ML20094G403
| ML20094G403 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 08/09/1984 |
| From: | Bauser D METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Linenberger G, Smith I, Wolfe S Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| SP, NUDOCS 8408130300 | |
| Download: ML20094G403 (22) | |
Text
b 90L gu\\TED COhe5PCMDENCE SHAW, PITTMAN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A PARTNERSMep OF PROFESdlONAL CORPORATIONS 1800 M $TREET, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C.
g US*C un=,nnA%
m:m: vu",ms.
m "a~ a " ::.
7.Jn.'
m,n"L..,E e
G 1CRGE F. TROweniDGE. P.C.
wlNTMROP N. GRO*N, P.C.
DAv'OJ.CYNAMON ST ANLEY M. 3 ARG
-E L C A FF,P.
AND L3 MEL. C
'l O '
u SE A MATHEws R
'N' A 5 Ru LEDGE M
UROEN sk fg7t,@C MAYvEy N PC O
O g S 8N'S
.C.
404 822-ION & 82&M 4,,q f
OTM'Y MAN A S DELosSA' A. Rf DGWAy STEPMEN 5. MElMANN
@" RGE M ROGERS JR., P C.
STEVE N M. LUCAS. p C.
,,JQ lV
'mENNETM J MauTMAN SANDRA E BRUSCA FRED A. LTTTLE P C.
DAvs0 M RUSENSTriN, p C.
JOHN 3. RMINEL ANDER, P C.
M ATIAS F. TRAveE SO-OiA2. P C.
DaveD LA*RENCE MrLLER EILEEN L. BROWNELL LL. P C.
VECTOR,A J. PEnniNS. P C.
RApiFAX 100 FREDERfCm L. MLEiN A"AMEL A M. ANDERSON C m'JCE w. CMuRCM'ON. JR.. A JOMN M O NE ELL, JR.. P C.
STEVEN P. PtTLER LE N ANDER D. TOM ASZCZum LE LIE A. NeCMOLS R
JE FFRE f J. A. GBSS mal. TIN O. M RALL, P C.
J AV A. E DSTtE N, p C.
(202)8224072.
EL'CM ARD J PARRiNO yQ"j
- Dg, MEN Co JJev E. SsLSE RG. P C JE FFERY L. VABLON. #A M ARIE N. COLANQ*
LEN A. FREDEL SAngARA M. ROSSOTTI, P C J ACM Mcu tY. p C.
- ROBE RT C. SOEMM ORG E V. ALL EN, JR., P.C.g ELISABETH M. PENOLETON iL 6
y gL g g gg f
N WEES EN P.C.
TM AS M c
4 CM D ANE
.BURMLEY' AJ N ELSTEIN
"'!"^*;'o't:.""CS t" " *-
- '2"S"M*^ ","lTA NG E
"-'"'($"^*****)
h,!,"*EL' c"JI"oEN gano "ogwmA,,,
w CA LETON $
N'E S # C J MN L.
A R JR JuO TH A
.DLER N E M A'gw,A THOMAS A SANTE R, P C.
PMsLip J. MARVEY ANGREW O. ELLIS oAvio R 5
LMELDON J. WEISEL. p C.
ROSE RT M. GORDON RICHAmo A. SAMp A, Raymic, ggigwyoN wi e
OC "'.,*J4"c"'"""
0 :'O'"w?$ n"" N "
W L"!M "A".'M.%C.
"8""JO'M"?!n'F' AMAN
^
^c v'a*'a'a o"'c' G
C'Ji" 40'ld0"^
^#4 to "".EC
$"'" iu"Mi'n. ".*C.*
!!8?T '"AA"."E'IG"
'$ c"^ "" c"'o o"'v' C
ER
~^"!NM i? M"' "A*** * *
- &*MJE A J"#C.'ERM' N C 7"M"O'M"A S'k. ".ci,n.
E="IM'.'n"
- ^
N!
"c"a a v' "$ '"'^ "*
- N, a,.
.m.
. e.
aMN, DEwv.
m.
v.
mL SCOTT CUSTER, JR.
RICHARD S. SEATTY COUNSEL WROTE R S D4 RECT OtAL NUMGER August 9, 1984 (202) 822-1215 Administrative Judges Ivan W.
Smith, Chairman Sheldon J. Wolfe Gustave A.
Linenberger, Jr.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comisison Washington, D.C.
