ML20094D500

Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue on Contentions 1-10 Re Legal Authority.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20094D500
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	08/03/1984
From:	LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20094D491	List: ML20094D488 ML20094D500
References
OL-3, NUDOCS 8408080423
Download: ML20094D500 (14)

Text

--

i

%s -  :*: l

_w -

Appendix B: Statement of Material i Facts as to Which There Is No Dispute

1. If Shoreham were to be operated and an emergency occurred, the State.and the County would respond to the emer-gency. Cordaro and Weismantle (State Emergency Plan), ff. Tr.

y:@=::;r- .-,J13, SCD ,- :st : 7.

2. Under the LILCO Plan, State and County personnal

-could communicate with LILCO and LERO using existing systems

~

already installed. LILCO Transition Plan, Figure 4.1.3 and pages 4.1-1, 4.1-4; Cordaro and Weismantle (State Emergency Plan), ff. Tr. 13,899, at 8; Tr. 13,737-41 (Daverio) (if the State has unplugged RECS telephone, it need only plug it in to communicate in an emergency).

3. Space' exists in the Emergency Operations Facility, the~ Emergency Operation Center, and the Emergency News Center

-for use by State and County officials. LILCO Transition Plan 3.8-5, 3.8-6.

4. The Director of Local Response is to take into ac-count in making any protective action recommendations advice that may be received from local and state government officials.

-LILCO Transition Plan, 3.1-1 and OPIP 2.1.1, p. 5 of 79.

5. Traffic guides are trained to assist police should they participate in an emergency. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.6.3, p. 11 of 46; Babb et al. (Training), ff. Tr. 11,140, at Vol. 5, Attachment 20, Module 12.

p-f 8409000423 840803 i' PDR ADOCK 05000322

!. G PDR

e-1.:

+

~

6. If the State of New York and the County of Suffolk

, participate in an emergency response,-the LERO organization

-will? coordinate its activities with State and County officials.

2 See LILCO Transition Plan 1.4-1.

7. LILCO could implement an " uncontrolled" evacuation,

1. ';= % ,,;.cucing nc traffic guides, signs, cones, or c.lianneliz.ai.ivu, wil.h an increase of evacuation times of less than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 35 minutes in normal-conditions and 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 55 minutes in inclement weath-

?*

<e r . Cordaro et al. (Contention 65), ff. Tr. 2,337, at 15.

8.- LILCO's evacuation time estimates, including the

" uncontrolled"_ evacuation time estimates, are comparable to es-timates for other nuclear power plants. Cordaro et al. (Con-

. tention 65),: ff. Tr. 2,337, at 46-47.

9. An " uncontrolled" evacuation would result in an ad-iequate response under the LILCO Plan. Cordaro et al. (Conten-

, . tion 65), ff. Tr. 2,337, at 71-72; Cordaro et al. (Contention f'

. .23.C, 1%.and H), ff. Tr. 2,337, at 17-18.

10. LILCO employees will not be " directing traffic," if L .by that phrase one means' compelling people to move in a partic-

ular direction. Cordaro et al. (Contention 65), ff. Tr. 2,337, c

at.60-61; Cordaro et al. (Contention 23.H), ff. Tr. 2,337, at

.e :-

21-22.

I

f 'n a w,a -

s>-

{

7

.3 -

M 11. Traffic guides will be stationed at key intersec-tions-to faciliate the movement of traffic by using hand and

' arm signals.and:thus discourage travel in certain directions, but traffic will not be restricted from traveling in a particu-lar direction. Tr. 2,344 (Lieberman).

fs 4;;t#c7.pc. p.- 12. LILCO will not force anyone to turn in a particular direction should they choose not to do so. LILCO Transition Plan,fAppendix A, IV-8; Cordaro et al. (Contention 65), ff. Tr.

2,337,. at 76;.Cordaro et al. (Contention 23.H), ff. Tr. 2,337, 1

at 21-22; Tr. 2,625 (Lieberman).

13. Only one two-way road is converted to a one-way

~

.roadEunder the LILCO Plan. LILCO Transition Plan, Appendix A, Table ~XIII.

