ML20094L282

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Addendum to Tech Specs Change Request 184,revising F* Distance Definition to State Total F* Distance Including EC Measurement Uncertainty & Adding Paragraph to Basis for Section 15.4.2, ISI & Testing..., Per 951113 Telcon W/Nrc
ML20094L282
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/1995
From: Link B
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20094L284 List:
References
VPNPD-95-091, VPNPD-95-91, NUDOCS 9511200145
Download: ML20094L282 (2)


Text

_. - -~ - . ~. .-

.e Wisconsin Electnc POWER COMPANY 231 W Michgan. PO Box 2046. Mihaukee VA 532GI-2046 (414]221 2345 VPNPD-95-091 -

10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.90 November 16, 1995 i

I Document Control Desk U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Mail Station P1-137 Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301 ADDENDUM TO EMERGENCY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE REOUEST 184 INCORPORATION OF F* STEAM GENERATOR TUBE REPAIR CRITERION POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 On November 9, 1995, we submitted Technical Specifications Change Request 184, " Incorporation of F* Steam Generator Tube Repair Criterion." In a telepnone conference on November 13, 1995, your staff requested slight modifications to the wording of our proposed Technical Specification changes.

First, your staff requested that the eddy current uncertainty used for verifying the F* distance be reflected in the Technical Specifications. We will. revise the F* distance definition to state the total F* distance including eddy current measurement uncertainty. We will also add a paragraph to the Basis for Section 15.4.2, " Inservice Inspection and Testing of Safety Class Components," to clearly indicate the length of roll required to maintain tube integrity requirements and the value of eddy current measurement uncertainty.

Second, your staff requested that the parenthetical statement in the proposed definition of an F* tube be deleted. This statement implied that signs of degradation in the F* region were limited to indications of cracking.- We will delete this statement.

Last, your staff requested that the location from which the F*

distance was measured be included in the Technical Specifications.

This information will be included in the definition of the F*

distance.

Marked-up Technical. Specification pages which reflect the requested modifications are enclosed.

ObhCg; 9511200145 951116 PDR ADOCK 05000266 g i p PDR I ksubsnmWHhawinEneasCw;nrathn \

I i

s .

Document Control Desk l November 16, 1995 Page 2 We have reviewed the safety evaluation and no significant hazards determination included in our November 9, 1995, submittal and have determined that they apply to this addendum.

If you require additional information, please contact us.

Sincerely, l

Bob Link Vice President Nuclear Power KVA/jg Attachment cc: NRC Resident Inspector NRC Regional Administrator

)

l J