ML20095B157

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- September 1995

ML20095B157
Person / Time
Issue date:	11/30/1995
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V42-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V42-I1, NUDOCS 9512080146
Download: ML20095B157 (21)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ ___ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _. _ - _ _. I i NUREG-0750 Vol. 42 Index 1 I

ngmnnn,

,,-n m n,n n,,,w n n ~,n n n n _. j l y%. h:

13 1

j 4 n ....... ~. ~. ~ 1 i B !INDEXESITOi ~ O i'~~!Nddl!$nRIRndbi.ATDRW I i [lI ' ldDNIMissidN$S$.0XNC. Edf $e l m. ~ ~ .* * ', ) {. '"' 4xp ,:rg.. g k:^ ^ ~ '3 l g $5 n 4

g 3

7 jjk }{ .+,; ...H::Mi.};g:,, 7. h}; fdUlpc-:MSept6mbsG-9951,m' pg u M I . 2 :n gge sy-l

1 p

s a 3 [ p q-o p: ; ~ s l 1 [ g 4-1 + / s y 4,- ,,y e y , '#:J j q o(g .a .j .'j - s c 3 x- -

Lo k:

j:n - + !;4:t 1 $M);i ~ ~ d$ e" - y $j 0 - y =., > 7r..- e: g c ) y G i: .i r y a [ ;[ ^

L-..

+ E:- a... .2 g n.. j - ' r.':... :. _,... ;.:: ;. x f. .q s v f:3. [ ' i';Q Obi w p i a m n l V q + f l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i. 1 I 1 i i t 9 j i 1 4 1 2 i T i 9512080146 951130 l 1 PDR NUREG t 0750 R PDR

~.. .-k' i i J j - l i . Available from f Superintendent of Documents l . U.S. Government Printing Office j P.O. Box 37082.: Washington, DC 20402-9328 .l P A year's subscription consists of '12' softbound issues. l 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication. l t Single copies of this publication are available from National Technical information Service Springfield, VA 22161 i i l i 1 t 1 i l Errors in this publication may be reported to the Division of Freedom of information and Publications Services Office of Administration i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j Washington, DC 20555-0001 j ~ (301/415-6844)'. 1 l l 1 h i.

. ~....... -. _ _ - - -... - i l i i NUREG-0750 Vol. 42 index1 s i INDEXES TO 1 i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES 1 4 l July - September i l l 1 i i' ? i i i i I i l-i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, s s-1 j i i Prepared by the l Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services l l Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301/415-6844) s i i l, i i 4

O [a i Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Liansing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative IJw Judges (AIJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking - , (DPRM) are p-d in this document. Dese digests and indexes are intended j to serve as a guide to the issuances. t Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: Case name (owner (s) of facility) l Ibli text reference (volume and pagination) Issuance number Issues raised by appellants._ Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes) Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating license, etc.) Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.). ncsc information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats l arranged as follows: }

1. Case Name Index l

%c case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of 3 the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

2. Digests and Headers l

Dc headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows: } the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), I the Administrative Law Judge (ALI), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). l De header identifics the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance. De digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the n: solution of the l issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically. 111 { 1 e

i

3. Legal Citations Index

-{ Dis index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alpha-numerical arrangements of Cases. Regulations, Statutes, and Others. Desc citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes f may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance. ne references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular l Issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference. l ?

4. Subject Index Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. De subject L.adings are followed by j

phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. Dese phrases are followed by the issuance number i and the full text reference. 5, l'acility Index i Ec index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference. i i ? i I IV i t I

4 i { e l I ( CASE NAME INDEX BOSTON EDISON COMPANY j RLQUEST IOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 5 2.206; Docket No. 50 293 I (Ucense No. DRP 35); DD-95-19,42 NRC 78 (1995) CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSTTY OF MISSOURI l MATERIAIJ5 UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Petman for Parnal i Reconsideration); Docket Nos. 70-00270, 30-02278-MLA (Byproduct Ucense No. 24410513-32; l Special Nuclear Materials Ucense No. SNM-247) (TRUMP-S Project), CLI.95 ll, 42 NRC 47 (1995) 4 GENERAL PUBl.lc UTILTTIES NUCLEAR CORPORATION REQUEST FOR ACTION, PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 5 2.206, Docket No. 54219, DD-9518,42 NRC 67 (1995) GLORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOIDGY OPERATING UCENSE MODIFICATION; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Interventmn Petition); Docket No. 50160 OM (ASLBP No. 95-71401 OM) (Order Mod fying Facihty Operating Ucense No. R.971; LDP-95-14,42 NRC 5 (1995) g OPERATING UCENSE RENEWAL; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR; Docket No. 54164Ren (Renewal of Ucense No R-97); CLi-9510,42 NRC l (1995) f RLQUEST FOR ACTION, PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R.12.206; Docket No. 54160. DD-9515,42 NRC 20 (1995) j GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et al. y OPERATING 1.!CLNSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Request for Discovery l Concermng Enter Dixon); Docket Nos. 54424-OLA 3, 50 425-OLA-3 (ASLBP No. 93-67101-OLA 3) (Re: Ucense Anendmem; Transfer to Southern Nuclear); LDP-9515, 42 NRC Si (1995) HARTSELI. D. PHILLIPS. JR. ENIORCLMENT ACTION, MI.MORANDUM AND ORDER (Dismissal Pursuant to Agreemes); Docket No. lA 944101 (ASLBP No. 94494-05-EA) (Re: Allegation of Debberate Violations); LBP-95-16,42 NRC 99 (1995) NORTHEAST NUCLEAR LNLRGY COMPANY REQUEST FOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDLR 10 C.F R. 6 2.206; Ducket No 54245; DD-9516,42 NRC 57 (1995) RLQUEST TOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DLCISION UNDER 80 C.F.R. 4 2.206; Docket Nos. 50-245. 54336; DD-9517,42 NRC 61 (1995) ROSLMOUNT NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED REQUEST FOR ACllON, DIRIX' TOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 4 2 206, Docket No l 99900271; DD-9513, 42 NRC 9 (1995) l SOUTHERN CALHORNIA EDISON CX)MPANY et al. RLOUI.ST FOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DLCISION UNDER 10 C F R.12 206, Docket Nos 50-361, j 54362; DD-9514. 42 NRC 15 (1995) TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORTTY RIQULST f0R ACTION, DIRECIOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. 6 2 206: Docket Nos 50-390, i 54391; DD-95 ?D,42 NRC 105 (1995) i 1 1 1 2 1 1 b i l ? l ij

