ML20091J771

Forwards Open Const Implementation Overview Item 084 Re Verification of Quality Verification Program Activities in Module 800 E-G

ML20091J771
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/17/1984
From:	Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
SWM-114, NUDOCS 8406060181
Download: ML20091J771 (3)

Text

[,'; ff [

cM10PC QRCT f

STONE AND WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INC P.O. BOX 1963, MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 48640 thl,A PRitJCIPAL STAFF 7

d l oars 3,j,, jg.p.

/W TRP Q y OfRA DE p o.,,o.

N5M A/RA Dh*A S P (j

,. o. og 3C DRMA p,,

,,o.

gy,,,

FAO SCS 9,,,.

viA 3GA ML 7

DEAR SIRS:

I ENF Flle

/tg Twr ou.owmo a a O avvacaro. O se~v sr a arrsv.

70 DISTRIBUTION

.2L comes wes _ : ooucistas _.$$"SuYea os Eac op O== ~i~es O s iciicatio~s L

@ occu-s~rs O oves o co~ = a~ce STATUS l

PLEASE NOTE I

SENT FOR YOUR O

-a6 O

ovio O arvisio~.

O o-essio~s 1 0 ova' O co--=~r O

su--a-O a ovno as = vise =I'* */la",';a,,o,,

O aoonio~.

O co scr o~s O us.

O - o -a=~

I,, s O co--

~T.

O O sis O co~cu i~ca O ~o co -=~r O u~acernaet O susoesvio~.. ~eno m OPEN P11 ACTION YOUR ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING:

natgAsso poa: O as icatio~ O au e-ass o. ~ecessa, -ave ia's wes

poovcas'es uic o s-a s vu s ca os.

C 'sasr aviss a~o sus-n O ' ease sus-v

-rs

== ooucis'as

- c o >v.

==u a ca os o-Doocu-=~rs O== -~o. O e oa vait O ' mass actu ~ o~s co v a*c o v-s - v =a'==a ~o vou ova' o co-- ~rs.

O tease ac ~ow'ioca acc=i v o t-s -ave ia' av =>o~~o a~o evu ~mo v-

~ctos== co, o v is o -

O -e v ust v-a, v ess ~ oves a a a acce===~ce -n-vou u~on sta~o-o i

~or. usas moviss us s=outo a=, arvisio-va oocu-r~rs o o awmas rvu ~ao e rwiv-m o ve a ict me-v=e so -ve

-ust =ovi

• sto~a e IM PORTANT waests u enasma ca a t-e~r wnum ve~ noi oars eva~ twouan a on mer's asvi-ava ca=.rast

.ov se aiva~ av var re-t or s.v.sa. rat u cnast we coNssota vnt asvisio~s -aos watwour cost, The following Open CIO Item / Hold Point Notification (s) is (are) attached for your action /information:

.r197.

O8'/

l) $ f W DISTRIBUTION:

/J. E. Karr DLQuamme, CPCo (original)

NIReichel, CPCo RAWells, CPCo TJGKeppler,.NRC'j' JJHarrison, NRC BLBurgess, NRC (site) j APAmoruso (2)

Job File C.3 (2) 41984 hl KRArndt/ Chrono w/o attach 8406060181 e40517 Jg PDR ADOCK 05000329 Initiator S

PDR O

ITEM / HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION FORM Sheet 1 of 2 iTE N H LD POINT NUMBER STONE & WE75 TEX 084 CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TRACKED ACTION ITEM OVERVIEW O TRACKED INFORMATION ITEM N/74 AND ##ttEA# MANTJ.0. #0. /+507 O TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITEM O UNTRACKED ITEM REFERENCE (S)

P-1.90 QVP - Module 800 0 HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION CONDITION DETAILS l

Upon completing verification of QVP activities in Module 800 E, F,

and G, the following was discovered in addition to Item Number 081.

a.

QCIR VP-1.90-618-1-38:

Block 17 is not signed.

b.

Field Weld FW-59 is not identified on the lug attached to OHBC-34, Drawing M-618, Sheet 1(Q), Rev 17/F1, or hanger SK 618-1-509, Rev 0/B1. Therefore, QCIR VP-1.90M-618-1-59 d is not traceable to a particular lug.

c.

A DIIA fann was completed on the pipe associated with FW-38, QCIR VP-1.90 M-618-1-38 1

because there are wooden wedges driven in between the pipe and hanger 618-1-6 to move the pipe away from the hanger.

'^ '

(Continued on Sheet 2 of 2)

O yes O =>

G NO ATTACHMENTS DATE RESPONSE REQ'D.

INITIATOR /DATE Rg Q, p.n.g INITIATION APPROVED /DATE Prior to Flooding M/h% 6-/7-6/

8w 5-/7 cY

/

U RESPONSE (SEE NOTE) l (PAGE O veS NOSi O NO ATTACHMENTS

(

EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONDENT TITLE DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED DATE 13078 - POR TRACKED ACTION ITEMS ONLY. EXPLAIN CLE ARLY OR REPEMMCS ATTACHWENTS FOR:

1) C AUSE OF OSSERVfD CONOITION 2) CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEM S) PREVENTlvt ACTbON TAMEN 500-034(NL)

Item 084 Sheet 2 of 2

,e

• ~.

Condition Details (continued)

The above raises the following questions:

c-1)

Is the use of wooden wedges to achieve location in piping systems a documented, accepted practice?

c-2)

Is there any evidence available that the stress caused by the use of these wedges has been evaluated?

c-3) Under what circumstances was this support accepted by MPQAD?

c-4) At what point in time was this wedge added?

Specifically, before or after fit up?

c-5) Since this is obviously not a pemanent condition, why couldn't these wedges be removed for QVP?

Please advise CIO of your resolutions to these conditions.

500-034(NL)

. _ _ -