ML20095H563
| ML20095H563 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1984 |
| From: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| KMLNRC-84-149, NUDOCS 8408290033 | |
| Download: ML20095H563 (13) | |
Text
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE ELECTF4C COMPANY
@LENN L MOESTER vacs motstaaet, pouctaae August 22, 1984 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 KMLNRC 84-149 Re:
Docket No. STN 50-482 Ref: KMLNRC 84-076 dated May 8, 1984 from GLKoester, KG&E, to HRDenton, NRC Subj: Revision 4 to Wolf Creek Safeguard Contingency Plan
Dear Mr. Denton:
In accordance with the Reference, furnished herewith are six (6) copies of Revision 4 to the WCGS Safeguards Contingency Plan. Attachment I describes the reason for each change and why these changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of this plan.
The previously transmitted copies of this plan are superseded in their entirety by the attached copies.
The attached document contains safeguards Information in accordance with 10CFR73.21 and therefore should be withheld from public disclosure. This letter, when separated from the attachments, does not contain Safeguards Information and should be handled as decontrolled.
Acknowledgement of receipt of this letter would be appreciated.
Yours very truly, Y
f,fu GLK:bb Attach xc: PO'Connor, w/o (2)
HBundy, w/o SBrown, w/a B[i)h33840822K05000g ddtHM TJMf65G F
WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES. HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS
@il Illlillf Ill[%. m$.2 DiCONTROLLED.
[y{
WNN $lI!b
'$$N 201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Mail Address: PO. Box 208 i Wchita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 261-6451
m OATH OF AFFIRMATION STATE OF KANSAS
)
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
I, Glenn L. Koester, of lawful age, being duly sworn upon oath, do depose, state and affirm that I am Vice President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, that I have signed the foregoing letter of transmittal, know the contents thereof, and that all statements contained therein are true.
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY By aM
//
'GTe'ns L. Ko'estier Vice President - Nuclear E.D. Prothro, Assistant Secretary STATE OF KANSAS
)
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
BE IT REMEMBERED that on this _22nd day of August, 1984
, before me, Evelyn L. Fry, a Notary, personally appeared Glenn L. Koester, Vice President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, who is personally known to me and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he dulf acknowledged the execution of the same for and on behalf of and as the act and deed of said corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the date and year above written.
jg,.$.E?l7 ph M8+u bl e
i^lsCliA W.s..\\
gvelynLfrry, Notary f
. 'i
- =
gQa;irunfssion expires on uy
( *. p August 15, 1985.
. %,r.;
- :,e g
Many of these changes involve a change in the responsible person who performs a duty or a change in his title.
A more detailed description of the changes and their justification is provided below.
Affected
~
Change i Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 1.
1-2/1.3.1 Reason for Chance This situation was omitted from the listing, but discussed in the text.
Justification No program change has been made.
2.
1-3/1.4 Reason for Chance 2-3/2.1 2-17/2.2.11 This change clarifies NRC 2-28/2.2.18 involvement.
Table 4-1 (Sh 2)
Table 4-2 (Sh 2)
Justification Table 4-3 (Sh 1)
Table 4-18 (Sh 1)
The change reflects the fact that Table 4-25 (Sh 1)
NRC involvement is not limited to Table 4-26 (Sh 3)
Region IV.
Table 4-28 (Sh 1)
Table 4-30 3.
1-3/1.4 Reason for Chance The order of succession has been redefined.
Justification The position of Call Supervisor allows for the order of succession to be better defined for all contingencies.
A management person is designated 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day as a successor to the Plant Manager.
Note that the Superintendent of Plant Support and Superintendent of
$df; M E3UARillffsijM1 Operations can hold the position of Call Supervisor.
WHEN SEPARATED FROM y g gg ENCLOSURES. HANDLE
@@dV MINSDlJN0ft]
THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
l.
4 Page 2 of 11 Affected Change'f Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 4.
1-4/1.4 Reason for Chance 3-1/3.1 3-2/3.1.1 The titles of Plant Superintendent 3-9/3.4.3 and Security Shift Supervisor has 3-10/3.5 been changed to Plant Manager and All Tables Security Shift Lieutenant.
Justification The Plant Manager and Security Shift Lieutenent perform the same security-related duties as the old Plant Superintendent and Security Shift Supervisor, respectively.
5.
1-5/1.5 Reason for Chance The Quality Branch has assumed responsibility for review of this plan.
Justification The Quality Branch is considered a more appropriate group to perform reviews and audits.
6.
2-10/2.2.5.3 Reason for Chance The section referenced was incorrect.
Justification No program change has been made.
i l
7.
