ML20091Q444
| ML20091Q444 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 04/20/1984 |
| From: | Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19270C238 | List: |
| References | |
| 28026, 84-04-#1, 84-4-#1, NUDOCS 8406140036 | |
| Download: ML20091Q444 (19) | |
Text
.
l, l
O Consurners Power Company v.- ~..s - - ~ n o, -,
as ca.umawa l
c.....eonw
- ions w..
e.,a.o a..o. 4.o
- a. m aeroi. isin ras c4s2 April 20, 1984 84-04 #1 Mr J G Keppler US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn,'IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT FINAL REPORT ON POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE CONDITIONS SEISMIC AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCERNS FILE:
0.4.9.91 SERIAL:
28026 r
3ecause of discrepancies in the original seismic calculations, the following Safety Concerns and Reportability Evaluations (SCREs) were issued: SCRE 9
-Category I structures were analyzed with a nominal soil modulus without considering the variation of :50% as required by the FSAR; SCRE 15 - for the seismic analysis of the diesel' generator building, the material stiffness for soil under the building was assumed to be the same as undisturbed till material instead of fill material; and SCRE 42 - Use of Bechtel Computer Program CE-931 which overestimated the composite modal damping, which resulted in an underestimation of the building responses for the reactor and auxiliary buildings.
In addition, SCRE 19 lists both seismic and structural concerns identified as a result of a CPCo review of the civil structural design calculations. The items on SCRE 19 vere discussed with Messrs Landsman and Gardner of NRC Region III Inspection and Evaluation during a March 22, 1984 meeting with Bechtel and Consumers Power Company. provides a more detailed description and the circumstances under uhich the items were discovered. In each case: the original evaluation was that the discrepancies and concerns, respectively, were not reportable under 10CFR50.55(e), but that further evaluation would be necessary for confirmation.
In actuality, the engineering analysis supporting cverall plant design and resolution of the SCREs has resulted in two basic categories in terms of making a final safety evaluation of the SCRE concerns.
1.
Concerns identified in the SCREs, which in fact, have been analyzed c'
tc their original design basis and configuration and have been
- " "'"*d ' " ' "' ' ' ""*'
f?9fofl6/6CL?d7
[
Equipment / system or structural modifications have occurred, (for 6
various reasons) and the engineering analyses have not been performed to the original design basis and configuration. Thus the project has 9
j' 2
84-04 #1 Serial 28026 not made an absolute confirmation as to nonreportability of subject SCRE concerns. This is specifically true of SCREs 9, 15, 42 and some of the items associated with SCRE 19.
Consumers Power has decided to classify these SCREs as potentially reportable.
This is because conditions of the original plant design for category 2 above will remain indet cminate as to actual reportability.
These concerns are classified potentially reportable as no actual case has been identified where the original structure or components would not pe rfo rm their intended function as required by the original design criteria. Changes in other loads, such as the dead loads, live loads, thermal loads, pipe break loads, etc.
which are combined with the seismic loads, could have caused the increased stresses which required plant modification or equipment replacenent. The effect of the specific discropant conditions identified in SCREs 9, 15, and 42, in contributing to the need for equipment replacement or plant modification is not identifiable from che current plant design analysis.
None of the' SCRE 19 items have been classified as a nonconforming condition.
Some of the analysis in current plant d 31gn wh'ich addresses items listed on SCRE 19 may have contributed to plant design changes.
Of the 50 items originally identified in SCRE 19, only six are currently open. These will be resolved through ongoing analyses using current design criteria and thus, like the other SCRE concerns, initial evaluation of the nonreportability of the original conditions will not be verified.
To ensure all changes in seismic criteria and additional stresses are incorporated into the final plant configuration, the floor accelerations have been recalculated, and the structures have been reevaluated. Reevaluation of all piping systems, preparation of Seismic Qualification Revi:2 Team (SQRT) documentation involving review of all' equipment seismic qualification, and a pump and valve operability review are tasks now in progress.
In conclusion, Consumers Power has decided to classify the subject SCREs as potentially reportable because systems have been changed and equipment has been replaced for reasons which a subject SCRE may have contributed to, and the concerns will not be analyzed to the original design. Since all required changes as documented in the SCREs have been incorperated into the latest calculations, the final plant design is assured to meet current design criteria and commitment to safety.
As can be seen from Attachment 1, each of the items was discovered through a design review process. The specific discrepancies identified are random and isolated. The review processes have provided a comprehensive look at the civil / structural design erea. The review results have caused an increased awareness of design packaging and individual design detail necessary to produce acceptable design.
It is felt that the past intensive overall reviews, in combination with our current Proj ect Engineering design practices required by Engineering Department Procedures, MPQAD monitors and audits, and CPCo Engineering design overview provide an appropriate overall design review system. No additional specific corrective action is required. This is the OC0284-0041A-MP01
i s'
3 84-04 #1 Serial 28026 final report or this potentially reportable situation.
If significant discrepancies are detected during the review prograns, appropriate notification in accordance with 10CFR50.55(c) vill be made.
su<a N.&vL JWC/PWJ/lr CC: Document Control Desk, USSRC vDhood, USNRC Office of NRR Washington, DC Bethesda, MD RJCook, NRC Resident Inspector INPO Records Center Midland Nuclear Plant 0
OC0284-0041A-MP01
o o
/
4
/
64-04 #1 Serial 28026 OM/0L SERVICE LIST Mr Frank J Kelley Atomic Safety & Licensin.3 Attorney General of the Appeal Board State of Michigan U S Nuclear Regulatory Commis.on Ms Carole Steinberg Washington, DC 20555 Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Mr C R Stephens (3) 720 Law BuildinF Chief, Docketing & Services Lansing MI 48913 U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary Washington, DC 20555 Mr Myron M Cherry, Esq Suite 3700 Ms Mary Sinclair Three First National Plaza 5711 Summerset Street Chicage, IL 60602 Midland, MI 48640 Mr Wendell' H Marshall Mr William D Paton, Esq RFD 10 Counsel for the NRC Staff Midland, MI 48640 U S Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, DC 20555 Mr Charles Bechhoefer, Esq Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel
'U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission East-West Towers, Room E-413 Washington, DC 20555 Bethesda, MD 20014 Ms Barbara Stamaris Dr Frederick P.Cowan 5795 North River Road 6152 N Verde Trail Rt 3 Apt B-125 Freeland, M1 48623 Boca Raton, FL 33433, Dr Jerry Harbour -
Mr Fred C Williams Atomic Safety & Licensing Isham, Lincoln & Beale Board Panel 1120 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 840 C S Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Washington, DC 20036 East-West Towers, Room E-454 Bethesda, 10 20014 Mr James E Brunner, Esq Consumers Power Company' Mr M I Miller,'Esq 212 West Michigan Avenue Isham, Lincoln & Beale Jackson, MI 49201 Three First National Plaza 52nd Floor Chicagc, IL 60602 OC0284-0041A-MP01
../
/
5 84-04 #1 Serial 28026 Mr D F Judd Babcock & Wilcox PO Box 1260 Mr.1chn Demeester, Esq Lynchburg, VA 24505 Dow Chemical Building Michigan Division Mr Steve Gadler, Esq Midland MI 48640 2120 Carter Avenue St Paul, MN 55108 Ms Lynne Eernabei Government Accountability Proj ect Mr P Robert Brown 1901 Q Street, NW Clark, Klein & Beaumont Washington, DC 20009 1600 Firs't Federal Bldg
- 'codward Ave Detroit, MI 48226 3/14/84 o
r-
'I OCO284-0041A-MP01
.F 1
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY
OF SCRE CONCERNS AS ORIGINALLY ISSUED i
SCRE 9 During the FSAR rereview, it was determined that there were some inconsistencies in the FSAR with regard to variations of soil modulus i
and effects on structural frequencies. With-regard to structural adequacy, a check of seismic response forces within the major seismic Category 1structuresforgvariagionofsoilmodulusof 2 50% from
-the nominal value (22 x 10 lb/ft ) as indicated by FSAR 2.5.4.7, is i
in process. Our opinion at this time is that-the structures, in the configurations currently depicted in the FSAR, will be capable of carrying out their intended safety functions.
With regard to safety-related e,quipment-within these structures, we have applied the option allowed in Section C.2 of Regulatory Guide 1.122, ie, to broaden the peaks associated with structural i
frequencies by t15%.
In:sogoing,ye.haveutilizedthenominalvalue of soil modulus (ie, 22 x 10 lb/ft ) for both the SSE and OBE. On this basis, for the structural configurations currently depicted in.
j the FSAR, it is believed that the systems would be able to carry out 4
their-intended safety functions.
l SCRE 15 During the course of preparing for the structural and seiss.ic design i
audit, it was discovered that in the original seismic analysis of the diesel generator building, the material stiffness of the site fill had
{
been inadvertently chosen to be the same as the undisturbed till material.
SCRE 19 During preparation for the NRC etructural' audit, it was established that various engineering activities related to._ plant. design require additional attention to document full compliance-with Project licensing and/or design criteria. The Bechtel prepared list does not include items covered by previous SCREs or existing MCARs.
In..
addition, certain issues raised-by Consumers Power Company during the audit-preparation need to be-integrated (as appropriate) into the listing.
None o'f the presently identified items are deemed reportable at this' time'due.co the lack of any indicated safety impact..In all cases,.
appropriate anlayses.will be conducted by Bechtel to determine the-actual situation relative-to potential-impact on plant safety.
SCRE 42 During the. January 129. 1982' seismic' design status review seeting in'
. Ann Arbor, Bechtel presented a floor response ~ spectrum curve for.the reactor building-comparing the' original spectra with the current i
spectra. The comparison indicates a degree of nonconservatise in the original-spectra at certain frequencies..The nonconservatism in the 4
original spectra appears to be the result of the-original use of.
CE-931,1which resulted in a composite modal damping which was too:
high.' BLC-11329,datedAugus't[14, 1981,. stated _that the use-of
+
y,-
CE-931 was not a safety problem due to other offsetting factors; however, the spectra comparison presented on January 29 indicates that CE-931 did, in fact, result in a spectra which was too low.
l The new seismic analysis which is underway will determine the adequacy of the reactor building design.
Bechtel advised during the January 29 meeting that the original design had sufficient margin relative to the nonconservative spectra; however, final determination regarding reportability cannot be made until the new analysis is complete.
W e
T O
4 l
e OCO284-0041A-MP01
n L.D=u=
vAFETY CONCERN AN.
"%A'#u%'#f "
es,p[y$
REPORTABILITY EVALUATION u-eur.u n m u m ee o w n w race 1 y h.
n0W uS CONCERN roENT1r2ED, w EN WaEaE2 TO MANA(;ER-MPQA During the FSAR rereview, it was detemined that there 1 N M:
vere scne inconsistencies in the FSAR vith regard to ORGANIZATION: Design Prod variations of soil modulus and effects on structural
'SCRE NO:
9 frequencies. Refer to FSAR sections 2 5.h.7, 3.7.2.h, FILE NO: 15.1 3.7.2 5, 3.7.2 9, and Appendix 3A (Response to Reg DATE RECEIVED: 2/h/81 Guide 1.122).
- 2. IS CONCERN A PART 21?
WHDi?
BY WHOM?
- 3. IS HRC AWAFI OF THIS?
O YES Y MO (CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE)
WHEN
BY W OM?
