ML20090G829
| ML20090G829 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 11/11/1983 |
| From: | James M. Levine ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20090G822 | List: |
| References | |
| 1000.06, NUDOCS 8407250383 | |
| Download: ML20090G829 (30) | |
Text
,
e o
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Arkansas Nuclear One RECORD OF CHANGES AND REVISIONS
"- ~
1000.06A PLA!JT ADI!I
N. PROCEDURE
REV. # 12 FC #
^
- l Safety Related YES M NO O .
. - [. ) .S
, i' PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, AND REVISION CONTROL
\
1000.06 REV. 21
'D- )-,
3 c.3 ., , , ) ,, .. 3 3 , .'$
^
- PAGE REV PC# PAGE REV PC//
l PAGE REV PC// PAGE REV--PC(4 -PAGE REV PC#
1 19 19 17 2 19 20 17 3 19 21 17 4 19 22 17 5 20 23 17 6 17 24 21 7 17 25 17
~
8 19 26 17 9 17 27 17 10 19 28 17 %)b ',
nSt gs 11 19 29 17 t,b rj 13 2 17 17 y,fgp "
a0 .' t'C@'-
C' 14 17
( ,,
\S ' qi\T 1 : -
15 17 .>c[f5 gcJ.' -
cf ..
16 17 gh \N*oW - '
i q{hs -
17 17 18 17 .'.
o . .
8407250383 840717
! PDR ADOCK 05000313 F PDR I __ l I i APPROVED BY:
APPROVAL DATE
^
/y[u!<?3 m c_ ; L - [ uo REQUIRED' EFFECTIVE DATE:
(General Ma' nager) l n .:.D.:.
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
- PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PROrrnURF AMn RFVTRTnM rnMTpnr innn nA PAGE 3 nc po ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevision 4a CHANGE o^Te n i , "a, DATE 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is as follows:
1.1 Assigns responsibilities associated with review, approval and revi-sion of both safety-related and nonsafety-related procedures and work plans.
1.2 Provides guidelines to determine the safety-related classification of procedures and work plans and changes thereto.
1.3 Prescribes the administrative methods of controlling the review, ap-preval and revision of plant procedures and work plans and changes thereto, including temporary changes as defined in the Technical Specifications.
1.4 Prescribes requirements associated with periodic review of procedures.
2.0 SCOPE 2.1 The controls and requirements delineated in this procedure apply to all ANO Plant and Construction Management procedures and work plans used to control safety-related activities at the station. In addition, the controls designated herein shall be applicable to procedures deve-loped for other nonsafety-related activities, as prescribed by the General Manager.
2.2 The controls and requirements prescribed herein may also be applied, at the discretion of the Department Managers, to those procedures they designate to be written which govern nonsafety-related activi-ties.
2.3 The controls and requirements delineated in this procedure shall be applied to safety-related procedures and work plans developed by con-tractors for work at ANO as prescribed in Procedure 1000.12, " Control of Site Contractors". '
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 References Used in Developing this Procedure Include:
3.1.1 AND Technical Specifications 3.1.2 APL-TOP 1A, " Quality Assurance Manual Operations" 3.1.3 ANSI N18.7, " Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" 3.1.4 1013.02, " Control of Procedures" 3.1.5 1000.04, " Procedural Program Requirements" 3.1.6 1000.05, " Procedure Format and Content" 3.1.7 10CFR 50.59, " Changes tests and Experiments" 3;2 References to be Used in Implementing the Requirements of this Procedure NONE k v_ hw _y s- , _ ; ;_m ur, . . _ , , _,.gz
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDU3UWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
FLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PROFCDURF AMD prVT9 TOM rrMTpnf 1000 OA PAGE 7 nf 79 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevisio" , a CHANGE o^Te DATE n> <4 2 em 3.3 Related ANO Administrative Procedures Include:
3.3.1 1000.04, " Procedure Program Requirements" 3.3.2 1000.05, " Procedure Format & Content" 3.3.3 1013.02, " Control of Procedures" 3.3.4 1000.02, " Plant Safety Committee (PSC) Operation" 3.3.5 4001.01, " Construction Management Procedures Control" 3.4 Regulatory Correspondence containing URC commitments which are implemented in this procedure include:
3.4.1 Letter GCMA118212 3.4.1.1 Section 6.5.1 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Work Plans Written instructions comprising the same elements specified for plant procedures developed generally for modification, maintenance and test-ing activities anticipated to be conducted one time only. For pur-poses of clarification in this procedure, work plans and procedures shall be considered the same.
4.2 Non-Routine Maintenance and Repair Haintenance activities on systems and components which are unscheduled and corrective in nature and which can affect the performance of safety-related equipment. Such maintenance generally involves repair and/or replacement of subassemblies and/or components. Maintenance of this nature is typically delineated in Work Plans.
NOTE: For purposes of this procedure, scheduled inspections of plant equipment which may or may not involve replacement of subassem-blies and/or components and which can affect the perfermance of i
safety-related equipment shall be termed non-routine, even though
" routinely" performed. Typically these inspections involve:
4.2.1 Major disassembly and reassembly.
4.2.2 Replacement of subassemblies or ccmponents which affect the safety-related functional performance of the equipment /com-ponent as a whole, or I
4.2.3 Special plant conditions governed by the Technical Specifi-cations or operational restrictions.
4 .' 3 Intent Change 4.3.1 Involves a change in the PURPOSE of the procedure; or 4.3.2 Involves a change in the SCOPE of the procedure; or 4.3.3 Degrades the controls prescribed in Administrative Procedures, if applicable; or
. u r- . : www ;,ww -
..u.
., ,,. . i.
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDUREABORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PROFFOURF AMD RFVT9 TOM nnMTuni inno nA PAGE q np 79 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE neviSio" CHANGE
,a oare n 7:rr+ in, DATE 4.3.4 Involves a change that reduces the level of safety ensured by initial conditions.
4.3.5 Involves a change that degrades the acceptance criteria, if applicable.
4.4 Unreviewed Safety Question A change shall be deemed to involve an unreviewed safety question:
4.4.1 If the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the Safety Analysis Report may be increased, er 4.4.2 If a possibility for an accident or malfunction of a dif-ferent type than any evaluated previously in the Safety Analysis Report may be created, or 4.4.3 If the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification is reduced.
4.5 Temporary Change A change to an existing plant procedure which shall be effective for a limited period of time, not to exceed 90 days.
4.6 Revisions changes to plant procedures which involve the addition or deletion of subsections, or where procedural steps are being modified, such as might occur during the biennial review of procedures.
4.7 Permanent Changes Changes to plant procedures needed immediately, which typically are minor in nature and result in only a few procedure steps being changed.
Changes of this nature may or may not involve an Intent change.