20555 In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Company (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1)
Docket No. 50-289-d Restart - Remand) of Dear Chairman Smith and Administrative Judges Wolfe and Linenberger:
In accordance with Licensee's practice of notifying the Licensing Board, the Appeal Board and the parties of new infor-mation on issues of potential interest, enclosed is a copy of the most recent status report on Licensee's progress towards completion of required actions identified in the February, 1983 BETA Report, along with the cover memorandum transmitting the report from Mr. P. R. Clark, President, GPU Nuclear, to the 8408130300 840809 PDR ADOCK 05000289 o
4 SHAW, PITTMAN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A PARTNEmSMip Osr pmOrtSesONAL COmpORATIONS Ivan W. Smith, Esquire Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esquire Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr.
2-August 9, 1984 Page 2 Chairman of the Board of Directors, GPU Nuclear.
This status report constitutes the fourth such report prepared by Licensee.
Earlier reports were transmitted to the Appeal Board and the parties by Licensee's counsel on July 26 and November 3, 1983, and March 15, 1984.
Sincarely,
[d.rnNs h bmv Deborah B. Bauser Counsel for Licensee DBB:jah Enclosure cc:
Service List 4
9 N
o Y
,,, c:::
- us.n. c
'84 A2010 R059 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of
)
)
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-289 SP
)
Restart (Three Mile Island Nuclear
)
Station, Unit No. 1)
)
Service List Administrative Judge Chairman, Atomic Safety &
Ivan W. Smith Licensing Board Panel Chairman, Atomic Safety &
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Licensing Board Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Chairman, Atomic Safety &
Licensing Appeal Board Panel Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Sheldon J. Wolfe Commission Atomic Safety & Licensing Washington, " C.
20555 Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Thomas Y. Au, Esq.
Commission Gifice of Chief Counsel Washington, D.C.
20555 Dept. of Environmental Resources i
H 505 Executive House i
Administrative Judge P.O. Box 2357 Gustave A.
Linenberger, Jr.
Harrisburg, PA 17120 Atomic Safety & Licensing l
Board l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Jack Goldberg, Esq.
l Office of Executive Legal Dtr.
l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory l
Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 l
l L
O Docketing & Service Section Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq.
Office of the Ss.cretary William S. Jordan, III, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Harmon, Weiss & Jordan Commission 2001 S Street N.W.,
Suite 430 Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20009 Mr. Norman Aamodt Lynne Bernabei, Esq.
R.
D.
5 Government Accountability Coatesville, PA 19320 Project 1555 Connecticut Avenue Joanne Doroshow, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20009 The Christic Institute 1324 North Capitol Street Washington, D.C.
20002 Ms. Louise Bradford TMI ALERT Mr. Henry D.
Hukill 1011 Green Street Vice President Harrisburg, PA 17102 GPU Nuclear Corporation P.O.
Box 480 Administrative Judge Middletown, PA 17057 Gary J. Edles, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Michael F. McBride, Esq.
Appeal Board LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Commission Suite 1100 Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20036 Administrative Judge Michael W.
Maupin, Esq.
John H. Buck Hunton & Williams Atomic Safety & Lf. censing 707 East Main Street Appeal Board P.O. Box 1535 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Richmond, VA 23212 Commission Administrative Jrdge Christine N. Kohl Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory i
Washington, D.C.
20555 I
m
RELATED COlillESPONDENCf Nuclear memorandum First Half 1984 Status Update - GPUNC 00cp7 July 59584
Subject:
Responses to Recommendations of Basic Date:
Energy Technology Associates, Inc.
Set Forth in Their Report dated February 28, 1983
P. R. Clark, President Location:
P arsippany To:
Chairman, GPU Nuclear Corporation Board of Directors A commitment was made to the Board to provide a periodic report on prog-ress toward completion of required actions identified in the BETA Report.
The first half 1984 Status Update is attached, in which 3 additional items have been completed, leaving 29 of an original 156 recommended actions in progress or under evaluation. Of these, 20 are due for raview or completion in the second half of 1984 and the remainder in 1985.
This Status Update will also be provided to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board through the offices of Shaw, Pittman, Potts, and Trowbridge.
P. R. Clark PRC/FID/ej p Attachment cc: GPUNC Board of Directors GPUNC Directors H. M. Dieckamp R. P. Fasulo L. L. Humphreys P. B. Fiedler E. E. Kintner I. R. Finfrock W. G. Kuhns W. L. Gifford R. V. Laney R. W. Heward l
J. R. Inva H. D. Hukill i
J. F. O' leary B. K. Kanga F. J. Smith R.
L.