5.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN - SYSTEM, COMPONENT, ACTIVITY, POSSIBLE SAFETY IIGACT -
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS).
The FSAR sections are _ now in the process of reviev and revision to resolve inconsistencies between sections and within sections. This vill be ccrapleted in the near future.
With regard to structural adequacy, a check of seismic response forces within the major seismic Category 1 structyes fog)a vaiiation of soil modulus of + 50%
from the nominal valve (22 x 10 lb/ft as indicated by FSAR 2.5.h.7, is in process. Our opinion at this time is that the structures, in th,e configurations, (Cont'd)
(CONTINUE ON NEXT PACE)
I:i/EDIATE REPOP.TABILITY EVALUATION:
7 GRGANIZATION REPONSIBLE FOR FURTHER O REPORTABLE
- GO TO 13 EVALUATION:
. O FC'"I::T: ALLY REPORTABLE - GO TO 13 Bechtel Project Encineerinc NCrt FITORTAELE, FURTHER EVALUATICN 8.
FINAL REPORTABILITY EVALUATIO.i FIT f..
C
):
. O ::CT REFCET!d C
[K] R@gcudh
,o. L,J ::cT EEPOETA3LE g
c-QA ATFRU!AL OF E7ALUATIO::
f BLOCT.S 1 TO 7:
M1 W R Bird MANAGER - IGQA DATE 2/h/82 wSIIT:CATIC:: OF IVALUATION - (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCU:Ei:TS)
Based on information in Block 5, there is confidence that the first reportability a.
criterion is not met (ie, no adverse impact on safety).
The completion of ongoinc structural (seismic) analysis is required to confirm this.
t.
The second reportability criterien that could be applicable is "a significant departure frcm the final design as approved and released fer cer.s ;ruction such that the design does not confom to the criteria and bases stated in the Safety Analysis Report."
(CONTINUE ON'NEXT PAGE)
EVALUATOR'S SIGilATURE/DATE:
- 32. FINAL QA AFPROVAL - MANAGER MPQA/DATE:
N 4M8 7
%/gp NRC NOTIFICATION: ROW 7 j//5 [g t[
DATE:
TIME: Ce p. r+r,
INDIVIDUAL NOTIFIED:
b $ drd a ce-4 RErERENCE: Q c.R.
C 6 Fik &
260s3 9650gy13
[
,a PAOJE CTS, [NGIN(( RING SAFETY CONCERN A..J
.=umm
-o c=:1au:1mN-POV
"*4f"Y REPORTABILITY EVALUATION OUAuTY ASSURANCE DE sc"I no:
QA70-0 PAGE 2 h.
CONTINUED 5
CONTINUED currently depicted in the FSAR, vill be capable of carrying out their intended safety functions.
With regard to safety-related equipment within these structures, we have applied the option allowed in Section C.2 of Regulatory Guide 1.122, ie, to broaden the peaks associated with structural frequencies by + 15%. 6 n so poing, we have I
utilized the nominal value, of soil modulus (ie, 22 x 10 lb/ft ) for both the SSE and OBE.
On this basis, for the structural configurations currently depicted in the FSAR, it is believed thtt the systems vould be able to carry out their intended safety functions.
10.
CONTINUED The SAR vill be revised to reflect the actual design approach being used for structures and equipment.
Final Evaluation See oral coccunication record of 3/15/84 for basis to declare this item potentially reportable.
3/22/84 Lk.
MZHIMUM DISTRIBUTION:
15 ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION:
RCBauman, P1h-312B VICE PRESIDENT - PE&C IllCurtis, Becht'l AA e
VICE PRESIDDIT - MIDLAND PROJECT GREagle/RLRixford, Bechtel AA DIRECTOR - ENVIRON miTAL SERVICES & QA JMilandin, Bechtel AA MIDLAND SITE MANAGER JARutgers, Bechtel AA SITE QA SUPERINTENDDIT SLSobkovski, Bechtel AA MANAGER - SAFETY & LICDISING NWSvanberg, Bechtel'AA v.i m e,2 " r & _s.m,,.
96502714
.. ~..
~
Fntineurp 't I4 PaoJECTs.tnGtNttr.in Nc===
SAFETY CONCERN AnD
.~o castaucuou-8 Powtf oUALITY / SSURANCE DEPARTMENT s'"4'_1 REPORTABILITY EVALUATION GAGE 1 y
4.
HOW WAS CONCEM IDENTIFIED, WHEN, WHERE7 I TO MANAGER-MPQA During the cc.: se of preparing for the NRC's
- 1. FROM: B F Henley Structural and Seismic Design Audit, this concern ORGANIZATION: Design Prod.
was brought to Consumers attention in a meeting in SCRE NO:
15 the Bechtel Ann Arbor offices on April 3,1981.
FILE NO: cIS.I.15.i DATE RECEIVED: h/7/81
- 2. IS CONCERU A PART 21?
YES Q NO BY WHOM7
- 3. IS NRC AWARE OF THIS?
YES NO (CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE)
B OM?
5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN - SYSTEM, C0!GONENT, ACTIVITY, POSSIBLE SAFETY IMPACT -
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS).
In Bechtel's original seismic analysis of the Diesel Generator Building, it has been determined that the material stiffness of the site fill had been inadvertently chosen to be the same as the undisturbed till material. Bechtel should proceed at once to i
perform a safety impact evaluation for any possible effects on the Diesel Generator structure and internal equipment.
(CONTICUE ON HEXT PAGE) 6.
I!cEDIATE REPORTABILITY EVALUATION.
7.
ORGANIZATION REPONSIBLE FOR FURTHER
- a. O REPORTABLE
- GO TO 13 EVALUATION:
Bechtel En 'neerinc
- t. O POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE - Go TO 13
- c. < NOT F.E?ORTABLE, FURTHER EVALUATION E.
FINAL REPOR! ABILITY ETALUATIO;;
d.
UCT RE$0RTABLE (IT '.. CH"KED)
E- @P
$N 1
NOT REFORTABLE 9
M AFFRC7AL OF E7ALUATION
', / y
^
^
OF ELCCFS 1 TO 7:
sf'/ N #
- Y
- /-
MANAGER - 17QA
JUSTIFICATION OF EVALUATION - (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS)
Final Evaluation See oral communication record of 3/15/84 for basis to declare this item potentially reportable.
3/22/84 (CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) 11.
EVALUATOR'S SIGNATURE /DATE:
- 12. FINAL QA APP OVAL - MANAGER MPQA/DATE:
ls +7 d &
9[39154 h[eg e3h f/ g Ti!E: I#C0 Pe*t
- 13. URC NOTIFICATION: HOW7 DATE:
INDIVIDUAL NOTIFIED: A.m (ped n e, 86561965
REFERENCE:
C.- (.4 c4ron F,* /e dc) :
200 SS
commm SAFETY CONCERN A.,D PRO)L CTS. E NGINE E RING POWtf
- c==Ucn--
S"'
REPORTABILITY EVALUATION CUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT CA'iO-O scaz :;o: 25 h.
CONTINUED PAGE 2 CO:iTI!!UED CONTINUED
!GNIMUM DISTRIBUTION:
iI 15.
ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTIO::
VICE PRESIDENT - PE&C BCMcConnell
/ ICE PRESIDENT - MIDLAND PROJECT LHCurtis SSobkovski'
)IRECTOR -
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & QA CDIJJ!D SITE MANAGER MADietrich IITE QA SUPERINTENDDIT TJohnson JARutgers 1ANAGER - SAFETY & LICDiSINC SIDLAND FILE NO iS.t 96561966
i
.o A/I A S197h Tr' t: DI.T Priority:
5
' U/Syst: FITTS3 h
~'
- ==
PAOJECTs. E!?GINEERING SAFETY CONCERN AND um como:1mN-CUAUTY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT 72,5 REPORTABILITY EVALUATION 0
,Act 1 y
u.
u0w us CONCERN m Enr m ED, waEx, vu =
TO MANAGER-MPQA During the January 29, 1982 seismic design status
- 1. FROM:RCBauman, P1h-312B review meeting in Ann Arbor, Bechtel presented a ORGAHIZATION: Design Prod.
floor response spectrum curve for the reactor building comparing the original spectra with the SCFI NO: h2 FILE NO:
current spectra. The comparison (attached) indicates 25,1 a degree of non-conservatism in the original spectra DATI FICEIVED:
2/2/82 at certain frequencies.
- 2. IS CD:iCERn A PARI 21?
O YE-O NO MBEN?
BY Wh0M7
- 3. IS NRC iWARE OF TEISS O YES @ NO (CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) warn-37gjoM?
5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN - SYSTEM, COMPONENT, ACTIVITY, POSSIBLE SAFETY IlGACT -
(ATTACE SUPPORTDIG DOCUMENTS).
The non-conservatism in the original spectra as shown on the compari$on dated I
1/27/82 appears to be a result of the original use of}E-931 which resulted in a composite model damping which was too high.
BLC-11329 (attached), dated August 14, 1981, stated that the use of CE-931 was not a saf'ety problem due to cther off-setting factors, however the snectra comparisor. nresanted on January 29 indicates that CE-931 did in fact result in a spectra which was too lov.
j The new seismic analysis which is underway vill determine the ad'eouacy of the reactor buildinF design.
.(CCNTIN'.T ON KEXT PAGE) 6.
It'!IDIATE REPORTAE!LITY EVALUATIOK-7.
ORGANIZATION REPOnSIBLE FOR FURTHER
- a. O PI?ORTABLE
- GO TO 13 EVALUATION:
- t. O POTEnTIALLY REFORTABLE - Go TO 13 3* ht*1 _"Fi"**" ""
c.G NOT FIPOR:'AELE, FURTHER EVALUATION 6.
FINAL PI" ORT /.EILITY EVALUATIOE
- d. O NOT REPOETAELE (IT 6.c. CEECT v' ??6MkiLA'D/:t. O NO~ RE=0?.TA~v 9.
0A AFFROVAL OF EVAL 2ATIOn o
OF ELOC S 2 TO 7:
W
$ 2_
MANAGER - MDQA DATE 10.
JUSTIFICATION OF EVALUATION - (A"' TACH SUPPORTING DOCUMfRTS)
Bechte; acvised during the January 29 meeting that the original design had sufficient margin relative to the non-conservative spectra, however final detemination regarding reportability cannot be made until the new analysis is complete.
Final Lvaluation See oral communication record of 3/15/84 for basis to declare this item potentially reportable.
3/22/84 (CONTINUE ON KEXT PAGE) 1.
EVALUATOR'S SIGNATURE /DATE:
- 12. FINAL QA "" OVAL - MANAGER ICQA/DATE:
W%
wn
)
3fa>/ cry 13.
fiRC EOTIFICATION: HOW? %/%3 DATE: g [jf -
gTIKE:
/*f.
INDIVIDUAL NOTIFIED: h Qde
%} Q4 d # M$ khA ' ba Ifr 1 ), >
- 280II FITEPINCI:
PROJECTS. [NGINEE RING SAFETY CONCERN
.JD
.no Co=uction-ce===
Powtf cuAuTY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
'"P
REPORTABILITY EVALUATION
. SCPI H0: 42 PAGE 2 QA70-0 h.
CONTINUED 5
CONTINUED
~
10.
CO!ITINUED A
1k.
