ML20091M383
| ML20091M383 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200003 |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1995 |
| From: | WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19330G247 | List: |
| References | |
| PXS-T2R-014, PXS-T2R-14, NUDOCS 9508300156 | |
| Download: ML20091M383 (21) | |
Text
,
- ~
WEff!NGilol5E NON-PROPRIETARY CIASS 3 PXS-T2R-014 SPES-2 HOT PREOPERATIONAL TEST H-06 INADVERTENT ADS STAGE 1 ACTUATION (WITH NO ADS STAGE 4)
AP600 PROGRAM JULY 1995-a i
h I
u:ul93w.mm:tb-082395 9" 83 6
A PDR
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes and discusses the results of the SPES-2 hot preoperational test H-06, which was performed on December 18, 1993. Preoperational test 11-06 simulated an inadvertent actuation of stage 1 of the ADS, at full power conditions. The key objectives of this test were to:
Demonstrate the proper automatic actuation of components based on the setpoints described below.
Demonstrate automatic reduction of the rod bundle power by the control system to simulate reactor trip from full power, post-trip power, decay heat, and heat loss compensation.
Verify the sizing of the ADS flowpath orifices by observing that the SPES-2 primary system is depressurized in a manner similar to that expected in the AP600.
Test Description / Procedure Ilot preoperational test H-06 was performed with the facility initially operating at full pressure, and full scaled power and flow. The test was initiated by opening the ADS stage 1 isolation valve, which caused the primary system pressure to decrease, and resulted in the actuation of the reactor trip signal (R-signal) and safety injection signal (S-signal). All actuations subsequent to the opening of the ADS stage 1 isolation valve were performed automatically.
When the R-signal is actuated (PZR pressure = 1800 psia), the heater rod power is to be initially controlled to match the scaled integrated AP600 core heat output that occurs after an actual plant trip, as follows:
lleater rod power was to be maintained at 100 percent until R-signal + 5.75 seconds.
a lleater rod power was then to be reduced to 20 percent of full power and maintained until R-signal
+ 14.5 seconds.
licater rod power was then to be controlled to match core decay heat versus time plus 110 kW j
(power will not exceed 20 percent of full power)
Note that the 110 kW of power was provided to compensate for the higher than scaled SPES-2 facility heat loss.
The 110 kW of extra heater rod power for heat loss compensation was to be terminated when the ADS second stage isolation valve was opened 1
u A2193 w.non:lh4*2395
]
1
Additional actuations which were to occur when the R-signal was actuated included:
SG steam isolation valves were to close at the R-signal.
When the S-signal is actuated (PZR pressure = 1700 psia), the following actuations were to occur:
CMT CL balance line and discharge line isolation valves were to open at S-signal +2 and 8 seconds, respectively.
SG feedwater lines were to close at S-signal + 2 seconds.
RCPs were to be tripped at S-signal + 16.2 seconds.
Pressurizer internal heaters were to be turned off at the S-signal.
In addition to the S-and R-signal based actuations the following additional actuations were specified:
PZR external heaters were to be turned off when ADS Stage I was opened.
PRHR IIX discharge line isolation valve was to open on low SG narrow range level (0.15 m)
+ 45 seconds.
ADS stage 2 isolation valve was to open when the level in either CMT was 560 percent.
ADS stage 3 valve was to open when the level in either CMT was $50 percent.
One out of two ADS stage 4 isolation valves was to open when the level in either CMT was 520 percent.
CMT balance line trace heaters were to be manually turned off.
Test Initial and lloundary Conditions Table 1 provides a comparison of the specified and actual initial conditions for T:st 11-06. The initial condition values in the table were averaged over the 300 seconds preceding the test,i.e., opening of the ADS stage 1 valve. No measurements deviated from the specified tolerance su!Dciently to have had a significant effect on the test objectives.
