ML20095H473
| ML20095H473 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/30/1984 |
| From: | Anthony R ANTHONY, R.L., FRIENDS OF THE EARTH |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8408280491 | |
| Download: ML20095H473 (2) | |
Text
<
,r,,
$ ar: Ili.II.A. ElEC. CO.
c a t d. 50- m, 3w. 0 I"imori<+ Gan Stn.
Unita 1 & 2.
May 30, 1984 mP LE.f;T TO R.L. AUTif0NY/ FOE MOTIO:: 13. A?/LICA:PjS MOTIOU FOR P!52TIAL ECISIO:T i.UD LO; POWER LICEISE,MID SU3 MISSION.k CO::TEI:TIONS On 1:E'll MATTER,DATEir:5/lc/84 W.w Contention 11.
PECo'has moved uranium fuel to tne linerick site without*
for a decision by the Coc=ission on our appeal, dated 47d/8 d b tkk itiner decisicn of the A'ppeal Board (3/30/84).
7/e believe that the Commission will decide in our favor on the basis of P2:Co's procedural. violations hnd lackr of g w.
randinnno to receive or store fuel. P3 is not allowed to =ove or uncover the fuel under % license issueB..
And this license will be revoked when and' if the Commisnion decides in our favor. ill the procedural violations as well as, defic-
~
inncies in PE's construction,cquip=ent, staff, procedures,and training as itemized
.in our Appeal to the Cc= mission and ot. Erief to the Appeal Board,3/28/84 are includad in this contention by reference.
tention 12. ?ie asse-rt that the dangers from an explosion on the railroad
~
h,ve not been evaluated for the hazard to fuel being transported fro = outside storage to the fuel hoistway in the plant, and uncrating there.
We veru prevonted from ehmining witnesses on the railroad blast during Cent. V 3a,ac3 b.(structural).
'"he misciles that can be launched as wil' as overprecsures, afford gran threats.
g, Cb t. 13 The PE study of "issL: 13" SER (TJREG - 0991) foruarded by J.S.
eper to A.Schwenuar;NRC, 5/4/84 evaluating the effects of high enercy lina (EEL 3j reaks on " all possible combine.tions of control syate=s" does not asseas complete.1 the rink because of the exclusion offlines which operate 2% or last a.bove 20G F.
and 275 psig.
These are lines most subject to rupture because of the fluctuations in heat and pressure and they could tngger other breaks and bring the cumulativo consequ?nces above the FSAR Chap.15 anelysis.
In addition the ffects of HEL3 brent,s en fuel ha dling h ve not boon svaluated, including breaks v.hich could rup-n a
um tare the nipe tunnel over which the fuel must pacs in :.ntering the plant (souta),
g 7
FI12 Fig.6.2-L in o vCont.14.
At the Commission meetug in Viashington on 4/24/64 the progress of oo the Lirierick licensing proceeding,amone others,was discussed.(See trans. p.38, t2 y
copy accompanying)
The applicant esti.utes a fuel load date in Augua 1984 ; the -
N S taf f as tinn tes construction completion in the spring of 19e5 Tats discrepancy tDo 7
cugeest.- en unrealistic. view of const ;ction and turn-over as i. ell as a pocsible om
~
.alosein-nrar of safety issues which *;11 not satisfy NaC requirementa and dis-
=t o ina.o,
walifies nns consideration of an expe uited decision or leu pczer fu l loadin;..
A<P t ti.m to Contentions 6,7,and 9 Iron froa ASL..rreal'3 card Ze=Ar4cdus and order c/7/N Muonwealth Edison (3yro... Locket STN 50-454,455 ).'.:uch cf this do-
- taion, ap[elt e to violations end lans<
in PE supervision of, ins:20 tion especial N,
. i 3 ' '. '
p.H "( l.
i 9M rtcomings.preclu'ied..acsun ncc..construcp On grJ1rr t:.cs d,etgtayi
e on e r. Cole,C erri ;.
~!'
cc:.lu,* - e I
1
[$O 3
_ _ = ~
, _ ~.
.a ;_,.,-., 3. 4 1.
_. -.y
.w.
~ ~
s, o
(
T s.
f k I ro L-
.n
...s* ' :%,i* e ',;
. L. - l s-s..
v'
'I. p l'
.. n s h ir[o /..,s.,
- os y
- --s o.
o m:.:
.' r,a P.', j s< u.',
k 38 g
1
?U N r AjK!{, 7 L,f. /.,., r. '
(:- D
)
-2 c.
/
.i e
g.
t u-
- s.,s..
4*t.
4.w -.
--...e - c.y 4
..e are new e,;..,.--=,L:;ne:
[
n 3
i
'a1Cng in time.
yeo
-o 3
- g. '
---g-,
- s. a,- ~., _ e r.c.k was proposing than E"'
thev wou'd b 7"
e oacy o acac-ue-a'e b4 s sur..er.
There is 5
~
a very, ve I lengthy hearing p' recess --
6 i '..
CCMMISSIONER Assr s m*e P
2-. me st=c..vou
-.e e,
-~
b u
D e -,.. you a-=-
. ew - -
m.w.e e-pplicant's official fuel lead I,
cate is Aucust'
'c
?
- 8 4 w,
.a.
w.e ene.- of. January the staff f'
had estimated ca s--
--e
- en.complet.cn would not occur until N
10 p., _,.,.
~
,r vune of 1985.
%no is 4
.w 3
N 11 k
~
I MR. DENTCN:
-e e
t, 3.3 u e--.
y.
12 sA.
vc r -.
- S u.-..,:
T =.e we,,
.e,,.
e t.
u.
~-
s
- 3 6..
g; MR. DENTCN:
More e'eu*.3
- L,-
j ms
,n.- e staff is
- C, u
,4 f...
i, c. m c t-
- 5:y
- s i g.
- k;.,
CC GIIssIogga A3.SEI.STINE:
'.'".a t ' s ' 4 e w* '
- l 9., +..
16 s.:-..
- --g 2,m'.
ve
.m 7.
--. m.o.CN:
My ew., C w.4.,.4 C n S
sr 4.
wa
-..n.k t.y i s p,. v. e i-i la 1* w411 -oa11y be impacted
.# +
'T
.t.
- - v.
-- s,r-cess but when we gen P;f k
-b4 l
.. y. :L,
13 more than six me b's d4se
- h. a
'.. T.
--erence* ye uO. dor.k ou ' w,. -h ye
.s s
r
~-.
y'
..- t 19 Q'
,. 5.g. m.
Company a better unde"s'a d4..g ce -
t C
cates ann g~n.e k,cw where
.sf.
.i 3 >
~
9
- 3n..
We stand with Lizenic,g, h.
.ur 1
s,..
r ".. a pq-c-v.
r.-
e.d h.e have '~ haC 7 ; ;;i j uw
!Y
,3 m,
- e c scussacn but
- i. -
this is one of the plants we will have ~""' e -4
{
e s c.,s, e on cecause fr,,
n
- Q.
of,the. big difference.
I shcu'd :c4 cu-cn n.e other hang g.
I m
y
~. ~x =.
thcuch scme of thesejlants where we imte a big delta the -
l 'u - 4 3.; ; y..
aCt C - 'h ~ e s
s in 14 w
}'
- s
-..e t,-
T,*y s..o.,x, inC j~
- Cne i.
~.
~.
.j e,
s.