ML20093D214

Spec of Particular Matters for Consideration in Phase II Hearings.Aslb Response to Listed Issues Requested. Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20093D214
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	10/01/1984
From:	Sinkin L Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, INC., SINKIN, L.A.
To:
References
CON-#484-383 OL, NUDOCS 8410110151
Download: ML20093D214 (5)

Text

.

jf 00CMETED

':9190

~ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g gg _g gj 52

~BEFORE THE ATOMIC. SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD'

-In the Matterlof

(

OFFICE 7 SLt.: :.

00CKEitkG & 5EF&

y

-HOUSTON LIGHTING ~AND

(

Docket Nos. 50-498 OL

-POWER' COMPANY, ET AL.

)

50-499 OL

-(South _ Texas Project,

(

Units 1 and-2)

(.

CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER (CCANP)

SPECIFICATION OF PARTICULAR MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION IN_EBBSE_11_dE8BINGS On May. 22,

1984, the ASLB in this proceeding issued

-a Memorandum and Order calling upon the parties to identify the

, list,of particular matters suggested for consideration in Phase II hearings in this proceeding.

i The ASLB to ~date has reviewed numerous motions for new

. contentions and issued various orders relating to such motions.

CCANP seeks 'further clarification from the ASLB on the ASLB's viewLof-the-issues which it will permit to be considered in Phase p.

II hearings.

. Consequently, CCANP herein submits a comprehensive list ~ of 'the issues it believes the Phase II hearings should i

L-encompass and awaits the ASLB's response to such a list.

Quadrex Issues i

LI. Pre-Ouadrex B&R Design and Engineering Process l

.A.

Audits L

1.

B&R 2.

HL&P

~~

'3.

Trends 4.

Failure to take timely corrective action B.

Reports to NRC' 1.

50.55(e) 2.

Other (e.g. Part 21)

C.'Other studies of design and engineering (third party)

.D.

Guidance to HL&P and~B&R DA personnel l'

8410110151 841001 PDR-ADOCK 05000498 l-O PDR

.g

-4.

II. Commissioning'of Quadrex A.

Quadrex/HL&P relationship established B.

Direction ^

~

1..HL&P. defining study

a. Known problems of industry b.

Known problems of B&R C.JPurpose 1.

HL&P view

.2.

Quadrex view D.'Quadrex qualifications 1.

Previous studies 2.

Staff experience III. Conduct'of Study A.

Methodol ogy 1.tLocation a.

On site b..Home Office 2.. Sampling technique a.

Who devised b.

How implemented 3.

Extensiveness a.

Time b.

Personnel c.' Cost d.

Drawings, descriptions, etc. reviewed B. : Interaction HL&P/Quadrex 1.

Interim Meetins

'2.

Comments on Drafts 3.

Revisions during study a.

topics b.

approach / methodology c.

scope C.

Interaction HL&P/B&R 1.

Interim-meetings 2.

Comments on drafts 3.

Revisions!of study discussed D.

Interaction B&R/Quadrex 1.

Interim meetings 2.

Comments on drafts

3.

Revisions of study discussed E.

Quadrex 1.

Changes over time period of study

a. Methodology b.

Topics

<c.' Opinion or perspective d.

Scope e.

Categorization F.

Personnel (not covered by II.D.2 or III.A.3.b.)

G.

Interactions HL&P/NRC 1."Goldberg/ Sells 1

2. HL&P/ Region-IV 2

IV. Delivery of Study A.

Meetings 1.' Responses of HL&P 2.

Responses of B&R 3.

Quadrex responses to HL&P and B&R responses

.V.

Notification /Reportability A.

Obligations to Board and Staff 1.

B&R 2.

HL&P

.3.

Quadrex 4.

Policy guidance issued by a.

HL&P b.

B&R c.

NRC

-B.

50.55(e) 1.

Quadrex Reports by HL&P a.

Details, reporting process, substance b.

Safety Significance c.