Iong W. A. Verrochi F. F. Manganaro i
W. F. Witzig D. G. Murray i
R. F. Wilson i
l i
{
AC000648 S.83 i
n
e n
<ls
&=
8 1
h
- *b!i, a
i!!'hI y.
MQ R 85 l
3 Preface The review of current and projected expenditures and manpower utilization for GPU Nuclear Corporation conducted by Basic Energy Technology Associates, Inc. (BETA) was issued in a report dated February 28, 1983.
The focus of the review was on resources devoted to Three Mile Island Unit 1 and Dyster Creek. A total of eicpty-five (85) findings resulted in one hundred fifty-six (156) separate recommendations.
i This report represents the CPUNC Response. The 156 recommendations (paraphrased) have been assigned to one of five (5) broad categories:
I.
Organization - understanding and working within the functional CPUN structure.
i j
II. Mannina - appropriate staffing levels.
III. Operatino/ Management Efficiency / Productivity IV.
Personnel-Related Matters - personnel practices.
V.
Training Within each of the above categories, responses have been placed into one of five classifications (STATUS CODE):
A.
Araree - Complete: agree with recommendation, action is complete.
B.
Aare - Action Underway / Coals agree with recommendation, action is underway and/or action is a 1983 goal.
C.
Agree - Action to be Scheduled: agree with recommendation, action to be taken in the future.
D.
Under - Evaluation either recommendation or appropriate action is under evaluation.
I E.
Disaarees disagree with recomunendation.
This report is sorted by BETA finding and recommendation and includes only OPEN items.
q The GPLNC Response Report (sorted by BETA finding) will be updated semi-annually until completion. This revi-sion contains the first half 1984 updated status. Since the last update, 3 additional open items have been completed (as noted by asterisk in the comment colunn) for a total complete or disagree of 127 with twenty due for review or completion in 1984 and the remainder in 1985.
7/20/84
=S l
l l 2 w
a e w
{
4 A A A 4
??
5 8
5 E
S IE
.a g
5 u 3
.s 5
1.o g
5%
8
~
l *5 a 8 g%T e 8 c
2 8 3 ;
5 2
- aa.a: :
a W
5 3 g :5 3 5j 5o a
.e y
g j1j:5. 8
- 3" e
a
=
8 28
.g Eg~3 a
o a
9 a
3-E s I a -l $ 2
' iC E
C a8
~
assjs.[3,ml3.
a 2 s
=
s w
i J
Y
+
...n.
O
F 7/20/84 BETA FINDING /
STATUS
- ECGeEND.
PARAP@ASED REmMEPDATION & StNMARY RESPONSE
[A T.
DIVISION CIDE CDHENTS A
Findina III-C:
Nintenance at TMI-l can improve its support of the plant.
III-C (b)
Rect Assign system responsibility in Plant Engineering I.
THI-1 B
4th Q 1984 l-for maintenance tasks.
Resp:
(br goal remains to assign responsibility for each plant system to a specific engineer; i.e., establish a program of " system experts".
Due to hicper priority work in prepetion for restart, the formal implementation of this l
program has not yet been completed althou@,
-l in practicality, it is in use. Formal es-l tablishment of the program is targeted for I
completion in 4th Q 1984.
l' III-C (c)
Rec Delay assigiment of corrective maintenance I.
0/P C
lot Q 1985 l
function to WJ mtil after thit I restart.
Resp Formal assignment of 04 function to MEC will l
not take place until after January 1,1985.
l Findina III-C-1: The warehouse inventory records have enou@ nomenclature inaccuracies to degrade efficiency.
III-G-1 Rect Program to improve nomenclature of inventory records.
III.
Admin./
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 i Resp:
Physical inventory complete. Warehouse discrepancy 1MI-1/
reports being used effectively and service has in-M&C M&C Division will support proved significantly. Items procured via 49MS since Materials Management in this l 12/82 have sigiificantly improved noun nomenclature.
effort to improve nomencle-l The remaining items, however, continue to reflect ture of inventory records.
ll inaccurate descriptions and an effort has been ini-tiated by Materials Management to provide additional manpower resources to undertake the task of nomen-clature improvements for items which have receipt /
l issue activity. This is la long term project and l
will require sub, intial effort to fully implement.
l As the surplus material is eliminated in the TMi l
warehouse, the total magnitude and significance of the problem will be recbeed. Tectnical Functions and Materials Nnagement are jointly proposing establishment of a mit to assigri consistent and l
accepted nomenclature. These efforts must be concheted in parallel with rechetion of surplus inventory items which is part of ongoing Warehouse Reassessment Program. Will be statuaed again at ll the end of 1984. )
7/20/84 BETA FIPOING/
SWATUS RECGespe.