4.8 NRC Commitment 4.8.1 A request by NRC for submittal of written information or for performing an action.
4.8.2 An action requiring implementation as a result of the issuance of a new regulation or order from NRC.
4.8.3 A statement by AP&L to NRC that an action will be or has been completed.
4.9 Regulatory Correspondence Letters, notices, bulletins, etc. issued to AP&L by the NRC and letters, reports, etc. sent to the NRC by AP&L.
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Group Supervisor 5.1.1 Independently review or insure that an independent review of procedures is conducted.
.- . . % e , s _ ^ gab,m . _._. . .c u..:;.c. .. .. a.,a..., _ _;/
t e;.i
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PROFFBURF AMD RFVT9 TOM FOMTRoi 1000 06 PAGE 4 ef 79 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevision ia CHANGE o^Te n 7 ei zio DATE 5.1.2 Review Engineering group and Quality Control group input to applicable procedures as specified in paragraphs 5.4 and 5.5.
5.1.3 Ensure that any portions of the procedure which are being added or revised to implement an NRC commitment adequately satisfy the provisions of the commitment and that the regu-latory correspondence containing the commitment being implemented is referenced by the procedure.
5.1.4 Ensure that any portions of the procedure which contain NRC commitments (as noted by a regulatory correspondence reference) are not omitted, revised or deleted without having the commit-ment maintained in the procedure.
5.2 Section Leader 5.2.1 Insure that each procedure or change thereto is indepen-dently reviewed by an individual knowledgeable in the ac-tivity to be performed.
NOTE: The Section Leader can perform this review, or this responsi-bility can be satisfied by PSC review, providing at least one member of the PSC is knowledgeable in the area being reviewed.
5.2.2 Verify that the Plant Engineering group and Quality Control group have reviewed the procedure as specified in paragraphs 5.4 and 5.5 below.
NOTE: The procedure author is responsible for obtaining both the Engineering group and QC group review when required.
This requirement does not apply to Construction Management Procedures. (Ref. Procedure 4001.01, paragraph 5.0).
5.2.3 Concur with the safety-related classification assigned to the procedure or change thereto.
A. For nonsafety-related procedures, forward to the Depart-ment Manager for his approval.
B. For safety-related procedures, forward to Document Control.
Document Control shall forward to the PSC secretary, who shall be responsible for obtaining PSC review.
5.2.4 Review applicable procedures following an unusual event as prescribed in paragraph 6.5.2.
5.2.5 Ensure that the training section is notified of procedure changes which modify the content of training and/or re-training programs.
5.2.6 Verify that any portions of the procedure which are being added or revised to implement and MRC commitment adequately satisfy the prcvisions of the commitment and that the regu-latory correspondence containing the commitment being implemented is referenced by the procedure.
5.2.7 Verify that portions of the procedure containing NRC commit-ments (as noted by a regulatory correspondence reference) have not been omitted, revised or deleted without having the commitment maintained in the procedure.
M'O~ u x w u.:.i.u.a. uu . . . _. .w a.:. .. . . .. . .. m L
o PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURUWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PROcFDifRE Ann prt1TgTnn ennTent 1onn na PAGE q nf 9q ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevision CHANGE 2n oats DATE no 2e,e3 5.3 Department Heads 5.3.1 Approve nonsafety-related procedures and changes thereto.
5.3.2 Review safety-related sectional Administrative Procedures (10XX series) and changes (i.e., f" those sections reporting
, to him) to assure compliance with APL-TOP-1A. Concurrence shall be indicated by signing the QA Program Concurrence block of Form 1000.06B or the QA Compliance line of Form 1000.06C.
5.3.3 In the event that the Department Head believes the procedure-to be safety-related, forward the procedure to the PSC secretary, who shall be responsible for ootaining PSC review.
5.3.4 Upon receipt of a Licensing Information Request (LIR) which calls for a procedure change because of an NRC commitment made in regulatory correspondence, to ensure that the person making the procedure change is aware of and adheres to the require-ments of this procedure and Procedure 1000.05 pertaining to re-ferencing and maintaining sections of procedures which contain NRC commitments.
5.N Engineer g Superintendent 5.4.1 Provide technical input to procedures as requested by the Group Supervisors.
5.4.2 Review non-routine maintenance procedures to identify inspection points and to insure that accept / reject criteria is established.
5.4.3 Develop or provide assistance ,in the development of complex, detailed inspection and repair' procedures.
5.5 Manager of Nuclear Quality Cont ol 5.5.1 Quality Control personnel shall review nonroutine maintenance and repair procedures and changes thereto which involve an intent change to add, as appropriate, additional inspection points which they may desire.
5.5.2 Review safety-related administrative procedures (1000.XX Series) and changes thereto to verify compliance with the Quality Assurance Manual (Operations), APL-TOP 1A.
5.6 Plant Safety Committee (PSC) 5.6.1 Conduct a review of safety-related procedures and changes there-to to insure that an unreviewed safety question does not exist or has not been created. Procedure 1000.02, " Plant Safety Com-mittee (PSC) Operation", prescribes the conduct of PSC reviews.
5.6.2 Recommend approval of procedures and changes thereto to the General Manager.
L
PROCEDURElWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT MANUAt SECTION:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, DPUTOTA" AAUTDAT innn nf DD. A, r.~~r nUD. C, % FD,
. a -u-~ ~v.- - su aEvisiON c.o*TE ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE CHANGE DATE e, , e - , e ,
5.7 General Manager <
5.7.1 Approve all procedures as recommended by the PSC.
5.7.2 In the event of a disagreement with the PSC that cannot be resolved, the General Manager shall take the course of ac-tion he deems to be most conservative and notify the Mana-ger of Nuclear Operations and the Safety Review Committee (SRC) Chairman of the disagreement. This notification will be provided in writing within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
5.7.3 Approve overall. station administrative procedures which may not be designated as safety related.
6.0 REQUIREMENTS 6.1 General 6.1.1 As identified in Procedure 1000.04, " Procedure Program Re-quirements", responsibility for development of new procedures and changes thereto are typically assigned to first line supervisors or other assigned individuals.
6.1.2 Group Supervisors are responsible for either preparing or delegating to appropriately qualified individuals the pre-paration of procedures in their respective areas and for independently reviewing or insuring that an independent re-view of procedures is conducted.
6.1.3 Group Supervisors are responsible for enlisting the aid of Engineering group personnel in the development of nonroutine maintenance and repair procedures, and for routing such pro-cedures and changes thereto to Engineering group personnel for identification of inspection points, as noted in para-graph 5.4 of this procedure.;
6.1.4 Group Supervisors are responsible for insuring that appro-priate procedures and changes thereto as defined in para-graph 5.5 of this procedure have been routed to the QC group for their review and input.
6.1.5 Portions of the procedure which are being added or revised to implement an NRC commitment shall adequately satisfy the pro-l visions of the commitment and the regulatory correspondence containing the commitment being implemented shall be referenced by the procedure.
6.1.6 Portions of the procedure containing NRC commitments (as noted by a regulatory correspondence referen'ce) shall not be omitted, revised or deleted without it being verified that the commit- -
ment is maintained.
