ML20094P410

Applicant Exhibit A-37,consisting of Excerpts from IEEE Trial Use Std Re General Guide for Qualifying Class One Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations

ML20094P410
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/1992
From:	INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS
To:
References
CIVP-A-037, CIVP-A-37, NUDOCS 9204080097
Download: ML20094P410 (8)

Text

- _ .

y APCo Exhibit 37 60-3 Y 8 36 9' M A 0005931 2 zo[L tnKgLg uawkc IEEE No 323 April 1971

'92 tiAR 13 P 4 28

~n. -

"i

3 [ ; .

.b IEEE Trial-Use Standard: General Guide for Qualifying Class I Electric Equiprnent r

for Nuclear Power Generating Stations O Sponsored by the Joint Committee on Nuclear Power Standards ofthe IEEE C1aup on Nuclear Science and the IEEE Power Society b

Superseded by IEEE Std 3231974, Feb 26,19' 4 r Copyrisht 1971 by 5

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Enzincers. Inc.

6 b

f .% part of this pubiscornon mov he reproduced en any (ntm.

sn on tiertroner retr e n 'em or othera ase.

synthout the preer nsntter a unue of the puhlusher 9204080097 920220 PDR ADOCK 05000348 0 PDR ,

_-_a----

.t ens 4 g Diht No. L' / 't m v -,r e [.a arn.1 lhM Nn.Mr ha,PsaM

, wrnu,,l 3/ p.nt.k/>:h a

_ m - J u p, nap e a

• Tgonr

_ _ _ _ _ a a n>. _ _. _

l ': ' s ';l

_ _ DC[ h 3:(.(

, roaer ._

sc -y

/' .q t o

('

O 3

O

n.

0065932 Foreword In the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 50) the Atomic Energy Commission requires each applicant for a license to operate a nuclear power generating station to provide: *'A preliminary analysis and evaluation of the design and performance of structures, systems, and components of the facility with the objective of assessing the risk to public health and safety resulting from the operation of the facility and including determination of the adequacy of structures, systems, and components provided for the prevention of accidents and the mitigation of the consequences of accidents". The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers has developed this document to -

provide guidance for demonstrating and d5 ' tmenting the adequacy of electric equipment used for the=e purposes (Class I Electric Equipment).

Adherence to this guide may not suffice for assuring public health and safety because it is the integrated performe.nc.: of the structures, fluid systems, the instrumentation systems, and the electric systerns of the station that limits the consequences of accidents. Each applicant has the i responsibility to asrure himself and others that this guide,if used,is pertinent to his application ,

and that the interrated pcrformance of his station is adequate.

Guidance for demonstrating the capability of specific equipment may be found in the .ollowing documents which are in preparation:

f.

Proposed GWde for Type Tests of Modules Used in Nuclear Power Generating . Stations Protection Systems. JCNPS/SC2.1

-(

Proposed Guide for Type Tests of Class I Motors Installed Inside the Containment of Nuclear Power Generating Stations,JCNPS/SC2.2 _

Proposed Guide for Type Tests of Class I Valve Actuators Installed Inside the Containment of Nuclear Power Generating Stations, JCNPS/SC2.3 .

Proposed Guide for Type Tests of Class I-Cables and Connections Installed Inside the Containment of Nuclear Power Generating Stations. JCNPS/SC2.4

Prwaosed Guide for Seismic QuaDication of Class I Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, JCNPS/SC2.5 Proposed Application Basis Criteria for Class 1 Flectric Equipment fer Nuclear Power Gener '

ating Stuions, JCNPS/SC2.6 Proposed Guide for Seismic Qualification of Class I Switc; tear and - .tchgear Assemblies for

. Noel:ar Power Generating Stations, JCNPS/SC2.7 Proposed Guide for Seismic Qualification of Class I Transformers for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, JCNPS/SC2.8 --

It is planned that the above documents will be apptr ved as IEEE Standards and adopted as American National Standards.

?

~~

F

-n - --

-h 1.:a.is:-bwa bAos AYAvramenmanus ;e 0065933 Acknowledgment w

The Institute wishes to acknowledge its indebtedness to those who have so freely given of their time and knowledge and who have conducted the theoretical and experimental work on which this publication is based. This document was prepared by Subcommittee SC2 - Equipment Qualification - of the IEEE Joint Committee on Nuclear Power Standards and approved by the JCNPS. At the time of final subcommittee approval. the members were:

' Alfred 1. Simmons. Chairman J. F. Bates SC.2 Equipment Qualification "J. T. B auer

' Robert L. Ferguson, Past Chairtua . f' j',

• 3, SC.2 Equipment Qualification

• F. W. Chandler

• Charles V. Fields. Chairman W. J. Denkowski SC.2.0 General R. J. Flaherty. Jr.