PARAPHRASED ECOMEWATION & Sl3 MARY RESPONSE
,CA,T,.
DIVISION C(DE COMENTS A
Findina III-G-2: The amount of stock at TMI is excessive.
III-G-2 Rect Purge TMI stock of unnecessary meterial.
III.
Admin.
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 l Reaps Program underway. Admin Division Coal for 1984.
Materials Management has issued listing of inventory i
seterial thich have had no issue activity during the l
past three years. THI-l Plant Engineering, however, l
does not have sufficient personnel resources available to perform an assessment of surplus / obsolete material.
l Maanehile, D00 has reestablished contact with B&W to 1
l act as agent for sale of surplus / obsolete 1MI-2 inique inventory items and is working with GPtEC and JCP&L to seek N.BRJ approval for sale of these items with a target approval date of 4Q/84.
l Findina III-I A review of the number of people assigned to administration work at THI-l appears excessive.
III-I Rect Look to reduce on-site clerical / admin. support.
II.
8 let Q 1985 l
Resp Operations Analysis is systematically studying all Admin.
clerical / administrative support positions on a Complete for THI-l Division division-by-division basis. A review of THI-l non-exempt, non-bargaining secretarial positions was complet6d in 1983 A review of Nuclear Ast arance clerical steport positions at IMI is in progress and l
studies are planned for TMI based Red Con and TMI l
Information Center administrative support positions I
later this year.
l )
7/20/84 BETA FIPOING/
STATUS RECDeOO.
PARAPHRASED RECOMKtOATION & SLM4ARY RESPONSE Cg.
DIVISION CIDE CGGENTS Findina IV-D-2: The sanctity of coffee breaks at Oyster Creek is a sizeable contributor to poor productivity.
IV-0-2 (b)
Rect Eliminate p.m. break or allow management to IV.
H. R./
B 4th Q 1984 determine timing.
D. C.
Resp:
Management has ability to set whether break is
~
Due to outage time requirement, allowed and if so, the timing. Management rl@ts supervisory training programa identified to all managers and supervisors after have been deferred. Supervisor Company / Union negotiations by JCPAL in training training is an ongoing require-programs and GPUNC directives. There are not ment and refresher training authorized afternoon coffee breaks.
should be conducted later in 1984.
Findina IV-D-4:
Only a fraction of the preventive maintenance routines planned for accomplishment are completed.
IV-D-4 (c)
Rec Consider reducing Preventive Maintenance Maneger's II.
O. C.
D Review for status 3rd Q 1984 staff een program stabilizes.
Resp:
Will address in '85 budget based on first half
'84 experience.
Plant Materiel established in 10/82. Their cnarter is to identify preventive maintenance requirements.
M&C, with the acquisition of the maintenance work force, is responsible for accomplishment of identified preventive maintenance. During the 1983 negotiations, the rotating shift concept for the maintenance group was established. Phase I of the implementation pro-gram for the rotating shift commences on 5/1/84.
Rotating shift concept will provide for maintenance persomel to be available 7 days per week, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, permitting full-time coverage enhancing the availability and timeliness of keeping preventive maintenance procedures and requirements. In addition, l
the PM program has been reviewed by a G)RB subcommittee
-l during the 2nd quarter.
l Findina IV-D-5:
Mobile maintenance is a costly way to perform plant maintenance.
IV-D-5 (aab) Rect Consider negotiating agreements with better utili-IV.
M&C B
4th Q 1984 zation of Mobile Maintenance. Consider making Nbile Maintenance employees do perform most of their work at Oyster Creek part of M&C Division.
Resp M&C Division is taking steps to reduce the number of Mobile Nintenance personnel located at the site. In progress throu $ attrition. Target completion for the reduction of Mobile Maintenance personnel located at Oyster Creek is still 4th Q 1984 This may slip as the outage has extended into the 3rd Q 1984.
l 3
7/20/84 BETA FIPOING/
STATUS RE EGMEM).
PARAPWASED REmMEPDATIO'* & SlM4ARY RESPONSE M.
