ML20093P082
| ML20093P082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 06/29/1984 |
| From: | Kober R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20093P058 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8408030014 | |
| Download: ML20093P082 (2) | |
Text
c e
'e4 f%,
9nnpp 23
~ r hl %
Rs.brdnam lb?~"a f
/"" }
da
. d,/.""3 HOCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION e 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.146 Y001 k ROGER W. KOBER ELEC S AM PetooucTrose agta coct 7 a 5 46-2 700 June 29, 1984 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Subject:
I& E Inspection Report 84-05 Notice of Violations Inservice Inspections of Modified Components and Systems R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-244
Dear Dr. Murley:
In accordance with the above subject which stated "As a result of the inspection conducted on March 27-30, 1984, and in accordance with the revised NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C), published in the Federal Register on March 8, 1984 (49FR8583),
the following violation was identified:"
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criterion XIV requires that measures shall be established to indicate the status of inspections and tests performed upon individual items of the nuclear power plant.
Those measures shall provide for the identification of items which e
have satisfactorily passed required inspections and tests, where necessary to preclude inadvertent bypassing of such inspections and tests.
The R.
E. Ginna Nucioar oM Power Plant Quality Assurance Program requires that pma-the status change of equipment and systems be indicated g
in accordance with esta'lished rules.
It further o
en requires that procedures be established to indicato
,0 the status of inspections and tests of component and at system modifications.
Contrary to the above, on or before March 27, 1984 a
measures were not established to preclude inadvertent bypassing of inservice inspections of modified components O
and systems which are required to be includod in the
}
r-facility Inservice Inspection Program in that no protistons exist to assure added welds are incorporated into the ISI program.
Also stated in this inspection report, "The inspector was informed that a procedure addressing the above is being considered by the licensee."
the following is submitted in response.
Corrective action to address this violation is as follows:
Presently, there is no formal method available to assure that required additions are made to the Inservice Inspection Program for modified components and systems.
Rochester Gas and Electric is conducting a comprehensive reassessment of the modification process.
This was done in response to Inspection Report 83-23.
A six-part Modification Process Improvement Plan was formulated in our January 27, 1984 response.
As part of item five of this six-part plan, procedures will be developed or revised to provide a formalized method to assure that required additions are made to the Inservice Inspection Program for modified systems and components.
These procedures will be in place prior to September 30, 1984.
1 o
Truly Yo es, N
fh' Rr or W.
Kober Subscribed and sworn to me on this 29th day of une 1984.
AA.
008 LYNN l. HAUCK NOTA.:Y PUSUC, State of N Y., Monroe County My Commission bpires March 30,10 7,
8*
e