.. _ _ -. - _ - - ~ - ~ , _.. _ - _ - - - - _.. -. _ ~. _. C q l I li i k I j 4 J. 4 I ( 1 4 i I 4 1 1 i 1 i k DIGESTS ISSUANCE 5 OF TiiE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j i i l CU-95-10 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLDGY (Georgia Tech Research Reactor. Atlanta. Georgia), a Docket No. 54164Ren (Renewal of License No. R 97); OPERATING LICENSE RENEWAL; July 26, l 1995; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1 l A la this proceeding involving a heense renewal apphcanon 61ed by tie Georgia lasutute of j Technology (Georgia Tech) de Comnussion currently is considenng appeals from Atomic Safety and Ucensing Board order LDP 954, 41 NRC 281 (1995), which granted the Georgians Against Nuclear ) Energy's (G ANE) peutmn for leave to intervene and adttutted two contennons. one challenging the physical secunty at the Georgia Tech Research Reactor (GTRR), and the other alleging problems in the GTRR's managenwnt. Georgia Tech and the Nuclear Regulatory Comnussion Staff requested the Comnussion to stay discovery pending resoluuon of tlw appeals. I B la light of new facts received, the Comnussion hfts its earlier imposed temporary stay of discovery, f vacates the Ucensing Board decision on the secunty contennon and remands the secunty contention to the Board for reconsiderauon CLI-95-il CURATORS OF THE UNIVI.RSITY OF MISSOURI. Docket Nos 70-00270, 30-02278-MIA (Dyproduct bcense No 24-00513-32; Special Nuclear Matenals Ucense No. SNM-247) (TRUMP S Pmject); MATERIAIS 1.lCENSE AMENDMENT; August 2L 1995; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Peuuan for Partial Reconsiderauon) I A The Comtrussion demes the University of Missouri's peution for reconsidersunn seeking a clan 6 canon that the " Sue Area Emergency" classi6 canon for its MURR facihty cornes into play only shen a 6te or accident involvmg nuclear matenals could lead so radiation exposures possibly approuclung l l-rem whole-body dose at she site boundary. The Commission rules that a reference to the site bcmndary is I already imphcit in the esisting "Sne Area Emergency" condit6on. In addition, the Commission sua snonte requires the University either 0) to require evaruauon of all persons (except emergency personnel) to a point at least 150 meters from the Alpha Lab whenever an Alert is declared as a result of a 6re involving TRUMP S matenals or 06) to provide the NRC Staff ruf6cient informatwn to deternune that the cusung Emergency Plan and procedures (or any peuposed modi 6 canons of the Plan and procedures) adequately protect the pubhc withm the site boundary in the case of a 6re involving TRUMP-S matenals i i I P i li 3

_.___--_______.___._._._-_--.m._..m l I i t n { f ) i I i I i f DIGESTS l ISSUANCES OF TifE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS t I l l l LDP 9514 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOll)GY (Georgia Tech Research Reactor, Atlanta, Georgia), j Docket No. 54160'OM (ASLBP No 95-710 01-OM)(Order Modifying Facihry Operaung Ucense No. l R 97); OPERATING LICENSE MODiflCATION, July 31, 1995; MEMOP ANDUM AND ORDER 8 (lmervennon Peution) A In a proceeding involvmg the proposed conversmn of fuel in a research reactor from high enriched fuel (HEU) to low-ennched fuel (11U), the Licensmg Board accepts the standmg of the Peutioner for i imervemion based on standing estabbshed by that Imervenor in an ongoing beense-renewal proceeding (subject to con 6rmauon that the nrmber upon whom the latervemir rehed in the senewal proceedmg also seeks representauon m the instant proceeding) The Board sets schedules for the Ghng of proposed contentions and responses thereto, B Under certain circumstances, even if a current proceeding as separate from an earher proceeding, the Comnusuon may refuse to apply its ruks of procedure in an overly formahstic manner by requinns that petiuoners parucipalmg in the earlier proceedmg must again identify their interests to parucipate in the current proceed ng Georgia Power Co (Vogtle Electric Genermung Plant, Umts I and 2), LBP-91-33,34 NRC 138 (1991). l LBP-95-15 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et ni (Vogtie Electric Generaung Plant, Units I and 2), Docket { Nos $0-424 OLA 3,54425-OLA 3 (ASLBP No 9347101-OLA 3)(Re: License Anendment, Transfer 5 to Southern Nuclear), OPLRATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; August 3,1995; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LRequest for Discovery Concerning Ester Diaon) A De Atomic Safety and Ucensmg Board held that a secretary's cmnmumcanons, recorded in a note by her employer's attorney, are unhkely to be discoverable because they are pnvileged communicanons of a client to an attoeney. However. the Board ordered the in camera inspecuan of the smotes before reaciung l a Anal determination conceming the specinc factual circumstances present in this case and the apphcabsbry of the purposes of the attorney-chent pnvilege. B When the chent is a corporation, the attorney-chent pnvikge apphes to conuoumcations by any corpor.te employee regardless of position when the commumcations concern matters within the scope of l the employce's corporate duucs and the employee is aware that the informauon is being furnished to enable the aitorney to provide legal advice to the corporation Upjotm Co. v. Umted States,449 U.S. 383, 396-97, 101 S. Ct. 677,685-86 (1981). C When a claim of anorney chent pnvilege is made for a docunent contaamns a sunple report of facts, the Atonue Safety and Ucensmg Board may exanune the document furtter in order to ascertain g I whether grantmg pnvilege to the document as consistent with the purposes of the anorney-chent pnvilege LBP-95-16 HARI' SELL D PHILLIPS, JR. (West Virgima), Docket No. IA 94-001 (ASLBP No 94-694-05-EA) (Re, Allegation of Debberate Violanons), ENFORCEMENT AETION, September 19, 1995-, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Disnussal Pursuant to Agreenent) A The Board disnuswd dus case by adopung a sertienrm agreenem reached by Mr. Philhps and the 4 j Staff of the Nuctrar Reguisory Cannussion. The Seulenent occuned after Mr Philhps pled guihy to a i one-count S,, sneding Informatmo stating a violanon of law. The terms of the agreement, which the Board l adopted, pp v ied for Mr Pfullaps to be suspended from parucipanon in the nuclear industry for a period of time q 1 s 3 S i l 1 1 1 l 1

