ML20090C244

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application for Issuance of Subpoenas to H Blanding, RA Guiffra & R Woytowich Re Tdi Crankshafts on Diesel Generator Sets.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20090C244
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/09/1984
From: Scheidt D
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
OL, NUDOCS 8407130216
Download: ML20090C244 (56)


Text

REUJ'="e n* * . -

2FE'CFh'CE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C ' ' - -'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS5ICN Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board '84 JL 11 A10:43 u...,

u00Ce f.. SING lik SEANCH

)

In the Matter of )

)

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY )

)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power ) Docke: No. 50-322-OL Station, Unit 1) )

)

)

SUFFOLK COUNTY ' S APPLICATION F R ISEUANCE OF SUBPOENAS Suffolk County hereby requests the Presiding Cfficer of l this Licensing Board to issue subpoenas under 10 C.F.R. S 2.720 to command the production of documents and the testimony by deposition of a panel of employees of the American Bureau of Shipping (" ABS"): Howard Blanding, Vice President, Robert A.

Guiffra, Principal Surveyor - Machinery, End Robert Woytowich, Senior Surveyor. Although representatives of the County con- l tacted ABS shortly af ter learning in mid-May that Transamerica e Delaval, Inc. ("TDI") had attempted to gain approval of the replacement crankshaf ts on the Shoreham diesel generator sets from the ABS, the County was not informed until July 3, 1984 I

that none of these individuals would provide substantive informa-l tion about this matter without being subpoenaed. The County was informed that these individuals would not provide information 8407130216 840709 PDR ADOCK 05000322 4 0 PDR \

because of the posture of this litigation and because they believed that a possible conflict of interest might exist if they were voluntarily to provide the County with information about a submission by one of their clients.

Messrs. Guiffra and Woytowich were the ABS representatives at a meeting on March 14, 1984 among various representatives of TDI, LILCO and Failure Analysis Associates. The attendees discussed the criteria that ABS would use to approve the replace-ment crankshaf ts on the diesel engines at Shoreham, and TDI requested ABS approval of the crankshafts on the basis of their torsional characteristics using ABS's criteria. The testimony of Messrs. Guif fra and Woytowich, both of whom have no apparent interest in the outcome of this litigation, should provide details as to what TDI and LILCO discussed during the meeting.

Subsequent to that meeting, and in connection with attempting to obtain ABS approval of the Shoreham engines, TDI submitted directly to Mr. Giuffra copies of TDI's torsional analysis of the Shoreham engines and other information which is attached as Exhibit 1. /

LILCO now claims that ABS has certified the replacement crankshafts at Shoreham (see LILCC's Response to Suf folk County's Filing Concerning Litigation of Emergency Diesel Generator

  • / Although as early as February 29, 1984, the County had requested copies of all correspondence with ABS, these documents were not produced to the County until June 22 and July 5, 1984.

Contentions, June 21, 1984, at 11) on the basis of the informa-tion submitted to ABS by TDI. The alleged certification consists of a letter signed by Mr. Giuffra in response to TDI's submission (see Id., Attachment 4). Based upon the County's review of the documents submitted to ABS by TDI, the County believes that some t

of the documents contain incorrect information. For example, l TDI's forcing function value, "Tn," which is used in the ABS formula, differs significantly from the forcing function found by FaAA to be appropriate. The County has reason to believe that if FaAA's value for the forcing function had been submitted to ABS and were used in the ABS formula, the replacement crank-shafts would not comply with the ABS requirements. Thus, the County believes that the alleged certification by ABS may have been obtained with incorrect data. If the correct data were i

used the crankshafts would not meet ABS requirements. The County seeks to depose these ABS representatives responsible for the alleged certification in order to obtain their views on ,

the certifiability of the crankshaf ts based on information which the County believes is accurate.

In addition, the County believes that the letter from ABS to TDI concerning the replacement crankshafts is not an official ABS certification. The testimony of both Messrs.

Blanding and Giuffra is needed to explain and clarify the significance and effect of this letter. The letter is based

solely upon TDI's submittal to ABS, including the results of strain gauge testing. It is important to ascertain the weight given by ABS to such test data. Mr. Blanding recently informed representatives of the County that, although he would not pro-vide information voluntarily, he would explain the of ficial significance and effect of the alleged certification letter if he were deposed.

The Count ( also requests the production of documents in the custody, control or possession of these individuals and ABS relating to TDI's submission and request for approval of the crankshafts for the Shoreham diesel generator sets: corre-spondence with TDI, notes of conversations or meetings with TDI, calculations made and criteria used by ABS. These documents directly relate to the subject matter on which the individuals

~

are to be deposed.

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the depositions of Howard Blanding, Robert A. Giuffra and Robert Woytowich will produce information of important relevance to the issues in this pro-ceeding, particularly to the issue of whether or not the replacement crankshaf ts have been certified by ABS. As Messrs.

Blanding, Giuffra and Woytowich will not appear for deposition voluntarily, Stdfolk County requests this Board to issue sub-poenas requiring them to appear, produce documents, and give their depositions in this proceeding.

_ .~ - . . ._ _ ._

5-t Respectfully submitted, Martin Bardley Ashare Suffolk County Department of Law  !

Veterans Memorial Highway  !

Hauppauge, New York 11788 4 e=* $-

Herbert H. Brown  !

Lawrence Coe Lanpher Alan Roy Dynner Douglas J. Scheidt. I KIRKPATRICK, LOCKHART, HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 .

Attorneys for Suffolk County  ;

p July 9, 1984 ,

t I

a 5

0

, , - , - - - - ~ , -- ,--e -, - , - . . - , , , , , , ,,- ,. -- ,-+ - , - ,- -v-- -n .

m-m --

~~

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . , ,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board c.,,-

c-

~ ~.a..v.

'84 JLL 11 A10 :44

)

In the Matter of ) - . _ .

) YCCA{iiN b$b,~

BRM;CS LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY )

) Docket No. 50-322-OL (Shoreham Nuclear Power )

Station, Unit 1) )

)

SUBPOENA TO: Howard Blanding Vice President American Bureau of Shipping 65 Broadway New York, New York 10006 YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED, pursuan.t to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and Section 2.720 of the Rules of Practice of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the " Commission") to appear, produce documents and give your deposition in this proceeding at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, July 18, 1984, at the offices of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, 919 Third Avenue (Thirty-Second Floor), New York, New York, as re-

_ quested by Suffolk County, to testify on matters related to the submission by Transamerica Delaval, Inc. ("TDI") to ABS concerning the crankshafts on the diesel generator sets at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Documents to be produced are correspondence with TDI, notes of conversations or meetings with TDI, and any calculations and criteria used by the ABS in acting upon TDI's submission.

Under Section 2.720 (f) of the Rules of the t Commission, you may by motion promptly made ar.d in any i l' event at or before the time specified herein for compliance f and upon notice to Alan Roy Dynner or Douglas J. Scheidt, l counsel for Suffolk County, request that this subpoena ,

d be quashed or modified if it is unreasonable er requires j evidence not relevant to any matter in issue in the proceed- ,

ing as indicated above. The Commission may condition its

^

denial of such a motion to quash or modify this subpoena on ,

l just and reasonable terms.  ;

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h ATOMIC SAFETY AID LICENSING BOARD l

Lawrence J. Brer.ner Presiding Judge Issued: July , 1984 Bethesda, MD ,

i l

n 6

l l

l 4

f

. _ . . ___ _ _ . , . _ _ , _ _ _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ . . __ _ ,._ _,__,. _ ._._.., _ _ ___._., _ m . _ , . _ , _ . . _ _ .

._ .- _ -.~ . -

4 --...,_,,__

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ,

CO'.-Er .

% .-a. .

In the Matter of )

i A10.44 l

)

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) L ?,q .'4JE:e

) Docket No. 50 C{3222 4 ,gL;I'T'),EF (Shoreham Nuclear Power )

Station, Unit 1) )

)

)

SUBPOENA TO: Robert A. Giuffra Principal Surveyor - Machinery ,

American Bureau of Shipping 65 Broadway New York, New York 10006 YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED, pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and Section 2.720 of the Rules of Practice of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to appear, produce documents and give your deposition in this proceeding at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, July 18, 1984, at the offices of Paul, Weiss, ,  ;

Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, 919 Third Avenue (Thirty-Second Floor), New York, New York, as requested by Suffolk County, to produce documents and testify on matters related to the submission by Transamerica Delaval, Inc. ("TDI") to ABS concerning the crankshafts on the diesel generator sets at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Documents to be produced are correspondence with TDI, notes of conver-sations or meeting with TdI, and any calculations and criteria used by the ABS in acting upon TDI's submission.

Under Section 2.720 (f) of the Rules of the I Commission, you may by motion promptly made and in any i

event at or before the time specified herein for compli-ance and upon notice to Alan Roy Dynner or Douglas J.

Scheidt, counsel for Suffolk County, request that this subpoena be quashed or modified if it is unreasonable or requires evidence not relevant to any matter in issue in the proceeding as indicated above. The Commission may condition its denial of such a motion to quash or modify this subpoena on just and reasonable terms .

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

~-

Lawrence J. Brenner Presiding Judge Issued: July , 1984 Bethesda, MD k

k a- - ,

~- 2- - . _ . - - _ . . . ~

ggjfr ::r.'.ETOMDN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ,

Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board cuy- r -

US: ... _

)

In the Matter of )

'84 Jul.11 A10 :44

) i LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) g . : .; u .. _

) Docket No. 50-322-0DifiEFf5 'SC V.

SRANCH (Shoreham Nuclear Power )

Station, Unit 1) )

)

i SUBPOENA TO: Robert Woytowich

~

Senior Surveyor American Bureau of Shipping 65 Broadway New York, New York 10006 YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED, pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and Section 2.720 of the Rules of Practice of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to appear, produce documents and give your deposition in this proceeding at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, July 18, 1984, at the offices of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, 919 Third Avenue (Thirty-Second Floor),

New York, New York, as requested by Suffolk County, to testify on matters related to the submission by Transamerica Delaval, Inc. ("TDI") to ABS concerning the crankshafts on the diesel generator sets at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Documents to be produced are correspondence with TDI, notes of conversations or meetings with TDI, and any calculations and criteria used by the ABS in acting upon TDI's submission.

i

~~

Under Section 2.720(f) of the Rules of the Commission, you may by motion promptly made and in any event at or before the time specified herein for compliance and upon notice to '

Alan Roy Dynner or Douglas J. Scheidt, counsel for Suffolk

< County, request that this subpoena be quashed or modified 4

if it is unreasonable or requires evidence not relevant ,

to any matter in issue in the proceeding as indicated -

above. The Commission may condition its denial of such a motion to quash or modify this subpoena on just and reasonable terms. . 7 i

i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 4

h Lawrence J. Brenner Presiding Judge i

Issued: July , 1984 Bethesda, MD ,

f i

I t

s Exhibit 1 -

m e

/) / # d' n__,..

