|
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20211M2981999-08-0606 August 1999 Rev 1 to CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept, CPSES Credit for Soluble Boron & Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Capacity, Consisting of Revised Title Page and 4-1 ML20210J9391999-06-30030 June 1999 CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0003,for 970802-990630 ML20205R5701999-04-14014 April 1999 Rev 6 to ER-ME-067, TU Electric Engineering Rept,Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Sys ML20151Q1211998-08-14014 August 1998 Rev 0 to Control of Hazard Barriers ML20199J5391998-02-0202 February 1998 CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0002 for 960202-970801 ML20198Q7181997-10-24024 October 1997 Rev 5 to ER-ME-067, Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems ML20137D3601997-03-20020 March 1997 Engineering Self-Assessment Rept ML20129F6991996-10-25025 October 1996 Justification for SPC 1986 LBLOCA Evaluation Model W/Interim Adjustment for Non-Physical Behavior ML20100F2761996-02-13013 February 1996 Rev 0 of Engineering Rept, Resolution of NRC GL 95-07 'Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power- Operated Gate Valves.' ML20116M4021996-02-0101 February 1996 Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0001 for 941101- 960201 ML20095K5411995-12-18018 December 1995 Nonproprietary Small Break LOCA Analysis Methodology ML20094P7971995-11-22022 November 1995 Rev 0 to CPSES Risk-Based IST Program Risk Ranking Determination Study ML20094P7821995-11-22022 November 1995 CPSES Risk-Based IST Program Risk Ranking Determination Study Summary Rept ML20094P4231995-09-29029 September 1995 Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography Analysis of 10 Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Samples ML20085N2911995-06-21021 June 1995 Individual Plant Exam of External Events for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities TXX-9432, Rev 0 to CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept,Cpses Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Capacity1994-12-0909 December 1994 Rev 0 to CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept,Cpses Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Capacity ML20097A3821994-08-19019 August 1994 Individual Plant Exam of External Events,Seismic,Cpses ML20069M8761994-06-10010 June 1994 Engineering Rept Evaluation of Unit 1 & Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations ML20064M6081994-03-21021 March 1994 Engineering Rept Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Sys ML20059F5431993-10-0505 October 1993 Engineering Rept, Evaluation of Fir Endurance Test Results Related to Cable Functionality in 1-1/2 & 2 Inch Conduits ML18010B0841993-05-0505 May 1993 NRC Licensing Submittal Review of Licensing Conditions Imposed by NUREG-1216. ML20127K8121993-01-19019 January 1993 Rev 0,to Evaluation of Unit 2 Thermo-Lag Configurations ML20126G2121992-12-23023 December 1992 Rev 2 to ER-ME-067, Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Systems ML20126C0421992-12-18018 December 1992 Suppl 6 to Human Factors Control Room Design Review of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station ML20126A3621992-12-15015 December 1992 Rev 3 to Receipt,Dispensing,Quality & Insp Requirements for Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Matls ML18010A9521992-11-30030 November 1992 NRC Licensing Submittal Review of Licensing Conditions Imposed by NUREG-1216. ML20116C9511992-10-27027 October 1992 Individual Plant Exam Submittal:Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Vol II:Back-End Analysis ML20115D2241992-09-29029 September 1992 Rev 1 to HI-92880, Criticality SE of Comanche Peak Fuel Storage Facilities W/Fuel of 5% Enrichment ML20127C8291992-09-0808 September 1992 Rev 1 to Interim Engineering Rept, Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Sys ML20114B8051992-09-0101 September 1992 Suppl 5 to Human Factors Control Room Design Review of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station ML20114C6101992-08-31031 August 1992 Individual Plant Exam Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Vol 1:Front-End Analysis ML20105A7821992-08-14014 August 1992 Engineering Rept on Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fireproofing Coating Thicknesses Required for 1 & 2 Hour Fire Ratings for Various Structural Steel Members Used by Texas Utils Svcs,Inc ML20105A8471992-08-0606 August 1992 Rev 0 to Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Unit 2 Engineering Bwip Check Valve 2AF-0083 Failure Investigation ML20116C9621992-07-16016 July 1992 Review of IPE Level 2 Draft Repts for Cpses ML20078H1581992-06-19019 June 1992 CPSES Thermo-Lag Barrier Applications Thermo-Lag Fire Test Conduit & J-Box Test Assemblies. Preliminary Test Results ML20095H2411992-04-13013 April 1992 Validation Efforts for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Unit 2 ML20094P3371992-03-26026 March 1992 Control Room Simulator 10CFR55 Certification Initial Rept TXX-9200, RHR Line Summary Rept1992-03-23023 March 1992 RHR Line Summary Rept ML20086E3861991-10-31031 October 1991 Pressurizer Surge Line Transient Justification ML20079D0481991-06-21021 June 1991 Engineering Rept, Testing & Analysis of Commercial-Grade Swing Arms in Borg-Warner Check Valves, June 1991 ML20077E0271991-05-31031 May 1991 Methodology for Reactor Core Response to Steamline Break Events ML20217C4601991-05-31031 May 1991 Reactivity Anomaly Events Methodology ML20073Q8291991-05-17017 May 1991 Small Break LOCA Analysis Methodology ML20084V1401991-03-31031 March 1991 Safety Evaluation for Operation of Comanche Peak Unit 1 W/ Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20079D0571991-03-31031 March 1991 Final Rept on Analysis of Check Valve Swing Arms, Mar 1991 ML20066F4331991-01-31031 January 1991 Draft Analysis of Flow Stratification in Surge Line of Comanche Peak Reactor ML20066L0691990-12-31031 December 1990 Large Break LOCA Analysis Methodology ML20066B2391990-12-31031 December 1990 Control Rod Worth Analysis ML20067B1291990-12-24024 December 1990 Suppl 1 to TUE-1 DNB Correlation ML20062D9041990-11-12012 November 1990 Unit One Loose Parts Monitoring Sys Special Rept 1999-08-06