... - -~~ ~ - ~ _. - - _. - ~ . - _ ~. -. -. - - -.. l' I-i l l 1 I l i 1 I (l' I I f I l l DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS I i I 1 DD-95-l) ROSEMOUNT NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED (Eden Prairie, Minnesota). Docket No. 99900271; REQUEST IOR ACTION, July 5,1995; DIRECTOR'S DECislON UNDER 10 C.F.R. I 2.206 A The Director of the Ofhce of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon denies a peution by Paul M, Blanch that requested certain acuon with regard to Rosernount Nuclear Instruments, Incorporated (Rosemount). The petuion requested that: (1) Rosemount immediately inform all users of safety-related transmitters in accordance with the requirenrnis of 10 C F R. Part 21 of the shelf-hfe bnutations of its pressure transmitter sensor cell All-oil and that the hil-oil may crystalhae if the transnutters are exposed to temperatures of less than 70"F, and provide all avadable information to each licensee for evaluation; (2) the NRC take prompt i and vigorous" coforcenent action against Rosemount for knowingly and consciously faihng to provide nou6cahon as required by 10 C.F R Part 21 of these issues and that a separate violation be issued for each defect and failure to provide the required notice; and 0) the NRC consider escalated enforcenwns acuon due to the repetinve nature of the alleged violations. DD-9514 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, et at (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Station. Units 2 and 3), Docket Nos. 50 361, 50-362; REQUEST FOR ACTION; July 24, 1995. DIRITIOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. I 2 206 1 The Director. Ofhce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, demes a petitioa filed on September 19,1994, A and supplemented by letters dated December 2 and December 7,1994, by Mr. Richard M. Dean requesung a shuukiwn of the San Onofre Nuclear Genernung Stauon (SONGS). The request was based on concerns regarding the closure of the Pacinc Coast thghway and the recent 6nanciallosses incurred by Orange County as related to the County's abibry to effecovely participate in enwrgency evacuanon plans in the event of an j emergency at SONGS. DD-9515 GEORGIA INS 1TTLTTE OF TECHNOLDGY (Georgia Tech Research Reactor, Atlanta, Georgia). Docket No. 50160; REQUEST FOR ACTION, July 31, 1995; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. I2.206 A The Actmg thrector, Othee of Nucient Reactor Regulanon, parually demes a pention dated October 23,1994. 61ed by Ms Pamela Blockey O'Brien (Petsuoner). This Parnal Director's Decision also considered subsequent letters from the Pettuoner dated November 12 and December 4,1994. february 21, February 23, March 6, March 28, April 19. May I8. June 27, and July 15,1995. The Peutioner requested (1) the shutdown and decontanunation of the Georgia Tech Research Rea,.mr (2) the revocation of hquid ra&oactive material release authonty to all hcensees. O) the revocanon of hcenses that use the principle of as low as reasonably actuevable, (4) the ternunauon of transportauen of rascacuve matenal by nuul, and (5) the mo&6 canon l to postmg reqmrements for rascacuve matenal. After a review of the Petitioner's concerns, the Acting Threcu concluded that the Peunener's cimeerns, addressed to date, do not raise substamial health and l safety concerns warranung the requested actions The reasons for the parual demal are fully set forth in the Parual Direct #s Decision. j-DD-9516 NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY (Milhtone Nuclear Power Stanon, I au l), Dxket No 50245; REQUEST IOR ACTION. August 2,1995; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNE'cR 10 1 l C.F R I2.206 A The Director of the Othee of Enforcement has denied a pennon 6 led by Clarence O. Reynolds j i ) requesung that the NRC take immediate escalated enforcement acuc.n with regard to Millsmne Nuclear j Power Station Unit I on the basis of alleged disermunatory accons taken armnst lum. Speci6cally. Mr. j 1 I 7 i l i i 1 i 1i l I--

