ML20092P572
| ML20092P572 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1984 |
| From: | Sinkin L Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, INC. |
| To: | NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| LBP-84-13, OL, NUDOCS 8407090119 | |
| Download: ML20092P572 (4) | |
Text
DQ4 Uill ! !E D SIATE U 'f1E R I CA r:UCLEAR REGULAFUHY LOdMIEHIOI:
2 I
P
. i F Oh.E. 1 HL A 1 OM i. G.
.h' W t: 1 %.
A.. N D. L.. I..CE.tt..i. i NU. Ai
't-- AL-. C,A R D. _,
s.
In the Matter at
(
)
LO SNB Sf,
[!JJ :54 l
tludiH U!4 LIGHTINb AND t
Doc!et Nee.
)
bi)-499 OL
(
(South Io, ar Prolect,
)
ric 3 ERANCH Un1to 1 and
.J )
/
CITIZENS CCNCLHJED ABOUT ' 4UC LL: it PUWER, INC. (CCAbP) j MuIIUN TO hE F Pt JNU ]N 2:!1R;l ANT Ial COMf-L I A!JCE Un March 14, l Wl, the Otoai c % f at' and Licencina Paard in thit prt:e Ming issued ' br.j r Partial ini ti al Dac; sten ( 0p a r e: t i n g Licen;u)
( F ' h iu: e 1).
L PF -t.i 1 - 13, WLbP No. 79-421-07 OL (March 14, t X 'i l.
O' March.i,
- 1984, C ; t i r e n r. Concerned nbout Nuclear Power,
~
[nc.
(CCANF) fi1ed iu notice of intent to appeal from that Itic 1 c i tan.
On M:-ch "7,
- 1984, CC :N'r' filed its motion r eq Lecc t i n g an a:id t t t on al ninety (90) dayu to prepare :. t c appeal On April 17, 1 W:4, the A t o..ii c Safuty and Licensing Ar3 cal L% rd in this proceeding granted CCANP an additional uixty (60) day < o unt11 June L.'., 1904.
On June H,
l' W,
- CCAK, fi1ed its motion requenting permtcrien to e :pand its brief by 7 '.3 pages 1. 0 a total of 145 panu.
fho AOLAU grantcd CCAN.o an additianal twenty (20) pages for
. total of ninety (90) pagen.
l On June Ob,
- 1984, UCANP
.s e n t it: 118 page appeal to all pa t t im.
CCANP 'iles this accompanying moti on asking the ASLAD to concid7 CCANP n briof os cubstantialiy in compliance with bath the Limo requirements and length requirements for CCAMP's L, ief 8407090119 840623 PDR ADOCK 05000498 A
G PDR DSVb 1
l 9
l 1
on apptml.
Pur2uant to 10 C.F.R.
Eertion
- 1. 7 0 ' t..)
the 65 LAD hc_
_dtscret:onary
.lur i a d i c t i en to accept CC1NP c brie!
a ';
f subst m a t i al l y i :1 comp!.ance with tbt dir ectivec of the c an: _r-i e n.
CCANP contendu ther e ar t;celiont reasono for the A5 LAD to do co.
lier delay i n. d e l l.< c r l i t q this brief to the nppeal Board will be no more than four days.
For a proceeding tiut han c.. itinued fcr moro than 11ve y e a r _;, e
-f c w day dolay in i n nub a t :3 n t i al.
CCANP moved for an addit 1onal ninett
( '70 )
d <>. y s and the Appeal Board granted an ndditional sixty (60) d a y <s.
CCAi!P ar,k rd fcr the amount cf time it hencutly believed would be required to produco a profersional and thorough appeal of tiie Partial Initial r,. c i s i o n.
The Appeal Bo ar d disagreed au to the amount of
< id i t i on al time but did grant some additional
- time, appnently finding rmrit in the cubstance of CCANP~s motion.
CCAMP did itu b cz ni to c e n.p l y with the ASLAB decition.
CCANP't chief reprmentative hau gone practically withcut <cicep for the last weeL trying to complete the brief.
As it ic, CCANP only t
at: ed the ABLAD's deadline by a few days.
Dae nf the recults of CCAN! r 'tchi ng to meet the deadline set I
by thc ASLAb wau an inabil ty to offectively coordinate all the utiurtn going.into the appeal or to take the time to edit and condense a t.
much as CCANP would'have if more tima had been available.
The renul ti ng b r i e f' is twenty-eight (29) pagen longer than the limit prc<1ded by the ASLAB.
CCAMP did aLk for an expansion af the brief cubnt ant i al-1 y 1
preater than the ASLAB provided. The request came after CCANP had worked on the appeal for a lengthy period.
The n un:b er of I
n.