MINIMUM DISTRABUTION:
15 ADDITIONAL DISTRIEC ION:
^
RCBauman MADietrich i
VICE PRESIDDIT - PE&C LHCurtis GSKeeley VICE PRESIDENT - IGDLAND PROJECT DIRECTOR - DIVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & QA TRThiruvengadam JAMooney RAWells MIDLAND SITE MANAGER l
SITE QA SUPERINTDiDENT MNI AGER - SAFETY & LICENSING 36700091
~ MIDLAND FILE NO 151 e
e
Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation b39aa77 777 East Eisennower Parxway Ann Aroot, Mcnyan
- a u.num P O. Box 1000. Ann Atoor,2chgan 48106 August 14, 1981 i
BI.C-11329 T,
Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road AUC1) 2 Jackson, Michigan 49201 EDUNDPROJECT gigg[%}
Attention:
Mr. 1.C. 34uman Design Production Manager
Subject:
Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Consumers Power Company Bechtel Job 7220 Safety Implications -
CE931 Program This addresscs t 2e safety implications for the Midland Project of a concern regarciug the application of the CE931 program used in the
~
seismic analysis of Seismic Category I structures. This concern is that the CE931 progrom may calculate composite modal damping that is coo high in some cases. The CE931 program has been used in seismic analys's to calculate composite modal damping for all Seismic Category I s".cetures on the Midland Project. However, investigations have shews that this concern is applicable only to the reactor buildings.
The concern for the reactor building is in damping for the rocking mode for both the east-vest and north-south directions. The composite modal damping for this mode has been calculated in 1976 as approximately 12%.
l This value has been calculated in 1981 as approximately 5 for a slightly -
revised seismic model for the east-west direction. Using various veri-fication techniques, we have concluded that approximately 5% is une -
correct damping for this application. Since the 1976 model yields lovet responses than the 1981 model, the question of a potential safety concern arises for seismic qualifications performed using the 1976 seismic model.
Based upon our. investigations, we believe that there is no identified saf ety deficiency for the following reasons; 1.
- The structure is pattially embedded in soil. This effect will.
decrease response.and was not considered in the 1976 analysis.
2.
Crecit was not taken for soil material damping -and SSE concrete material damping in the 1976 analysis.
3.
CE931 calculated a compositive modal damping of 12%, however,- a conservative limitation of 10 was used in the 1976 analysis to develop seismic response spectra and structural responses. This limitation is specified in BC-TOP-4-A and is referenced in the FSAR.
i
I
^
Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation BLC-11329 Page 2 039377 Ausust 14, 1981 The schedule impact of the resolution of this concern is shown in Schedule EPS-0119, Rev B.
This impact is due to the abandonment of the CE-931 program and the substitution of the verified BSAP program in th' !. application.
Very truly yours,
- p. L. >L &arl J L.H. Curtis Project Engineer SLS/kje(C) 7/23/7 cc:
P.3. Miller W. Bird I:i: '" n'""
M Uritten Response Requested:
No
W m=m SAF'ETY CONCERN /
Daciosure CJ'c'd#u'N'T
'kD POWtf ouAury AssunAncE orpAnwtuT fyll REPORTABILITY EVALUATION t
PAGE 3 y
u.
now u S CONCERN 2 DENT 1r1ED, unEU, waERE2 TO MANAGER-MPOA The issues covered by this SCRE vere identified by
- 1. FROM:
RCBauman Bechtel and Consumers Power during preparation OP.GANI'4AT10:::
Desi,n Prod for the April 20 NRC structural audit. Additional SCRE NO:
19 items rny be identified during the audit.
, FILE NO:
15.1 DATE RECEIVED: h /20/81
'. IS CU;;CER.! A PART 2I?
2 Q YES Q NO BY WHOM7
- 3. IS NRC AWARE OF THIS?
YES NO (CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE)
OM?
5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN - SYSTEv., COMPONENT, ACTIVITY, POSSIBLE S tz.d IFPACT -
( A'ITACH SUPPORTING DOCU!ENTS).
During preparation for' the NRC structu'ral audit, it was established that various engineering activities related to plant design require additional attent.icn to document full compliance with Project licensing and/or design criteria. These items were discussed with Bechtel on April 13 and are summarized on the attached Bechtel prepared list which does not include items covered by previous SCRE's or existing MCAR's.
In addition, certain issues raised by Consumers Power Company during the audit preparation need to be integrated (as appropriate) into the listing.
(CONTINUE O!! NETT PA",E) 6.
ITCEDIATE REPORTA3ILITY EVALUATIO ::
7..
ORGANIZATION REP 0;;SIELE FOR FUh2F.E:4 a.[-] REPORTABLE
- GO TO 13 EVALUATION:
b.
POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE - GO TO 13 Bechtel Project E::pincering c.
3 NOT REP 0FfABLE, TURTHER EVALUATION 8.
FINAL REFORTABILIT' EVALUATION (IT
.c.
'C ED :
ED ={O W (H'h
)b O =0T aEv0RTA3Lr d.O NOT REPORTA3LE e
9 QA APPRO?AL OF E7ALUATION v/ m Cg
.2/h/
0F ELOOPS I TO 7:
vr:AcEP - ;Tu.
- E 10.
JUSTIFICATION OF EVALUATION - (A': TACH SUPPORTING DOCUME!:TS)
None of the presently identified itees are, deemed reportable at this time due to the lack of any indicated safety impact.
In all cases,' appropriate analyses vill be conducted' by Bechtel to determine the attual situation relative to potentinI inpact on plant safety.
Final Evaluation See oral communication record of 3/15/84 for basis to declare this item potentially reportable.
3/22/84 I
(CONTINUE'03 NEXT PACE) 11.
EVALUATOR'S SIGNATURE /DATE:
- 12. FINAL QA APPROVAL - MANAGER MPQA/DATE:
pfw wlm wrHLJ bbY
'7'((cw DATE:
.13.
NRC NOTIFICATION: HOW!
j[ff/p <[ TIMfflG.503sg.17* A b (pf bt.r.
INDIVIDUAL NOTIFIED:
REFERENCE:
C>cM Ok% $ d e k gog3
~
1 r-JAFETY CONCERN Al "ffAA"4M'a"?
/,s;T' s
REP 0RTABILITY EVALUATION
""""'sEE'I:o'""IU""
O PAGE 2 1
CONTINUED 4
1 5
CONTINUED 10.
CCNTINUED l
1 14 MINIMUM DISTRIBUI' ION:
15 ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION:
VICE PRESIDENT - PE&C VICE PRESIDENT - MIDLAND PROJECT BFHenley u gers DIRECTOR - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & QA 8
MIDLAND SITE lW1AGER SITE QA SUPERINTENDENT-DMTurnbull SG503609 MAN AGER - SAFETY & LICENSING DMBudzik MIDLAND TILE NO 15,1 TRThiruvengadam
CONSUMERS Projects, Engineering POWER and Construction COMPANY Midland Project Quality Assurance Department ORAL COMMUNICATIONS RECORD Chron File No:
28053 j
Page 1 of 2 3
Date of Communication: 3/15/84 MPQA Personnel Participating: W R Bird Time of Communication: 5:00 PM Other Party (s): Ron Gardner, NRC Region III Prepared By: W R Bird i
Projects and/or Subjects Discussed: POTENTIAL REPORTABLE ITEM CONCERNING STRUCTURAL DESIGN Summary of Conversation: SCREs 9, 15, 19 and 42 represent conditions identified in the original seismic and structural design.
Specifically:
4 9 - Structures were analyzed with a nominal versus the FSAR Required i 50% soils modulus.
15 - Soil stiffness under the diesel generator building was assumed to be from undisturbed till versus fill in the seismic calculation.
19 - Seismic and structural concerns from the Bechtel/CPCo review of civil structural design in 1981.
42 - For the reactor building there was too high of a modal damping in' computer codeCh-931.
MIO384-0025A-MP01
Page 2 of 2 l
i I
The original conclusion as to reportability was that the conditions were not reportable but that further analysis was required to confirm. Our current deisgn is not representative of the original design conditions. Thus, at the point in time our design analysis is supporting final hardware. Thus we are not in a position to make a clear datermination that all of the items represented by the SCREs were in f act not reportable.
The basis for our immediate evaluation remain valid to suppo.3 the belief that the items in fact do not represent a significant safety condition. Howeter, criteria has changed and hardware has been modified. We are taking the position to declare these items potentially reportable in order to cl.ose them. A formal written report will be submitted by April 13, 1984. Closure will be through demonstrating that our final design meets the final design criteria.
4 WRB/1r CC: JWCook, P26-336B JEBrunner, M-1079 DMBudzik, P24-517A MADietrich, Midland GREagic, TASK AA RJErhardt, P14-113A LSGibson, P24-618A RCHollar, Bechtel PWJacobsen, P14-414 DTPerry, Midland EBPoser, Bechtel DLQuamme, Midland GLRichardson, Bechtel JARutgers, Bechtel RAWells, Midland NRC Resident Inspector, Midland RNGardner, NRC Region III MIO384-0025A-MP01
1
@ CORSumef3 e
Power company v.- ~.u - - ~,,u a w.,,
and Constructaan oeneral offices 1945 West Pernell Road, Jackson. MI 49201. ($17) 788 0453 April 20, 1984 84-04 #1 Mr J G Keppler US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT FINAL REPORT ON POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE CONDITIONS SEISMIC AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCERNS FILE:
0.4.9.91 SERIAL: 28026 Because of discrepancies in the original seismic calculations, the following Safety Concerns and Reportability Evaluations (SCREs) were issued: SCRE 9
-Category I structures were analyzed with a nominal soil modulus without considering the variation of 250% as required by the FSAR; SCRE 15 - for the seismic analysis of the diesel generator building, the material stiffness for soil under the building was assumed to be the same as undisturbed till material instead of fill material; and SCRE 42 - Use of Bechtel Computer Program CE-931 which overestimated the composite modal damping, which resulted in an underestimation of the building responses for the reactor and auxiliary buildings.
In addition, SCRE 19 lists both seismic and structural concerns identified as a result of a CPCo r3 view of the civil structural design calculations. The items on SCRE 19 were discussed with Messrs Landsman and Gardner of NRC Region III Inspection and Evaluation during a March 22, 1984 meeting with Bechtel and Consumers Power Company, Attachment I provides a more detailed description and the circumstances under which the items were discovered. In each case, the original evaluation was that the discrepancies and concerns, respectively, were not reportable under 10CFR50.55(e), but that further evaluation would be necessary for confirmation.
In actualicy, the engineering analysis supporting overall plant design and resolution of the SCREs has resulted in two basic categories in terms of making a final safety evaluation of the SCRE concerns.
l 1.
Concerns identiffed in the SCREs, which in fact, have been analyzed i
to their original design basis and configuration and have been demonstrated to not be safety concerns, or 2.
Equipment / system or structural modifications have occurred, (for hg various reasons) and the engineering analyses have not been performed to the original design basis and configuration. Thus the project has hh.
y@.
OC0284-0041A-MP01
2 84-04 #1 Serial 28026 not made an absolute confirmation as to nonreportability of subject SCRE concerns. This is specifically true of SCREs 9, 15, 42 and some of the items associated with SCRE 19.
Consumers Power has decided to classify these SCREs as potentially reportable.
This is because conditiens of the original plant design for category 2 above will remain indeterminate as to actual reportability.