6.2 Safety-Related Review and Approval Process l
6.2.1 All satety-related procedures and changes thereto which in-volve an intent change shall be reviewed by the PSC and ap-l l
proved by the General Manager prior to implementation. This j review and approval shall be documented on the Procedure /
l Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B) or the Procedure l
Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C), as appropriate.
l t
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURElWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PDAFPDPPP
~ ~ ~ ~
iVD DPUTCTAV AA"TDAT 10An of
'PAGE y mp ,o ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvision CHANGE no*1E
'DATE n,,m,,e, 6.2.2 The review and approval process is as depicted in Attachment 1.
NOTE: Procedure changes which are needed immediately and which in-volve an intent change can be processed in handwritten form, providing the handwriting is legible and not likely to be misinterpreted. Distribution of the changed procedure in accordance with normal distribution can be delayed until the procedure is retyped, incorporating the change and an approval signature obtained.
6.2.3 Standard elements involved in the review and approval pro-cess for safety-related procedures include the following.
A further discussion of each element is contained in sub-sequent paragraphs.
A. Safety-Related Classification B. Engineering Group and QC Group Input / Review NOTE: For nonroutine maintenance and repair procedures.
C. 10CFR50.59 Applicability D. Independent Technical Review E. Supervisor Review F. Quality Assurance Program Compliance NOTE: For safety-related administrative procedures.
G. PSC Review H. General Manager Approval i
6.2.4 Designation of Safety-Related Classification A. Each procedure and change thereto shall be designated as safety-related or nonsafety-related.
B. The Safety-Related Classification Sheet (Form 1000.06D) shall be used to document this evaluation for new (Re-vision 0) procedures. Revisions and changes to proce-dures shall be classified consistent with the original classification, unless the Cognizant Group Supervisor determines that Form 1000.06D should be completed.
C. This determination shall be accomplished by the proce-dure author, reviewed as part of the independent re-view, and concurred with by the Group Supervisor or Section Leader (either the Group Supervisor or Section Leader may sign for " concurrence by" on the Safety Re-lated Classification Form 1000.06D).
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDUR DWORK PLAN TITLE NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PRncenttpr AMn RFVT9 TOM rn"TRoi 1000 06 PAGE g nf 9q ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevision ,o CHANGE o^Te n 7 e s -> < e ,
DATE 6.2.5 Engineering and QC Review A. Plant Engineering personnel shall review nonroutine maintenance and repair procedures and changes thereto which involve an intent change to designate inspection points and to insure that accept / reject criteria are specified.
B. Quality Control personnel shall review nonroutine main-tenance and repair procedures and changes thereto which involve an intent change to add, as appropriate, addi-tional inspection points which they may desire.
C. The Manager Nuclear Quality Control shall review all safety-related administtative procedures (1000.XX Series) and changes thereto to insure compliance with the requirements of the AP&L Quality Assurance Program.
NOTE: These reviews, as applied to Construction Manage-ment procedures, shall be performed by the Field Construction Engineer and the Construction Quality Control Supervisors.
6.2.6 IDCFR50.59 Applicability A. The procedure author shall determine if the procedure or change thereto is of such a nature that an Unreviewed Safety Question evaluation is required. Such an assess-ment will be documented on the Procedure / Work Plan Re-quest sheet (Form 1000.06B), or Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C), as applicable, by responding to the following questions: ,
- 1. Is the procedure or change applicable to a proce-dure described in the FSAR, or NOTE: Procedure, in this context, refers to a pro-cess described in the FSAR, not simply a list-ing of procedures.
- 2. Does the procedure or change involve a test or ex-periment not described in the FSAR, or
- 3. Does the procedure or change affect compliance with the Technical Specifications.
B. If the response to any of the above three questions is YES, the procedure or change will be further evaluated to determine if it constitutes an Unreviewed Safety Question.
- 1. Such an evaluation shall be documented by respond-ing to the questions contained on the Unreviewed Safety Question Evaluation sheet (Form 1000.06E).
K4 ' ..- i h w -%. . ,_. _L 3. . . ._ m.,
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW,~ APPROVAL, ppnrrnf mr
\Vn prVTRTny en vTonr_ inno nA PAGE o np 99 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE _aEvisioN ,,DATE n , , n > < 2, CHANGE DATE
- 2. Completed Forms 1000.06E will be attached to the Procedure / Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B),
or Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C) and be reviewed as part of the independent review and concurred with by the Group Supervisor and PSC.
6.2.7 Independent Review A. Personnel assigned to conduct independent reviews of safety-rela.ted procedures and changes thereto which involve an intent change shall be appropriately quali-fied and knowledgeable in the area affected by the procedure.
NOTE:(1) Independent review can be conducted by the Group Supervisor, providing he was not the author of the procedure or change thereto, or by another appropriately qualified individual such as a first-line supervisor, an engineer, the Depart-ment Superintendent or the Department Manager.
(2) Independent review may be accomplished by the PSC, providing one mecher is knowledgeable in the specific area bei..g reviewed.
B. Independent review of procedures consists of a detailed technical review of the procedural steps and an overall review for consistency with pertinent licensing plans and regulatory guidance.
- 1. Technical review ofi the procedural steps shall be made to assure that:
- a. Component and system design limitations as I
specified in design documents, technical manuals and licensing documents are not j violated; l
l , b. The planned activity can be performed as specified; and
~
- c. Appropriate administrative requirements are satisfied.
- 2. Overall procedural review shall be made to assure compliance with miscellaneous licensing plans and regulatory guidance.
Ilmumur m-
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDUREANORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL,
_ PROrCDURF AMD PrVTFinM nnMTpnr innn nA PAGE in nf 9o ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aavision CHANGE
,o oa's DATE n> <,2 u C. Individuals assigned responsibility for conducting an independent review shall enlist the aid of other staff members as required in conducting the review.
D. Completion of this review shall be documented on the Procedure / Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B), or the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C), as appropriate.
E. Elements to be considered in conducting an independent review are as indicated on Attachment 2. The Cognizant Group Supervisor shall, at his discretion, require this review to be documented on Attachment 2.
6.2.8 Supervisor Review A. The Group Supervisors shall review procedures and changes thereto developed under their cognizance to assure:
- 1. The procedure complies with the requirements of Procedure 1000.05, " Procedure Format and Content".
- 2. Engineering and QC group personnel have provided input as specified in paragraph 6.2.5.
- 3. The independent review specified in paragraph 6.2.6 has been conducted and is satisfactory.
B. The supervisor shall indicate on the Procedure Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B) or on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C), as appropriate, the required effective date for implementation of the procedure or change thereto.
t C.
This review will be documented on the Procedure / Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B), or on the Proce-dure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C).
NOTE: If the Group Supervisor was responsible for de-veloping the procedure or change thereto, this review should be accomplished by the Cognizant Section Leader or Department Head.