DIGFSTS ISSUANCt3 OF DikECTORS' DECISIONS Reynuids requested that muluple Seventy level il um! 111 violanons be issued agenst the Malluone Urut I Maimenance Depanment, that suspension of Mmmenanc.e Drpartment managenent be insatuted pendmg a compleie invesugatum, and thai he be immediately remstated as maiorenance mechanic pendmg compleuon of die invesuganon The teamms for the denial are fully set fonh in the Decision. DD-95-17 NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY (Mdisione Nuclear Power Simion, Umts 1 and 2). Docket Nos 50-245, 50 336; REQUEST FOR ACTION, August 2,1995, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDI R 10 CER. I 2 206 A The Director of the Ofhce of Enforcement has demed peutmns 6 led by Anthony J. Ross requestmg that the NRC take escalated enforcenent acuon with regard to violations at Mdistone Nuclear Power Stanon arismg from alleged escnnunatory acts conmutted by tus supervisors. Mr. Ross asks that the NRC issue Seventy 1sul 11 and !!! violanons and other sancuens agamst the supervisors who comnuned the alleged acts of discnnunanon, and that Seventy Isvel I violanons be issued aganst senior managers for faibog to recufy the problem. The reasons for the demal are fully set forth in sie Dectuon DD-9518 GLNERAL PUBLIC LTilLITILS NUCLIAR CORPORATION (Oyster Creek Nuclear Genernung Stauunk Ducket No. 50-219. REQULST FOR ACTION, August 4.1995; PARTIAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDLR 10 C r R. 5 2.206 A The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon demes in part a petmon dated September 19, 1994, filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Comnussion tNRC) by Reaciar Watchdog Project. Nuclear Infurmaten and Resource Service (NIRS) and Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch (Peuuonersk requesung that the NRC take acuou with respect to the General Pubhe Unht;es Nuclear Calpurauon (GPUN or Ucensee) Oyuer Creek Nuclear Generstmg Stanon (OCNGS)_ The pennon requests that the NRC: (1) imnremely suspend de OCNGS operatmg heense unut the Licensee inspects and repers or replaces all safety class reactor innernal component pans subject to embnulenent and cracking,(2)irre reasely suspend the OCNGS operaung heense umd tiw Licensee subnuts an analyus regarding the synergisuo effects of through-wall crackmg of muluple safety class compotrnes. (3)imnraaicly suspend the OCNGS operaung beense until ste lacensee has analyzed and smugated any areas of noncomphance with regard to trra&ated fuel puoi coohng as a single ums boshng-wmer reactor (BWRk and (4) issue a genene letter requinns other heenseen of single-umt DWRs to subnut mfonnanon regardmg fuel pool boihng in order to venfy comphance with regulamry requiremens. and to promptly take appropnate nunganve action if the umt is hol in comphance. B The December 13,1994 Supplenrmal Pention requests that the NRC: (1) suspend the beense of etw OCNGS until the Petmoners' concerns regareng crackmg are aldressed, includmg inspecunn of all reactor vessel miemal components and other safety-relaled systems suscepubic to meergranular stress cortouon cradung (IGSCC) and compienon of any and all neecisary repairs and emulahcanons. (2) explain discrepancies between the response of the NRC Staff, dated Ociober27,1994, to the Petmon of September 19,1994, atxt the timelo-bod calculanons for the FitzPatnck plant. (3) require GPUN to pmduce docunrnts for evalualmn of the ume-to-boil calculanon for the OCNGS irra&aied fuel pool. (4)idenufy redundant componems that may be powered imm onnie power supphes to be used for spent fuel pool cochng as quahned Class IE syuems. (5) hold a pubhc nretmg in Toms River, New Jersey, to pernut presentatma of adanonal mformanon related to the pennon, and (6) treat the Petinoner's leuer of December 13. 1994, as a formal appeal of the demal of Peuuoners' request of Sepienter 19. 1994,to inuneentely suspend the OCNGS operaung hcense C After review of the issues related to cradmg of reactor internal components ra. sed by Requests (1) and (2) of the September 19, 1994 Peurmn. and Requesi (1) of ur December 13.1994Supi* mental Petmon, the pennon is demed with respect to these requests because the issues raised by the Peuuoners are bemg adequately a&lressed already. A Director's Decismn concenung the issues related to irradiated fuel pol cnohng and fuel pool boilms, raised by Requests (3) and (4) of the September 19.1994Peupon anJ Requests (2), (3), and (4) of the December 13,1994supplenental Penhon wdl be assued upon compicuon of NRC Staff's review reparang those maners. Pentmner's request for a public necung ud for treatment of their letter of December 13. 1994. as a fornud appeal of the NRC Staff's demal of their requem of September 19.1994. for immediate suspension of die OCNGS operstmg hcense, was demed by letter dated Apnl10,I M 8

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' Dt,CISIONS DD-95-19 BOSTON LDISON COkiPANY (Pdgnm Nuclear Power SmonA Docket No. 54293 (Lwense No DRP-35) REQUEST FOR ACTK)N. August 31,1995. DikECTOR'S DECISION L'NDER 10 CJ R. I 2.2(E A 11e Durctoe of tie Ofhce of Nuclear Reacke Regulanon grants in part and demes in part a pention dated Mach 10. 1995. subnuited by Mary [hzabeth tampert and saty two other individuals pursuant to 10 C F R. I 2 206, and whkh requests accon with regard to tim Pagnm Nuclear Power Stanon (Pilgnmh operated by the Boston (Anon Company (Ucensee). B Penneners' request that the NRC not pernut reoart of Pilgrim umil repers are perfarned and correcuve acuan is taken with respect to a umber of certen reactor imernals. pans, and cornporents was demed because all polemaal probierns iderwined by Feutioners had been asusfadonly addressed by the licenat Peanoners' request to sernunale the NRC pohcy of inuing nonces of enfoicenrnt discrenon to reactor beensees was demed. Pennoners' mpest for a pubhc meeung an Plymouth. Massachusetts, was grumed DD 95 TENNESSI.E VAll1Y AtJTHORfrY (Wans Bar Nuclear lant). Dnckri Nos 50-390. 54 391; REQUE.1T IOR ACTION: September 13,1995; DIRECTOR'S DLC.SION UNDE.R 10 C F A 234 A The Director of the Of6ce of Enforcement demes a petim dated February 25.1994 hied with the Nuclear Regulmary Carnnussion (NRC or Conumisson) by t'eorge M Gdhian (Pennoner), and supplenrnied by leners da-d June 16. June 28. July 6.1994, and hbruary 24 and 28.1995,requesung enforcenene accon pursuana to 10 CIR 6 2.206 s'peution) The petmon requested that the NRC. (1) smnedsately mipose a 525.000 per day Ane on Tennessee Valley Authemry (TVA) unut all repnsat. immudanon. harassnrnt, and disenmanation schons involvmg the Pennoner are senled to his sausfaction, and (2) appoint an independent arbitration board to review all past DOL suits and LEO complams filed agamst TVA soncermag Watts Bar. B After an evaluatma of the peution. the Director concluded that the Peutioner's cinna me unsubstaisiated and that enforcemem action is not necessary as ttus ume I i 1 9 i l 1 l 4

