ML20090B348
| ML20090B348 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1992 |
| From: | Burski R ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| W3F1-92-0122, W3F1-92-122, NUDOCS 9203030337 | |
| Download: ML20090B348 (5) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
?:~ ENTERGY
["'y ""*"""'"
- f.. s R. F. Bur ski fa L
W3F1-92-0122 A1.05 QA rebruary 27, 1992 U.S. Nuclear llegulatory Conunission ATTN: Docuinent control Desk Washingtoni, D.C. 20555 Subject :
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No NPF-38 Fitness for Duty Performanco Data, Six Month Report Gentleinen:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d), Entergy Operations, Inc. hereby submits by attachment, the Fitness for Duty Perforiannee Data for the six month period from July 1 to December 31, 1991.
If you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact II.R. Lootzerich at (501) 739-6630.
' Very truly yours,
&y B F/%d RFil/Illtl/ssf Attachment (w/ Attacl* ment )
ect R.D. Martin, NRC Region IV D.1,. Wigginton, NRC-NRit N.S. Reynolds ll.B. McGehoo NRC Resident inspectors Office i
l 020151
, f '{i 9203030337'920227
'\\~
pga_ ADOCK 05000382 PUN R
~..
4 1
m.--,
l
'erformance Data Personne: Subject to CFR 26 l
Entergy Operations, Inc.
December 31, 1991 COMPANY 6 MOW 1HS LNDINQ l
Waterford 3 SES, P. O.
Box B. Killona, Louisiana 70066 LOCAnON Robert F. Sumicek, Supervisor, Personnel Assurance (504) 739-6307 l
cont Act Naut PHoNt (tuvot art.A 0000 l
1 I
CUTOFTS: SCREEN /CONflRMATION (ng/ml)
APPENDIX A TO 10CFR 26 r
i MARUUANA 50/15 AMPHETAMINES toon /500
_N/A
/
~
/
N/A
/
COCAINE 300/150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25 25 i
OPIATES 300/300 ALCOHOL (% BAC) 0.0407 N/A
/
l LONG TERM SHORT TERM CONTRACTOR CONTR.GTOR l
TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL AVERAGE NUMF;ER WITH UNESCORTED 805 N/A 380 ACCESS REFERRED ACCESS CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP (ESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE i
PRE {MPLOYMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PREBADGING 39 0
N/A N/A 49 1/0 PERIODIC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FOR CAUSE 2
0 N/A N/A 0
0 POST ACCIDENT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RANDOM 419 0
N/A N/A 177 1/0 6
0 N/A N/A 0
0 FOLLOW-UP OTHER 17 0
N/A N/A 21 0
483 0
0 0
N/A N/A 247 2/0 TOTAL
REND 00il TESTING N RESULTS INDMDUALS TESTED 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 j/
- POSmVE 4/
8 1
2
[891 66 852 596 _
- Tested 457.
.217.
- 447,
.177
% POSmVE GRAPH OF 5
-~~~
% POSmVE 4
3 2
1 j
CONFWIIAED POSmVE TESTS F0ft SPECIF)C SUBSTANCES MARUUANA 1
2 17 1
COCAINE 1
0 8
1 0
0 2
o OPtATES 0
0 0
0 AMPHETAMINES O
O 2
0 PHENCYCUDINE 2
0 1
0 ALCOHOL 9
6___
_.___.___.m__________________._m__m___.___
-. ~ - _ _ -
.. _.. ~. - - -.. - - -. -. - -. -. - - -
l FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM
SUMMARY
During this reporting period, approximately 50.3 percent of the population have been randomly tested. The rate of positives from random testing is 0.17 percent, POSITIVE RESUI.TS:
The two samples that yielded positive results were above the cut off levels i
established by the NRC and were confirmed positive by the Medical Review Officer.-
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
Access was not granted to the individual that tested positive on pre badging analysis. Management was notified and the individual's file was annotated of the positive result and management's actions.
The-individual' that tested positive during random testing had their access removed, Management was notified and their file was annotated of the positive result and management's actions.
Of the _ employees _ previously enrolled in follow up testing, one individual satisfactorily completed their_ follow up program during this reporting period.. Another. employee has been undergoing follow up testing resulting from a positive' result received previously.
This employeo has recently applied for and received unescorted access to the protected area.
This employee is still participating in follow-up testing.-
Presently, five employees are still enrolled in follow up testing programs.
During tnis reporting period, sixteen tests have been administered L
collectively to these employees. All results have been favorable.
Management took action to further clarify Company policy on the Fitness.for Duty (FFD)= Program. To ensure program uniformity _and consistency, the revised policy _has been implemented to cover all three nuclear sites operated by_Entergy Operations, Inc.
A FFD conference was held between laboratory technicians of Entergy Operations, Inc. and a representativo of Abbott Laboratories.the manufacturer of the drug testing equipment used by the Company.
This conference is part of an_ ongoing process to ensure the laboratory technicianc are receiving current knowledge on drug testing-methodology that will'be conducted. consistently between the three FFD Sections of Entergy Operations. Inc.
1 l
EVENTS REPORTED TO Tile NUCLEAR RECUIATORY COMMITTEE (NRC)!
During this reporting period, there were no violations of the fitness for duty policy that were reportable.
PROGRAM VEAKNESSES:
During this reporting period, there were no noted prograin weaknesses, t
4 s
I t '
+.,~n4.,.,,
a,n,---, -, - - -., -
w.,,:
,,.,.,.,, i..,.,,1,.,e..
un,,
, + -..
en,..,---,,_.>--,,.
n.,,.
_.,,.,. -