6.2.9 Quality Assurance Program Compliance A. The Manager of Nuclear Quality Control shall review all safety-related Plant Administrative pro--dures (1000.XX Series) and changes thereto to insure their compliance with the requirements of the APL-TOP-1A. The department head is responsible for review of safety-related sectional Administrative Procedures and changes (10XX series) for sections reporting to him to assure compliance with the requirements of APL-TOP-1A. This review of Construction Management Procedures (4XXX series) is performed by the Field Construction Manager.
- ^ -"
_[ M ST... 69 .-N 4J .
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
p PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PRorenURF Ann Rev7sTOM rnMTant innn nA ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevision jCHANGE
,o o^Te DATE n><>> a, B. The Construction Quality control Supervisor shall review all safety-related Construction Management Administrative and Technical procedures in accordance with Procedure 4001.01, paragraph 5.5.
l C. Acceptance of the procedure or change thereto will be documented on the Procedure / Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B) or Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C), as appropriate, in the QA Program Con-currence block of Form 1000.06B or on the QA Program Compliance line of Form 1000.06C.
6.2.10 PSC Review A. PSC members shall be responsible for the review of all safety-related procedures and changes thereto for impacts of a safety-related nature on station activi-ties.
B. The PSC shall verify that each safety-related procedure and change thereto has been independently reviewed per paragraph 6.2.6 of this procedure.
C. The PSC is responsible for verifying that each proce-dure and change thereto requiring a docu.nented safety evaluation per 10CFR50.59 does not constitute an unre-viewed safety question as defined in paragraph 4.4 of this procedure.
The PSC shall document this determination on the Pro-cedure/ Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B) or on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C), as appropriate. In addition, thy shall indicate their approval of the documented safety evaluation on the Unreviewed Safety Question Evaluation sheet (Form 1000.06E), if applicable.
D. In the event the PSC determines that the procedure or change thereto either does or may involve an unreviewed safety question, the procedure shall be referred to the SRC for their review.
E. Procedure review and recommendation for approval shall be documented in the minutes of formally constituted meetings. Implicit in PSC recommendation for approval are affirmative findings reflecting paragraphs 6.2.10 (a)-(c) of the foregoing.
F. PSC approval recommendations shall also be documented on the Procedure / Work Plan Request sheet (Form 1000.06B) or on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C),
as appropriate.
1 m- n= . s = = u . . .u
.. . .; a uw.; .
L
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, DDAPDDDDP 4 LP EFUTOTAU FAUTDAT innq Af 6 as s wa uwaw aiu a m r A a 4 v.i w v.i A 4 4V h Aavv . s s ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvismN 7,DATr ,,, - ,
' CHANGE DATE " " ' " ' ' " "
6.2.11 Changes During Review If changes, other than editorial or typographical, are made to a proposed revision by a reviewer or review group, the reviewers which have already signed a proposed change shall be made aware of the change.
6.2.12 General Manager Approval A. The General Manager shall act upon the recommendation provided him by the PSC and approve each procedure prior to implementation. His approval shall be docu-mented on the Procedure Approval and Revision sheet (Form 1000.06A).
B. The General Manager shall sign the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C) to document approval of changes made to procedures, which did not violate the intent of the procedure, within 14 days of implementa-tion.
C. In the event that the General Manager and the PSC do not agree and resolution cannot be obtained, action shall be taken in accordance with paragraph 5.7.2 of this procedure.
6.3 Procedure Change Control 6.3.1 Procedure changes of either a permanent or temporary nature which are not immediately needed shall be handled in accord-ance with the requirements of' paragraph 6.2 foregoing, if safety-related, or paragraph 6.4 following if nonsafety-related. This practice should be followed regardless of whether the intent of the procedure is affected or not.
6.3.2 Change to Safety-Related procedures of a more immediate nature which do not involve an Intent Change and which may be either permanent or temporary can be implemented, provid-ing a knowledgeable member of the plant management staff, preferably the Cognizant Supervisor, reviews and approves.
the proposed change and an individual licensed as an SRO on the affected unit also approves the change.
A. Changes processed in this fashion shall be designated as either permanent or temporary. The PSC shall review all changes and the General Manager shall approve them within 14 days of implementation. PSC recommendation for approval and the General Manager approval shall be documented on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form
I PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION:
PLANT ADt!IN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, i m DP1'T C T hy /'A*'TD AT 1000 AK DD h { P TPD P PAGE 1, nr on aEvision , - oATE-ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE CHANGE DATE o , ,0,
, c ,
1000.06C). In addition, the General ?!anager approval ~~
shall be documented on the Procedure Approual and Re-vision sheet (Form 1000.06A) for permanent changes discussed next.
NOTE: If a safety related administrative procedure (1000.XX Series) is changed, the flanager of Nuclear Quality Controi, or his designee shall review the change. This review should be prior to the General Blanagers approval of the cnange.
B. Permanent changes will be reflected in the text of the latest procedure revision and be noted on the Procedure Approval and Revision sheet (Form 1000.06A) as PC-x (where "x" is the next sequential number reflecting per-manent changes to the existing revision of the procedure).
C. Temporary changes will be distributed as handwritten, providing the handwriting is legible and not 11Pely to be misinterpreted, on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C). They shall be identified as TC-x (where "x" is the next sequential number reflect-ing temporary changes to the existing revision of the procedure).
D. Permanent and Temporary Changes that are disapprovcd by the PSC and the General llanager, shall be stamped " Disapproved",
signed and dated by the PSC Chairman and the General flanager within 14 days of the implementation date.
E. Upon receipt of a " Disapproved" Permanent or Temporary Change in Document Control, Document Control personnel shall distribute a copy,of the " Disapproved" Change to the Control Room ?!anual within one (1) working day, forward one copy to the originator, and forward one copy to those l
l on distribution per the Controlled copy Log.
l F. The PSC shall action the appropriate individual if the work performed by the change must be reworked.
l
! 6.3.3 Changes to nonsafety-related procedures of a more immediate nature shall be handled in accordance with paragraph 6.3.2 above, except that SRO approval is not required prior to l
I implemertation.
I 6.3.4 The procedure change review and approval process is as de-picted in Attachment 1.
6.3.5 Temporary changes shall automatically expire 90 days af ter approval by the General Manager, or as so indicated on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C).
6.4 Nonsafety-Related Review and Approval Process l 6.4.1 All nonsafety-related procedures, work plans and changes thereto shall be reviewed by the Cognizant Section Leader and approved by the Department Head.
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, e srn nnncenrr.m
- . _ nenr. erne c_n ,n.- n r ,nnn ne p,G, ,, ,c ,, n ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvisioN , DATE -
n ., , n - , e .,
CHANGE DATE '"' ' ~
a NOTE: Where several departments may be affected, approval shall be by the General Manager upon the recommendations of the affected Department Heads.