14. LILCO Traffic guides will use cones, hand signals, add. arm movements to encourage the movement of traffic out of

~'the EPZ as quickly as possible. Cordaro et al. (Contention 65), ff. Tr. 2,337, at 61-62.

15. The controlled evacuation contemplated under the

'LILCO Plan results in a traffic time estimate of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> and 55 minutes.for evacuation of the entire 10-mile EPZ in summer in good weather, and 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> in inclement winter weather. Cordaro et^al.-(Contention 65), ff. Tr. 2,337, at 62, and Attachment 6 (Cases 12 and 19, respectively).

^ ' '-~

er- ,

.3 . ,

13 x -

g-

' 16.;The.LILCO Transition Plan provides for the incorpo-g ration [by.the traffic. guides trained under that plan of any po-lice: assistance'that is offered during an emergency. LILCO Transition Plan,~OPIP'3.6.3, p. 11 of 46.

~

17.: Traffic-guides are trained to explain to the police glfM:4WTQp;isituation existing at the time of an emergency, to turn over posts'for facilitating traffic to the police, and to re-

main as assistants if necessary in coordinating the evacuation

effort. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.6.3, p. 11 of 46; Babb et al.L(Training), ff. Tr. 11,140, at-Vol. 5, Attachment 20, o s

~

.c ModuleL12.

p -

y

18. The controlled evacuation plan used in the present

~

! ~h - i trafficiplan?for Shoreham could be modified-to eliminate traf-

[,

- ific' guides. entirely, with a resulting increase in evacuation 7,  : time estimates of 1-1/2 hours.

- Tr. 2,663 -(Lieberman); Cordaro 4 et al.-(Contention 65),1 ff. Tr. 2,337,-at Attachment 6 (Case E ~ 24) .-

t

19. Even what is referred to in the record as the ,

u, ,

2" uncontrolled" evacuation' time estimate is reasonable,when com-Lpared toftimeiestimates at other nuclear power plant sites, and imeet's'the accuracy' standards of NUREG-0654. Cordaro et al.

- i (' Contention 65),1ff. Tr. 2,337,- at 46-47.

4 -

t W

A s

J. '--

g:a b

g

'20. Whether a " controlled" or an " uncontrolled" evacua-

[ -tion time estimate is used as the basis for protective action recommendations, the choice between evamration and sheltering

-will'be' based upon the action that affords the greatest does savings. Cordaro et al. (Protective Actions), ff. Tr. 8760, at pSEJ;.; E ;2 7 ~, : .-

21. LILCO's traffic plan relies upon " trail blazer"

~ signs'to mark routes out of the EPZ. Cordaro et al., ff. Tr.

. 2,337, at 61; Clawson et al. (Public Information), ff. Tr.

' 10,035, at 12-13.

22. These signs are located along every major road in

~

the EPZ. Id.

23. The trail blazer signs will contain the standard evacuation route logo used for civil defense purposes throughout the country. Tr. 2,539 (Lieberman); Tr. 2,614-19 (Weismantle, Lieberman).

24. The-evacuation time estimates for an uncontrolled

, evacuation would not be altered were a scheme to be developed that'did not include traffic signs. ,

Cordaro et al. (Contention 65), ff. Tr.<2,337, at 68-69 and Attachment 6 (compare Case 24 (uncontrolled case assuming route compliance) with Case 34 (uncontrolled case assuming 50% non-compliance with route as-signments)).

E iC

x.

YU _- ,

[e &

--e -

25. The LILCO Plan provides for road crews, made up of m e -

'LERO_ workers to remove stalled cars and other obstacles from roadwaysfuAing_LILCO tow trucks and line trucks. LILCO Transi-

. tion Plan, OPIP 3.'6.3, p. 12; Cordaro et al. (Contention 66),

..ff.. Tr. 6,685, at 6-7.

tte;;41WiMWi ~ J 26. ~ Under iche LILCO. Transition Plan, the Director of

' Local desponse implements procedures to set'off sirens at a

_ Site Area or General emergency. LILCO Transition Plan, 3.3-4.

. 27. The sirens are activated using the encoder at the p . .

~EOC. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.3.4, p. 2 cf 7.