DIVISION ODE
- 0) MEN TS Findino IV-G:
There are too many instances where rad. controls are not as good as they should be.
The work form has not accepted enough of the responsibility for hicp quality rad work performance. Excessive generation of radioactive waste is part of these problems.
IV-G (b)
Rec:
Improve Rad Con managemer# r.nd work form management I.
R&EC 8
Review for status 4th Q 1964 l working relationships.
0.C./M&C Resp:
Preparation for and initial work during outage have 4
resulted in s&stantial improvements in working rela-tionships. A Radiation bareness Committee has been formed and has held routine meetings since 5/20/83.
See responses to IV-C(a) and (c). Programs are in place to improve the working relationships; however, aJditional effort is needed. Red bareness Coassittee is fmetional but is not amieving success yet.
Management at the site level involved with hands-on personnel are required to foster and generate compliance. Will be statueed for progress 4th Q 1984.
l IV-G (f)
Recs Look to decrease number of rad. Le&s. as work II.
RAEC B
3rd Q 1984 force practices good rad. work performance.
Resp:
Will be addressed in setting '84 & '85 authorized Complete for 1984 levels.
levels of manpower. Will reduce number of Company rad. te&s as work practices improve.
Findino IV-H:
Senior management people at Oyster Creek are spending too num time on PORC matters.
IV-H Rec Review Tech. Specs to determine if present wording III.
D. C.
A*
Complete l
requires PDRC to review cbcuments beyond a scope considered appropriate. No rewrites by PORC of poorly written procedures.
Resp:
Tech Spec Change Request has been s&mitted to and issued by NRC whi& will meet this recommendation.
Eq21valmt issue under new review procedure was addressed during implementation of new adminis-trative procedures. Completed February 1984.
l Findino IV-1:
The number of people assigned to administrative work at Oyster Creek appears excessive.
IV-I Reca Rechace on-site clerical and administrative positions.
II.
0/P &
B 2nd Q 1985 l
( All divisions.) Office of the President set arbitrary Admin.
number.
Resp:
4)erations Analysis is currently studying 25 clerical l
positions in Oyster Creek Division. 0/A studies are i
planned for Oyster Creek based Nuclear Assurance and l
Rad Con administrative support staff in early 1985.
l 1 h
7/20/84 BETA FIfOlNG/
STATUS KCIBGEIO.
PARAPMIASED REOMEBOATION & Site 4ARY RESPONSE g.
DIVISION CIEE (38EN TS Findina IV-3-2: The stores and warehouse function at Dyster Creek can improv<s its sipport of the plant.
IV-J-2 (b)
%c Carefully plan disposal of on-hand direct turnover III.
Adeln./
8 Review for status 2Q 1985
-l material not required for plant sipport.
D. C.
Resp:
Material outage support to the site has been erhanced i
by both the assicpunent of a new Warehouse Manager and l
overall system improvements intro &ced by the Were-l hcuse Reassessment Program initiated in 9/83 The i
rJaber of items in the inventory has increased by over 3,000 line itene over the past year. Plant Engineering does not have sufficient persomel re-sources, however, to evaluate and verify the 8,700+
DTO itene for continued retention. Plant engineering resources will be made available to sippcet this I
requirement sich involves about two men years of l
errort are planned to begin let Q 1985.
l
_5_
)
7/20/84 SETA FIWIrdG/
STATUS ECWeEW.
PARAPleASED REEDMEWATION & SLM4ARY RESPONSE E.
DIVISION-CE)E CSOENTS Findine V-8-3 There are inefficiencies in the TMI training effort due to a lack of meaningful scheduling. The Training Department bas difficulty in etaining data to seedule its training.
V-B-3 Rect Develop realistic training schedules on an annual basis.
V.
N. A.
A*
Complete l
Resp:
The 1984 schedule for all supervisory and mer:-;----A.
development has been generated. New initial training programs in operator and other technical areas have been scheduled. Schedules are reviewed and updated, l
as appropriate, on a quarterly basis. This finding should be closed.
Findino V-8-4:
There is an overly " understanding" attitude telch prevails in the THI Training Department, especially with respect to operator training.
V-B-4 (c)
Rect M e students more responsible fcr their own performance V.
N. A./
8 3rd Q 1984 l
in traini g.
All Div.