6.4.2 Non safety-related overall station administrative procedures shall be approved by the General Manager.
6.4.3 The procedure review ,nd approval process is as depicted in Attachment 1.
6.5 Review Requirements 6.5.1 Every two years safety-related procedures shall be reviewed by an individual knowledgeable in the area affected (Emer-gency Plan and Implementing Procedures shall be reviewed annually). Further guidance associated with this review is contained in Procedure 1000.02, Plant Safety Committee (PSC)
Operation.
A. A revision, which is developed as a result of an over-all review of the procedure, shall be considered as satisfying this requirement. In this case the appropriate block should be checked on Form 1000.06B, Procedure / Work Plan Request.
B. Responsibility for conduct of the review 4.s as assigned in the responsibility column of Attachment 1 to Proce-dure 1000.04, " Procedure Program Requirements".
C. The PSC secretary shall potify the responsible indivi-dual of the required com'letion p date as prescribed in Pro-cedure 1000.02, Plant Safety Committee (PSC) Operation.
6.5.2 Applicable procedures shall be reviewed following unusual events, such as unexpected transients or accidents, signi-ficant operator errors, and major equipment malfunctions.
A. Procedures to be reviewed shall be determined by the Cognizant Section Leader, with PSC concurrence.
B. The purpose of the review shall be directed towards insuring that the procedures did not, in themselves, create a situation which tended to permit the event to occur and assuring that the procedures are suffi-ciently complete to assist in preventing the event from occurring in the future.
6.5.3 Applicable operating procedures for safety-related systems defined by the Technical Specifications Section 3.0/4.0,
" Limiting Conditions for Operation", shall be reviewed and revised as required following any modification to a system prior to the system being considered operational.
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDUREiWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL,
- vn prvicTnv cnvTont ,nnn nA non ce nt_rp r .
PAGE 3g nr on ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvisiON CHANGE
- ,-DarE -
DATE n,in,<e, A. Procedure revisions as a result of modifications are described in procedure 1000.13.
B. The Cognizant Section Leaders or Group Supervisors shall be respensible for drafting new procedures and changes to existing procedures, with assistance from the Engi-neering Superintendent.
6.5.4 Procedure changes required as a result of changes or addi-tions to licensi.ng documents, regulatory requirements and guidance, Technical Specifications and vendor recommenda-tions shall be initiated and developed under the cognizance of the affected Section Leaders or Group Supervisors. The Plant Administrative Manager, assisted by the PSC Chairman and the General Manager, shall be responsible for notifying the Cognizant Section Leaders of these requirements.
6.6 Deletion of Procedures 6.6.1 Procedures which have been replaced by other procedures or are no longer applicable shall be deleted by completion of Form 1013.02M. The deletion of procedures requires the ap-proval of the General Manager or a Department Manager, as appropriate.
6.6.2 The original (master) of the procedure to be deleted and any changes thereto shall be stamped "0BSOLETE" and re-tained in the Records Center file. The working copy shall be destroyed.
6.6.3 A notification of deletion, form 1013.02N, shall be sent to those on distribution per the MPDL and the Controlled Copy Log, Form 1013.02E.
6.7 Validation of Maintenance Procedures 6.7.1 Validation should be performed on all new and revision of
( existing maintenance procedures and periodic tests per-formed by the Maintenance Department. This should deter-mine if procedures are adequate for the task to be per-i formed and. understandable and useable by the person per-forming them.
l 6.7.2 A validation checklist, Form 1000.06F, should be attached l to the front of the procedure during procedure development.
6.7.3 A procedure should be performed to validate its contents.
6.7.4 The person that performs the procedure should complete Form 1000.06F.
I
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, h pporrnitpr AMn OrVTRTOM rntfTRoi I 1000.06 16 nr 29 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE -_PAGE aEvisioN >> DATE o,i07eR, CHANGE DATE 6.7.5 After microfilming, Form 1000.06F should be detached from the procedure and routed to the Sr. Heintenance Coordinator.
6.7.6 The Sr. !!aintenance Coordinator should maintain a log of procedure validations.
6.7.7 After the new revision of a procedure has been performed at least twice (once for procedures performed annually) and its contents are satisfactory, Form 1000.06F may be removed from the working copy of that procedure. The Sr.
Maintenance Coordinator should notify Document Control when Form 1000.06F should be removed.
NOTE: At least one of the first two times a procedure is per-formed, it should be accomplished by someone having only the minimum knowledge of the task that would be expected to perform it.
6.7.8 If a procedure's contents is not satisfactory, a new re-vision should be submitted with another Form 1000.06F attached to it.
6.8 Verification and Validation of Emergency Operating Procedure (EOP)
Changes (applicable to Unit One E0P only).
6.8.1 When making a change to a Unit 1 Emergency Operating Proce-dure, attach a completed copy of Form 1000.06G to the pro-cedure to be submitted to the PSC for approval.
6.8.2 The Form 1000.06G is to be maihtained with the Records Copy.
7.0 ATTACH!!ENTS AND FORMS 7.1 Attachment 1 - Procedure Preparation and Change Flcwsheet 7.2 Attachment 2 - Procedure Review Checklist 7.3 Form 1000.06A - Procedure Approval and Revision sheet 7.4 Form 1000.06B - Procedure / Work Plan Request sheet 7.5 Form 1000.06C - Procedure Change Request sheet 7.6 Form 1000.06D - Safety-Related Classification 7.7 Form 1000.06E - Unreviewed Safety Question Determination
! 7.8 Form 1000.06F - Maintenance Procedure Validation Checklist l
7.9 Form 1000.06G - Emergency Procedure Change verification & Validation checklist.
l L
PLANT MANUAL SECTiON: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
) PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, 5 nnnermme sen nrpTcTnir en m nr i n n n n rs I
~~"
'~ ~ ~ ~
PAGE 1, -r ,o ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvisioN CHANGE
,,oATE- n,,n>,e,
'OATE ATTAC1HE'Tr 1 Page 1 of 2 Prece+>re Preparation and Chanee Flowsheet Procedure or Procedure Change Denuest
~ NO /Sa f ety Relate Procedure or (
Procedure ChangeI l Te.acdia t e, Need,j
[
Typed as PC or Pe'. YES g
Gr up Supervisor
, , No stediate)
SeCtton
'kw -
IIced Leader !
Peview YES r
Cep a r ts.e nt l ifead Apareval l , NO Intent
' N Change YES scral
_YI* Station Note 1 ------- ---
Engineering Admin. (Por non-routine Peview Pro Maintenance & re-l pair procedures) j
- Quality Control NO y e
--l Review
+ Indepenaent l Supervisor l Review l R evi ew I Note 2 Notes 3&5 I l SRO l Notes 4 & 5 l Anproval I.
L.
V Group Supervisor Review
' (for safety-related administrative NO ------------------------------
Procedures) I h suanu De rma nen tl7 Program Concurrence
- i nS '
l Proccoure Change J ped as PC ar Rev.
- , Note 6 i PSC Devtew . . . . . . . . .
s .
CM Approval l
- i skC Review a l Note ?