. 20D;CE

///fil/7/// . .)l/7(f/// 6 -

kl / ////ff .

. W ""

n-

. L u.co v. .

. ii..  :%. M . i 9 risic EA JW 11 A!0:44

.>:, - RTW:cl t..: r . ; .: . . . . .

f 3 May 1984 DCC MJ.E'q % TS-3

= R M,'cH Transamerica Delaval DSR-48 Diesel Engine / Generator '

for Long Island Lighting Company Shoreham Plant Report on Crankshaft Torsional Stresses.

Trcnsamerica Delaval Inc.

Engine & Compressor Division 550 85th Avenue P. O. Box 2161 0:kland, CA 94621 Attention: Mr. Roland T. M. Yang Manager Applied Mechanics.

G:ntlemen:

W2 have your letter of 3 April 1984 submitting copies of the above subject report for our review, and with regard thereto have to advise as follows:

Wa note from the submitted report that the torsional vibration stress in the crank-shaft for the first mode 5 order critical speed (422 RPM) was expected to approach cr exceed that permitted by the Rules for the submitted crankshaft material.

Wa further note from the submitted report that tests were conducted to determine the cetual stresses in the crankshaft, and that these tests indicated a substantial mar-gin of safety against fatigue failure due to torsional vibration.

f B2ced on the submitted test data, and on submitted service experience with similar cngines having similar torsional critical speed arrangements, we advise that we would -

have no objection to the submitted torsional critical speed arrangement for use on dissel generator sets on an ocean going vessel, insofar as our classification require-ments for marine service are concerned.

t Three (3) copyies of the subject report, stamped to indicate our review, are being re-turned.

t Very truly yours, G. E. T. X. R. F. M. H.

S. O. R.T.Y. C. R. ('

AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING R E C EIV E D l

W. M. HANNAN TICKER MAY 071984 um:

(

Vice President

, . ENGINEERING O

  • WWf/ rig:

CIRC. FORWARD COPY

_,,,; s g C cc: LILCO. (E. Montgomery) by:, J.

. s, Accounting Dept. v/ enclosure Robert A. Giuffrgj Legal Dept. (M. Adams) Principal Surveyor - Machinery Subject File 460 vette est rir.44:.tse: :as.t amtu *!  ::: a.  : tot 3:tc tit i i raes sca 23rcu wm etens:

Trtnsamitica Delavat Transamerio e m ,,ee a ,e C o m ,,e ,,o , o _ ,,o-D8IaVgl 550 85th Avenue P.O. Box 2161 gg Oakland. Cahtornia 94621 4 If*

, M15) 577 7400 April 3, 1981 American Bureau of Shipping 65 Broadway New York, NY 10006 Attention: Mr. Robert A. Giuffra Principal Surveyor, Machinery

Subject:

Report on Crankshaft Torsional Stresses Transamerica Delaval Model DSR-48 Serial No. 74010/12 for Long Island Lighting Company

Dear Mr. Giuffra:

As discussed during the meeting on March 14 in your office between yourselves, Mr. Gene Montgomery of LILCO, Dr. Simon Chen of Power 6 Energy international, Dr. Paul Johnston _of Failure Analysis Associates and myself, I a= sending you four copies of the " Report on Crankshaf t Torsional Stresses" for the three DSR-48 engine generator sets at LILCO's Shoreham plant.

You will note that the report has four sections and contains calculations, test data and operating experience which we consider relevant material to establish the adequacy of these DSR-48 engine generator sets.

The similarity between the DSR-48 referenced in the report are outlined in page 17 and 19. On page 28 are operating hours logged for similar DSR-48. Worthy of note are the Rafha engines which have operated between 5500 hours0.0637 days <br />1.528 hours <br />0.00909 weeks <br />0.00209 months <br /> to 8250 horrs at a load level between 3200 KW and 3300 KW.

Due to the time constrcint on this project, please give this matter your ,

earliest attention. We look forward to receiving your approval.

Very truly yours, IRANSAMERICA DELAVAL INC.

Engine & Compressor Division O. ~

s C

/o.w '/[- . l d-

~ Roland T. M. Yang Manager Applied Mechanics cc: G. Trussell RTY:dmh G. Montgomery P. Johnston Enclosures ABS-San Francisco

l

. i I '

~

REPORT ON CRANKSHAFT TORSIONAL STRESSES TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL MODEL DSR-48 Serial No. 74010/12 for LONG I5 LAND LIGHTING COMPANY i

i, l .-

REVIEWED DI ACCORDAliCE M ABS LEmP. D M ,

Roland Yang.

ggg g Aoril 4. 1984 Transamerica Delaval AggAN INN Oakland, CA.

or St1LPFING xEW N  !

_--,m. - - -ew,y -w- , - . ,,- m %,---> r.,,., ,,.,.,.-.----,.p-, - - - , . - - . . _ ,

TABLE OF CONTENTS I introduction Pages 1 & li Section One Torsional Analysis Pages 1 to 17 Section Two Torslograph Tests 18 to 21 Section Three Strain Gauge Tests (FaAA) to Section Four Operating Hours Logged to a

INTR 0DUCTI ON This report consists of four sections and contains calculations.

test data and operating experience, which Transamerica Delaval Inc.

(TDI) considers relevant material to establish the adequacy of these DSR-48 engine generator sets.

(

The application of these units are for emergency standby service in the LILCO Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. These units are rated at 3500 KW and have an overload rating of 3900 KW (111.4%) allowed two hours per day of twenty four hours.

Section One. Torsional Analysis.

A four page introduction is included here, explaining the method and nomenclature used in the torsional cri tical speed analysis.

The mass elastic system in the analysis reflects the piston skirt which has since been superceded. The extra reciprocating weights due to the heavier replacement piston shirt have been evaluated and the change concluded to be negligible. The effect of the 111.4i overload on torsional stress levels are shown in pages 12 to 15 Due to the close proximity of the calculated stresses to the ABS allowable stress, we elected to include Section Two..

Also included in this section are mass elastic system paraceters of other DSR-48 engine generators of identical rating, to establish the similarity of these units, especially from a torsional standpoint.

Section Two. Torsiograph Tests.

Measurements by FaAA/$WEC and TDI are presented here , along with TCl measurements on other DSR-48 engine generators of identical rating and similar mass elastic system. Here again, the intent i s to establish the similiarity between the various DSR-48 engine generators . The stresses evaluated from the torslograph measurements are still in close .

proximity to the ABS allowable and therefore in Section Three, we present the actual strain gage measurements, taken on the subject  !

shaft in January, 1984.

  • Sertion Three. Strain Gage Test. i Here the measured Strains are listed along with the corresponding stresses. With the similar grade of crankshaft material, the endurance limit of the shaft is established and finafly the margin of safety 7

'- ' +--=m,- -

e , - , , _ _ , .____n.,_,_

~

A factor of safety of the determined using the Goodman diagram.

replacement crankshaft is 1.48 without the benefit of shot peening.

The factor of safety is 1.75 as determined by FaAA, when the effect of shot peening is taken into account and taken to increase the endurance limit by 20%.

g Section Four. Operatine Hours Logged.

There are seventeen engine generator sets of similar configuration and identical rating in Saudi Arabia with considerable operating hours. These similar units are running regularly and generating power today. Worthy of note are the DSR-48 units at Rafha, with 5500 hours0.0637 days <br />1.528 hours <br />0.00909 weeks <br />0.00209 months <br /> at 3200 KW on one unit and 6200 hours0.0718 days <br />1.722 hours <br />0.0103 weeks <br />0.00236 months <br /> at 3300 KW and The similarity of these 8250 hours0.0955 days <br />2.292 hours <br />0.0136 weeks <br />0.00314 months <br /> at 3200 KV for the other two.

units are listed in page 17 Examination of the mass elastic data (I & K) and the torsional natural frequencies (N) listed, will show that the e are no essential differences between LILCO and tne rest of the units. The LILCO units are undergoing performance tests at their Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, the total hours logged at loads of 3500 KW and above, are shown on page 28.

Summary.

Based on the foregoing calculations, test data and operating logs, Transamerica Delaval, Inc considers the adequacy of these DSR-48  ;

engine generator sets to be established for the intended service at the LILCO Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.

Il

TNTRODUCTION I2 TORSIONAL CRITICAL SPEED ANALYSIS _

The engine generator syste= is modeled as a system of mo=ents of inertia interconnected by torsional springs.

The standard procedure is to concentrate all the moment of inertia of each crankthrow, including rod and piston at the corresponding cylinder cenktr position. The moment of inertia per cylinder is obtained by su= ming the moment of inertias of the journal, crankpin, two erankwebs, counterweights (if used), rotating part of connecting rod and the equivalent inertia of the reciprocating parts, (namely the upper end weight of the rod and the piston) .

The moment o5 inertia (I) is calculated by dividing the WK by gravitational acceleration (g). WK2 is obtained by multiplying the weight of the part hy the square of the radius of gyration (K). WK2 therefore, would beunits. in Lb. In.2 or Lb.Ft.2 units and inertia (I) in Lb.In.Sec.2 or Lb.Tt.Sec.2 The inertia values, thus represent the concentrated inertia of the noving parts at each crankthrow.

From our torsional vibration analysis data files, we obtained the appropriate

~alues of inertia or stiffness to make up the.model.

The protedure and notations used in this analysis are explained below.

NATURAL FREOUENCY EUALUATION This is done by Holzer's method. In our Holzer's tabulation, the definitica of the notations are as follows:

6

(,J2EIGENVALUE (0=ega squared), in 10 radian /second hv. Mass number, counted f rom the f ree end of the engine INERTIA Inertia of the various masses, in lb.in.sec.

THETA Relative amplitude or angular position, in radians.

10M2T Product of INEPTIA *a4* THETA, and is the vibratory torque due to cach mass, in 10 6 ft.lb.

6 SIGNAM Su==stion of the vibratory torques, in 10 ft.lb.

SRAFTK Torsional stiffness of shaft, in 106 ft.lb/ radian.

DTHETA Quotient of FIGNAM divided by SHAPTK. This is the '

relative angalar displacement between masses. The unit is radians.

I

~. , . -

STRIS! EVALUA~ CN Tron the Holzer Tabulation, we dete rmine the f ollowing, which are later used in the stress calculations.