Resp Each training site has generated documents of student
- 16C is making diligent responsibilities when in training. Ovuments are effort to enforce better being discussed for agreement with user departments at participation and dieci-GPUN. A consolidated student responsibility document pline of its employees l
is being reviewed for final approval. Finding should be during company training l
closed by September 19M with formal issuance of document.
programs.
l
- OC is woding with plant I
training eo amieve more professional student con-duct in classrooms and to better control of clase-room hours and breaks.
l
7/20/84 l
BETA FIPOINC/
STATUS RECGeEM).
PARAPFEtASED REQD#ECATION m SLMMARY RESPONSE CAT.
DIVISION CG)E 03eENTS l
Technical Functions Findings & Recommendations Findino VI-At The overall effectiveness of Technical Functions in s@ porting TNI-1 and Dyster Creek is lacking.
VI-A (b)
Rect Review methods to improve the management of the III.
T. F.
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 l large engineering group within TF.
Resp:
Activities identified in the prior response are con-tinuing, including updating of procedures reflecting experience at Dyster Creek, the evaluation of audit l
findings and continuing training of staff. At the request of the Division Director, three study groups were formed within GPUN to provide recommendations on modification control, site acmss and budget /eetimating l
systems to the Office of the President. Implementation 1
of these rer==andations wili generally assist in l
efforts to improve prodsetivity. Activities developed I
in the first and second quarter will be carried on throu@ the third and fourth quarter. The implementa-tion of three additional study groups on CPt!N practices suggested by the Tednical Ftmetions Division Director should be implemented in the third quarter by the i
Office of the President. Will be reviewed for pro-gross in 4th Q 1984.
VI-A (c)
Rect Evaltate and procure outside assistance to train IF III.
T. F.
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 l Management in swervising a large engineering group.
Resp A program has been implemented in cooperation with the Training Department and A. Miller Associates to provide a structured interaction within the Division senior management. Interviews have been conducted by A. Miller Associates with senior management and are planned for l
i various other levels within the Division. Initial dis-l t
cussions have been held on the results of the management I
interviews and preliminary action plans developed. The l
l prograi will be finally structured after interviews with I
}
other Davision personnel. Completion of the management l
1 activities will require cooperation with the MaC and two l
l Plant Divisions since much of the permived difficulties i
are interdivisional. Will be reviewed for progrees in 4th Q 1984 7-
7/20/84 BETA FlWING/
STATUS RECGeEND.
PARAPlftASED RECOMEWATION & StMMARY RCPONSE E.
DIVISION ODE CS#EN TS Findina VI4 -3: Project engineers do not receive adequate information concerning the progrees, cost and trende in progress and coat for the budget activities for sich they were the originating source of authority for the modification or the major GEM project.
VI4-3 Rect Devise reports that will permit having a rmning III.
Admin./
8 Review for status 4th Q 1984 l knowledge of cost and performance.
0/P Resp:
The Business Systems Planning (BSP) study, and two l
other committees (bdgeting, Estimating, and Cost l
Control Committeeg and Plant Modification Study Team) l have reviewed all systems, practices, etc., and will I
make recommendations to provide information which l
correlates work progrees to utilization of resources.
l The next issue of this status report will set forth l
those specific plans.
l )
7/20/84 BETA fDOING/
STATUS RECGetEND.
PARAPMtASED RE(DMEPOATION & SLM4ARY RESPONSE W.
DIVISION CIDE meeENTS Findino VII-D:
The cost redJetions possible with more sophisticated contracting methods are not being achieved.
VII-0 (a)
Rect Continue training requistioners of materials and V.
Admin.
B 3rd Q 1784 (M&C, REC)
)
services and develop a means to measure success 4th Q 1984 (NA, OC, THI-1)
I of training.
Resp Requisitioner Training Cairse being revised to tailor to specific GPUN Div needs presented in a " seminar" type 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> approach; will better insure avail. of key requisition activity managers and permit discus-sion of practical problems, causes and solutions vs.
hicply theoretical nature of initial training course.
DEC and Red Con Seminar scheduled for 3rd Q 1984; N. A.,
l 0.C. and IMI-l s&edaled for 4th Q 1984. Increased l
use of firm fixed price and award fee type contracts I
has taken place over the past year and one half. The l
use of fixed prica contracts, however, is limited to contractor efforta $1& are clearly defined in scope and dare the cost can be estimated by O'U Nuclear with some degree of certainty. Added improvements depend upon 1) early identification of technical requirements so that competition (temnical and/or i
price) can be used to the maximum; 2) improved and l
fire desicp specifications so that incentives can I
be structured to precise program milestones; and 3) l erhanced in-house estimating capability which will i
provide realistic incentives to be structured for l
cost reimbursement type contracts. The interface l
between Technical functions and Materials Management l
has sicpificantly improved, and earlier coordination I
of future requirements has taken place.
l
?
