ML20094J008

Fire Endurance Evaluation of Thermo-Lag Barrier in Fire Zone CB-1f

ML20094J008
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	10/19/1995
From:	Scott Wilson ILLINOIS POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20094H993	List: ML20094J005 ML20094J008 ML20094J012 U-602512, Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re Thermo-Lag Installations
References
IP-M-0340, IP-M-0340-R01, IP-M-340, IP-M-340-R1, NUDOCS 9511150047
Download: ML20094J008 (59)

Text

!

1 CALCULATION COVER SHEET SaEET i Or 40 TITLE / DESCRIPTION: DEPT /DIV CALCULATION NO.

l FIRE ENDURANCE EVALUATION OF THERMO-LAG FIRE BARRIER IN FIRE ZONE CB-1f. QUALITY SYSTEM CODE TOPlc BLDG /ELEV/ AREA RELATED (or NA) (or N A) l (Q or N)

. O XD H98 CNTRD62 i l

l APPROVALS - NAME/ SIGNATURE /DATE CORP PREPARING REVISION VOLUME READY FOR INCORPORATION:

PREPARED BY Simon R. Wi} son THIS REv.

1. I "#

10/11/q5 $ _ _ TL.{ d DATE $1GNATURE " CONFIRMATION REQUIRED MICROFICHE ATTACHED:

YES NO PAGE NO(s) YES / NO I CHECKED BY Brian T. Ford p , gf g g . '" VOL. INCORP. ASSGNMNT. Not Applicable DATE r baNAns' MOD. NA ECN NA CR NA OM ENTS: MWR NA REVIEWED BY Brian T. For PRINT I NRC GL 92-08 10/19o,6

^

[

81GNATuRE REVISION VOLUME READY FOR INCORPORATION:

CORP PREPARING PREPARED BY Tills REV. YES NO N/A Pk1NT

' MICROFICHE ATTACHED:

brE ,,c, reki.

CONFIRM ATION REQUIRED l l YES NO PAGE NO(s) l l YES l l NO 1

CilECKED BY PklNT VOL. INCORP. ASSGNMNT.

' CR DATE MOD. ECN uaNarust COMMENTS: MWR REVIEWED B' PklNT

^

,r l /

ch DATE SIGNATURE w

~~

REVISION VOLUME READY FOR INCORPORATION:

3 CORP PREPARING THIS REV.

d., PREPARED BY YES NO N/A Z PRINT

/ /

MICROFICHE ATTACHED:

Dart sicNATukE CONFIRMATION REQUIRED YES NO d YES b NO PAGE NO(s)

CHECKED BY PRIVI VOL. INCORP. ASSGNMNT.

/ /

DATE sioN aTuRE MOD. ECN CR COMMENTS: MWR REVIEWED Bi PklVT

/ / ,_

DATE SIGNATukE 9511150047 951103 PDR ADDCK 05000461 P PDR

CALCULATION COVER SHEET SnEEThF 2re o w aisem(

TITLE / DESCRIPTION: DElrr/DIV CALCULATION NO.

M/NSED IP-M-0340 FIRE ENDURANCE EVALUATION OF THERMO-LAG FIRE BARRIER IN FIRE ZONE CB-1f. QUALITY SYSTEM CODE TOPIC BLDC/ELEV/ AREA RELATED (or NA) (or NA)

(Q or N)

- O XD H98 CNTR/762 APPROVALS - NAME/ SIGNATURE /DATE ARING REVISION VOWME READY FOR INCORPOWlON:

PREPARED BY Si M o N S% CORPynv ,

a fqfy $ _ k M , IP O NA l l YES l lNO lX lN/A CHECxED BY B t.in A T & D mwmmemme MON AUAGED:

I !yEs l X l NO PAGE NO(s) YES X NO

' Moo. no rum ar,cm,rwu sew w ma, COMMENTS:

REVIEWED BY_. h R.!Ad T N G l1 / \ /94 ,

%,Y ,

j b N [. 8 HAT NRC GL 92-08  !

APPROVED BY (2! I / 9tt l PREPARED BY H REV J l YES lNO l lN/A MICROFICHE ATTACHED:

CONFIRMATION REQUIRED CHECKED BY

! l YES l l NO PAGE NO(s) YES NO

/ /

COMMENTS: " " J""^" * *"'"""*^)

REVIEWED BY l

/ /

APPROVED BY

/ /

b c

• f PREPAREDBY H YES NO N/A CONFlRMATION REQUIRED

. MICROFICHE ATTACHED:

CHECKED BY I l YES l YES NO l NO PAGE NO(s)

/ /

" "J "" ^" C" "C" '"*C * *^'

COMMENTS:

REVIE%T,D BY

/ /

APPROVED BY

/ /

l Page 3 of 40 l

\

REVISION HISTORY Dept./Div. M/NSED Calc. # IP-0340 i

Revisipn 01 ,Volume (if applicable) NA i i

Objective: To provide _cleareLand more detailetiinformaliDILIRQarding results of the NEl Hose Stream test. and_ l in corr'ect editorial errors.

l Reason: it is understood that the reference to NEl-Test Renort 2-10 would entail the results of the Home Stream '

l Test since this is nart of the test nian. However. haced nn ouestions asked hv the NRC regarding Hnse Stream - i Test:it was determined that this subiect needed to be addressed in more detail in the calt nlatinn.

List of Affected Pages: A LL .

Revision Volume (if applicable)

Objective:

I I

Reason:

List of Affected Pages:

i Revision Volume (if applicable) l l

Objective:

l Reason: .

1 I

List of Affected Pages:

i l

NF-303 (10/95) l

.i

~

. NSED/Desien & Anvivsis/Thermo-Lau Project ' IP-M-0340 R/l Page 4 of A O i

T.ABLE OF CONTENTS i

SEICTION PAGE REV.1 COVER SHEET ' I l1 REV. O COVER SHEET 2

' REVISION HISTORY 3-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 l.0 OBJECTIVE 5 1

2.0 DEFINITIONS 5 3.0 ASSUMPTIONS 5-6 4.0 METHODOLOGY 6

5.0 REFERENCES

6-7 6.0 EVALUATION / ANALYSIS 8-10 6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION 11-17 6.2 C2E CONTROL CABLE TRAY EVALUATION 18-27 6.3 K2E INSTRUMENTATION CABLE TRAY EVALUATION 28-37 7.0 JUSTIFICATION ANALYSIS 38-40 8.0 RESULTS / CONCLUSIONS 40 A'ITACHMENTS:

A) AS-BUILT CABLE TRAY CONFIGURATION THAT IS PROTECTED ( 2 pages)

BY THERMO-LAG 330-1 FIRE BARRIER (The original installation drawings were marked up for this cale. to show additional dimensional details)

B) APPLICABLE INSTALLATION DETAILS FROM VENDOR MANUAL K-10003-0002 AND BISCO INSTALLATION MANUAL ( 7 pages)

C) THERMO-LAG MATRIX (EXCERPT FROM REFERENCE 2) ( 1 page) l J

D) TABULATION OF CABLE PROTECTED BY THERMO-LAG IN FIRE ZONE Cb-If ( 8 pages)  ;

E) RECORD OF COORDINATION ( R O C ) Y-104476 ( l page) l chifrev l

- ._ -. -- ,-~ . -- . . - . - - . . . - . - ~ - - . - - - - - - .

9 NSED/Desien & Anaksis/Thermo-Lac Proicct IP-M-034n R/l

't Pa::e $ of 4o

! 1.0 OBJECTIVE:

i As noted in NRC Generic Letter 92-08 and 92-08 Supplement 1, Thermo-Lag 330-1 firewrap material produced by Thermal Science, Inc.( TSI), has repeatedly failed to meet the J manufacturer's claims with regard to fire rating. Additionally, baseline qualification tests I

performed by TSI have been discredited due to lack of pertinent detail and testing QA control.

Subsequent tests of Thermo-Lag have been performed for Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) which have the necessary controls and configuration details, and these tests provide very detailed installation drawings and temperature data which can be used to determine a minimum expected fire endurance rating ofinstalled Thermo-Lag.

The purpose of this analysis is to qualify the minimum expected fire endurance rating of the Thermo-Lag fire barrier system installed on cable trays P2E, C2E, and K2E in CPS Fire Zone CB-lf. The original design intent was to provide a 3-hour rated fire barrier for these trays.

2.0 DEFINITIONS

1. Exposure fire - A fire initiated and propagated by eme fuel source other than the referenced item.

2. Maximum allowable temperature limit - From Reference 6, similar thermocouples are allowed to rise an average of 250 F above ambient. and any one thermocouple is allowed to rise 325 F above ambient.

3. Reference 1 defines industry terms applicable to Thermo-Lag.

4. Reference 2 defines CPS-specific terms applicable to Thermo-Lag.

5. Reference 3 defines CPS-specific Safe Shutdown Methods.

3.0 ASSUMPTIONS

1. Where exact determination of commodity or barrier parameters cannot be accomplished without barrier dismantling, the more-limiting value for the parameter is assumed.

These individual assumptions area identified as such in the evaluation sections.

2. As documented in CPS Thermo-Lag turnover packages, certain parameters were inspected by QA personnel upon installation. These parameters will be assumed to be unchanged from their inspected status when no other source (i.e., design, walk down document, etc.) can positively determine the parameter's value.

cblisev m

NSED/Desien & Analysi#Thermo-Lac Project IP-M-0340 R/l Page. b of 4 o J'

3.0 ASSUMPTIONS (Continued)

~

3. Although the Vendor Manual states that the prefabricated Thermo-Lag 330-1 used at CPS contained V-Ribs at 6" centers, it is not possible to verify this statement without destructive examination, it is therefore conservatively assumed that V-Ribs are not used in the CPS installation.

4.0 METHODOLOGY

1. Define individual fire barrier system segments of the subject item.

2. For each individual fire barQr system segment of the subject item, use the .

methodology from Refewnce I to perform a detailed comparison of as-installed parameters from Reference 2 to as-tested parameters from References 4 & 16.

Determine the minimum fire endurance rating of each fire barrier system segments by i limiting parameter, where the rating is the time just before the measured temperature- i exceeds its maximum allowable limit. 1 l

3. Determine the minimum fire endurance rating of the fire barrier system for this item by the limiting segment.

]

5.0 REFERENCF3

1.0 NSED Standard ME-09.00 Rev. I dated 7/27/94, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Endurance Application Guide" , Nuclear Energy Institute.

2.0 U-602250, Illinois Power's Response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 92-08, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers," dated 2/9/94.

3.0 NSLD Calculation CL-FP-SS-1 Rev. 2, Identification of Safe Shutdown Systems, dated 1/21/86.

4.0 NEI Test 2-10, Fire Endurance Test of Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Protective Envelope (Two 24 in. Aluminum Cable Tray and Two 6 in. Aluminum Cable Tray Assemblies),

Omega Point Laboratories, dated April 11, 1994.

5.0 NSED Calculation IP-M-0182 Rev. 2, Heat Content Values for Cable Insulation (SLICE cable trays and free-air).

6.0 ASTM El19-88, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, American Society for Testing and Materials.

, cblDev

NSEDmesien & AnalnisfrhermmLne Proicct IP-M n340 R/1 Page]of40 5.0 REFERENCE (Continued)

7. B-Line Systems, Inc. Catalog No. CT3 (1990), Cable Tray Systems.

8.0 USAR Appendix F Section 3.1.1.

9.0 BISCO Report 748-79 ( Fire Test Embedded Conduit Sleeves), dated May 31,1983.

10 Vendor Manual K-10003-0002 [ BISCO- Fire Barrier ( Thermo-lag) Installation],

Rev.0, dated 8-14-91.

I1 K-2999 Electrical Installation Specification, amendment 15, 05-30-86.

12 BISCO - Turn over package for CB-If Fire Zone in Control Building, elevation 762'-

0" , dated 04-18-86.

13 S&L Calculation: SD-Q45-00DG02, Rev. 0 (Cable Tray-Construction Loading) for weight of cable tray plus T-Lag wrapping.

14 S&L Calculation: SD-Q45-00DG02, Rev. 4 (Fire Proof Wrap Detail & Panel Weights) 15 K-2980 Cable Tray and Supports Amendment 6,04-25-86.

16 Sandia Report SAND 94-0146, " An evaluation of the Fire Barrier System Thermo-Lag 330-1", printed September 1994 17 AISC Manual of Steel Construction,7th edition.

18 Record of Coordination ( R O C ) Y-104476, " Telephone conversation dated November 14 and 21 1994 between R.P. Bhat and S. R. Wilson ofIPC with Mr. C.

Banning of Vectra", Attachment E.

19 FECN 11720, K2944-0002, Typical masonry wall details drawing A21-1062 Rev.H.

20 ME-08.00 Rev. O "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Combustibility Evaluation Methodology Plant Screening Guide".

cbt frev

NSED/Desien & Analuis/Thermo-Lar Project IP-M-0340 R/l Page f6 of 40 l

6.0 EVALUATION / ANALYSIS:

Thermo-Lag Barrier System: P2E (Division 2 Power), C2E (Division 2 Control), and K2E (Division 2 Instrumentation) Cable Trays and associated thermal shorts (includes supports).

Location: Fire Area CB-1, Fire Zone: CB-If, elevation 762 feet 0 inch, Division 1 cable trays are located on the southwest side of the zone. Division 2 cable trays are routed along the north wall 39 feet from the Division 1 trays, and Division 2 cable risers are found along the south wall 19 feet from the Division 1 trays. All or some of these trays contain safe shutdown cables.

Purpose of Thermo-Lag: In order to separate the Division I shutdown cables from those of Division 2, and preclude the possibility of a fire destroying both Division 1 and 2 cables that serve safe shutdown equipment.

Division 2 cable trays were protected with a material that has a 3-hour fire rating. ,

i Basis: In order to preclude the possibility of a fire destroying both i Division I and 2 cables that serve safe shutdown equipment, the  !

Division 2 cable trays were protected with a material that has a 3- I hour fire rating.

An automatic wet-pipe sprinkler system was installed around the west pipe hatch to prevent hot gases from propagating to elevation 825 feet 0 inch (Fire Zone CB-li).

Several walkdowns of the accessible areas in Fire Zone CB-lf revealed that the structural integrity of the fire barrier wrappings on cable trays P2E, C2E, and K2E appear to be intact.

I Cable Trav Application ( Procedure No. SP-FBI-01 Rev. 3 date.d 3-28-86. ref. I1)

This is a description of the installation method used to install the principal commodity (i.e., j Fire Barrier for Cable Tray) at CPS.

Installation of the Thermo-Lag prefabricated panels to cable trays involved cutting the number of sections required to form the Fire Barrier from one or three hour fire rated Thermo-Lag ,

Prefabricated Panels, forming the Fire Barrier sections by making 90 degree bends, and than i mounting the sections on the cable tray to be protected using 14 ga. minimum stainless steel tie wire or 0.75x0.025 inch minimum Stainless Steel banding material. ,

l l

I cbtfrev

NSED/ Design & Anahsis/Thermo-Lac Project IP-M-0340 R/l Page Q of 4{o .

4 6.0 EVALUATIONS / ANALYSIS (Continued) l l

Th'e one hour design consists of an inner layer of Thermo-Lag Stress Skin Type 330-69 and an outer layer.of 0.500 inch minimum dry film thickness of the Thermo-Lag 330-1 Subliming Material.

l The three hour design consists of an inner layer of Thermo-Lag Stress Skin Type 330-69, a center layer of 1.00 inch minimum dry film thickness of the Thermo-Lag 330-1 Subliming Material, and areuter layer of Thermo-Lag Stress Skin Type 330-69. This was the material used in the CP.S 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rated installations. j The forming of the fire barrier sections is accomplished using one of several methods. Three

-and four sided one piece sections are formed by scoring, in the case of one hour fire rated l panels, or by cutting a "V" groove, in the case of the three hour fire rated panel, along the l lines where bends are to be made and then making the required 90 degree bends. The sections l are then completed by tying or banding the sides together and filling in the scored or "V" cut  !

corners with Thermo-Lag 330-1 Subliming Trowel Grade Material.  ;

t

~

In the other alternative method, individual top, bottom and side pieces are either butt or miter cut from the one or three hour fire rated panel and are then tied or banded together. The' i seams and joints of the section are then filled using Thermo-Lag 330-1 subliming trowel grade j material.  :

I i

l l

l

(

cbl&cv  !

NSFD/Desien & Analuis/ncrmo-Lae Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Page(ooft{O l 6.0 EVALUATIONS / ANALYSIS (Continued)

The applicable commodity tested, its fire resistive barrier construction and its tested acceptance l basis are as described in Reference 4 and are tabulated below: j Commodity Fire Resistive Barrier Test Acceptance Basis Tested Construction -

24" x 4"' 1 in. (nominal) V-rib panels with Satisfactory bare conductor ,

Aluminum Ladder pre-buttered joints (4 piece design), temperatures when test stopped at Back with Radial V-ribs parallel to tray rails on top 86 minutes. Raceway temperature Bend and bottom of tray. Separate requirements exceeded at 86 (4 piece design) mitered panel pieces on inside and minutes, through openings in outside face of radial bend. barrier developed. Following the (Tray A) Baseline application with no Hose Stream test no additional upgrades applied. openings were observed, most of the Thermo-Lag pieces remained affixed and the stainless steel i banding was sagging slightly. I 24" x 4" I in. (nominal) V-rib panels with Bare conductor temperatures Aluminum Ladder pre-buttered joints. Score and fold requirements exceeded at 85 ,

Back with Radial single panel for bottom and sides minutes when barrier opened. j Bend on horizontal and vertical tray Raceway temperature requirements  !

