ML20096A356
| ML20096A356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1992 |
| From: | Repka D ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | Bollwerk G, Carpenter J, Morris P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#292-12880, CON-#292-12946 91-626-02-CIVP, 91-626-2-CIVP, CIVP, NUDOCS 9205110034 | |
| Download: ML20096A356 (2) | |
Text
.
/2278 WINSTON & ST1MWN: vLnt iLi-uaWC utxsecn *t *mtow eeu we 1400 L f,TREET N W
'.-<x*o 09 c t
. As a ca**w can we
,ggrymoy gg ;ggg, ngy n 6trt a;,in m t 72 MY -5 P3 :54
"" "~
"~
zw m sno w w o. -s per,
". Q.t "c5*5 ' m 3" "
e m e ratt'
- u,. o
, r.. ~ m.m.,
1 4
- <t
- or uw ma nes
- s:
r, (202) 371-5726 au-
"m n*
May 4, 1992 G.
Paul Bollwerk, III James H. Carpenter Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Peter A.
Morris Administrative Judge 10825 South Glen Road Potomac, Maryland 20854 In the Matter of ALABAMA POWER COMPANY (Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Dp.qh et Nos.:
50-348-CivF; 50-364-CivP ASLBP No. 91-626-02-CivP
Dear Administrative Judges:
During a conference call of April 30, 1992, the Scard requested the parties to resolve one apparent conflict in the transcript errata previously submitted by the parties.
The conflict relates to certain testimony of Friday, February 21.
1 have discussed this matter with the Alabama Power Company witnesses involved and with NRC Staff counsel.
Based on these discussions, the parties now agree that the testimony erroneously attributed to Judge Carpenter (Tr. 1219, line 6; Tr. 1220, line 5; and Tr. 1221, line 24) should correctly be attributed to " Witness Jones."
As a separate matter, the Board requested that it be apprised of any developments related to the parties' plans for the order of issues at the upcoming hearing.
Counsel for the parties have again discussed this issue amongst themselves.
The parties still agree to follow the order of issues as presented in the Staff's Rebuttal Testimony (and as mirrored in Alabama Power Company's Surrebuttal Testimony).
Currently, no deviations from this order appear to be necessary.
hh O
9-7; t
t
.WINSTON w STitAWN G.
Paul Bollwerk, III May 4, 1992 l
Page 2 1
!!onethel et, for logistical reasons related to scheduling contractors and bre.n!ing witnesses from out of town, both parties t
subject to the Board's approval propose that the first technical issue (V-type termina*.lons) should not begin earlier than first thing Tuesday morning, Key 19.
While the parties estimate that the first issue (Enforcement) will take approximately one hearing day, if this pansal finishes prior to the end of the day on Monday, we would ask to recess until Tuesday morning.
If the first panel takes longer than one day, we will of course go directly into the V-type termination issue on Tuesday.
If this arrangement is not satisf actory to the Board, the part 4es will of course schedule the V-type witnesses to be available an Monday.
Respectfully submitted, Ab k
N David A.
Repka Counsel for Alabama Power Company cc:
Service List h
.z.
-