l I f l l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Adnural Insurance Co. v Umsed States Distnct Court. 881 F.2d 1486,1492 (9th Car.1989) standard for apphcation of attorney-ches pnvilege; LBP4515,42 NRC 51 (1995) Consohdated Edison Co. of New York (Insan Point, Umts I, 2, and 3), CLI-758, 2 NRC 173,175 (1975) standard for insurunon of show..ause proceedmgs. DD-95-14, 42 NRC 18 (1995); DD'95-15, 42 NRC 38 (1995), DD 951's, 42 NRC 97 (1995) Consumers Power Co (Midland Plant, Umts I and 2), CL174-3,7 AEC 7,12 (1974) sian&ng to intervene in informal procce&ngs based on parucipation in earher procee&ngs; LDP-9514. 42 NRC 6-7 (1995) Duke Power Co (Catawha Nuclear Stanon. Lists I and 2), C118531,18 NRC 1303,1305 (1983) standard fortapphcanon of asternry-chent pnvilege; LBP-95-15,42 NRC 53 (1995) l Georgia Power Co. (Vogt!c Electne Generaung Plant, Units I and 2), LBP-91-33, 34 NRC 138,14l j I (1991) stanang to intervene in informal proceedmgs based on parucipanon in carher proceedings; I LBP 9514,42 NRC 6-7 (1995) l Georgia Power Co (Voftle Liectnc Generating Plant, Umts I and 2), LBP-93-18, 38 NRC 121,124,125 l l (1993) escovery of privileged rnatenal. LDP-9515,42 NRC 52 (1995) Southern Ralway Co v. lanham, 403 F.2d 119 (5th Cir.19'4) in camera eaanunation of allegedly pnvileged notes; LBP.9tl5. 42 NRC 54 (1995) Upyohn Co. v. Umted States, 449 U S. 383, 396-97,101 S. Ct. 677, 68546 (1981) standard for apphcanon of aturney-chent pnvilege; LBP-95-15. 42 NRC 53 (1995) Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2), DD-84 7,19 NRC 899. 923 (1984) standard for insutunon of show cause procce&nFs. DD-95!9,42 NRC 97 (1995) Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2), DD-84-7,19 NRC 899, 924 i l (1984) standard for insutuuon of show-cause procee&ngs. DD-95-14, 42 NRC 18 (1995), DD-95-15. 42 ] NRC 38 (1995) [ I 11 .4

l i l i l I l l i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX l REGULATIONS 10 C.F.R. 2.202 heanng nghts on enforcemem actnms: LBP-9516, 42 NRC 101 (1995) 10 C.F R 2.203 settlenent agreenrnts on enforcenes acunns; LEP-95-16. 42 NRC 101 (1995) 10 C.F R. 2.206 county parucipanon in energency evacuation, DD-9514,42 NRC 15-19 (1995) dssennuaanon agamst bcensee employee for raising safety concerns, request for action on; DD-9516,42 NRC 57-60 (1995); DD-9517,42 NRC 61-66 0995) disennunauon against hcensee employee for raising safety concerns; DD-9520, 42 NRC 10510 (1995) enihnnlemem and cracking of safety-class reactor internal comparents; DD-95-18, 42 NRC 67-77 (1995) 4 nouficauon of equipment defects, requirement for; DD-9513, 42 NRC 6-14 (1995) radioactive release concerns about research reactor; DD-95-15,42 NRC 2145 (1995) reactor internal components, deienoration of. DD-9519,42 NRC 78-97 r1995) sianoird for iratitunon of show cause procce&nFs; DD-9515, 42 NRC 44 (1995) 10 C F.R. 2.714(b) contention ples&ng requireness in informal proceedings; LBP-9514, 42 NRC 7 (1995) l 10 C F.R. 2.714<bMI) contennon plea &ng requirements in imual hearing request; LBP 9514, 42 NRC 6 7 0995) 10 C F R 2.714(b)(2) contennot adnussibihty standards in operaung heense renewal procecengs; CLI-95-10, 42 NRC 3 I (1995) 10 C F R. 2.714(d) contention pleadmg requirenrnas in informal proceedings; LBP-9514, 42 NRC 7 (1995) 10 C F.R. 2.714(dK2) contenuon adnussibihty standards in operaung beense renewal proceedmgs; CLI-95-10, 42 NRC 3 (1995) 10 C F R 2714a appeals of bcensing board rulings on meervenuon. CLI-9510,42 NRC 2 (1995) 10 C F R. 2.7406b)(2) discovery of enal preparation nweetals; LBP-9515,42 NRC 52 (1995) 10 C F R. 21802 forum for challenges to NRC rules; DD-9515. 42 NRC 44 n 43 (1995) 10 C F R. 8 4 mumcipal juns&ctmn owr NRC-reFulated facahues; DD-9515, 42 NRC 31 (1995) 10 CT R Part 20 a%orne effluent releases from Georgia Tech research reactor; DD-95-15, 42 NRC 24, 25 (1995) venficanon of comphance with requirenrats of. DD-9515,42 NRC 37 (1995) 10 C F.R. 20.303 ra&oacuve matenals releases to samtary newer systems. DD-9515,42 NRC 30 a.13 (1995) 4 10 C F.R 20.2003 ra&oactive matenals releases to sanitary acwcr systems; DD-9515,42 NRC 30 (1995) 1 4i i f 15 i I 1 1, 4 t