This is the su==ation of the products of INERT:A SIGl% I

  • THETA ** 2 and THETA squared. The first of the two printed, is that of the engine up to and including the last crankthrow and the second, that of the I whole system.

These are the maximum stresses in the shaf ting T INT and 7 EXT within the engine (Internal) and outside of the engine (External). The stresses are evaluated f or each section of shaf ting by this f or=ula:

SIGNAM * #[I* 16 160 7fD~7 Only the maxi =u=s are printed out.

STRESSED D AMETER OF at EXTERNAL SHATT This is the diameter of the external shaft which the maximur stress occurs.

E(r! LIER:rM If the applied and resisting torques are applied AJ7LITUDE and suddenly recoved, the shaft is put into a state of free vibration and the curve of angular displacement can be analyzed into a series of norral elastic curves, each corresponding to one of the normal modes of free vibration of which the syste is capable. The amplitdude of any of these codes of vibration under the above conditions is referred is the te as the EQUILIBRID: ASLITL~)E, . since it caplitude which is attained without any magnificatien due to resonance with an external pulsating cou le.

It is determined by:

Piston Area

  • Crank Radius
  • 180 T3"N (J Z* 100 *sLIG2HG-
  • Tg $ 14D3 This is lef t in the form- - - - Constant 1 The work output into the system and is deter =ined by:

T IN

  • Piston Area
  • Ctank Radius * /
  • TglE93 f This is left in the form - - - -Constant 2
  • Tg *1G93f FE Hysteresis damping due to friction, etc. and is determined by:

77*ra2* 10 6

  • gig 2 *f2 25

~ '

TD Visecus Da ;er darping, f ror this expression:

ISO ,

bM Da rer Rinc ( lb.ft.y)

  • 12 *M3
  • T'
  • 33000 *rc2 C
  • 86700000
  • 30
  • Q)

FCR Rubber coupling da= ping, and is determined by:

f Coupling Stif fness * (.00037(D-20) (D-30))

  • DTHETA of cplc 2 D is the duremeter of the coupling rubber.

Steel coupling da= ping, and is deter =ined by:

FCS Damping coefficient

  • DTHETA of coupling FF Propeller da: ping f rom this expression: _. ,

<T[*12*1.82*106 gj 2

  • 106
  • bh:
  • Gear Ratic
  • THETA of prep:

Har=enic

  • RPM 3 T IN- Static Stress IN!ernal, which is the product of T INT and EQUILIBRIUM AM?LITUDE. This is left in the ferr --------

Constant 3*Tg*D3 T EXT Static Stress External, which is the product of T EXT and EQUILIERIUM MKPLITUDE. This is left in the for:

Constant 4* Ig *IEGg 4 Tctal d.s ping is the sun of FE + FD A TCK+FCS+FF ,

In the stress calculation rabulatien we have the following celurns, some of which are calculated f rom the values previously deter =ined.

ORDER Harmonic of the mode of vibration.

RPM Resonant speed of the harmonic, or critical speed.

TN TN, which is the harmonic cceponent determined from the Fourier Analysis of a cylinder pressure diagra=.

VEC 3EGy, This is the vector su=mation of THETA of the crank- ,

throws, f or the engine's firing order, of the particular harmonic.

TSTINT Static stress Internal and is determined by T INT, which is:

Constant 3 N N TSTEXT Static stress External and is deter =ined by F EXT, which is:

Constant *T g

  • 2G g PHI f,thefront end amplitude in degrees at resonance, and is determined by:

F F IN = Total Damping

- - - - - - - - , , a. - - - - ,n,n~ . , , ,- -- -. , - - *

.. . .- .. . : --.L..

, . e t

T)AX!  !!aximur internal resonance stress in FSI, whi:h is:

PEI

  • T IN! r TliAXI Maximur external resonance stresses in PSI, which is:

PHI

  • T D3 When plotting the stresses versus RPM, the off resonant stresses are determined by:

TSINT or TSTD3 MAG 5:FICATION FACTOR 2 RPM Where !!agnification Facter = 1 1 Resonant RP) 3 i

J e

1 e

e b

e

. , . - , --- ,-,,w- ,, --- -- , , , , - , - . , --,er,. -,,,,,,,__,--,,.e,

f SECTION ONE TORSIONAL ANALYSIS.

G

t f

TORSIONAL AND LATERAL CRITICAL SPEED ANALYSIS ENGINE NLHBERS 74010/12 DELWAL-ENTERPRISE ENGINE MODEL DSR-48 3500 L"4/4889 BMP AT 450 RPM TOR STONE 6 VEESTER ENGINEERING CORP.

LONG ISLM:D LIGu. TING CO.TANY TRANSAMERICA DELWAL ENGINE & COMPRESSOR DIVISION ,

550 - 85th AVENUE  ;

OANLAND, CALIFORNIA 94621 F

By: ROLAND YANG AUGUST 22, 1983 L.

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Delaval-Enterorise Engine Model DSR-48 3500 KW/4889 BHP at 450 RPM 225.6 BMEP Engine Numbers 74010/12 ,, g g, m m a m e  % e E Ee J C -

t"

% =  % - * = =  % i f

B

  • . . . . E i

~ '

E I I I I I Iv I

v v o u v .v v v l

l Mass Elastic System Crankshaft Gear 26.52 Water Pump Drive 63 10 Cats & Idlers 119 70 Shaft 9.63 ,

2 218.95 lb.ft.' i - 6.805 lb.ft.sec.

Crankthrow No.1 As No.2 crankthrow 1541.85 Shaft 41.81 2 2 1583.66 lb.ft. i -49 222 lb.ft.sec.

Cranktnrow No. 2 to 7 Journal 43.13 Crankpin 202.17 Two Webs 679.81 Reciprocating Wt. 309.99 Rotating Weight 3u6.75 2 2 1541.85 lb.ft. I -47.922 lo.ft.sec.

Crankthrow No.8 As No. 2 Crankthrow 1541.85 Shaft 71.63 2 2 1613.48 lb.ft. 1 =50.149 lb.ft.sec.

Crankshaft Flange 255.08 Flywheel 73 x 6i 34764.

Generator Shaft 374. 2 2 35393 08 lb.ft. I =1100.052 lb.ft.sec.

2 2 Generator Rotor 85275 lb.ft. i =2650.432 lb.ft.sec.

2 Total VK = 133335 lb.ft.

NOTE: The reciprocating weight used above are based on 800 lb.

The replacement "AE" psiton skirt is 26 lb. heavier. We have evaluated the effect of this weight cifference and sonclude that the change in natural_ frequencies and stresses

EQUIVALENT LENGTH D e = 1" 6

Front Gear to Cylinder No.1 .0001661"  %= 58.121 x 10 ft.lb./rae.

Between Cylinders .001139 'v' K = 84.727 x 10' f t . lb./ rad.

f Cylinder No. 8 to Flywheel .0012547" K = 76.941 x 10 ft.lb./rac.

Flywheel to Generator i i g

  • >- n. &"

,- /JZ .

- 3" _.

J4* __

43-Ws 1 -

n

,r b ,

P '

h

, , , . ~ . .' 'q, - , _

4

-Q-+  %-k %-4 - -

'g h

N 4y 4

-- e o h ,, ,,

,r e =_ -

3$ k_l$ 5l _

7 -- -- --

f _ l .

7

/Jf" "_ _8h

  • _ l 9$ ~ ) l _

gg~  : _

gj'

.4 .

i-g ,3 .0515 x 16.25 055 x 16 + 9 + .03 x 16 20' 16"

.03 x 16 + 13.25 .021 x 16.572 .c21 x 16.572 + 16.5/L 4 4 18 16.572

= .0000132 + .0001580 + .0001183 + .000593 = .0003458" 6

K = 276.773 x 10 ft.lb./ radian Shaftine Diameters Front gear ro Cylinder No. 1 8" .

Crani: pin 12" Cylinder No. 8 to Flywheel 12" Generator Shaft 16" Flywheel' Weight 6935 lb.

Gen. Rotor Weight 17150 lb.

Torsional Natural Frecuencies First Mode 2323 vpm Electrical Natural Frecuency Second Mode 5575 vpm g , 35200 /11260 x 60 = 175 vs Third Mode 7000 vpm 450 g 133335

._. . _ _ _ -- .s-

. m

MODE 1 OMEGA SGuARED IN (RADIANS /SdCONDi++2 = .05918702 NATURAL F REQUENCY IN V.P.M. = 23A3.19 DTMtTA TmETA IOM2T SIGMA M SMAFT K No. INERTIA 403 403 58.1 .00693 1 6. 8 1.00000 .03890

.99307 2.893 3.296 84.7 2 49.2 .27084 6.002 84.7 3 47.9 .95417 2.706 84.7 '.10041 47.9 .88333 2.505 8.508 4 84.7 .12662 47.9 .78291 2.221 10.728 5 12.590 84.7 .24859 6 47.9 .65629 1.861 1.440 14.030 84.7 .16559 7 47.9 .50770 .17704

.970 15.000 84.7 8 47.9 .34211 .20132

.16507 490 15.490 76.9 p 50.1 13.130 2/6.8 .04744 10 1100.1 .03625 -2.360 2650.4 .08369 -13.129 .001 11 1

MODE _.

.0592 OMEGA SC IRED NATURAL F NEQuENCY 2323.1900 SIGMA I+ THETA ++2 2385.7810 SIGMA I+ THETA ++2 2707.4896 T INT 9561.73 T EXT 3419.27 16.00 STRESSED DIAMETER OF EXTEANAL SnAFT .000852131052 E3u!LIERIuM AMPLITUDE 7 IN 7467.33 F INT 6. 15

~ ext 2.91 FE 17744629. ,

FD 0.

0. '

c CR F C6 .

O.

FP 0.

TSTEXT PnI TMAXI TMAXE C93ER ROM TN VEC TSTINT 889.8 318.2 738 7053. 2522.

.5 4646 155.86 .701

.158 1513. 541. i

1. 0 2323 94.58 .146 112.7 40.3 1471.3 526.1 1.454 13904 4972.
1. 5 1548 129.52 1.394 6408. 2292.

125.7 45.0 .670

2. 0 1161 41.05 .376 1.050 10036. 3589.

71.71 1.394 814.6 291.3 929

2. 5 6. 9 .044 423. 151.

774 16.16' .146 19.3 3.0 244.3 87.4 .376 3596. 1286.

3. 5 663 42.79 .701 1191.1 425.9 2.066 19754. 7063.

4.0 580 27.66 5.285 48.5 .216 2063. 738.

4. 5 516 23.76 .701 135.7 210.

20.7 7.4 .061 587.

5. 0 464 17.37 .146 52.2 .433 4138. 1480.