(Score & Fold) segments with separate top panel, exceeded at 86 minutes, through V-ribs parallel to tray rails. openings in barrier developed.

(Tray D) Separate mitered panel pieces on Following the Hose Stream test no {

inside and outside face of radial additional openings were i bend. Baseline application with no observed, most of the Thermo-Lag ,

upgrades applied. pieces remained affixed and the l stainless steel banding was sagging I slightly.

The Reference 16 Test Report describes fire endurance and ampacity derating tests performed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) under the sponsorship of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). These tests evaluated Thermo-Lag 330-13 hour rated fire barrier cladding system. Four test articles were tested and evaluated, each of the test articles was based on a "U"-shape section of cable tray protected by a nominal three hour protected envelope, comprised of two layers of nominal 1/2" thick Thermo-Lag 330-1 prefabricated panel sections. This SNL Test Report was reviewed against the CPS 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rated fire barrier installation on fire zone CB-lf, however, it was concluded that NEI Test Report 2-10 offered similar or more comparative characteristics than the SNL test.

cbt frev

l' NSED/Desien & Anahsisfrhermo-Lau Proicct IP-M-n340 R/l Page ll of 40 6.0 EVALUATIONS / ANALYSIS (Continued)

Comparative characteristics under consideration in this determination were in the areas of :

cable tray size (12" wide SNL, 24" wide NEl, 24" & 36" wide CPS), contents / total enclosed mass (<8 #/ft. SNL, > 12 #/ft. NEI, >14 #/ft. CPS) material type (two %" thick panels SNL, 1" thick panel NEI,1" thick panel CPS), orientation ("U" shape horizontal orientation SNL, "L" shape horizontal & vertical orientation NEI, horizontal & vertical orientation CPS), and fastener type (stainless steel tie wire SNL, stainless steel banding and wing seals NEI, stainless steel banding and wing seals CPS).

6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION:

1. Evaluation of segments CBIFP2E-01, CBlFC2E-01, and CBlFK2E-01.

Identification of Unique Segment for P2E Cable Tray in CB-If Fire Zone (See sketch on Attachment A, page 1 ).

Segment ID Segment Description CB1FP2E-01 24" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,18'-0" straight vertical run, from the floor at El. 762'-0" to the ceiling at the bottom of floor EL781*-0" in the Control Building. Two wall supports F1 and F2.

Floor penetration CB-762-15-5178 and ceiling penetration CB-781-03-5008.

500MCM ground strap, total coverage of one layer of 3 hr. rated preformed i conduit 5" max unsupported span. ,

Identification of Unique Segment for C2E Cable Tray in CB-lf Fire Zone (See sketch on Attachment A, page 1 ).  ;

Segment ID Smment Description CBIFC2E-01 24" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,18'-0" straight vertical run, from the floor at El. 762'-0" to the ceiling at the bottom of i floor EL.781'-0" in the Control Building. Two wall supports F1 and F2.

Floor penetration CB-762-15-5178 and ceiling penetration CB-781-03-5008. l Identification of Unique Segment for K2E Cable Tray in CB-lf Fire Zone (See sketch on Attachment A', page 1 ).

Segment ID Segment Description CBIFK2E-01 24" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,18'-0" straight vertical run, from the floor at El. 762'-0" to the ceiling at the bottom of floor EL.781'-0" in the Control Building. Two wall supports F1 and F2.

Floor penetration CB-762-15-5178 and CB-781-03-5008.

These three segments are evaluated as one combined segment, due to the construction of the fire protective barrier installation.

cbt frev

NSED/Desien & Anahsis/Thermo-Lac Project IP-M-0340 R/l Page {2.of 4 0 6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued)

This combined segment consists of three vertical runs of 24" wide cable tray risers (see attachment B page 1), protected / wrapped by a three sided Thermo-Lag 330-1 enclosure bolted to a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rated concrete wall to form a complete fire protected barrier enclosure.

The following is a more detailed description of the installation procedure utilized for this enclosure, this information was extracted from the Reference 10 vendor instruction manual:

A three sided and flanged section is cut from three hour rated prefabricated panels, the minimum Dange _ width is to be 5" to accommodate concrete fasteners. ,

The side pieces are mounted to the cable tray using 14 ga. minimum stainless i

steel tie wire or 3/4" x .025" minimum stainless steel banding material. For l multiple cable tray enclosures as in this case, the side pieces are mounted to the

! outermost cable trays only.

I l

! The flanged pieces are Danged to the wall using approved concrete fasteners

~

installed per BISCO procedure SP-103 at a maximum of 12" intervals.

The concrete fasteners are of sufficient length to ensure 3/4" penetration.

SufGcient amounts of Thermo-Lag is applied to cover the bolt heads of the concrete fasteners with the minimum envelope thickness of 1".

The front pieces to the cable trays are mounted using 14ga. minimum stainless steel tie wire or M" x .025" minimum stainless steel banding material ( banding was used in these installations). The maximum spacing of the bands do not exceed 12". For multiple cable tray enclosures as in this case, the front is banded to each cable tray separately.

Additional side, front and Danged pieces are attached to the previously installed pieces by precoating the edges with 330-1 Thermo-Lag trowel grade material and butt joining them together at their ends. The installation is completed by filling in the edges and joints with Thermo-Lag 330-1 subliming trowel grade material.

. The CPS con 5guration / installation described above was not specifically tested, however, a comparison can be made to the configuration tested (Ref. 4, NEI 2-10 Test Report) by comparing the similarity between the thermal and structural attributes.

chifrev

.- . . - ~ . . ..- - .. .. - .-

NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo-1,ae Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Page13or4O l I

6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued) l Segments: Cil!FP2E-01 CillFC2E-01 Cili FK2E-01 Commodity Description CPS Installatkm NEI 210 Test Commodity Comparison.

Parameters Report B= Bounded B/J= Bounded with ,

justification.

Size . Cable Tray Width Three 24" 24" B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)  ;

Material S = Steel S A B (Lower thermal capacity &

A= Aluminum higher thermal conductivity of Aluminum)

Contentsfrotal Raceway WT: LBS/LF P2B = 6.20 2.94 l Enclosed Mass C2E= 6.20 K2E= 6.20

('able WT: LBS/LF P2E= 43.436 9.80 C2E= 54.600 K2E = 1.024 -

Total Weight LBS/LF => = 117.66 12.74 B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)

Orientation H = Horizontal V V (Thermocouples B .

V= Vertical 191-193, 207-209,  ;

287-289, & 303-305 Material Type PPV- Prefabricated Panels PPF (Assumed) PPV B/J1 (see page 15) {

(V-Rib) ,

1 PPF= Prefabricated Panels (Flat) l A' A B (R O C. Y-104476 ) J Material A = 1.00" + .25-0 Thickness A' = 1.00" min. ( Attachment. E.)

Stiffeners (V Rib) A/B . None (Assumed) 1/ PAR B/J1 (see page 15) location / A =l = Internal V-Ribs Orientation E= External V-Ribs )

B = Perp= Perp. to Tray rails PAR = Parallel to Tray rails Stress Skin NA= No Stress Skin B B B Location  != Internal E= External B= Both Faces joint Type A/B PRB/B Tray A=> PRB/B B A = PRB = Prebuttered PB = Post Buttered PRB/SF.B Tray D=> PRB/SF,B B = B = Butt Joint (Flanged Area)

SF= Score & Fold M = Mittered Joint Gap Size Flush Flush B (

Unsupported Dimension of Boxed 24" 24" B Barrier Spans Commodities internal Support P= Prebanding P Tray D=> P B Mechanism S= Shims (Thermo-Lag) Tray #=> Non cbifrey -

l NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo-1,an Proiect IP-M-0340 R/1 Page%of40 6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued)

Segments: CillFP2E-01

• i ClllFC2E-01 CillFK2E-01 Commodity Descriptkm CPS Installation NEl 2-10 Test Commodity Comparison. i Parameters Report B= Bounded B/j= Bounded with justificathm.

Fastener A/B B/ M "x0.025" B/%"x0.020" B i Size / Material A = B = Bands W= Tie Wires  :

S= Staples B = Size Fastener Spacing Distance between fasteners 12" 12" B (Max)

Fastener Distance Distance of Fastener from 2" 2" B l From Joints Butt Joints I Structural N = No Coverage T (includes T B Support and 9=9" Rule ground strap)

Intervening steel 18=18" Rule Protection T= Total Coverage Boxed Enclosure C1 = Concrete 1 Side CI' N/A B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)

Location

2. Evaluation of Segments CBlFC2E-02 and CBlFK2E-02.

Identification of Unique Segment for C2E Cable Tray in CB-lf Fire Zone (See sketch on Attachment A, page 1 ).

CBlFC2E-02 36" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,11*-9" straight vertical run, from the floor at El. 762"-0" to F21 wall support at El 773'-

9", Floor penetration CB-762-15-5028. l'O steel ground conduit thermal short wrapped for approximately 9 linear feet,18" min. coverage from the protective envelope.

Aux. steel (TS 10x2xl/4)(Ref. FECN 11720) covered with 3 hr. fire proofing material "Cafcote 560*,in accordance with UL design no. D902, i total coverage intervening steel Identification of Unique Segment for K2E Cable Tray in CB-If Fire 7ene (See sketch on Attachment A, page 1 ).

CBIFK2E-02 24" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,11'-9" straight vertical run, from the floor at El. 762'-0" to F21 wall support at El. 773'-

9" , Floor penetration CB 762-15-5028. l'O steel ground conduit thermal short wrapped for approximately 9 linear feet.

Aux. steel (TS 10x2xl/4) (Ref. FECN 11720) covered with 3 hr. fire proofing material "Cafcote 560",in accordance with UL design no. D902, total coverage intervening steel These two segments are evaluated as one combined segment, due to the construction of the fire protective barrier installation.

cbirrev

l i

NSED/Desien & Analvsis/Thermo-Lne Project IP-M-0340 R/l Pcge G of 4 O 6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued)

This combined segment consists of two vertical runs of cable tray risers , one 36" wide and the other 24" wide (See Attachment B page 2), protected / wrapped by a three sided - ,

Thermo-Lag 330-1 enclosure, bolted to a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rated concrete wall to form a complete i fire protected barrier enclosure.

( See proceeding item 1 discussion for further detail ). 1 Segments: CBIFC2E-02 f CBIFK2E-02 i Commodity Description CPS Installation NEl 2-10 Test Commodity Comparison. '

Parameters Report B= Bounded B/J= Bounded with Justification.

Size Cable Tray width 36" and 24" 24" B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)

Material S = Steel S A B (Lower thennal capacity  ;

A= Aluminum & higher thermal j conductivity of Aluminum)

• Contents / Total Raceway WT: LBS/LF C2E= 7.93 2.94 B Enclosed Mass K2E = 6.20 Cable WT: LBS/LF C2E= 68.036 9.80 B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)  :

K2E = 3.899 Total weight LBS/LF == = 86.065 12.74 B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16) orientation H= Horizontal V V (Thermocouples B l V= Vertical 191-193, 207-209, 287-289, & 303-305 a l

Material Type PPV = Prefabricated Panels PPF (Assumed) PPV B/J 1 (see page 15) )

i (V-Rib)

PPF= Prefabricated Panels l (Flat)

Material A = 1.00" + .25-0 A' A B (R O C. Y 104476 )

Thickness A' = 1.00" min.

Stiffeners (V Rib) A/B None (Assumed) 1/ PAR B/J1 (see page 15) location / A =l= internal V. Ribs orientation E = External V Ribs B = Perp=Perp. to Tray rails PAR = Parallel to Tray rails  !

Stress Skin NA= No Stress Skin B B B 1 Location  != Internal l E= External B= Both Faces Joint Type A/B PRB/B Tray A=> PRB/B B  ;

A= PRB= Prebuttered PB= Post Buttered PRB/SF,B Tray D== ]

B = B = Butt Joint (Flanted Area) PRB/SF,B ,

SF= Score & Fold i M = Mitered l Joint Gap Size Flush Flush B Unsupported Dimension of Boxed C2E= 36" 24" B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)  ;

Barrier Spans Commodities K2E = 24"  !

cbifrev

..- - -. - - - _ . - . . - - - .- . - - . . . ---. - . _ . . . - ~ _ - _ - _ _

NSED/Desien & Anahsis/Thermo-Lau Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Page go of 9 0 6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued)  !

, Segments: CIII FC2E-02

• Cill FK2E-02 i Commodity Description CPS Installation NEl 2-10 Test Commodity Comparison.

Parameters Report B= llounded l Illj = Bounded with i justification.

Internal Suppon P= Prebanding P Troy D=> P B ,

Mechanism S = shims (Thenno-Lag) Tray A=> Non Fastener A/B B/ % "x0.025" B/%"x0.020" B ,

Size / Material A = B = Bands W= Tie Wires S= Staples l B = Size Fastener Spacing Distance between fasteners 12" 12" B (Max)

Fastener Distance Distance of Fastener from 2" 2" B From Joints Butt Joints Structural N = No Coverage T (suppon),18" T B, testing has demonstrated Suppon and 9 =9" Rule for 1" O steel that intervening steel Intervening steel 18 = 18" Rule ground conduit, members protected for 18" Protection T= Total Coverage from the prota.ctive envelope adequately prevent significant  !

heat conduction into the protective envelope.

Boxed Enclosure C1 = Concrete 1 Side Cl N/A B/J2 (see pages 15 & 16)

Location l

B/J1 The location on the top and bottom of the tray is where orientation of V-Ribs is most f critical from a structural view point. When structurally comparing configurations where '

the V-Ribs are oriented parallel to the tray run with configurations where the V-Ribs i have been pounded out, under similarjoint supporting conditions ( i.e., support on the tray rails on the top of the tray, or by the groove joints / stress skin at the bottom of the tray), it is concluded that these configurations are structurally equivalent, because the I

Thermo-Lag panel will have the tendency to bend along the weakest link which is the area of the panel where the V-Ribs is absent (flat area).

B/J2 The size of the three sided box formation used to wrap the combined cable tray segments CBlFP2E-01, C2E-01, and K2E-01 is approximately 84" wide by l'-6" deep, and for CBlFC2E-02, and CBIFK2E-02 it is approximately 66" wide by l'-6" deep. However the maximum unsupported span that is produced by this configuration is 22" and 34" respectively.

i This is due to the buding criteria specified in the Ref.10 Vendor Manual i.e., " for multiple cable tray enclosures, the front is banded to each cable tray". Additionally prebanding of the side pieces is utilized for added structural rigidity (see Attachment B pg.1 & 2).

sbt fiev

NSED/Desien & AnainMFhermo-Lac Proicct IP-M-034n R/l Page l] of 4 O 6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued) l This prebanding and because the electrical installation speciGcation requires a cover over all the instrumentation cable trays (K2E's) and a cover. extending 12' up from the floor on the Power (P2E) and Control (C2E) cable tray risers, produces further support and ensures the structural rigidity of the CPS installation.

1 In Reference 4 (NEI Test 2-10), openings were noticed on the bottom and on the i outside bottom of the radial bend of Tray A, and a large opening was present on the outside bottom of the radial bend in Tray D as the stainless steel bands had broken and ,

a section of barrier had fallen into the furnace. The thermocouples installed in the l areas of barrier breaches were the ones that exceeded the temperature criteria at 86 )

minutes. These thermocouple numbers are 292,293, and 309. Based on the location of these thermocouples, no comparison is made to the segments (i.e., CB1FP2E, C2E,

& K2E-01 and 02) under evaluation in this calculation, because thermocouples 292,293, and 309 are located in the radial bend area, while the segments under evaluation are vertical oriented segments.

No barrier breach was noted in the areas (thermocouple 191-193, 207-209, 287-289, and 303-305) under consideration in this evaluation, following the hose stream test no additional opening were observed. Since the test was terminated at 86 minutes into the test due to barrier breach in a region of the tested trays where the configuration transitions between differing construction techniques at radial bends (i.e., separate

" mitered" panel pieces) it is reasonable to deduce that the vertical segments of the trays (i.e., thermocouples 191-193,207-209 on tray A, 287-289, and 303-305 on tray D) of the trays would have remain within the temperature criteria of the test for a much j longer duration, it is therefore conservative to conclude that the installed configuration l which is a straight vertically constructed barrier is bounded by the NEl Test 2-10 in i size and unsupported span and that the structural and thermal integrity of these segments is acceptable.