W. J. Foley

• Louis D. Test. CF airman SC.2.1 Protection Modules ,['C ML 8m SC.2.5 bismic g, g,

• Walter G. Stiffler. Chairman C. F. Miller SC.2.2 Motors W. H. Steigelman J ' M'

• Walter A. Ste..stowski. Chairman SC-2.3 % alve Actuatoi, E ' b" rt E. K. Duffy

• John B. Gardner. Chaittaan C. E. Corley

. SC.2.4 Cables L. J. Savio

• Pnnespel A e thers eith es darome: *

/

Approved February 4.1971 IEEE Standards Committee B. B. Barrow Chairman S. I. Sherr. Secretary S J. Angello J. Forster R. H. Rose, II .

E. C. Barne J. A. Goet: S. V. Soanes F. K. Becker A. D. H asley L. Van Rooij W. H. Cook G. E. Hertis R. V. Wachter W. H. Devenish A. R. Hileman B. O. Weinschel C. J Essel H. Lance C. E. White R. F. Estoppey D. T. Michael W. T. Wintringham J. B. Owens m

O'

7-0065034 f Table of Contents SECTION - PAGE

1. Scope. , <

5

2. Purpose. . . 5-

. 3. Definitions . , . . 5

4. Qualification = . , - 5 5 Method and Documentation. . 6-5.1 General. . , . .- . . . . . . . . 6 5.2 Type Test . Data.. .. . .. . . . 6 5.3 Operating Experience . Data. . . . . 6 5.4 Analysis . . . . 6 5.5 Extrapolation 6.

S 6. Modifications. .

Notice of Trial Use.

Comments on this Triduse Standard'are ~

welcomed- and should be addressed to the '

Secretary. IEEE Standards Committee. 345 l

East 47th Street. New York, N.Y.10017.

l After a trial use period of approximately'one year. the Grcup responsible for this document j will prepare a revision and submit-it to the I' ' Standsrds Committee for approval as a full.

I status standard.'

I L

, -. , ,m._ . _ _ . . _ . _ . . ..........u...-,_.m.. rz . . - , . . _ . - .m..... -

1 e

0065935 IEEE Trial-Use Standard: General Guide for (a3 Qualifying Class I Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations

. 1. Scope ises to the conclusion concerning specific ca.

• pabilities of equipment and its adequacy for a This document describes the basic re- particular application.

quirements for the qualificaticn of Class I service conditions. Environmental. power and electric equipment. This is equipment which signal conditions expected as a result of nor-ts essential to the safe shu*down and isolation mal operating tmuirements. expected ex-of the reactor or whose tatlure or damage

nes in operating requirements and post-could result m sigmficant release cf radio-ulated conditions appropriate for the design active material. basis events of the station.

type tests. Tests made on one or more units to y

-. Purpose verify adequacy of design.

The purpose of this document is to provide Other definitions related to this document f guidance for demonstrating the qualifications

• d:r

EkEbe fo d b9 Criteria for Nuclear Power of elecifical equipment as required m the

, Generating Station Protection Systems.

IEEE Std 279 - Criteria for Nuclear Power .

IEEE Std 308 - Criteria for Class IE Electric

- Generating Station Protection Systems, and Systems f r Nuclear Power Generating Sta-IEEE Std 308 - Criteria for Class IE Electric "I "

' Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Sta-

] tions.

The qualification methods described may f

./

be used in conjunction witn the Guides (v. 4. Qualification qualifying specific types of equipment. (see The qualification of Class ! Electric Equip-Foreword), for updating qualification follow-ment shall include:

ing modifications or for qualifying equipment s for which no applicable Guide exists. 4.1 Identification of the Class ! Electric Equipment being qualified.

3. Definitions 4.2 Preparation of equipment specifications adequete for the application.

9 The definitions in this Section establish the 4.3 Demonstration that the equipment or meanings of words in the context of their use components thereof are capable of meeting in this Guide. performance specifications under the service qualification. Demonstration that equipment conditions. Type tests which simulate the meets design requirements, service conditions are preferred for this dem.

onstration. When size or other practical re-auditable data. Techm. cal information which quirements limit or preclude type tests, the z is documented and organised so as to be

demonstration may be made by

f readily understandable and traceable to inde- 4.31 Augmenting partial type tests by pendently verify mferences or conclusions analysis o- operating experience, or both.

based on these records. 4.3.2 Analysis or operatinit experience. or operating experience. Accumulation of veri- both, that clearly demonstrate the required fiable service data for conditions equivalent to capability.

g those for the equipment to be qualifi-d. 4.4 Pieparation of documentation te permit anclysis. A process of mathematical or other an independent evaluation of the equipment (n)

'a logical reasoning that leads from stated prem- qualifieation.