The actual heated rod bundle power versus time is provided in the data plot 1. The sequence of events that actually occurred in the test is shown in Table 2 and event timing is compared with the specified setpoints/ times. As noted in this table, no flow through the ADS stage 4A occurred when I
the valve was opened, litis was because a blank plate was installed in place of an orifice in the ADS uA21Nme:Ib-082395 2
Stage 4 A flowpatit The ADS stage 4B flowpath was also blocked since this path was to simulate the failure of the ADS stage 4B valve. Although having no ADS stage 4 flow had an impact on the test endpoint, the key objectives of the test were still satisfied since ADS Stages 1,2 and 3 performance was observed. Although ADS Stage 4 performance could not be assessed, the ADS stage 4 for SPES-2 is ~ [
]'** times larger than scaled and was judged not to need verification prior to test S00103. ADS Stage 4 performance was assessed based on tests S00103 and S00203 prior to matrix test S00303.
Test Facility Configuration Preoperational test 11-06 was performed prior to the AP600 design changes to the ADS valve type, ADS valve opening setpoints, and deletion of the CMT PZR balance lines. Therefore, the SPES-2 facility configuration was somewhat different than that utilized in test S00303 and subsequent matrix tests. The key configuration differences for H-06, as compared to the matrix tesa described in WC AP-14309, are outlined below:
Two pressure balance lines were connected to the top of each CMT; the cold leg to CMT balance line and the PZR to CMT balance line.
The PZR to CMT balance line was routed from the top of pressurizer (actually from just upstream of the ADS valves) and Tee'd to the CMT cold leg balance line, just above each CMT. Each PZR to CMT steam balance line contained a check valve to prevent flow back to the PZR when/if ADS was actuated or if there was a PZR steam space break. The purpose of this line was to allow the CMT to drain with steam replacing the drained water when the RCPs were stopped, and if PZR level was low; independent of when the cold legs voided.
i ne cold leg to CMT balance line also contained a normally closed isolation valve that opened after the S-signal.
The size of the SPES-2 ADS stage 1 flowpath orifice was 1/395th of the two AP600 stage I globe valves each with [
l*** of flow area. (Matrix tests modeled two [
J'** flow areas).
Re size of the SPES-2 ADS stage 2 and 3 flowpath orifices were cach 1/395th of two AP600 stage 2 or 3 gate valves, each with [
l*** of flow area. (Matrix tests modeled two i
l*** flow areas for stage 2 and 3.)
The CMT level setpoints for actuating ADS-2 and 3 were 60 and 50 percent, respectfully.
(Matrix test ADS-2 and -3 setpoints were ADS-1 actuation plus 125 sec. and plus 245 sec.,
respectfully.
The SPES-2 cold leg to CMT balance lines were not orificed to match the scaled AP600 resistance. The low resistance cold leg to CMT balance lines were used in order to maximize u M193w.non:lb-082395 3
any tendency for localized steam condensation to occur at the PZR to CMT, and cold leg to CMT piping Tee; and therefore demonstrate if CMT draindown could be/would be delayed. In addition, the unorificed cold leg balance lines could drain in a more prototypic manner since no unprototypic steam water mixing at the reduced flow area of the orifice would occur. Note that the unorificed balance lines have very little effect on the CMT recirculation or draindown flow rate since most of the flow resistance is in the CMT discharge line. (These balance lines were orificed to match the AP600 scaled resistance and retested prior to matrix testing.)
The CMT-A discharge line did not require an orifice to match the scaled AP600 resistance, since the check valve apparently had a high resistance. (This check valve was replaced, an orifice installed, and the line resistance was retested prior to matrix testing.)
The accumulator injection lines both contained a 9.5 mm diameter orifice. However, based on this test these orifices were both replaced with a 4.86 mm orifice prior to matrix testing. Note that although accumulator flow rates were higher than expected in this test, this would have no major impact on the overall test results.
The heat loss compensation used in this test was 110 kW. Based on subsequent analyses the heat loss compensation was increased to 150 kW for the matrix tests.
Test Results/ Observations This section describes some key test results and provides observations comparing this test and the results of the subsequent matrix tests.