The various other critical attributes of the three sided box formation are justified below per comparison to the tested attributes and engineering judgments:

a. The little slots made in the Thermo-Lag panels to accommodate the banding and prebanding are very small, and are covered / filled with Thermo-Lag subliming '

trowel grade material of sufficient envelope and thickness to make it comparable to the "V" groove and/or butt joint formations of the Ref. 4 NEI tests.

b. The bolting of the flange pieces to the wall insures the integrity of the joint between the flange and box side pieces. This joint is further protected by the Thermo-Lag pieces that form a two sided box around the bolt heads. The bolts on the flange pieces are subjected to negligible forces (tension or shear) due to the vertical  ;

orientation of the flange pieces and because they are sandwiched between the top and bottom horizontal flanges.

chifrev

_ __ _ . . ~ ._ - _. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l NSED/Desien & Analvsis/Thermo-Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Page @ or 40 j l

6.1 COMBINED CABLE TRAY SEGMENTS EVALUATION ( Continued)

Hence the structural and thermal integrity of these attributes are conservatively l supported by the test until temperature criteria were exceeded at 85 minutes.

6.2 C2E CABLE TRAY EVALUATIONi CB1FC2E-03 36' wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,2'-6" short straight vertical run, with a vertical radial bend, from wall support F21 at El. 773'- .

9" to top of cable tray bend at El. 776'-3".

CB1FC2E-04 36" wide, 6" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom, straight horizontal runs and two horizontal lateral hends, hangers H63, H64, H65, H74, and H59. 1.5"O steel conduit (C0610) thermal short 4 linear feet coverage. 3"O i pipe (llA04A) thermal short 8 linear feet coverage.

CB1FC2E-05 36" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom, vertical radial bend,  ;

one wall hanger F19.

I 1

s l

l l

l i

chifrev

NSED/Desien & AnalysisfFhermo- Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Page I CT,of 4 o FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 Hr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBIFC2E-03 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UIlLIZED FOR EVALUATION (Ref:4)

COMMODITY TYPE Cable Tray 20ga Ventrib Cable Tray Ladder Back (B-Line Systems, Ladder Back tested tray bounds the See other parameters.

bottom (llusky Products Inc., Inc. catalogue No. 24A-09-24-144) installed solid ventrib bottom tray, due model PSX1) to lower thermal capacity, higher thermal conductivity and lower 3

structural integrity (Sx 1.44 in vs 2.0 in3) of the Ladder Back Tray.

COMMODITY SIZE 36" wide 24" uide Smaller tested tray size bounds larger 85 minutes -thermocouples 12" deep 4" deep tray due to lower thermal capacity, 292,293 & 309 exceeded louer thermal resistance, and larger temperature limits after 85 extemal surface area to thermal minutes.

capacity ratio.

NEI Test 2-10 Dermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 303-311 Tray D.

COMMODITY MATERIAL Steel, Pregalvanize, ASTM Aluminum Allov 6%3-T6 Aluminum tested cable tray bounds 85 minutes -thermocouples A-525-G90 installed steel tray due to lower 292,293 & 309 exceeded thermal capacity and higher thermal temperature limits aRer 85 conductivity of aluminum. NEl Test 2- minutes.

10 nermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295,303-311 Tray D.

COMMODITY CONTENTS Cable Tray = 7.93 #/ft Thermal mass ofinstalled See other parameters.

Cables = 68.036 (Atu D) configuration is greater than tested configuration, and is therefore Total = 75.966 J/ft Total = 12.74 #/R bounded, due to its higher internal thermal capacity.

COMMODITY ORIENTAllON Vertical straight run with Vertical straight run with vertical radial Same. See other parameters.

vertical radial bend. bend.

BARRIER TYPE nermo-Lag 330-1, one layer nermo-Lag 330-1, one layer preformed Same, except no V ribs. See other parameters.

preformed panel. 3 lir. rating. V-ribbed panel,3 lir. rating.

cblfrev. doc

i NSED/ Design & AnalysisTI'hermo- Lan Project - IP-M-0340 R/l Pare 2Oof q O r

FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 Hr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBIFC2E-03 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE ,

f PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION IJflLIZED F. <R EVALUAT10N( Ref:4)

Min.1.0" 1.0" Nominal ( l 0 40.250 -0.0) Installed Thermo-Lag is bounded by See other parameters.

BARRIER TIIICKNESS Max. unknown tested T.L since installed thickness is ,

at least same as test.  !

.( See R O C. Y-104476 )

The presence of V-nbs is V-Ribs, positioned parallel to run of cable The location on the top and bottom of See other parameters.

. BARRIER STIFFNESS V-RIB 4

unknown, and is therefore tray on top and bottom , and perpendicular the tray is where orientation of the V- l LOCATION & ORIENTAT10N to length of tray along sides of tray. ribs is most critical from a stmetural  !

assumed to be non-existent.

view point. Orientation parallel to the run does not add to the structural r capability df the wrapped system, hence the tested bounds installed since  ;

orientation parallel to tray is limiting.  !

Inside and outside faces of the Inside and outside faces of the panel. Same. See other parameters.

BARRIER STRESS-SKIN LOCATION panel. j Precoated edges with 330-1 330-1 T.L Trowel grade used to caulk all NE! Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191- 85 minutes -thermocouples i BARRIER JOINT TYPE Thermo-Lag trowel grade joints and seams beturen panels (Pre- 199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 292,293 & 309 exceeded material and butt joined at Buttered butt joints) on straight run 303-311 Tray D. temperature limits after 85 ends (Pre-Butteredbuttjoints) sections, and separate panel pieces on minutes.

on straight run sections, inside and outside face of radial bend.

2 and individual top & bottom and side pieces miter cut on radial bend.

BARRIER FASTENERS TYPE, #SC312SS,3/4" X .025" thick  %" wide Stainless Steel band 0.020" thick. Tested bounds installed in width, other See other parameters.

SPACING AND DISTANCE ,SS Banding with 204 SS wing wing seals,2" on each side of panel butt- parameters are same.  ;

FROM JOINT. seals, %"x.020" with %" uing joint at 12" interval seals #202SS 12" O.C. Max.

spacing,2" max spacing from joints. #304SS Bright  ;

Annealed Wire .0SO,14ga.

i cblfrev. doc

- _ , . , . . - . ..-- ve., , . ...-.....n, ..m , . - . . , . . - . - ,

NSED/ Design & AnalysisfThermo- Lar Paviect IP-M-0340 R/1 Pane 1k of 40  ;

t FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 Ilr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CB1FC2E-03 AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION UTILIZED COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMTMNG PERFORMANCE CONFIGURATION FOR EVALUATION ENDURANCE PARAMETERS Max. 34* across the bottom & Max. 22* across the bottom & top of the See section 7 for acceptance 85 minutes.

BARRIER UNSUPPORTED  !

SPAN top of the tray. tray. justification.

None specified in installation nis was a base-line test, no upgrades in Same. See other parameters. t BARRIER JOINT REINFORCEMENT or inspection details. the form ofjoint re-enforcement was performed.

lianger=> wrapped per detail One hour rated Dermo Lag 330-1 V- Same, except no V-ribs. See other parameters.

BARRIER STRUCTURAL AND INTERVENING STEEL 24 Attachment B, using 330-1 Ribbed Panel material, total coverage. No PROTECTION T.L subliming material l' intervening steel min. thickness from the point

( Ground Straps,Ilangers, Non- '

Dedicated Conduits, Fire Stops). where the hanger supports the cable tray all the way to the point the support attaches to the auxiliary steel , and extending so as to maintain an 18* coverage from cable tray envelope on the intenening steel. No intenening steel present.

l s i

i 1

P cblfrev. doc ,

b

i r

NSED/Desien & Analvsis/Thermo- Lae Proiect IP-M-0340 R/1 Pare 22 of 40 FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E

- FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762', 3 Hr. rating) ,

SEGMENTS: CBIFC2E-04 I

t PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATTON LIMITING ENDURANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUATION (Ref:4) i COMMODITY TYPE Cable Tray 20ga Ventnb Cable Tray Ladder Back (B-Line Systems, ladder Back tested tray bounds the See other parameters.  ;

bottom (ifusky Products Inc., Inc. Catalogue No. 24A-09-24-144) installed solid ventrib bottom tray, due model PSX1) to loww thermal capacity, higher thermal conductivity and lown .

' 3 structural integrity (Sx .44 1

in vs 2.0 in 3)of the Ladder Back Trav. ,

COMh10DITY SIZE 36" wide 24' wide Smaller tested tray size bounds larger 85 minutes -thennocouples '

6" deep 4" deep tray due to lowu thermal capacity, 292,293 & 309 exceeded lower thennal resistance, and larger temperature limits afler 85 i external surface area to thermal rninutes. i capacity ratio.

NEI Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191-  ;

199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 303-311 Tray D.  ;

i COMMODITY MATERIAL Steel,Pregalvanize ASTM Aluminum Alloy 6063-T6 Aluminum tested cable tray bounds 85 minutes -thermocouples  !

A-525-G90 installed steel tray due to lower 292,293 & 309 exceeded  ;

thermal capacity and higher thermal temperature limits after 85 t conductivity of aluminum. NEI Test 2- minutes.

10 Thermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295,303-31I Tray D.

COMMODITY CONTENTS Cable Tray = 7.93 #/t1 Thermal mass ofinstalled See other paraneters, Cables = 68.036 (Att. D) configuration is greater than tested [

> configuration, and is therefore  :

Total = 75.966 #/11 Total = 12.74 #/fl bounded, due to its higher internal thermal capacity. I COMMODffY ORIENTAT10N Horizontal, & Lateral radial Ilonzon'al, & Vertical radial bend. Bounded, Equivalent barrier and joint See other parameters.

bend. twe. i BARRIER TYPE Thermo-Lag 330-1, one laver Thermo-Lag 330-1, one layu preformed Same, except no V ribs. See other parameters.

preformed panel. 3 I(r. rating. V-r.bbed panel,3 lir. rating.

k k

4 cblfrev. doc I

NSED/ Design & Analysis /Thermo- Lar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Pane 2 S of .4 0 FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762',3 Hr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBIFC2E-04 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUATION ( Ref:4)

BARRIER 11HCKNESS Min.1.0" 1.0" Nominal, ( l .0 +0.250 -0 0) Installed Thermo-lag is bounded by See other parameters.

Max. unknown tested T.L, since installed thickness is at least same as test.

.( See R O C. Y-104476 )

BARRIER STlFFNESS V-RIB The presence of V-nbs is V-Ribs, positioned parallel to run of cable ~ The location on the top and bottom of See other parameters.

LOCATION & ORIENTATION unknown, and is therefore tray on top and bottom , and perpendicular the tray is where orientation of the V-assumed to be non-existent. to length of tray along sides of tray. ribs is most critical from a structural view point. Orientation parallel to the run does not add to the structural capability of the wrapped system, hence the tested bounds installed since orientation parallel to tray is limiting.

BARRIER STRFSS-SKIN Inside and outside faces of the Inside and outside faces of the panet. Same. See other parameters LOCATION panel.

BARRIER JOLVT TYPE Precoated edges with 330-1 330-1 TL Trowel grade used to caulk all NEI Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191- 85 minutes -thermocouples Thermo-Lag trowel grade joints and seams between panels (Pre- 199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 292,293 & 309 exceeded material and butt joined at Buttered butt jomts) on straight nm 303-311 Tray D. temperature limits aner 85 ends (Pre-Buttered butt joints) sections, and separate panel pieces on minutes.

on straight run sections, inside and outside face of radial bend.

and individual top & bottom and side pieces miter cut on radial bend.

BARRIER FASTENERS TYPE, #SC312SS, 3/4" X .025" thick  %" wide Stainless Steel band 0.020" thick, Tested bounds installed in width, other See other parameters.

SPACING AND DISTANCE ,SS Banding with 204 SS wing uing seals,2" on each side of panel butt- parameters are same.

FROM JOINT., seals, %"x.020" with %" wing joint at 12" interval.

seals #202SS 12" O.C. Max.

spacing,2" max spacing from joints. #304SS Bright Annealed Wire .080,14ga.

cbifrev. doc

V I

NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo- Lae Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Paee 24 of 40 ,

FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762',3 Hr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBlFC2E-04 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUAT10N LIMITING ENDURANCE PARANETERS CONFIGURATION IJflLIZED FOR EVALUATION BARRIER UNSUPPORTriD Max. 34" across the bottom & Max. 22" across the bottom & top of the See section 7 for acceptance 85 minutes.

SPAN top of the tray. tray. justification.

BARRIER JOINT Non-specified in installation or This was a base-line test, no upgrades in Same. See other parameters.

REINFORCENENT inspection details. the fonn ofjoint re-enforcement was performed.

BARRIER STRUCTURAL AND Hanger => wrapped per detail One hour rated Ihermo Lag 330-1 V- Testing has demonstrated that support See otl.er parameters.

INTERVENING STEEL 24 Attachment B, using 330-1 Ribbed Panel material, total coverage on and intervening steel members ,

i PROTECTION T.L subliming material 1* support steel- protected as described and installed at

( Ground Straps, llangers, Non- min. thickness from the point CPS adequately prevent significant ,

Dedicated Conduits, Fire Stops) where the hanger supports the heat conduction into protective cable tray all the way to the envelopes,(Ref.1.0 page 27).

point the support attaches to the auxiliary steel , and  ;

f extending so as to maintain an 18" coverage from cable tray ,

envelope on the intervening steel.

All intervening steel that penetrate the envelope was .

firewTapped a minimum of 18*  !

for a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire rating.

i i

I t

cblfrev. doc i

-- - _ . .- - _ _ . _ - _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - 1 ---- ._-.-- _ - --

NSED/ Design & Analysivrhermo Lar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Page b$ of 4 0 FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762", 3 lir. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBIFC2E-05 AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURADON(S) COMPARISON EVALUABON LIMIENG ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE PARAhERIRS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUADON (Ref:4)

Cable Tray 20ga Ventnb Cable Tray Ladder Back (B-Line Systems, Ladder Back tested tray bounds the See other parameters.

COMMODITY TYPE bottom (llusky Products Inc., Inc. catalogue No 24A4)9-24-144) installed solid ventrib bottom tray, due model PSX1) to lower thermal capacity, higher thermal conductivity and lower structuralintegrity(Sx1.44 in 3 vs 2.0  ;

in 3) of the ledder Back Tray.

85 minutes -thermocouples  !

COMMODITY SIZE 36" wide 24" wide Smaller tested tray size bounds larger 12" deep 4" deep tray due to lower thermal capacity, 292,293 & 309 exceeded lower thermal resistance, and larger temperature limits aner 85 [

extemal surface area to thermal minutes.

capacity ratio. l NEl Test 2-10 "Ihermo Couples 191- l 199,207-215 Tray A, and 287 295, 303-311 Tray D.

COMMODITY MATERIAL Steel, Pregalvanize, ASTM Aluminum Alloy 6063-T6 Aluminum tested cable tray bounds 85 minutes -thermocouples A-525-G90 installed steel tray due to lower 292,293 & 309 exceeded thermal capacity and higher thermal temperature limits aner 85 ,

conductivity of aluminum. NEl Test 2- minutes.

10 Thermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295,303-311 Tray D. E COMMODITY CONTENTS Cable Tray = 7.93 #/n Thermal mass ofinstalled See other parameters. ,

Cable _s = 67.867 (Att. D) configuration is greater than tested ,

configuratioa, and is therefore Total = 75.797 #/n Total = 12.74 #/n bounded, due to its higher internal ,

thermal capacity.

COMMODITY OlUENTADON Vertical straight run with Vertical straight run with vertical radial Same. See other gerameters.

vertical radial bend. bend  ;

BARRIER TYPE lhermo-Lag 330-1, one layer Thenno-Lag 330-1, one layer preformed Same, except no V ribs. See other parameters.

preformed panel 3 lir. rating. V-ribbed panel 3 lir. rating. ~

t t

cblfrev. doc i

NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo- Lan Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Pare 2 6ot 4 o

~t FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 lir. rating) '

SEGMENTS: CB1FC2E-05 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TES11ID CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION U11LIZED FOR EVALUATION ( Ref:4)

BARRIER TIIICKNESS Min 1.0" 1.0" Nominal,( l .0 +0.250 -0 0) Installed Thermo-Lag is bounded by See other parameters.

Max. unknown tested T.L. since installed thickness is at least same as test.

j .( See R O C. Y-104476 )  ;

BARRIER STIFFNESS V-RIB The presence of V-ribs is V-Ribs, positioned parallel to run of cable The location on the top and bottom of See other parameters.

LOCATION & ORIENTATION unknown, and is therefore tray on top and bottom , and perpendicular the tray is where orientation of the V-assumed to be non-existent. to length of tray along sides of tray. ribs is most critical from a structural view point. Orientation parallel to the ,

run does not add to the structural capability of the wrapped system,

• hence the tested bounds installed since orientation parallel to tray is limiting.  ;

BARRIER STRESS-SKIN Inside and outside faces of the inside and outside faces of the panel. Same. See other parameters.

