ML20094C529

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Remis 840730 Request for 60-day Extension of Deadline for Comments on Des.S Remis Has Not Shown Basis or Identified Particular Matter of Concern to Warrant Extension
ML20094C529
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/1984
From: Conner T
CONNER & WETTERHAHN
To: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8408080019
Download: ML20094C529 (1)


Text

,. -

LAW OPP! GEN GONNER & WETTERHAHN, P.G.

1747 PE N NSYLVANI A AVE N U E. N. W.

L?, ";. ',,"""";;A'"in *^"'"" " " " "

HO EN M.NADER li_' ' NgM. O LSO N

' " "" "u^i ".","En"i " "'

caoai naa-osoo

^

"b*","JO. a .. = o. August 6, 1984 CAnLE ADDRESS: Mo M I.AW Mr. Albert Schwencer Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of Public Service Electric and Gas Company (Hope Creek Generating Station)

Docket No. 50-354

Dear Mr. Schwencer:

This response to the letter dated July 31, 1984 from Miss Susan Remis on behalf of the Public Advocate of the State of New Jersey, Miss Remis has requested a 60-day extension of the deadline for providing comments on the Draft Environmental Statement for Hope Creek.

Miss Remis has not shown any basis why such an extension is " reasonable" under 10 C.F.R. S51.73. No reason is given as to why it was necessary for Mr. Potter, as opposed to some other attorney, to commence what Miss Remis describes as "the process of obtaining expert consultants to review the draft environmental statement." Moreover, Miss Remis has not identified any particular matter of concern for which an extension of the usual comment period shculd be

- granted.

Sincerely, Troy B. Conner, Jr.

Counsel for the Applicant TBC/dlf

cc
Susan Remis, Esq.

G408000019 840806 PDR ADOCK 05000354 9 PDR gp