Methodology for deciding notification d.

Methodology for deciding reportability VI. Substance of Guadrex A.

Specific Findings B.

Generic Findings C.

Implications for HL&P's Character and Competence VII. Post-Quadrex/ Pre NRC Review (August 1981)

A.

Changes in B&R design and engineering B.

Changes in HL&P-design and engineering C.

Changes in B&R requested by HL&P 1.

Implemented by B&R 2.

Not implemented by B&R D.

,anstruction permissions sought and received from NRC E.

Other responses VIII. NRC Review of Quadrex A.

Investigation in August 1981 B.. Region IV C.

Sells /NRR 1.

Preinvestigation (August 1981) 2.

Postinvestigation D.

Reis/Gutierre:

E.

Construction permissions sought and received from NRC IX. NRC Investigations A.

CCANP Chronology B..Dircks Chronology L

C.

82-02 D.

NUREG-0948 X.

NRC Testimony A.-Dircks to Congress B.

Any other testimony

~

5 XI. QuadrexA11 ens Creek A.. Failure to Testify B.

Board Order reopening C.

Testimony 1.

NRC

-2.

HL&P XII. Termination of B&R as A-E A.

HL&P considerations re-changing architect-engineer 1.

April meeting Corpus Christi 2.

Decision making process 3.

Reasons for removal XIII. Phase I Hearings STNP A.

Testimony 1.

Quadrex coverage

2. Engineering generally B.

Consultant List C.

Pleadings on Guadrex to date 1.

NRC 2.

HL&P Other Issues

.I.

Hurricane Contention II. Bechtel/Ebasco Performance III. Unstable Soil Conditions (pending)

IV. Reliability of NRC Investigations Respectfully submitted, Lanny Sinkin Representative for Intervenor Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, Inc.

114 W.

7th, Suite 220 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 478-7197 (512) 478-3290 October 1, 1984 4

1

1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA l

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g)gg USNnc BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD N

M '9 AH :52 i

'In the Matter of

(

j

)

GF P m.,-,..

HOUSTON LIGHTING AND

(

Docket NosDOSQdi

' CEO G.

POWER COMPANY, ET AL.

)

50SA (South Texas Project,

(

i Unitsr1 and 2)

(

CEBILElG61E DE SEBy1CE I

hereby certify that-copies of CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER, INC.

(CCANP) SPECIFICATION OF PARTICULAR MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION IN PHASE II HEARINGS were served by Express Mail

(*) or by deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage paid to the f oll owing individuals and entities on the 1st day of

~ October 1984.

Charles Bechhoefer, Esquire Brian Berwick, Esquire Chairman Asst. Atty. Gen.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board State of Texas 1U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmtl. Protection Washington, D. C.

20555 P.

O.

Box 12548, Capitol Sta.

Austin, Texas 78711 Dr. James C.

Lamb, III Administrative Judge Robert G.

Perlis, Esquire 313 Woodhaven Road Office of the Exec. Leg. Dir.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Ernest E. Hill Administrative Judge Jack R.

Newman, Esquire Hill Associates 1615 L Street, NW L

210 Montego Drive Washington, D.C.

20036 Danville, California 94526

(

Melbert Schwarz, Esquire Baker and Botts

(.

Executive Director, C.E.U.

Houston, Texas 77002 Mrs. Peggy Buchorn 300 One Shell Plaza Route 1, Box 1684 Brazoria, Texas 77422 Atomic Safety and Licensing Bd.

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

William S.

Jordan, III, Esq.

Washington, D.C.

20555' L

Harmon, Weiss & Jordan l

.2001 S Street, N.W.,

Suite 430 Atomic Saf ety and Licensing i

Washington,'D.C.

20009 Appeal Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Pat Coy-Washington, D.C.

20555 5106 Casa Dro San Antonio,' Texas 78233 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

.'L Washington, D.C.

20555 l

dt"' a A (4AA Lanny inkin

-