ML20091A927
| ML20091A927 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1976 |
| From: | Mayer L NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
| To: | Stello V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20091A928 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9105220322 | |
| Download: ML20091A927 (2) | |
Text
_
v s NucLa An nt notaionv c' nissioN voca a t Nuutivi NHCsono 1%
._.8 @'# I O d __
I 'm '
NRC DISTRlDUTION e on PART 00 DOCKET M ATERI AL
/
fuoM: Northern States Pvr Co D^'Io'o c W U -76 10: MR S ello g
Minneapolis, Hn 0*Tt "'OVLD 10-19-76 1,O Hayer i
Q t1Ytm ONotomiatoi e a oP
'NPut'oHu N V" 8 L " o' C" ' "' C ' 'V ' o A niciNAL enc L Assin t o 1 signed OcoPv
&NCLOEURt j
DE SC RIPisoN Ltr trans the following Proposed Changes to Opweators Requalification Program..... (40 cys enc 1 rec'd) l l!
t
)100y.
\\.,.
4
.m dC.U.F.,., ~., -..
PLANT HAME:
Monticello
\\
9105220322 761015 PDR ADDCK ObOOO263 8V PDR SAFETY FOR ACTION /lNFORM ATION Elglgo j n.19,76_ght.
_Mtte _(,;t,*t._ff)_
AIS.lCIE.lD ASSIGNEDAD:
a IRANCILCllIIr,
/. BRANCH _CillEF t
[/
PROJECT MANAGERt See g,Lg 4 V EROJr.CLMBAGERI LIC, ASST.
ftp LIC..._AS ST. s 7 P. COLLINS W/2 EYS FOR ACTION INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION REG rilF T SYSTEMS SAFETY
. PIANT._SYSTFm
__ __SLTLSAEETL6 llEI.NEMAN TEntscn_
LEIR0_ ANALYSIS _
MRQ_fDR I & E [L 3 SCllR0EDER 11EtiAROYA DE.HT01UalTLLER..
l'
/_ _QE19 ENGINE ER1_NG IPPOLITO
_1;HYIRQ_IECIL -
{
__IAINAS-2
/
GOSS1CK & STAFF MACCARRY KIRKWQOJ) rRi{$T i
lj[r0 CASE _
_KNICHT
_EALLARD RANALLER SillWEIL OEEMTI,tJG_Er4CTp3S__
SPARGLER
_JtARI. CSS PAwLICKI Sn;LLo i
s T Tr..TECit, j
IAME.C.LtA' NA01NdlI
_ REACTOR SAFETY OtERATING._TECR
_CAlti1LL 30yD-ROSS
/_ EISEN1RTT
_SIEPP
[/'
SitA0 llUL11AN r._ COLLINS NOVAK BAER H OUSTON._.
ROSZTOCZY
_, BtrrI.ER
__SITLANALYSIS
/[
PETEkSotL CitECK
,QRitKS
. VOL1JiER_
_..MELTZ
_ __AT 6 I BUNCI-
.HEL*tEMES SKOV110LT SALTZMAN g* _ J._C I NS ___
l' RUTRERG VMrd l
EXTEHfJ AL DISIHIDUllOfJ
/C HOL NUMilER i
2'OIiii6EW3)[;!d'N_idC. VIE UI.RIKSON(ORNJ,)
NAT 11.Dt_ _ _.___
BR00EMyElLNAT.. LAB _
l 7 TIC:.,
... IISIC: _ __
LA l'DR n-Smmgaway,a
=
_ 'Jo5 A S t.B.
CONSilLTANTS
. =...z.
RL-
- ?y NSED NORTHEMN STATES POWKM COMPANY MIN N E A Po bl e. MIN N E S OT A 58404 b
g Y
/ $ ch 1'
U p~ %.
October 15, 1976 t"
OC,U v-*'
E.I-
[I p
'~
'9s N
/
Mr Victor Stello, Director
/
Division of Operating Reactors
$3 7. -
(
U S Nuclear Regulatory Ccumission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr Stello:
10NTICELLO NUCIIAR GENERATING PIAlfr Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 Proposed Changes to Operater Requalification Program Pursuant to 10CFR50.54, the holders of the above mentioned license hereby propose changing the Operator Requislificatico.Progren.
The more significant changes are described in Attac, JA'?!toffi{o s
letter.
Revision 4 (10-15-76) incorporating hanges'isj'41so attached to this letter.
/
ban c
g js
.,b Yours very t mly,
, e
'l u
L 0 Mayer, PE V,
-5 i
l Manager of Nuclear Support Services
\\\\
LOM/ak Attachment cct J G Keppler G Charnoff Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1()583 Attnt J W roman
- ~
AlTAOf4ENT A htWIICLLLO NUCLEAR G13f. RATING PL\\hT DOCKET ?O. 50 263 PROPOSID OIAWES TO RINISION 3 (6/3/76) 0F OPERA 1DR REQtlALIFICATION PROGRAM FOR PROVISIONAL OPERATING LICENSE 10. DPR 22 OCTOIIR 15, 1976 Page 1 The general disctission has been abbreviated to specify that the preplanned lecture series and sminars are directed towards those areas where annual operator and senior operator written examinations indicate that mphasis in scope and depth of coverage is needed. The general statemmts concerning scheduling have been deleted as these requirements are specifically mentioned in later paragraphs. The second paragraph of sect.on 2.A has been changed to require a mininten of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> of on-the-job -valuation each year. This extent of evaluation is sufficient because of tne comitment to aimlator refresher training.
The following paragraph has been added to st.ction 2.A. "A minimum period of three (3) days per two year licensing period will be spent at a simulator which has the characteristics of the plant for which the senior operator or reactor operator is licensed. This refresher training will expose the individual to simulated abnormal and emergency operation conditions".
Page 2 Section 2.C. has been revised to require a minimum of 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> of preplanned lectures over each two year training period. This amount of time is suffi-cient to cover those areas requiring upgrading based on performance in the annual examination.
Page 3 Section 2.D. has been revised to require a minimtsn of 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> of seminars each year. The simulator refresher training more aptly addresses those areas discussed during the scheduled seminars and minimizes the necessity for extensive on-site seminars.
In the first paragraph, last sentence of section 2.E. it is stated that operating drills may be conducted at the facility or a suitable simulator.
In tic last paragraph of section 2.E.
it is stated that, "an oral review of an operator's performance conducted j
after a reactor startup, shutdown or emergency operation may be used as a performance evaluation in lieu of designated operating drills."
Page 4 Section 3.E. has been added which states that, "Any licensed operator or senior operator who does not attend the required simulator refresher train-ing during his two year licensing period will be administered an oral ex-amination of two or more hours duration to detemine the operator's know-ledge of normal and emergency procedures and equipment. The oral examination will be administered by a qualified licensed senior operator."
i Page 5 l
l Unchanged.
i