422 12.84 1.394 145.8 176.

5. 5 6. 2 .052 494.

387 5.68 .376 17.4 517.

- 6. 0 51.0 10.2 .151 1447. f

6. 5 357 4.49 1.394 '
4. 4 1. 6 .013 125. 45.
7. 0 331 3.69 .146 494. 176.

.701 17.4 6. 2- .052

7. 5 309 3.05 38.8 .322 3076. 1100.

2?O 2. t2 5.285 108.4 131.

8.0 12.9 4. 6 .038 366.

8. 5 273 2.26 .701 67. 24.

.146 2. 3 .8 .007

9. 0 258 1.97 176.

1.53 1.394 17.3 6. 2 .051 492.

3. 5 244 110. 39.

.376 3. 9 1. 4 .012 10.0 232 1.27 132.

221 1.14 1.394 13.0 4. 6 .038 368.

10.5 1. 2 4 .004 34 12.

11.0 211 1.02 .146 51.

202 .89 .701 5.1 1. 8 .015 144, ,

lao % ~ ~ C e m 244 4

P MODE 2 OMEGA SQvAAED IN (AADIANS/E-CCND)+o2 = .34090021 ,

NATURAL FREQUENCY IN V.P.M.

= 5575.52 TmETA IOM2T SIGMA M SMAFT K DTnETA ,

NO. INEATIA 2.320 2.320 LB.1 .03991 1 6. 8 1.00000 84.7 .2175e 49.2 .96009 16.110 18.430 2 84.7 .36070 47.9 .74257 12.131 30.561 3 84.7 43433 4 47.9 .38187 6.238 36.799

.857 35.942 84. 7 42421  ;

5 47.9 .05246 I

.47667 -7.787 28.155 84.7 .33230 6 47.9 84.7 .17632 47.9 .80898 -13.216 14.939 7 84.7 .01366 47.9 .98530 -16.096 -1.157 8 76.9 .23093 50.1 .97164 -16,631 -17.768 9 -295.538 276.8 -1.0678o 10 1100.1 .74070 -277.770 2650.4 .32710 295.542 .004 11 l

MODE 2 DMEGA SouARED .3409 NATvAAL FREQUENCY 51 5.5200 5;GMA I+ THETA ++2 2578.9556 SIGMA I+TrETA++2 13306.1514 T INT 22715.43 T EAT 76963.02 S-AFT 16.00 5 RESSED DIAMETE4 CF EXTEANA .000030103703 EQu!L: 6A;um A~Pu:TUDE

IN 7487.23 F INT .68
EAT 2.32  :
E 110479321.

FD 0.

F C; 0.

CS 0.

Fp 0.

TSTEXT Gm! TMAXI TMAKE RPM TN VEC TSTINT CRLER 5*4.6 .255 5792. 19624.

.5 11151 155.86 1.508 160.7 997. 3379.

16.3 55.4 .044

1. 0 5575 94.58 .253 1137.0 .625 14418. 48851.

3717 129.52 3.789 335.6

1. 5 19.7 66.8 .201 4567. 15474.
2. 0 2767 41.05 .702 35260.

185.8 629.5 458 10407. .

2. 5 2230 71.71 3.789
9. 5 .012 279. 945.

1858 16.16 .253 2. 8 ,

3. 0 44.1 149.5 .130 2953. 10006.
3. 5 1593 42.79 1.508 5849.

22.9 77.6 .076 1726.

4.0 1393 27.C6 1.211 1694 5739.

1.508 24.5 83.0 .075

4. 5 1239 23.76 .009 209. 709.

1115 17.37 .253 3. 0 10 2

5. 0 112.7 .105 2386. 8085.
5. 5 1013 12.84 3.789 23.3 1192.
5. 5 18.6 .015 352.
6. 0 929 11.42 .702 79.7 .066 1500. 5084.
6. 5 857 9.08 3.789 23.5
82. 278.

.253 1.3 4. 5 .004

7. 0 796 7.61 21.6 .018 405. 1373.

743 6.17 1.508 6. 4

7. 5 4.1 14.0 .012 269. 911.
8. 0 696 5.00 1.211 300. 1018.

1.508 4. 9 16.6 .013

8. 5 655 4.74 44 149.

.253 .7 2. 4 .002

9. 0 619 4.08
6. 7 22.6 .022 510. 1728.
9. 5 586 2.58 3.789 79. 266.

67 .702 .9 3. 0 .003

0. 0 557 4. 4 14. 8 .017 382. 1293.
10. 5 531 1.63 3.789 .001 23. 77.

.253 .2 .8 11.0 506 1.42 .005 118. 400.

1.15 1.508 1. 2 '. 0 349.

11. 5 464 Ao7 005 103. g

- So t aRD 1A

I MODI 3 I OMEGA 4GUA4ED IN (AADIANS/ScCOND)Och = .53730427 I NATURAL FREQUENCY IN V. A. M. = 7000.26 NO. INERTIA TnETA IOm2T SIGMA m S-AFT K DTnsTA 1 6. 8 1.00000 3.657 3.657 38.1 .06292 2 49.2 .33708 24.787 28.444 84.7 .33571 3 47.9 .60137 15.487 43.931 84.7 .51850 4 47.9 .08288 2.134 46.065 84.7 .Sc369 5 47.9 .46081 -11.867 34.198 84.7 40362 i E 47.9 .86443 -22.261 11.936 84.7 .14088 7 47.9 -1.00531 -25.889 -13.953 84.7 .164E8 47.9 .84063 -21.648 -35.601 84.7 .48019 4 76.9 .E0997 9 50.1 .42044 -11.331 -46.932

'O 1100.1 .28953 112.041 65.109 276.8 .23524

l 2650.4 .04571 -65.109 .000 FODE 3 OMEGA SQUARED .5374 NATL A A'. F4EQuENCY 7000.2500 SIG?A I+ THETA ++2 2375.2154 E*GPA I+TmETA**2 2997.4770 ,

T INT 28370.37 T EX~ 16955.47 STRESSED DIAMETER 04 EXTEANAL SMAFT 16.00 EOv!LIBRIuv. A?.Pu!TuDE .400084773254

IN 7487.33 i.

IN7 2.46

EAT 1.44 F E 160397580.
D 0.

F ;; 6.

C5 0.

=D 0.

DER RAM TN VEC TSTINT TSTEXT Gn! 7 MAXI TMAxE

.5 14000 155.8E .355~ 365.7 214.0 .111 3223. 1887.

1. 0 7000 94.58 .857 199.0 116.4 .102 2969. 1738.
1. 5 4EEE 129.52 3.103 986.9 577.6 .358 10371. 6070.
2. 0 3500 41.05 2.525 254.6 149.0 498 14432. 8446.
2. 5 2800 71.71 3.103 5*E.4 319.8 .258 7486. 4381.
3. 0 2333 16.16 .857 34.0 19.9 .029 831. 486.
3. 5 2000 42.79 .955 100.4 58.8 .057 1E44 962.
4. 0 1750 27.66 1.970 133.9 78.3 .085 2468. 1445.
4. 5 1555 23.76 .955 55.8 32.6 .033 943. 552.
5. 0 1400 17.37 .857 36.5 21.4 .022 623. 365.
5. 5 1272 12.84 3.103 97.8 57.3 .059 1717. 1005.

E. 0 1166 11.42 2.525 70.8 41.4 .038 1111. 651.

E. 5 1976 9.08 3.103 E9. 2 40.5 .037 1079. 632.

7. 0 1000 7.61 .857 16.0 9. 4 .008 245. 143.
7. 5 933 6.17 .955 14.5 8. 5 .008 226. 132.

8.0 875 5.00 1.970 .?4. 2 14.2 .013 384 225.

8. 5 823 4.74 .955 11.1 6. 5 .006 167. 98.
3. 0 777 4.08 .857 8. 6 5.0 .005 131. 77.
9. 5 736 2.58 3.103 19.7 11.5 .013 367. 215.
0. 0 700 1.87 2.525 11.6 6. 8 .009 248. 145.

10.5 666 1.69, 3.103 12.9 7. 5 .009 275. 161. i 11.0 636 1.42 .857 3. 0 1. 7 .002 67. 39.

11.5 E28 1.15 .355 2. 7 1. 6 .002 66. 38.

.96 1.970 4. 7 2. 7 004 120. 70.

12. c 583

. _ _ _ _ _,_ ,_ _. _ __. .. _ _ _ w

Th Y ::::

  • 64 Q h i

. .._z . _ _

1

_J I

. . . . ......._..s_.. \;

Q \ A .

..___.._._..._g...._.._m._.....'

..I f

. enc 4CN~x.5M mo Am z'

,n

>-..____.__...__... 3. 11 .

>I / v

[! _ _ _ . __

i . jZ U.

g  :.$....._[_ (

iU

s g U.

i ti 9 .N

.g o .l..

l Q. e

. .(

.; . 3( ,

r. '

T i / .{-

pN -

1 h

- - {., ; i <>

I 3  ;

- i, - .t : \^

y 1

4-  ! . i,l .

1 5 .G _2. y'

. . .q Y >

1- 7 TTT  : -

I i 4 _a '

5

.h  : f "I h ' ;) {>.>b.. :rf. . . .' . h. .~. .

__- N _.,

m -

N .

~

~  :.I 7

s J  %

g _ _ __ _ . L . . . . _ . _ _ ,; .

6 . ,

t ,I ;d N 3 _n C =.;._ b _.- -- .

s ,,

'7, .

r.0 .

q -

j ru W -

. /.

W .t: - - -- -

. .: e . y . . .. . . .v. 4 s _ -

i o

M ,, f 'b .

,#)

h

) L.3 }- N . .

j -

1 .:....M -

/i .

. _ . j .q.

.h3' .

i...  : f...:.. :

h  ;

  • k J,

..._ . .g . l 4 ,N . O i.

. g}.lj',,{

I

~ ~ ~'

Il} le_

( (N }  ;. f L., .:

  • - A 2 n  ?

1  : Ai Q s:. f.:.

- ,Q -V), . . , .

~. .-

,.i" . d

-1 - . . . ., . g . ..

_.  ! '-- !.  ! I i

j 11 J} ' u+l > - .:  : .

i u w A t. .

.i . . .:  : 1 l M 2 .

  • - T. s- ^

i

.%i  !  : --

R . --

  • . - g

.i.r. _.

. :- j

. . . j .

j t  ; .

- i

.1 ...

~

i s .h.:l...-l...:

,:  : J l 9 l

N y*.'  :

t

.j };...'j:[.[.'.j..:2..,.:Lp ... i.'

f l

I i.