2-15/2.2.10 Reason for Change l
2-18/2.2.13 l
The event type was omitted from the title.
Justification 1
No program change has been made.
WHEN SEPARATED FROM gggHffi)RMI ENCLOSURES. HANDLE p@@f FuTIMM THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLEO.
k
Pago 3 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 8.
3-1/3.1 Reason for Chance 3-2/3.1 The title Plant Support Supervisor has been changed to Superintendent of Plant Support.
His duties have been further defined and the revised order of succession has been incorporated.
Justification The Superintendent of Plant Support performs the same Security-related duties as the.old Plant Support Supervisor.
The revised order of succession is discussed in Item 3.
9.
3-1/3.1 Reason for Chance The title Operations Supervisor has been changed to Superintendent of Operations.
His relationship to the
-position of Call Superintendent has been added.
Justification The Superintendent of Operations performs the same duties as the old Operations Supervisor with the exception of the order of succession to the Plant Manager (discussed in Item 3).
The position of Call Superintendent is discussed in Item 10.
10.
3-2/3.1 Reason for Chance A description of the Call Superintendent position has been added.
Ml@ ids lWFJ3WPS D.EN SEPARATED FROM
[M ! #/ $7;Tf@T5M
?
D@ die @ikIVMIM WHEN SEPARATED FROM
- 3 ENCLOSURES. HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
\\
G--..
~ _,, _
J Page 4 of 11
'Affected Change-#
Page/Section Reason for' Change / Justification 10.
Justification The creation of the position of Call Superintendent allows the chain of.
succession to be clearly defined at all times.
Reason f'r Chanae 11.
3-2/3.1.1 o
This change reflects the creation of the Command Sargent position.
Justification The creation of the position of Command Sargent is considered to be an increase in the effectiveness of the plan since he has dedicated responsibility.for the response force which frees the SAS operator for other activities.
12.
2-5/2.2.3 Reason for Chance 2-19/2.2.13.2 3-2/3.1.1 This change corrects a typographical 3-3/3.1.1 error.
Table 4-8 Justification No program change has been made.
13.
2-3/2.2.1 Reason for Chance 3-4/3.2 This change corrects minor errors in the text.
Justification No program change has been made.
- MM3M MEM WHEN SEPARATED FROM (m) Ti@ NN ENCLOSURES. HANDLE gNg ggfyggf%TiQ THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
Page 5 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 14.-
'3-4/3.2 Reason for Chance Figure 3.1-1 This change incorporates changes submitted in Rev. 3 of the Physical Security Plan.
Justification No program changes have been made.
15.
3-4/3.3.1 Reason for Chance 3-5/3.3.1 These changes update the description of the communication system.
Justification The supplier of the telephone system may not be Bell.
This should not reduce the effectiveness of the program.
Also, the addition of a direct link plant intercom system is considered an addition to the effectiveness of the program.
16, 3-8/3.4.1 Reason for Chance Wolf Creek personnel have been trained to perform this function.
Justification This is considered an upgrade to the effectiveness of the program since response times should improve.
17, 3-11/ Chart 3-1 Reason for Chance This change was made to reflect
- gage @@ EMEM title changes.
Justification
[is Bil? @WMi&TM The newly titled positions perform
!WfrMET !!$W@ TEM the same duties as before.
1519 N A T L E 1 E M ri4 mi7 m i N WHEN SEPARATED FROM
' camp lWhq-ENCLOSURES. HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
Page 6 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 18.
3-12/ Chart 3-2 Reason for Chance This change reflects a title change
~
and the addition of the position of i.
Command Sargent.
Justification
'The Security shift Lieutenant performs the same duties as the old Security Shift Supervisor.
The addition of the Command Sargent position allows for dedicated direction to the response force and frees the SAS operator for other activities.
19.
Table 4-1 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance An administrative procedure has been developed to address this situation.
Justification The procedure provides additional guidance on what action to take in 1
this situation.
This change does not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the program.
20.
All Tables Reason for Chances The table has been revised to reflect changes in the information transmittal hierarchy.
Justification These changes ensure that the appropriate security management personnel are aware of potential threats.
@l7r1EIT@DE M VBE l
9 3T7 NRiregt W ISTE M !fDD M 1Q WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES. HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
Page 7 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 21.
Table 4-1 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance This change allows bomb disposal personnel to be notified at an earlier point in the evet.t.
Jurtification Earlier involvement by bomb disposal personnel is -considered an increase in the effectiveness of the plan.
22.