LOCATION panel.

r BARRIER JOINT TYPE Precoated edges with 330-1 330-1 TL Trowel grade used to caulk all NEI Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191- 85 minutes -thermocouples  :

I Thermo-Lag trowel grade joints and seams between panels (Pre- 199. 207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 292,293 & 309 exceeded material and butt joined at Buttered butt joints) on straight run 303-311 Tray D. temperature limits after 85 ends (Pre-Buttered butt joints) sections, and separate panel pieces on minutes.  !

on straight run sections, inside and outside face of radial bend.

and individual top & bottom l and side pieces miter cut on radial bend. l BARRIER FASTENERS TYPE, #SC312SS, 3/4" X .025" thick  %" wide Stainless Steel band 0.020" thick, Tested bounds installed in width, other See other parameters.

SPACING AND DISTANCE ,SS Bandirg with 204 SS wing wing seals,2" on each side of panel butt- parameters are same.

FROM JOINT. seals, %"x.020* with %" wing joint at 12" interval.

seals #202SS 12" O C. Max. '

spacing,2" max spacing from joints. #304SS Bright Annealed Wire .080,14ga.

i cblfrev. doc

_ _ . . . . . - __s_.. __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ , ~ _ . . _ . - .. _. . . . - n , - .,

NSED/Desien & AnalvsisfFhermo- Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Parc M of q b FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: C2E FIRE ZONE: CD-If(Control Bldg EI. 762",3 Hr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBlFC2E-05 V

i PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION UTILIZED COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMmNG PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION FOR EVALUATION ENDURANCE BARRIER UNSUPPOR1ED Max. 34" across the bottom & Max 22" across the bottom & top of the See section 7 for acceptance 85 minutes.

SPAN top of the trav. tray. justification. ,

BARRIER JOINT None specified in installation This was a base-line test, no upgrades in Same. See other parameters.

REINFORCEMENT or inspection details. the form ofjoint re-enforcement uns performed '  !

BARRIER STRUCTURAL AND Hanger => wrapped per detail One hour rated Thermo Lag 330-1 V- Same, except no V-nbs. See other parameters, i INTERVENING STEEL 24 Attachment B, using 330-1 Ribbed Panel material, total coverage no PROTECTION T.L subliming material l' intervening steel.

( Ground Straps, Hangers, Non- min. thickness from the point Dedicated Conduits, Fire Stops). where the hanger supports the cable tray all the way to the point the support attacims to the auxiliary steel , and ,

extending so as to maintain an 18" coverage from cable tray l envelope on the intervening  ;

steel. No intervening steel  ;

t present.

i r

L cbifrev. doc c

- - - _ - _ - n ,-e-

- - , e r ~---- < - - a -- ---------

}

i NSEI)/I)csien & AnnIvsis/Thermo-I,ar Project IP-M-0340 R/1 'Page 7 Bof @

6.3 K2E CABLE TRAY EVALUATION:

i C81FK2E-03 24" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom,2'-6" short straight vertical run, with a vertical radial bend, from wall support F21 at El 773'-  ;

i 9" to top of cable tray bend at El. 776'-3". t CB1FK2E-04 24" wide, 6" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom, straight horizontal i runs and two horizontal lateral bends, hangers H63. H64, H65, H74, and l H59. 1.5"O steel conduit (C0610) thermal short 4 linear feet coverage. 3"O pir (llA04A) thermal short 8 linear feet coverage. 36". wide,6" deep cable tray (PIB) 4 linear feet coverage. 500 MCM ground strap 1.5 linear feet coverage. j CBIFK2E-05 24" wide,12" deep Cable Tray Ventrib (solid) bottom, vertical radial bend j length, one wall hanger F19. j Calculation of flat cover weight.18ga. (.0478") (Ref.15) x 24" wide ( uncoated sheet steel, i 490 #/ft3 ref.17,AISC,7th edition pg. 614),1.1472 in2 x 1 ft2 /144 in2 = 0.00796 ft2 x 490 i

1. /ft3 = 3.9 #/ft.

l 5

l l

l cbtfrev

NSED/Desien & AnalysisTThermo- Las Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Pare 2 Cf of 40 FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 lir. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBlFK2E-03 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURAT10N(S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUAllON (Ref:4)

COhoiODITY TYPE Cable Tray 14ga Ventrib Cable Tray Ladder Back (B-Line Systems, Ladder Back tested tray bounds the See other parameters.

bottom (llusky Products hic., Inc. catalogue No. 24A49-24-144) installed solid ventrib bottom tray, due model PSX1) to lower thermal capacity, higher thermal conductivity of the Ladder Back Trav.

CONSTODITY SIZE. 2 ** wide 24" wide Smaller tested tray size bounds larger 85 minutes -thermocouples 12" deep 4" deep tray due to lower thermal capacity, 292,293 & 309 exceeded lower thermal resistance, and larger temperature limits after 85 extemal surface area to thermal minutes.

capacity ratio.

NEl Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 303-311 Tray D.

COMMODITY MATERIAL Steel,Pregalvamze ASTM Alummum Alloy 6063-T6 Aluminum tested cable tray bounds 85 minutes -thermocouples A-525-G90 installed steel tray due to lower 292,293 & 309 exceeded thermal capacity and higher thermal temperature limits after 85 conductivity of aluminum. NEI Test 2- minutes.

101hermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295,303-311 Tray D.

COMh10DITY CONTENTS Cable Tray = 6.20 #/fl Thermal mass ofinstalled See other parameters.

Cables = 3.899 (Att. D) configuration is greater than tested cover = 3.900 configuration, and is therefore Total = 14.00 #/R Total = 12.74 #/ft bounded, due to its higher internal thermal capacity.

COMMODITY ORIENTATION Vertical straight run with Vertical straight run with vertical radial Same. See other parameters.

vertical radial bend. bend.

BARRIER TYPE Thenno-Lag 330-1, one layer Thermo-Lag 330-1, one layer preformed Same, except no V ribs. See other parameters.

prefonned panel. 3 lir. rating. V-ribbed panel,3 lir. rating.

cblfrev. doc

h NSED/ Design & AnalysisTFhermo- Lar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/I Pare 30 of q o I

FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E i FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 Hr. rating) r SEGMENTS: CB1FK2E-03 i

PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMfFING ENDURANCE -  ;

PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUADON( Ref:4)  ;

BARRIER TillCKNESS Min.1.0" 1.0" Nominal,( l 0 +0.250 -0.0) Installed Thermo-Lag is bounded by See other parameters. i

+

! Max. unknown tested T.L. since installed thickness is at least same as test.  ;

.( See R O C. Y-104476 ) l BARRIER STIFFNESS V-RIB The presence of V-nbs is V-Ribs, positioned parallel to run of cable The location on the top and bottom of See other parameters. l LOCATION & ORIENTATION unknown, and is therefore tray on top and bottom , and perpendicular the tray is where orientation of the V-  !

assumed to be non<xistent. to length of tray along sides of tray. ribs is most critical from a structural r view point. Orientation parallel to the ,

run does not add to the structural capability of the wrapped system, .i hence the tested bounds installed since l orientation parallel to tray is limiting.

BARRIER STRESS-SKIN Inside and outside faces of the Inside and outside faces of the panel. Same. See other parameters. ,

LOCATION panel.

l BARRIER JOINT TYPE Precoated edges with 330-1 330-1 T.L. Trowel grade used to caulk all NEI Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191- 85 minutes -thennocouples l Thenno-Lag trowel grade joints and seams beturen panels (Pre- 199,207-21$ Tray A, and 287-295, 292,293 & 309 exceeded  !

material and butt joined at Buttered butt joints) on straight run 303-311 Tray D. temperature limits aller 85 l 4 ends (Pre-Buttered butt joints) sections, and separate panel pieces on minutes.. I on straight nm sections, inside and outside face of radial bend.

and individual top & bottom ,

and side pieces miter cut on radial bend.

BARRIER FASTENERS TYPE, #SC312SS,3/4" X .025" thick  %" wide Stainless Steel band 0.020* thick, Tested bounds installed in width, other See other parameters.

j SPACING AND DISTANCE ,SS Banding with 204 SS wing wing seals,2" on each side of panel butt- parameters are same. l FROM JOINT. seals, %"x.020" with %" wing joint at 12" interval.  !

seals #202SS 12' O C. Max.

i.

spacing,2* max spacing from j joints. #304SS Bright Annealed Wire .080,14ga.  !

cblfrev. doc

____-_ --_ __--__ -_-____- _ ____-___ _+

P NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo- Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/I Pace 3 % of 40 FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E.

FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bl&g El. 762", 3 lir. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBIFK2E-03 PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION tmLIZED COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING PARANETERS CONFIGURATION FOR EVAL.UATION ENDURANCE I BARRIER UNSUPPORTED Max. 22" across the bottom & Max. 22" across the bottom A top of the Same. See other parameters.

SPAN top of the tray. tray. I BARRIER JOINT None specified in installation This was a base-line test, no upgrades in Same. See other parameters.

REINFORCEAENT or inspection details. the form ofjoint re-enforcement was performed. ,

BARRIER STRUCTURAL AND Hanger => wrapped per detail One hour rated lhermo Lag 330-1 V- Same, except no V-ribs. See other parameters.

INI'ERVENING STEEL 24 Attaclunent B, using 330-1 Ribbed Panel material, total coverage no  !

PROTECTION T.L subliming material la intervening steel.

( Ground Straps, Ilangers, Non- min. thickness from the point Dedicated Conduits, Fire Stops). where the hanger supports the cable tray all the way to the point the support attaches to the auxiliary steel , and extending so as to maintain an 18" coverage from cable tray envelope on the intervening steel No intervening steel present. i i

?

I 7

cblfrev. doc

.[,

i f NSED/Desien & AnalysisfThermo- Lae Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Pane 32. of 4 o  ;

~ ~

FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E -I FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld*g El. 762',3 Hr rating)

SEGMENTS: CB1FK2E-04  ;

.t AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITINO ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE _

PARAhETERS CONFIGURATION IJrILIZED FOR EVALUA'110N (Ref: 4)

Cable Tray 14ga Ventrib Cable Tray Ladder Back (B-Line Systems, Ladder Back tested tray bounds the See other parameters.

COMMODITY TYPE bottom (llusky Products Inc., Inc. Catalogue No. 24A-09-24-144) installed solid ventrib bottom tray, due '

model PSX1) to lower thermal capacity, higher thermal conductivity of the Ladder ,

Back Trav.

i 24" wide 24" wide Smaller tested tray size bounds larger 85 minutes -thermocouples l COMMODITY SIZE 6" deep 4" deep tray due to louer thermal capacity, 292,293 & 309 exceeded '

lower thermal resistance, and larger temperature limits aner 85 t

external surface area to thermal minutes.

capacity ratio.

NEl Test 2-10 Hermo Couples 191 I

I99,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, l'

303-311 Tray D.

Aluminum Alloy 6063-T6 Aluminum tested cable tray bounds 85 minutes -therri,vcouples Steel,Pregalvanize, ASTM l COMMODITY MATERIAL A-525-G90 installed steel tray due to lower . 292,293 & 309 exceeded thermal capacity and higher thermal temperature limits after 85 l conductivity of aluminum. NEI Test 2- minutes. j 10 Thermo Couples 191-199,207-215 [

Tray A, and 287-295,303-311 Tray D.

See other parameters. i COMMODITY CONTENTS Cable Tray = 6.20 #/ft Hermal mass ofinstalled '

Cables = 3.899 (Att. D) configuration is greater than tested cover = 3 900 configuration, and is therefore l Total = 14.00 #/R Total = 12.74 #/fl bounded, due to its higher intemal [

thermal capacitv. l COMMODITY ORIENTATION llorizontal, & Lateral radial Ilorizontal, & Vertical radial bend. Bounded. Equivalent barrier and joint See other parameters. I bend. twe.  ;

nermo-Lag 330-1, one layer Thermo-Lag 330-1, one layer preformed Same, except no V ribs. See other parameters.  ;

BARRIER TYPE preformed panel. 3 Hr. rating. V-ribbed panel, 3 lir. rating.

l  !

!i 4

i cb tfrev. doc [

t

4 NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo- Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/I Pare B of 4 o I

4 FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762',3 Hr. rating)

CBIFK2E-04 SEGMENTS: I PERFORMAhCE AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUADON LIMfrING ENDURANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUADON( Ref:4) l BARRIER THICKNESS Min.1.0" 1.0" Nominal,( l.0 +0.250 -0.0) Installed Thermo-lag is bounded by See other parameters.

Max. unknown tested T.L. since installed thickness is at least same as test.

.( See R O C. Y-104476 )

The presence of V-nbs is V-Ribs, positioned parallel to run of cable The locztion on the top and bottom of See other parameters. I BARRIER STIFFNESS V-RIB LOCATION & ORIENTATION unknown, and is therefore tray on top and bottom , and perpendicular the tray is where orientation of the V-assumed to be non-existent. to length of tray along sides of tray. ribs is most critical from a structural view point. Orientation parallel to the mn does not add to the structural capability of the wrapped system, hence the tested bounds installed since orientation parallel to tray is limiting.

BARRIER STRESS-SKIN Inside and outside faces of the Inside and outside faces of the panel. Same. See other parameters.

LOCATION panel. ,

t BARRIER JOINT TYPE Precoated edges with 330-1 330-1 T.L. Tronel grade used to caulk all NEI Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191- 85 minutes -thermocouples Thermo-Lag trowel grade joints and seams between panels (Pre- 199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 292,293 & 309 exceeded ,

material and butt joined at Buttered butt joints) on straight run 303-311 Tray D. temperature limits after 85 .

ends (Pre-Buttered butt joints) sections, and separate panel pieces on minutes.

on straight run sections, inside and outside face of radial bend. 7 and individual top & bottom and side pieces miter cut on  ;

radial bend.

BARRIER FASTENERS TYPE, #SC312SS 3/4" X .025" thick  %" wide Stainless Steel band 0.020" thick, Tested bounds installed in width, other See other parameters. i' SPACING AND DISTANCE ,SS Bandmg with 204 SS wing wing seals,2" on cach side of panel butt- parameters are same.

FROM JOINT. seals, %"x.020" with %" wing joint at 12" interval. [

seals #202SS 12" O.C. Max. I spacing,2" max spacing from i joints. #304SS Bricht Annealed Wire .080,14ga.

r cbtfrev. doc t

NSED/Desien & AnalysisfThermo- Lac Proicct IP-M41340 R/l Page 34 of 4o FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E-FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762', 3 lir. rating)

SEGMENTS: CB1FK2E-04 AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTIll7_ED FOR EVALUATION Max. 22" across the bottom & Mat 22" across the bottom & top of the Same. See other parameters.

BARRIER UNSUPPORTED SPAN top of the tray. tray.

Non-specified in installation or This vcas a base-line test, no upgrades in Same. See odier parameters.

BARRIER JOINT REINFORCEhENT inspection details. the fonn ofjoint re-enforcement was performed.

One hour rated Thermo Lag 330-1 V. Same, except no V-ribs. See other parameters.

BARRIER STRUCTURAL AND llanger=> wrapped per detail 24 Attaciunent B, using 330-1 Ribbed Panel material, total coverage no INTERVENING STEEL PROTECTION T.L subliming material l' intervening steel.

( Ground Straps, liangers, Non- min. thickness from the point f

Dedicated Conduits, Fire Stops) where the hanger supports the cable tray all the way io the point the support attaches to the auxiliary steet , and extending so as to maintain an I8" coverage from cable tray envelope on the intervening steel. ' No intervening steel i

present.

i t

b i

l P

cblfrev. doc ,

- - - - . -_ - - - . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - - - _ - - - _ - _ - _ _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_a__-__--- --___-- . - _ - - - _ - - - - _ - _ . - _ - _ - - _ _ - _ . -

I l

NSED/ Design & AnalysisfThermo- Laz Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Paec.35 of 9 O FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E FIRE ZONE: CD-!f(Control Bld'g El. 762,3 lir. rating)

I SEGMENTS: CBIFK2E-05 i

TESTED CONI IGURATION(S) COMPARISON EVALUATION llMmNG ENDURANCE ,

PERFORMANCE AS-BUILT PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION UTILIZED FOR EVALUATION (Ref.4)

Cable Tray Ladder Back (B-Line Systems, Ladder Back tested tray bounds the See other parameters.

COHB 10DITY TYPE Cable Tray 14;a Ventnb bottom (llusky Products Inc., Inc. Catalogue No. 24A-09-24-144) installed solid ventrib bottom tray, due to lower thermal capacity, higher model PSX1) thermal conductivity of the Ladder Back Trav.

24" wide Smaller tested tray size bounds larger 85 minutes -thermocouples COHB 10DITY SIZE 24 wide 4" deep trav due to lower thermal capacity, 292,293 & 309 exceeded 6" deep lower thermal resistance, and larger temperature limits aner 85 extemal surface area to thermal minutes capacity ratio.  ;

f NEl Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A,and 287-295, 303-311 Tray D.

Steel, Pregalvamic, ASIM Alununum Allm 606LT6 Aluminum tested cable tray bounds 85 mmutes -thermocouples COMMODIlY MATLRIAL 292,293 A 309 escceded i A-525-G90 installed steel tray due to lower thermal capacity and higher thermal temperature limits aner 85  !

conductivity of aluminum. NEl Test 2-

^

minutes.