7/20/84 BETA FDDING/
STATUS RE CIDGEM).
PARAPMtASED RE0]MIEM)ATION & SIM4ARY RESPONSF M.
DIVISION CIDE CID#EN TS Finding VII-E-4: The TMI-2 entrance to the protected area uses a temporary building and manual search to control entry of personnel.
This facility and its operation are inefficient in the use of guard manpower.
VII-E-4 Rect L5 grade THI-2 Processing Cariter including installation II.
Admin.
B 3rd Q 1984 l
of metal monitors and explosive monitors. Offset is re&ction in guards at THI-2.
Resp:
Key carded turnstiles will be installed at the Unit 2 l
Processing Center not later than September 15, 1984.
l The delay thus far in accomplishing this project has l
been occasioned by the extremely hi@ workload asso-l ciated with the reactor head removal. The turnet$le l
project has now been reprioritized to assure its com-l pletion by the 3rd Quarter of 1984. This will result in a re&ction of four sen years for the thit 2 Site Protection Officer force. The construction of a per manent thit 2 Procoesing Center to include electronic I
search equipment was rejected for the 1984 budget due i
to the impending overall status diange for 1MI-2 that will occur dien the core is romved from the reactor.
Findino VII-E-5: The protected aree perimeter alarm system at hI has an excessive number of alarms.
VII-E-5 Rect 15 grade perimeter alarm system to produce a III.
Admin.
B 4th Q 1984 (TMI) l system with a minimum nymber of false alarms.
3rd Q 1985 (OC) l Resp:
Per ject is underway at ml and 0.C., coordinated by l
Tedvilcal Functions. This is a long term project with l
estimated completion 4Q '84 (TMI) and 3rd Q 1985 (DC).
l Improvement is now a NRC commitment for Oyster Creek.
Findino VII-ft GPUN has no employee who is a medical doctor at headquarters or TMI-l or Oyster Creek to oversee medical aspects of the CPlN red. health program. Part time contract stiysicians and a contractor are used for these functions.
VII-f Ree:
Employ a physician at TMI and assign medical radio-II.
RAEC B
4th Q 1984 l
logical health responsibilities for IMI-1. THI-2, and Dyster Creek.
Resp:
Board of Directors has agreed. Physician was re-l cruited and hired 5/14/84. Poultion vacated 6/13/84.
l Replacement actively sou@t.
l )
7/20/96 BETA Flf01NC/
STATUS IECseEle.
PARAPMtASED REQMIEPOAT10N & SLMNARY RESPONSE M.
DIVIS10N CIDE CseENTS Findina VIII-3: Prossetivity at the nuclear plant sites le a&ereely affected by current t:stgoining unit employees.
VIII-3 Ree:
Candact review of bargaining areements to deter-IV.
H. R.
B Complete (DC) mine impact on work efficiency.
let Q 1985 (TMI) l Resp Completed for Dyster Creek 40'83. Major espiasis has been on enforcing management ri$its in current agreement. Remains open for WI and will be addressed prior to the May 1985 negotiations.
- 7/20/84 BETA FI21NG/
STATUS RECEBGEND.
PARAPMIASED REOMEf0ATION & StMMARY RESPONSE E.
DIVISION CEDE CmeENTS Findina XII-As Insufficient or poor supervision is contributing to poor productivity.
XII-A (a)
Rect Properly train supervisory personnel.
V.
N. A.
8 3rd Q 1985 Resp:
Responses to other raca==andations address this Gen./DP problem directly. Revised Supervisory Develop-ment Program now complete and being delivered at NI and Oyster Creek. Initial efforts at Parsippany have becpn. This item reneins open with 80% completion of the Supervisory Develop-ment Program expected during the 3rd Q 1985.
XII-A (c)
Ase Menegers should develop their supervisors by V.
N. A./
8 3rd Q 1985 seerving them and instructing them.
Gen.
Resp This issue is being addressed in conjunction with the response to Rem==andation XII-A-f.
Has been addressed with all Managers on many occaelons.
New Supervisory Development Program includes manage-ment overview and involvement in the development of their s4 ordinate supervisors. This training will be ongoing and will also be an integral part of the GPUN Management Development process. This item re-moins open with 80% completion of the Supervisory Development Program expected during the 3rd Q 1985.