- - l Document Controt l ' *
[and Omst ribution 1 ;
- , e < r leptesentation et '*---*d Procedure or Procesed Ch nge
~~-
PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURENVORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, n n~ n~ ~e ~r n r. ~r . .,n n r e r. c~-y n u cremnnr
-m .~~ i n n n. nc
,,,, o r nn ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvisioN , oarE ~ e,,n-,e, CHANGE DATE ' ' ' " ' ' " "
NOTES TO ATTACIIMENT 1 Page 2 of 2
- 1. Normal route for procedure change requests identified either as Permanent Changes or Revisions with no immediate need.
- 2. Independent Review may be accomplished by PSC providing one member is knowledgeable in the specific area being reviewed.
- 3. Route for procedure change requests of a permanent nature required im-mediately which do not change the intent of the procedure and which have
~
been reviewed by the Cognizant Supervisor and approved by an SR0 on the unit affected.
- 4. Route for procedure change requests of a temporary nature which were re-quired immediately where the intent of the procedure was not changed.
- 5. PSC Review and GM Approval required within 14 days of implementation to satisfy Technical Specification requirements vis-a-vis Temporary Changes to procedures.
- 6. Permanent Changes and Revisions will be indicated on Procedure Approval and Revision sheet (Form 1000.06A). Changes of a temporary nature will not be indicated on Form 1000.06A, but instead will be distributed as written on the Procedure Change Request sheet (Form 1000.06C) following GM Approval.
- 7. SRC Review required for those changes which potentially constitute an un-reviewed safety question as determined by the PSC.
NOTE: If SRC concurs with PSC evaluation, change must be submitted to NRC for their review and approval prior to implementation.
PLANT MANUAt SECTION: PROCEDUREfWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, nonerntme s un prt'7c 7nu enuTont 1onn nc PAGE to n r on ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevisiON CHANGE
,,DATE
'DATE n,,n.ie, Attachment 2 Page 1 of 4 PROCEDURE REVIEW CHECKLIST A. TECHNICAL REVIEW The items identified below reflect the depth of consideration involved in a detailed technical review. Where examples of procedural types are in-dicated, they should not be construed as being the only types of proce-dures for which the item is to be considered. Each of the identified items should be considered; those which do not apply should be marked N/A. Additional items considered should be noted in the COMMENTS section following the last item. It is expected that a number of the items may well be considered as N/A for procedural changes which, although consi-dered to be INTENT changes, are relatively minor in nature and do not have a widespread impact.
The rc.iewer need only place a J (or N/A) in the space provided.
ITEM REVIEWER
- 1. Safety-related classification is correct.
- 2. Procedure format is as desired.
- 3. All outstanding changes have been incorporated.
- 4. Related Standing or Special Orders are incorporated.
- 5. System design requirements satisfied.
I Example: Portions of systems designed for low pressure are valved out prior to admitting high pressure fluid.
- 6. Component design requirements satisfied.
l Example: A cautionary note is provided which stipulates that no l
more than two or three restarts are permitted for l large motors in any one hour period.
- 7. Redundant system / component operability is not violated.
Example: In racking out a breaker, an interlock will not per-mit redundant system operation.
'8. Steps specified to be accomplished sequentially can be done in the established order.
l 9. Valve lineup checklists, instrument lineup checklists and l
electrical power supply lineups:
i
- a. Reflect existing as-built conditions
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, ppncrnimp tvn Det7TRTny en"TonT 10A0 OA PAGE on nr og ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE _aEvisioN CHANGE 4-DATE n, n><n, DATE Attachment 2 Page 2 of 4 ITEM REVIEWER
- b. Are correct to initiate system startup
- 10. Pre-startup checklists insure system operability Example: If called upon to initiate automatically, safeguards systems will function.
- 11. Applicable Technical Specification requirements in both Appen-dices A and B are identified.
- 12. Controls are specified or referenced to insure that system cleanliness requirements are not violated.
- 13. Where system boundaries have been opened, inspections are specified prior to closure.
- 14. Where code welding is required, the procedures specified to be used are-in compliance with ASME requirements and the Authorized
, Inspector is aware of and approves the proposed repair work.
- 15. Identified prerequisites are sufficient such that the activity contemplated can be performed as specified in the procedure text.
- 16. Standard nomenclature, i .e. , noun names and/or alpha-numeric designators, is specified in the procedure and is as the operator or technician will recognize.
Examples: Valve designations Pump designations Switch or breaker designations Alarm designations Instrument designations
- 17. Observable parameters are specified in operating procedures, for example, and are correct for system conditions as they may exist at the time.
Example: Upon pump s~ tart at shutoff head, a pressure or motor amp reading might be specified.
- 18. Inspection points are specified in non-routine maintenance and repair procedures.
- 19. Accept / reject criteria have been established in maintenance procedures, for example, and directions are provided to resolve out-ef-tolerance measurements.
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, nonernene sen crurerne enemnnr ,nno ne PAGE os e on ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE _aEvision ,- DArr n ., , n - , -
CHANGE DATE ""# " ' ' " "
Attachment 2 Page 3 of 4 ITEM REVIEWER
- 20. Calculations made to establish setpoints in instrument calibra-tion procedures, for example, are correct and proper inputs have been used.
- 21. Signoffs are identified in complex procedures to insure that important steps are not inadvertently skipped.
- 22. "As-found" and "as-left" readings or measurements in periodic test procedures, for example, are specified and provisions are made to record, either in the procedure body or on a data sheet.
- 23. References specified to be used in the procedures, such as tech-nical manuals, drawings, and vendor instruction sheets, are correct and up to date.
- 24. Where consumables may be specified in a chemistry or maintenance procedure, for example, they have been uniquely identified and the quantity (ies) to be used are correct.
- 25. Provisions are made, where applicable, to record the use of calibrated measuring and test equipment and to assure that M&TE used is in calibration.
- 26. Provisions have been made to either pre-identify, or record the use of, spare parts used in maintenance and repair procedures.
- 27. Special tools wh h may be required areI specified or provisions are made to record their use.
- 28. Provisions are included to insure that systems and components are returned to their normal operating status following comple-tion of inspection, test, or maintenance efforts.
NOTE: The Job Order shall insure that required tests are completed on the system or component prior to its being considered operable.
- 29. Caution notes, timiting operational considerations and precau-tionary safety information are provided at appropriate points in the procedure text and are uniquely highlighted.
- 30. Review and approval signofts are specified, where applicable, following completion of the activity.
- 31. Assure Form 1013.02M " Deletion to Station Procedures," is cone pleted and attached if this procedure supersedes any other procedure.
i .
PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, noncrmmr
~ ~ "
sun nrpTernu enument
' 3nnn nc
~
PAGE no mr no ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevision CHANGE n orrE ne,n,,e,
'DATE Attachment 2 Page 4 of 4 B. Miscellaneous Licensing Document Review ITEM REVIEWER
- 1. Precautions have been taken to assure that Fire Prevention and Protection requirements are not violated.