2'8. In the event that the' local EOC is not activated and i the initial' notification from Shoreham is of a General

' ' 1 1 emergency with. protective action recommendations, the Customer

- r,w

> Service Supervisor, at'the direction ~of'the Director of Local

,. 1 Response, instructs'the Shoreham. Emergency-Director to activate

o

"' ~

ithe siren system-from the Shoreham control room. LILCO Transi-a I'idn; Plan 3.3-5 and OPIPJ3.3.4, p. 7.

t n

>, ;29.'A backup encoder is located at the Brookhaven

~

JSubstation. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.3.4,'pp. 2-3 of 7.

30. In the-. event that the Customer Service Operntor.is

?? ,

lunablefto; reach?the Director of. Local Response within 10 cminutestof receipt ofcnotification from Shoreham of a. General

' emergency with a recommendation for' protective action, the cus-

~

.tomer; service supervisor. notifies the Shoreham Emergercy a

z .

J J

4

w '$

-o' .

c L

> '

fC h

_ -7 Director aud: requests that the control room activate the si-O

• s 'rens. -LILCO Transition Flan OPIP, 3.3.4, p. 3 of 7.

31. The prompt notification system for the LILCO Plan fis mide 12p oof -a system of fixed sirens, mounted throughout the J10-mile'.EPZ, as well as an emergency broadcast system and tone gn:gM d:5 alert radios. LiLev Transition rian 3.3-4 and UPIP 3.3.4.

32.'Under the LILCO Transition Plan, the Director of

-Local Response is responsible for decision-making for responses to be taken pursuant to the plan. LILCO Transition Plan, 3.3-1.

33. The LILCO Transition Plan provides for the incorpo-iration of the County Executive or his designated representative in responding to'an emergency should that official choose to participate. LILCO Transition Plan, 3.1-1.

34. Drafts of EBS messages to be used during an emer-gency are included in the plan. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP

1. 3.8.2,. Attachment 4.

m

35. The LILCO Transition Plan provides that LILCO em-is ~ ployees will make protective action recommendations for the 50-45 mile ingestion exposure pathway EPZ. LILCO Transition Plan 19 .

3.6-8 and OPIP 3.6.6, Section 5.4.

36. The Radiation Health Coordinator is responsible for

+ . communicating recommended protective actions to farms, food processors, and other food chain establishments. LILCO

-/

Transition Plan, 3.6-8.

,,,--,--,--wm,-,4,-,-,--,w.--v,,-,,

r; -

o-1 l

l l

k; 37.-The Coordinator of Public Information is responsi-L

,ble for communicating the same information to the general pub-lic. Id. .

-38,. Recommendations would include suggestions about the sheltering of dairy animals, limiting or ceasing the consump-pp=.J- ~ n .tiori of ^certain foodstuffs, washing or scrubbing fruit anc veg-

~

etables, or.other similar precautions. See Cordaro et al.

s - ~(Contention 81), ff. Tr. 13,563.

i: 39.: Recommendations would identify areas of concern and offsr to compensate anyone with economic losses due to food v ..

being withheld from the market. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP

. ' 3 . 6. 6, Section 5.4.3.1; Tr. 13,769-92 (Cordaro, Daverio, s.

' Watts).

40. The Plan provides that short-term and long-term re-covery and reentry operations will be performed by LILCO em-o -ployees. See LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.10.1.

b 41. The recovery action committee (1) coordinates area radiological surveys, (2) evaluates data, (3) identifies areas to_be reentered,-(4) mobilizes required resources, manpower, and equipment for reentry, (5) determines that all utilities

, #are functioning, that food supplies are adequate, and that

evacuation effects on public health are mitigated, s '(6) participates with LILCO in-preparing and issuing announce-

' ~

ments, specifying the areas that may be reentered, and r

e . . , . - , , , - . - - . . - . . - , , , . - , . . , , ,..s. -,,. , , , . , . ,,-a. .- ,

.y n_

^

t:

.- ;\

~

Z (7)' ensures establishment of an organization to estimate popu-

~

Llation exposure'on a continuous basis. LILCO Transition Plan, r

3.10'-11and.3.10-2. ,

42.'Two states are involved in the 50-mile ingestion Lexposure pathway EPZ for Shoreham: New York State and Con-MMOMW44!Nnecti~cuti. See,-- e.g., Cordaro et~ al. (Contention 81), ff. Tr.

u

~13,563,u at 7-8.