10 Thermo Couples 191-199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295,303-311 Tray D.

Cable Tray = 6.20 #/n Thermal mass ofinstalled See other parameters COMMODITY CONTENTS Cables = 3 899 (Att. D) configuration is greater than tested cover =^ 3 900 configuration, and is therefore Total = 14 00 8/n Total = 12.74 #/n botmded,due to its higher intemal thermal capacity.  !

Vertical straight rim with Vertical straight run with vertical radial Same. See other parameters-l COMMODITY ORIENTATION vertical radial bend bend Thermo-Lag 330-1 one layer Thermo-Lag 330-1, one layer preformed Same, except no V ribs. See other parameters. ,

BARRIER TYPE preformed panel. 3 lir. rating. V-ribbed panel 3 Ifr. rating.

t cblfretdoc

~

NSED/Desien & AnalysisfThermo- Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/I Pare ?[>of 40 I

FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E FIRE ZONE: CB-lf(Control Bid'g El. 762",3 Hr. rating)

SEGMENTS: CBIFK2E-05 AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION (S) COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE l PARAMETERS CONFIGURATION URLIZED FOR dVALUABON( Ref:4)

Min.1.0" 1.0" Nommal,( l 0 +0 250 -0.0) installed Thermo-Lag is bounded by See other parameters. -

BARRIER T1DCKNESS Max. unknown tested T.L. since installed thickness is at least same as test.

.( See R O C. Y-104476 )

The presence of V-ribs is V-Ribs, positioned parallel to run of cable The location on the top and bottom of See other parameters.

BARRIER STIFFNESS V-RIB unknown, and is therefore tray on top and bottom , and perpendicular the tray is where orientation of the V-LOCATION A ORIENTATION assumed to be non-existent to length of tray along sides of tray. ribs is most critical from a structural view point. Orientation parallel to the run does not add to the structural capability of the wrapped system, j hence the tested bounds installed since i orientation parallel to tray is limiting.

Inside and outside faces of the Inside and outside faces of the panel. Same. See other parameters.

BARRIER STRESS-SKIN LOCAT10N panel >

330-1 T.L Trowel grade used to caulk all NEl Test 2-10 Thermo Couples 191- 85 minutes -thermocouples  ;

BARRIER JOINT TYPE Precoated edges with 330-1 Thermo-Lag trowel grade joints and seams between panels (Pre- 199,207-215 Tray A, and 287-295, 292,293 & 309 exceeded material and butt joined at Buttered butt joints)on straight run 303-311 Tray D. temperature limits aller 83 ,

ends (Pre-Buttered butt joints) sections, and sciurate panel pieces on minutes l on straight run sections, inside and outside face of radial bend.  !

i and individual top & bottom and side pieces miter cut on radial bend. i BARRIER FASTENERS TYPE, #SC312SS, 3/4" X .025" thick  %" wide Stamless Steel band 0.020* thick, Tested bounds installed in nidth, other See other parameters.  ;

.SS Banding with 204 SS wing wing seals,2" on each side of panel butt- parameters are same.

SPACING ANDDISTANCE ,

FROM JOINT. seals, %"x.020" with %" wing joint at 12" interval.

seals #202SS 12" O C. Mat spacing,2" max spacing from joints. #304SS Bright [

Annealed Wire .0S0,14ca. j i

l cbifrev. doc  ;

NSED/ Design & Analysis /Thermo- Lac Proicct . IP-M-0340 R/1 Pare'L7 of ItO e

FIRE BARRIER SYSTEM: K2E FIRE ZONE: CB-If(Control Bld'g El. 762",3 lir. rating)

SEGMENTS: CB1FK2E-05 AS-BUILT TESTED CONFIGURATION UTILIZED COMPARISON EVALUATION LIMITING PERFORMANCE CONFIGURATION FOR EVALUATION ENDURANCE PARAMETERS Max. 22" across the bottom & Max. 22' across the bottom & top of the Same. See other parameters.

13ARRIER UNSUPPORTED SPAN top of the tray. tray.

None specified in installation Tlus uns a base-lme test, no upgrades in Same. See other parameters.

BARRIER JOINT REINFORCEMENT or inspection details. the form ofjoint re-enforcement was perfonned.

One hour rated Hermo Lag 330-1 V- Same, except no V-ribs. See other parameters.

BARRIER STRUCTURAL AND Hanger => urapped per detail INTERVENING STEEL 24 Attachment B, using 330-1 Ribbed Panel material, total coverage no PROTECTION T.L subliming matenal l- intervening steel

( Ground Straps, llangers, Non- min. tiickness from the point Dedicated Conduits, Fire Stops) uhere the hanger supports the cable tray all the way to the point the support attaches to the auxiliary steel , and extending so as to maintain an 18* coverage from cable tray envelope on the intervening steel. No intervening steel present.

cblfrev. doc

NSED/Desien & Analuis/Thermo-l.ne Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Page 38 or 40 7.0 JUSTIFICATION ANALYSIS: j The following are justification analysis for the performance parameters that were found to be ,

unbounded or configurations that were not specifically tested. l l

1.' The installed barrier unsupported span of 34" is not bounded by the tested l (NEI Test 2-10) span of 22", however, the installed configuration offers equivalent if l not better structural integrity than the tested configuration, for the following reasons:

The NEI test on tray "A" of the Ref. 4 test report was performed without any pre-banding (i.e., internal support mechanism).This produces a configuration in which the only support provided to prevent sagging under self-weight and/or to prevent damage due to impact caused by falling debris through out the tray run for the Thermo-Lag panels pieces on the top and on the inside of the radial bend is provided by the side i

rail flanges of the cable tray. This configuration produces a min. unsupported area of l 22"x 48"( 1056 in*) , the installed configuration as verified by walkdown and per

reference 11, utilizes 3/4" min, wide banding on the straight cable tray runs and radial bends at 12" min. interval to provide additional support to the top panels to prevent them from excessive sagging under self-weight. This configuration produces a max, unsupported area of 34"x12"( 408 in2 ). Due to the structural behavior of the two configurations, the 22"x48" panel area will produce bending moment along the axis parallel to the tray since its only support joints are on the tray rails, while the 12"x34" panel area will produce bending moment along the axis perpendicular to the 12" long sides since it is supported on four joints ( the tray rails on two sides and the banding on the other two sides), the installed configuration is therefore considered structurally to be superior to the tested configuration.

In reference 4 (NEl Test 2-10) openings were noticed on the bottom and on the outside bottom of the radial bend of Tray A, and a large opening was present on the outside bottom of the radial bend in Tray D as the stainless ste.el bands had broken and a section of barrier had fallen into the furnace. The thermocouples installed in the areas of barrier breaches were the ones that exceeded the temperature criteria at 86 minutes. These thermocouple numbers are 292, 293, and 309. Following the Hose Stream test no additional openings were observed. At CPS cable trays are steel Ventrib bottom (solid bottom) versus aluminum Ladder Back tray used in the test.

The CPS trays offer higher thermal capacity (lower thermal conductivity) which should retard the heat transfer into the tray and therefore provides better protection to the cables. The CPS solid bottom trays are better capable of withstanding fire fighting activities in that the force exerted by the hose stream will tend to push the Thermo-Lag panel pieces against a solid backing hence distributing the. force over a wider area and therefore reducing the possibility of damage to the panels.

cbltrev

-. . . . . . .. - - . . ~ - _ .-. - .. .-.--.- . - .. - .-

! i NSED/ Design & Analnix/Thermo-Lac Project . IP-M-n34n R/1 Page 33 of M 7.0 JUSTIFICATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

Hence it is concluded that the structural integrity of the installed configuration in which the unsupported span is unbounded, can be conservatively supported until temperature )

criteria were exceeded (i.e., 85 minutes), including the external forces imposed by Fire +

fighting activities.

3 s

2 The installation of the interface between the cable trays and the BISCO ceiling and floor j Penetration Seal (Attachment B pages 7 & 8) is as follows:

l a) The cable tray is covered with Thermo-12g 330-1 prefabricated panel as previously  ;

described in section 6.1 and illustrated in Attachment B , is flush to the i Penetration Seal.

I b) A piece of prefabricated Thermo-Lag panel is cut large enough to cover the face of i the penetration plus 3" flange for concrete fasteners. Holes for cable trays that

! penetrate the Penetration Seal are cut out from the panel piece as required. The sections created by the cutting out of the one piece are such that each piece can be i fastened to the concrete wall using %"xl %" Tapcon Screws of sufficient length to ,

ensure M " concrete penetration, and carbon steel washer / plates .

I c) The sections are mounted to the concrete floor or ceiling using the fasteners at a i maximum 12" interval with one fastener per section and two fasteners per flange I mmimum.

l I l d) Sufficient amount of Thermo-Lag is applied to cover the bolt heads of the concrete J l fasteners with the 1" min, envelope thickness.

l l e) The installation is than completed by filling in all edges and joints with Thermo-Lag 330-1 Subliming Trowel Grade material.

I The weight of 1" thick Thermo-Lag panel is approximately 10.50 Lbs/ft2 (Ref. 21). It is calculated that the maximum force per screws is approximately 6.5 lbs. This force produces negligible stresses compare to the tensile and shear stress allowables of the

%" screws.

The Thermo-Lag cover of the penetration is not impacted by fire fighting or interaction of falling debris due to its mounting flush against the ceiling and floor penetrations.  !

l Of critical importance in this evaluation is the structural integrity of the horizontal sections of Thermo-Lag panel to ensure that the joints surrounding the trays where the Firewrap trays penetrate the Penetration Seal will remain intact during a fire.

usa

4 NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo-Lar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Page A cof A O I 7.0 JUSTIFICATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

The construction of the joint interface between the horizontal ceiling and floor mounted panel pieces is an overlapping of two panel pieces ( see attachment B detail 16 ) and as  ;

such it exhibits better thermal protection characteristics than the Score and Fold, or the I

Butting of pieces of Thermo-Lag together methods used in the Reference 4 NEI tested ,

cable trays. l l

The installation proce'ss for the interface between the cable trays and the BISCO ceiling / floor penetration seal ( see attachment B detail 16 ) is similar to the above  !

installation for the wall penetration interface, however, in this configuration the anchor bolts are subjected to tensile forces due to the weight of the Thermo-Lag panel pieces  ;

for the ceiling penetration. The largest piece of panel is considered to be 84" x 6" = l 504 in2 or 3.5 ft 2held together by approximately 6 screws . Lbs/ screw is calculated to be < 6.5 in tension , the punching shear effect of the bolts trying to punch / pry through  ;

the Thermo-Lag is minimize due to the double layer of stress skin and the washer / plate  :

arrangement utilized in this installation. Hence the bolts are considered adequate to j support the Thermo-Lag pieces and therefore maintained the butt joints and seams together.

I It is therefore concluded that the structural and thermal integrity of the installed  !

configuration is at least supported by the test until temperature criteria were' exceeded (i.e., 85 minutes).

8.0 RESULTS / CONCLUSIONS:

Based on parameter comparison of the various segments in Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3, the installed configuration is bounded by trays A and D tested configurations in NEI Test 2-10 with the exception of the specific commodities and configuration deviations that are analyzed in Section 7.

Justification provided in Section 7 shows that the items described therein exhibit characteristics and attributes that are comparable to tested configurations and are therefore supported by the NEI Test 2-10 , until temperature criteria were exceeded.

In conclusion the installed CPS configurations of Cable Trays P2E ,C2E, and K2E in Fire )

Zone CB-lf that are protected by Thermo-Lag fire Barrier System, would meet the temperature acceptance and structural integrity criteria in accordance with NEI Tests for 85 minutes '

of fire duration.

i I

sbt frev

=8:I ' b v E5E !sN q[1 _

j

! { !l ] ;gN y g ER5 2 E eE *;Im;8d

_7, C e-Yjs gg $ ,= tI

• i<*

h4 $+ajd i- ~ v !V  ;

8 y o. 5o O .Qo a g g a; hby! go g

,Q! $g !E S8 hL d#dY Yg.

gyg.

R h J*g dj g,R 5< $ !iEheI285d

' N N NQ @*

x _ .

s s'

• o Q 4

i 4tEt 8tfr s m

t itt 7 D

1t Pcx sr t .

g 0 Y Ay = "d- t R EA eA t- '

R E 2 nt 6e e h~ Q L tTl.tTtY t n'7. z n A t L s- ;.

• . w. -

4I R

T NE&

OAAaLat u. E ll T}$' i

, " g ,

/ CCCcEFs

.M_-}/%-

S iS  ;

=

g e e

., f.

b --

w

, l -

A I

6 :I -

3 4 -,

l 1

1 M

s --

m.

t i u.

a w o o- o 1

c 2

7 s'

s -

s E

Jh s

_i E. C s' 2 i u. T 9 cu ae i

• *4 1 i, ' *. "

' 7 6 B e '

' Y %c T. s C,c c- E' 0 L E

7 6 -@23 y 2

("

)

E I )E t

t (C I

.\ K

- x' y 4 \'

/ V.

\'

\

(

h _] .

5'g

- ..e }

/4 S -

l

.[

(

f I'

, l l- #.

.' i

[' u "E.

A /

f1) s f H T

s[  ; ' . -

x o S

T o

~..

.A a

M T

\

(\

t c

A fl- -

./ F T s

'l ~ -

J W w $ r E N

l i .

Y L

m 7 / _' 3

}- Q

)E Q s b-V

^ -

e # i 2 1 K ct (P

"?m a

(

r- 3 b t

c l ,

?*

t  :

r e T.

\ *' 4 i

F t

n nR4 "

0 6

'7

- "8 s' 8 e e 0

< ' L A t E.

7 I , s 1 I

' '1 5

7 s

T f

T B'

T t r C L tc L E i

v Q E

Z

)

t e

t

)

E 1 .

A- P

( c R

(

• W l F

CE ".

1An 1 5 r 06e D t 2.

66a Ls .

t S 64t T_

M oi e t t E S 1 4 s R -

E u uis T G a6a sss U G o a O W E

_ u u..cTcst EEt t E o t

r T

M W - .

o c. i um L

c as Ir A R

i A( 2 S A

t i Mu D SSS b E E

R 5 1s

3. 3 s 22z SS.

EE-

' ll'

I a e JO I *133HS c Qa,6 % Ol@

Ed.' - -ll.(li}71.Q-iid t 'ON DMMfUQ f . gpo.o..p e oseugn.e eeu , spia san sped -

V[hiPOO1J '

aur'essenese smasenpa puese hMiDNtMYuo 'A3d -'

l v/l1 11vm I e

@E 7a'33VOfdd:AB 03A "ww & WW / v 38V M Td/+ 's b f.D hie.TOO 25 6 *sT8 4 AV 544: As 03x33H3 ..P 1.1

• NOlivA113 E

31vo '3 d 31VO iA8 NotidW3530 A3H  % If (VO T.l l s AG NMvuo ~491!1MD)* DNLC1100  !

! D60C 'E60E 'Z60f 'ON gor 03Sl0 'Op02. M 13VH!NIO fel W)l}f f.V Nim 0178 'l 1INO 'NOI AVi$ W3M(M NOika13 I

, f n

C'I s

,- v' o.{

t .g

[L/ /9 3F Y .

Ij 7 , e4 C . To '

3L '

3 \ \

E 'ao h

nu

• a

=6 a

w y

1

'i S

b < > .-

vi; eW oO j

E"g

.c t j

, g tj, , . 11 e

3 <1s P o .T u d>-

ausunug=u, i

i c t .,

x 2 'a rJ acu unt

+

gg j' r p.) b t

} +

l q ., gd 45M sm

• t ..~/ s; s ,g 11- -

M W . .i 'fjE" -y

' 21 do .

A b@ -

': l

' i f / .!

. ::Np...

g . . . , . .

. 93, . . l

! 8

/

1 i

l 77 F v' h l ) 5 3 d

"' D 5 (D' th rl r '

q5 -

U #>

e, 4 M o

h

a. *j d ...

I g Ji ay e- - -,

. oto-3 t')dW'.>6) .

$.. ; }.3 = $-

. ,# 7b 33 N ) +

d' g$. 't'"> d'97 @

g x

.:a tw a zwa .> @ --

1. s O

1. d '

{

O O< ,

e /

\# sad *J 'y*

N N w t/)

l 1

• J s* 4 A

h $b5 t

+

• 1 W 5. :/ O 'U l,- .' T i.u.

n.i u.:

1 < -. - l= *ue /- ,.,h$. p yu.'i ud:;

6 >g()

l ~

d 4 W SSU r -

n -

• . / *.*C .,6 -) J ,

<V ___.c-, -~

-1 h )a

/ /

.i

-f s

e

'a

?. rf r__.

fj f' a' i fg-ff J- _

\

6 is; I:. t, a 2l.

_e - f 7

pf 4*> ll9uu hh h - -

b--- "' g 4 .d ti

, .5%

$y 50' hf Q

! 5  ?> $

.- - n /- ~

dh. Jt thjgyh ,"f,0- 9 7M d t W @ 7

m .- ,_.

> JO $ a133HS 0,l ey/(:J199,  !