XII-A (j)
Rect Trending of data to ascertain problem areas.
III.
Admin./
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 l Resp:
The Activity Indicator Display program has been Gen./DP implemented to trend for potential problem areas.
A major effort by the Operations Analysis staff is l
underway to ertiance the indices currently reported l
and to encourage the use of trending within the i
divisions. Some divisions have already instituted trending programs for key operating parameters.
1MI-1, for example, trends budget, job tickets, chemistry analysis, and radiological parameters.
Rad Con trends man rens, and radiological incident reports. M&C has a trending program to identify l
problem areas in its operation.
l
- 7/20/84 BETA FIPOING/
STATUS RECGeEND.
PARAPWASED RE(DMEf0ATION & OIA04ARY RESPONSE CAT.
DIVISION (EDE ONENTS XII-A (1)
Rec:
Color-co& hard hats at the site to distinguish IV.
THI-1/
D Review for state 4th Q 1984 I workers, foremen, officers, contractors.
Gen./D.C.
Resp:
Color coding of hard hats has been revised at Dyster Creek. NI-l and 0.C. Division Directors will review this item and coordinate on desirable further revisions. At MI-1, exempt and non-exempt wear different color hard hats. No currmt plans to change system to include all categories of people listed. M&C s@ ports; consideration must be given to contractor identification requirements.
Finding XII-B:
There is too much paper being generated and distributed throu@aut the (PUN organization.
XII-8 (a)
Rect Each division director should help ensure distri-III.
Admin.
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 l bution is necessary.
Gen./DP Resp A specific effort has been initiated at the officer level to identify and use case studies to exemplify l
l inappropriate distribution of documents. Corpora te l
Goal 8 also addresses this issue. Operations Analy-sis has completed paperwork reduction studies in four l
i divisions helping them achieve an average of 23.6 l
percent paperflow rechaction. Operations Analysis l
plans similar studies in the remaining divisions.
At least one year is needed to measure the effective-l l
ness of these efforts. In addition, Administrative Division has established a forms Management Control l
group to help manage corporate paper generation and distribu tion. Will be reviewed for status at the end of 1984 XII-a (b)
Rec:
Ti@ ten signature authority; monitor for compliance.
III.
Admin.
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 l Resp:
Operations Analysis has been tasked to conduct a Gen./DP Complete for TMI-l l
review of the approval and signature requirements Communication with other I
on all documents supportive of CPUNC approval re-divisions is parallel or l
quirements. The next issue of this status report downward.
l will comment on the progress of that review.
Addressed in M&C procedJres l and monitored in an ongoing review process. ?
7/20/84 SETA FIleING/
STATUS KCIBGEIS.
PARAPt5tASED KCONEfeATION & St9 MARY HESPONSE M.
DIVISION CG)E CtBGENTS XII-8 (e)
Rect Limit required concurrences on documents / procedures.
III.
Admin.
B Review for status 4th Q 1984 i Resp Concurrence distribution is being considered as part minimize sipintures on 1
of the corporate paperierk reduction effort. Formal documents.
I procedure systems have been streamlined to implement I
limits on required concurrences. Administration Division has drafted new procedures for obtaining and documenting formel concurrences. Office of the President action on this issue will continue.
Findina XII-D:
There appears to be a reluctance within the GPUN system to take action eith- ? to leprove the performance of poor performers or to terminste their employment.
XII-0 (a)
Rect Review for practical usefulness, GPUNC procedure IV.
H. R./
A*
Complete l
addressing poor performers.
General Resp:
Progressive discipline procedure developed and in use.
l H. R. has worked with eedi Division and reviewed all i
Performance Wraisals of 2.0 or below. Plans for l
improvement have been developed and follow-up proce-l dures are in effect.
l Findina XII-Et Since the creation of GPUN, too many small groupe (cells or staffs) have been formed to carry out functions thich should be handled within the normal functioning groups.
XII-E Rec:
Each director review manpower staffing to reduce II.
0/P &
B 2nd Q 1985 l
unnecessary small staff build-ups.
Admin.
Resp:
Staffing of all Divisions is reviewed as part of l
budget process. Staff reduction goals of I-2 per-l cent were established in 1984. Further reductions l
are planned for 1985. Operations Analysis condsets 4 - 5 stafring studies annually. In addition, Operations Analysis plans to specifically study cell groupe throu@out GPUN in 1985. )