.m m. _ LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGUI.ATIDNS 10 C F.R 211 i sou6 canon of defects in safety-related equiprnem; DD-9513, 42 NRC 10 (1995) ~ 10 Cf R. 21.3 defamuon of deviarmn" and " defect"; DD-9%I3. 42 NRC 10 a 1 (1995) suppher respunuluhry to mform custourrs of equipmem defects or devianons, DD-9513. 42 NRC 12 (1995) 10 CF.R. 21.21 repurung of spers fuel puul coohng system design ciarrns: DD-95-19. 42 NRC 86 (1995) 10 C F R 21.21(a) responsatnbry for evaluanns equipment devianons and comphance fadures; DD-95-13,42 NkC 10 (1995) 10 C F.R. 21.21(aM3xi) de6nmon of "f ulure to comply" relauve to safety-retared equipmem: DD-9513. 42 NkC 10 a 1 (1995) 10 Cf R 21.21(b) safety-related equspment suppher responubihties for defecove eqmpnrni. DD-9513. 42 NRC 1(Lil (1995) 10 CJ R. 3010 dehherme sruscanduct in volanon of. l BP 95-16. 42 NRC 101 (1995) 10 C F R 404 dehninon of Sue Area Energency. C1195-il. 42 NRC 48 (1995) 10 C F R 50.5 sancuons agamst emplo)ws for engagmg in discrmunatory conduct toward employa whisileblowers; DD-9517,42 NRC 62 (1995) 10 C I R. 50 7 discrmunanon agamst bcensee employee for remng safety concerns; DD-95-20. 42 NRC 106 (1995) employee suspenson as wolaimo of. DD-9516. 42 NRC 60 (1995), DD-9517, 42 NRC 6162, 66 (1995) 10 Cf.R. 50 21(a) hcensmg requereness for perfornung nrdical therapy si research reactor. DD-9535. 42 NRC 40 n36 (1995) 10 C F R 50 47(axi) { reasonable assurance hadmg on adequacy of energency planmng for nuclear power plam heensmg; DI19514, 42 NRC 16 (1995) 4 weight given to federal Energency Managenent Agency 6ndmg on adequacy of energency planmng for nuclear s.ower plani hcensmg; DD-95-14, 42 NRC 16 (1995) 10 CJ R 50 %q) energency plan requeremem for hcensmg nuclear power plaras. DD-9%I4. 42 NRC 16 (1995) 10 C F R. 50 %sxt) deadhne for subnusman of state and local energency plans; Dn95-14, 42 NRC 16 (1995) 10 CFA 50 55a inservice inspecuon programs, hcensee obhgatmn to implenent. DD 95-18. 42 NRC 73 (1995) 10 C F R 50 55 adam 2) and (3Hi) d approval of core shroud reper as ahernative to reqmrenems of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code; DD-95 t9. 42 NRC (1995) 10 Cf R 50.55afgi hcensee reporung reqmrenwnts for inservwe inspecunn programs; DD 9518. 42 NRC 75 (1995) 10 C F R 50 59 1 design defects a boshng water reactor fuel pool coolmg systems, DD-95!8. 42 NRC 70 (1995) i 10 C F R 50 63 statmo blackoat vulnerahihty at pilgnm, DR9%I9, 42 NRC 90 (1995) 10 C F R 50 64 Imuts on use of high-ennched uratuum in research reactors. LBP 9514. 42 NRC 6 (1995) 14 i i [ ?

a 4 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS l 10 Cf R, 70.4 de6 muon of Sue Area Enrrgency; CU-95-II,42 NRC 48 (1995) 10 C.F R. 71 Dib) junsection over pacLaging and transpananon of ra&oadive nwenals; DS95-15. 42 NRC 43 a 43 (1995) 80 C.F.R.150.20 suspennon from pwucapanon in heensed activaues in NRC junnheimn. LBP 95-16, 42 NRC 101,102 (1995) 10 C.F.R Part 50. Appends A Cntenon 63 drugn defects in bahng water reactor fuel pool coohng syswens; DD-95-18, 42 NRC 70 (1995) 10 CI R. Part 50. Appendia B, Cosenon III design defects in bahng water reactor fuel pool coohng sysiems; DD-95-18,42 NRC 70 (1995) 10 CER. Part 50, Appemba R cnagency hghi marmenamw mihout a work order: DS95-17,42 NRC 62 (1995) 10 C.F R. Part 100 Appendas A, ilu dc6 muon of " capable fault"; DD-95-15,42 NRC 38 a.33 (1995) 44 C F R. Part 350 Faleral Energency Management Agency review and approval autimney over nuclear power plant emergency plans: DD 9514,42 NRC 1617 (1995) l 1 I i i i j i l i 15 i j I i l I

, _ _ - _.. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _... _ _ _ _.. _ _. _.. _. _ _.. _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _. _ _.. _ _. _........ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _. l t { l \\ I i i i I 4 l i i i i I i l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTf3 j I i l Atonuc Energy Act.161b. 42 U.S.C. 220l(b) l licensing board approval of settlenrne agreements; LDP 95-16, 42 NRC 102 (1995) l Atorme Energy Act, 1610, 42 U.5 C, 2201(o) licensing board approval of settlement agreernems; LBP 9516, 42 NRC 102 (1995) Energy Reorganszanon Act of 1974. 206 thnification of defecf5 in Bafety-related equipnent; DD-95-13, 42 NRC 10 (199$) j Energy Reorgamution Act of 1974. 210/214 l creatum of har of empknees who filed complaints as disenmination; DD-95-20, 42 NRC 107 (1995) l l l ) i l i I i l 1 I ( [ i i l i, i f { 17 t l. l 4 i v