These concerns are classified potentially reportable as no actual case has been identified where the original structure or components would not perform their intended function as required by the original design criteria. Changes in other loads, such as the dead loads, live loads, thermal loads, pipe break loads, etc, which are combined with the seismic loads, could have caused the increased stresses which required plant modification or equipment replacement. The effect of the specific discrepant conditions identified in SCREs 9, 15, and 42, in contributing to the need for equipment replacement or plant modification is not identifiable from the current plant design analysis.
None of the SCRE 19 items have been classified as a nonconforming condition.
Some of the analysis in current plant design which addresses items listed on SCRE 19 may have contributed to plant design changes. Of the 50 items originally identified in SCRE 19, only six are currently open. These will be resolved through ongoing analyses using current design criteria and thus, like the other SCRE concerns, initial evaluation of the nonreportability of the original conditions will not be verified.
To ensure all changes in seismic criteria and additional stresses are incorporated into the final plant configuration, the floor accelerations have been recalculated, and the structures have been reevaluated. Reevaluation of all piping systems, preparation of Seismic Qualification Review Team (SQRT) documentation involving review of all equipment seismic qualification, and a pump and valve operability review are tasks now in progress.
In conclusion, Consumers Power has decided to classify the subject SCREs as potentially reportable because systems have been changed and equipment has been replaced for reasons which a subject SCRE may have contributed to, and the concerns will not be analyzed to the original design. Since all required changes as documented in the SCREs have been incorporated into the latest calculations, the final plant design is assured to meet current design criteria and commitment to safety.
As can be seen from Attachment 1, each of the items was discovered through a design review process. The specific discrepancies identified are random and isolated. The review processes have provided a comprehensive look at the civil / structural design area. The review results have caused an increased awareness of design packaging and individual design detail necessary to produce acceptable design.
It is felt that the past intensive overall reviews, in combination with our current Project Engineering design practices required by Engineering Department Procedures, MPQAD monitors and audits, and CPCo Engineering design overview provide an appropriate overall design review system. No additional specific corrective action is required. This is the OCO284-0041A-MP01
'f;
~
3 84-04 #1 Serial 28026 c
e s
i final report on this potentia.11y reportable situation.s If-significant discrepancies are detected during the review programs, appropriate notification in accordance with 10CFR50.55(e) will be mace.
JWC/PWJ/lr 7
CC: Document Control Desk, USNRC DHood USNRC Office of FRR s
Washington, DC Bethesda, MD RJCook, NRC Resident Inspector INPO Records Center Midland Nuclear Plant s
l I
OC0284-0041A-MP01 l
l l
()
...~.c PROJECTS, ENGtNEEalNG i
e===
SAFETY CONCERN An
- No castauer--
QT,"o' 02816kEPORTABILITY EVALUATION ouiury assuaiNcE oE,iarutar PAGE 1 4.
HOW WAS CONCERN IDE m FIED, WHEN, WHERE7 TO MANAGER-MPQA
- 1. FROM:
RCBauman The issues covered by this SCRE vere identified by ORGANIZATION:
Design Pred Bechtel and Consumers Power during preparation for the April 20 NRC structural audit. Additional SCRE NO:
19 items may be identified during the audit.
FILE NO: 15 1 DATE RECEIVED: h/20/81
- 2. IS CONCERJ A PART 21?
O YES Q NO BY WHOM7
- 3. IS NRC AWARE OF THIS?
YES v NO (CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) h0M?
5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN - SYSTEM, CCMPONENT, ACTIVITY, POSSIBLE SAFETY IMPACT -
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUENTS).
During preparation for the NRC structural audit, it was established that various engineering activities relcted to plant design require additional attention to document full compliance with Project licensing and/or design criteria. These items were discussed with Bechtel on April 13 and are su=marized on the attached Bechtel prepared list which does not include ite=s covered by previous SCRE's or existing MCAR's.
In addition, certain issues raised by Consumers Power Company during the audit preparation need to be integrated (as appropriate) into the listing.
(CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) 6.
IMEDIATE REPORTABILITY EVALUATION:
7.
ORGANIZATION REPONSIBLE FOR FURTHER
- a. O REPORTABLE
- GO TO 13 EVALUATION:
- b. O PCTIENTIALLY REFORTABLE - GO TO 13 Bechtel Project Engineering c.O NOT REPORTABLE, FURTHER EVALUATION 8.
FINAL REPORTABILITY EVALUATION
- d. O NOT REPORTABLE (IF 6.c. CHECICD)
FEP0FTABLE_
NOT REPORTABLE 9
QA APPROVAL OF EVALUATION Mh/
OF BLOCKS 1 TO 7:
'^-
MANAGER - MPQA DATE 10.
JUSTIFICATION OF EVALUATION - (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS)
None of the presently identified items are deemed reportable at this time due to the lack of any indicated safety impact. In all cases, appropriate analyses vill be conducted by Bechtel to determine the actual situat. ion relative to potential impact on plant safety.
(CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) 11.
EVALUATOR'S SIGNATURE /DATE:
- 12. FINAL QA APPROVAL - MANAGER MPQA/DATE:
'^
_ _ _ r--
- 13. NRC NOTIFICATION: HOW7 DATE:
TIME:
INDIVIDUAL NOTIFIED:
REFERENCE:
e e
.. ~.
PROJECTS, ENGINEERING e==r.
i.AFETY CONCERN AN.-
i
- ~o c=raueTma-M*W8f OUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT O 7 R 1 R,RtPORTABILITY EVALUAl ION Sc"I "o:
29 QATO-O PAGE 2 4.
CONTINUED 5.
CONTINUED 10.
CONTINUED 1k. MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION:
15 ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION:
VICE PRESIDENT - PE&C
'"I' VICE PRESIDENT - MIDLAND PROJECT DIRECTOR - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & QA IRCurtis MIDLAND SITE MANAGER MADietrich SITE QA SUPERINTEND M DMTurnbull MANAGER - SAFETY & LICENSING DMBudzik MIDLAND FILE NO 15,1 TRThiruvengadam i
l 1
TODAf *5 DATE 04/20/81
- J457 P3 Artl 11e 215-02e CWSTORER m2150 OPERATOR f 20 07220 0L1 rar 215-C20 SA 11 015 07220-031/Aedit Littr/a-20-P1/rer---....--------
c DATE STOECD 04/20/01 0e57 A
e.
WIDTE 124 DEPTN 60
---t--t-----------------t---t--t-----------------t--------------------t--------t------------t-----------t----------t-------t C3 g
PRIST POSITIOS 01 List 03 N
CD F
Cn
~~
SNIP 70s
..........********2***21$
i
" Rechtel Pow &r Corporation
" 717 E. Elsambooer Iker
- Ann Arbor. RI 4P104
" ATTDs 5. Strohl f
.". 215 C00BIF.R PT 1200 Alo Te S :
C THi5 m^ *** C*PY 4"
TD SC (l' 6
'V #'
li'
~
0 IC#A.c.'id
/TCM ARE c o s/ 6 A 6 83 67 TW C t-TCit6 4a76 d 4-4*-3(
3 076 iTENS M4 Y 6 C M4(4 TD SC A. #F No, f T o,(U24 w m%gew,v{
//aa/fl CDL
%-CWrs' Cov eittker Fe LL**us %
hI)6iTtevd L Lwe en huA ce ngaoa
<:. S e v e_7 u a n Avd < r.
t
s FFFPCTUPAL AUDIT LIST CF ffERS 2
8 UI 11.10 7 P D I L D I N~.
3,
Ceneral Crist-5
o Condi-Stonif-estor/
6 3RC Inspprorriste Coer11ence tSon of ice nce Checker 7
Peoe or (mitted with FTAR Calce-or Cose1:ent Croep B
i 1RE111aEZ_Esililas_ Eca_ ____CalEnitilens_
- _____ Cent 11ernir___ la119as Risass111ea Ensinstr_ inader.
11aina._
to j
1T '
s Port 1 -
is feastal_lamitmia I
29 fe B:cic Desten 1
21 Criterie A. 5:1sete criterie 1
T.N. response erec-BC-TCP-4 to 71 Bot J.Chien W.Tsene Belas genereted tre coopertson to frequencies.
significent (shoes dip mot site spectra.
Frequencies used la FSAS) 25 (typteel for all mer mot be con-24 i
27 be11 dings) sistent.
a N
B. Desiga loeds 2
Fai r 30
~
co S.Foelber /
33
!!. Are1rsis nothod a
5.fsene C73 '34 A. Sdissic emelysts podel is beine re-MCPR 47 Cood Chenee W.Toene S. Foe 16er/ teeletoa IIs 36 I
wised to consider spectre 9.Teene 37 the tornede missile R.C.M as 3e chield and the con-39 nection of the con-40 trol toser to the 41 asin sex 111ary 42 buildine.
43
- 1. Noterial 4
1.
Posts for the Fair Soknown 9.Tsent R.C. Nee
- 1. Search la 4
procerties fill parameters progrees ! 47
- 7. An-bellt concrete
- 2. Be dettos 5
modulen pleasee 51
- 2. Time history, f The inteoretion time Fair Bot N.Tsene R.C.M as
.005 e111 l Se response erectres, internal esed ear.01 significent be seed to l 55 v
etc (general) second instead of future.
l 56
.005 recond.
(Tyric.1 l 57 for all be11dimor) 50 61
- 3. Selecties of 6
Cood 9.fsene R.C.New
' neeber of messes 62 Sheet 1 14 4/1P/81 15 8
SfPUCf0 PAL AUDIT LIST OF ITFPS 2
DURI11 APT DUILDIW" 3
General Oriel-5 Consi-Signif-metot/
4 BPC fnerprorriste compliance tion of S ca nce Checker 7
Page or (mitted eith ISAR Calco-or Cogetrant Group 9
!E3111stI_Es1141st_ 19m_
Calsslallear____
Ceta11renta _ la11ons tisansliion EasiattL. 1tadtt_
sistas__
to
- 4. Nodel responsee 7
The combinetton Good pot 5.Tseng K.C. Hee SCB approeed 6
of motions for significent 65 the.componentc 67 l
een act consir-CD GS
?
test eith the rg' $9 j
IMR.
ml 70 ttypical for all I 71 8
bellsinas) 72
~
CD i
S. soil-structor)I SCs appro**y l ?
9 The 150* eerie-The effect of 1505 Te t r sienificent 9.Tsens R.C.u se g
calcelettoms 7
interactieg tion in soll proper-eeristion la the if SAP ties is eleo iden-the sol 1 properties change not la progresa l 77 tified by CPCo en$
ses not concidered finplemented)
TS o
is addressed in 79 SCRE 9.
SCRE 9 to a
else addresses 01 modifientions of 52 building res-83
)
ponse spectra.
84 e
ftypical for all l SS Feildings) l 88 3
- 6. Hydrodyneele to Fot censidered la Poor tot T.Lakshol/
Cm;teletions 8
cffect of spent seismic enelysis, significant D.Reemason in progress 90 3
fme1 pool 9,1 6e. Feel pool ee11sl 10 Seismic effects not Loads not combined Poor Calculations T.Lakebe1/
- 5. Peri /
Calcolettone 9
I completely accounted in accor$ence olth need to be D.Magnuson N.fsso/
in progress l 95 9
cad floors M
for in design.
Section 3 8.6 3.
redcne K.Les 96 51osh height not 97 calculated eelle 90
)
ani elab appear 99 to be designed 103 s *
)
for temperature 101 effects only.
102 Other loads not 103
)
considered in 104
(
combinetton.