Pressurizer Pressure Plot 2 provides the pressurizer pressure (P-027P) versus time. As would be expected pressurizer pressure rapidly decreased when the ADS stage 1 valve was opened at time O seconds. This pressure decrease slowed when the primary system pressure decreased to [
l***, the pressure corresponding to the saturation temperature of the fluid in the upper plenum / hot legs. However, the conunued venting of fluid through the ADS stage 1 flowpath, combined with cold water addition by the CMTs and PRHR HX, resulted in continued steady depressurization of the primary system
(~ [
]'** average depressurization rate) reaching ~ [
l'** w'h MS sw 2 was actuated. The ADS stage 2 opening continued the primary pressure depressurization at approximately the same rate, and the primary system pressure reached [
l'** After ADS stage 3 was opened, primary pressure decreased slowly, asymptotically reaching - [
]'** (measured at the top of the PZR) at [
]*** when IRWST injection began.
1 u:\\21% non:lb-0M2395 4
9 i
i This H-06 depressurization appears less severe than the depressurization in Matrix Test S01211, where i
ADS was initiated at - 1800 psia. His is apparently due to the longer times between ADS stage 1,2 and 3 actuations in this test.
CMT Injection The CMT tank level instruments.(L_A40E and L_B40E) and discharge flow (F_A40E and F_B40E) shown in Plots 33 and 38 indicate that the CMT performance was very simi'ar in this H-06 test as compared to that observed in the matrix tests.. When the CMT cold leg balance line and discharge line l
isolation valves were opened, both CMTs operated in a recirculation mode of operation for
- [
l' 6 ' The CMTs then began to operate in a draindown mode, when the CLs began to drain
~
and steam was able to flow to the top of the CMTs through the cold leg balance lines. This similarity was expected since no steam flow from the PZR to the CMT through the PZR to CMT balance line can/will occur when the ADS is actuated. His is because the top of the pressurizer is the low i
pressure point in the primary system with ADS operating (and RCPs off).
he CMT discharge flow was decreased when accumulator flow increased, since they share a common
[
portion of the DVI line.
Accumulator Injection 1
The accumulator began to inject water at a low flowrate, into the primary system starting at
[
]*** This low injection flow rate continued until ADS-2 was opened at [
]'*',and t
flow rapidly increased to [
l'*#. Accumulator flow again increased reaching.
[
J'** when ADS-3 opened at [
]** Accumulator flow rapidly decreased at 1
[
]**# when the accumulators emptied. As noted above, this performance reflects the low injection line resistance that was installed at the time of this test; however, this would not cause a significant difference in the overall test results.
Overall Primary System Response Plot 43 illustrates the integrated ADS mass flow as measured in the catch tank by instrument channel i
IF_030P, and Plot 44 provides the ADS flowrate derived from the catch tank data. From time 0 until
- 100 sec. the ADS flowrate through the open ADS 1 flowpath was [
j'**. At this time the pressurizer rapidly filled with water (see Figure 1) and the ADS mass flow rate increased to
[
]*'
As the primary system depressurized the void fraction of the fluid at the top of the i
pressurizer increased from [
]'*# (see DP instruments DP-027P and 026P), and the ADS a flowrate decreased. During the time period from ADS-1 opening (time = 0) until the ADS-2 is opened, the ADS-1 flowrate averaged [
]'**. His mass loss is compensated for by the
[
]"' average injection flow from the CMTs during this time, the small but increasing accumulator flow, and primary fluid from voided portions of the primary system. As shown in Plot 30 discussed below, the collapsed liquid level in the heater rod region actually increased from [
]'**
uA219hnon:lt,-OR2395 5
n b
to[
]'** during this period. Note that Plot 30 shows the collapsed liquid level measured using L
DP instrument DP-000P which includes 2.43 ft. of water below the heated portion of the rod bundle (DP-005P) and 2.84 ft. of water / steam measured above the heated portion (DP-014P) which is converted to collapsed level in Plot 31.
l When ADS-2 opened at [
]'*', the ADS flow increased sharply to [
l'6' and averaged [
]'** until ADS-3 is opened. This mass loss was more than compensated by the accumulator injection and CMT injection flowrates, and the collapsed liquid level in the power channel increased to above the heated rod bundle (Plots 30 and 31). Concurrently the void fraction of the fluid near the top of the pressurizer, being discharged through the ADS, increases from [
]'^* during this time period, and the overall level in the pressurizer decreased (see Figures 1 and 2).
The opening of the ADS-3 valve at [
]'**, resulted in another increase in ADS flow rate to
[
]'**, however, the accumulator discharge flowrate again increased and maintained the water inventory in the heated rod region and upper plenum, while the collapsed level in the pressurizer increased and the void fraction of the fluid at the top of pressurizer decreased. The accumulators soon emptied at [
]'*' and the total injection flow into the primary system, decreased to
[
]'A' from the two CMTs. The decreased injection flowrate is reflected by the heated rod region collapsed liquid level, which decreased to [
J':"# ; by the lower upper plenum fluid void fraction which increased from almost [
]'6*; by the pressurizer collapsed liquid level which decreased from [
]'**; by the void fraction of the fluid at the top of the pressurizer which increase from [
l'A*; and by a sharp decrease in the ADS -
flowrate to [
]'**
)
Because the ADS-4A flowpath was inadvertently blocked no additional venting of the primary system was provided when the CMT-A level reached 20 percent at [
]'**, and injection flow from the IRWST was not immediately available. However, the CMTs continued to deliver water: with CMT-B flow decreasing from [
]'** lbs/sec at [
]'** when it emptied. CMT-A continued to deliver water until [
]'**, but did not completely empty. Both CMTs refilled slightly at [
]'*'(when there was no injection flow from the IRWST) and j
both CMTs re-empty after refilling (see Plots 33 and 38).
)
)
As shown in Plot 40, flow from the IRWST via both the two IRWST injection lines initiated at
[
]'**. The IRWST flow quickly increased to [
]"' per line which, combined with q
the CMT flow, corresponded closely with the mass being vented via the ADS-1,2,3 flowpaths. - This
{
was reflected by a small increase in the heater rod bundle collapsed liquid level. Note, however, that a steady IRWST flow rate was not established; but flow oscillated with a [
]'** period with substantial, simultaneous flow variations in both injection paths. Since the IRWST injection soon becomes the predominant source of injection to the primary system (CMT-B empties, and CMT-A f
flow is rapidly decreasing); the rod bundle collapsed level also oscillates. The same is true for the collapsed level measured in the lower upper plenum shown in Plot 30, and for the collapsed liquid u:\\2193w.non:Ib-082395 6
level in the PZR shown in Figure 1. The annular downcomer levels and hot leg levels also increased / decreased (Plots 24-27 and Plots 20 and 21 respectively) in conjunction with IRWST flow.
Both the lower upper and upper upper plenum levels and PZR level showed a marked increase following the initiation of IRWST flow, until [
.]' 6#
As shown in Plot 40, the IRWST injection flow although oscillating began to decrease at
[
l'** and essentially stopped at [
]'*'. At [
]'A' the IRWST flow is again initiated, quickly increased reaching [
]'A' peak flow through each injection line with large oscillations. Flow began to decrease at [
]'A' and again essentially stopped with subsequent oscillations from [
]'**. 4s at [
]'6* oscillating 00w began and reached peak flow rates of [
]'6' per injection line at [
j'**, and continued until the test was terminated at [
J'**.
It can be generally observed from comparing the IRWST flow versus time with Plots 30,31, and Figure I that the IRWST injected when the average collapsed liquid levels in the heater rod bundle, lower-upper plenum, and pressurizer are at their minimum level (maximum void fraction) and stopped injecting when the levels were at their maximum (minimum void fraction). This overall change in water level (void fraction) was also accompanied by shorter duration oscillations of large magnitude in measured level that have a period of [
]'6* lib &
1RWST flow oscillations. These oscillations are most apparent in the overall PZR collapsed level l
where the individual oscillations range from [
]'** of measured level ([
]'**
void fraction) change. In addition to the change in overall level and void fraction, the discharge of
[
mass from the PZR via the ADS-1,2,3 essendally stopped when IRWST flow stopped. Note that this was when the CMTs were partially refilling and at the same time providing injection flow.