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217E8021999-10-0707 October 1999 CPSES Unit 1 Cycle 8 Colr ML20217G4151999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20212F7671999-09-24024 September 1999 SER Granting Relief Request C-4 Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i) for Unit 2,during First 10-year ISI Interval & Relief Requests B-15,B-16 & B-17 Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i) ML20216J5701999-09-16016 September 1999 Rev 2 to CPSES Unit 2 Cycle 5 Colr TXX-9920, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Cpses.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Cpses.With ML20211M2981999-08-0606 August 1999 Rev 1 to CPSES Fuel Storage Licensing Rept, CPSES Credit for Soluble Boron & Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Capacity, Consisting of Revised Title Page and 4-1 ML20210U4081999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20210D8321999-07-23023 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief Requests Re Use of 1998 Edition of Subsections IWE & Iwl of ASME Code for Containment Insp ML20209H7661999-07-15015 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20209H2721999-07-0909 July 1999 2RF04 Containment ISI Summary Rept First Interval,First Period,First Outage ML20209H2631999-07-0909 July 1999 2RF04 ISI Summary Rept First Interval,Second Period,Second Outage ML20209G7501999-07-0808 July 1999 SER Finding That Licensee Individual Plant Exam of External Events Complete with Regard to Info Requested by Suppl 4 to GL 88-20 & That IPEEE Results Reasonable Given Design, Operation & History of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station ML20196L0191999-07-0808 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Request Relief B-6 (Rev 2),B-7 (Rev2),B-12,B-13,B-14 & C-9,pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i).Technical Ltr Rept Also Encl ML20210J9391999-06-30030 June 1999 CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0003,for 970802-990630 ML20209G0801999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20196J0621999-06-29029 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Changes to Emergency Plan Re Licenses NPF-87 & NPF-89 Respectively ML20195G5141999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20216E0711999-05-21021 May 1999 1999 Graded Exercise - Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station ML20206Q0091999-05-14014 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting GL 92-08, Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers, Dtd 921217,for Comanche Peak Electric Station,Unit 1 ML20206H2061999-05-0606 May 1999 SER Accepting Exemption to App K Re Leading Edge Flowmeter for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20196L2241999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20205R5701999-04-14014 April 1999 Rev 6 to ER-ME-067, TU Electric Engineering Rept,Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Sys ML18016A9011999-04-12012 April 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Defect in Component of DSRV-16-4,Enterprise DG Sys.Caused by Potential Problem with Connecting Rod Assemblies Built Since 1986,that Have Been Converted to Use Prestressed Fasteners.Affected Rods Should Be Inspected ML20205J7831999-04-0101 April 1999 Rev 0 to ERX-99-001, CPSES Unit 2 Cycle 5 Colr ML20205N3101999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20204H6371999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Comanche Peak Units 1 & 2 ML20205N1481999-02-28028 February 1999 Corrected Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for CPSES, Units 1 & 2 ML20203A4881999-02-0303 February 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Requests for Relief B-3 - B-6,C-2 & C-3 for Plant,Unit 2 ML20210J9201999-02-0101 February 1999 CPSES 10CFR50.59 Evaluation Summary Rept 0008,for 970802- 990201 ML20202D0101999-01-27027 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting First 10-yr Interval ISI Program Plan Requests for Relief B-9,B-10 & B-11 for CPSES, Unit 1 ML20199E9961998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20207D6091998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Operating Rept for Cpses,Units 1 & 2. with ML20197K2371998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20195F3161998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20154M8841998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20154B5741998-09-30030 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee Response to GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety- Related Motor-Operated Valves. Licensee Has Established Acceptable Program ML20151W0361998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2. with ML20151Q1211998-08-14014 August 1998 Rev 0 to Control of Hazard Barriers ML20237C4061998-08-14014 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request to Implement Risk Informed IST Program ML20237C6721998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20236V3121998-07-29029 July 1998 Final Part 21 Rept Re Enterprise DSR-4 & DSRV-4 Edgs.Short Term Instability Was Found During post-installation Testing & Setup as Part of Design mod/post-work Testing Process. Different Methods Were Developed to Correct Problem ML20236R0711998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20249B2581998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20248A1671998-05-22022 May 1998 Interim Part 21 Re Enterprise DSR-4 & DSRV-4 Emergency diesel.Post-installation Testing Revealed,High Em/Rfi Levels Affected New Controllers,Whereas Original Controllers Were unaffected.Follow-up Will Be Provided No Later than 980731 ML20247G3241998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20216B8661998-04-0101 April 1998 Rev 0 to ERX-98-001, CPSES Unit 1 Cycle 7 Colr ML20216J3061998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Cpses,Units 1 & 2 ML20216J1861998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station ML20197A6951998-02-24024 February 1998 Inservice Insp Summary Rept,First Interval,Second Period, First Outage ML20199J5391998-02-0202 February 1998 CPSES Commitment Matl Change Evaluation Rept 0002 for 960202-970801 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
' **
g[ ~ b d!
