ML20096D712

Forwards Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Plant Assessment Methodology, Rev 1

ML20096D712
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	01/11/1996
From:	Denton R BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20096D714	List: ML20096D712 ML20096D732
References
TAC-M93326, TAC-M93327, NUDOCS 9601190237
Download: ML20096D712 (2)

Text

l l

Rostav E. DENTON Baltimore Gas and Electric Company l Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant l Nuclear Energy 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway i Lusby, Maryland 20657 410 586-2200 Ext. 4455 local 410 260-4455 Baltimore January 11,1996 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION: Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos.1 & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Revision I to Integrated Plant Assessment Methodology (TAC Nos. M93326 and M93327)

REFERENCES:

(a) Public Meeting between NRC's and BGE's License Renewal Staffs, December 6,1995, Discussions on Responses to a Request for Additional Infomation (RAI) Concerning the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Report Entitled," Integrated Plant Assessment Methodology" (b) Letter from Mr. R. E. Denton (BGE) to NRC Document Control Desk, dated December 15, 1995, " Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Concerning the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Ibport Entitled, Integrated Plant Assessment Methodology, dated August 18,1995"(TAC Nos. M93326 and M93327)

(c) Letter from Mr. R. E. Denton (BGE) to NRC Document Control Desk, dated December 20,1995, " Proposed Changes to Integrated Plant Assessment Methodology"(TAC Nos. M93326 and M93327)

Attached please find a copy of Revision 1 of the Integrated Plant Assessment Methodology that incorporates the responses provided in References (a) and (b). It includes the changes provided in Reference (c) and additional changes subsequently discussed by telephone with the NRC License Renewal staff.

9601190237 960111 PDR J

ADOCK 05000317 P

PDR [0 18U031 l k

Document Control Desk January 11,1996 Page 2 Additionally, in Reference (b), the last paragraph of the response to the Request for Additional Information ,

Item 38 is revised as follows: I With respect to reliance on future actions,10 CFR 54.21(c) and 54.29 do not specify when re-analysis of all time-limited aging analyses (TLAAs) is required. Evaluation of TLAAs and  !

three equally =ccy= hic actions for addressing TLAAs is described in 10 CFR 54.21(c).

The 54.29 finding states that TLAAs are identified and that actions identified have been taken or will be taken with respect to TLAAs Timing for perfomung re-analysis of TLAAs will be addressed in the Systan and Commodity Report for TLAAs which will be submitted later this year. i Should you have further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. -

Very truly yours, st '/ 44:L for R. E. Denton Vice President -Nuclear Energy RED /JMO/ dim Attachment As Stated cc: (Without Anachment)

D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire L. B. Marsh, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC S. F. Newberry, NRC S. A. Reynolds, NRC T. T. Martin, NRC Resident Inspector, NRC R. I. McLean, DNR J. H. Wal'.er, PSC T. Tipton, NEl