- 2. Where the potential exists. for significant personnel exposures, measures have been considered for minimizing cuch exposures such as:
- a. Crew briefings
- b. Mock-up training
- c. Additional temporary shielding
- d. Decontamination
- e. Remote read out of area radiation dose rates Example: During resin sluicing or transfer operations
- f. Remote instrument read out Example: Temperature read out for freeze seals in high radiation areas
- g. Use of tents or bags to contain po'tential airborne releases and/or prevent the spread of surface contamination
- 3. Considerations have been made with respect to maintaining the integrity of the physical security installation.
Example: Where repeated entries and exits to Vital Areas may be required, it may be appropriate to station a Guard Force member to control access.
- 4. If applicable, the procedure will not have an adverse impact on the environs surrounding the plant.
Other items considered in the review should be indicated on an attached sheet.
Reviewed By Date Approved By Date
r PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADBIIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL,
,- ..m -,.m-,. - - , ,,,, ,
5 a vv u nu v a m .iv a a v A a A v.i u v.i A agv A . a ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE amsioN CHANGE 7 oArr
DATE me,m,,e,- -
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Arkansas Nuclear One RECORD OF CHANCES AN'D REVISTO':S l FORM NO. gng gg REV. #12 PC # J l Safety Related YES O NO O PAGE REV PC# PAGE REV PC# PAGE REV PC/l PAGE REV PC# PAGE REV PC#
1
~~
l l
l l
l l L:
l l
C '
l l
l A ROW D BY: APPROVAL DATE REQUIRED. EFFECTIVE DATE:
(General flanager) h .
Rbh .
N N
r PLANT M ANUAL SECTIOit PROCEDUREMORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
g PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, PROCFDURF AND REVTSTOV ('nVTROL 1000.06
(
i a PAGE 94 nf 90 M ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvisiON ,, oaTE
~
, ,ii i /n "
CHANGE DATE ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY b
-=
5,1 Arkansas Nuclear One PROCEDURElWORK PLAN REQUEST I Fcau maces T6TLE ASSIGNED NO. AEV AF FECTE Q UNIT ANO 1 O ANQ 2 C PROCEOURE C WORK PLAN _O , g, ,, ,
on Fors 10C0 06A + " gar rient Rand corner JR3'**E: Ef aSON FCA AEVISIONS i
1 l
i %
i I
( *i46 l4 [
- b a
36 A complete review of the procedure has been conducted and those sections which need to be revased have been ancluded in this revtston. This rewtew satisf aes the cri-terna for peraodse procedure review as def tned by procedure 1000.02 and naciuded a O YES O I.'O l review to assure conformance with format and content requirements of procedure 1000.05.
Superseces er revaces another procedure O VES U NO -
N yes. compete and attaen Form 1013 C2M INPUT / REVIEW AEQUtAED. 10 CFR 50 59 APPLICABIUTY: (Unre. *ed Safety Ovest.on) YES NO (Referne Proc. 1000 06)
YES NO involves a change to a procedure described an the FSAR. . .O O _
involves a chance to a test or esoerirnent not described in tne FS AR. . .O O ENG GROUP O O in,o,ves a ceance inat affects compaance witn ene Technical Specifications. . .O O OCGROUP 0 N th* 'esponse to any of the above is YES. complete and attach FORM 1000 06E.
T3
..f PAEPARED 8Y: DATE pggy:pf D EFFECTIVE DATE.
6 !
Immediate . . .p, m para Upon Receipt -
W Desired Dale "4-Other ..
~
,.sonee.os=r eevia e ears -
C "
on Paocaaw concuaat uct tFor ad proceoutescas,3 DATE .
oues.wisose cars PSC AEviEW: DATE 'I UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION VESO Nou va,;
i .
( .ty .w i Ma;;; :
..wJ,._. :-. ...f4d
.W.2*.*.
.r - .6__ .r -
Eh"* $ 6'** J ~ * }.
g 9
- MM y _
h
- . 6 , i. -
r PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURElWORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PL\NT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL,
, _ ,- ,,-,.,c,~., -, ~
> svuuss a a a avav vv . a ss a a
, e- m r ,n ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aevisiON ~~; oATE~ m,r-re,- -
' " ' '~
CHANGE ^'DATE .
.e s r ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Arkansas Nuclear One TITLE #000 00C PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUEST l FORA. NO.
REv. # 11 PC #
l PERMANENT Q l CHG. NO :
- N TEMPORABY O l PROC / WORK PLAN NO. REV. g gg g g gum g,g gg gg gg lavokse a change to a proc. ,re desenbod m the FSAR. ...... .. ..O O lavosves e change to e test er esperiment not desent>ed m the FSAR . . ...O O EXPtRATION DATE. (lF TEMPORAAV) WWeee met Meets complience wth the Technical Specifcetione . ..O O If the response to any of the abo.e se YES comolere and ettech FORM 1000 06E.
I DETERMINATION OF INTENT- YES NO involves a change m the PURPOSE of the procedure . .. . ........O O ANO-1 O ANOL2 O involves e change en the SCCPE of the procedure . .. . .. ..O O .,,
Degeoes the controis preecebed m the Admm Procea,res . .. . ....O O Is the Procedure / Work Plan invoivos e change that reduc.e the seves of earety. .. . . ..... .. ...O O being changed a safety 6avokse a enenge that degredes ce eccepinace ca.tene . . . . .. ..O O .,
related Procedure / Work Plan? l i, g% ,e,,,,,, ,, .ny ,, in, 3 . ,e yE_s,,the m chence must be rewe=ed by the YES O NO O { PSC and soproved by the GM em to impiementation.
PEASON FOR CHANGE.
PARA / STEPS AFFECTED DESCR:PTION OF CHANGES.
r l
l s.:
PREPARED BY; OATE. IF INTENT CHANGE:
(ENG GROUP) DATE UNREVIEWED vEs O NO O DATE SAFETY QUESTION _
cOC GROUP)
DATE (INDEPENDENT REVIEW)
($UptaveSOR) OATE INTERrM APPROVAL; OATE (QA PROGRAM CCMPLIANCE) DATE (COG SUPERVISQR)
OATE (PSC) OATE (SRO UNIT ONE) eux .
OATE LSMO UNif TWOy CATE _
(Gup k
- bh 15*"'mme= N
r PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, ppnermmr om orPTcTny cnetonr l '~
innn nr, PAGE v nr on ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEvisioN CHANGE 1,DATE nqfnyfoq F DATE t . -
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Arkansas Nuclear One SAFETY RELATED CLASSlFICATION l FOPM 1000 060 PROC. NO.
, QUESTIONS: #
ygs no 1.
Is the activity identified in Section 6 8 of Appendix A or Section S.S of Ap.
pendia B of the Technical Specifications?