The initiations and stops in IRWST flow can be seen to result from the primary system overall pressure. The observed pressure at the bottom of the power channel downcomer (P-00lP) shown in Figure 3 has been adjusted by subtracting the elevation head of water in the downcomer to obtain the l
l actual pressure at the DVI nozzle inlet to the annular downcomer. It can be seen that the IRWST began to inject at [
]'** when the primary pressure at the DVI nozzle was [
J' 6
- IRWST llow then stopped at [
]*** when the pressure increased to [
]'**, started at
[
l'** when this pressure decreased to [
l'**, stopped at [
j'6# when pressure i
increases to [
l***, and restarted at [
]'** when pressure decreases to [
]* 6 '
again.
As evidenced by the small changes in primary pre.ssure associated with initiating and stopping IRWST flow discussed above, very small primary system pressure changes would cause the IRWST 00w oscillations. The fluid temperatures in Plots 5-8 clearly show that the saturated hot leg fluid reaches the SG inlet after IRWST injection started and that some Guid reached the SG tubes. Since the SG's
(
are still very hot, this Guid was Hashed and this appears to be the source of small pressure changes.
For example, Plot 7 shows that the temperature in the lower pan of SGA tube (s) (T-A05P) decreases l
from - 450*F to - 250'F (the primary system saturation temperature) at - 2450 seconds. This time corresponds to when the first oscillation in the IRWST flow is observed.
j u:s2193w non: iso 82395 7
=
- o TABLE 1 INITIAL TEST CONDITIONS FOR PRE-OPERATIONAL TEST H-06 Parameter (Instruments)
Specified for Actual Comment Matrix Test a,b.c Rod Power (W-00P) 4910 100 kW Pressurizer Pressure (P-027P) 2241 29 psia Average HL Tempemture 602.2 9F (T-A03PO/T-A03PL/
T-B03PO/T-B03PL) i Reactor Vessel (Core) Inlet 538.019 'F Temperature (T-003P)
Core Flowrate (F_003P) 51.54 0.55 lbm/sec.
Cold Leg Flowrate 12.85 0.22 lbm/sec.
(F_A0lP/F_A02P/F_B0lP/
F B02P) i DC-UH Bypass Flowrate 0.40 0.!! lbm/sec.
(F_014P) 1 25 ft.
Pressurtzer Level (L_010P) 12.24 1
1 36 ft Accumulator Level 7.55 0
(L_A20E/L B20E)
Accumulator Water 68 1 9 *F Temperature (T-A22E/
T-B22E)
Accumulator Pressuir 711 14.5 psia (P-A20E/P-B20E) j IRWST Level (L_060E) 27.9 1,32 ft 1
i 1
l uA2193w.non:ltwo82395 8
4.
TABLE 1 (Cont.)
INITIAL TEST CONDITIONS FOR PRE OPERATIONAL TEST H 06 g
Parameter (Instruments)
'Specified for
' Actual Comment
'iL Matrix Tests a.b,c IRWST Water Temperature 6819'F i
(T-063E)
PRHR Supply Line 230.5 122.5 F Temperature (T-A82E) -
UH Average Temperature 511 9F (T-016P)
PR to CMT Balance Line 644 45 F Temperature (T A28P/
T-D28P)
CL Balance Line Temperature
> 329 F (T-A142PL/
T-B142PL)
CMT Level (L_A40E/
20.5 ft.1 1 ft 0
L B40E)
CMT Temperature 68 1 'F 9
(T-A411E/T-B41IE)
SG Level (L_A20S/L_B20S) 4.92 0.49 ft SG MFW-Temperature 4321 13#F (T-AOIStr-BOIS)
SG Pressure (P-A(MS/
711 29 psia P-BlMS) i i
I l
1 l
uA2193w.non:Ib 082395 9
TABLE 2 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR PRE OPERATIONAL TEST H-06 Event Specified Instrument Channel Actual Time (Sec.)