5 A

_ _ _ - - _ _ ___ _ 1

V r-~.

j i

0065936

5. Method and Docurnentation 5.1 General. The quall'ication method shall 5.3 Operating Experier ce Data. Operating ex-establish that each type of equipment is quali. perience data used to demonstrate the quali-fled for its application. The documentation fications of equirnent shall be pertinent to I shall include: the application requirements, the application and organized in an auditable Ii the equipment specifications and data from form.

the qualification method used. The operating experience data shall con-5.2 Type Test Data. Type test data used t tain:

demonstrate the qualification of equipment

, 5.3.1 Specifications for the equi; ment to be shall be pertinent to the application and or- qualified.

i ganized in an auditable fortn. 5.3.2 The specifications of equipment for The type test data r. hall contam.: which operating experience is available.

5.2.1 The equipment specifications. 5.3.3 Identification of the specific features 5.2.2 Identification of the specific features to be demonstrated by operating er.perience.

to be demonstrated by the type test. 5.3.4 Comp tison of past application and 5.2.3 The test program outhne. Typically .

specifications w th the new equipment specifi-this test outh,ne meludes: cations for each feature identified above.

5.2.3.1 The service conditions and design . . 5.3.5 Summary and source of opuating ex-basis event conditions to be simulat6d. perience applicable to equipment quali-5.2.3.2 The variables to be measured in- I5. 6. The basis on which the data have

,. cluding accuracy.

5.2.3.3 The number, type and location .

been determined to be suitable.

of test monitoring sensors for each variable.

5.4 Analysis. The data used to support the 5.2.3.4 The static and dynamic perform- qualification of equipment by analysis shall ance characterides* be pertinent to the application and organized 5.2.3.5 The special conditions to be ap-b plied, for example, larse sicnals, extreme pow-in an auditable form. The data shall be presented as a step by step description, so er supply voltages, fire, wat* i. tismic forces

• persons reasonably skilled in this type of anal.

radiation, chemical sprays. ' '

g ysis can follow the reasoning as well as the

.j 5.2.3.6 The ras.ge. sequence, and com-computations. The data shall contain:

g binations of environment to simulate the de- 5.4.1 The equipment specifications.

sign basis event conditions.

L 5.4.2 The interface or boundary conditions j 5.2.3.7 The squipment mountings re- of the equipment.

levant to performance.

5.4.3 The specific features, postulated fail-

l 5.2.3.8 The cable connections and other ure modes, or the failu

ce effects to be an-

. required appurtenances. ggygeg, 5.2.3.9 Acceptance criteria.

5.4.4 The assumptions, empirically derived 5.2.4 The test results (for each test) values, and m athematical models used togeth-5.2.4.1 Objective.

er with appropriate justification for their use.

5.2.4.2 Equipment usted-5.4.5 Description of analytical methods or 5.2.4.3 Test facility at.d instrumentation computer programs used, with traceability records.

5.2.4.4 Test procedures, 5.4.6 A summary of analytically atab-lished performance .haracte.istics.

5.2.4.5 Test data and accuraco 5.4.7 Approved signature and date.

5.2.4.6 Summuy. conclusions and ree-ommendations. 5.5 Extrapolation. Where the type test data or 5.2.4.7 Approved signsture and date. operating experience data have been extra-5.2.5 Supporting data. potated. the basis for the extrapolation sb .ll

, 5.2.6 Approved signature and date. be included.

m

V c., . .

! 0065937

6. Modifications

.OJ' ment qualification. This evaluation shall in.

' Each modification to the equipment or to dicate whether or not re qua'.ification is re-the equipment specification made subsequent quired. The analysis or data and evaluation to the start of the type test or beginning of the that demonstrates the effect cf the modi-cperating experience reporting period shall be fication on equipment performance shall be evaluated to determine its effect on the equip- added to the qualification documentation.

1 i

h I

j e

4 C

3 I o

i li e i'

. h.

a it l

i i i I

7-i

. . - - _ . - - _ _ - - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ -