ML20092N587
| ML20092N587 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1984 |
| From: | Daltroff S PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20092N582 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8407030311 | |
| Download: ML20092N587 (2) | |
Text
"^
b' g
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2301 M ARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 PHILADELPHIA. PA.19101 SHIELDS L. DALTROFF s u l # J "A* 2 E o June 5, 1984 Docket No. 50-277 50-278 Mr.. Thomas-T. Martin, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'RegionLI-631 Park Avenue-King of Prussia, PA 19406
Dear Mr. Martin:
Your letter dated May 3, 1984, forwarded combined Inspection Report 50-277/84-08 and 50-278/84-08.
Appendix A addresses one item which does not appear to be in full compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commissloa requirements.
This' item is
- restited below along with our response:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action"
' requires that measures-be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected'and_in the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the corrective action precludes repetition.
Peach Bottom Quality Assurance Plan, Volume III, Program Section, Paragraph 16.1, " Corrective Action" states, in part, that " measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected."
.PECo defines conditions adverse to quality as ".
. non-lconformances to specified requirements."
Contrary to the above, as of March 30, 1984, nonconformances had not been corrected that had previously been identified on three separate occasions in Quality Assurance Audit Reports y
AP82-27, dated October 25, 1982f AP83-40, dated December 30, 1983 and AP84-13 (draft) regarding inadequate document
' control for procedures that control safety-related activities.
Superseded indices, missing pages, and deleted procedures were some of the problems associated with controlled copies of procedure books.
0
q-ca.
o Mr. Thom s T.. Martin June 5,- 1984 Page 2 This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
Response
This violation was caused by controlled procedure addressees failing to properly revise their controlled procedure notebooks.
To' prevent recurrence, clerical personnel assigned the task-of controlled copy notebook review will be reinstructed in the proper maintenance of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station controlled procedure books.
In addition, " Administrative Procedure.for Control and Use of Documents, A-2", will be revised to provide improved guidance on proper controlled procedure book maintenance.
These actions will be completed by July 30, 1984.
As documented in the response to Quality Assurance Division Noncompliance Reports AP82-27-04, AP83-40-02, and AP84-13t01, the specific inadequacies identified in the Quality Assurance'.
Audit Reports have been corrected.
6 s,t should you require additional information, please do'6cC.I.
hesitate to contact us.
7' Ut 5
very truly
- ours, f'$]
/
z ' k. +tCL %
cc:
A. R. Blough, Site Inspector I
l
_.