ADS Stage / Valve 0
Z_00lPC/Z_00lPO a,b.c Opened Reactor Trip Signal "R" P = 1800 psia P-027P MSL IV Closed R Signal Z_A(MSO/Z_ANSC Z_B04SO/Z_BMSC Rod Power Reduction R Signal + 5.7 sec.
W 00P S Signal P = 1700 psia P-027P CMT BL IV Opened S Signal Z_A45PC/Z_A45PO Z_B45PC/Z_A045PO CMT Disch. IV Opened S Signal + 8 sec.
Z_A40EC/Z-A40E0 Z_B40EC/Z-B40E0 PRHR llX IV Opened LO NR SG level +
Z_A81EC/Z_A81EO 45 sec.
MFW IV Closed S Sigmd Z_A02SO/Z_A025C Z_B02SO/Z_B025C Reactor Coolant Pumps S Signal + 16.2 sec.
DP-A00P l
DP B(X)P l
i Accumulator Delivery P-027P = 710 psia Initiation F_A20E/F_B20E ADS 2 Opened CMT Level 60%
L_B40E Z_002PC/Z_002PO Ileat Loss Compensation ADS 2 Actuation W OOP Off ADS 3 Opened CMT Level 50%
L_B40E Z_003PC/Z_003PO ADS 4 A Opened CMT Level 20%
L_B40E (Note: flowpath blocked)
Z_ANPC/Z_ANPO 1
I i
l e m 93m - w o m os to
TABLE 2 (Cont.)
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR PRE-OPERATIONAL TEST H-06 Esent Specified Instrument Channel Adual Tirne (Sec.)
IRWST Injection F_A60E/F_B60E a.b.c Start /Stop i
u:C193w. nim:lt>-0x2395 gg
TABLE 3 SPES-2 INSTALLED ORIFICES FOR TEST 11-06 Location Diameter (mm)
Thickness (mm)
ADS-1 4.99 12 ADS-2 10.79 12 ADS 3 10.79 12 I
ADS 4A blocked
- N/A ADS-4B blocked to simulate single failure N/A CMT-A injection line no onnce N/A CMT-B injection line 5.7 5.5 CMT-A cold leg bal. line (2 onf.)
no orince N/A CMT-B cold leg bal. line (2 orif.)
no onfice N/A Accumulator-A injection line 9.5 7.3 Accumulator B injection line 9.5 7.3 j
- Blank plate inadvertently installed l
l l
l l
4 u A2193wmn Ib-082395 12
y e.
s s
t i
e p
a,b,c P
b h
. i 1
l f
r i
?
t b
[
i i
1 t
i f
t i
r.
P I
e i
P
)
t, t
u A2193w.non:ll> 082395 13
j'r,
[>
. e'.
+
r 4 2 o a.b,c I
1 I
l i
1 l
i M
uA2191w non:lb 082395 y
E-t.
.p l
i..
a i
t b
a,b c P
i k
t i
P f
s t
u:\\2193w.non:lb-082305 15
~
i 5
TABLE 4 SPES 2 TEST H.06 PLOT PACKAGE CHANNEL LIST BY COMPONENT COMPONENT CHANNEL UNITS PLOT COMMENT ACCA F_A20E lbm/sec.
39 ACCA L_A20E '
ft.
34 ACCB F_B20E lbm/sec.
39 ACCB L_B20E ft.
34 ADS 1, 2, & 3 IF30ftw lbm/sec.
44 Flow rate derived from IF030P ADS 1. 2, & 3 IF030P lbm 43 Catch tank ADS 4 & SG IF40ftw lbm/sec.
44 Flow rate derived from IFG40P ADS 4 & SG IF040P lbm 43 Catch tmik ANNDC DP-A021P psi 24 To cold leg-Al ANNDC DP-A022P psi 25 To cold leg-A2 ANNDC DP-B021P psi 26 To cold leg-B1 ANNDC DP-B022P psi 27 To cold leg-B2 BREAK LINE IF05ftw lbm/sec.