] .1 r

i i.

1

...........,-[:.

- : . : -< 7 .:._a .
.'q . .: :.: ... - ::::1.

..._.3.

l -

t 2-

- I 7;j" . :- -

T. I

- i' i

]. ; ii lt-* 1- __

f . - *2 ' -

..
4 -...j...% '..:..: 1.-

1.. -

..1 l

l. l

-t " - - -- - - -- L -

i l,  : g .

1.  : . g : .r.:==: . . . .;;i i -  ; i j r . . e .==r  ;

... g:_1.L y N ]s

. i ~ _

1

._. .j. ~ .; . .!. . . : :.:! __.-. _. : ._ _:_ _2 2-  :.;_ ,-

l-  :

2, ,4 . . . , .t i.

. i.

15i . j: .:..:a{: .::::

. .. ... . ;2 ._:. . - .
.
l .:3:  :-_ ...

_. l _ . ;. . .. . ..._..._. _-- .

. ..: :,.r.:: :-:ut.. ::-

r.

3. . t ,i il.

j.: i. i ll, . !c -- ,..0 2 i f '.i :l .2: 7i . ._!p.

.- -l  :

__.._..._ .. _.. l __. _l .. ..! _. . . ,

p

- i l .

p: q; . l *. _. ..:-- :- ;

The preceeding pages show tne analysis based on the nameplate rating of the engines. To illustrate the changes in amplitudes and stress i levels when operating at 111.4% (3900 KW) or overload condition allowed for two hours per day, we supplemented the analysis with the following

! pages.

The changes in the amplitude. and stress between the two load conditions are reflected in the "T sub n" (T ) values. The following is a listing n

of,the 111.4% T n divided by the 100% nT f r the orders or harmonics calculated. The ratios show the increase in amplitude and stress level l due to the extra load at 111.4% Ioad operation.

t ORDER FIRST MODE SECOND MODE THIRD MODE 5 1.1040 1.1040 1.1040 1.0 1.0777 1.0777 1.0777 i 15 1.0963 1.0963 1.0963 2.0 .8877 .8877 .8877 2.5 1.0817 1.0817 1.0017 30 1.1733 1.1733 1.1733 3.5 1.0694 1.0694 1.06ct L.0 1.0600 1.0600 1.0600 4.5 1.0669 1.0669 1.0669 5.0 1.0662 1.0662 1.0662 5.5 1.0639 1.0639 1.0639 6.0 1.0370 1.0727 1.0727 i 6.5 1.0379 1.0727 1-0727 ,

7.0 1.0379 1.07L9 1.0749 7.5 1.0361 1.0729 1.0729 8.0 1.0357 1.0700 1.0700 85 1.0398 1.0738 1.0738 9.0 1.0406 1.0735 1.0735 r 95 1.0196 1.0581 1.0581 10.0 1.0157 1.0431 1.0481 10.5 1.0175 1.c473 1.0473 11.0 1.0098 1.0423 1.0423 1.0112 1.0261 1.0261

. 11.5 12.0 1.0000 1.0313 1.0313 From the above, the increase in amplitude or stress level due to the fourth order at 111.4% load will be about 6t higher than that at 100!.

.5, 1.5, 2.5, If we calculate the stress levels at 450 RPM due to the '

4.0, 4.5. 5 0, 5.5 orders and sum these by the S_quare Root of the Sj,m of the S_quares , the overall anpli tude at 111.44 (4154 Asi) will be about 7% higher than that (3879 psi) at 1004 load.

- ---- - -______38.___________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____

w"R:

.wt.

OPE;-L SCJL;ED IN (RADION5/SECOND)++2 = .05926702 NDTUCO_ FEOgEN:y IN V,:'.v. = 2222.19 ND. INER IL T-ET; IOM2T SIG*Q M SmA:? K L -E :

1 6. 6 1.00000 403 402 56.1 .0053 2 49.2 .99307 2.893 2.196 86.7 .22&p0 2 47.9 .95417 2.70E E.002 64.7 .0 05- .

4 47.9 .86333 2.505 8.506 64.7 . lect 5 47.9 .78291 2.221 10.725 s'. 7 .126E2 6 47.9 .65629 1.661 12.590 6.7 .145=3 7I 47.9 .50770 1.440 14.030 6*. 7 .li!!)

8 47.9 .34211 .970 15.000 84.7 .17 0-9 50.1 .16507 490 15.490 76.9 .201 ;

10 1100.1 .03625 -2.360 13.130 176.6 .047 c 11 2650.4 .083E9 -13.129 .001 MODE 1 OMEGA SOUARED .0592 NATURAL FREQUENCY 2323.1900 SIGv4 I+ THETA ++2 2295.7610 5'G*A I+T-ETA ++2 1707.4696 7 IN~ 95E;.72

~

EYT 3419.27 5 :.EEEED DIovE~E: 0: EXTENL. E-G - 16.00 E }. I m

  • B : * .* Av ~.s I T UDE .000E52131052
*N 74E7.22
N .. e.,
c. - :g- u . o. .
  • E 17744629.

FD 0.

F C: C.

F C5 0.

FP 0.

l ORDE; RPP TN VE: T5 TINT TS E(T DHI TML)I T** E

.5 46*6 172.07 .701 962.4 351.3 .806 7710. 2 57.

1. 0 2323 101.93 .146 121.5 43.4 .164 1571. 552.
1. 5 1548 141.99 1.294 1612.9 576.8 1.559 16909. 5321.
2. 0 1161 36.44 . 376 111.6 39.9 .659 6305. 22:5.
2. 5 929 77.57 1.294 6E 1.1 315.1 1.099 19505. 27!!.
3. 0 774 18.9E .146 22.6 6.1 .042 404, 145.

662 .701 261.3 93.4 .3E9 3717. 1229.

3. 5 45.76
4. 0 560 29.32 5.2E5 1262.5 451.5 2.119 20257. 7244 4, 5 516 25.25 .701 144.7 51.8 .222 2127. 761.

464 18.52 .146 22.1 7. 9 .0E6 62E. 224

5. 0 1574
5. 5 422 13.66 1.394 155.2 55.5 .460 4402.

387 .376 18.0 6. 4 .052 512. 162.

. 6. 0 5.89 526.

6, 5 357 4.66 1.394 52.9 18.9 .157 1500.

.146 4. 6 1. 6 .014 129. 46.

7. 0 331 3.83 152.

7.5 309 3.16 .701 18.0 6.5 .954 512.

8. 0 290 2.61 5.285 112.3 40.2 .333 3166. 11 ~ 9.

13.4 4. 8 .040 380. 12E.

6. 5 273 2.35 .701 25.
9. 0 256 2.05 .246 2. 4 .9 .007 69.

244 1.394 17.8 6.4 .053 504 160.

9. 5 1.56 40.

10.0 232 1.29 .376 4. 0 1. 4 .012 112.

1.394 13.2 4.7 .039 37*. 124.

10.5 221 1.16 211 1.02 .146 1. 2 .4 .e04 35. 12.

11.0 52.

202 .90 .701 5.1 1.8 915 145.

11.5 - - ~ e e me w

MODE 2 OMEGO SQUARED IN (RADIANS /SECOND)++2 = .34069903  !

NGTURAL.FREGUENCY IN V.D.F. = 5575.51 NO. INERTIA THETA IOM27 SIGMA M 5"A:7 K DT-E~;

1 6. 8 1.00000 2.320 2.320 56.1 .02?9.

l 2 49.2 .96009 16.110 18.420 84.7 .21751 3 47.9 .74257 12.131 37.5El 84.7 .3E070 4^ 47.9 .38187 6.238 3E.799 64.7 .42422 l 5 47.9 .05246 .857 35.942 84.7 4142:

6 47.9 .47667 -7.787 28.155 84.7 .32130 7f 47.9 .80897 -13.216 14.939 84.7 .17E31 8~ 47.9 .98530 -16.096 -1.157 84.7 .012EE 9 50.1 .97164 -16.611 -17.7E6 76.9 . 23C i2 10 1100.1 .74071 -277.771 -295.539 276.8 -1.02750 11 2650.4 .32709 295.538 .000 L

MODE 2 OMEGA SOUCRED .3409 _.

, NATLRA FREQUENCY 5575.5100 SIGMA 1+TWE7A++2 2578.9463 SIGMA I+ THETA ++2 13306.1296 T INi 22715.43 T EXT 76?E2.29 '

STRESSED DIDMETER 0: EXTERNA _ 5-Ar- 16.00 ECv1 LIER *UM A* ITUDE .000020103857 IN 7457.32 >

c lh~ .EE ErT 2,22 FE 11047E540. *

~D t. l

  • C5 e.

FP 0.

1 ORDER R:9 TN VEC TSTINT TSTEXT PHI TMA1 TM~tE i .5 11151 172.07 1.506 177.4 601.2 .279 6322. 21 *5 ; .

1. 0 5575 101.93 .253 17.6 59.7 .046 1036. 3509.
1. 5 3717 141.99 3.789 367.9 1246.5 .651 154E0. 522 E 1.

l 2. 0 2787 26.44 .702 17.5 59.3 .198 4493. 15214

2. 5 2230 77.57 3.789 201.0 681.0 460 10896. 3E ?: 3.
3. 0 1858 18.96 .253 3. 3 11.1 .e12 266. 903. .
3. 5 1593 45.76 1.508 47.2 159.9 .134 3052. 10361.
4. 0 1393 29.32 1.211 24.3 82.2 .078 1771. 5???.
4. 5 1239 25.35 1.508 26.1 88.6 .077 1747. 5919.
5. 0 1115 18.52 .253 3. 2 10.8 .009 216. 731.
5. 5 1013 13.66 3.789 35.4 119.9 .108 2455. 8316,
6. 0 929 12.25 .702 5. 9 19.9 .016 365. 1235. ,
6. 5 857 9.74 3.789 25.2 85.5 .068 155E. 5171.
7. 0 796 8.18 .253 1. 4 4. 8 .004 85. 289. .

l 1424.

7. 5 743 6.62 1.508 6. 8 23.1 .019 420. [
8. 0 696 5.35 1.211 4. 4 15.0 .012 276. 943, e 8.5 655 5.09 1.508 5. 3 17.8 .014 312. 1058.
5. 0 619 4.38 .253 .8 2. 6 .002 46. 155.
9. 5 586 2.73 3.789 7.1 24.0 .023 523. 1771. ,

10.0 557 1.96 .702 .? 3. 2 .004 80. 271.

