ML20095E478

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Pages 16A & 16B of TMI Alert Second Set of Interrogatories Re Training Issue.Amend to Document Request 36 of Second Request for Production to Ref Interrogatories 28,29 & 30 Recommended.Related Correspondence
ML20095E478
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 08/21/1984
From: Bernabei L
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, THREE MILE ISLAND ALERT
To: Bauser D
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
References
SP, NUDOCS 8408240251
Download: ML20095E478 (3)


Text

.

.h U

~

-REUiTIC CC:;...T.D2ncE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABlU1Y PROJECT Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009 COLKETED (202)234-9382 USNRC

'84 AGO 23 All :20 Hand-Delivered August 21, 1984

[c Ms. Deborah Bauser, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036 In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Company (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No.1)-

Docket No. 50-289 SP

Dear Ms. Bauser:

I am forwarding to you and serving on all parties two pages which we inadvertently omitted from TMIA's Second Set of Interrogatories to GPU concerning the training issue.

Since the pages of the first pleading were misnumbered, I have

r. ember these additional pages "16A" and "16B".

In addition, please note that document request number 36 of TMIA's Second Request for Production to GPU should be amended to reference Interrogatory Nos. 28, 29, and 30, in addition to those listed.

I appreciate your bringing this error to my attention.

If you have any further questions, please contact me at (504) 861-3075.

Sincerely yours,.

8408240251 840821 PDR ADOCK 05000289 Lynn Bernabei o

PDR Attorney for Three Mile Island Alert Enclosure (as stated) cc: Service List DSo]

u 1

- 16A -

i I,

8 (d) recommendations, naggestions, conclusions or

~

results -reached. in such investigation, inquiry, study, ' research, ort report identified above; 4

(e) all documents which' refer to, mention, concern,

- memorialide or 'otherwise relate to any investigation, inquiry,.

4 study, research, or report identified above; and (f) any action taken by GPU management.in response to any investigation, inquiry, study, research,or report, or their recommendations or suggestions, identified above.

28.

Identify all criteria GPU has established for training instructors since the ASLB PID, including but not limited to

't those referenced on page 21 of the Special Report.

4 Identify all documents which contain, refer to, mention, recommend or otherwise concern the criteria identified above.

L 29.

Describe in detail the duties and responsibilities of the Director of Training and Education, the Managers. of Training, Section.and Group Supervisors, examiners and proctors, as referenced v

on page 25 of the Special Report.

Describe the scope and substance of interviews conducted by the Vice-President / Director of TMI-I with all operators, as refer-t-

enced on page 25 of the Special Report.

Identify in your descrip-tion the following:

L (a) any instructions, directions or guidance given

{

the operators in the interviews; (b) any information obtained from the operators during

+

-,w.

.,.--,,---=-wm,..-_-,,,-w_,,,

g,+,.,--#,-..-,re-..-,,em.m

._,--..--,.,eq.,mv.--

7-r..m y. e e,w ey--+-,mw--,e

.~

- 16B -

the interview; and.

(c) any documents memorializing, mentioning, referring to, or otherwise concerning these interviews.

30.

Describe all security procedures developed and implemented by GPU to prevent cheating, as referenced on page 25 of the Special Report.

Include in your description any portion of the program

- which concerns preparation, storage, or administration.

State whether these security procedures are the primary method by which GPU intends to prevent cheating on operator exam-inations in the future.

If your answer is yes, explain the factual basis'for your answers.

For all security procedures described above, identify the

.following:

l (a) the problem or finding it was designed to l

address; (b) the date on which it became effective; l

(c) all actions GPU has taken to implement the procedure since the procedu;e became effective; and i

4 O