10$
)
- 7. Desponse spectre 11 Cood 100 e
(specific) 109
)
)
Sheet 2 14
)
t/10/81 15 m
r4
- 2 FTEurf0P8L AUDIT LIST OF ITEP.S m
1 8pI111 APT BUILDIEC 3 -
CD 5
Ceneral Ottel-Condi-Stonif-notor/
5 ppC Insperopriete comp 11ence tion of icence Checker 7.
- Fece or omitted with FS8P Calcu-or cognizant Croep e
&RE111atI_It1111Rs_ lea _
Entcula119er....
Cett11ernis___ lattens 21anos111em Easinter_ lasist
__11 tina 10 S. Vertical 1% Fl oor flezibility FSAP does not Fair Stedy to B.T se n g Bone Battles for 11 eneltsin ses not included in address floor progress piping 113 the enicolettene.
flenibility.
response 11a 1 typical for all 115 buildingst 116 4
es B. Stress ene17 sis 12 A superseded sels-Fair Ret slemi-Celeslettoep 1
sie snelysis ses ficant la progress 12 used for design.
121
. Sheer sells and 12 The toedine com-Fair B ot stoet-J.Ross/
P.Rese-Jeettfiestion floors blnetion including ficent pathr/
beine pre-123 tornado sind een T.Verne/
pared.
126 not checked.
K. Lee 127
- 1. The dess load in-311 the load com-Fair got sient-T. Terne /
P.Rege-Calcolettees 1
.Feendationa]et creased af ter the b1nettons specified ficant Letshei pathr/
scheduled l 131
, analysis ses con-la the FS AR K. tem 132 pleted.
have not been 133 checked.
134
- 2. The to:Jine 135 combinetton 1 36 inclodine tor-137 todo old ses 130 not checked.
139 Ce Joint filter 18 NA NA J. p oss 142 between buildings 143 93 Competer verifi-16 Terification has not so FS89 consit-Not signi-Terificetten 1
Feen completed for ment.
ficant beine decel-1 neecret programs.
oped.
I t'
~
(typical for all l 1es buildingst l 150 s-I Ee Overe11 stability 18 Cood D.Meenesom Lak ehel Celes1stlos 15 approsed.
154 J
)
x Sheet 3 14 e/18/81 15 Y
FTOUC70B AL BUDIT LIST OF ITEMS 2
PUI11] ART PUILDING c=>
3 e
rs)
CD 5
ceneral Oriel-b Condi-Siemif-motor /
8 Spc
!asppropriate compliance tion of scence Checker cy) 7 a
Peee or cettted eith TSAR Celes-or Cocaisant Creep 8
_&E3111 err asiltian_ Ina_
Cal;ultilens Cetallatsis___ la11eas Risons111as Insianer_ Laatar_
11alsa__
to CF.Icterectieswith7}
20 Aus111ery building See, as celes-sot celesle-J. Rosa Lekshel Tachine 157 Coe-Cotesory I enicolettoes do est la tions colusn ese11-tions neces-be11 dies 150 ctracteres inclode interecf ton able sers to shoe calcolettees 1
'i with torbane bs 11-that terbine to be fleel-1 l
gg-ine durine termods buildine 1 sed.
141 i
and seismic eser.ts.
e111 not 152 forbine buildine desese aus-163 g
seismic analysis 111ery 1st and tornado celes-building.
165 166 lations to be g
16' fe' finallred.
\\'
dC Totaedo ates11es h 21 D.Regnoson Lekshm1 Calcoletions l1 complete l 171 174 III. Ceaformance to 23 g
175 Staff's Criterie 176
)
(Dest ations) 179 Part II -
ico Est_Danissa A. laterior sheer 2e
- 1. Wells were not Tetr This e111 J. Boss F.Rees-Calcolettone 1
sells designed for probably not pathy /
ta progress.
1 pinte bending for be critical T.Teree/
1st g
seireic and tor-to destem R. Lee 185 nodo loads.
but calce-105 lations need 107 g
- 2. Consider thermal to be sede 100 gradient in to check this.
139 190 design g
I 5 I terior sheer 25 Fleserei desten Missimo load coa-Poor Calculations J. Rose B.Tseo/
Calceletions B
sells considerr. only ces-binetton pressure Diff1-need to be M.Re11er/ in progress 19's_
h L-portment presari-plus setemic cult to mede includ-K. Lee 195 ration. Feirate follow ano seismic 196 load was not in-effects on 197 g
wells. ftrans-19e claded.
199 eerse bendine) h C. Rain floors and 26 Poef not chected Fair Not signi-D.Meensson K.Les/
Calculettees 2
roofs for uplift during ficant J*.Arore in progress l 20 4'
20e tornedo g
D a
Sheet a 14 I
e/18/81 15
e STRUCTURAL' AUDIT LIST OF ITFRS 2
C AUXILIppt PUILCING 3
N CD General criot-5 Condi-Stonit-net sr/
6 i
BPC Inerrrortle'*
Compliance tion of icence Checker 7
i
" ~ ~
Face or Deltted with FSAP Calce-or Cognizant Croep f
i 133111an_Is11 dias _ Ene_ ____Cs1Cula119er____
Ceteilernis__ latisms Disaszillem Inniasst_ 1railtt_
_Ela t u s _ _.
10
. 7tructural steel 2P Cenere11r deelemet All the load Fair Probably not D.Regnoson K.Lem/
Jeetification brccing for deel load and eortinettons significent J.Arora beise pre-200 live loads only.
civen in the FEAR pared.
209 have not been 210 c o n r:1 d e r e d.
I 211 E. Foemdetion met 20 Teir
- v. Terme f.Yoree/
214 P.Reve-2 15 pathy /
216 r.Lem 217 l
A F.-Mais frece concrete' M4 NA 200 (f
- g
-c lema destem 221 t
84 Seconderr floors 31 Some e s sein 224 floorr.
225
- 3 _
N. Floor-sell 32 J.Ross 220
'i 1:nctien dete11s 229 I. Dyrer'; effects of 33 Not signifi-232 occhinery cent fspeeds 233 higher then 234 30 Hz) 235 Added itees not
- 1. Probable menires Probable senteen Fair Not signi-D.Magnoson D.Reeseson/
237 coeered in sedit flood elevation flood eleva tion ficant f.La k s he t 230 of 632', instead of 632' instead 635.5 1s 239 of 635 5' of elevation save tenep 240 635.5' een used 241 in the snelysis 242 and desion.
l 243
(,
Sheet 5 14 1
.g 4/18/81 15
)
h
d Sf p OCTith A l AUDIT LIST OF ITERS CD 2e7 FFFTICF b2TER PUMT 575DCTUFF N
240 m
Cenerel Origi-250' I
Condi-Signif-motor /
G 251 RPC Insprrepriate rompilence tion of icence Checker 282 Service Water Peae or 0*19ted with FTAP Calre-or cognirent Croup 253 Isea_31 Insists fez _ ____Calcula11 ens ____
Cgge11ttola lasiens Disnesilien Etninett_
lanter 11stus__
255 s
P;rt I -
2 50 isastal_laaltata 259 I. Seric Design 1
261 Criterie 262 A. 5 1 sele criterie 1
Fair J. chela /
S.5ebkoe-264 P.Fejeve
. ski /
265 C.Teveson 268
- 3. De 1ga leeds 2 Tornado wind 300 eph tornado Fai r Redo tor-D.Crif fith/ R.Rekin/
Tornede re-l 26 l
b speed of 300 mph wind used instead nado enely-L.Ho P.Coffes/ emelysis 270 used to check of 360 mph sind.
sis P. Shen complete l 271 mise 11e local 272 effects.
273 IIe Ame3ysis Method a
276 A. S;1 sole emetysie 4
Fefer to anz Fair l 273 f
1.' Reterial prop-4
- 1. Concrete modules Not sient-J.Chien Comelder la l 29
( orties (F ) bared on ficent current efforts f'c = 3,000 psi l 283 instead of speel-20e fled concrete 285 strenath of f*c =
286 e,000 psi.
207
- 2. Analysis did not 209 consider fill.
l 290
- 2. Tlea hjstory, 6 Pefer to aux l 293 (
restosse spectrum, i 294 etc (generel) l 295
- 3. Selection of 6
Cood l 290 member of messes l 299
- 4. Model responses 7 Pafer to anz Fair l 302 N
1
, - +
g Sheet 6 1e Et s/18/81 15 1
e
+
~g
A A
5-STROCf9 Fat 85D1T LIST OF ITFRS 247 SEPTICE WATER PURP STPUCTURE 240 CD tQ Ceneral Oriel-cn 250 Condi-
$1emif-estor/
251 ppC Inaprrocriete Compliance tion of icer<a Checker 252 C
5 r -! ce ?-;ter Page or coitted with FSAP Celes-or Cosetzent Croep 253 11 h L !K1RKt Eta.
CALC 915119tt____
C9tt115tBLE lat19EE E1ERSE111SE h2SittBE._
Leadit.
_ Tittiga ---
255
..p -
5.
TJrodymesic 8
- 1. Nydrodymesse e-
, cot Probably not cersteer l 305
- p ces effects are moV signif ica nt la corrent l 306 co n sid e r e d.
offorte l 307 m_
- 2. Torsional effect
-)
l 309 of combinations
~
l 310 of boys filles or l 311 i
empty should t>e l 312
~,. Y considered.
l 313 r
4.
e spectre 9
[hr F.Rais/
Bev analyste 3
s K. Nee /
sot beges.
317 L
~1c) l+
C.Teveson 318 c-l 321
- ense in t-
- p*g '
t!
324 1*e e
%,-e 325 m., 5.: w 328 s.
/Gjb3.a N PN1y met"D.Crif fith/ T. Ele /
Coesider l 330 f _ + ~ e,
~
tr w
. r a. --
=i in ;,
es, c:
- * *. c significant L.Mo P.Perikh/ 1s corres,t l 331
- t. >- o
~,
. r, R.Reere offorte l 332 (P.shes) l 333
,le 3 g,.
g 33g l 335
,1.
!a.dios l 336
?.7. -
-;. r i r.. t vm l 337 y
2,_,,.,.
u -
l 330
. - n.;..
- u
'd 1.- -
1, 341 342
,y. * %- e r,
.:sw
~
7cc D.Crtffith/ Y. Ele /
l 345
- 3. Do g,
e5
<.J
'91 L.No P.Pertkh/
l 344
' " W ~@"
N.Reera/
l 347
~
(P. Shen) l 340 q
3
,' 2
..%o t
aod 8.Mozefori 351
,?. ;;oc,
-+
352 r
a e.!. t >
s r > ? c t. t e
., ow ~
s Incom-D.Criff1th/ T.Kim/
l 355 s~ e, crecil!