43. Connecticut has agreed to implement protective ac-tion re' commendations in its State when. notified by-LILCO of an emergency atEShoreham. Cordaro and Renz (Letter of Connecticut Supplement), ff.~ Tr. 13,858, at Attachment 2.

44. Protective action recommendations for the 50-mile

' ingestion exposure pathway need not be made immediately follow-

-m .

ting ~theideclaration of an emergency. LILCO Transition Plan, OPIPl3.6.6, p. 1 of 50.

45. Following.an-emergency at a nuclear power plant,

~

many governmental entities step forward to study the situation and to' determine what actions should be taken to reenter the area affected.and recover it if necessary. Tr. 10,509-10 l(Weismantle); Cordaro et al. (Contention 81), ff. Tr. 13,563,

+

at 38-39; Tr. 13,702-06 (Daverio, Watts).

46. LILCO plans to station fuel truck in proximity to evacuation routes to assist motorists who may run out of fuel.

-Cordaro et al. (Contention 66), ff. Tr. 6,685, at 14.

L

1 i .

47. LILCO plans to provide sufficient fuel such that 5' ,

k gallonsuof fuel per vehicle.will be available. Id. at 15.

48.? Dispensing fuel from tank trucks is not required LunderLthe NRC' emergency planning regulations, or even suggested

~ by NUREG-0654. Tr. 12,818 (Keller).

w :ter;lg . . 49,.The Evu is located on L1 Leo property. LILCO Tran-sition. Plan, 4.1-1.

50. LILCO~ employees =are assigned to the EOC to identify

. persons entering the facility. LILCO Transition Plan OPIP il ;4.1.1,.ph 2 of 12.

Mf 51. LILCO employees will be assigned to the EPZ perime-Ster to discourage people from entering the EPZ through the use Jof hand and arm movements and traffic cones. Weismantle and

'4' Lieberman-(Traffic), ff. Tr. 2337, at 62.

52. All relocation centers used for the LILCO Plan will be in Nassau County. LILCO's testimony on Phase II Emergency Planning. Contentions 24.0, 74, and 75 (Relocation Centers), at 22.

.53. LILCO relies ~upon the Red Cross to provide reloca-f ;j; tionLcenters. Id. at 15.

g 4; S4. LERO-workers will rely upon the local police to i -provide ~ security at. relocation centers to the extent it is nec-g'essary. Tr. 11,344 (Varley).

.lc_

Y I

c . . .__ . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ -

e. - - -

n,

--405

._yy, Ia p

55.-No LERO personnel would be relied upon to maintain F _ - .

? order at G relocation centers. Tr. 11,344-(Varley); Tr. 12,069

~

k . ( Mi,le ti ) .

~

56. LILCO personnel are assigned to relocation centers to liaison with Red Cross, provide monitoring and f%rfper.t c . decontaminatilong and help in the parking lots of the facilities to.ch'annel people through the monitoring and decontamination W .-

tf'"- process and to there relocation center. LILCO Transition Plan n;p, ,b ,3.6-7 and OPIP 4.2.1, pp. 1-7'of 22; LILCO Testimony at 24.

'3f-

57. LERO workers will not be ordering, requiring, or

- using ' force tx) " maintain security." Cordaro et al. (Credibili-

. ty), ff. Tr. 10,396, at 101-04; Tr. 11,344 (Varley); Tr.

12,068-69 (Mileti).

as 58. LERO employees will be checking identification of

-persons at the EOC. Cordaro et al. (Credibility), ff. Tr.

10,396, at 101-04.

L' S9. LERO employees will be channeling traffic and the stream of people who may be arriving at .elocation centers for Jassistance. Id.

60. If difficulties ensue at the EOC, the perimeter, or relocation centers, LERO workers will call the police. Tr.

11,344 (Varley).

T 1

g. ,

7 .

i.M j

- - 4 J LILCO, August 6, 1984 L9:7

p -

i e

CERTIFICATE OF' SERVICE

'O ' '

In the Matter of

. LONG ISLAND' LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)

Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 Okhh % :2;'& ' - -

~

1 I hereby' certify that copies of LILCO'S MOTION FOR SUM-

.,.. -MARY DISPOSITION OF. CONTENTIONS-1-10 (THE " LEGAL AUTHORITY" IS-

~

' SUES)'-were served this date upon the following by first-class

' mail,: postage. prepaid or, as. indicated by an asterisk, by Fed-1 erat 11 Express .

