ML20090J989
| ML20090J989 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1984 |
| From: | Albertin R TRANSPORTATION, DEPT. OF |
| To: | Dillenbeck J TRANSPORTATION, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| A-010, A-10, NUDOCS 8405230474 | |
| Download: ML20090J989 (3) | |
Text
.
c07T : "',"'],]
3.
p.cn.
u;,..
~..... -.
DOCKETEC
[jr) I C T i'.
E '
- t. r. tz:
~~
N MEMORANDUM DATE $gptember 15, 1982 DEPARTMENT d@47RNHisl#RfWrifds V
susJact REVIEW OF SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DIERGENCY REgSE Pg 7..
g 00CHETi% & SEitvi:.
BRANCH N
R.Albertin,SpecializedTransitSection,NYSDOT,146-4[M 70 J. R. Dillenbeck, Disaster Preparedness Com:nissien At your request, I have reviewed the August 31st responses to i:ited deficiencies in the Energency Response Plan.
In addition. I have taken the liberty to review the entiro Plan and additional com enta are provided from this effort.
In evaluating these observations, please bear in mind that the amcunt of time available to me was limited. As per your request, I therefore, concentrated on my previous points of concern. Even so, it is possible my comments may be addressed in the document (but missed).
Concerning the August 31st Censultant Coments & Answera...
a
/.
- 4 Item coment bd The supplied block diagram is a major step U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS"10N in the right direction at determini Wl81T No.-
j0 effective, recognized chains cd cons.ng nand.
It does not, however, indicate lines of
' Applicant _
Staff htervenor authority among function (duty) or within IdentifiedI Received -
Rejecte8 duty command structure.
Examples include:
equal authority for Town, Police and N 2. M D State Police.
I doubt this would be a Date:
Reporter:
J--
' f practicable approach. Similarly NYSDOT
./
shown no interrelationship with the County DPW.
I would recommand an incorporation of the " Role" table into the diagram.
A 2a licrc, too the lines of authority are vague with sometimes three agencies have primary responsibility for the same duty. Also, further detail should be considered within each function.
If every individual in charge of a function can directly request aspistance from another the result could be chaos. For l
exampic, can the individual in charge of buses request ambulances for a handicapped person?
Will each function have a separate radio band?
lE j.
Other items not specifically included but to be considered...
8405230474 840223 g
,'t PDR ADOCK 05000322 e
C PDR I t..
~
3..
.^
)
Page Item coment F
f Has a comunications expert looked into the feasibility of the amount of two-way' radio communications to be required by each function?
. App A II-18 How will individus1 handicapped people be
{
accommodated? What if the phone lines are Jamed? What vehicles will be used? Who will be in charge?
p.
App A The entire bus systen remains a serious concern.
Some of the items to be resolved include: whero will the buses come from?
Who will drive?.Where will they get training?
What com:::unications will they have with headquarters? How long will it take for them and the drivers to be ready? Fueling?
Breakdowns?
I realize the decision to evacuate students home first was a local one r.ade after much thought. While it is addressed in aceae detail in the plan, Since this is the first time
}
an evacuation plan in New York State used this approach, I feel additional informat' ion could be provided to cover likely blit irregular
- experiences such as... parents not home, or inore importantly how this decision could effect evacuation times.
Regsrding the Dycaric.8etiredo...
Generally the work is execedingly thcrough aa&--- --
well documented. The issue of " acceptable" 90PQGit!C.'i ADnura itdt tytaraly addroceed nut a conpicte coments on the analysis would require i
a thornuch review of tho analysis, tha camputar nodel and the assumptions. Time did not 74 Emit this. I recommend this effort be undertaken.
The model, however, is accepted in the profession as a viable transportation tool.- Ny s
only concerns, therefore, are in traffie aestrol...
J 10j I still feel the issue of available aanpower i '-
is not sufficiently addressed.
Mi I
.[
1
's > '.
s,
- v.,
y':..-
c-g.v. -
I J
Page '
k. O.y
}
Sunciary Many of the concerns have been addressed but several key issues (described above) remain clouded. Encrge.ncy Hass Evacuation i. 4 responsibility. The authors /cousvitata.re corrwi:
very ditticult fn stating any plan
. vill have problems.
Houcver..a Lhurough feasibility analysis should be conducted for each transportation task, the interrelationship vich n* bee groups. '.caweimiu2 Luna ar.d revoorcec to'ainimizs later problems, current plan does not. have sufficient--infoca.lon available to do this The at this time.
i e.
l q
e g
f j,
1,.p-
.r.
yE.
J
- 1, r
ii
.c j
- s
\\
l
.- Q
,5 3
'4.:
g-
[#d
,I yfI..
,: tu \\
'^ *
- '. ~1.i t
.N'
..e.,%
.1
's -
- fP,T.g3..,
- . u;.ql.{.yti *.0Y.
- L.,.a 1.e.
T f
4.!Ag,rfy '
1,.,y *.
3
- i...
- l. j' ).
g 8.-
. f.
L., ' n...
l i
M'il
' k,$h.7 p.
i l,._
- i. !
~,4
%-