'+-
ple te, L.Ho P.Perikh/
l 356
'r. ;,-
fair
(.P. Shen) l 357 e
i
'N Sheet 7 14 4/19/81 15 y
- /
O EfPUCTUhAL AUDIT IIST OF ITEMS 247 ;
l SFPTIrF H TTP FUPI STRUCTURE CD 240 CD Ceneral Origi-250 Condi-Signif-setor/
251 NFC Insprrottlete roe pli a nce tion of icence Checker 252 Service Water Paee or cettted with FF7P Celes-or Cognizant Croup 253 Enas_111ttista Ica_ __ Cal ulallens____
Cesn11 tents la11ena Rinnesilisa Ensintat_
Landet Ittina._
255
{ E.Interactioneith 19 Calculatione have notFSAP work not so cel-P re11eine rr P. Shen /
perfore selseic nee-Category I been located for the completes cele-stedt shows D.Cr1ffith eeelyste on l 36 Ctructores interaction of the tion no probles.
circulettog l 36 circulatino unter showing meter strec-3 jnteke structure the in-tore eed 364 with SWPS.
teraction check of 345 stractere 366 Port II
_E 1.9331333 381 f
(
A. Enterior sheer sells 1
- 1. Loads from Me t h od Th e regelred load Probably not D.Crt f fit h/ 3.Rer1/
Comelder la l 37 I reisele snely-coobinettons in significant J.Cobster/ P.Perikh/ correst efforte sir not censider-the FSAR have not L.Ho R.Reere l 373 ed in $esign.
ell been checked.
( P. S h e m) l 374
- 2. North end scath l 376 salle not checked l 377 for tornado losis.
l 379
- 3. Teeperature ered-l 380 feet scorss wells l 301
- 3. I.terior sheer sells 22 Refer to A l 304 C. N;te floors and 23 Refer to A l 307 D. Fooede tien se t 24 nefer to A l 399 E. Fleor-watt joint 25 Refer to A l 393 datells l 394 F. 321esic,restreint of 26 397 (
4 props l 398
- 1. Teok s certion 3.P Cood Reo/Dessi Diesel oil Cooplete 400 tasks Beo/
401 A.Bendo-402 podhyere 403 Presseri-404 i
ration 405 tenks 406 T.Petenker/
407 C.Dirnbemer 400 Sheet 8 1e e/IP/81 15
e Sf90LTUPAL AUDIT LIST OF ITFRS 247-FrRTICE WATER PURP ST60Cf0PE 243 General Oriel-250 Condi-Signif-motor /
251 3RC Inerrrorrista Compliance tion of icence Checker 252 Service Seter Peee nr Coltted with FSAM Celes-or Coestrant Group 253 fata 11ERCLELS E2s_
._E41C91E11SDE C9151191915 1411983 D1399311198 ERRiatst_
113421.
_Eita t ma _ __
255 '
- 2. Pipite Section 3.3 Yeador peo/Deeel 411 celes-412 O
latica 413 for N
414 pipes CD 415 Cood 4 16
- 3. Selseic Amelysis 419
- 1. Tanks The stress rennery Teodor /
C.Otel Ce back to l e~
for the diesel oil Cood vender.
l 4:s.
b tanks is incomplete.
l 423
~
Presseres not l 424
.17 cses are elven 425 e.ta fact. 3.9-tas 0
8".1, Sheet 5
5.
427 vertical earth-New 42,8 O
esame not con-42 sidered for diesel 430 i
oil storece tank 431 design.
432 l
- 2. Papine Flesibility of pipe Fair D. Beeves W.fseng/
peelse calce-(concrete) heads was not con-free C.Tevesos lations.
l 434 sidered ja the
!! eld 437 enelysis.
Fere-only.
4 3p seters in snely-439 sia nees to be re-440 vised F for pipe 441 and rhear wave 442 g
velocity.
er C. Strectoral asely::!s 446 (
- 1. Teoks Good Yeodor 440 celes-449 1ations 450 g
- 2. Pipine P1ssile tapact Good sot sient-Roo/Dessi Vendor Update for l 452 (cone) ee s const.1e red cent calcule-concrete pipe.
l
-for the rteel tions/peo 4 S4 ri pe ens not 455 ecacrete rira.
456 c
Sheet 9 14 g
6 4/1P/81 15 O
e Tfp0CTUPAL AUDIT LIST OF ITERS 247
!FPTICE WA1FR FDPP STPUCTUPE 248' o
CD Ceneral Origi-280*
o Condi-Stonit-entor/
251-WPC Inspprorriste Compliance tion of icence Checker 252 0
5;rvice Weter Face or emitted with FTSR Calco-or Cognirent Croep 253 r ltalallenE.__
Cettlittnis la11ena 21amea111st tesistaE.
Letter.
__Statsa__
255 Isaa_sitsEinut gnu a
c[D. Soil Settlement 459 460
( Pipes 0
-[1. Diflerential Pot compidered.
Deelse design.
483 (seppoctmovese D
466
. Seismic settle-Not considered.
467 sent O
4 '.
^.
Connections to Not considered.
47f atractures D
474 Effects of non Not considered.
4 F5 Category I O
1'1"
. Desese to pipine BA for concrete Seinsic 479 due to differentie Categorr I pipe.
Coe-400 9
crete pipes are 40' away set settlement from the structure end 482 buried in natural soil.
tes 9
406 Port 17 - 11 tat _E91 4e7 o Entaist_la_2nesiteaa tse EALEk_Ennult.ht_Iden-4s9 Riing Electrical Doct bents In revies l 491 e coedelt desten
( 492 0
O.
O O
O o
Sheet to 14 O
4/IP/81 15 l
O
e i
i l
l e
l
- rpactspat 88987 LIST bt ITE55 agg pitifL CForettop policisc
'I>
egy r.9 CJ General orget.
e,,
Ceeds-Sigolf-meter /
508 m
00 0
)
ryrepraete Coertgeere eles of SCence Checker got Dtesel Pese colete1 oge> Fe33 Calce-and Coengsent
- Cree, 403
~~
i asemannag,gggggggg.
Ite.
ftlEEL434tBC..
.Cete115tt18.
1411988 R1&&S811144 18813ea1. Lettet.
,,,3 & giga,,
see port !-
See gemarat amaing13 Ses le to:lc Destos e
Set
_ctleerta _
St2 k.bloatecriterne) e Site spectre 18 StS for facedettee Ses et meteret steeed l Set level.
Sie
- 9. Seelee leede P
Seed R. Lithe /
5.Teeeo/
Sat 0.0tel E.soe
$33 Ife Seelpote setted 4
52S 8,toteese emetrate e
g $3y C1.Betersetproper.
.rs.t.
St.
fill precorttee sere ra t e e.Little Pseed se, see is a
os.e fee fait e.t - T C M ties alcelets.se i 3, Ptee tieterre re-G Peter to aos Seed l S pa seesse sees tree.
3 S35 Cac feeeeret) 334 33 Select 3es ef neo-4 Seed S so toe of essees See Ce Bedet resse**e 1 #*fet to aos Seed l 543 p.t..t t.cs erp
- e. t..ee
, So.
Se settee. 8 Set oss seen i see eadeeSte l 550 eevere fe, 3 SSt lesse reece i SS I
of*eell l SS3 telecittee l $54 free See l SSS to t.3%9.
l $$4 s
I aw el sheet to se y
orts /si e4
CJ fireftsset aspit 1857 of Iffa5 aos
,s, str=st CleistTDs SulLDISC
'93 Ceseral Orlet*
m tot Cemet-Stestf-estar /
see SpC leerrrertlete f ee p i t e nc e time of S ce nce (bector ut D8eeel pese er felttes each Isas Calce-a nd Ceemiseet Creep fe2 I
$$388418L.85114138.
Ita.
$41581411984---
C98811stA18... 1411853 11.aass111m Esatseer laat m Itate n ese j
Feeeeese erectee t plesel pedestel Felt feedor l See seeestift l Sat t apa c t it c )
erectre de see Se3 emeelop bestreetet Set be4141eg besa spe--
See tre.
541
- 1. Tettical e*1 Felt IS Sie S. Strees emelysts
- 1. Sheer sello end Cooplete Ceed 33 f.seeee/
3S8 S13 S.Beedge.
S?3 fleete peehrepet Sie P. Shoe
$13 C3 Feeedettee 33 resplete seed sa T.peeee/
pa
$77 A.Seedre-Sig podhrere/
Sig P.5 hee
$40 C. Jelet filter be*
1e 94 34 38 38 Da Se3 S.e t ~ e.t eete,.e S. Ceeeeter eettf8ce*
to Ceeplete Coed es 3.sosegert 94 pa So?
Set 03ee
- 5. everell statt18er te Good Ogitif t J.Ceteter f.seeeet as So A.Seedge-
$92 eedhrere/
593 P. Shoe S 9eset.,e.ti-eiti 2.
St, e
3,.
ese-Catese,,a See strecteses Ce tottede eteetles 39 Defer to oestliety Ceed J.Cetetes T.semes/
3 sea De8348ee a.seedge-3 ses pedbrere/
$ G ee G9S P.Shee S ee 388. Coefereesce to 80s Steff's Craterte 6ee 49eeistSemet I
Ce3
-4 sn.et sa se eessest SS c
W geemwe y
eoe - 4
- .1 : : = c..: 7. " '. 2 5%
- 22.: R..:.: 02.:
g...
3 Q.,
b, Lbt u
.n.'
- s. & i.
1.
I' I
t I
1.
8 t
u o
s.
- s. k.i.
.t.
s.
s O
L..
3g..
.s...
3 2 :::: 1 8
1 0-1 :
i 1 191..*: 't
" 4. :f2 *:21
.i o.u w
= = E.i 1 "1.:.
2-f I
- 3' I
s.
&. s.
t I*
.t.t 2
.t'23 v3
- 2..
3
- 212
- 3
.1
.t v.
~. 8 Sa:ca g
g g
o a
I l
.a 4
v u.
L=
- e..
s u
u.
1 i
1 2
3
~
- a
- 2..
- 8..
.i.
..r Z
u
.e
.k.
2 e
t.
1 2
st.1*2 tt' t* 2 e
I g
g
-1 223 o
!$1 22 I g
i o
- t..j u
.11.:
.e J
8 t
I g
3 $.
I A
y J
X 1"
I g) 3 I.
I.
2 3
~
.g E.
1 : :
u.
o
]
t.
1':
3.g
?.
2.
88 CS El p g,'3
\\
'12s 4
a i
a a
4 i
a
_ _., _. - ~ _ _, _
e TrRUrit4 At SUDIT LIST OF ITFNS C-I 662.i CouTFI6PFNT BUILDlWC 663 g
)
,e, CD 665 e
Ceneral Oriel-Condi-Signif-motor /
CD 666 BPC Insprrorrieta roer11ence tion of icence Checker 4/17/018 - 687 Page or lettled wit h FS Ah Celes-and Cognizant Croep 669
- Contatmatal_En11tian lea.
Sticulatient--
_Ceta11eent=___ lallens Rinnss111sa Ensinter_ lasttr_
,, sis tas 670 Port 3 - General 1
674 las11ais 675 I. Seric Deeles 677 i
- 3. S;1 sele criterte 1 Pefer to ser l 890 Criteria l 681 R. De: Age leads 2
- 1. Wind and torneio Fair Not signi-Ader
.T.Selve-Calcolations l6 loads are not ficant.
pereney/
in progress. l6 addrerred.
Add cel-ene/
l 605
^
coletica C. Tem l 606 y
- 2. The 1974 FIDEL Wind and Tel/fuen p.Tehol-Celeslations j6 model has con-tornado are st1/8.Dhar to be per-l 690 sents regattino not gover-formed.
l 691 terolation end ning loeds.
l 692 progree must be l 693 verified.
l 694 Fair Not signi-5.Tehol-Ametysis to l 69 facent ski /R.Cher be reviewed. l6 II.