... - _..-.-..- -..... -..._ - - -- - -..~ - f l ( t l 1 i i i i SUBJECT INDEX l i i i ALARA PRINCIPLE l challenges so; DD-9515, 42 NRC 20 (1995) ATTORNEY CLif.NT PRIVILEGE l apphcabihty to secretary's commumcanon to employer; LBP-95-15, 42 NRC 51 (1995) docurnent cordarmng a simple report of facts; LSP 95-15, 42 NRC 51 (1995) BYPRODUCT MATERIALS LICENSE debberate nuconduct. sanction for; LBP-9516, 42 NRC 99 (1995) CONTA!NMEbrT i hardened netwell veni system venting of radioactive efnuents in atmosphere; DD 95-19. 42 NRC 78 I (1995) CONTENTIONS f admsssibihty standards in hcense renewal proceedings; CLI-9510. 42 NRC I (1995) l CORROSION See Intergranular Stress Corrosmn Cracbog r DEFINITIONS " capable fault"; DD-95-15, 42 NRC 20 (1995) I componen "devianon" or " defect"; DD-95-13, 42 NRC 9 (1995)

• falure to comply"; DD-9513, 42 NRC 9 (19/5)

"NRC heensed acovities"; IJIP-9516. 42 NRC 99 (1995) l DISCOVERY l secretary's communicauon to her employer, LBP 9515,42 NRC 51 (1995) stay of; CLI-9510. 42 NRC 1 (1995) i DISCRIMINATION l against heensee employees for ransmg safety concerns; DD-95-16, 42 NRC 57 (1995), DD-95-17, 42 i NRC 61 (1995) l heenue creation of hst of employees who 6 led complaints as DD-95 20,42 NRC 105 (1995) DOSE whole-body, at site t'oundary of research facihty, CLI-95-il, 42 NRC 47 (1995) l DRYWELL hner corrosion vuhrrabihty at Pilgnm; DD-95-19, 42 NRC 78 (1995) i EARTHQUAKE ZONES capabir facilts ricar Georgia Tech research reactor; DD-9515,42 NRC 20 (1995) EMBRTITLEMENT i { safety class reactor internal components; DD-95-18, 42 NRC 67 (1995) EMERGLNCY PLANNING ZONE i i research scactor: DD-95-15,42 NRC 20 (1995) EMERGENCY PLANS research fanhty using special nuclear masenals; CLI-95 il,42 NRC 47 (1995) i I i state and local government 6nannal capabihues for implementation; DD-95-14. 42 NRC 15 (1995) I EMPLOYEES l Se-8 icensee Employees ENFORCEMLNT See Notice of Enforcemers Discrebon 1 i, s t t i 3l l 1 i F 1 3 4 4.~

SUBJECT INDEX + IQUIPMLNT. SAf1TY-RLLATID maintenance without a work ceder, D49517,42 NRC 61 (1995) nonficanon of defects sa; DR95-15,42 NRC 9 (1995) EVACUATION highway closure conceens, DD-9514,42 NRC 15 (1995) anne for rewarch facihty; CL1-95 II, 42 MRC 47 (1995) FIRE specut nuclear matettals mvolved in. CLI-95 II, 42 NRC 47 (1995) I'UEL rescanh reactor convernon from high-enncied urwuum to low ennched uramum, IEP-95-14, 42 NRC 5 (1995) FUEL RODS corrosma vulnerabahry at Pilgnm Statmn; DD-9519,42 NRC 78 (1995) INSPECTION. licensee inservice programs; Dl>9518, 42 NRC 67 (1995) INTLRGRANULAR STRLSS CORROSION CRACKING sofevy< lass reactor imernal cornponents. DD 95-18,42 NRC 67 (1995) JURISDICTION nwmcipal authoney over NRC regulated facihues; DD 9515, 42 NRC 20 (1999 LICINSLE EMPIDYLf3 discnnunauon aganst, for ramms safety concerns; DD-9516,42 NRC 57 (1995); DD-9517,42 NRC 61 (1995); DI195-20, 42 NRC 105 (1995) LICENSLES responsibsbry to implemens inservice inspecnon program, DD-95-18, 42 NRC 67 (1995) MAINTENANCE without work orkrs; DIA9517, 42 NRC 61 (1995) MATLRIA13 LIC1NSE See Byproduct Marenals License MONITORING airtorne radiological releanes from researth reactor DD-9511, 42 NRC 20 (1995) NOTICE OF l'Ni-ORCEMENT DISCRETION NRC pohcy on DD-95-19,42 NRC 78 (1995i NOTIFICAllON defects in safety-relasco eqmpment, Di>9513, 42 NRC 9 (1995) NUCl, EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION suthonry to review Department of Labor suits and Equal Employnem Opportumty complums. DS9520,42 NRC 105 (1995) OLYMPlc GAMES phyncal secun*y at research reactor during; CLI 95-10, 42 NRC 1 (1995) OPLRATING LtdNSE RENEWAL PROCI1 DINGS contenhon adnusutubtv standards; CLI-95-10, 42 NRC l (1995) PARTS substandard or coumerfeit DD 9519, 42 NRC 78 (1995) l PHYSICAL SICURITY research reacht during Olympic Gates, CLI 95-10,42 NRC I (1995) PRIYil1GE See Anorney<hent Pnvilege QUALITY ASSURANCE for fuel pool coonng s3sicm durms loss 4(coolant acca&m/ loss of offuse power: D&95-19,42 NRC 78 (1995) RADIATION SAitTY OF11CIR suspensson froen partscapanon m nuclear industry; LBP-95-16. 42 NRC 99 (1995) i 20 t e .y