44 Flow rate derived from IF005P BREAK LINE IF005P lbm 43 Catch tank CLA DP A00lP psi 24 To cold leg-Al CLA DP-A002P psi 25 To cold leg-A2 CLA DP-A09P psi 22 Pump suction CLA T-A10P
- F 11 Steam generator outlet CLAl F-A0lP lbm/sec.
36 CLA1 T-A021PL F
13 Downcomer inlet CLAl T-AllP "F
11 Pump outlet CLA2 F_A02P lbm/sec.
36 CLA2 T-A022PL F
13 Downcomer inlet CLB DP-B00lP psi 26 To cold leg-B1 CLB DP-B002P psi 27 To cold leg-B2 CLB DP-B09P psi 23 Pump suction CLB T-B10P "F
12 Stemn generator outlet CLB1 F_B0lP lbm/sec.
36 CLB1 T-B021PL "F
14 Downcomer inlet u;\\2193w.non:lb-082395 16
TABLE 4 (Cont.)
SPES-2 TEST 11-06 PLOT PACKAGE CIIANNEL LIST BY COMPONENT COMPONENT CIIANNEL UNITS PLOT COMMENT CLB1 T-B11P F
12 Pump outlet CLB2 F-B02P lbm/sec.
36 CLB2 T-B022PL
- F 14 Downcomer inlet CMTA F_A40E lbm/sec.
38 CMTA L_A40E ft.
33 CMTA T-A401E "F
15 Top (242.25 in.)
CMTA T-A403E
- F 15 216.75 in.
CMTA T-A405E F
15 191.25 in.
CMTA T-A407E F
15 165.75 in.
CMTA T-A409E F
15 140.25 in.
CMTA T-A41lE F
15 114.75 in.
CMTA T-A413E "F
15 89.25 in.
CMTA T-A415E
'F 15 63.75 in.
CMTA T-A417E "F
15 38.25 in.
CMTA T-A420E F
15 Bottom (0 in.)
CMTB F_B40E lbm/sec.
38 CMTB L_B40E ft.
33 CMTB T-B401E F
16 Top (242.25 in.)
CMTB T-B403E "F
16 216.75 in.
CMTB T-B405E "F
16 191.25 in.
CMTB T-B407E
- F 16 165.75 in.
CMTB T-B409E "F
16 140.25 in.
CMTB T-B411E F
16 114.75 in.
CMTB T-B413E F
16 89.25 in.
CMTB T-B415E "F
16 63.75 in.
CMTB T-B417E "F
16 38.25 in.
CMTB T-B420E "F
16 Bottom (0 in.)
CVCS F-001 A psi 42 DVIA T-A00E "F
13 u:\\2194.non:lt+-Ox2395 17
a TABLE 4 (Cont.)
SPES-2 TEST H-06 PLOT PACKAGE CIIANNEL LIST BY COMPONINT COMPONENT CIIANNEL UNITS PLOT COMMENT l
DVlB T-B00E
'F 14 HLA DP-ANP psi 20 IILA T-A03PL "F
5 Vertical, near power channel HLA T-A03PO F
5 Horizontal, near power channel HLA T-A N P F
5 Near steam generator inlet HLB DP-BNP psi 21 IILB T-803PL F
6 Vertical, near power channel HLB T-B03PO F
6 IIorizontal, near power channel HLB T-BNP
'F 6
Near steam generator inlet IRWST F_A60E lbm/sec.