ceaa e"'~~L g.1.%6 kW
\ , 7gy,3 CRL. a "-
R W3k h -
< a*) -
l
.D .
4 V
['
QC PERSONNEL INTERVIEW
_j,-
f I (j , ,
CODE: b* b ' jijh;[
.( , l V' '84 /S0 23 P4 :57
- 1. System Adequaev ll[,.[g f4 ,; .
n;@:H a) Tell me about your job.
4:17/2 l C .4L (/44/ f y' [ N be d'c Y '-
(h v> 0es ~772 A s a, n Etee.. /wr<o a-roa c b) How well do you fed you understand your job?
fjCksz. usW r A'doW'*- # t TG$
Ksos.c 16 :n R c ~ n "'
JVlCft 6 /9 fcC/) 7*s /}-e* C.C M/ #L ' C A
. $#&Y d't? MZ. S .
8 c) What do you feel is the function of QC at CPSES?
=
OC S*/o ut 0 > m%oa /204.,2% 7,m
~
L. H rps criog e //5 2z'7su'a-Pt?G /o O v.c & fy r-r e w u? ri 12 e-t- w e rs 7,,n r #ceaaeay becvin es-r+ r. n 70 To,'-g / #4.dWY WA~5 f$ c/t & 7' YH6 & r f.+9r h sc. i.c 4 wh a ry ibravaitemeper. - 77:m1 lNMfb/t?7dt y k EYA/WW$L d 7"# f/lc s'e /#ff SrQ l
- DEPOSmON 9
%gegg0sgggg pon -
gja a ; ,
y- .,
Paga 2-of 11 d) How comfortable do you feel in .your job? -
Wrz 5
(1) What makes you feel comfortable about your job?
SERso"&L 6msiuiry A eM L 4 y 4 w a l f~c (2) What makes you feel uncomfortable about your job?
We doc 4Wf e ,
e) Have you ever acen an organization chart of QC at CPSES?
Yes No f) Do you know where you are on the organization chart?
. es No g) Do you know who your supervisor is?
es No j
=
\
. .s q
.,. l Pega 3 of 11 1
.h)^ Do you know who your supervisor's bct,a.is?
/ Yes No i
- 1) How adequate is the information given to you to do your job?
. Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent Comments:-
Y M j) How meaningful are your procedures?(availability, understandability)
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent Comments: -
k / DLy1 r' u Md-
- k) How meaningful are your inspection plans or checklists?
/
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good
~
Excellent ~l Comments: -
0 No W ~f
, .. - --,w v- -
% ~
. - . i; , -j e
Psgs 4 of 11 'I G
1
- 1) Howadequateh.sthescopeofyourinspections?(explainwhether it is too =n=11, too much, . . etc. )
Inadequate Marginal L Satisfactory- Good Excellent Conuments: -
, m) How adequate is the emphasis on activities that have a bearing on quality?
(Too much, or not enough)
(Are we looking at activities that are trivial, too much?)
Inadequate Marginal / Satisfactory Good 1
Excellent -
Comments: -
- 2. Supervision a) How would you rate management -support of QC7 Inadequate Margins 1 Satisfactory Good Excellent Consnents: -
/MODML/A78 4 ac w ~
pg m, y acaco-e .raMea r Rw,., rnL kv.sn . cew,ma rewanirur r, W d S'r'lewn- ACYred On+nv.cy desrr. Acnvyr,a
% ($-G /o 36 (Lcs.Jatz. arc Q. ,
w 3. i :
Pcga 5 of 11 b) .How would you rate your supervisor's support _of your~ activities?
