ML20092M969
| ML20092M969 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1992 |
| From: | Peevy J UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| ULNRC-2567, NUDOCS 9202280260 | |
| Download: ML20092M969 (5) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
hy n#t I'ulf U% r /W IN w n v u > ws 4
February 21,1992 ULNRC 2567
$LECTRK:
I E3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk hiail Station PI 137 Washington, DC 20$55 Centlemen:
In complying with the Fitness For Duty Rule,10CFR26.71(d), Recordkeeping Requirements,
)
please Gnd enclosed Union Electric's Callaway Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Program Pedormance j
Data for the six (6) month period beginning July 1,1991 and emling on December 31,1991.
Enclosures include:
Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data Attachment A Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 t
Random Testing Program Results/Condrmed Positives Attachment B Tests for Speel0c Substances (Five Year Record)
Fitness For Duty hianagement Action in regards to:
Attachment C
- Initiatives Taken i
- 1.essons Learned
- Reportable Fitness For Duty Events Under 10CFR26.73 If you have any questions in regards to the Performance Data Reported, please contact me at (314)676-8246.
t MY"W
_w, ames R. Peevy hianager, Operations Support (Fitness for Duty hianager)
JRP/RGR/Dn1K/bb I
h
- ranstunajb J'
R
.... _... _.,. -. _ _.. _ _ ~ ~. -.. _.. _ _ -., _
v cc:
A.13ert Davis, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 111 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn,IL 60137 R. L. IIague Chlef, Project Section 3C U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Region 111
- 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn,IL 60137 l
B. L. Ilartlett/D. R, Calhoun Resident NRC Inspector, Callaway Plant Callaway Resident Office -
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR #1 Steedman, MO 65077 L, R. Wharton (2 copies)
Licensing Project Manager, Callaway Plant Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stap 13 E 21 Washington, DC 20555 Shaw, Pittman, Potts, & Trowbridge 2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037 1
P-
.0 t
g e
.ry,
,-y..s,.,-.w-,,
,w.=-3,y,_,,--w.
,,,,,,, + _,, -
,~w--,w,,
.-v-
..,.m-
.---m-o.r.
. -. +. -,.
Fitness for Duty Program Perforinance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 20 l.lfil0'l ELEC T RIC COMPA!JY December 31, 1991 Curt ny g Wr e s (nd.rq CALL AWAY PLNIT tocaton (10f4fiA M. Kf40f Pfl Elfi 314/676-8211 cetaa name rta prae.an.coe.)
Cutoff s: Scre ervConfirmation (nryml)
O Appendix A to 10CFR 20 Marijuana 20 / 15 Amphetamines 1000/250 11 rhi t ura ter.
300/250 Cocaine 1 0 / 150 Phencyclidine 25/25 Deh7mila 7eni nes 300/250 Oplates 300 / 150 Alcchol(% DAC)
.04I
/
Long Term Short Term Testing Results Contractor Contractor Licensee Employees Personnel Personnel Average Nunter with Unescorted Access 1024 231 20 Referred Access Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restored Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre employment 22 0
0 0
0 0
Pre badging 18 0
24 0
32 0
Periodic 0
0 0
0 0
0 Forcause 0
0 0
0 0
0
_ _. =
Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 Random 509 0
125 0/1 12 0
Follow-up 2
0 0
0 0
0 Other 2
0 0
0 0
0 Total 553 0
149 1
44 0
ATTACHMENT A
[
,i
,l t
1!I I
I*
i li riI i;
?
U II T
N E
3 iii
,6 M
9 H
9 l
C 1
A iiI TTA i f i
6
,t il fi i
o iiI 299 1
se i,
cna o
n ts s
6 I
i b
t 4
u lu 6
S 5
1 0
G 0
0 0
0 0
s 1
c e
1 1
i R
f 9
.i eli 6
,6 i1 i
9 c
m 1
e 0
,IIi a
4 p
r 6
5 S
g 1
e I
n 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o~
r 1
r o
P f
s g
ts n
0 i
4 eT t
0 7
1 4
0 0
1 1
1 3
s 4
e 1
e 4
T v
0 i
9 t
m 9
i 1
s o
4 o
d 5
P 6
n 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
a 0
d R
e mr ifn oC 989 1
l i
5 4,* 2 1
W s
d e
e n
t s
i s
T s
e e
p e
e T
n i
a z
n t
e s
e e
im i
r a
d e
la i
i f
v a
v v
l a
c u
i u
oi n
e s
id it it t
P P
aP ij ia te e
y l
t d
t a
n s
hs u
h c
o i
o s
v o
o po r
a o
ia p
n h
b z
i r
c e
o r
n p
m h
lc
~
h G%
M C
O - A P
A B
B a
e l
e W
I.
,,1
e d
Ellilthifor Duty 3111111111t1Hi'111 Afiluti liddallitiluktti Initiatives taken during this reporting period have been minor in nature. Program changes implemented were to gairr efficiency in the FFD Program and/or to correct weaknesses identified in the program. These initiatives taken were a result of Quality Assurance Audits /Surveillances and areas that were self-identified by FFD Program Administration.
Imons IA1tintd i
in comparing the random selection program for years 1990 and 1991, we have learned the program is operating in a consistent raanner.
% of indigiduals
% of Indliiduals Randomly I'rohtted to Indisiduals TOTAIS Selected -
Randomly Screen Randomly Screened 1990 / 1991 1990 / 1991 (Annually)
Screened Zero:
486 455 32.53 35.38 36.8 Screened Once 659 504 44.11 39.19 36.8 Screened Twice 243 207 16.27 16.10 18.4 Screened Three Times 82 74 5.49 5.75 6.1 Screened Four Times 18 30 1.20 2.33 1.5 l
Screened Five Times 5
4
.33
.31
.3 l
Screened Six Times i
1
.07
.08
.0 Cumulative Average 1990 / 1991 Random Tests 1990 / 1991 Population =
1477 l 1275 Conducted =
1494 l 1286 in reviewing NRC Inspection reports of other utility's FFD programs has helped linton Electric to identify areas of strengths and weaknesses in our program. One specific area of note in which Union Electric implemented action as a direct result of these reviews was to accelerate weekend /
holiday testing and focus on void time slots during backshifts when testing was not being performed t
in attending the FFD seminar last October in Houston, Texas, it was suprising to learn the confusion that still exists from utility to utility on the implementation / interpretation of 10CFR26.
1 However, in exchanging information with other utilities at the seminar and in review of NRC (1991) inspection reports of other utility's FFD Programs, has provided Union Electric with data that may initiate additional changes during 1992 to enhance our current program and ensure full compliance with 10CFR26.
(
Jhrn11.Rrported in Accordance With 10CfRE23 l
No events occurred during this reporting period re.juiring reporting in accordance with l
NITACilMENT C
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -