ML20087N595
| ML20087N595 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1984 |
| From: | Rolonda Jackson MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20087N593 | List: |
| References | |
| TS-1, NUDOCS 8404040067 | |
| Download: ML20087N595 (16) | |
Text
.
},.
.l Page 1 of 3 Technical Specification Review Procedure TS-1 1.
PURPOSE To define the requirements for the review of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (ggt:S) Technical Specifications by Project Engineering.
II.
SCOPE Project Engineering will review the GGNS Technical Specifications er
. portions thereof within the Bechtel scope of responsibility, against the Design Analysis for correctness, for consistency with the FSAE and SER and the As-built Configuration of the Plant.
III. REFEREf'CES A.
Final Safety Analysis Peport (FSAR) Amendnent 57 E.
Safety Evaluation Report (SER} through Supplenent 4 C.
Technical Specification Sections as marked by MP&L D.
Design Docunents E.
Division of Responsibility (Procedure Attachment 7A end 7Bi IV.
DOCUMENTS / FORMS A.
Technical Specification Review Sheet and Review Checklist -
Attachrent No. 1 B.
Technical Specification Review Sign-off - Attachment No. 2 C.
Technical Specification Review - Attachment No. 3 D.
Technical Specification Instrument Review Sheet - Attachnent No. 4 E.
Technical Specification Problem Sheet - Attachment No. 5 F.
Technical Specification Punch List Review Sheet - Attachnent ho. 6 G.
Technical Specification Priority Transmittal - Attachment No. 8 H.
Transnittal of Proposed Changes to Grand Gulf Techr.ical Specificatiens - Attachment No. 9 I.
FSAr/ER Change Request - Attactment No. 10 V.
PRXEDP E l
A.
The Bechtc1 review is a multidisciplire eficrt, cor, vt' o' tN
~
I gg following elements:
O A 1.
Review by a Responsible Engineer
- t{n o
2.
Review by a checker at 88 3.
Review by the applicable Group Supervisor 1
wo U#
4.
Input fron and coordination with other disciplines, as recair ed, with input sul jected to st wndary e stiplint rewlen i
ett as in 1, 2, and 3 above.
i i
,5.
Independent review by Review Cor=ittee, composed of applicatle discipline representatives, independent of review personnel in 1 through 4 above.
4 e,
s' Page 2 of 3 6.
Review / approval of Prcject Coordinator 7.
Monitoring and sanple surveillances by the Project Quality Engineer B.
The criteria for the review is as follows:
1.
The GGf45 Technical Specifications or portions thereof for which Bechtel is responsible will be reviewed against the design analysis for correctness. The Tech Specs will also be conpared to the FSAP. and the SER for consistency and to the as-built plant.
2.
The scope of the review is based on the content of the Standctd Technical Specifications for the BWR-6, as provided by MP&L.
3.
The GGNS Tech Specs serving as the basis for review is that version provided by MP&L which has been narked up to include the MP&L punchlist itens requiring evaluation.
4.
The as-built condition of the plant is to be determined as noted below:
a.
The " red-line" as-built drawings provided by MP&L to Bechtel by transmittals of DCA NPE-4-028 dated February 27, 1984, and DCA NPE-4-038 dated March 6, 1984, define the latest as-built condition of the plant and are te be used for defining the as-built plant.
b.
For items not c" overed by these " red-line" as-built drawings, verification is to be obtained for the "as-built" condition of applicable conponents evaluated as follows:
1)
Available documentation fron MP&L is to be used where it defines the as-built plant.
This ceuld be do:unented surveillances or other propcely ve: W rtet infornation.
2)
Thc intent is to define the "as-bailt" certitier c' physical components.
3)
Physical characteristics, such as proper electrical connections, are assumed known to be acceptable cnd correct through verified continuity checks and cc: ponent/systet functioning.
C.
Administrative and documentation functions to be observed are as follows:
1.
The recuirermnts ad standa rd docu: ent M ict f r. r.- e e'
'5-t ' r.'. '
GGNS h u. Spet Review Procedures f;c. lb-] will be used tc document the results of the Tech Spec review. (Attachrent l' 3
fiOTE:
1.
BPC forms may vary in format but not content frcn Mr&L forr:s.
Page 3 of 3 s
2.
Onsite review team will supplement BPC review packages as follows:
a.
Insert TSPF fom when no punchlist item applies, j
b.
Add punchlist item number to BPC TSPS fom identifying problems.
2.
A coordination sheet will be used to record the interdiscipline review of applicable Tech Spec sections, and this sheet will be retained for in-house verification of interdiscipline review.
(Attachment 2) 3.
Other forms of documentation will be used as deemed by the Group Supervisor to be necessary to accomplish the Tech Spec Review in an efficient and effective manner (Attachr.ents 3 through 6 include all forms used).
4 Requests and responses for as-built walkdowns or other forrs cf as-built verification will be controlled and documented.
(Attachment 3) 5.
A Division of Responsibility (DOR) shewing Bechtel-reviewed sections or the interface of Bechtel/GE jointly reviewed sections has been established (Attachment 7A & 78) and will te controlled.
For specific Bechtel/GE interface points, a copy of the GGNS Tech Specs marked up per the DDR for joint sections has been established and will be controlled.
6.
Upon conpletion of Bechtel-reviewed sections, the review package (less any coordination sheets) will be transnitted tc.
MP&L via standard transnittal (Attachment 8).
One advance ccry will be telecopied to MP&L. Hard copies will be transnitted to GE (Al Smith) and MP&L (MP&L will be responsible for their internal distribution).
D.
Document changes:
1.
When a Technical Specification change is recessary, a Frcpesed Change to Operating Licenses (PC01) safety neluaticr (Attachment 9' will be prepared.
This will be included in the transmittal package or will follow within one day.
2.
When an FSAR change is necessary for consistcr.cy, a nert up of the FSAR page(s) will be prepared and included in the package for information.
An SAR change reouest will subsequently be prepared using standard procedures. (Attachnent 10)
Page 1 of 1 I;ISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 7]
. h )q GRAND GULF NUCLEAR POWER STATI0t'
_1
'S UNIT 1
-- ' ' ~ "
- Technical Soecification Review Sicnoff Technical Specification Paraneter P.eviewed:
Signature /Date Checked:
Signature /Date G-cup Supervisor:
si nature /Date Cocrdination:
P.echanical Signature /Date Elec/ Control Systems Signature /Date Plant F.acilities signature /Date Civil Signature /Date Licensing-Signature /Date Review Corcittee-si nature /Date
Page 1 of 1 V
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Ii
~
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR POWER STATION d
UNIT 1
)
~
Technical Specification Review WakkdownRequestNo.
Technical Specificetion Discipline
Response
0 g
r
=
Page 1 of 1
~
^
se 73 MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY j9 L/
y GRAND GULF NUCLEAR POWER STATION j
,.L,
[_-,7,;.2ahf L '-
UNIT 1 1
Technical Specification Instrument Review Sheet Paraneter Instrument Numbers (Trip Unit for trip channels / indicating device for tonitoring channels)
Review Docurent Cc :,ent s Minitur Number of Channels s
4 Setprir.t/ allowable Value i
+
4 Surveillance Requirenents
. Action Statements O
-,,...-,,-w-
.--,---y.
,m,
-4
,,n--
,y,
-,,..n-
i:-
Page 1 of 1
,/-
'I MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY f,g L
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR POWER STATION Ah UNIT 1 Technical Specification Problem Sheet Priority Item No.
identified By Date Responsible Supervisor Tech Spec
Reference:
Problen
Title:
Probler Description (Tech Spec, FSAR, SER, GE Design, Other):
1.
2.
Safety Significance :
3.
Anticipated Resolution:
4.
I:RC Response to Item (NRR/IE):
/
i:RC llotifiecaTndividual notifiec Iyate aire 5.
Disposition :
Itcr.s Closed:
(Hos)
I Date Time
Page 1 of 1 flISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY If 7~ T 7,
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR POWER STATION 1
['
'f !
UNIT 1 P2; Technical Specification Punchlist Review Sheet Punchlist No.
Comments i
l l
.l J
4 I
I I
]
' A Page 1 of 14 dv O sh/rf TewNicAC 9&CificArbd to)MX bad 74 Hf'GLlG.E.
BUTEL bwistod of ErsfMst8luTY N.e.ne_seua2/4.s.sreo-s/(t w Be; m i slajra eevee n GE To D.a E. } cuwat bc.c.
pot. Ss.W 3[4.4.2..(,, /sb>@
4 L Se-T od %j 4.*l.~i ro Aa. GE Sc ePE W 7 1[Ghi ht$C GE Tb b.cA. At. Se<Md5 3/Q.T,2..! < 3 3[4.T. 2. 2.,
- u. sN.t.4.2.
2, 2/4.t.y.i, s/q.u.2,
-)
.]
i s<,
NOTE: Cover Sheet Only: Copies may be obtained from
, ~ '
Planning and Control, i
r 4 f l
l l
l l
l
,f'
' ~
,-r s
\\
.m..
. B Page 1 of 74 P_EV O 3[9[P[
GE' BEc.HTE L.
RES PDOS ID oF gig lSio a gavtse ava 3/4 4-M 3 AD* "
g.u i, 9,fgy
>/4 9-9.
ro 2, siislttJ e m Mr.s s)4 q-9 w wr.c secta s/43.7 sE scott Ao>re russ 3/4 4-14, s/4 4-ts, 3/4 6-14, 3/4 G ts, Eno 3, sla/tg 3/4 9-t 7.
s/49-i6 un I
i OTE: Cover Sheet Only:
Copies may be obtained from Planning and Control.
l l
I page 1 of 1 J
TECK SPEC-PRl01TY TRANSMITTAL ormsm =>
i.
15740 Shady Grove Roed i/
EE 'HTELI OWER CORPORATl0N G.althersburg.Waryland 20*77.M54 G AITHMS!JURG POWER DIVISION M/
M MPT DATE:
j tilS$fS$1PP4 POWER & LKiHT COMPANY WIDDLE SOtJTH ENERGY.Inc.
TO POST OFFICE BOX 756 PORT GIBSDN.MISSISStPPI 30150 gECHTEt. JOB 15C26 SPECIFICATION NO B /L-391.0 BECHTEL FILE N A1T N.
C. Tyrone Gepass En:1. O Under Sep Cont D ACTION B
T Prmis En:t O Ur4e*Sc; Cent D
- 1. Approv, Manu
-n; me, pro:ee:
- 2. Appron ytmMma'eng Wtg mas n'o:n-C UnderSep.br D,
" cept f nete: Make changes at: ss:- 1fme
- 3. A;[ u f Me:'obim En:I ee: as a;; rove:
En=t. D Unde'Sep.Coer D 6
"I8'D '
Cpe:s "P /* "
- 1. O UncerSep Cover D S.
we
.mette:tuitee.Wfg may pro:ee:
Vellums En:
3 n:t E unse Se; Cent D
- s. Ce Te-vA; pron'oue care Othe' 7, into A 3,oniy Origina 5
\\
h.f Othe-on t% (IS NOT) APPa.lCABLE Gi\\
cati
.5 d s indicated below are fcrws-de:
Co r.ents concerning the Technical Speed i
Divisie cf for your revie.c and concurrence.
Acticn Rest:mitility Re='d.
Sta-ed *'G.E.
Tect Spec Title N.......... M...... M.............
Section
- .@?...I.
3. r.b:lt.k........M.@.N..... 55.../{.j/.g3s.............\\,........
.... ~ ~
- - -. ~..
~. ~.....................................
/
f......._,........p.........................................
~.
. - ~.
~...................................
\\
- i. J...........
V
~.- ~
........................./
. -... ~. ~.
....................................)
~.- - -.......................................,.........
. ~. ~ ~
Y
...........................................~..- ~ ~.~..~ ~ "."-""~*
a." ~ a" ~ n.~ ""+
~
If pu hcVe t.ny cr stions, please conttet the techtel Techn 2-Ceview Coordinttor. E. J. Cey on extension 35S2.
Lote:
J. D. Richr.rd, c/1 J. E. Cross. U/3 VY "'Y Y**"'
J. P. (Wutby. Jr.. u/2 L. F. Dale., w/1 hM'
(.. C..icith, u/1 J. Green, c/)
D. Stonestreet, w/2 J':" "
J. F. Pinto, e/3 J. Roberts, u/1 FSo3ect Engmer' N
a
Page 1 of 3 I
TRANSP.lTTAL OF PROPOSED CHA?;GES TO GTG bOLF HCHMCIL SHClflcATT0fis SU55ECT:
Technical Specification 3.6.1.5, page 3/4 6-8.
The present Surveillance Requirenents for Technical DISCUSSION:
Specification 3.6.1.5 do not contain the reevirenents to periodically perfom a systen functional test or a channel functional test and calibration. The systen functional test would demonstrate the operability of systen interloc6s.
Consistent with Section 1.6 of the Grand Gulf Technical Specifications Definitions, the channel functional test wculd verify the channel failure trip; t M channel calibration *:.1d ensure that the channel responds wjff fjt necessary renge ere accuracy to known values of the pa
% er which the cha rt' nonitors (pressure), consistent wit ec'j:n 3.4 of the G*and Gulf Technical Specification D i ni t s '- / The propcsed cW;e to the Grand Gulf Technical Sp ificat ons will require a systen functional test at each cala y scheduled re'uelite g l include sinalatec outage. The systen functi t
. p operating sequer.ce and actuation of the systen t % ; e valve actuates to its correct
- s u
verification that each a g.ee rfoms its intended fun:ti *.
f pcsition and each inter 1 N oe will require a channel x
Additionally, the proposed
- 31 daysend a channe' functional test at est onc calibration at least e per nenths.
E511FICATIOh: The proposed ch to th
-and Gulf Technical Speti'icatic-s is consistert wi A p1 ole Survei11 ante Requirener's o' etifications. The present Star.dard the Standard Techn a ens generically address surveillance and Technical
?ecifica testing f t
nents nr water positive seal isolatior vahe i
Surveillance Requirener+s 4.f.).9.a.1 y
leakage c itro.
te..
Technical Specifications require tN t the and 2 of seal water D,e 5
and seal water tant pressure be verifier le The Grand Gulf Feed ater LeaLace Cc-tec' pce every
\\ hours.
ifstem (FWL ] does not draw suction fron a seal water tad rer The Grend Gulf fis the fuel peol used as a source of water.
the
,.es the suppression pool as a source of water; FWLC n pool level is monitored once every four heurs in
'ss s drden with Grand Gulf Technical Speci'ication Surveillarce Surveillance Requirenent 4.6.1.9.b of
- V'kequire f t 4.6.3.1.a._,Jard Technical Specifications requires th w % e seal isolation valve be denonstrated operabic sie cycling during each cold shutdown, if not perforced curing the p
previous 92 days. Standard Technical Specification Survrille.t:e Cequirement 4.6.1.9.b is not addressed in the Grand gum Technical Specifications since this requirecent is elreed.s cddressed by the ASFE Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code.
Section XI requirerents to which Grand Gulf is cornitted (reference FSAR Section 3.9.6).
Surveillance Requircreet 4.6.1.9.c.? of the Standard Technical-Specifications recuires the demonstration of the Air Positive Seal Isolation Valvt Leakage Control Systen (APS-!YLCS) pressuri ation o' the seal t
.. m
- at mee for ion poni es.the
Attachmant 9 Page 2 of 3 o
TPANSMITTAL OF PR0r0 SED CHANGES TO GPANDTULF TECHhlCAL SPECIFICA110h5 (cont.)
Therefore, Surveillance Requirenent 4.6.1.9.c.2 of the Standerd Technical Specifications is not applicable to Grand Gulf.
With the exceptions noted above, resulting from Grand Gulf unique design differences, the existing Grand Gulf Technical Specifications and the prop; sed changes are consistent with the Standard Technical Specifications.
SIGN]TICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION:
,,.oe Grand 31f Technical These proposed chae pplicable portier.s c'
.3 Specifications a-' consistent with je r
inte the provisiers c' the Standard Tet deal Specificati ws bee-ap;teved by the the Standard Tet.nical Specificatic u.?.ure and involves ne f(RC, this change is adninistr *ive iT ere is no reductio *. in significant hazards considera thesafetymarginassociatedwi\\..th'j Technical Specifita*. ire.
f' accident or nalfurttic-as i The probability or conseq
'*e not been increased ner of equipment inportant t sa.)ty
- p. dent or nalfunction o' a has the possibility of ac Ir QCated previously been treated.
- ional surveillance requirenetts, ir different type than any fact, the inclusion of ae h al tes' and a channel functice.e1 the fem of a syst - functpill p ovide additional assurance that test and calibratd
1 perforn its intended sa'ety fuet:4c.
the Grand Gulf TKL s ' -hanges to the Grand Gu f Tectritel i
I n s uar.a ry, t ce ive a significant he:ards in-Specifications consideration.
\\,/N 4
/
8
\\
l v
e i
Page 3 of 3 FONTAINMENT FYSTEM
....,,...,,a
<l
- /:
- a.,;t..si..,..:'.16 3
FEED's'ATER LELKAGE CD'!TF0L SYSTEtt L!h!TI.'G C0tIDIT10N FOR OPERAT10?!
w-Two indeFendent feedwater leekage control (FWLC) syste i setlystems 3.6.1.5 shall be OPERABLE.
(3
- L1C ASILITY: OPERATI0tiAL Cot 01TIONS 1, 2, an: 3.
ACTION:
?-
ne inceers:le s.tsyste. to vith ene FWLC system subsystem incpere:1e, rest itMn tr.e next OPERAELE status within 30 days or be in at less, g. AU7CCht hours.
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> end in COLD SHUTDChN within the fo Qo i
.b Et; 'lE!'.La'lt! *E:UIREE Ni 3
/cedie:nstrate:CPE:.: ELE:
- 1. 5.1. 5 Esch FWLC syste n su:sysun snt N At least on:e per 31 cc,
obs ving proper operatien of tr.e c.
RHR jockey pump.
'g by cycling es:n valve n t tests:ie c.; ring At leest ence per l' m ~5
. at least one complete cycle cf f W traiti.
b.
POWER DPERAT N: thro ourn64
".5;nte95eWergren a
- c. nys w,'/ va'I WH'CM fMCLUDes c M vHb~vw FerJ /n^! A(
a
\\
SCN c p. 946 S YtMM TH4evc-Hour v
tT5 c 5 ;.. G tWCr G E.4 +wCE.-
Mb VGA. FM i
.p4g de, ex r,vro M 4 r ic.
- c.-t'c-(cv4m To l
m ap.s.s.
tos ow ocua G.M.n tamA "U:-
1 i TE.
<w7r.apcD Fvac.M ow.
- pgpAmy,
- d. Qg yrs,C,.sF4sUG-WG.
- l%"E %
- L ti!ZTR*'MCMif'D'A T'
0' Ol'rf.ASL5 cs c.:r.rmmt ce r,.
I
. t.Cssne< Fsa:n.ss< Tcrr r.c c cur cree eee 3 uvs up c.. O W.w a C m sc o b a m.
m-e %c
{0 RetJTIG
. 0 Page 1 of 1 m_,
)
t t
FSARIER CHANG 3 REQUEST 2
'd s
' 1j g
s Un't 1 Un't 2 Ecta vn to UNIT BECHTEL Ch.
APPUCABILITYk Swb.E C' C' GaahGL 4584;?t; F &as sg;;dO%5 t'%;6vD+%G YgJaf.T As.15 AND F4W8E&i J.t?.ts;a?::% %(;tt$ ?, F;a ;.4%sg a re s.;.. g ; e..an.;. 6 6,
- s *. L ; *
'.. * % ; a ',,%
om.e'% s i c e-E I
Dall CATE
"'o <t c 8 ' ct* 5G 5"c'* E t a'
- ac te s' <**; t c' tas'at E*.
LAFETYEeAiUATtOh PEDuimED O O
YLE e= 0 3
E E
C a'i APtv Q,10 L v su;L%5i%G-
&,Al t Da?L A m : stet
- wra.
AT1 a ;=v i % '
E 7 F C*T *(6svimONW E ttT AL (W ALU ATr?*s F W OF PINEID Af f(OT[p FLAm F AG(g,Tagtig ag:ET INECT5g FGUR[$ ST WehG bdWI1R$i R
Ca'i
~
d