10.5 531 1.77 3.789 4. 6 15.5 .017 388. 1316. ,

11.0 506 1.48 .253 .3 .9 .001 23. 76. I' 11.5 484 1.18 1.508 1. 2 4.1 .005 119. 404

"

  • M S %D JY3 d% JW - . -

t MODE OMEGA 50UARED IN (RADIANS /SE;OND)o+2 a .537364E4 NATURAL FREQUENCY IN V.P.M. 8 7000*20 NO. INERTIA THETA 10M27 SIG"O

  • 3~0#~ # C -E~E 55.1 .06291 1 6. 8 1.00000 3.657 3.657 8' 7 .2257; 2 49.2 .93706 24.767 28.4'4

.5;850 3 47.9 .60137 15.4e7 43.931 84.7 4 47.9 .08288 2.134 46.065 64.7 .Su269

-11.667 34.193 84.7 403E3 5 47.9 .46081 '

6 47.9 .86443 -22.261 11.936 84.7 .1'056

-1.00521 -25.889 -13.953 84.7 .1E-65 7 47.9 .420;9 8I 47.9 .84063 -21.648 -35.601 84.7

.42044 -11.331 -46.932 76.9 .60i?7 9 50.1

.23524 10 1100.1 .18953 112.041 65.109 E76.6 '

11 2650.4 .04571 -65.109 .000

^

MODE 3 OMEGA SOUARED .5374 NATURAL FREQUENCY 7000.2600 SIGMA I* THETA ++2 2375.2154 SIGMA I+TmETA++2 2997.4770 ,

T INT 2837@.37 T EXT 16355.47 STRESSED DIA*E?ES Oc EXTERN 0_ SHA T 16.00 EQUILIERIUm AM:' ITUDE

- .0000s4773255 F IN 74E7.33 F INT 2. 4E F EXT 1.44 FE 160I97571.

FD 0.

F CR 0.

F C5 0.

FP 0.

TN VEC T5 TINT T5 TEX- PmI T*01I ~m;KE 09 DER RLM

.5 14000 172.07 .955 403.7 236.3 .122 3532. 20il.

1. 0 7000 101.93 .857 214.4 125.5 .306 3064 160I. i
1. 5 4666 141.99 3.103 1061.9 633.2 .364 11121. 6503.
2. 0 3500 3E.44 2.525 226.0 132.3 490 14199. G210.  !

2.5 2800 77.57 3.103 591.1 345.9 .271 7635. 4557.

3. 0 2333 18.96 .857 39.9 23.3 .027 793. 464
3. 5 2000 45.76 .955 107.4 62.8 .059 1699. 994
4. 0 1750 29.32 1.970 141.9 83.0 .087 2531. 14 E 2.

4, 5 1555 25.35 .955 59.5 34.8 .034 972. 563.

5. 0 1400 18.52 .857 29.0 22.8 .022 E 42. 376.
5. 5 1872 13.66 3.103 104.1 60.9 .061 1766. 1034
6. 0 1166 12.25 2.525 75.9 44.4 .040 1152. 674
6. 5 1076 9.74 3.103 74.2 43.4 .039 111?. ESS.  !
7. 0 1000 6.16 .857 17.2 10.1 .009 254. 143.
7. 5 933 6.62 .955 15.5 9.1 .008 234 137. .
8. 0 875 5.35 1.970 25.9 15.2 .014 398. 233.

8.5 823 5.09 .955 12.0 7. 0 .006 174 102.

9. c 777 4.38 .857 9. 2 5. 4 .005 13E. 80.
9. 5 736 2.73 3.103 20.8 12.2 .013 376. 220. .

10.0 700 1.96 2.525 12.2 7.1 .009 252. 146. l 10.5 666 1.77 3.103 13.5 7. 9 .010 270. 163. ,

11.0 636 1.48 .857 3.1 1. 8 .002 66. 40. '

608 1.18 2. 8 1. 6 .002 E6. 39.

11.5 .955

2. 8 121. 71.

12.0 583 .99 1.970 4. 8 .004

The next page (p.17) is a Tabulation of Mass Elastic Data showing other DSR-48 engines cf similar rating. Except for minor differences in flywheel and very similar, as generator, the torsional characteristic of these units arc indicated by the similarities between the torsional natural frequencies. I, listing of operating hours accumulated for several of these units are included in Section Four of this submittal.

i

- , e e ~ w h

~.,  %  %  %  %

u  % IL 4 u u u u u u - t 3

e u

e u

4 4 e e 4 4 t  :

.5 .E .5 .E .5 .5

.5

.5 i> tc o _ _ _

> > > > > > =

G w > > W W U V U U 6 6 V W l 'A 'S '6 '7 '8 's 'to 'It i '2 '3 K K K K K K g

K Kg g K y 4 5 7 3 K)

Typical Torsional Mass Elastic System (DSR-48/ Generator [

t 4

.-..r

~ ...

TABULATION Or MASS ELASTIC OATA 0F DSR-48 ENGINES.

8 .- 2 c5m .I E S co $5m w eSo 5e

$55 E288 2%28 288 E55 li2 3%% 3000 55%% d 32 5i&is at I

1 6.805 49 222 8.250 49 222 6.805 49 222 8.560 54.389 6.805 49 222 6.805 54.389 I

2 47 922 47.922 47 922 53 090 47 922 53 090 47 922 47 922 53 090 47 922 53.090 ifi 47 922 47.922 47.922 47 922 53 090 u7 922 53.090 1, 47 922 47.922 47 922 53 090 47 922 53.090 6 53 090 47 922 53.090 1 47.922 47.922 47.922 1

7 47 922 47.922 47.922 53.090 47 922 53.090 8

50.841 50.149 58.257 50.149 55.316 1 50.149 368.572 1280.633 1280.633 ff01100.520 1

1009.604 426.527 2650.432 2828.371 4976.067 2756.882 2650.430 2552.371 33 58.121 58.121 58.121 58.121 58.121 K 58.121 I

84.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 S4.727 K S4.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 K 84.727 84,727 84.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 K{ 8L 727 84.727 84.727 84.727 K 84.727 84.727 K 84,727 84,727 84.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 84,727 84.727 84.727 84.727 64.727 K 84.727 K 84.727 8L.727 8k.727 84.727 84.727 84.727 67.327 76.941 76.9L1 76.941 76.941 K 76.941 K 276.773 326.100 309.720 229 770 254.397 252.445 0

2280 2277 2143 2317 2219 2323 6421 3669 5146 5125 N)

N N

5576 7000 5988 7064 8792 6307 6913 6619 y

- 1

- - - 1 I CTWT Note:

1 inertla values of mass elastic system (Lb. f t, sec. )

K Stiffness values of mass elastic system ( Million ft. Ib. per Radian)

CTWT Counterweight used at each crankthrow

  • $4**
  • Saudi Arabia Installations are:

Dhuba 76010 to 76014 Oneiza 76026 to 76028 Wad! 78044 to 78046

) Rafha 79002 to 79004 1

Rabigh 80001 to 80003 N Torsional Natural Frequencies of tre first three rnodes (V.P.M.)

9

(

SECTION TWO TORSIOGRA*H TESTS O

TORSl0 GRAPH TESTS One of the three engine (S/N 74010/12) was torsiographed by both Failure Analysis Associates (FaAA) jointly with Stone & Webster (SWEC) as well as by Transamerica Delaval (TDI). TDI only measured overall r

torsional ampli tudes.

On page 19 are measured results by FaAA/5WEC and those by TDI . FaAA's measurement reflects actual peak to peak amplitudes of the overall composi te wavef orm. FaAA also provided the Spuare R,oot of the Sum of  ;

i the Spuare? ($PSS), which would be comparable to the overall amplitudes measured by TDI using the Bell & Hov. ell C.E.C. Vibration Meter. Also ,

included in page lo are test . 2sults of other 05R-48 engine generator sets with sinitar mass elastic system end of identical ratin9 It can be readily observed that the Fourth Order amplitudes measured by FaAA/5WEC on the subject crankshaf t are similar to values measured by TDI on similar 05R-48 engine generators. Aisc the FaAA/5WEC SRSS aralitudes and T01 measured overall amplitudes are very siri tar . It may also be noted here that the Bell & Powell C.E.C. I ,strumentation used by TDI is v.idely used in the trade and although the measurement do not represent a theoretically correct peak to peak amplitude It does however provide a common method in measuring the combined ef fects of the various harmonics.

On page 20, reference is made to the approval of crankshaf t drawing 03-310-05-AC, as well as the corresponding ABS forging report number and physical properties. For comparison of the actual crankshaft minimum tensile property between LILCO, Kousheng and Rafho, we have included the values for the latter two. e On page 21, allowable stress levels due to single harmonic and overall are calculated using 1982 and current 1996 ABS Rules.

18_ _

TORSIONAL TEST DATA ON DSR-48 ENGINE GENERATOR SETS.

A. Torslograch Test Results by FaAA/SWEC 3500 KV 3800 KW Fourth Order 325 3108 psi 339 3242 psi Overall, Pk to Pk .693 6626 psi .719 6875 psi _. . . . .

Overall, Calculated 424 4054 psi 454 4341 psi by SRSS B. Torsiograch Test Results by TDI. Using Bell & Howell C.E.C. Model 1-117-0001 Vibration Meter.

3500 KW 3800 KV Overall 425 4064 psi 450 4302 psi C. Torsiograph Test Results by TOI . Using Bell & Howell C.E.C. Model 1-117-0001 vibration Meter. on other 05R-45 Engine Generators.

S/u 76014 3500 Kw _

3850 kw 3365 psi 370 3557 psi Fourth Order 350 Overall 420 4038 psi .460 4423 951 l

S/N 74039 3385 psi 372 3478 psi Fourth Order 362 7 4208 psi 480 4488 psi Overall 450

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CRANKSHAFTS I

- ABS REPORT ON LOWER VALUE CASTINGS OR FORGINGS LOWER VALUE YlELD PolNT - PSI TENSILE STRENGTH - PSI REPORT NO.

LlLCO 58291 100777 83-ES 85280-1031 57276 101792 83-ES 85279-1031 48576 100777 83-ES 86290-365 RAFHA, 79004 50500 93700 79-K078165-232 KOUSHENG. 75006/08 55c00 93000 54000 93500 57000 98000 Crankshaf t material speelfled is ABS Grade 4 which is A668 - Class E.

Minimum yleid point l's 43000 psi and minimum tensile strength is 63000 psi.

The crankshaf ts for the DSR-48 carry a part or drawing number 03-310-05-AC, and has, ABS approval stamped, dated 2-26-1976.

s ALLOWABLE TORSIONAL STRESS CALCULATION.

Based on Para. 34.47 of 1984 ABS Rules.