Analysis Nethod 702 A. Selosse===leals a
704
- 1. Noterial proper-4
- 1. Crocked section Cood Probably not Be/
Bo actica l 707 ties properties not significant G.Leh plenaed l 700 esed.
l 709
- 7. Tented concrete l 711 modeles not used l 712 L
- 2. Rethod of onely-6 Peter to sus Fair l 715 sis (time history, l
l 716 respeese spectree, 717 710 etc) 4
{ (k. Selection of nus-
- 1. Becker reentred Fair Not sient-pot redeced in ber of messes for reducine nus-ficant. Coe -
in nos cel-72 ber of hTSS pere f requen-coletions.
723 oarrep is re-cles.
Calcelations 7
quired.
In progress 72 e
Sheet te 1e e
e/19/01 15
e tragrrupat AUDIT 1157 or ITERS 682 CouTAIBMENT RUILDisc 663 e
C:f Ceneret criel-665
^,
- $58
%=
Condi-Signif-motor /
BBC Ineppropriate Compliance tion of icence Checker 4/17/011 " 667 Pese or ceitt*d wit h TS3R Celes-and Coseisent Croep CD $60 Cantainment_3 11tlas 29a Calculations ____
.Cesa11stnis _ lailena tiaansillaa Ennissar_. Laatst.,
__staten _.
sto 770
- 7. Applicability of 729 specifying on1r 730 tremeletional and 731 l
base rotettonal l 732 DDOF.
l 73S
- ~
se Nedel responses a Pater to een l 730 Soil strecture 9
- 1. Refer to mes
^
Hydrodras Good Coeld be Calceletions 7
nificant for schedeled 747 etfects of a equipment 743
+
l flooded re-l 744 feeline camel I 745 not considered.
744
- 6. 2:spense spectre 11 749 (specific) i l 752
- 7. Tcrtteel emelysis 16 Pefer to ses
. Polar creme 17
- 1. Retti-sodel Fair Probably not d1 M eith l7 8
response bor17on-significant CPCo l 156 l 757 tel ressonse l 758 change.
l 7se proorse aset be Terification 7
of this 782 asseeption 75 la proeress.
7 l 767
- 9. Berled piping te Fefer to buried l 7ep pipine v
i Be Centtineent eeneral 19 771 777 r eal ysis i
C1.'Contelament shell 19
- 1. Seirais s*rere-FSap Tables 3.0-1 Cood Tel/
K.neeng/
Calceletions l7 tion of base ser through 3.P-17 8**
D. feen B.Dhar la. progress l 77 not consi$ered contain typo-l 777 graphical errors.
Verified by l 778 l 779 11/6/e1 Daview design calculations.
Sheet 15 14 4/19/01 15
.. ~ --
e N
.842.
SIPUCTUP AL AUDIT LIST CF ITEft3 y
CONTalbMEnf PUILDIeG F53 CD 645.
Ceneral Origia Cond1-51 emit-motor /
566 DPC Insprropriate Compliance tion of Icence Checker e/17/018 667 res*
or Coltted eith fSAR Celes-and Cognizant Croep 668 Esakatement.1311tlet tea.
Calssla119tt__ _.
Centlittnis _ la119as Eisensities Eastsett. Leatar.
11a112 570
- 2. Tirine celee-Not signi-C.Roone l 703 1stion has ficant In progress 8 78 not been chect e s.
705
. F1 p El ene t tsj s.
Not etent-D.Tuen WR Jestificettee I shell does not ficant in proerees 70 l
Inclede stiff-knome.
7 99 l
messes of inter-791 t
nel structurep 792
- 4. Prisery load Bot reestred NA Probably not D. Teen 01 Calcelettoes l *.
3 elone ese not stenificant schedeled 795 checked 194
- 5. Deviations from Prabebly met D. Teen O.Tetheeki calcolettoes l7 design criterie sientficent scheduled DOS Set el sembrane coop.
stress 002 h) radial tension 803 in dose get c) ellow. reinf.
805 etress 808 i
d) ellow. effec-007 tive tendon 8 00 stresses 009
- 6. Section resultant celes-Check schedeled et Section 3 of lation to 013 ring eitder (C5f) be checked 014 ha s to be check ed.
l 015 atenmeen 20 Bed l 021 1stersels l 522 1.
Loads frce eV Calculetten.D.Choe Boles per-l 025 eere not incleted is beine formed 026 in FJutL ene17-
{
revised.
827 s1s of primary 020 chteld sell O29
- 2. Seismic load act Fair Not signift-e.Negedorn To be l 032 checked for Isr-cent addressed 533 doen eres and 8 34 I
sent==11.
335 I
Sheet 16 14 4
4/19/91 15 i
1 l
)
\\
e
!!FUCIOR8I AUDIT 1157 0F ITERS C:3 862,k CCRTPINMFuf PUILDIeC r%)
68J..
C%)
6
~~~
Ceneral Oriot-6'65 Coed 1-Sientf-motor /
CD ggg WPC Insprrorriet.
Compliance tion of icence Check e r 4/17/01t" 667 Pese or Dettted with FSAP Calce-see Coenitent Croep 640
- , Esalatassat_tsiltian Isa. ____Salsslailsne____ _ ___Sene11stnis___ lailsan Disanitima Ensinast_ Laatst_
_staina__
870
- 3. Prinstr shield Additional C.Borsk Bee calce-l 839 g.
sell loect in calculation lettese com-8 the FTAR hose atent be pleted See not teen veri-regelred.
041
),
842 fled.
53
- e. Finned toonderr Modif y model D.Choo Fatore work I 84 condition is l 346 3
3e Foendation set
- 8. Soil troperty (F) 888 Probably not Calcolettos l * * --J veristion not etenificent schedeled S
e evalented.
l 851 '"
O Ce Coopeter progree 23 A membe-of computer FSAP Subsection Terified by D.Toen/
54 ele serification progress have not 3.8.1.4.R and Ap-11/01.
T.Teene 855 been serified.
pendiz 3C do not 056 g,
list all of the 057 progreen seed for 8 54 emelyste of the 859
{)
containment.
eSe i gg De Overe11 etability 24 Seteele separation Calculations sup-8'8 Bot alent-D. Teen E.Neeng/
Calc l 863 of benement not con-portine FSap facent B.Dhar la proerese l 96 elected.
Ta ble 2.5-14 l e65 g,
cannot te loca ted.
366 bearing pressure, 367 P
I erection with 26
- 1. Interretion be-See BBC Fece 2 Bot signi-Bee calcole-0 C
non-Cotesory I tween tensen ac-ficant (se tiene coa-371.
Ctracteree core theft and interaction) plete 972 conte!neemt.
973 g,
s O
O O
dD.
}
O Sheet 17 14
()
e /1R/81 15
e CON
'582. ~
FTRUCTUF AL AUDIT LIST CF 1TEPS COPTAINPENT PPILDluC r%3 Sw3' CD
~~~
Cenerel Origi-685 ~
Condi-
$1ontf-motor /
CII f68 eFC Insprrettiste compliance tion of icence Checker t/17/01A " F67 Page or CPjfted D$th ISSG Celes-and Cognizant Croup 650 Esalaisemat_Rs11 dias 19s.
001ssla11enE___. -
Cete110tnit___ lattens finans111em EestattL_ knaatt_
__11 Lins _.
87C III. Confersence to 27 07s Deelettoes 077 079 Pert II - 1g1_R331333
. finer deelg 27
- 1. A fell calcoletter Talt Add celes-D. Teen C. Tea Calcolettone l0 for liner plate lation.
scheduled 1 002 has not been loce l 803
.r_,n...rere l S.te - ~.,
ted (Coe t
1 9
- 2. So esiculations Provide Calcolettoes 10' located for calcula tions scheduled l 000 some rene-l 009 tretions in liner.
390
- 3. (31colations are Proeide cel-T.Brozo Calce14tions 0
t=getred f or the 1stion cover scheduled 094 be?ee ender the sheet and 095 line; piste.
reference 996 staff 897 r ep or t.
090 patch deelge 31
- 1. Liner piste Fair tot signi-9e1 J.Shi/
Ceeered tr l 901 effect not con-ficant.
0.Thoeki/ by RCAR S1 l 902 eldered.
C. Ten f 903
- 2. Tangential ehest Not signi-Calcelettoes 9
her not been ficent scheduled 907 checked.
l 900
- 3. Sheer reinf orcing s
Ray be sig-Calculettone l erpeers los nificant in progrees l 9)
C. Beso elab 3e
- 1. There le n'o Poor /
Te1 Calcolettoes I9 bea ring calcels-Average in geogrene 91 tion located.
917 920
- 3. Well-bese sleb 37
!*e rhell responre Poor /
Tel J.shi/
Average J.Hink 921 jenetton 9
Sheet 10 14 e/18/81 15 a
a e
FF95CTUt4L AUDIT LIST OF TTFRS
$22 CouTAIBRENT BUILDIBC 663, '
Ceneral ottel-885 Con 61-Sientf-setor/
886 BBC 1meppropriate Coor11once tion of ice nc e Checker 4/17/818 857 Pete or cettted vlin F5Ap Celes-and Cognizest Croep 668 gentasmaamt Builtima Ana.
Calssla11enz____
Cesa11arnis _ la11eas tisassiliam Easianer_ Laatst.
__31s t aa _
67e te peebrane shear a0 The eseiseent hatch The egelpment Ret be sie-Calcelettees 9
eroe has not been hatch area has atticent la progress 92 l
eveleeted for men-not been evales-924 brane shear.
ted for membrane 927 sheer. (FSAR cy 920 929 Febsection g
3.8.1.5.1.4) 930 Fe Dee3-to-cT11mder 42 See shell response Fair Not alent-Te1 J.Sh1/
933 ficent CD I 9 34 Jenction
~
Ce Pri;ery shield at
- 1. No verification Poor Calculation D.Choe C.Tes/
937
~
eell ba se se t of reber asegener is besno J. Wink 938
$naction at jenetton.
developed.
l 9 39 b b Operatise floors 87
- 1. Selse te load wa s Fair W.Necedora/ R.R1eaetr/ Calcolettoes-l9 sees 3.Lightcap C.Taveeon in progress l 94 not onsideres.
.a
.1,-
l;;;
stifloant.
Pol:t creme sep-as
- 1. Cons 11eration of Fair Probably not 5.Negedots/ N.ElsealF/ Calculettoes 9
sa a significant D.Tuen C.Tevesos la proerees 9e ports seismic loads g, not clear.
950 Calceleti M 9,53
- 2. Clobal effect on Bot sige1ft-in progreseg $e snell is not coat 955 ricar.
- 3. Containment seve-To be re-Calcelettoes l9 ment due to pres-viewed in schedoled l 959 future.
l 989 sure and tempera.
l 961 ture has not been considered.
984 J. Seector vesset 51
- s. Stz a generato ser)r Not sifalf1-D.Chos/
N.Elgaely/ Calcelettoes l9 53
- 1. The calculation Revloe FSAR to cent.