Table 4-1 (Sh 2)
Reason for Chance-Table 4-2 (Sh 2)
Table 4-18 This change was made to eliminate Table 4-20 redundant duties and avoid possible confusion over who is responsible for performing a given task.
Justification No change has been made regarding activities performed.
23.
Table 4-1 (Sh 2, 3)
Reason for Chance This change was made to prevent calling in the FBI for a noncredible threat.
Justification The FBI is notified once a threat is determined to be credible.
This
' change is not considered a decrease in the safeguards effectiveness of the plan.
24.
Table 4-1 (Sh 2)
Reason for Chance Table 4-7 This change ascures that operational considerations are provided to the Plant Manager.
?1TTIL1$ MMT[lN mi (sn rSwign WHEN SEPARATED FROM
- 9 liFTITdWMW1 d ENCLOSURES. HANDLE J
m.x,
THIS DOCUMENT AS J
DECONTROLLED.
i
Page 8 of 11 Affected Change i Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 24.
Justification The change provides additional information to the Plant Manager.
25.
Table 4-6 Reason for Chance Table 4-7 Table 4-10 This change clarifies the SSL's Table 4-15 (Sh 1) duties.
Table 4-23 (Sh 1)
Table 4-24 (Sh 2)
Justification Table 4-25 Table 4-30 The change provides additional guidance and does not reduce any of the previous duties assigned to the SSL.
26.
Table 4-12 (Sh 2)
Reason for Chance This change makes sure that the appropriate security personnel are aware of termination of the Event.
Justification The change does not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the plan since it involves assuring that appropriate security personnel are notified when the Event ends.
27.
Table 4-13 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance This change clarifies that the SSL and other security force members may be directed to provide assistance in j
this Event.
Justification
.,g ggggg[}
No program change has been made.
l4 MTEMIEff$
pqfiHTSMU WHEN SEPARATED FROM l
ENCLOSURES. HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
Page 9 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 28.
Table 4-14 Reason for Chance This change was made to allow the SS to direct this Event.
Certain duties have been reassigned.
Justification No deletions have been made regarding what duties will be performed.
Therefore, the safeguards effectiveness of this plan has not been decreased.
29.
Table 4-14 (Sh 1)
Reason for Changg The change was made to clarify action to be taken if disturbance is uncontrollable.
Justification No program change has been made.
30.
Table 4-15 (Sh 1)
Reasor for Change This change clarifies the control Room's role in this Event.
Justification This is not considered a decrease in the safeguards effectiveness of this plan since it does not reduce the duties performed, but instead clarifies the Control Room's responsibilities.
31.
Table 4-19 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance These changes were made 1) to clarify what is meant by increased security force alertness and 2) to delete notification of the CAS.
Z91M@ EMEM Ff@W N N N WHEN SEPARATED FROM E",Ttf"i (M@JtMMiQ ENCLOSURES. HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
Page 10 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification Justification 31.
- 1) No program change was made.
- 2) The CAS had no assigned duties in this event.
32.
Table 4-22 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance The text was redundant.
The SS increased the guard patrols and surveillance prior to this event.
Justification The Security Force was increased at an earlier point in this event.
33.
Table 4-24 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance The change allows the SS to take the lead in this event until the event is determined to be of a serious nature.
When the Event is determined to be serious the Plant Manager takes over.
Justification This change frees the Plant Manager to attend to other duties unless a serious threat exits.
34.
Table 4-25 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chanae This change allows LLEA's to be informed earlier for onsite situations.
Justification This is considered an increase in the effectiveness of the plan, cy;qyj$Ff [7hMN WHEtt SEPARATED FROM
@$3S p;gg@[(
ENCLOSURES. HANDLE vfmiff6a M F N M S THis DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED.
Page 11 of 11 Affected Change #
Page/Section Reason for Change / Justification 35.
Table 4-25 Reason for Chance These changes address the possibility of a Security Emergency being declared for this Event.
Justification This change provides additional guidance for this Event.
36.
Table 4-26 (Sh 1)
Reason for Chance Table 4-27 (Sh 1)
This change clarifies the security level of this Event.
Justification This change provides additional guidance for this Event.
37.
Table 4-26 (Sh 2)
Reason for Chance Additional guidance has been added for this Event.
Justification This is considered an increase in the effectiveness of this plan.
38.
Table 4-29 Reason for Chance i
This change clarifies the SAS operators duties and revises the individual responsible for activating call-in.
Justification No decrease in the function performed has occurred.
gg},74L%
WHEN SEPARATED FROM g qgggi$TNb ENCLOSURES, HANDLE
- * ' ' ' gy THIS DOCUMENT AS
.. u ms; gQflitM.
DECONTROLLED.
..,