroneous rod withdrawal _ The RBM event whith could be in progress due to a human error.
Since the RBM is designed to intervene atter an error is already in progress, rather than to prevent the error, the probability of such an error being committed is-not affected by this amendment.
MCPR is required to be verified within the allowable range whenever reactor power is greater than or equal to l
25 percent and following any change in power level-or distribution which could cause operation on a thermal hydraulic limit. This amendment I
allows ad withdrawal operations with both RBM channels inoperable only -
when reatrictive limits for MCPR are met. Since the pro)osed amendment only changes the range of allowable values for MCPR ratier than changing the monitoring requirements, it does not increase the probability of an administrative error that could cause the MCPR to be violated. As shown by study GE-NE-770-06-0392, when the core is operated within the limits for MCPR specified in the proposed amendment, if an erroneous rod with--
drawal were to occur, the MCPR would not decrease below the allowable safety limit even without the intervention of the RBM. The higher MCPR requirements specified by the proposed amendment for operations without an operable RBM are within previously analyzed operating MCPR limits and thus are conservative for all other analyzed accidents and tran-sients as well.
For the above reasons,-this amendment will not cause a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
2.
The proposed amendment does rat create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident trom any accident previously evaluated.
The proposed amendment substitutes more restrictive administrative MCPR limits during rod withdrawals when RBM is inoperable to ensure that the automatic function of the RBM_will not be required. No single administrative error could. lead to a failure to adequately monitor MCPR and also to a rod withdrawal error, therefore a new failure mode' related to administrative requirements is.not created..The praposed amendment i
does not cause or allow any alteration to any release varrier, protec-tion system, or accident mitigation system other than the R8M as
' discussed above. The plant is not subjected to any new operating modes or environmental conditions as a result of the proposed amendment.
3.
The proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The RBH trip functions are designed to prevent local fuel damage as a result of a single rod withdrawal error.
The proposed amendment allows the substitution of administrative limits for MCPR to ensure that rod motion will not have to be halted to prevent local fuel damage for a single rod withdrawal error. As shown by GE study GE-NE-770-06-0392, a postulated single rod withdrawal error under the provisions specified under this amendment would provide protection which is not significantly less than that which would be provided by the RBM.
The MCPR requirements specified by the proposed amendment are within the allowable MCPR limits for normal plant operations therefore, analyses of events other than rod withdrawal errors are not adversely d fected.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied.
9 Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
The Comission is seeking public coments on this proposed determination. Any coments received within thirty (30) days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination. The Comission will not normally make a final determination unless it receives a request-for a hearing.
Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Rules and Directives Review Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should cite the publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER nntice. Written comments may also be delivered to Room P-223, Phillips Building, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, Bethesda,' Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. Copies of written comments received may be
.L.
4 examined at the NRC Pubile Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555. The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to intervene is discussed below.
By June 22, 1992, the licensee may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene. Requests for a hearing ar.d a petition for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CfR Part 2.
interested persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is available at the Comm'ssion's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555 anti at the local public document room located at the Athenr. Public Library, South Street, Athens, Al abama 35611.
If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and I.icensing Board, designated by the Commission or by the Chaisman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall set 6
forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding.
The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should tm permitted with particular reference to the following factors:
(1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made party to the proceeding;
4 (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify the specific aspect (s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene.
Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fiftean (15) days prior to the first p*ehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an enended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above.
Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the procending, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter.
Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted.
In addition, the petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner intends to raly in proving the contention at the hearing.
The petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware _and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion.
Petitioner must provide sufficient information-to show that a genuine dispute extrts with the applicant on a material issue of law or f act.
Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of-anendment under consideration. 'The contention must be one whi.h, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who falls to
__mm_._____
(
n file such a supplement which satisfies t,ese requirements _ with respect to at-least one contention will not be permitted to participate _as a. party.
Those per:nitted to intervene become parties to-theiproceeding, subject-to any limitations in the order granting leave to: intervene,_ and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, includinc +%
.I opportunity to present evidence and cross-examina witnesses.
4 If a hearing is requested, the Connission will make a finn!
determination on the-issue of no significant huards consideration..The final
]
determination will serve to decide when the hiraring is held.
If the final determination is thatsthe amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Counission may issue the amendment and-make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the requesti for 'a hearing., Any hearing held would take place after issuance of! the-amendment.:-
If the final deterrain~ation is; that the amendment request involverf a
[
~
significant hazards consideration, ~any hearing: held would'take place before; the issuance of any amendment.
~~
g
-Normally, the Connission will not: issue the.amendmeN until thel S
expiration _ of the-30-day notice period.- However, should? circumstances change; during the notice period s,.ch that failure to act in al timely wry;would
- i
- result, for examplo,ilnl. rating or? shutdown of" the. facility (the: Commissien o
may issua the license amendment before the expiration <ofothe 30-day notice period, provided that' its-finaldetonnination isithat; the-amendmeht in'volves -
no significant: hazards consideration. Thei final ! determination ~williconsider -
.alUp glic and State comment'st received.: 15houldLthe CommissionTtake this L action, it will publish in:the FEDERAL REGISTER a-notice of issuance and, 1
f g
i n
LL LL---.-..a..
t
. provide for opportunity for a hearing after issuance.
The Comission expects that the need to take this action wil'l occur very 5 frequently.
A request-for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must bc filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention:
Dockecing and Services Branch, 3
or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, by the above date. Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly su inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-U.N _ ' 5-6000 (in Missouri 1-(800; 342-6700).
The Western Union m 'or shou a be given Datagram Identification Number 3737 and the following message addressed to Preject Directorate 11-4:
\\
petitioner's name_and telephone number, date petiti. was mailed, plant name, and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission. Washington, DC 70555, and to General Counsel, Tennessee Valisy Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, E11 B33, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Comission, the presiding officer or 3
the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the pet on and/or o
request would be granted based upon a balancing of-the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v) and 2.714(d).
For further details with respect to this = action, 'see the application for amendment dated May 13,-1992, which is available for public inspection at
)
~k
li the Commi,sion's Public Document Room,- the Gelman Building -2120 L Street,-
NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the-local public document room located at_;
the Athens Public Library, South Street, Athens, Alabama 35611..
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of: May 1991.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY-COMMISSION-
-Joseph F. Williams,. Project Manager _.
Pro,iect Directorate 111-4 Division of. Reactor Projects
.I/II.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~
\\
4 ma.4.-
i......... -
---2=--
- - - - - - - - - " - - - " ' - --- - - - - - "' - - - - ^'