0D .. ,(James [A.[Laurenson,*

.. Secretary of the Commission 0 .' fChairman: 'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

, w Atomic 7 Safety ~and Licensing Commission.

Board Washington, D.C. 20555

~ LU.S.1 Nuclear' Regulatory Commission. Atomic Safety and Licensing East-West Tower,=nm. 402A ' Appeal Board Panel

?4350 East-West' Hwy. .U.S.. Nuclear Regulatory r

.Bethesda/ MD. 20814 ' Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

'Dr.LJerry'R. Kline*

Atomic : Safety 'and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board' Board Panel

g ;U.S.; Nuclear Regulatory. U.S. . Nuclear Regulatory

^

. Commission- Commission East-West Tower, Rm. 427 Washington, D.C. 20555 b 4350iEast-West Hwy.

Bethesda,..MD 20814 ' Bernard M. Bordenick, Esq.*

David.A. Repka, Esq.

Mr.rFrederick J. Shon* .Edwin J. Reis, Esq.

-lAto:nic : Safety and Licensing _ U. S. Nuclear Regulatory

Board Commission-s yU.S.sNuclear' Regulatory .7735 Old Georgetown Road

-Commission- (to mailroom)

, v ~ -: East-West Tower,-Rm.-430 'Bethesda,.MD 20814

~-4350 L East-West . Hwy.

L :Bethesda,-MD. 20814 r

h$

l

n LO; 2-

. Eleanor L. Frucci,<Esq.* Stewart M. Glass, Esq.*

< LAttorney. Regional Counsel AtomiccSafetyLand Licensing Federal Emergency Management Board-Panel' . Agency.

U..S. Nuclear. Regulatory. 26 Federal Plaza, Room 1349 Commission , New York, New York 10278 East-West' Tower, North Tower 4350 East-West Highway- Stephen B. Latham, Esq.*

Bethesda, MD 20814 Twomey, Latham & Shea 33 West Second Street

.m. . m Fabian G. Palomino. Esa.* P.O. Box 398

' ~ " ' " ?Special" Counsel'to the' P.iverhead, New York 11901 Governor Executive Chamber Ralph Shapiro, Esq.*

Room 229 Cammer & Shapiro, P.C.

State Capitol -9 East 40th Street LAlbany, New York 12224 .New York, New York 10016 Herbert H. Brown,' Esq.* James Dougherty, Esq.

Lawrence.Coe Lanpher, Esq. 3045 Porter Street Christopher McMurray, Esq. Washington, D.C. 20008 lKirkpatrick,'Lockhart, Hill Christopher & Phillips Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq.

8th Floor. New Y.ork State Department of 1900 M Street, N.W. Public Service, Staff Counsel

Washington, D.C. 20036 Three Rockefeller Plaza Albany, New York 12223 MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue Spence W. Perry, Esq.

' Suite-K Associate General Counsel San: Jose, California 95125 Federal Emergency Management

~

Agency

-Mr.~ Jay Dunkleberger. .

500 C .:treet, S.W.

New York State Energy Office Room 840

-Agency Building 2 Washington, D.C. 20472

' Empire State Plaza Albany, New York -12223 Ms. Nora Bredes Executive Coordinator V Shoreham Opponents' Coalition

( 195 East Main Street Smithtown, New York 11787 w

3

, , , . . . ._,,-..-.-,----,---.,.--2%-- - ,,,,.-.,-..,,,v.i,...o.--, ,v,,,,,,,-.w,.-

{

jf; 0 1" o .-

Gerald C. Crotty, Esq. Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.

Counsel to the Governor Suffolk County Attorney

.. Executive Chamber H. Lee Dennison Building L

State Capitol Veterans Memorial Highway Albany, New York 12224 Hauppauge, New York 11788 s

i , - - , . - ..

James N. Christman Hunton & Williams 707' East Main ~ Street P.O. Box 1535

-Richmond, Virginia 23212

. DATED: August 6, 1984-a