Inadequate Margy . Satisfactory Good VExcellent-Comments: -
be '-
a uggh-c) How well does your supervisor answer your questions?
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory od Excellent Comments: -
1 d) How available is your supervisor when you need him's
,_ _ Inadequate Marginal
. /Staisfactory Good Excellent Comments: -
m p -, +e e , - - , , -.g.. - - m e- W 6
, s. ,
Pega 6 of 11 e) How~ effectively.does your supervisor advise you of your inspection
-activities in.a timely manner? - .? A.
Inadequate Marginal tisfactory Good v
Excellent Comments: -
' f) How well does construction provide you with advance notification of activities which require QC support?
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent Comments: -
/ p.
w g) How would you rate the consistency of your supervisors decisionst 4
9
- -- , - ,n -n ., e-,- -... - , , , - . - n - - +n.
3.; ..
Pags 7 cf'll
- 3. Training:
a) 'How do you rati the training you have received to perform your job?
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory' Good Excellent Coments: - /
b) How do you rate the instructors that provide your training?
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent-Comments: -
7 lV f '
c) How do you rate the training material or training aides?
Inadequate _ Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent I
- Coments
- -
k_:
>. y.
- .=
. Pag 2 8 of 11 0
.d) - k' hat are the strong points of the training program?
'Liat:-
h; e) What are the weak points of the training program?
List:
W &
.:
) * **
s f) How adequate are examinations with respect to the job you actually perform? -
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory G1od Excellent Comments: -
M[
/
g) Do you feel the "un the Job" training is adequate for the inspection cartification program. ,
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent Conmients: -
,p p 4
__ -_, - l
. \
- ; --_; .2 p .- .!
=. .
l
^
Prga-9 of 11 l o;
h) What.do you feel-should be established'by way of a recertification or upgrading program.27 .
1
- 4. -Resources a) _ Do you feel you have enough time to perform your inspections?
k Yes -
No b) How would you rate your workload?
- . Light
/Enough Too Much . .
c) Do you feel you are subject tio ekcessive pressures from construction while doitig your inspections?
Yes
Yfhb% gif WY WIC 70 WW M&&
p; a.en po a. no vo w s. U p foua ward
& CM'3 ao s w ez c A1:ste"D
//gs f}gb Liec 7 w c ,7 &G SY ""S Y we+c Reac"dd '
m e
4-O ,-w- - - - , , - - - , - . . , - - . - - , , , , --,-,-,,,y,+ ,,,-e,,, ,
n; , r ;* ; . ~-
g 3'
_,,- .Paga 10 cf 11 d) How would you rate' equipment availability to perform your inspections or., job?
Inadequate ~ Marginal' - Satisfactory Good Excellent
-Comments: -
llh , j) ,
/
e) How wculd you rate the authority _given to you to perform your inspections?
Inadequate Marginal Satisfactory Good
- Nxcellent Comments: - -
f) Who'do you feel bears the ultimate responsibility for your inspections?
Identify: fgF M d L / d'M7~
1 l
l
. -z f,* ,.l-:*
Pcg2 11'of 11
- 5. Other .
a) What do you feel are the major problems in QC at CPSES?
4WO 4/7tH4.f's 6 t' bi! 'C Y ~
c 1 feMS I G i s sfo tr A/9-r WdT c D ef)=< W p '
Am= - Aassaa calce-nw deJS-fswrio s A-r ce uo o a g unuery-c-9 & rs-r i sp'e a.w -r. sp L ca.s n.e,*s o arms ~ -
b) What do you feel is an adequate solution to these problems?
6o-,an. mawno tw-bIHl}L.6 [] 6 @ (Lt>o W & 7's 0 ) SV$~ ~ U A ~
o 7 '~ A b kniz.c o e ez.e-r.o J < s rr+n- rc'D .
Usc sroe WetzIc R-s u erst >fD -
c) Do you feel that you have adequate communication with the construction foreman that you come in contact with?
Yes No d) Do you enjoy QC inspection work? '
Yes - No If Not - Why?
List:
9 I
'm l
_. . e 1 P "-^"
f- ~
p
- Q 'g'
& w&im Lwtu aspem w -
c usu . a, ,,,. ,,, , -
, , C b's wa - wsm, f* fAS!2 14/8kWia. k k /l?'rz
~
M%
u m /r on m" Meu@ 4ud cf m M s' t A*
%AM#/*cW w@ 4 -
ker' a,s sm nn.r we w re e An,-
f=ica Jrny is b'uc c ena t t= afR W,+ yrs rs $Jont 71
$4 g3 7,z . +& .LeTo o "
_- -.- -_