'E M.No M*eesiamo maem W a Rdh?)-TlL9 O8'ON DNLAVWO c}jplVSVIO W .VWO*J3d V/?(aW001J (6D /(1-Sli *l'lve 98v4 fs 31V0f CL3: Ag r 3AOHddV & .hW / v38, 937A f 5d>W42 I 311 NAT6038 6 9#r4 f 31V0 fdd: A9 03M33H3 .931% NOlivA373 3170 TJ 3170 sAB NOlidiW3S30 A3d *)NIY 31VO Y. M a A8 HmVWG %3J a9)s DN416n9 E D60s 't60t '260t 'ON 000 C3Sie 'OpGZ .M 13VWANO3 531tDOSSV Nt207VD 'l 11NA 'NOl1V1S W3%Od NO1M13 ,

1L

bl I U Q Y((l . ,

O .

to (-},.

il

,J V' 5UN Yif k b hk'

" s N.I a

,e -n3Em5 Boaw ss 5 I e

o

• g..

l' g:

e .

el -

' o fe - E6 n

li .-.

1. (* 2 .

ye

$ t

< 3 M

"$ 3 = '

i Y%l  ?- T 9 i 9 .a

, , s <

l

, i -

V .

st.

l - . , '

' n e I l

.  ! /! g if a og______o_ ~-

.. . i ,

a l i j

,...*4.,,..*-

i r .- ,

5:.,.

.:@ . .Y

.: w, .

2T

... .; .... . r..

e a $ o1,a: fa  !

. ..:- .; . ..a . . e 0 -

7y ,

w r 1

_a au g .

i  %  ?? l D------o_}gesf

. 1 a .

4 po-

--- -O i N __

i

-F x 1 s l \ 'n 2

J

\ ( 9 i i

.\

i

\ a W

9 g# , i OC

- - - e i U5 I D. ti.

6 6 gg e e i 1 = *T . V O i

s  : tu t

<C k o-37M:!190 (5).

01..,5.

jj$

~

h 98 98

<5 -*

ee e ,

p f" y

, y ,,

C/3 ud 6 g 3222 www w 2 #

Y, c$n e u Y N 4be*

"j a04 ggo f Ma52 O ci ".

• 6 5

d aaan .... s wwww

A7 ' A cA M EN T E PAGE t or 7 6 6'

[ -

g 2C  ; , 2+" , 24" _

C64C AET E FIRE B AR RIC R WALL

,3 g a,, ,t As i g g .

T'APCoR COMCRGT6 FASTENER

' [ 3/4"f,lA!PL IM CoRCRETE

, ' lff. . '

l '

l l .e- -

[

) W h l N "* " h v v Da \y r

12. pag,

.__en c, v{,

K2.f_

e

? - '

3

'(

V dx E H

/g g

(.

Y N_

- C ov E A MEAD OF TH tDub-LAG S 36-1 W CoucRE1C FAS' TREE. WITH PD,EFABblChTED D ANEL

_hi 05\

N\lM. REG'D TRIC KMG SS cF TW RMo -1.A r, 2 5 0 - 1 I4. GA. MIAL ST AIMLE S S STEEL TIE WIRE ct A1 N I"MIM REQ'D 5/k" * .bH MtM STAlt4LESS f, , _;N Fot AHR RATlRG, STEEL BANDlMQ AT 12."

. I'h,. dE I NMX SPACIMQ

$gey, A_A g.. -3 a s -

-. 5 A t rtLL IK ALL EDGES AMD JatMTS WITR

-4 l _

s

] raEnArs -tAE 336-i rgowEL QR ADE WT.

5 ;s '

s , -r. ' n- - '

-f -

ss s== w - c,wu m

$""-l, _lll J ?D"%L*.T RC ,Y, nn~S'% }

Wy//f//kyyu e~a g mm ,w" o~

p fy,, N o A go,~v ou inunt or m  %

o[]

f' i G FLOOR SLAS mg g

i T,]*$ *urt^%* To

> wot E. DF) mT n =>s m x v'wW is A cw% u.a3u Sot % -

-*t-c- . v m u% ,,, m, _

• T 5 i s % w 70 he. % w d(,, gw44-W ' - s m n4_ puus s u.

g PREFABRICATED PANEL DESICxM HE V. NO DATE ORAwN AFPROvtD F6R INSTALL ATloR oF THE READY N-m A

e ACCESG FIRE BARRIER 6)st VERTICAL t r ~; 7. ,~ ~ -

h m ~~ ~ DISCO ,

o C48LE TRAY RISERS 4DJACEMT

,o T6 FIRE BARI21ER WALLS 1

-4r tQ t=*.r.- .

AT7 AcBME.NT L PAcrc '2 or '7 CO M.C RE T E FIRE 6ARRIC R W A L L- a 1  ; y t

d lR . A AT i MG- TAPCO)L COMCAGT6 FASTENER Aus sTf4.t Ds 185 2"w 'V) ccAAM /

/ 3/4" Mlrl IM COMCRETE >

wn*/2Ha./t m e e uw I . , :. . . . /

_ P _^ T e n W : Cn st %o'. ,L , ,.

i i. :.. C ' . (

W+ W ,

y. -

7. .s EL,~l W -1* i wa W,, -

_. W h,1 s ssm s s s s C2E ss sx ,_ssxx.

j$

~' ' 1' ., /

N N, \'

/ '\ ' ,'<'

- L: - ?// .. . _.'/f,4'h.i a C OY E R MEAD OF CoucRE1E rAsigtR WITH THEkub-LhG 336-1 d j

,1 PREFABAICATED PANEL 1 %- G A. MI AL STalMLE S S '

,,' mig. REgo ruimMGss or f/1* Miti AEQ'O FOR I HR STEEL TIE WIRE ot T E RMO - LA (, 330-1 CIRE RATIM I"MfM REQ'O s

8s.62.5 utu Start 4LCSS sN [

F00, 351R R4 RQ .

TEEL BANDIMQ AT IL" 2, , _ s_

AAAX SPAtlALQ

((p[:'.

N s \ $[C.T,A.A A- y'.-

~

.- FtLL IR ALL EDGES AMD J61MTS WITR s Y. Tl4 E RAAh -L A G t 336-1 TA6WEL QRaoG MAT.

^fr

-s- i s s It' rm.

s N SeE. A s % i og g,

• Tye  :

(_ .~ . . ..

mNN \ \\ H f ,

FLh0RSLA .

~

PREFaoRICATED PANEL DESlCdi REv ho cart onaws appnovgo I~ '

F6R INSTALL ATioR oF'THE READY m j h ACCESS FIRE BARRIER 6}1 VERTICAL {gf*g' ~ ~ '

DISCO -

CABLE TRAY RISERS dDJACEMT T6 FIRE BARI2iER WALLS f'fi '

j*fo T ee p gow 72

. . . . . _1 -- <

A-MACAW \EM T #> h c4 5oF7 i

TEF: FIRE EST TCST ARTIC.LE TEST REPORT No.

LADDER C.ABLE TTRAY ITt. SA.It-lB] - -

• ITL 85 I-lOf, j

P k

APPRDVED %' ST. STEtt 2AMDINc. OR STAIMLESS

'5TEEtc.~1E.W(1tt Mfa.

it* SF.LtNC=. "

/

--/ / 9 $ )

'l / V '

/ :n -

n

• j USL LITHER (Z)'la" MirABOCATEP BOARDS OR D)-l" FREFABRICATED

/ dS- ' ~ ~ , ~ g .

I BOARb WFTM ANouTER t AYER

. - g. .,

g- - --

-.gp p

or 3Wul ~5TRE55 LKl4 TDR-TME 3'l400R RUtur..

l 1

' g.7g . p3 gg ga usts w i " 14io. wk utAs.. ..RMLAs . .

-l CABLE TRAY E4571tCE55 DE$tG.M  ;

2 PklD A 10 luSTALLAT104 1 50-2845 3% bb.s I a

of TOP S EC.T ro N REv. No DATE on aws. eywmo l

~

. TYPICAL PRE. FAB. BOARP - . - . . . .!

CABLE TRAY COVERlNG - - -

.)

', 13 HotAR RATIE) __ ; ;h

, . CABLE TRAY EASY ACCESS

""~*EKwra 3-HR

]Ys

AE ACM F NT E OM 4_ O E 7i REF: TIKE TEST .

TEST REPORT Ho.

TLST ARTIC.LL TfPICAL PREFAB. BOARP ~ ~

LADDER CABLE TRM \T L 84 101

. m. es-i-rot, CABLE IRAY COVERIM C, ,

(3 Hour RATlW) 1

= 'i ? ::::::

. -?Y :E=:lD &9 '

LASE CITutR (P_) 1/c"

/ .------- , @;lf !-!

s

.';lla! >-3li!

! l $

eat raaricATLD soauns  !;.i

. l AA% //- .

I

i !

AR M l* PtETARR]cATED l'1 "2- 2 ' - - -' -

t'

- - - - - -/,'^"'""" i Ud!2[

%-hM 5 BOAR.D wtT H AN --

'I - 5 Ms 'l

1. , M si CGT5.R 33o w9 .AYEA stut.ss0Fswau 4 -

4):5 a 7),

j r,

TE 3 HouA 85" ' _y

/ / c u

/ ./r y, .

ne vs .~s~ e ...

/

6' v>L e M . ~. -

W Ms ( A,w(cas [ [ g 47

/ -

r a i

.4

/

_/ .

th~

%e APrRoyaD1[4*M.gEtt m g  :

H 0R .5I STEtt 14 g,. TIL:- -

~

f l

.g

....g

, l p .v1RE. max. rc.srActus ,

y.... 4' l . i1 .

CABLE. TRAY d o, il

(

t to-to-es %s REV. fu0 DATE D8t AWM RPPflowfD i ,

l ? 1 '

i j -.

.~_ ;* -

m 4 l

'Ii 3 CABLE TRAY EASY ACCDS

l 2

COMPLETE COVERAGE 3-HR l - Are* otto n M {ErrlE lb

oArt i sc A. , i no. i-.i- -

l

> z , e t. t 6. .

3.... _.. m .. _.

gf;"? S-  ? '

b w

j dl s 8 s 4 a p .v.1 zg 1 w 6 o b  : i, i B" !i

$ d d g  !  !

l 1 9t 6

!s :lil l ei aei s

!u 4 3

JIit N -

i "// -

-}" 1 l/'/

f N " '

//7

'/

'/

g 3 r- /

! / d t /, .

\. --a -

z - .

mg m /  :

I/?;

@ ,;/l, _,

i/ i

,g$

9 ;',

m.

wer/ reg 2.v (9 e

(

cA

.. / ' '

/.

ilf't,

_g g

-a 4

e 3' :

' j'9;f.,,

i e l g.

$h j pg j ]

m h ,. , y es

. / ,,, .

j

r p~

hh,b xc b

v . 3 ic i

.)

50 )1rg,

[6 S O gp, P'

, 33 e'

k l

(' I 7

i C <

I

$ 'k .

,: .e f j .\ \ -.

.\ J .

wmmme - a

~

\e MMl3siD !9 l s

'egi ft E

g ao F.i Gb . s

.g..

gg g.

ng g.; g.

a$

NO - bI kg b C,h

', A TrocAA MENT ' lb N6 7 TYP. CABLE T'R A Y WITil CABLES

/.

5...,

mcp -

. .[,

y A . ." ., . p A

'. ' BISCO SF-60 y g i

' .- . SILICONE ELASTOMER 3 HR. FIRE RATING

, 5" TYP.

' ( SEE NOTE NO.3.) ,

i f

y -

I UAbermdk@ . ' '

~ .

THESE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS ~,_ _

AND DATA ARE THE PROPERTY OF BRAND AND SHALL NOT BE USED, PUBLISHED OR REPRODUCED AS THE SECTlDN A-A .

BASIS FOR M ANUFACTURING USE, OR SALE TO OTHERS WITHOUT '

. FR CONCRETE A', h ONRY WALL, OR CONCRETE FLOOR PENETRATIONS.

2. THIS DETAll TO BE USED WHEN POWER ,

CABLES ARE PRESENT. SEAL CRITERIA FIRE TEST REPORT 74 8-IO0 RATING l 2 3 __ 4 FIRE TEST REPORT 74e- 0S .

3. MINIMUM DEPTH OF 7-l/2" WHEN KELLUM XX PRESSURE TEST HEP 0HT 748-106 SATISFIES GRIP IS INTERNAL OF SEAL.

CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT-1, BALOWIN ASSOCIATES CONTR ACT K-28 40, BISCO JOB NO. 3285 bisco TYPICAL INSTALLATION: CABLE TBAY THRU FIRE BARRIER ,

DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D.8Y DATE REV. BY: ' ' ' ' ' ' "

DRAWN BYs RLP. D ATE

• S 31-83 i RLR 4384 CtM NG tI 10 8 NtJMLitIR JlS f./7 8f ' ',4go

"" '" f l[','i , , l', ,' * *,, , ,

• • r*

APPROVEDBYsN D ATE' 1/D/83

'l R t.R f t-(.-8 4 R(-Visc T&s7 nJ c ( Abb Horar 3 J. M, /s/ze/M r8d'*.'"'a*'..ecoes

);

DETAIL NO.108

. TEST ARTICLE... TEST RE7JstT No. -

'llN15TRuT ITL 04 -lUlB1 -~ .

• pSEISMIC~~ SUPP6RT-

/ ,

. . L Na7 t t __ . -

I I -

BYER511E~RECTIMGULR -

--tP CoMDulT--SEeTioM  ; E CRAVITY LOADED CUTIF6KMMELt C- /

FolMT OT cERAtAtc stangET s t j AITACMMENT J.  :

' M6TE 2. 330-1 THERMo-LA4 # 1 L

SUBLIMlVG NGERIAL 2' <:

t Y:4'MIK.FOR HR.

t

_ W"MIM.THICKMESS FOR s -

': T*11JMtM.F6R MR. (d

-. o i RR. D i" MlR. THICKNESS .L '  ;

-:rf, , ; 3 Fog HR. FIRE PATINQ

, - ]

y . 3 ., b  ?

[..

1. Qi _ / . -. ll * ,d \

h F?Mr4cx9 y*4+:&Yh.8+#6c;W.jt%;#* opstf#Jr@:L94ent,4:

-..,i- .. .. .n

~ . -

,.*  ?-

6, CAELE TRAY DEDICATEb o a

~

FOR COVE RA GE . -

g e <

~

.: -- is l, i a CASES 1B" c6VEDAQE FRbu

'.EW AY EMVEL6PE' MUST " i b b [ '

'ut4TAINED ,

}

i epSYsfpPA24:(x6tf.' >evit : > tad::s::.'<ffr!#')#2WTQ:

,yf-'

1 g .,

1 (

IXill'.RV STE.EL AM EMBEDMEMT A- i l; ,-

X:7"MIM.FOR 4HR.

. BE "OYESED BY oTHERS. d  ; -

. C.ABLETRAY NOT DEDICATED -- #

X X*18* MIR. FOR 3 HR.

, .: l'OR. C.OVERAc.E 3 i '. F :

,i d L L .

L I l lt 8 [] 9 .J .

~

l I U / N U I

p I. 3 3 8 ', LLE PE26 I 4 f 2. . 1t-10 67 LL7- DIPS 1 :o-te es Jep T'D5 i

' REV.PC OATE ORAwN APPROW D B

typic.AL DETAIL FOR MANGER E -] ,~,*~^ blSCO 7 i, SUPPORT WITH THER/40-LAG .

TH ERMO-L AG HANGER -

DOVER AGE DETAll Amato er. o. Senarz

{'

oart l $C AI.E l DRAWN l 8. A 1 eised

(

. A m ra xLun C _

l Pe. i of i -

Attachment 3 page 9 of10 "Diermo-Lag Matrix 2 N94 Item Parametets Thenno-Lag (T-L) Fire Ba!Yier Parameters e

n 0

• O" mteso.55n y ,, ,, ,,, , , , ,, E , = , = = = == - . re

= = = = t , , - es ww a a d 3 d 3 4.3 d' d 2

a 2 =4

2 a a 2 d 2 2 4 4 4 4 d d3 3 3 33 4 4 c 4

= .1 3 4 3

_ _ a , a a - ~ - - - d-:

i -

16 E

,1 e e

x-f i

2 y

^

l i

! i E

si E

7 1- *!

v+ se 3 3 . i - m . ,! , 1.