O O NofE. Sectron 6 8 of te e Tecan. cal spec.f4 shoas ee'eeeaces Requtasorv Guide s 33 eNh re'e*ences and enoo'ses ANsl N1a F and subsequentir a war.ety of oenee stancatos.
premansy the ANSs has 2 senes.
N if the answer to the above question is YES, the procedure is safety relat.
ed; it NO, proceed to question 2. e 2.
Is the enmponent, system or structure specified in the Technical Speciff-cations?
O O
- 2. Is the component, system, or st ucture specified on the O list?
O O
- 4. Wilt e component malfunction during operation, an operational error, or an error committed during performance of the enticipated activity d# rect-ly create e situation where e system identified in Section 3.0/4.0 of the Technical Specillcations must actuate or be considered as degraded? O O If the answer to any of the above three questions is YES. proceed on to question 5. if NO. the activity is non safety retated. ',
5.
If the component. system or structure is a pressure retaining member re-qulred by AflSi B31.7 (Unit 1) or ASME Section III (Umt 2h will perfor. ,
mance of the activity disturb the pressure retaining capabihty? n O If the answer to the above question is YES, the activity contemplated is safety related, if NO, proceed to questior' 6. '
8-i Must the component as a whole, perform an active function for the sys-tem to be considered operable?
O O
- 7. In performance of the contemplated activity, will a subcomponent, which is safety related be affected?
O O For example:
(1) in replacing a pump seal which is not considered to functionally af.
tect the safety 4etated performance of the component, must one remove l or disturb the t' earing which may well affect the safety-related function?
If so, the answer to question 7 is YES.
E:.C (2) in replacing the manual breaker operating switch at the MCC for a normaily closed. motor operated, safe quards system valve wnsch is an active comDonent, will Ur'e oesturb the logic CerCult or the nnrmal oCen-Ing circuit for the valve motor? It not, the answer to question 7 is NO.
! If !"e answer tJ either Question 6 of 7 is NO. the antecipated activity is not safety-related. -
L~~
COMPLE T ED BY. DATE CONCunnE NCE BY. DATE INOEPENCENT PEv'EW BY DA TE APP 40 VAL BY. ICEPT MGAIPSC CHAtRMAN) DATE !
f hC
r PLANT MANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: ' NO:
= PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, E & A s v v a. u v 4 5
,m,, m,
.uiu eu r Av4 - vv.i 4 4 t v a. s',
6 .v -
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE _ Revision "',DATE"
, n, gn, ,o , e -
CHANGE DATE " " ' " ' ' " "
d 9 y- ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY f i Arkansas Nuclear One M UNREVIEVED SAFETY Ql'ESTION DETEFMINATIN. l FORM NO.1000.06E REV. # 6 PC # s Document No. CifG/REV.NO. ,
Ql'ESTIONS:
YES NO
- 1. Would the proposed procedure or change increase the probability of occurrence of an accident analyzed in the FSAR? O O '
- 2. Would the proposed procedure change increase the conse-quences of an accident analyzed in the FSAR?
Q C -
- 3. Would the proposed procedure or change increase the prob-ability of any malfunction of any equipment assumed to '*-
function in an accident analyzed in the FSAR? O O
- 4. Would the proposed procedure or change increase the conse-quences of any malfunction of any equipment assumed to function in an accident analyzed in the FSAR? O -
- 5. Would the proposed procedure or change create the possi-bility of an accident of a dif ferent type than any analyzed -
in the FSAR? O O c
- 6. Would the proposed procedure or change create;the possibility of a malfunction of a dif ferent type than any analyzed in the FSAR? O O
- 7. Would the proposed procedure or change decrease the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification? O O BASIS FOR DETERMINATION (List FSAR sections and/or Technical Specification bases reviewed)
L:
C:"'"
CO'1PLETED BY: DAIE CONCl:RRENCE BY: DATE
[5 DEPENDENT REVIEW BY: DATE APPROVED BY:(PSC CllAIRMAN) DATE h4 6
5, _
r NO:
PLANT MANUAL SECTiON: PROCEDURElWORK PLAN TITLE:
PLANT ADMIN. PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, um nrvicTnu cnument innn nA Tmncrmme PAGE og np on aEvisiOu y DArE ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE CHANGE DATE n, ,n r 23 l
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Arkansas Nuclear One TITtE. MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST l FORM NO- 1000.06F ,
REV d6 PC #
PROCEDURE NO. REV. TITLE Yes No
- 1. Was the wording or intent of any step dif ficult to / / L7 understand? e
- 2. Were there any safet'/ conaiderations that should / / L/ .
be evaluated?
- 3. Does the technical content require any changes (set- / / /7 points, calculations, specifications, etc.)?
- 4. Vas any additional information other than th.c / __/
_ ((
specified in this procedure required?
- 5. Did this procedure cause any adverse or unexpected /7 L7 -
plant conditions that should be avoided in the future? e
- 6. Va . a temporary or permanent change submitted for / / / /
this procedure?
f j 7. Comments?
s,.
If any question is answered yes, explain.
Performed By Date Validation Reviewed By Date en
{
l t -
Kww h s -
1 -_
/
r PLANT M ANUAL SECTION: PROCEDURE / WORK PLAN TITLE: NO: l r PLANT ADMIN. ' PROCEDURE REVIEW, APPROVAL, 3 nennemmr
'-' om rrcTcTn" cn"Trnt~ innn or 1 PAGE ,n mr >n
- o*TE -
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE aEviSiON CHANGE DATE n,,n- e, ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Arkansas Nuclear One -
N e.. e e - e. .,.., e ~ e. . . e ~ , . .. e l FORM NO. _ , ,
VERIFICATIC!! A'!D VALI*ATIC!! CHECKLIST REV. #17 PC # J Procedure No. Rev. Title Yes No
- 1. Does the procedure change ecmply with the philosophy in the Emergency Operating Procedure Writers Guide? O c
/
- 2. Does the procedure change maintain the integrity of !!RC -
commitments as specified in the Emergency Operating Pro-cedure Bases Document? c o N
- 3. Is the procedure change understandable as written with no additional information? c c
- 4. For precedure changes that require cperator acticn to acccmplish a task, are all necessary actions specified? a a
- 5. Does equipment, instrumentation, etc. exist to be used to .
acccmplish the steps of the procedure change? o a
- 6. Is equipment and instrumentation accessible and capable of '
being cperated in the manner described in the procedure change? o o r-l i
If the answer to any of the abo /e questions is !!6, explain in the coraents section.
Comments
- 7. Does the p'rocedure change require a revision to the Writers Guide or Bases Document? 1.e., addition to the acronyms and terms list, a change in Writers Guide Philoscphy, addition or 56:
change to !!RC coraltments, addition or change to bases docu-ment refertnces, etc. O a
. If yes, attach a copy of the revised portion of the applicable document. _
Verification and Validation Performed By Date Reviewed By Date Approved By Date (FSC Chairman) h 1
i 1 -- _ _ __ ___ _