$ . (_U +1823180 )Ck C d

C r

U = Minir um Tensile Strength of Shaf t Material 100000 PSI where C is .55 for propeller shaf ts and crankshaf ts k

C d

is size factor, 35 + 0.487 / N = .6463 C is speed ratio factor, 1.38 for 90*: to 105'4 rated RPM.

r S=( 00% + WM ) ( .55 )( .6463 )( 1,38 )

18

=3357 PSI due to single order Total Allowable Stress = 150% of 3357 = 5035 PSI ALLOWABLE TOR $10NAL STRCSS CALCULATION.

Based on Table 34.3 of 1982 ABS Rules.

gg gx x

[22123.jgggd 4) x 450 RPM alx450 RPM

= 360 RPM 427.5 to 450 472.5 R*".

= 135 RPM 3556 psi 2134 pst 3556 psi Grade 2, 60000 psi 5689 psi 5136 psi 3082 psi 5136 psi  !

Grade 4, 100000 psi 8217 psi 60000_) , ,3,4434 Stress limit multiplier = f ( 100 i for adjustment from 60000 psi to 100000 psi material.

D .

P 21

2.

V 4

I U

l SECTI0tJ THREE STRAIN GAUGE TESTS i

f l

Submittal to the American Bureau of Shipping for the DSR-4813-Inch by 12-Inch Replacement Crankshafts Fatigue Analysis of the Replacement Crankshafts The factor of safety 'against fatigue failure in the replacement (12-inch crank pins) crankshafts is calculated in this section. The stress levels in the replacement crankshaf ts are con $puted from strain gage test data. The endurance limit is first established for the failed cranksnafts (11-inch crank pins) from strain gage test data. This endurance limit is then scaled to account for the higher ultimate tensile strength of the replacement crankshaft. The effect of shot peening the replacement crankshafts prevides an additional margin against fatigue failure.

Stresses in Replacement Cranksnafts The replacement crankshaft was instrumented with strain gages in the fillet locations of crank pins 5 and 7 and tested under operational conditions at botn 3500 kW (100% rated load) and 3S00 kW (1094 rated load), 650 RPM synchronous speed, The highest stresses were measured in r. rank pin 5. A dynamic model of the crankshaft confi rms that this pin undergoes the greatest range of torque. Three-dimensional finite element models of a quarter crank throw show that the strain gage rosette was placed in the location of highest stress, both within the fillet and around the crank pin. The following strains were

- measured at 3500 kW:

Strain Gage Maximum Minimum 5-1 (compression) -195 uc 288 ue 5-2 (bending) 695 ue -410 uc 5-3 (tension) 737 uc -610 ue PRJ:5-03310A-d/slw 3/27/84

I i

To account for the simultaneous effects of shear and bending, the 4

stress state is represented by equivalent stresses using Sine's method [1].

For a biaxial stress state, the equivalent alternating stress, Sqa, and equi-valent mean stress, Sqm, are given by:

I S,=(Sf-S q

5 + Sj )U and Sq ,= 5,3 +S m2 where 5,3 and S a2 are the alternating components of principal stress, and Sm ,

and S m2 are the mean components of principal stress. From the test report

[2], the equivalent alternating stress, Sqa, and equivalent mean stress, 57, on crank pin 5 were calculated to be: l i

Sqa = 24.6 Asi Sq m = 4.8 ksi Equivalent stresses, S qa and S qm, are those alternating and mean uniarial stresses that can be expected to give the same life as the given multiaxial stresses.

Endurance Limit for Failed Crankshaf t ,

The failed crankshaft was instrumented with strain gages in the fillet location of crank pin 5. This fillet on the f ailed crankshaft had previously experienced a fatigue crack during performance testing. After the test, the l three-dimensional finite element models of a quarter crank throw showed that l the strain gage location on the failed crankshaft was placed close to the l t

location of maximum stress. The measured stress range is used to establish ,

the endurance limit in this analysis as a conservative assumption, although l the actual maximum stress range is revealed by the finite element model to be about 15 percent higher at a nearby location. From the test report (3), the l following strains were measured at 3500 kW:  ;

l t ,

f PRJ:5-03310A-d/slw 3/27/84 l i

Strain Gage At Maximum Torcue At Minimum Toraue  :

5-1 (tension) 1118 uc -707 uc 5-2 (ben n ng) 773 uc -459 uc 5-3 (comp ression) -389 uc 265 uc l

The equivalent alternating stress, Sqa, and equivalent mean stress, Sqn, were calculated to be:

Sqa = 33.7 ksi S

qm = 10.9 ksi -.

From the test logs, it was determined that the shaft had experienced 273 hours0.00316 days <br />0.0758 hours <br />4.513889e-4 weeks <br />1.038765e-4 months <br /> at equal to or greater than 100% load, or about 4 x 106 cycles. By using (

Miner's rule and typical slopes of SN curves, it was determined that the encurance limit for this mean stress was 32.4 ksi. The ultimate tensile strength for these crankshaf ts averaged 96 ksi. A line representing this endurance limit is shown on the Goodman diagram [4] in Figure 3.1.

Tnis line is bounded by two lines showing the endurance limit for full scale crankshafts based on other test data [5].

Endurance Limit for Replacement Crankshaf ts The replacement crankshafts have a minimum tested ultimate tensile strength of 103 ksi. The endurance limit scales linearly with ultimate ten-sile strength. On this basis, the endurance limit for the replacement crankshaft is shown in Figure 3 1.

The fillet regions of the replacement crankshafts have been shot peened. The effect of shot peening may produce widely differing increases in fatigue endurance limit; however, a conservative minimal value of this in-crease is 207, [6]. The endurance limit for the replacement crankshafts, including the effect of shot peening, is shown in Figure 3.1.

1 PRJ:5-03310A-d/slw 3/27/84

i Factor of Safety Against Fatigue Failure The factor of safety against fatigue failure of the replacement crank- [

shaf ts is 1.48 when the effect of shot peening is not considered, and is 1.75 when the effect of shot peening is assumed to increase the endurance limit by  :

20%;

At 3800 kW, the strain gage test data [1] on the replacement crankshaf t I

shows that the stress level is 4% greater than it is at 3500 kW. At 3900 kW it would be about 5% greater than it is at 3500 kW. Thus, there is an ade-quate safety margin against fatigue failure at the specified diesel generator j set two-hour-per-24-hour period rating of 3900 kW. f I

b 9

PRJ:5-03310A-d/slw 3/27/84

, , - - . - - , - - , , , y-- -. v- - ,,.- w w-,.,-y +- y 9c,. -- --w--m.---y.-e- mr--p.--q--- .4--w- ~

References Fuens , H.O. , and Stephens , R. I., " Metal Fatigue in Engineering," Wiley, 1.

1980.

2. Bercel , E. , and Hall , J.R. , " Field Test of Emergency Diesel Generator 103," Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, March,1984.
3. Bcrcel , E. , and Hall , J.R. , " Field Test of Emergency Diesel Generator 101," Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, October,1983.
4. Collins, J.A., " Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design," Wiley,1981.

Nishihara, M., and Fukui, Y., " Fatigue Properties of Full Scale Forged and 5.

Cast Steel Crankshaf ts," Transactions of the Institute of Marine Engineer.

ing, Series B on Component Design for Hi ghly Pressure-Charged Diesel Engines, London, January, 1976.

Burrell, N.K., " Controlled Shot Peening to Produce Residual Compressive 6.

Stress and improved Fatigue Life," Proceedings of a Conference on Residual Stress for Designers and Metallurgists, Ame ri can Society for Metals, April, 1980.

~ .

.j PRJ:5-03310A-d/slw 3/27/84

~

50 , , , , ,

47.0 i

a g 20% increaso in endurance limit due to shot peening T,i ai e 5 40 _s *-- Factor of safety is 1.75 __

's

~

39.2

  1. Endurance limit for replacement crankshaf t "m 38.5 E s

, \ N without shot peoning Factor of safety is 1.48 F s s e 's \ Stress endurance limit from test on f ailed crankshaf t

o N N NN z 30 -

s

- s i < 3r s

rpStress sh N

z u g s

" til from test onN\

$ replacement N sN

< 20 ,f crankshaf t NN' s N

) e l s 2 e s 4 g  ! Range of f atigue test s h* '

4 j data for other full scale gs i > t crankshaf ts with UTS of sNs

]

10

's -

= l '%

) / '\

l  ! UTS for f ailed crankshaf ts I I I i

! m O 20 40 60 80 100 120 h UTS for replacement I4 EQUIVALENT MEAN STilESS (ksi) cranskshall Y

Figure 3-1. Goodman diagram for replacement crankshafts.

1

P f.

t i

R SECTION FOUR I

OPERATING HOURS LOGGED i

r i

4

'e

-_w- , _ . - . , , , . - . , , _ _ - , - . - , - , - - , . , - , , , -,,--,--,-7, - - , . ---n, , . - - - , ,

AVAILABLE LOGGED HOURS OF OPERATION OF DSR-48, RATED 3500 KW P 450 RPM AV. LOAD OTHER LOADS &

KILOWATT RATING TOTAL HOURS SERIAL .

LOGGED DATE LOGGED REPORTED HOURS REPORTED NUMBER LOCATION P 450 RPM

( 368 4-01-84 ) 3500 KW c Above 114 Hrs.

74010 ) ( 430 4-01-84 ) --

3500 KW c Above 116 lirs.

74011 ) LILCO, Shoreham 3500

( 345 4-01-84 ) 3500 KW L Above 110 llrs.

74012 )

( 246 3-15-84 )

75005 ) 22 1 07, KOU5HENG, TAlWAN 3600 368 31 50 299 3-15-84 )

( ,

75008 )

( 19800 3-17-84 )

76010 ) ( 23300 3-17-84 ) --

76011 ) 23800 3-17-84 ) --

76012 ) DHUBA, SAUDI ARABIA 3500 (

( 19700 3 17-84 )

76013 ) ( 23500 3-17-84 )

g 76014 )

( 16204 3-17-84 )

76026 ) 3515 ( 12428 3-17-84 ) - 3000/3200 KW for 9000 Hrs.

76027 ) ONElZA, SAUDI ARABIA 14978 3-17-8's )

(

76028 ) --

( l0 3-15-84 1100 KW

.78029 ) U. OF TEXAS 3500 5385 3-01-84 1100 KW

(

78030 ) --

( 10882 3-17-84 2200/3000 KW 78044 )

3515 ( 10832 3-17-84 2200/3000 KW 78045 } WADI DAWASIR, SAUDI ARABIA 11212 3-17-84 2200/3000 KW

(

78046 )

( 12667 3-16-84 -- 3300 KW for 6200 ifrs.