1 - g 3 3 i j L

-2 a .) g 1 3 li I E

? 6 g a g 1 I 3 5 =-

l l 8 = i s ~ 6 4

)

f E i

= v g g j E' 1 f

l. "1 1 0 "

-] ] F i 2

i :s 4

))

R j a s 1

l E

e

.I o g i

=

i c 5 a s i

v 1 2 {

i f i i 1 - A i i f 3 : E 5

y 1 s 1 2 ,I- h' cps we 2

• 3a 3 i i m 3 '1! 3 2 2 6 3 y7 .;2 rm n-us a i m 2 1 2 2 1 1 a a j m 4 8

i g 5 a 1 & w y

j g -

.I i 2 3, 8

].el 3 I

f a s

m ,

a i t s 4 j p 4 is s

E a s

5 0 a x ee s E e e s

%r on.e,e r e ,e x > a 8 9 x a o N a t__L_ s_3 a3 5, f m a m s

& a il n. x 2 .ii z d' x ;3 3 x t 2 l 3 4 s s ? e , no ti 12 13 i4 15 is i7 .8 i, 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 2? 28 2s so si 32 n.34 35 36 3? 3: 39 4o 4i 42 c 44 43 46 7e gneed serep N N Y Y-%. ale. Age a4 500 MCM m/s N m/s T3 de n/a N mh ICT 4.5* I*

• m/s man N Y *

• N Y

• Et  ? N meme N mFe m/s N N *

~-

73 W strop M Y Y N N m?e C We ah 500 MW we n -

TE._tt are M mFa ICT e.5* " ^

- - u n

• 4 N Y

• E?  ? N meme N m/e n/a N N 4 V2 go eed strop Y N N Y N m/s C mh m#e 500 Mm m/s N m/s L we N mas n,a C ""

• mh mas N Y are 5 'N Y

• Et  ? N meme N are are N N 5 y J serop Y N v v **

r_ C - are ~530 Mm nFa N We T3 5A sh N mFe ICT e.S* I*

• nFe mFe M Y mPe 5 n 1 -* Et  ? N meme N m/s mFe N N 5 74 .---- @ sery_ Y,E. v v er mam 4wA-6eangcw V: .. 1s-T r- 7 _ - av -g.-?*--w"mP. M y mTr5 N Y

• Et TN'hswwy K4 g CB-1f P2E e=W erey N Y N N N N s s N 24 12 N 163 % 3 h2 D ts.e 54 M Y IP 1A* f*O * *

• Y Y . to 12 Y Y

• ET  ? N K.SE Y 12* N N N 22 3 cis m troy N Y M N N N s S N 24 12 N 23.5 % D 18.8 34 N Y 1P 1A* I*O * *

• Y N te 12 Y Y

• Et  ? N K,SE M* U* N N N 22 nE am troy N Y N N N N S S Y 24 12 N I.1% D 18.4 54 N Y IP 1A* t*O * *

• Y Y It 12 Y Y

• E?  ? N K.SE Y 12' N N N 12 7: ev end serey Y Y Y N Y m/s C mh a4 '5oo MW m/s N We YV T5 2A m/s N mas ICT & I*O

• mh sh Y M 4 5 m% mFe

• e4  ? N m*me N mh aFe N N 5 77 CD-1f C2E emm ere, N Y N N N N E 5 N 36 It N 17.4 % 3 42 D 11A 47.2 N Y IP 1A* t*O * *

• Y N 5 12 Y Y *  ? N Y 12* N N 34 ET K.SE N so c2E esm eroy Y M Y Y N N 5 5 N 36 6 N 38.9 % D 38.5 249.5 N N IP 1A* t*O * *

• Y Y $ 12 Y Y

• Et  ? N meme Y 12' N N N 34

• 1 K2E emm eroy N Y N N N N s 5 Y 24 12 N 2_t% D ttA 35.4 M Y IP 1A* I*O * *

• Y 88 5 12 Y Y

• ET  ? N K.SE Y 12* N N N 12

• 2 sc2E emm erey Y M Y Y N N S S Y 24 6 N 43 % D 33.8 165 N N IP 1A* I*O * *

• Y Y 9 12 Y Y

• Et  ? M w Y I2* N N N 12 23 IIA 644 pipe Y Y Y N N mas C mFa m#e 3 m/s N m/s TS SA mh ehsh ICT 1A* f*O

• m#e mas M Y 4 6 N Y

• Et  ? N meme N mfe are M N 6 I Y CD6te , sendem Y N N Y M are 5 at mFe 13 sh N m/s T5 de ah N N ICIP.T 1A* I*O * *

• Y N

• 6 Y Y

• Et  ? N meme N mh N N N 6 35 Pts l esmeroy Y N N Y M N 5 S N 36 6 N m's Ts 4s 28 Y*N* IF 1A* t*O * *

• Y Y 3 6 Y Y

• ET  ? N meme N m/s M N N 34 34 greem4 serep Y N N N N m/s C mas mas 500 MCM e4 N are TS 13 =4 N mh ICT 1A* I*O

• mas mFe Y N ab 6 N Y

• Et  ? N mame N m/s m/s N N 6 a.a* ,,,V_

fomea Y N N N N are $ are n/a I mFe N m/s  ? TS 9A e4 N N IP I e* I*O * *

• Y N 3 8 Y Y

• Et  ? N meme Y N N N N 8

! 38 C!rtr' tem.u bC 7 YT Y' -N-W-Y~ We afs N mar-JL.22.5%- 3'12 -J1. 16.9_ m/= N Y ICIF,Y-. -4Ae- 70, *

, J- A._Y N

• SCCF Y 2- Rm a r._Y_ ET _? N 12 N_ K. N 13 r r, CB.4 Cv739 e mdest Y N N N Y mfe 5 m/s mas 3 ab N 37 ?% i et D 173 mh MN IF 43* I* * *

• Y M

• 5 sh Y

• Et  ? N meme Y N N N N 5 '

CW748 sendelt Y N N N Y mh s sh m/. 2_5 sh N 22 9 % D 17.5 m% N N IP.T 83* I* * *

• Y N

• 5 mpe Y

• Et  ? M meme Y N N N N 5 l

Of IFF15SA pape Y N N N N are 5 mFu

• 8 sh M m/s I T3 la e/o mAm ah IC 83* f*

• mas mas Y N mh e ah Y

• Et  ? N **me N m/s are N N $

Y CE2272 eendelt Y M Y N N mh 5 mas e/o 2 are N mt. T3 1.5 mb Ni N ICT 1A* I*

• nFa mas Y N 4 4 .N Y

• Et  ? N meme N m/s We N N 4 C- b- I f.

1 e

I

. - . - - - - - - - .- . -- - - - - - . - . - - - . ~ --

NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo-Lac Project IP-M-340 R/l Attachment D l

l Segment No. Cable Route Segment No. Cable Route CBlFP2E-01 No.10R60 CBlFP2E-01 No.10R60 same as same as l

10113D 10113D Cable number Type Code Weight per Cable number - Type Code Weight per (Ref. 2) (Ref. 2) linear (Ref.2) (Ref. 2) linear foot (#/ft) foot (#/ft)

Ref.5 Ref.5.

LAP 29B 03355 5.9360 IVC 28F 03091 0.3640 1AP34G 02096 0.2630 1VC35B 03091 0.3640 j 1 AP34H 02096 0.2630 1VC35C 03091 0.3640 1 1AP34N 04201 2.8330 IVC 35D 03091 0.3640 l IAP34V 03101 1.7700 IVC 35P 03091 0.3640 1 AP34W 03101 1.7700 IVC 35S 03091 0.3640 1AP37D 03351 5.1670 IVC 36B 03091 0.3640 )

1 AP37J 03351 5.I670 IVC 36C 03091 0.3640 l

^

ICM09H 03061 0.6590 IVC 36D 03091 0.3640 ICM09K 03061 0.6590 IVC 36P 03091 0.3640 1RD31H 03021 1.1920 IVC 360 03091 0.3640  !

1RP02C 04201 2.8330 IVC 50B 03091 0.3640 ISX27A 03091 0.3640 IVC 50C 03091 0.3640 ISX40A 03091 0.3640 IVC 51B 03091 0.3640  ;

ISX51 A 03091 0.3640 IVC 51C 03091 0.3640 1 1SX51D 03091 0.3640 IVC 51D 03091 0.3640 ISX51G 03091 0.3640 IVC 51E 03091 0.3640 I IVC 25B 03091 0.3640 IVC 56B 03091 0.3640 )

IVC 25C 03091- 0.3640 IVC 56C 03091 0.3640 1 1

i IVC 25D 03091 0.3640 IVC 56D 03091 0.3640 IVC 28D 03091 0.3640 IVG38A 03091 0.3640 IVC 26B 03091 0.3640 IVG40A 03091 0.3640 IVC 26C 03091 0.3640 IVQ05A 03091 0.3640 IVC 26D 03091 0.3640 IVQ14A 03091 0.3640 IVC 27B 03091 0.3640 SUB TOTAL 8.736 l

IVC 27C 03091 0.3640 ATOTAD! eMW s i!!43f436i IVC 27D 03091 0.3640 IVC 28B 03091 0.3640 l IVC 28C 03091 0.3640 SUB-TOTAL 34.700 ]

I i

l I

l  ;

I I

cblftxt Page 1 of 8 l

i NSED/Desien & Analysis 4hermo-l.nu Proicca IP-M-340 R/l Attachment D l

Segment No. Cable Route Segment No. Cable Route CBI FC2E-01 No.10R61 CBl FC2E-01 No.10R 61 Cable number Type Code Weight per Cable number Type Code Weight per (Ref. 2) (Ref. 2) linear (Ref.2) (Ref.2) linear foot (#/ft) foot (#/ft)

Ref. 5. Ref.5.

IAP29q 02126 0.1690 ILVl4F 02096 0.2630 l 1AP60B 12126 0.6590 ILVl4G 02096 0.2630 i

1AP60C 03096 0.3180 ILVl4H 02096 0.2630 1HG11H 03126 0.2210. ILVI4J 02096 0.2630 1 IHGilK 03126 0.2210. ILVl4K 02096 0.2630 llP04A 03126 0.2210 ILVl4L 02096 0.2630 l 1IP04B 02096 0.2630 1LV14M 02096 0.2630 ILV12A 02096 0.2630 ILVl4P 02126 0.2630 ILVl4B 02096 0.2630 1RA01F 02126 0.1690 ILVl4C 02096 0.2630 IVC 25P 04126 0.2650 1RP35B 02096 0.2630 1VC25Q 04126 0.2650 ISC08G 02126 0.2630 IVC 26E 04126 0.5160 ISX27B 02126 0.2630 IVC 27G 04126 0.5160 ISX31B 09126 0.5160 IVC 270 04126 0.2650 l ISX40B 09126 0.5160 IVC 27P 04126 0.2650 1SX51B 12126 0.6590 IVC 27Q 04126 0.2650 1SX5iC 09126 0.5160 IVC 27R 02096 0.2630 ISX51E 12126 0.6590 IVC 28E 09126 0.5160 ISX51F 09126 0.5160 IVC 35G 15126 0.7990 ISX51H 09126 0.5160 IVC 35T 04126 0.2650 ISX513 09126 0.5160 IVC 35U 04126 0.2650 ISX51M 09126 0.5160 IVC 35W 04126 0.2650 ISX51Q 09126 0.5160 IVC 36G 15126 0.7990 ISX51T 09126 0.5160 IVC 36R 15126 0.7990 ISX52C 09126 0.5160 IVC 36S 04126 0.2650  !

ISX52F 09126 0.5160 IVC 40A 02126 0.1690 l ISX52J 09126 0.5160 IVC 40E 07126 0.3830 l ISX54L 09126 0.5160 IVC 40L 07126 0.3830 ISX54P 12126 0.6590 IVC 45A 15126 0.7990 ISX66A 02126 0.2630 IVC 45B 15126 0.7990 IVC 02C 12126 0.6590 IVC 45C 15126 0.7990 IVC 04C 12126 0.6590 IVC 45D 15126 0.7990 IVC 06B 12126 0.6590 IVC 45E 15126 0.7990 IVC 08B 12126 0.6590 IVC 45F 09126 0.5160 IVCl2C 12126 0.6590 IVC 45G 15126 0.7990 IVCl4B 15126 0.7990 IVC 45H 15126 0.7990 IVC 25G 09126 0.5160 IVC 46C 15126 0.7990 IVC 250 04126 0.2650 IVC 46D 15126 0.6590 ILVl4D 02096 0.2630 IVC 46E 15126 0.7990 ILVl4E 02096 0.2630 IVC 46F 15126 0.7990 SUBTOTAL 17.999 SUBTOTAL 18.966 cblftxt Page 2 of 8

i l NSI'D/ Design & Analvsis/Thermo-I,ar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Attachment D Segment No. Cable Route Segment No. Cable Route CBIFC2E-01 No.10R61 CBIFC2E-01 No.10R61

. Cable number Type Code Weight per Cable number Type Code Weight per l l (Ref.2) (Ref 2) linear (Ref.2) (Ref.2) linear foot (#/f1) foot (#/A)

Ref.5. Ref.5.

IVC 46G 15126 0.7990 IVF07J 09126 0.5160

IVC 47C 04126 0.2650 IVF13G 04126 0.2650 IVC 50D 12126 0.6590 IVF86A 04164 0.1180 IVC 50K 04126 0.2650 IVG32G 02126 0.1690 4

IVC 50L 04126 0.2650 IVG32M 04126 0.2650 4

IVC 50M 02096 0.2630 IVG38B 15126 0.7990 4

IVC 51F 12126 0.6590 IVG38E 04126 0.2650 IVCSIT 04126 0.2650 IVG38F 09126 0.5160 f 0.7990 IVC 51U 04126 0.2650 IVG40B 15126 IVC 51V 04126 0.2650 IVG95C 04164 0.1180 l

1VC5iW 04126 0.2650 1VP20L 02096 0.2630 IVC 56E 12126 0.6590 IVQ05B 15126 0.7990 IVC 56N 04126 0.2650 IVQl4B 12126 0.6509  !

l IVC 560 04126 0.2650 IVR05Q 04126 0.2650

(

IVC 56P 04126- 0.2650 1VR05V 04126 0.2650 IVC 57S 02126 0.1690 IVR18C 12126 0.6590 IVC 57T 02126 0.1690 IVX25C 02126 0.1690  ;

IVC 66A 24164 0.4590 IVX28F 12126 0.6590 l IVC 68A 16163 0.5920 IVX28K 12126 0.6590 l IVC 68B 16163 0.5920 IVX28N 02126 0.1690 IVC 70A 24164 0.4590 IVX28P 02126 0.1690  ;

l IVC 70D 04163 0.2270 SUBTOTAL 8.5569 1VDl8D 02096 0.2630 LTOTAL; F54.600T IVC 70E 24164 0.4590 SUBTOTAL 9.078 Segment No. Cable Route CBl FC2E-02 No.10R51 Cable number Type Code Weight per linear foot

(#/ft)

Same as Same as 67.867 CBlFC2E-05 CBlFC2E-05 ISX66A 02126 0.1690 iTOTAIJm m - fa - M68.036s cbiftxt Page 3 of 8 l

l

. - , . - . -- . - . . . . . . .- - . . - . - ~ = . - . .=. -- _ - - -

T )

NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo-Lar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Attachment D  :

r i

Segment No. Cable Route  !

CBIFC2E-03 No.10R50  !

Cable number Type Code Weight per ,

linear foot

. (#/ft) <

Same as Same as 68.036  !

CBlFC2E-02 CBlFC2E . -

02 iTOTAI)M6"*itsAP " , ;" A98 268.036sjP i Segment No. Cable Route CBlFC2E-04 No.10200E Cable number Type Code Weight per linear foot

(#/ft)  !

68.036  :

Same as Same as CBlFC2E-03 CBIFC2E-  !

03 f

?TOTAUL%-+ ene as .168.036s i

i i

i

}

1 cblftxt Page 4 of 8 i

- , ,~ - _ _ . .- . ~- - - . - . - - - . - . - - _ _ - - . . - .-. . .

i i

NSI'D/Desien & Analnisfrhermo-Luc Proicct IP-M-0340 R/3 Attachment D ,

Segment No. Cable Route Segment No. Cable Route CB1FC2E-05 No.10R138 CHI FC2E-05 No.10R138 i & 10199E & 10199E l Cable number Type Code Weight per Cable number Type Code Weight per (Ref.2) (Ref.2) linear (Ref. 2) (Ref.2) linear

, foot (#/ft) foot (#/ft)  ;

Ref.5 Ref. 5.