D. Teen J.Hink scheduled l ff0 sepport for the 24*-con-state that bolte
'8' crate slet is not do not take shear eve 11oble.
l 970 sees Case by B.Necedorn K.Eamdeki/
973 L. Cooleat peep suppor t 55
- 1. Mcap 45 - anchor l 974 bolt case evel-setion.
l 975 1'
i
- t l
Sheet 19 14 4/18/81 15
!D
e SFPUCTEnAL AUDIT LIST CT ITERS 982 Costaluptpf BUILD 1sc 583 -
Ceneral Oriel-665 Cond1-Stealf-motor /
S ee '-
WPC Insppropriate Compliance tion of icence Checke r 4/17/018 867 Pese or Dettted eith Tsas Celes-and Coetisent Group 668 c 1Enla11 san ____
Cent 11etnis _ lallets timesa111ea IntiaanL Lestet
__11aita 470 Cantainment teililat Esa_
a
- 2. Snobber pyrino ro*es Probably not l 979 8
do not consider cold significant l 979 con 81tjen or as-909
{
bellt ein to pin 981 lengths.
902 l
.. sec.o.a., s.lel, 5,
Co..eter ren
,oor
...e.ederne C.C en./
cm lc._i95 sells needs addi-
- 3. Teen 8.0her lation l 986 i
tienel checking.
l 907 I
Steer steel strac-9 Seinsic loads sete SA Tel:
Not control-5.Negedore/ J.Nink/
Rede estce-9f l
t:rce not considered on es
lins Iced.
D. Teen C.Teeesen/ 1stices 991 l
i 46-all platforos.
B.Elvestr/
992 B.Dhar/
993 D. Teen 994
- 0. Post-teestoets,
$1 Welther Bechtel met
- 1. Preliminary Cood Stenift-Tel/
5.Deches/ 9erse l 997 ersten vendor calce inclode calculations cance es-
- f. Bronze B.Benoit/
C:)l 998 pressurization indicate that the knoma C.Ontnown r%)l 999 allowa*les in FSAR g gogg effects.
Subsections 3.8.1.5.1
--- l 1002 19e1 and 3.8.1.5.2 for pre-stressing tendone and C7) geg3 concrete are exceeded Calcolettee 1994 under preneure is beine 1995 conditione.
checked.
1986 1007 1999 1999
- 2. Fretensioning Bot sient-Reelse FSpa l 10 tensons stress ficant l 101?
level esceeds 101+
'~
0.7 fu fallou-1015 eble in accor-1916 Sea:e alth FSAB 1017 Subsectione 1010 3.e.1.5.1.e and 1019 3.t.1.5.2.7) et 1920 transfer.
l 1021 i
Sheet 20 14 e/18/01 15 e
I
t EffDCinRAL AUDIT LIST CF ITERS 102S POPAffD WATFR STOF ACF T4f r 1 C,26 e
g Generel Oriel-9.028 Condi-Signif-motor /
1029 BFC Tnerrregritte roop11ence tion of Scance Checker 1030 Bereted Water P op or omitted eith 1988 Celes-and
.Cogairent Croup 1931 g
ftgInse.Imal._--
tea. ____Calculallans____
_Cettiittnia___ la11eas Disnesilien Essinaan laattt.
__11<a__
103
, Port 1 - hettal_!aalt-Yes Cood peo/Desai Rao/
Complete 1837 l
Elg A. Bando-1938 l'
peehrere/
1039 C. Udosi 10e0 db
- 3. Peele Design Criter-1 1942 M
se 1043 E. Seisele destge cri-1 None McConnet/
Benby/
l 1946 terie Rozeferi/
Demmelly/
l 1P g
1 10e9 105o o
~
1851 l
B. Design leads 2
Cood Beo/Deset peo/Bando/ Ccaplete 1954 gy Daogi 1955 TRL 3-17 o
1056 II. Analyris pethod a
1059 (A. Se'isolc smalysis a Dyneele snelysis Tank felt Ots1 l 1C61
~
ses performed using Found ation good.
Pierce Benby/ Dom-CD 1062 T10-7024 techniquer.
me11F/Neeng its3
- 1. Noterial proper ~
4
- 1. soil stree-Not sient-Calce la l 1066 ties tore interac-ficant progress l 1C67
'8**
O
- 2. Sheer modules, 1069 suterade reac-1070
'8*********'8*'
O cerebilities of soll were taken t...-
O and snarrrosed 1015 calculations.
1016
- 2. flee history, re-6 Not Performed N/A N/A N/A N/A 1C79 sponse spectrea, 1000 0
- I'***'*II
- 3. Selection of men-6 Pased on TIP-7024 Tank - no Otel B/A l 1994 ber of nesses Pierce N/A l 1085 g,
C. Rosel terponse 7 W/A F/A N/A N/A N/A 1000 V
Sheet 21 14 e/18/81 15
8 ST90CTUDAL AUDIT LIST OF ITERS
'1025-
'ECRATED WATER STOPAGE TABF 102t-f 3
Ceneral oriel-
- 1929, O
Cond1-Steelf-estor/
1029 DPC foergropriate Compliance tion of icence Checker 1930 g
hereted Beter Pese or omittes alth TSBS Celes-and Cogelseet creep 1931
- _SitKatt.Isen Eta _
Calcula11tna Cett11stata __ latiens Rianss111st Easiaset_ Laatst_
_11 stem 103 i
g
- 5. Soll structure 9 Fefer to een 5/4 5/A B/A l'1991
{.
se seseeeee spectre 11 seedr/ne-Ceeplete tote Consel 1995 3
(ooecific) f
- 7. Vertical seteele 15 Test - operse Otel Beedy/Be-Ceeplete 1990 Coseel 1099 8
Foundettoo - good Pierce paedr/Rc-Complete 1100 f
g Consel 1101 i
O 1 1.. j
.. Stre-emelr.ie O
1* Steel task 12 Teodor Seeign fee Cood Rao/ Dees!
Toader Ceeplete l 1994 I
1199
.. M edeties 13 Cood Roo/Dese1 Seedy /
Complete
~ 1110 Udoel/Ree CD O
BJ 1113 C. Jetet filler be-14 p/A m
1114 g
teeen structoree G l 1917
- 9. Ceepeter verifice-16 1110 3
ties E. Store 11 stabiller is Good Roo/Desen Beedy/
Complete l 1121 Udog1/See 1122 3
1125 F. 7;terection eith 2n 1126 O
es-Cotegory I 1127 otsectores 1130 3 C. Torsede eles11es 21 113. %
III. Conferoewe to 23 113e O,St;ff*e Criterte (De-1135 c13tione) 113e O part II - Ear _tesises Cood peo/Dessi Vendor /
Complete l 1940 Ae Steel task peo 1141 g
Cood Peo/ Deest po'ady/
Complete l 1143 S. Feendettee Udog1/Roo tiet 9
O Sheet 22 16 O
e/1p/81 15
,O
STPSCFBBAL A0017 LIST OF IftpS 1923 POPATED WATER STODACE TABE 1028
}
197h
'e Genere!'
Oriel-3 Condi-
$1onif-seter/
1929 BPC Inertrotriste Compliance tion of icence Checker 1930'
}
Dereted Water Pese or Detttes with ISAR Celes-and Coseirent Creep 1931 Itatass_1ask 121. _ _Caltsla11sar____
-Ceee11stnia _ la11ess tisansities Esalamat. 1 saint.
__staten 1es 1147 3 port III - ass 1111sa:
ties tian_at_Itemesad_ta:
O 1149 I
gagg
)
- 4. Ef fects.ef thrs 26 m
1152 1153 ct;cks O
1156 I
- 3. Test Precedere to 26 1157 Eveleste Settlement 115P ^
Q Fffects 11st ~
port IV - Itass_It1 11s2 g Entstai_1a_9sta11ena 11s3 2ast_1&ssit_na_lasa-11ee 111194 O
D o
O D
3 3
3 3
t Sheet 23 to e/181/01 15
~
E 102)
- fPUCTUpal SODIT 1157 0F ITERS 102,6' tc5stID Wstfe Stop4CE 7per
{) -
,e t
Cenerel criel-1924 '
- f ()
Condi-Sigatf-actor /
192s
- ppC Inarrrorriste.
Compliance tion of iconce Checker 1939.*
DereteC seter Faee or Coltte$
wit h F539 Celes-and Cove 13ent Croep 1931
^ () ____Iteame0_Iank tea. ____Esiculatten:
_ Cees 11eenia.__ lattens 21sses111em Eastmast. Inadar_
__Itates -
103
(
1187 j [) pefrs e 1169 ess Calceletion 023 overturnine end slidino F.F. check.
1979
- [) sos Calcolettee 0248 battress access shaft 1171 888 Calculetten 025 feedester isolation valse chester 1172 8*8 Calcolettes 025 containment shell and bene slab emelysin (FIREL) 1973
{
808 Calcoletten 027 containment emetysis for eatssic loadine (asps 01
- {)
Celculettee 056 combinetten of 026 and 027 to develop FSan Tables 2.e-1 and 3.e-17 (f or addittenel relsweet calcelettees 11 ses l
t 1975 see BBC pese 2) si?S,_;
toes
- c) 8 e 8 (Fee primary shield well calcolettoes D148 see spc pese ee)(for seconderr shield sell calculations 033, 034 A, and 0358 11-
~
11 see ppc pee, 57) e33 Calcolation 04, One f oendet tee met reinf orcement desten (for additional relevant calcolettone see anC peee 19 calcolettes 026
- ()
1100 e nd 027) 1101 I
es0S (for 02e4 eee spC pese 2) c:3 1982 I ()
esas Calcolets** 046, 050, and 055 rs) 1183 esos Onestion 58, 053, and SC stee
?
esos calcolettes 09 - ese1peemt notch reinforcement desten gg3 ites esos 3eeler calculottees for steel egeipment hatch 7220-509-17, 1220-50B-10 1196
- {) esos Calcoletten 04 a nd fee foundottre ?st reinforcement design esos Calceletion 010 nell reinforcenest (se+ DFC pages 19 and 21 for calcolettens 04, 044 026, 027, and 056) cr3 11e7 ties 88'8 (for other relevent calcoletins 010, 02s, e21, enf 0.6 see s9C peces 2, 19, 24, 21, 34, and 373
, ()
1189 es0s Calcoletten 01e1 1190 esos C61colettes 01em 1991 Calculotten 017D, 017F-1, C10C, 01ec-1 streeteret steel, concrete, steel piste end oraties ess8 ess8 Calcolettees 056, 05-Ce concrete, reinforcement trecent) st rders, breckets, concrete, and reinf. at bracket 1ecettoes 1192
()
1993 4
8238 Calcolettee 012 fold) 01ee-e taew) 023P-13 Diet 119e esas to,er seppert Colcoletion 012 1195
' ()
88*8 Calcoletten 0128 opper 1steret serport Calculatins 042 stress sensory-seed condition feesponente ti9e esc 8 Calculettene 013-etCFDC) 033, 03e A, 0554-eced conditten.
1197 of seebbers, seppert eachor bolta, rear brackets, tubino, res.)
esos Calcolettens 033, 03eA, and 035a sell reinforcement and dete11s-poor condition stee
()
48es Calcoletions 0125, 0 61, 065, 31pF-1 0138-5 through 013F-23, 013F-24, 037, Oda, 020C-2 press-strectural steel, f ee 1
sepperta etc, core flocd surport, espe restraint, jet barriers, missile shields-feir 12.v '"
. 8308 Calcolettee 95, 06e pest tensionine desten end impet roor.
Intrco calceletions 7220-C2-49, 7220-r7-50, and 7220-C2-54-eeed.
()
l 1202 sees Calcoletion 07, 07e battrean reinfercement sessen O
)
4D C)
Sheet 2e 14
()
e/19/01 15 C) 1
-