ML20093H146
| ML20093H146 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 10/11/1984 |
| From: | Blake E GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Bernabei L GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT |
| References | |
| CON-#484-466 SP, NUDOCS 8410160180 | |
| Download: ML20093H146 (2) | |
Text
AlkQ9 RELm -
y
.wgg Q
SHAw, PITTMAN, PoTTs & TROWEbRfDGE A PARTNERSMap OF PRCFESSIONAL CORPORAT.ONS b 1800 M STRecT. N. W.
WASHINGTON. D. C. 200% M 15 @ :
45 i m..'--.'O-..--. -
TL6EX bb I2 ist ;,
89-2693 etMAw(Aw w3Hg October 11, 190k M ffjG2 5$b. t'
- E**"
enNcsT L. etant. an., p.c.
iE=Y.TaSE Lynne Bernabei, Esq.
Government Accountability Project 1555 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Company (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stati n Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-289
Dear Lynne:
With reference to Mr. Lewis' letter of October 4, 1984 and y'ours of October 8, 1984, I understand your representation to be that TMIA has identified in response to Licensee's requests every document in its possession or control which TMIA regards as relevant to the Dieckamp Mailgram issue, and that these doc-uments consist of the following:
(1)
Documents listed by Licensee in Interrogatory No. 20 of its Third Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to TMIA, dated September 13, 1984; (2)
Documents listed in TMIA's Supplemental Response to Licensee's Second Set of Interrogatories and Second Request for Production, Interrogatory No.
2, dated September 18, 1984; (3)
Memorandum from David Gamble to Norman Mosely, dated January 26, 1981; (4)
Kemeny Commission interviews that Licensee has provided TMIA.
(5)
Documents produced by the NRC Staff in response to TMIA's First Request for Production to the NRC Staff, dated August 3, 1984.
4 8410160180 841011 PDR ADOCK 05000289 gh Q
PDR n
h j
SHAw, PITTMAN. PoTTa & TROWIRIDGE j
ruca w.p o, oesseiomat eo.o.arious Letter to Lynne Bernabei, Esq.
Octcber 11, 1984 Page 2 On the basis of this representation, Licensee will not file a motion to compel.
Please advise me promptly if my un-derstanding is incorrect.
Sincerely, (SZk*U Ernest L.
Blake, Jr.
P.C.
Counsel for Licensee cc: Service List G