40 IRWST F_B60E lbm/sec.
40 IRWST L_060E ft.
32 IRWST T_061E F
17 Bottom Tank j
IRWST T_062E F
17 Bottom Tube IRWST T_062EA
'F 17 Bottom Tube i
IRWST T_063E "F
17 Middle Tube IRWST T_063EA F
17 Middle Tube IRWST T_064E "F
17 Top Tube IRWST T_0ME(-3)
- F 17 Top Tuhe (average of 3)
IRWST T-06.' E(-4)
"F 17 Top Tank (average of 4)
NRHRA F-A00E psi 42 NRHRB F-B00E psi 42 PC W 00P kW l
PC-IIB LA)0P ft.
30 Heater bundle PC-HR TW018P20 F
3 Heater rod PC-HR TW018P48 F
3 Heater rod IC-HR TWO20P87 "F
3 Heater rod PC-UH T-016P "F
4 Upper head PC-UP L_AISP ft.
30 Bottom of upper plenum PC-UP L_A16P ft.
31 Top of upper plenum u:V193w.non:lb-Ok2395 18
+'
A f
TABLE 4 (Cont.)
SPES 2 TEST H 06 PLOT PACKAGE CHANNEL LIST ItY COMPONENT COMPONENT CHANNEL UNITS PLOT COMMENT i
PC-UP T-015P F
4 Upper plenum PC_UH L_017P ft.
31 Upper head PC_UP L_A14P ft.
31 Above top of the active fuel PRHR DP-A81 AE psi 29 Supply line inverted U-tube PRHR DP-A81BE psi 29 Supply line invened U-tube PRHR DP-A81E psi 28 Supply line PRHR DP-A82E psi 28 Heat exchanger PRHR DP-A83E psi 28 Return line PRHR F_A80E lbm/sec.
37 Return line PRHR T-A82E
- F 19 Inlet PRHR T-A83E "F
19 Exit PZR L_010P ft.
32 PZR P-027P psia 2
PZR-T-026P "F
18 487 in.
SGA DP-A05P psi 20 Hot side SGA DP-A06P psi 20 Hot side SGA DP-A07P psi 22 Cold side SGA DP-A08P psi 22 Cold side SGA F_A0lS lbm/sec.
41 Main SLA feed SGA F_A20A lbm/sec.
41 Secondary SLA feed SGA L_A10S ft.
35 Overall level SGA P.A(MS psia 2
Secondary system SGA T-AOIS
'F 10 MFW-A SGA T-A05P F
7 Hot side SGA T-A05S
'F 9
Hot side - riser SGA T-A06P "F
7 Hot side SGA T-A08P
F 11 Cold side SGA TW-A06S
- F 7
Hot side SGB DP BOSP psi 21 Hot side u:\\2193w.non:lN082395 19 l
e.
TABLE 4 (Cont.)
SPES-2 TFST H-06 PLOT PACKAGE CHANNEL LIST BY COMPONENT COMPONENT CHANNEL UNITS PLOT COMMENT SGB DP B06P psi 21 Hot side SGB DP-B07P psi 23 Cold side SGB DP-B08P psi 23 Cold side SGB F_BOIS lbm/sec.
41 Main SLB feed SGB F_B20A lbm/sec.
41 Secondary SLB feed SGB L_ BIOS ft.
35 Overall level SGB P-B04S psia 2
Secondary system SGB T-BOIS
- F 10 MFW-B SGB T-B05P F
8 Hot side SGB T-BOSS F
9 Hot side - riser SGB T-B06P
- F 8
Hot side SGB T-B07P
- F 8
U-tube top SGB T-B08P F
12 Cold side SGB TW-B06S F
8 Hot side SL T-020P F
18 Surge line near pressurizer TDC DP-001P psi 25,26 Top TDC DP4X)2P psi 24.25,26.27 Bottom TDC T4X)lPL
'F 13.14 Top TDC T4X)3P
'F 13,14 Bottom TSAT-PZR
- F 18 Based on P-027P UH-TSAT
-F 4
Based on P-017P u A2193w.non:ltwok2395 2()
. k" '..g'. 4 14%'.
.;g
~
- Plots 1 through 44 contain proprietary information and have been deleted..
- t :.l
. u:\\2191w.non:lN082395 21