ML20095K178
| ML20095K178 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1995 |
| From: | Capra R NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20095K181 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9512280143 | |
| Download: ML20095K178 (5) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-_ 7590-01 l UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REfdLATORY COMISSION j COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N COMPANY DOCKET NOS. STN 50-454 AND STN 50-455 BYRON STATION. UNITS 1 AND 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering issuance of an exemption to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66, issued to Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed, the licensee), for operation of the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, located in Ogle County, Illinois. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of Proposed Action The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's ' application for an exemption from certain requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, " Requirements for Physical Protection of Licensed Activities in Nuclear Power Reactors Against Radiological Sabotage." The requested exemption would allow the implementation of a hand geometry biometric system off site access control in conjunction with photograph identification badges, and would allow the badges j to be taken off site. 5 The Need for the Proposed Action Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a), the licensee is required to establish and maintain an onsite physical protection system and security organization. In 10 CFR 73.55(d), " Access Requirements," it specifies in part that "The licensee shall control all points of personnel and vehicle access into a protected area." In 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5), it specifies in part that "A numbered pictured badge identification system shall be used for all individuals who are authorized access to protected areas without escort." It further indicates i 9512280143 951222 DR ADOCK 05000454 PDR i
i. ' that an individual not employed by the licensee (e.g., contractors) may be authorized access to protected areas without an escort provided the individual, " receives a picture badge upon entrance into the protected area which must be returned upon exit from the protected area." i Currently unescorted access for both employee and contractor personnel into the Byron Station, Units I and 2, is controlled through the use of picture badges. Positive identification of personnel who are authorized and request access into the protected area is established by security personnel making a visual comparison of the individual requesting access and that individual's picture badge. The picture badges are issued, sorted, and retrieved at the entrance / exit location to the protected area. In accordance with 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5), contractor personnel are not allowed to take their picture badges off site. In addition, in accordance with plant's physical security plan, the licensee's employees are also not allowed to take their picture badges off site. The licensee proposes to implement an alternative i unescorted access control system which would eliminate the need to issue and retrieve picture badges at the entrance / exit location to the protected area. l The proposal would also allow contractors who have unescorted access to keep 4 their picture badges in their possession when departing the Byron site. In 2: addition, the site security plans will be revised to allow implementation of the hand geometry system and to allow employees and contractors with unescorted access to keep their picture badges in their possession when leaving the Byron site. 1 i r
'.. Environmental Imoacts of the Proposed Action: The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action. In addition ~ to their picture badges, all individuals with authorized unescorted access will have tL physical characteristics of their hand (hand geometry) registered with their picture badge number in a computerized access control system. Therefore, all authorized individuals must not only have their picture badges to gain access into the protected area, but must also have their hand geometry confirmed. All other access processes, including search function capability and access revocation, will remain the same. A security officer responsible for access control will continue to be positioned within a bullet-resistant structure. The proposed system is only for individuals with authorized unescorted access and will not be used for individuals requiring escorts. The underlying purpose for requiring that individuals not employed by the licensee must receive and return their picture badges at the entrance / exit is to provide reasonable assurance that the access badges could not be compromised or stolen with a resulting risk that an unauthorized individual could potentially enter the protected area. Although the proposed exemption ] will allow individuals to take their picture badges off site, the proposed measures require not only that the picture badge be provided for access to the protected area, but also that verification of the hand geometry registered l with the badge be performed as discussed above. Thus, the proposed system provides an identity verification process that is equivalent to the existing process. i - ~. -
'., Accordingly, the Comission concludes that the exemption to allow individuals not employed by the licensee to take their picture badges off site will not result in an increase in the risk that an unauthorized individual could potentially enter the protected area. Consequently, the Comission concludes that there are no significant radiological impacts associated with the proposed action. The proposed exemption does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the Comission concludes that there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Alternatives to the Proposed Action: Since the Comission has concluded there is no measurable environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be evaluated. The principal alternative to the proposed action would be to deny the requested action. Denial of the requested action would not significantly enhance the environment in that the proposed action will result in a process that is equivalent to the existing l identification verification process. Alternative Use of Resources: This action does not involve the use of any resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Byron Station, Units 1 and 2. Aaencies and Persons Consulted: i In accordance with its state policy, on December 20, 1995, the staff consulted with the Illinois State official, Mr. Frank Niziolek, Head, Reactor 4
l l! ! Safety Section; Division of Engineering; Illinois Department of Nuclear i Safety, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments. f FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT l Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 1 quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption. For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's letter dated November 6,1995, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at the Byron Public Library,109 N. Franklin, P.O. Box 434, Byron, Illinois. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of December 1995. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TAf-{W Robert A. Capra, Director Project Directorate III-2 Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 l}}