A.=,
i-
different subjects to be addrenced and the pervasive error that appeared moved CCANP to acuk a mero than doublinq of the normal b'r i e f di v.
CCANP's appeal brief is in e:: cess of the limi*
e i
1 apacified by th!. AELAD by Inss than half the amount requested for e:: ten t i on by CCAf JP.
The prepareLion of t ii t? CC/W appeal brief fell to four valunteers, three of wh e rn arc Inw =,tudent; and the fourth a
recent graduate of law school preparing to t al;e the Bar EN c m 2 n a t, en. (CCANP al30 had thn benefit of two days censultatien wi.th au t. ;1 d c counsel.) Ac a reault, the coordination of the variou2 offorLc wat a difficult t a cl:.
i7i nall y,
CCANP believen the AELAb will find that the brief i
o, submitted la a subcLantive contribution to this proceedina, I.
I prcmenting a viewpoint and analysis available no where else.
f For the above and forecoing reasent, CCANP mo /es the Atomic j
Saf e' y and Licensing i' p p ea l Board to accept CC AIJP 's Etr i ef an Appeal
'f r ein the Parlial Initial Decision as substantially in cocpliancL' with both the timeliners and length requirements of I
the Commission.
Re;pectfully submitted,
- \\
Lenny.inkin Representative for Intervenor, Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, Inc.
114 W.
7th, Suite 220 Austin, Te:-: as 78701 June 23, 1tre?4 (511:) 478-7197 i
l i
t.h L_
O gm UNITEl> M ( tl i:3 UF A M E R I C f'-
t:UCLE Af< FEGULO f ORY COMMi% 2 GN QMMhk U L OlOE! l_t i L'KJ LY Odll !z If I I;!S lU- ) Olii '!~(4 'UllP in the Matter of HQiSTO 1 LIDHIING AND
/
Docket N :n. 50-<l98 OL IUWER COMF' ANY, ET AL.
1 5 & 4'79 Q -.
(Couth I c~ a Project, Units 1 and 2)
(
h e! < by c cr Li f y that cap:cc o+
CITIZENS CONCERNED ABOUT NUCLEAR
- POWER, INC.
(CCANP) MOTION TO BE FOUND IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE were
.e r '. e d by dopocit in the U.L.
Mail, Express Mail (w) or firnt ci at e post agr peid ta the fat 1cwing individual < and a n t'i t i r m on thia 25th day of June 19 0 't.
- Al an E.
Hcnenthal, Erqttire
- Christine N.
E' :h l Cha i r man Admi nl u,tr a ti' e Judge Atomic :d a i e t y end Lit. hp p e.; l Ud.
Atomic w C
Lic. App.
Bd.
[1, R.
Nut 1 oar Uequiatorv Commi' : ion U.
Nuclear Reg. Comm.
Waehtnqton, D.,.
2055b Washington, D.C.
JubSb
.* D i,
W.
Head Johnson Urien Da wick, Esauire idu ni c:.t rat) ve Judge As ;t. htt' t3 e n.
Alema c Cafoty and Lic. Appeal Bd.
State of Te;: as L
5.
Nuclear fwgulatory C o:nmi cti on En v 2 r.:;n mt l. P~otection Washinaton, D.C.
M 55 P
D.
1A -
' o b el S, Capital Sta.
Auctin, Te:' an 70711 d i<ob er L U.
Per1i9, Esquire O f f ii.e
- f the E :ec. Leq. Dir.
'J ic '
R.
N-wman, Ecquire
!!. S.
Ni tc l e ar Regulatory Comm.
1025 Connecticut Avenut, N.W.
Wcch i n r; t on,
D.C.
205Mb W a st i o g l:e n,
D.C.
200;6 Mel.wrt Schwar:, Esquire Atonic Safety and Licensing Bd.
l'aler and bottn U.E.
Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
300 One Shell Pl az a Washington, D.C.
20505 Hoi. s t on, Ienac 77002 Mrs. P ?qqy liuchorn t < er ut i vc Dir ertor, C.E U.
Atomic Saf ety and Licensing Rnute 1,
L:o s: 16.04 nppeal Board L!r a: or i a, Te. : m 7/4?2 U.S.
Nuc1 ear ~ncqu1atory Comm.
Wanhingtan, D.C.
JUE155 Wi i l i am S.
sJ a r d a n, III, Eng.
Ilarmon, Wei n Jorden Dotketing and Service Euction J001 9 itreet, N.W.,
Guite 430 Office of the Sacretary Wa <,h i n o t on,
D.C.
20A09 U.R.
Nuc1 ear Regulatcry.Comm.
Wan inqton, D.C.
20b5b Pat Coy
/
(7 - s 5106 Cana Or o dWu )QG Iut.,_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _
'4,n Antonio, Tm; a s 7FC33 Lan;y inkin
-