79002 ) ( 11655 3-16-84 -- 3200 KW for 8250 Hrs.

79003 ) RAFHA, SAUDI ARABIA 3515

( 13186 3-16-84 -- 3200 KW for 5500 Hrs.

79004 ) --

( 10196 3-16-84 2700 KW 80001

) 3515 ( 10245 3-16-84 2800 KW 80002 ) RABIGH, SAUDI ARABIA l1602 1-16-84 2800 kW

(

80003 )

A A&&U A AUG11 D ul OG M U A O AA App 111g SURVEY,  ? ORT OR OTHER SERVICE PURCH. EORDER

- TRANSAMRICA DELVAVAL INC, BOX 2161 ~j' DA% LAND CA. 94621  ;

L

- - ATTN: BAVID BECK  ;

l TERMS - payable upon receipt ;

sTouEu DATE BRANCH VE55El., 8.D. NUMeER utvoicE r

NO. -

l l

100331 285219 4 APRIL 84 451 - ---

4 5LANKET P.O. NQ. *g g PURCH. ORDER NO.

REQUIS4 TION NO.

SERVICES REQUESTED BY:- ,

[

SERVICES AT:

{

CCFG. NO.:.

GNCLOSED REPORT / CERTIFICATE: -

5 5h-h= la ^-l N_-te!! H EA j '

zt%=; A . _ .

m.y -- gu

@ERVICE DESCRIPTION: X 2 nf_=._ m_ _ -

s .s ~ mm e '

usqqgj a.% a i.

[

-n .emwm a, >

r- = n e--= =

ENGlNEERING REVl'EW OF REVISED DRAWINGS FOR MODELS DRS-48/ MMf75,,Q  !

Dm-48. AS PER YOUR LETTER OF maM5V4 - he t 16, MutCH 1984. 8 meetWt t Ei_. - 6 .+, i ..

WM K^^* ?*? Mi iGU3KWMAX r-rmuze en.%m wm- :--y -:

6mitipts.

m=.;-3 55.edM!!f!'

e=:=x.m m+,

..-. = . _ . - . ,

' 5l 5 _555^ _

_ g, _w N *Ol$l >

2MMm= .- muu.Tl.T.M

~

, we*

$ Mt4 @ N sya ,,m ' " b- . -

Z_

KM m _ L g f g i s a- --wa

@ .E M Ml

.., . gNie- g n %r_ % MawM.er-swim  ;

! ww ym

-= .

.. . .< ...- s <

'"vwa - . . .

4 qq

-...a

.. .u . __

s_

NOTE - UNLESS OTHERWISE MUTUALLY AGREED IN WRITING, ALL SERVICES RENDERED D CERTIFl '

ES ISSUED IN i E SIDE HEREOF. l lCONNECTION WITH THIS INVOICE ARE GOVERNED BY THE TERMS AND ' CONDITIONS ON THE - i e ..

.. . .. l PLEASE REMIT TO 65 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, N.Y.10006 AND ATTACH GREEN COPY FOR PROPER CREDIT. \

l O'  :

r

,A3 AC 365 a 3/83 l

L

.._-,---_____----,,___-.-_-,---,,-.n--

f i r  ;)) J' <

~ t ///f ?/f7/// . //7ff/// .f - l

/j/ ////f/

. lt.u'.,. i.i u a n a o .y l r

~

. ut f.Ik . . h. l//./< /

S+i

  • AJD/el i 3 April 1984 .9C(.4,TS-2 Delaval Enterprise Engine Model DSR-48/DMR-48 4875 HP (d 450' RPM,1700 psi MFP i Dwgs, as per attached sheet. l i

Transamerica Delaval Inc.  ;

Ertgine and Compressor Division j 550 85th Avenue r P.O. Box 2161 3 Oakaland, CA 94621  :

Attention: David Beck i

Gentlemen:

We have your letter of 16 March 1984 resubmitting copies of plans as listed ,

therein on the above subject and with regard thereto have to advise that we l would have no objections to the changes made to the plans since the last  !

l submittal.

An invoice covering the cost of our review of the subject drawing will follow separately.

Two copies of each of the drawings appropriately stamped are being returned.

Yours very truly, l AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING W.M.HANNAN Vice President ,

9 e! r?

by:  ; M Robert A. Giuffra L')b Principal Surveyor-Machinery I

ABS San Francisco-print l cc: l Billing Dept.

l c l

i 7tatPMONE. 212 440 C3C0 Casig A::etts at:os; *w s ut.gs. 2* ts 't.in it' 4219ec sCa 2 320$$ wve 62035)

h DENCb 03/84 . .AR84 REC 19 MAR 84 SUI TY DSL QUT M N SHIP '

LOC TT 0.0 ADD .

S* COMT '

  • 4 23163 FLD Y X-REF IND - -i PP A INT

?N 4 TITLE L TYPE OUT DL

-305-02-AA BASE DSL i

-305-02-BV BASE DSL i

-310-05-AK CRANKSHAFT DSL i

-315-03-AH BOLT, BASE TO BLOCK DSL i

-341-04-AB PISTON STUD DSL i

-341-0~4-Ay PISTON SKIRT DSL i

-341-7319- PISTON ASSEMBLY DSL i 31005AC CRANKSH6FT DSL i 31503AH CYLINDER DLOCK DSL i O

s 6

i I

1 i .

oaweawweaaoeeu Engine an: Com: esse .,'. 5 :-

. **5"'""'

D I P.O Ben 2161 gy

== E Oakland Cahtania 94E21

' d15' 577 7400 l *d ~

March 16, 1984 American Bureau of Shipping 65 Broadway New York, New York 10006 Attention: Mr. Robert A. Giuffra Subj ect : Delaval Enterprise Engine DSR-48/DMR-48 Rated @ 225 B}EP, 4875 HP, 450 RPM Firing Pressure 1600/1700 PSI

Dear Mr. Giuffra:

Relative to the conversation you had with Roland Yang on the subject of updating existing approved drawings for the DMR/DSR-48 engine.

I have prepared a list previously approved drawings for DMR-48/

DSR-48. We are sending you four (4) copies of drawisgs, which have been modified since the previous approval in 1976.

In the listing, I have describe the details of changes or modifications, with the current drawing numbers. Those marked "Same" are unchanged.

We appreciate your help in this matter and look forward to obtaining the approved drawings. If I can be of any assistance, do not hesitate to call me.

Youre truly, i

David Beck -#

Analytical Engineer DB/wam Att. ,

e

.- .J .-

DRAW 15C L15T TOR

. . tes-48 /D$ R-48 ENCINIS Tence A.B .S . Dravings Detallt of

(* Approved Hodified Changes Since Approval Enterprise Model .

Base 03-305-02-3P 03-305-02-IV Draving "1Y" Adds heles:

03-305-02-AA Drawing A, .,,

Same as Dvs. "1?"

with the exce-tie?

  • of higher tain br, ca; turque and latter tair. bsari:.

cap dowels.

Bolt, base to block 03-305-02-AM SAME Cylinder Block 03-315-03-AC 03-31$-03-AH 03-315-03-e has 6 holer adicd en side of blect. -

othervise sa as 03-315-01-At whit' is approved.

Capscrevs block to base

  • SAE Liner 03-315-02-0E SA'E Cylinder Head 03-360-03-0T SAME Stud cylinder head 03-315-01-0A SME Piston Assembly 03-340-3615 03-341-7319 Uses skirt & stut below.

Piston Crown 03-340-04-AE SAME 03-340-04-AT 03-341-04-AE Ribbing added i Piston Skirt changed for addai strength.

Pistca Stud 03-340-04-AG 03-341 04-A8 70 be used with 03-341-0 -A1 sk1G same eaterial and thread.

Connecting Red 03-340-03-AA SAME Connecting Rod D-4379 FA"E Material spec.

Crankshaft 03-310-05-AC 03-310-05-AK 03-310-03-Ar ret to 02-310-05-At which is apprevt Crankshaf t satorial spec. D-4774 SME

-=

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 'if '_f.'-

" 7 LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 04 f{ 7 7 ,

~

~  ; ,' ';g" -

)  %.;

In the Matter of )

)

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY )

) Docket No. 50-322-OL (Shoreham Nuclear Power )

Station, Unit 1) )

)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of SUFFOLK COUNTY'S APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS dated July'9, 1984, have been served to the following this 60th day of July,1984, by U.S. mail, first class, by hand when indicated by one asterisk, and by Federal Express when indicated by two asterisks.

Lawrence J. Brenner, Esq.* Ralph Shapiro, Esq.

Administrative Judge Cammer and Shapiro Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 9 East 40th Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission New York, New York 10016 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. George A. Ferguson* W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.**

Administrative Judge Hunton & Williams Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P.O. Box 1535 School of Engineering 707 East Main Street Howard University Richmond, Virginia 23212 2300 - 6th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20059 Dr. Peter A. Morris

  • Mr. Jay Dunkleberger New York State Energy Office Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Agency Building 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Empire State Plaza Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, New York 12223

Edward M. Barrett, Esq. James B. Dougherty, Esq.

General Counsel 3045 Porter Street, N.W.

Long Island Lighting Company Washington, D.C. 20008 250 Old Country Road

, Mineola, New York 11501 Mr. Brian McCaffrey Stephen B. Latham, Esq.

Long Island Lighting Company Twomey, Latham & Shea Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P.O. Box 398 P.O. Box 618 33 West Second Street North Country Road Riverhead, New York 11901 Wading River, New York 11792 Joel Blau, Esq. Marc W. Goldsmith

, New York Public Service Commission Energy Research Group, Inc.

d The Governor Nelson A. 400-1 Totten Pond Road Rockefeller Building Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Atomic Safety and Licensing *MHB Technical Associates Board Panel 1723 Hamilton Avenue i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Camnission Suite K Washington, D.C. 20555 San Jose, California 95125 Docketing and Service Section Hon. Peter F. Cohalan

. Office of the Secretary Suffolk County Executive i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ommnission H. Lee Dennison Building

{ 1717 H Street, N.W. Veterans Memorial Highway Washington, D.C. 20555 Hauppauge, New York 11788 Richard J. Goddard, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing l Ralph Caruso Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ommnission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Stuart Diamond Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq.

Business / Financial Staff Counsel NEW YORK TIMES New York State Public Service 229 W. 43rd Street Commission New York, New York 10036 3 Rockefeller Plas:a Albany, New York 12223 Stewart M. Glass, Esq. Robert E. Smith, Esq.**

Regional Counsel Guggenheimer & Untermyer Federal Emergency Managepunt 80 Pine Street Agency New York, New York 10005 26 Federal Plaza

, New York, New York 10278

>