SUBJECT INDEX RADIOACTIVE IJT!JJENTS vennog imo atmosphere-DD-9519. 42 NRC 78 (1995) RADIOACTIVE REEASLS ALARA prmeiple; DS95-15, 42 NkC 20 (1995) RADIO 1JDGICAL CONTAMINATION soil and wgetarms around research reactor. D&9515, 42 NRC 20 (1995) REALTOR CORE shrouds. structural imegnty of; D&95-19, 42 NRC 78 (1995) RLACIDRS internal componess, embnnlemrat and craclung of, DD-9518, 42 NRC 67 (1995) safery related imemal componems. age related detenoranon of. DD 95-19, 42 NRC 78 (1995) wwer-level andscator anomahes dunas controlled depressunzanon: D&9519,42 NRC 78 0995) See also Research Reactors RLMAND physacal secunty corneauon for reconsideranon; CLI-95-10. 42 NRC 1 (1995) RESEARCH LABORATORY Sue Area Emergency apphed to; ClJ 95-il. 42 NRC 47 0995) RESEARCH REACTORS emergency planmag zones; D&9515,42 NRC 20 (1995) i fuel conversson from bagh<nnched uranrum to low-ennched uraruum. LBP-9514, 42 NRC 5 (1995p phyncal secunty dunng Olympic Games; CLI-9510, 42 NRC i 0995) radiok>secal contarmnanun from; DD-9515. 42 NRC 20 0995) RUES OF PRACTICE anorney.chent privtirse apphed to secretary's corrcumcanon to employer; ISP-9515, 42 NRC 51 (1995) standmg to amervene in infornud proceedings, bans for; LBP-9514. 42 NRC 5 0995) SAhlTIONS suspensson from participauon m nuclear industry; LBP-9516, 42 NRC 99 (1995) SECURfTY See Physical Secunty SEWER SYSTEMS isolasmn of research reactor sysiems from-DD95-15,42 NRC 20 0995) SHOW CAUSE PROCEEDINGS standard for mantution of, DD9514. 42 NRC 15 0995) STTE AREA EMLRGLNCY apphcanon to research laboratory; CLI95-11, 42 NRC 47 0995) SPiflAL NUCLEAR MATLRIALS fue envolvms, CLI-9511,42 NRC 47 0995) SPLNT l'UEL POOL coohng sysicm quahry assurance, DD-9519. 42 NRC 78 0995) tmie-so-bal calculanons: DD-9518, 42 NRC 67 0995) STANDING TO IVflRVLNE paracapanon in earhes proceedmg as l'asas for; LBP-9514. 42 NRC 5 0995) STATION BLACKOLTT vulnerabihty as Pilgnm DL19519,42 NRC 78 0995) STAY housekeeping. of discovery; CL1-9510, 42 NRC 10995) TRANSMITTERS Rosemount-manufactured, has of fill-mi in. DD 9519, 42 NRC 18 0995) shelf-hie knutatmns of sensor-rell fill-oil. D&9513. 42 NRC 9 0995) TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATEklALS junsdicuon over. DD-9tl5. 42 NRC 20 0995) 1 21 i I i

SUBJECT INDEX URANIUM highm%d cometted to low <nnched. LBP-95-14. 42 NRC 5 (1995) VALVES nunor opersed. wn6 canon of capabihty of DD-95-19,42 NRC 78 (1995) WHIST 11BLDWLRS haassnent and imumdacon for reung safety concerna, DD-95 20, 42 NRC 105 (1995) suspennon for raung safety concerna. DD-95-16, 42 NRC 51 (1995); DD95-17. 42 NRC 610995) d ? h

t I l I l FACILITY INDEX GEORGIA TECH RE$EARCH REAGOR, Atlanta, Georgia; Docket No. 54160 OPERATING LICENSE MODirlCATION, July 31,1995; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Intervention Pention); LDP-9514,42 NRC 5 (1995) OPERATING LICENSE RENEWAL; July 26, 1995, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CLI-95-10,42 NRC I (1995) I RLQUEST FOR ACTION; July 31. 1995; PARTIAL DIREGOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. t 6 2.206; DD-9515, 42 NRC 20 (1995) MILISTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Unat I; Docket No. 50 245 REQUEST FOR AGION, August 2,1995; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 62.206; DD-95-16,42 NRC 57 (1995) MIL 13 TONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50 245, 50-336 f REQUEST FOR ACTION; August 2,1995. DIREGOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CT R.12.206; j j DD-9517,42 NRC 61 (1995) OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; Ducket No. 54219 I RLisvt.ST FOR ACTION; August 4,1995; PARTIAL DIRECOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R. 6 2.206, DI)95-18, 42 NRC 67 (1995) PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Docket No. 50 293 REQUEST FOR ACTION August 31, 1995. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.12.206; DD-95-19, 42 NRC 78 (1995) l SAN ONCIRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, Umts 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 54 361, 50-362 l REQUEST FOR AGION, July 24, 1995; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206; DD.9514, 42 NRC 15 (1995) VOGTLE ELEGRIC GENERATING PLAN 1, Umts I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-424-OLA-3, 54425-OLA 3 OPERATING LICLNSE AMENDMENT; August 3,1995; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Request for Discovery Concerning Ester Dison). LBP-95-15, 42 NRC 51 (1995) WA1TS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, Docket Nos 50-390. 50 391 REQUEST f 0R AGION, Septeinher 13. 1995; DIREGOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CIR. 5 2.206, DD 95-20. 42 NRC 105 (1995) l I r l a 1 i l i j 1 1 i i { 1 i.}}