IAP21K 02163 0.0920 ILVl4K 02096 0.2630-IAP21L 02126 0.1690 ILVl4L 02096 0.2630 1AP23L 02163 0.0920 ILVl4M 02096 0.2630

$ IAP23M 02126 0.1690 ILVl4P 02096 0.2630 i IAP29Q 02126 0.1690 IPS10N 07126 0.3830 1AP60B 12126 0.6590 IPS10P 07126 0.3830 ,

1AP60C 03096 0.3180 1PS1OS 04126 0.2650 i I

ICM07L 02096 0.2630 IPS10T 04126 0.2650 2 ICZO2B 02096 0.2630 1RA0lF 02126 0.1690

, IDG21 A 15126 0.7990 1RH04J 07126 0.3830

1DG21B 15126 0.7990 1RH34D 03126 0.2210 j IDG21C 15126 0.7990 1RH57D 07126 0.3830 IDG21F 04096 0.3900 IRH65 A 02126 0.1690 IDG21K 07126 0.3830 1R119C 12126 0.6590 IDG21M 07126 0.3830 1RP35B 02096 0.2630 1DG3iC 04096 0.3900 1SCO2G 15126 0.7990 1DG31D 04096 0.3900 ISC08G 02126 0.1690 IDG31E 03096 0.3180 ISF07A 07126 0.3830 1DG31F 03096 0.3180 1SX29B 09126 0.5160 IDG31K 04126 0.2650 ISX29C 09126 0.5160 IDG31R 02163 0.0920 ISX31C 09126 0.5160 IDG31S 07126 0.3830 ISX40C 09126 0.5160 IDG31T 07126 0.3830 ISX51C 09126 0.5160 ID002B 09126 0.5160 ISX51F 09126 0.5160 ID002C 12126 0.6590 ISX51J 09126 0.5160 lHGilE 12126 0.6590 ISX51M 09126 0.5160 lHGilF 12126 0.6590 ISX51Q 09126 0.5160 IHGill 03126 0.2210 ISX51T 09126 0.5160 llP04A 02096 0.2630 ISX52C 09126 0.5160 11PO4B 02096 0.2630 1SX52F 09126 0.5160 ILD08J 02126 0.1690 ISX523 09126 0.5160 ILVl4A 02096 0.2630 ISX54C 09126 0.5160 ILVl48 02096 0.2630 ISX54L 09126 0.5160 iLVI4C 02096 0.2630 1SX54P 12126 0.6590 j ILVl4D 02096 0.2630 IVC 02C 12126 0.6590 ILVl4E 02096 0.2630 IVC 04C 12126 0.6590 ILVl4F 02096 0.2630 IVC 06B 12126 0.6590 ILVl4G 02096 0.2630 IVC 08B 12126 0.6590 ILVl4H 02096 0.2630 IVCl2C 12126 0.6590 iLV141 02096 0.2630 IVC 14B 15126 0.7990 l

-SUBTOTAL I4.062 SUBTOTAL 18.439 1

cbiftxt Page 5 of 8

. -- . - . - _ - . . . _ - . . . - . -- - . - _ . - . ~. . . - - - - . . . . - ,

1 NSED/ Design & Analuis/Thermo-Lau Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Attachment D Segment No. . Cable Ro.ute Segment No. Cable Route CBIFC2E-05 No.10R138 CBIFC2E-05 No.10R138

, & 10199E & 10199E i Cable number Type Code Weight per Cable number Type Code Weight per (Ref. 2) (Ref. 2) linear (Ref.2) (Ref.2) linear  !

foot (#/ft) foot (#/ft)

Ref.5. Ref.5.

IVC 40A 02126 0.1690 IVG04C 12126 0.6590 IVC 40E 07126 0.3830 IVG06B 15126 0.7990 IVC 40L 07126 0.3830 IVG08C 09126 0.5160 .

IVC 45A 15126 0.7990 IVG08G 09126 0.5160  !

IVC 45B - 15126 0.7990 IVG12F 12126 0.6590 i IVC 45C 15126 0.7990 IVG18C 12126 0.6590 IVC 45D 15126 0.7990 IVG20F 12126 0.6590 IVC 45E 15126 0.7990 IVG26F 12126 0.6590 IVC 45F 09126 0.5160 IVG32G 02126 0.1690 IVC 45G 15126 0.7990 IVG32H 15126 0.7990 IVC 45H 15126 0.7990 IVG323 12126 0.6590 IVC 46B 15126 0.7990 IVG38C 04126 0.2650 IVC 46C 15126 0.7990 IVG40C 04126 0.2650 IVC 46D 12126 0.6590 IVG91B 08163 0.3640 IVC 46E 15126 0.7990 IVG92B 16163 0.5920 IVC 46F 15126 0.7990 IVG93B 04163 0.2270 IVC 46G 15126 0.7990 IVG93C 04164 0.1180 1VC47C 04126 0.2650 1VG95C 04164 0.I180 1VC66A 24164 0.4590 iVG95E 04163 0.2270  :

IVC 68A 16163 0.5920 IVQ05B 15126 0.7990 IVC 68B 16163 0.5920 IVQ08E 12126 0.6590 ,

IVC 70A 24164 0 4590 IVQl4B 12126 0.6590 1VC70D 04163 0.7270 IVR05Q 04126 0.2650 IVC 70E 24164 0.4590 IVR05V 04126 0.2650 IVD02D 07126 0.3830 IVR18C 12126 0.6590 IVD02E 09126 0.5160 IVX25C 02126 0.1690 IVD02F 04126 0.2650 IVX28F 12126 0.6590 IVD05B 12126 0.6590 IVX28K 12126 0.6590 IVD05C 07126 0.3830 IVX28N 02126 0.1690 IVD18C 02126 0.1690 IVX28P 02126 0.1690 IVF07J 09126 0.5160 IWO5D 07126 0.3830 l IVF13G 04126 0.2650 IVY 06F 07126 0.3830 IVF86A 04164 0.1180 IVYO7F 07126 0.3830

! IVG02B 15126 0.7990 IVYll A 01176 0.1690 IVG02C 07126 0.3830 IVY 13C 04126 0.2650 IVG04B 09126 0.5160 SUBTOTAL 15.643 SUBTOTAL 19.723 'ETOTAUF ' ' We% we67.867W l

cblftxt Page 6 of 8

- .. . . - - . . -- .. - .- . . . . - ~ .. - . . . ... . . . . ,

i i i

l f NSED/Desien & Analvsis/Thermo-Lar Proicct IP-M-0340 R/1 Attachment D I I

Segment No. Cable Route CBIFK2E-01 No.10R62 l l Cable number . Type Code - Weight per ,

linear foot  !

(#/ft) Ref. 5. l IVC 83D 02163 0.0920 IVC 83F 02163 0.0920  !

IVC 83G 03164 0.0520 l IVC 86B 02163 0.0920 1VC86C 03164 0.0520 j IVC 87B 02163 0.0920 IVC 910 02163 0.0920 1VC91R 02163 0.0920 IVC 93D 02163 0.0920 1VC94B 02163 0.0920 IVC 94E 02163 0.0920 1VC95F 02163 0.0920 iTOTAl2s "*N c a

• l1;024?

Segment No. Cable Route CBlFK2E-02 No.10R50 Cable number Type Code Weight per linear foot

(#/ft)

Same as Same as CBlFK2E-04 CB lFK2E-04 TOTAla '

• ?3.8994 Segment No. Cable Route CBlFK2E-03 No.10R50

& 10200F Cable number Type Code Weight per linear foot

(#/ft)

Same as Same as CBlFK2E-02 CBI FK2E-02

TOTADP * - -

• S3.8992 cbtftxt Page 7 of 8

NSED/Desien & Analysis /Thermo-Lac Proicct IP-M-0340 R/l Attachment D Segment No. Cable Route Segment No. Cable Route CBlFK2E-04 No.10199F CBlFK2E-04 No.10199F

& 10200F & 10200F Cable number Type Code Weight per Cable number Type Code Weight per (Ref. 2) (Ref. 2) linear (Ref.2) (Ref. 2) linear foot (#/ft) foot (#/ft)

Ref.5. Ref.5. j IDG80A 04163 0.2270 IVC 86C 03164 0.0520 l l IDO78A 02163 0.0920 IVC 87B 02163 0.0920 l ID078B 02163 0.0920 IVC 91Q 02163 0.0920 ,

ILD26E 02166 0.0880 IVC 91R 02163 0.0920 )

ILD26F 02166 0.0880 IVC 93D 02163 0.0920 ILD26G 02166 0.0880 IVC 948 02163 0.0920 l I

. ILD28A 02166 0.0880 IVC 94E 02163 0.0920 ILD28C 02166 0.0880 IVC 95F 02163 0.0920 ILD28D 02166 0.0880 IVG77A 02163 0.0920 ILD44D 02166 0.0880 IVG81 A 02163 0.0920 l ILD44E 02166 0.0880 IVG82A 02163 0.0920 ILD44F 02166 0.0880 IVG85A 02163 0.0920 l ILD45D 02166 0.0880 IVG85B 03163 0.1140 )

i ILD45E 02166 0.0880 IVG86A 02163 0.0920 ILD45F 02166 0.0880 IVG86B 03163 0.1140  !

ILD61D 02166 0.0880 IVG87V 02163 0.0920 ILD61E 02166 0.0880 IVG88C 02163 0.0920 ILD61F 02166 0.0880 IVC 88D 02163 0.0920 IVC 83D 02163 0.0920 IVG88F 02163 0.0920 IVC 83F 02163 0.0920 ILD28B 02166 0.0880  ;

IVC 83G 03164 0.0520 SUBTOTAL 1.84  ;

IVC 86B 02163 0.0920 ' TOTAL 4 >

sk3.8992  !

SUBTOTAL 2.059 Segment No. Cable Route CBlFK2E-05 No.10R137 Cable number Type Code Weight per linear foot

(#/ft)

Same as Same as CBIFK2E-04 CBl FK2E-04 iTOTAIF^ '

WW3.8992 cblftxt Page 8 of 8 I

L _ __ _ _.

i Illinois Power Company Nuclear Station Encineerine Dcoartmcnt  :

l P. O. Box 678 i Clinton. IL 61727 A ( IM EA)I E. .

(217) 935-8881 RECORD OF COORDINATION Y-104476 Prepared by R.P. .R. Wisond -

Date 11/21/94 Copies to B.T. Ford File Code B51-1800-94(11-21)-e RCCL No. l i

i l

l Meeting Telecon x Other i

Date 11/14/94 and 11/21/94 -

Time 0900 and 1100  ;

)

Panicipants R.P. Bhat (NSED) S.R. Wilson (NAD), and Cal Banning, Vectra (817) 737-1145 Subject Thermo-Lag Panet Thickness NEl Tested vs. CPS As-Installed.

SUMMARY

The following question arose during the generation of the CPS AS-Installed Thermo-Lag Fire Endurance calculations.

The NEl Test samples are stated to be 1/2" nominal with tolerance of +1/8", -0", and 1" nominal with tolerance of i

+1/4"., -0". The CPS purchase specifications called for 1/2" and 1" minimum panels. Would the NEi tests be applicable to CPS 7 i

Ram called Cal on 11/14/94 and Simon called on 11/21./4. Mr. Banning was called because he was the prime techical coordinator for NEl during the TSI-NEl fire tests conducted at Omega Point Labs. Cal stated that the

+1/8", -0" and 1/4", -0" tolerances were provided because QA acceptance criteria for the panels required tolerances.

There was a special effort made during the NEl tests to ensure that the panels vere closer to 1/2" and 1" This was done by shaving off excess materialin some cases.

The NEl 1/2", +1/8", -0" and 1", +1/4". -0" panels vould envelop the CPS panels because CPS panels were at least 1/2" and 1" thick.

i l

1 ATTACHMENT A.3-1

+

e m.a m men.3QG.WX . -

' AM& ,

& :4M8 was >

.a f.m%. g p.a w n. m w, n .n gh w 8 -

o @m,w, M &.,sp d w @_ r.,l W ~ m' '; -

l '%WMQQ% ~..

?. 5$WMpf. FILE, D219M /d - a[8-Li C. . .

m v w. .. -.~ .ygnw e- -

j+ - rg:+ ~ 4. ., ,

ddO IV/

RhV. "1 CALCULATION #

m. w . m,.p. e a. . -

.,. L

.s .a.. s w.,w i .

n l ..

.o$.1 TOTAL PAGES ' U

,. w,m, ...-w. ,

s p .

.,  ;%. . cw t.y .

1 W

CONTENTS OF D21 FILESWP.c ,

u.m y./v W .p Gyo @W . i.M~

t . .-J .. ..,.o s. g ,g , , ,

~Y l

.~ ',fr ?$..kj m h. 4, =tYy.s  % 4 l, lr.,o%,OW.' o . ',%l,llnl.: , h;, V' ' '

~

TITLE /DEk,REPTIbNMM@MN,N.Nkca

d[ n FORMNUMBER: '

ppp_m 1 '4ye.m ,. s ag gw-

• p ,

M . .. - . ,n. my Q;p

s. .

W p -

, gf ;ggf MsgD S " q".ggeppywp- _ _

.A m

..s '

3s #w . m,, - ,q. .._w.._g.

.f g r.

. ' s l h'" *. _7,. , .

I h;f; y ,vl. ~

+..

< w a.

_ . . , a. .

s..

y.E.hpk"f@g%.,Q,m,'Q.kQi'Qf%f

,s .

S 2;9".; GL(i,yg.pg $$.#

gg,

m. .

v./q ~ v.v c.,q

.' r f [ " ,'.J.- r .t I.) b f f ) /1 "*

N NE' h .N h, 2 l

.$'h'h ?.r: . . ,, . "$ p p m (<TQ$$. '

\

pmw m.

. . g e .yn.y.

nqin ~eygm.g3,gs.m.w n.4~y.y v g9

g. + .- #3o .:

etyg.y. gwyfi.;q ,- pp w

, m.m. .

4.ms -

..s.t *

,, 8' I q. J * .

• 4-1

\

, w 4p,g')y

. ' mm..,.

e -

w m Ja a m p ' x .

i.

V . t

f' ' '* 6 h. $

e,

?l $

,. .e ..  ;

1 l

. , v;w . .c; a;< 1

\

l

. 1 a- .w'. '~

• kM3 . g,.. 4 C. . 2.3, ' p *

.! i f : . < %s!: &g..'r' rk 't A ,,-i3l[? Q,$.p(;ni..'fQit V'v % .i

~

n I

8 4.

d l .F 1 l

,4,' * %lA - l j

L ,;.y .. . .u y / 9. . ~

,. 6 Y.Q:~. Q Q $.' Q ljf,f;.lfy

>.s 4

, e ,6 -

e.1X=,,.5... . * * ,

a:l. " . b 3 5 . 4' h .'M'..pj '..

.W ,, ps yl%w.4 !V y ,i-494.wfj.qJ

?.', 3a t .3.

. v j r

4 Y;* -4 - . _ ', *

,.=

o'r w g 4 g s _

n . . . . . .- .+.m m w > n 1 luk, < * .

gr i..

. ,.n ytd ~.

,i) Y6.( j 6: &*

b.

~+

I v: . . . , . . :.~ .~

8 g gh

" b . @w6 s

/.%

A Tg' n f + . '.7 -,,

'? , ,

I W9 #f t

• h' '

.spp w g,,4. f%'..g' g e , ,; . - .

,.., y uf a g

• f *8 ./g *

./_ '.- , 4 .., 9 l

\

.e.

r.., ,

. u.. g.

q. ....

),

t *

.,,? "Ip .'"8 . 4- *,y .

( ,

WJMM&w b 4% ^

y ) .,,L.+

3;9.g y e:

.,p. ;9 >

l Q- y,( , . ,

.e. yr,. p: - '

k $' ov a?g 3. ydim ~ ,n y.p a p,

=..p c Q.we, p.

g a.n. ..n, y 4 qy n 9.u. ~. ~ ts .

. . ~ m;q .n, .. .

,.Q,, <y. . . ,

l ~ h/h : CALC 100

&4 .

.s;@MQ1 w .+ $. G M ffy N ^ $ .

h' .

%u. % ,

.f,uld%"p.'.4G.,7$pf.v,..r'N.g.%.v w, :6. . :.  ;

y yp . . ~ tg; ;. q - un a % -

.dG's#%4 gn@7f W .

. . . /'h,y!n? ,

.r -

DISK 2

.s gy m3.q,.ps 4 yegar m..m;/4G!/.;wv.ggqp.

s m ,s ,m ,- . ? ;*t a. w Jc ,x' 4;.0 m;ys 4m.4,g w ,. % _ . gip

. e 3 '

.',. n; ps @ p.... w s ., t.i':r.g r -

e.

1 l

.m.- e .A e l - - -. - n.:. 3 1

M FILE D2194( /d- / -

L f -///- 88 O

. CALCULATION # REV. /] V/

l TOTAL PAGES 3  !

CONTENTS OF D21 FILE

r. -e.

FORM NUMBER TITLE /DESCRIPTIONi ,

i dh9d n _ , W.i-NSED COMMENT CONTROdFORM '#

JC NF-258 +p; .,s. </

.. a. r. w ...n_ . .  :.,.

NF-2141 & 2 DESIGN VERIFICATION ~CHECKLISTE - ^+ W ,  ;

. l l

- u.Jo t"&J O, f fp 1

1 1

j 1

I

.7b +

,1

,-t- . * ,=,,

,d 14 . : e3 e) , s V/p- ed

• ,#d M' ' '

.i.. ,

d e; .

b-

.e<

ahi 's a 4

,%y, ,

' . r y , f

. s s , g/+,. .

f'- g # ie

, p

. 99;,,, < e< s"' g, ' -

h, i y ;p f ' ' ',l ,

• ? y '

s l&

-a ..;g . ,%

z, 3, ; w , ef2g.ry' .,,

, ' .t_

.,p, i to ::M e . *

• f)

Hi_

&:?jb . .; calc 100 9;fyg!g@, .;.c;..:zs f.- .:,.

w. ; >.x,w,giafilf%r w .m 4

, .4..,

n=

. ;  :$g.c

.i

.,r. f 4#

T J

1. i . ," ,,a 9:j:.l3i';

%'J .:' d!,_[ l; .[-

d *

' g ; --

, <  ;}.

&.T;;;'p:t.rl' a ,a v tf . d ,

"x, , ,

,,Ih,s,,bl2$.[.s h, a,b. a ,

,